Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook Aligning Business Strategies and Analytics Bridging Between Theory and Practice Murugan Anandarajan Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Aligning Business Strategies and Analytics Bridging Between Theory and Practice Murugan Anandarajan Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/advanced-antenna-systems-
for-5g-network-deployments-bridging-the-gap-between-theory-and-
practice-1st-edition-asplund/
https://textbookfull.com/product/international-handbook-of-
psychological-well-being-in-children-and-adolescents-bridging-
the-gaps-between-theory-research-and-practice-borja/
https://textbookfull.com/product/reading-development-and-
difficulties-bridging-the-gap-between-research-and-practice-
david-a-kilpatrick/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-art-of-structuring-bridging-
the-gap-between-information-systems-research-and-practice-katrin-
bergener/
https://textbookfull.com/product/applied-mainline-economics-
bridging-the-gap-between-theory-and-public-policy-1st-edition-
matthew-d-mitchell/
https://textbookfull.com/product/advances-in-advertising-
research-vol-vii-bridging-the-gap-between-advertising-academia-
and-practice-1st-edition-george-christodoulides/
https://textbookfull.com/product/small-business-management-
theory-and-practice-tim-mazzarol/
https://textbookfull.com/product/healthcare-it-transformation-
bridging-innovation-integration-interoperability-and-
analytics-1st-edition-dodd/
Advances in Analytics and Data Science
Murugan Anandarajan
Teresa D. Harrison Editors
Aligning Business
Strategies
and Analytics
Bridging Between Theory and Practice
Advances in Analytics and Data Science
Volume 1
Series Editors
Ramesh Sharda
Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA
Hsinchun Chen
University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Preface
As a co-op institution, Drexel University has long-since recognized the need for
better linkages between academic/theoretical content and on the job training. At
LeBow, we have embraced this linkage through the sponsorship of an annual
conference called Bridging Practice and Theory Summit (BPTS). Historically,
BPTS invited keynote speakers with key insight into current challenges faced by
the business community and the content primarily focused on a traditional aca-
demic conference format of concurrent sessions with faculty presenting their
findings on innovative pedagogy. We begin to recognize the need to bring industry
into the summit as a full participant. Our conference focused on two themes: (i)
the need to bring current business issues into the classroom and relate these issues
to current theory without decreasing instructional rigor; (ii) the need to reinforce
the importance of increased dialogue between practitioners and academics.
BPTS seeks to foster this dialogue with a strong belief that these interactions
between practicing managers and researching academics are important in
increasing both the relevance of pedagogy and research vital for enhanced learn-
ing and bidirectional problem solving. That is, theory should inform practice and
vice versa.
From this mission, BPTS 2017 was developed with a focus on business analyt-
ics, given the growing need for strategic and systematic decision making,
informed by data and analytics. While we can all likely agree that fostering these
relationships would be beneficial, developing the mechanism for such collabora-
tion is not inherently structured into business or academic practices. Indeed, con-
ferences such as this are sorely missing in the current landscape. Academic
conferences often focus on specific academic disciplines with a lens toward
research while overlooking the pedagogical and applied perspectives, while prac-
titioner conferences lean toward tools and techniques and do not address a need
to bring practice to the classroom.
This conference uniquely highlights the perspective that we should more
actively involve the business community in this conversation to seek more
integrated solutions and potentially create more joint collaborations between
businesses and universities.
v
vi Preface
We therefore structured BPTS 2017 such that all academic sessions would be
co-led by an academic and a practitioner in the field. Faculty and industry experts
developed the topics, sessions, and presentations jointly, promoting a sustained
engagement in thinking about these important topics. The chapters you see here
are the culmination of that collaboration and therefore, collectively, provide a
unique and novel perspective on the ways that business analytics should grow as
a field to advance business practice.
We would like to thank Raji Sivaraman, PMI; Chris Radvansky, PRO Unlimited;
Samir Shah, Drexel University; David Kurz, Drexel University; Gerard Olson,
Villanova University; and Steven Pyser, Rutgers University, for their valuable
reviews of the chapters in this volume.
vii
viii Contents
Index������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 209
Contributors
ix
x Contributors
xi
xii About the Authors
ideation phases and following through to rollout, training, and adoption. His goal
is to deliver on the promise of analytics: make better decisions through data. An
expert in data modeling and engineering, systems architecture, and the Microsoft
Data Platform, he has delivered solutions in many spaces including manufactur-
ing, healthcare, fraud analysis, marketing pipelines, and sales.
Amit Devpura heads the Supply Chain Analytics group at AstraZeneca and is
responsible for improving supply chain performance metrics through advanced
analytical techniques. He has built a strong Analytics group that prides itself in
turning data into information and steering the organization on the Analytics matu-
rity curve. Amit has vast industry experience where he has led Analytics function
in technology, pharmaceutical, and apparel and footwear industries. Amit holds a
PhD in Industrial Engineering from Arizona State University and an MBA from
Wharton Business School at University of Pennsylvania.
