Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook Bio Inspired Polymers Nico Bruns Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Bio Inspired Polymers Nico Bruns Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-chemistry-of-bio-based-
polymers-johannes-karl-fink/
https://textbookfull.com/product/innovations-in-bio-inspired-
computing-and-applications-ajith-abraham/
https://textbookfull.com/product/towards-bio-based-flame-
retardant-polymers-1st-edition-rodolphe-sonnier/
https://textbookfull.com/product/bio-inspired-algorithms-in-pid-
controller-optimization-first-edition-ashour/
Biological and Bio inspired Nanomaterials Properties
and Assembly Mechanisms Sarah Perrett
https://textbookfull.com/product/biological-and-bio-inspired-
nanomaterials-properties-and-assembly-mechanisms-sarah-perrett/
https://textbookfull.com/product/human-modelling-for-bio-
inspired-robotics-mechanical-engineering-in-assistive-
technologies-1st-edition-jun-ueda/
https://textbookfull.com/product/bio-inspired-fault-tolerant-
algorithms-for-network-on-chip-1st-edition-muhammad-athar-javed-
sethi-author/
https://textbookfull.com/product/bio-inspired-algorithms-for-
data-streaming-and-visualization-big-data-management-and-fog-
computing-simon-james-fong/
https://textbookfull.com/product/a-new-bio-inspired-optimization-
algorithm-based-on-the-self-defense-mechanism-of-plants-in-
nature-camilo-caraveo/
Published on 15 September 2016 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781782626664-FP001
Bio-inspired Polymers
View Online
Editor-in-Chief:
Professor Ben Zhong Tang, The Hong Kong University of Science and
Published on 15 September 2016 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781782626664-FP001
Series Editors:
Professor Alaa S. Abd-El-Aziz, University of Prince Edward Island, Canada
Professor Stephen Craig, Duke University, USA
Professor Jianhua Dong, National Natural Science Foundation of China,
China
Professor Toshio Masuda, Shanghai University, China
Professor Christoph Weder, University of Fribourg, Switzerland
Bio-inspired Polymers
Published on 15 September 2016 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781782626664-FP001
Edited by
Nico Bruns
University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
Email: nico.bruns@unifr.ch
and
Andreas F. M. Kilbinger
University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
Email: andreas.kilbinger@unifr.ch
Published on 15 September 2016 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781782626664-FP001 View Online
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of research for non-commercial purposes or
for private study, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and
Patents Act 1988 and the Copyright and Related Rights Regulations 2003, this publication
may not be reproduced, stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without
the prior permission in writing of The Royal Society of Chemistry, or in the case of
reproduction in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing
Agency in the UK, or in accordance with the terms of the licences issued by the appropriate
Reproduction Rights Organization outside the UK. Enquiries concerning reproduction
outside the terms stated here should be sent to The Royal Society of Chemistry at the
address printed on this page.
The RSC is not responsible for individual opinions expressed in this work.
The authors have sought to locate owners of all reproduced material not in their own
possession and trust that no copyrights have been inadvertently infringed.
Printed in the United Kingdom by CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY, UK
Published on 15 September 2016 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781782626664-FP007
Preface
Life on earth has been evolving for the last 3–4 billion years, in which time it
has developed a level of complexity that is most challenging to understand.
