Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Read Online Textbook Pavement Analysis and Design 2Nd Edition Yang H Huang Ebook All Chapter PDF
Read Online Textbook Pavement Analysis and Design 2Nd Edition Yang H Huang Ebook All Chapter PDF
In the Peritrichaceae the mates are unequal; the larger is the normal
cell, and is fixed; the smaller, mobile, is derived from an ordinary
individual by brood-divisions, which only occur under the conditions
that induce conjugation (Fig. 60). Here, though the two pairs of
nuclei are formed, it is only the migratory nuclei that unite, the
stationary ones aborting in both mates. During the final processes of
conjugation the smaller mate is absorbed into the body of the larger,
and so plays the part of male there. But this process, though one of
true binary sex, is clearly derived from the peculiar type of equal
reciprocal conjugation of the other Infusoria.
The Ciliata are almost all free-swimming animals with the exception
of most of the Peritrichaceae, and of the genera we now cite.
Folliculina forms a sessile tube open at either end; and Schizotricha
socialis inhabits the open mouths of a branching gelatinous tubular
stem, obviously secreted by the hinder end of the animal, and forking
at each fission to receive the produce. A similar habit to the latter
characterises Maryna socialis; all three species are marine, and
were described by Gruber.[168] Stentor habitually attaches itself by
processes recalling pseudopodia, and often forms a gelatinous
sheath.
Acineta, Ehrb. (Fig. 61, 2); Amoebophrya, Koppen; Choanophrya, Hartog (Fig.
62); Dendrocometes, St. (Fig. 61, 4); Dendrosoma, Ehrb. (Fig. 61, 9);
Endosphaera, Engelm.; Ephelota, Str. Wright (Fig. 61, 5, 8); Hypocoma,
Gruber; Ophryodendron, Cl. and L. (Fig. 61, 7); Podophrya, Ehrb. (Fig. 61, 1);
Rhyncheta, Zenker (Fig. 61, 3); Sphaerophrya, Cl. and L. (Fig. 61, 6),
Suctorella, Frenzel; Tokophrya, Bütschli.
BY
CHAPTER VII
PORIFERA (SPONGES)[185]
INTRODUCTION—HISTORY—DESCRIPTION OF H A L I C H O N D R I A
P A N I C E A AS AN EXAMPLE OF BRITISH MARINE SPONGES AND OF
E P H Y D A T I A F L U V I A T I L I S FROM FRESH WATER—DEFINITION—
POSITION IN THE ANIMAL KINGDOM.
The familiar bath sponge was naturally the earliest known member of
the phylum. It is dignified by mention in the Iliad and in the Odyssey,
and Homer, in his choice of the adjective "full of holes," πολύτρητος,
shows at least as much observation as many a naturalist of the
sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Aristotle based his ideas of
sponges entirely upon the characters of the bath sponge and its near
allies, for these were the only kinds he knew. With his usual
perspicuity he reached the conclusion that sponges are animals,
though showing points of likeness to plants.
It was not till 1825 that attention was again turned to the current,
when Robert Grant approached the group in a truly scientific
manner, and was ably supported by Lieberkühn. It would be
impossible to do justice to Grant in the brief summary to which we
must limit ourselves. The most important of his contributions was the
discovery that water enters the sponge by small apertures scattered
over the surface, and leaves it at certain larger holes, always
pursuing a fixed course. He made a few rough experiments to
estimate the approximate strength of the current, and, though he
failed to detect its cause, he supposed that it was probably due to
ciliary action. Grant's suggestion was afterwards substantiated by
Dujardin (1838), Carter (1847), Dobie (1852), and Lieberkühn
(1857). These five succeeded in establishing the claims of sponges
to a place in the animal kingdom, claims which were still further
confirmed when James-Clark[190] detected the presence of the
protoplasmic collar of the flagellated cells (see pp. 171, 176). Data
were now wanted on which to base an opinion as to the position of
sponges within the animal kingdom. In 1878 Schulze[191] furnished
valuable embryological facts, in a description agreeing with an earlier
one of Metschnikoff's, of the amphiblastula larva (p. 226) and its
metamorphosis. Then Bütschli[192] (1884) and Sollas[193] on
combined morphological and embryological evidence (1884)
concluded that sponges were remote from all the Metazoa, showing
bonds only with Choanoflagellate Protozoa (p. 121). This the exact
embryological work of Maas, Minchin, and Delage has done much to
prove, but it has to be admitted that unanimity on the exact position
of the phylum has not yet been attained, some authorities, such as
Haeckel, Schulze, and Maas still wishing to include sponges in the
Metazoa.
Halichondria panicea.
One of the commonest of British sponges, which may be picked up
on almost any of our beaches, and which has also a cosmopolitan
distribution, is known by the clumsy popular name of the "crumb of
bread sponge," alluding to its consistency; or by the above technical
name, with which even more serious fault may be found.[194]
Bidder has proposed to call the different forms of the same species
"metamps" of the species. Figures of the metamps of H. panicea will
be found in Bowerbank's useful Monograph.[195]
Sections show that the ostia lead into spaces below the thin
superficial layer or "dermal membrane"; these are continued down
into the deeper parts of the sponge as the "incurrent canals,"
irregular winding passages of lumen continually diminishing as they
descend. They all sooner or later open by numerous small pores
—"prosopyles"—into certain subspherical sacs termed flagellated
chambers. Each chamber discharges by one wide aperture
—"apopyle"—into an "excurrent canal." This latter is only
distinguishable from an incurrent canal by the difference in its mode
of communication with the chambers.
Fig. 64.—H. panicea: the arrows indicate the direction of the current, which is
made visible by coloured particles. (After Grant.)
The excurrent canals convey to the osculum the water which has
passed through the ostia and chambers. All the peripheral parts of
the sponge from which chambers are absent are termed the
"ectosome," while the chamber-bearing regions are the
"choanosome."