Lawrence Duke is a Clinical Professor and also serves as a faculty advisor to the
MS Marketing program at Drexel University LeBow College of Business. His
research focuses on marketing ethics, quality, digital, and global marketing and
finance. Prior to becoming a business professor, he was a senior executive in inter-
national finance and marketing. He has 20 years of experience in the public and
private sectors, including positions at Citigroup, Nomura, State Street, and the
International Monetary Fund (IMF), and as a US naval officer.
Russ Kliman is an Innovator and Design Leader for Challenging Mental Models
at SEI as well as leader of SEI’s Global Innovation Program. Russ’ focus is to lead
various programs which have direct strategic impact across all of SEI’s markets
globally. At various stages of his tenure with SEI, he has led various strategic
initiatives from new business marketing and business development to product
design and technology leadership. Russ holds a Bachelor of Science degree in
Information Systems Design from Drexel University.
Mark Schild is Assistant Dean of the Stillman School of Business, at Seton Hall
University. In addition, Mark teaches finance and investment related courses
leveraging his 30-plus years’ experience owning and operating a broker-dealer
and investment advisory firm to transfer concepts into practice.
xvii
xviii List of Figures
xix
Chapter 1
Aligning Business Strategies and Analytics:
Bridging Between Theory and Practice
Abstract In this chapter, we discuss the current gap between academic training and
the needs within the business community, the potential for this gap to widen, and the
role joint work between academic and industry experts can play in bridging this gap.
We highlight the particular case of business analytics, calling attention to the current
business landscape and the need for strong training of future employees, grounded
in both rigorous theoretical background and links to the practical applications. The
chapter concludes by emphasizing the particular contributions of each chapter and
making a case for this type of work to be among the first of many steps in creating
more meaningful dialogue between higher education and business practitioners.
Introduction
The gap between theory and practice is widely documented and debated in the busi-
ness literature (Aram & Salipante, 2003; Argyris & Schon, 1974; Wren, Halbesleben,
& Buckley, 2007). In general terms, the theory-practice gap can be defined as the
discrepancy between what students acquire through the theoretical classroom lec-
tures and what they experience in the workplace (Ajani & Moez, 2011). There are
two main issues causing the theory-practice gap. First, some of the theory is too
idealistic and impractical. Second, even where the theory is practical and beneficial
to the organization, some practitioners do not act on it, possibly due to ignorance
and the rigid system in which they work or because they choose to ignore it.
While the gap between theoretical content and practical knowledge has existed
for some time, the need to facilitate the connections between the two has increased
dramatically over the last decade. Business decisions are becoming increasingly
complex and interdisciplinary, calling on knowledge across many business and
functional areas. This requires better grounding in theoretical content but also
increased knowledge across many domains.
Within academic institutions, the business curricula are often frontloaded with
theories on the grounds that students need to learn the theories before entering the
workforce. This is based on two implicit assumptions. First, these theories are appli-
cable in the real-life context for informing good practice. Second, formal theories
constitute the best grounding for the valid knowledge of practice. These theories are
often taught in a didactic manner as decontextualized abstractions and generaliza-
tions, to be applied later by students in their careers. This approach has historically
and traditionally been the preferred dissemination of the relevant theories under the
premise that the particular business and work-related applications will evolve dra-
matically and (perhaps) rapidly over a student’s career and thus the theories provide
the proper basis for learning new techniques, technologies, and methodologies.
Unfortunately, this approach leads students and working professionals to often
perceive a disjunction between the abstract form of these theories in texts and their
lived form in practice. As a consequence, many students find these theories to be
magniloquent and irrelevant to practice. Unless we are able to help students make
sense of the link between theories and practice, students will face problems in bridg-
ing the gap between the two.
Moreover, to the extent that organizations, business executives, and hiring man-
agers interpret this gap as implying that universities are not properly preparing stu-
dents for the current workforce, the importance and relevance of higher education
will be diminished. There are viable reasons why companies may view this gap as
widening. The pace of business decisions and the velocity of changes to the business
environment have increased rapidly over the last decade. These types of changes
filter down to business’ needs for job preparedness, which has increased tremen-
dously (Ahmad & Pesch, 2017). Organizations do not have the luxury of time for
new hires to “learn on the job.” They require individuals who can become immersed
in the business problems at hand quickly and develop relevant and timely solutions.
It is therefore no surprise that organizations may perceive that students are not as
equipped for this newer business environment. Such perceptions are a main catalyst
for corporations significantly increasing their expenditures on workforce training.