With major breakthroughs in physics and chemistry in the last century, it is
the advances in biological sciences that are gaining momentum in this
century. The insights gained into the inner workings of the living world have
always inspired scientists from bordering disciplines to copy or mimic
nature in abiotic systems. Engineers have long been inspired by the
macroscopic living world and have developed bio-inspired technologies
ranging from Velcro to wing design for aeroplanes to advanced robotics. Bio-
inspiration and biomimetics often go hand-in-hand. While the latter term
describes the direct replication of biological working principles in man-
made systems, bio-inspiration usually refers to a more general translation of
molecular, microscopic, and macroscopic structures and functionalities
from living systems into synthetic ones. On the molecular, and especially on
the macromolecular level, research into bio-inspired structures has been
growing exponentially over the last twenty years and has led to some major
scientific and technological breakthroughs, such as self-cleaning surfaces,
adhesives that provide strong bonding in wet conditions, adaptive and self-
reporting materials and synthetic tools for the preparation of sequence-
controlled polymers. Today, research into bio-inspired polymers is being
carried out at many research institutes worldwide. In fact, several of the co-
authors of this book are collaborating in a National Center of Competence in
Research (NCCR), a research instrument of the Swiss National Science
Foundation (SNSF), working on Bio-Inspired Materials. The number of
textbooks addressing this advanced topic, however, are few, and either cover
bio-inspired chemistry in a broad sense, or bio-inspired materials with a
strong focus on inorganic materials and hybrid materials. Nevertheless, a
vast body of literature deals with soft bio-inspired materials based on
vii
View Online
viii Preface
Preface ix
Contents
1.1 Introduction 1
1.2 General Concepts for Bioconjugation 3
1.3 Chemical Synthesis of Peptide– and
Protein–Polymer Conjugates 6
1.3.1 Coupling with Amines 6
1.3.2 Coupling with Thiols 7
1.3.3 Chemical Ligation by Oxime/Hydrazone
Formation 9
1.3.4 Staudinger Ligation 11
1.3.5 Azide–Alkyne Cycloaddition 13
1.3.6 Diels–Alder (DA) Cycloaddition Reactions 15
1.3.7 Chemistry with 1,2,4-Triazoline-3,5-diones
(TAD) 17
1.4 Chemoenzymatic Approaches 19
1.4.1 Transglutaminase (TGase) Catalyzed
Ligation 19
1.4.2 Sortase (Srt)-mediated Ligation 20
1.4.3 Enzyme-induced Functional Group
Modifications 20
1.5 Biotransformations 21
1.6 Conclusions and Future Perspectives 23
References 24
xi
View Online
xii Contents
Chapter 2 Glycopolymers 31
Laura Hartmann and Kira Neuhaus
2.1 Introduction 31
Published on 15 September 2016 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781782626664-FP011
3.1 Introduction 66
3.2 Sequence-controlled Polymers Prepared by
Chain-growth Polymerization 68
3.2.1 Anionic Polymerization 68
3.2.2 Cationic Polymerization 70
3.2.3 Controlled Radical Polymerization 72
3.2.4 Ring-opening Polymerization 77
3.2.5 Ring-opening Metathesis Polymerization 78
3.3 Sequence-controlled Polymers Prepared by
Step-growth Polymerization 79
3.3.1 Acyclic Diene Metathesis Polymerization 79
3.3.2 Click Step-growth Polymerization 81
3.3.3 Other Step-growth Approaches 81
3.3.4 Multicomponent Reactions 83
3.4 Sequence-controlled Polymers Prepared by
Multi-step-growth Polymerization 86
3.4.1 Conventional Iterative Synthesis 86
3.4.2 Protecting-group-free Iterative Synthesis 87
View Online
Contents xiii
Polymerization 94
3.5.2 Rotaxane-based Catalytic Machines 96
3.6 Outlook 96
References 98
xiv Contents
Contents xv
xvi Contents
Contents xvii
xviii Contents
Contents xix
xx Contents
Functionality 575
17.5.3 Sensors 576
17.5.4 Hydrogels and Cellulose Derivatives 576
17.5.5 Chitin 578
17.6 Conclusions 579
Acknowledgements 579
References 580
CHAPTER 1
1.1 Introduction
The synthesis of peptide– and protein–polymer conjugates offers the possi-
bility to integrate properties of biological macromolecules into synthetic
systems, thereby obtaining hybrid materials with unique functions.1–9
The synthetic polymers within these structures provide a versatile range
of properties,4 whereas the peptide or protein domain introduces highly
specific functions, ranging from enzymatic activity10 to specific interaction
capabilities or recognition,11 and to disease modifying activities
(Figure 1.1).12 The multidisciplinary field of creating bioconjugates gives
access to a variety of materials for application in materials science, bio-
technology, or pharmacology, where the bioconjugates act at the interface
between biology and synthetic materials.6–9
1
View Online
2 Chapter 1
Published on 15 September 2016 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781782626664-00001
result in very high yields and easily isolable products, while generating only
non-hazardous side products that can easily be removed afterwards. Besides
the copper(I)-catalyzed cycloaddition (CuAAC) between alkynes and azides
described independently by Sharpless24 and Meldal,25 a wide range of
ligation strategies have since been found to fulfill the criteria of ‘‘click’’
reactions.23 Of these (in addition to CuAAC), the strain-promoted azide–
alkyne cycloaddition (SPAAC), Staudinger ligation, oxime formation,
Michael-type additions and other thiol-ene reactions are among the most
frequently cited representatives.26 The advent of various highly efficient
reactions has also proved advantageous for the preparation of peptide– and
protein–polymer conjugates; these synthetic strategies offer versatile
opportunities in the fields of materials science and biomedicine, where they
are being applied widely.26,27
In conjunction with the emerging ‘‘click’’ reactions in this century, sci-
entists have focused on the development of innovative strategies to design
more complex structures.6–9 The rich world of chemical ligation tools, which
have traditionally been used for protein modification, has extensively been
reviewed.1,4,5,10,12,28–32 This book chapter will mainly provide an overview of
the last decade’s progress over the preparation of functional bioconjugates,
also referred to as ‘‘post-click’’ methods.8 After a brief survey of various well-
established and widely used ligation techniques, we will focus on novel types
of chemistry as well as chemoenzymatic approaches and biotransformations
to create functional bioconjugates using enzymatically catalyzed reactions.