Ultimately, we need greater synthesis of theory and practice if we are to prepare
thoughtful practitioners (Raelin, 2007, p. 495). In business education, even at the
undergraduate level, business schools are doing the work of preparing practitio-
ners. To prepare someone implies providing a link, building a bridge, or making a
connection. Preparing thoughtful practitioners requires moving away from the
apparent dichotomy of theory and practice and moving toward the synergistic com-
bination of the two. Thoughtful practice is informed by the complements of theory
and practice. As we discuss further below, this volume in our view highlights this
natural complementary and provides insights into why and how deeper connec-
tions between the academic and practitioner community will lead to more impact-
1 Aligning Business Strategies and Analytics: Bridging Between Theory and Practice 3
ful learning, for students, academics, and practitioners, and ultimately stronger
academic and business institutions.
The discipline and study of business analytics are not immune to this theory-practice
gap. Many organizations have become increasingly more dependent upon business
analytics to obtain a competitive advantage. According to Forbes magazine, the
analytics market will grow to $203 billion by the year 2020 (Press, 2017). However,
despite the enormous corporate dependence on analytics, it is estimated that as few
as one-third of new analytics projects produce a positive return-on-investment and
that over two-thirds of all major analytics projects end in failure (Agarwal, 2017).
In a recent study, the Gartner group noted that the major factors leading to analytics
project failure are largely attributable to the lack of skills to deploy analytics-based
tools and technology (Gartner, 2015).
Thus, although businesses across the world have invested billions of dollars in
analytics in the last decade, organizations have found it difficult to harness the true
value of analytics for long-term benefit, even though there is evidence analytics can
transform industries and business practices. Aligning business strategies and analyt-
ics remains an elusive goal.
It is not unreasonable to posit that part of the failure can be attributed to the pro-
ficiency gap between knowledge and skills taught by academics and expertise and
know-how requirements necessitated by organizations. It is also possible that tech-
niques learned at institutions of higher learning become obsolete by the time the
student joins the work force. As discussed above, we argue that this rapidly chang-
Excel
SQL
Tableau
SAS
Visualization
Python
SAP
ing environment necessitates the grounding to strong theory but also influences how
both parties view the relative importance of current methods and techniques.
The authors examined the nature of the gap between skills taught by academics
and those demanded by industry in terms of business analytics tools. The study
found that there was a misalignment between academia and practice for most of the
analytics tools. As can be seen in Fig. 1.1, academia places an emphasis on SAS that
is unmatched by industry needs, whereas businesses have a need for professionals
experienced with Excel, SQL, SAP, and Tableau that academia is not meeting.
With projections for the demand of skilled business analytics talent to triple over
the next decade (Henke et al., 2016), organizations face challenges employing the
required numbers of skilled professionals. This presents a two-pronged challenge.
First, organizations confront the possibility of hiring business analysts with limited
or no skills and second, organizations additionally face the prospect of having a
shortfall of needed business analysts. This could be precarious for organizations in
the current business environment where predictability, reliability, and efficiencies of
analytics staff are paramount.
One potential way to reconcile academic preparation with industry need is to
increase the conversations between academia and industry, so that the gap between
them could be bridged more effectively. The chapters in this volume are the result
of such a conversation. The BPTS 2017 conference organized sessions such that all
academic sessions would be co-led by an academic and a practitioner in the field or
practitioners who crossed the boundary. The chapters you see here are the culmina-
tion of that collaboration and therefore, collectively, provide a unique and novel
perspective on the ways that business analytics should grow as a field to advance
business practice.
The chapters are broken into three sections. In the first section, the chapters pro-
vide an insight into analytics in the finance, transportation, and biopharmaceutical
industries. In the second section, the chapters discuss the importance of methodolo-
gies in analytics. In the final section, the chapters provide strategies by which align-
ment can be achieved between strategies and analytics. As highlighted below, the
chapters also discuss pitfalls that both academicians and practitioners should be
aware of that could make analytics less effective.
There are five chapters in this section. In Chap. 2, Kliman and Arinze examine how
the delivery of financial advice and how cognitive computing can provide value for
both the financial intermediary and the end consumer. For the intermediary, the
study will assess how cognitive computing can augment and supercharge the exper-
tise of the financial advisor, enabling the advisor to deliver improved advice. For the
consumer, the study will assess how cognitive computing on its own (without a
financial advisor) can deliver comprehensive and accurate advice comparable to
that of a human advisor. The study will assess various aspects of cognitive
1 Aligning Business Strategies and Analytics: Bridging Between Theory and Practice 5
computing, including but not limited to sentiment analysis, natural language pro-
cessing, predictive analytics, and prescriptive analytics.
The chapter by Schild and Riley follows and discusses how technology is
accelerating the growth of the financial advising industry at the same time that the
wealth accumulated by older generations migrates slowly to younger generations.
They argue that the preferred trust relationship will remain between human client
and human advisor but will be heavily machine augmented with analytics and big
data, delivered via the cloud.
In Chap. 4, Powell and Chandran use the case study of a leading fleet manage-
ment company (ARI) and explore the application of advanced analytics to various
facets of the industry and the company’s experience in aligning analytics with its
business strategy. Finally they outline the steps needed to implement a telematics
and analytics strategy in organizations and the importance of bridging the gap
between theory and practice.
Chapter 5 provides the context for analytics in practice within the biopharmaceu-
tical industry. Holder, Lee, Devpura, and Chandran provide an insightful view of
how the implementation of a supply chain blueprint model and value stream map-
ping has enabled tremendous cost savings at AstraZeneca. The importance of foster-
ing a two-way dialogue between members of the business community and educators
and introducing new programs like the Future Leaders program and Supply Chain
Boards in bridging the gap between theory and practice through meaningful part-
nerships is also discussed.
In Chap. 6, Shah, Gochtovtt, and Balini offer real-world examples of how project
management professionals tackle big data challenges in a rapidly evolving, data-
rich environment. Simultaneously, project management establishes a bridge between
business and academia as they both recognize the joint necessity to develop highly
trained project managers to utilize the powerful and cutting edge analytical tools
available to create value. This is followed by Larsen who explores the application of
agile methodologies and principles to business analytics project delivery.
Phillips-Wren and McKniff discuss the operational benefits that can be gained by
implementing real-time, big data analytics in a healthcare setting and the concomi-
tant influence of organizational culture on adoption of the technology. They demon-
strate these benefits by investigating patient-physician interactions in a large medical
practice at WellSpan Health and compare the observed workflow with a modified
one made possible with a big data, real-time analytics platform.
Chapter 9 by Poorani and Sullivan provide a case study on human capital analyt-
ics and investigate if such analytics add new outlooks beyond the usual metrics used
by lodging enterprises. In addition, the case study provides measures that help man-
agement identify and address inefficiencies, as well as the productivity of its work
force, with the goal of improving resource allocation.
6 M. Anandarajan and T. D. Harrison
In Chap. 10, Mendoza reviews the opportunities and potential shortfall influencing
the impact of business intelligence and analytics services for a company’s internal
use. He describes three strategies for providing these services internally and explores
issues of importance in the shaping of current demand and of future offerings by
Web-based providers. He concludes the section by discussing opportunities for the
development of academic curricula and research that would offer better training to
students, improve recruiting outcomes for organizations, and better address topics
of current and strategic importance to the firm.
Duke and Ashraf in Chap. 11 draw attention to how new media marketing and
analytics has fostered new insights about the customer journey, such as the creation
of the loyalty loop and the need for alignment in marketing strategy. The implica-
tions for analytics education are also examined in the chapter with recommenda-
tions for curricula shifts and training as they relate to higher demand for and a
shortage of qualified graduates.
In the final chapter, Kasat and Chandran discuss how data and analytics are play-
ing a revolutionary role in strategy development in the chemical industry. This paper
provides an overview of the challenges confronting the chemical industry and the
opportunities to transform the industry by aligning data analytics and strategy.
Using the case study of DuPont, they provide an example of how applying data and
analytics to its precision agricultural technology increased yields and improved
productivity.
Conclusion
References
Agarwal, S. (2017). Why big data projects fail and how to make 2017 different. NetworkWorld.
Retrieved from https://www.networkworld.com/article/3170137/cloud-computing/why-
big-data-projects-fail-and-how-to-make-2017-different.html
Ahmad, S., & Pesch, M. (2017). Essential work skills and readiness: Perceptions of employers,
MBA students and undergraduates. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 21(1), 1–11.
Ajani, K., & Moez, S. (2011). Gap between knowledge and practice in nursing. Procedia-Social
and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3927–1931.
Aram, J. D., & Salipante Jr., P. F. (2003). Bridging scholarship in management: Epistemological
reflections. British Journal of Management, 14, 189–205.
Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Gartner (2015). Gartner survey highlights challenges to Hadoop Adoption. Gartner. Retrieved
from https://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3051717
Henke, N., Bughin, J., Chui, M., Manyika, J., Saleh, T., Wiseman, B., et al. (2016). The age of ana-
lytics: Competing in a data-driven world. McKinsey Global Institute. Retrieved from https://
www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Business%20Functions/McKinsey%20Analytics/
Our%20Insights/The%20age%20of%20analytics%20Competing%20in%20a%20data%20
driven%20world/MGI-The-Age-of-Analytics-Full-report.ashx
Press, G (2017). Six predictions for the $203 billion big data analytics Market. Forbes, January
20th. https://www.forbes.com/sites/gilpress/2017/01/20/6-predictions-for-the-203-billion-big-
data-analytics-market/#7ff208242083
Raelin, J (2007). Toward an epistemology of practice. Academy of Management Learning and
Education, 6, 495–519.