Finally, recent advances in this field will be described to provide insight into
potential future directions for the preparation of functional peptide– and
protein–polymer conjugates.
4 Chapter 1
Published on 15 September 2016 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781782626664-00001
Figure 1.2 Synthetic strategies for synthesis of peptide– and protein–polymer conju-
gates (PDB: 3V03).34 The ‘‘grafting to’’ approach, where a polymer bearing
reactive groups is attached to a biomacromolecule (a); the ‘‘grafting from’’
strategy, where an initiating moiety is introduced to a peptide or protein,
enabling the polymerization from the specific site of the biomacro-
molecule (b); and the ‘‘grafting through’’ method, which exploits the
(co)polymerization of macromonomers containing a peptide or protein
domain (c).7
side reactions.
One of the first examples following the ‘‘grafting from’’ approach was
the preparation of a protein–polymer conjugate composed of BSA and
poly(N–isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM).47 The modification of the protein
with a maleimide-functionalized chain transfer agent (CTA) enabled
the RAFT polymerization of NIPAM, resulting in a thermoresponsive
bioconjugate.
The ‘‘grafting through’’ approach implies the incorporation of a poly-
merizable group into the biomacromolecule, allowing for copolymerization
with synthetic monomer units. This results in a bioconjugate product with a
comb-like structure, where a certain number of the polymer side chains
contain peptide or protein moieties (Figure 1.2c).22,31 Compared to the
concept of ‘‘grafting to’’, the strategy avoids side reactions and low coupling
efficiencies due to the attachment of peptides or proteins to monomers
before the polymerization process, at which stage purification is easier.31 By
comparison, the ‘‘grafting through’’ method is less modular than the
‘‘grafting to’’ strategy. In the ‘‘grafting to’’ approach, theoretically, any peptide
containing a suitable reactive group can be coupled to a well-defined pre-
cursor polymer to produce different products with, e.g., different degrees of
functionalization or with different peptides, etc. For the ‘‘grafting through’’
method, optimized polymerization conditions have to be found for each new
monomer and the average length will not be precisely reproducible.
The first application using the ‘‘grafting through’’ approach was the syn-
thesis of a thermoresponsive antibody–polymer conjugate described in
1987.48 A more recent example deals with the incorporation of fibrinogen in
a protein–polymer conjugate. Pluronic F127 was end-group-modified with an
acrylate moiety on one side, while the other was coupled to fibrinogen.49
The acrylate moiety was used for UV-activated free-radical polymerization.
Since many of the fibrinogen molecules were functionalized with multiple
Pluronic F127 moieties, polymerization triggered cross-linking, yielding a
thermoresponsive hydrogel.
Beyond these three main concepts, the inverse bioconjugation approach
offers another strategy to connect peptides or proteins with synthetic poly-
mers. Using a solid support, which is preloaded with a polymer block, the
biological molecule can be assembled in a stepwise fashion through solid-
phase synthesis. Mutter and coworkers first showed the attachment of PEO
to a poly(styrene) resin via a benzyl ether linker.50 This concept was finally
developed further by Bayer and Rapp leading to a commercially available
PAP resin, which is widely applied in solid-phase peptide synthesis.51 In
a similar approach, Lutz, Börner, and coworkers demonstrated the prepar-
ation of cleavable and non-cleavable soluble polystyrene supports by ATRP
for the liquid-phase synthesis of peptide–polymer conjugates.52
View Online
6 Chapter 1
Figure 1.4 Diethyl squarate end-group functionalized PEO used for the squaric
ester-mediated PEGylation of BSA58 (PDB: 3V03).34
8 Chapter 1
Published on 15 September 2016 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781782626664-00001
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.F.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in
paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of
other ways including checks, online payments and credit card
donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.