Wren, D. A., Halbesleben, J. R. R., & Buckley, M. R. (2007). The theory-application balance
in management pedagogy: A longitudinal update. Academy of Management Learning and
Education, 6(4), 484–492.
Part I
Business Analytics in Practice
Chapter 2
Cognitive Computing: Impacts
on Financial Advice in Wealth Management
R. Kliman
SEI Investments Company, Oaks, PA, USA
e-mail: rkliman@seic.com
B. Arinze (*)
Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
e-mail: arinzeob@drexel.edu
Many understand cognitive computing from the performance of IBM Watson’s vic-
tory over the best human players of the TV game Jeopardy. In the program, players,
including Watson, had to listen to questions in English, reason through to an answer
quickly, and provide an answer – also in natural language (also English).
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
Making Photographic Prints Glossy
Pictures printed on glossy, semi-glossy, or semimat paper may be
given a high gloss by the following method: Obtain a sheet of clean
glass, without scratches, and apply a solution of a piece of paraffin,
the size of a walnut, in one pint of gasoline. Use a soft cloth, and
when the glass is dry, rub until all traces are removed. Soak the
prints in water for 10 minutes and place them on the glass, face
down. Place a clean blotter over them and roll on it with a print roller,
to remove excess water and to give them a good contact with the
glass. Dry the prints in a warm place, preferably where there is a
draft.—M. E. Fuller, Detroit, Michigan.
Shaving-Brush Holder
A shaving brush is injured by permitting it to remain in the mug to
dry. It should be suspended with the hair down so that it may dry
thoroughly and quickly. A hook made from a piece of wire bent to
form a loop, with a pointed section at each side of it, may be made
easily. The loop should be of a size to fit the thin portion of the
handle, and the pointed ends of the wire are driven into the wall or
other support. A loop may be made at each end instead of pointing
the wire and the device fixed to the wall with two small screws
placed through the end loops.
How To Build
A Canoe
By Stillman Taylor
PART I
Specifications and List of Materials
STEM, 1 piece oak or ash, 6 ft. long and ³⁄₄ in. square.
KEELSON, (inside keel) 1 piece oak or ash 14 ft. long, 3¹⁄₂ in. wide, ³⁄₈ in.
thick.
GUNWALES, 2 pieces oak or ash, 16 ft. long, ⁷⁄₈ in. wide, ¹⁄₂ in. thick.
SEAT RISINGS, 2 pieces oak or ash, ¹⁄₂ in. square.
FENDERWALES, 34 ft. ¹⁄₂-in. half-round molding. Oak or ash best for hard
knocks.
OUTSIDE KEEL (may be omitted if desired), 1 piece oak, 14 ft. by 1 in. by
¹⁄₂ in. thick.
DECK BEAMS, 2 pieces oak or ash, 8 in. long, 1¹⁄₈ in. wide, ³⁄₄ in. thick.
SEAT FRAMES, 2 pieces oak or ash, 30 in. long, 3 in. wide, ³⁄₄ in. thick.
SEAT FRAMES, 2 pieces oak or ash, 12 in. long, 2¹⁄₄ in. wide, ³⁄₄ in. thick.
PLANKING, cedar or pine, 100 sq. ft., ¹⁄₈ in. thick. Best secured by
purchasing 25 ft. of 1-in. lumber, and having same dressed on two
sides to ¹⁄₈ in. thick, and in lengths of 12, 14 and 16 ft. This will give
the minimum amount of waste.
BACKBONE, 1 piece cedar or pine, any cheap stuff, 16 ft. long, 4 in. wide,
⁷⁄₈ in. thick.
MOLDS, 1 piece any cheap stuff, 16 ft. long, 1 ft. wide, ⁷⁄₈ in. thick.
RIBBANDS, 8 pieces any cheap stuff, 14 ft. long, ³⁄₄ in. wide, ¹⁄₂ in. thick.
RIBS, 360 running feet, cedar, 1³⁄₄ in. wide, ¹⁄₈ in. thick.
BREAST HOOKS OR DECKS, 1 piece cedar or oak, 32 in. long, 9 in.
wide, ³⁄₄ in. thick.
1 lb. 2-in. wire nails to make form for keel.
1 lb. ⁵⁄₈-in. copper clout nails, for fastening ribs.
¹⁄₂ lb. ³⁄₄-in. copper clout nails, for fastening seat risings.
18 1¹⁄₄-in. No. 8 brass screws, for fastening decks and deck beams.
24 1-in. No. 6 brass screws, for fastening seats.
4 lb. patent marine glue to cement canvas to planking.
3 oz. No. 2 ounce copper tacks to fasten canvas with.
11³⁄₄ yd. No. 6 ounce canvas for covering hull.
1 lb. ³⁄₈-in. copper tacks to fasten planking to ribs.
A good way to lay out the backbone accurately is first to mark the
total length, making the lower edge 1 in. longer than represented in
Fig. 1, then measure along the top edge exactly 22¹⁄₄ in., and run a
pencil line across. From this line measure off ³⁄₄ in. and draw a
second line across the width of the board parallel with the first. This
space represents the thickness of the mold, and it is marked 1.
Measure off 23¹⁄₄ in. and make two parallel lines as before and
number it 2, measure another 23¹⁄₄-in. length and number it 3. Begin
measuring from the opposite end of the board as in the first instance,
22¹⁄₄ in. and give it number 1, then mark off 2 and 3 the same as for
the end already marked. The board is then cut off at the bevel mark
at each end.
The molds which give the form to the hull are shown and
numbered in the order that they are fastened to the backbone. To get
out No. 1 mold draw a rectangle on a sheet of stiff paper exactly
13⁵⁄₈ in. long and 11 in. wide as shown in Fig. 2. Run cross lines to
divide it in quarters and mark out the center mortise for the
backbone, which is 5 in. deep and ⁷⁄₈ in. wide. Measure 4 in. toward
each side from the outside edge of the backbone mortise and mark
the mortises for receiving the gunwales, which are 1⁵⁄₈ in. long and
³⁄₄ in. wide or deep. To obtain the correct bilge curve lay the rule on
the bottom line and measure off exactly 1 in. to the left of the center
dividing line and make dot 0. Measure 2³⁄₄ in. farther to the left, to A;
turn the rule at right angles and measure 2¹⁄₈ in. inside the line and
make dot 1. Measure 1¹⁄₂ in. to the left of A, turn rule at right angles
and measure up the sheet exactly 4⁷⁄₈ in. and make dot 2, which will
be ¹⁄₄ in. inside of the left vertical line. On the center horizontal line,
which is 1¹⁵⁄₁₆ in. above dot 2, mark dot 3, ¹⁄₁₆ in. from the left vertical
line. Measure off 2 in. above the horizontal center line and make dot
4 on the vertical line. The space between these two dots is the
widest part of the bilge curve. Lay the rule on the bottom line of the
gunwale mortise and measure off ³⁄₁₆ in. from the outside line and
make dot 5. Pencil the angle from dot to dot and draw in the full
curve. Cut out the half section, fold on the vertical center line, and
draw the right side.
Fig. 2
The molds No. 3, Fig. 4, are located near the center of the canoe
and are made a trifle wider. Make a rectangle 14³⁄₈ in. long by 12 in.
wide and draw cross line dividing it into quarters. Trace the half
mortises for the backbone, gunwale, and keel from the No. 2 mold
pattern. Lay the rule on the bottom line and measure off ¹⁄₂ in. to the
left from the center vertical line and mark dot 1, which is the
beginning of the bilge curve. At a point 2³⁄₄ in. to the left and ³⁄₄ in.
inside of the line place dot 2, and 2 in. to the left of this and 2¹⁄₄ in.
inside of the line place dot 3, then 1¹⁄₈ in. farther to the left turn the
rule at right angles and measure up 4 in. inside of the line for dot 4,
which is ¹³⁄₁₆ in. inside of the left marginal line. At a point 2 in. above
dot 4 make dot 5 on the marginal line and 2¹⁄₈ in. above it make dot
6. The space between gives the widest part of the bilge curve, with
dot 7 exactly ¹⁄₄ in. inside of the marginal line, measuring along the
bottom of the gunwale mortise. Trace the angle and from it run the
full curve and use this for a pattern for cutting out the other molds.
Fig. 4
This Mold is Located near the Centre of a Canoe and is Made a Trifle Wider
Mold No. 4 is placed amidships in the center of the canoe and only
one complete mold is required, as shown in Fig. 5. To make a
pattern draw a rectangle 15 in. long and 12 in. wide, and divide it into
four equal parts as before. From the No. 3 mold pattern trace in the
mortises for the gunwale, backbone, and keel. Lay the rule on the
bottom outside line and measure 2 in. from the center line to the left
at D and turn the rule at right angles and measure off ⁵⁄₁₆ in. inside of
the bottom line and make dot 1. Measure, from D, 1¹⁄₂ in. to E, turn
the rule up and measure off ⁵⁄₈ in. inside the line and make dot 2.
The dot 3 is 1¹⁄₂ in. farther to the left and 1¹⁄₄ in. inside the line and
dot 4 is 1 in. to the left of 3 and 2 in. inside of the line. The dot 5 is
1¹⁄₄ in. to the left of dot 4, and 4 in. inside of the bottom line, which
will bring it ¹⁄₄ in. inside of the left vertical side line. At a point 2 in.
above dot 5 make dot 6 on the outside vertical line and 1¹⁄₄ in. above
it make dot 7. The space between dots 6 and 7 gives the widest part
of the correct bilge curve. Exactly 3³⁄₄ in. above dot 7 and ¹⁄₄ in.
inside of the vertical side line make dot 8, which marks the beginning
of the bilge curve above the water line and at the gunwale mortise.
The curve of the canoe floor is quite flat, but not exactly a straight
line. Lay the rule on the bottom line and measure up, on the inner
edge of the keel mortise, ¹⁄₈ in., then 2¹⁄₂ in. to the left make a mark,
F, ¹⁄₁₆ in. inside the bottom line and a pencil line drawn between them
will enable one to trace the correct curve. Having cut out the pattern
make two wood forms exactly alike to have it complete, as shown.
After finishing the seven complete molds, fasten them securely
together by nailing a couple of battens across the halves.
Fig. 5
This Mold is Placed Amidships, in the Center of the Canoe, and Only One is
Required
Fig. 6
Straight-Grained Material must be Selected for the Stems, as It Is Necessary
to Bend Them to Shape
The ribbands are merely strips of wood, ³⁄₄ in. wide, ¹⁄₂ in. thick,
and 14 ft. long. Any cheap stuff will do because they are only used to
give the correct shape of the canoe curve while building it. Six
ribbands are necessary, and it is best to use eight lengths in order to
make sure that the ribs are bent at the required angle and that both
sides of the canoe are ribbed at the one uniform curve. For the
stems ash or oak, ³⁄₄ in. square, is used, and straight-grained
material must be selected since it is necessary to bend them to
obtain the requisite curve.
To make the pattern for the stem mold, shown in Fig. 6, draw a
rectangle, 24¹⁄₂ in. long by 12 in. wide, and divide it into four equal
parts. Lay the rule on the left side at the upper corner, at G, measure
down 1 in. and make dot 1. Lay the rule along the top horizontal line
and measure 2¹⁄₂ in. from G and make dot 2, then draw a pencil line
between them. From dot 1 measure along this line exactly ³⁄₄ in., and
make dot 3. From dot 2 measure straight down 1³⁄₄ in. to H, turn at
right angles and measure off ⁵⁄₈ in. to the right and make dot 4, and
make a pencil line from 2 to 4 as shown. From dot 2 lay the rule
parallel with the top horizontal line and measure off 9³⁄₄ in., turn at
right angles and measure down on the center line 2¹⁄₄ in. and make
dot 5.
Lay the rule at the upper right corner and measure down the
vertical line 2³⁄₄ in., turn the rule at right angles and measure off 3⁷⁄₈
in. and make dot 6. From the upper right-hand corner measure off
1⁵⁄₈ in. and make dot 7 exactly ¹⁄₄ in. inside the top horizontal line.
Again place the rule at the right-hand corner, measure down the
vertical line exactly 2 in. and make dot 8. Draw the line from dot 7 to
8, and ¹⁄₂ in. from dot 8, make dot 9. This gives the correct contour of
the stem where it joins the splice of the keel.
Fig. 7
It Is Not Necessary to Make a Paper Pattern for the Keel, or Keelson, as the
Piece is Merely Tapered Uniformly from the Center to Ends, and It can be
Drawn Direct on the Board
The greatest curve and width of the stem is at J on the lower line.
To obtain the correct curve begin at the upper left corner and
measure from dot 1 down the vertical line 4¹⁄₂ in. to K, turn the rule at
right angles and measure 1¹⁄₄ in. inside the line, and make dot 10.
The dot 11 is placed by measuring down from K exactly 3¹⁄₄ in. to L,
when the rule is turned at right angles and a length of 4 in. measured
off inside of the line. The dot 12 is located in the same manner by
measuring 2³⁄₄ in. below L and running 8³⁄₄ in. inside the line, as
shown.
To finish the irregular curve of the stem, measure from J at the
center of the lower horizontal line 2 in. to M, turn the rule up and
measure off ¹⁄₂ in. inside of the line, and make dot 13. The dot 14 is
made by measuring off 4 in. from M to N and turning the rule to a
point 3 in. inside the line, as shown. Then from point N measure to O
1¹⁄₄ in., and then measure up 4 in. to dot 15. From the dot 14 to 15
run a straight line. The dot 15 should be exactly 5 in. inside of the
right vertical line.
Allowance for the beveled splice of the stem to the inside keel
must now be made, and the beginning is to run a light pencil line
from dot 15 to dot 6. From dot 15 measure up ¹⁄₂ in., turn the rule at
P and make dot 16 exactly ¹⁄₄ in. to the left of the upright line. From
dot 16 a line is run to dot 8 which completes the angle of the curve.
The full curve is then easily traced in.
The inside keel, or keelson, is made exactly 13 ft. 11 in. long and
3¹⁄₂ in. wide in the center, which is, of course, amidships. It is
unnecessary to go to the trouble of making a paper pattern for this
because the keel is merely tapered uniformly from center to ends,
and this may be drawn on the surface of the board direct. The board
being 13 ft. 11 in. long and 3¹⁄₂ in. wide, it is only necessary to make
cross lines exactly in the center both ways. From the center measure
1 ft. toward one end and make the width at that point 3¹⁄₂ in.
Measure 1 ft. farther along, and again make the width 3¹⁄₂ in. as
before. Continue in this manner, making the third station 3¹⁄₄ in.; the
fourth, 2⁵⁄₈ in.; the fifth, 2 in.; the sixth, 1¹⁄₄ in., and the width at the
ends ¹⁵⁄₁₆ in. This detail is well shown in Fig. 7. Bend the stem on the
mold and fasten it to the keel by means of a couple of ³⁄₄-in. No. 10
screws at each end.
Fig. 8
The Ribs are Fastened to the Outside of the Keelson and are Curved under
the Ribbands
The ribs are best made of cedar, cut from the same material as the
planking. They are 1³⁄₄ in. wide and ¹⁄₈ in. thick. It is a good plan to
saw out several long lengths and cut them off as required, the length
being determined by measuring from gunwale to gunwale around the
curve over the ribbands. The ribs are put in under the ribbands, and
the thickness of the latter will allow sufficient wood for making a good
fit at the sheer line. The gunwales are two straight strips, 16 ft. long,
⁷⁄₈ in. wide, and ¹⁄₂ in. thick.
Fig. 9
The Bent Stem is Fastened to the Keel with Screws at Both Ends
Having made all the material ready, the work of setting up the
canoe may begin, and as it is built upside down, place the backbone
on boxes, about 1 ft. or more above the floor, and place the molds in
the numbered places on the backbone, allowing the backbone to rest
upon the bottom of the mortises cut in the top of the molds. Study
Figs. 8 and 9 before beginning the work of setting up the hull.
True up the molds with a square and fasten them firmly by
toenailing them to the backbone. Put the keelson in place, allowing it
to fit down in the mortises cut in the molds to receive it. Take
particular care that the stems are a good fit with the angle of the
backbone at the ends, then fasten by nailing through the top edge of
the mold into the stems. As shown in the stem-mold drawing, Fig. 6,
the splice where the stem fits the keelson must be cut out after it is
bent into place. This is easily done by marking around the outside
edge of the stem and then beveling from the inside on each side.
The outer edge is left about ¹⁄₈ in. wide, and the bevel runs out to the
width of the keel at the lower end.
The gunwales are next put on at the sheer line, and fastened to
the molds and stems, leaving sufficient of the nails exposed to make
them easily withdrawn later on. The four ribbands are then put on
each side, at equal distances apart, between the gunwale and keel,
or at 5-in. centers, measuring from the keel up toward the gunwale.
Fasten the ribbands by driving 1¹⁄₄-in. brads through them into the
mold. Measure off the keel for the ribs, which should be put on 3 in.
apart, measuring from the centers. The ribs are fastened to the
outside of the keelson and are curved under the ribbands. Fasten
each rib to the keel by means of two ⁵⁄₈-in. copper clout nails, then
spring them into place and fasten to the gunwales. Put in all the ribs
in the same way, spacing them so that a rib will be placed over each
mold. When all the ribs are put in, remove the ribbands, and begin
planking the hull.
The seat risings are simply straight sticks, ¹⁄₂ in. square, and are
fastened on the inside for the seats to rest upon. They are about 4
in. below the gunwale. Oak or ash is the best material, and the
length is 14 ft. To fasten in place, first bore a small hole and then nail
through the planking and ribs, and clinch on the inside of the rising.
Fig. 10
The Seat Frame may be Caned, or a Canvas Seat Tacked On, as Preferred
The deck beams are merely straight pieces, about 8 in. long, 1¹⁄₈
in. wide, and ³⁄₈ in. thick. These are notched at the ends as shown in
Fig. 11, so that they will come up and wedge against the sides of the
gunwales about ¹⁄₂ in. Put them in by boring a hole through the
gunwale and fasten with a 1¹⁄₄-in. No. 10 screw at each end. Two are
required, one at each end.
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
The Shape of the Deck or Breast Hooks and the Beams That Support Them
The deck, or breast, hooks are made 16 in. long by 8 in. wide and
of the shape shown in Fig. 12. To fasten them in place bore three