Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Download textbook Coherent Light Matter Interactions In Monolayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenides 1St Edition Edbert Jarvis Sie Auth ebook all chapter pdf
Download textbook Coherent Light Matter Interactions In Monolayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenides 1St Edition Edbert Jarvis Sie Auth ebook all chapter pdf
Monolayer Transition-Metal
Dichalcogenides 1st Edition Edbert
Jarvis Sie (Auth.)
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://textbookfull.com/product/coherent-light-matter-interactions-in-monolayer-transit
ion-metal-dichalcogenides-1st-edition-edbert-jarvis-sie-auth/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
https://textbookfull.com/product/two-dimensional-transition-
metal-dichalcogenides-1st-edition-alexander-v-kolobov/
https://textbookfull.com/product/transition-metal-catalyzed-
furans-synthesis-transition-metal-catalyzed-heterocycles-
synthesis-series-1st-edition-wu/
https://textbookfull.com/product/transition-metal-catalyzed-
pyridine-synthesis-transition-metal-catalyzed-heterocycle-
synthesis-series-1st-edition-wu/
https://textbookfull.com/product/spectral-methods-in-transition-
metal-complexes-1st-edition-k-sridharan/
Handbook of metal-microbe interactions and
bioremediation 1st Edition Das
https://textbookfull.com/product/handbook-of-metal-microbe-
interactions-and-bioremediation-1st-edition-das/
https://textbookfull.com/product/transition-metal-catalyzed-
benzofuran-synthesis-xiao-feng-wu/
https://textbookfull.com/product/light-matter-interaction-
physics-and-engineering-at-the-nanoscale-second-edition-nunes/
https://textbookfull.com/product/handbook-of-transition-metal-
polymerization-catalysts-2ed-second-edition-hoff-raymond-e-ed/
https://textbookfull.com/product/transition-metal-catalyzed-
pyrimidine-pyrazine-pyridazine-and-triazine-synthesis-xiao-feng-
wu/
Springer Theses
Recognizing Outstanding Ph.D. Research
Coherent Light-
Matter Interactions
in Monolayer
Transition-Metal
Dichalcogenides
Springer Theses
The series “Springer Theses” brings together a selection of the very best Ph.D.
theses from around the world and across the physical sciences. Nominated and
endorsed by two recognized specialists, each published volume has been selected
for its scientific excellence and the high impact of its contents for the pertinent field
of research. For greater accessibility to non-specialists, the published versions
include an extended introduction, as well as a foreword by the student’s supervisor
explaining the special relevance of the work for the field. As a whole, the series will
provide a valuable resource both for newcomers to the research fields described,
and for other scientists seeking detailed background information on special
questions. Finally, it provides an accredited documentation of the valuable
contributions made by today’s younger generation of scientists.
Coherent Light-Matter
Interactions in Monolayer
Transition-Metal
Dichalcogenides
Doctoral Thesis accepted by Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
Edbert Jarvis Sie
Stanford University
Stanford, CA, USA
Monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) such as MoS2 and WS2 are
prime examples of atomically thin semiconducting crystals that exhibit remarkable
electronic properties. These materials have generated an enormous amount of
interest in the quantum materials community because, like graphene, they possess
an additional valley degree of freedom (DOF) that has the potential to be used as an
information carrier in next-generation electronics. Unlike graphene, the presence of
broken inversion symmetry in these materials induces bandgaps in each valley that
can be selectively populated with carriers through optical excitation, even though
the two valleys remain to be energetically degenerate locked by time-reversal
symmetry.
Dr. Edbert Jarvis Sie’s thesis made several key contributions to our understand-
ing of light-matter interactions in these materials. By applying coherent ultrafast
optical spectroscopy, Dr. Sie was not only able to study the dynamics of excitations
in these systems but also to optically control their properties.
In particular, he has developed an optical technique to control the valley DOF.
To do this, the degeneracy between the two valleys must first be lifted by breaking
time-reversal symmetry. While applying a magnetic field should in principle
accomplish this task, experiments so far show merely 1–2 meV of valley energy
splitting with fields accessible in common laboratories. Dr. Sie used intense circu-
larly polarized light pulses that are tuned slightly below the bandgap to mimic the
effect of a magnetic field. The light pulse dresses the electronic states such that the
state repulsion between these dressed states leads to a valley-dependent energy shift
(now known as the valley-selective optical Stark effect). He measured the energy
splitting between the two valleys induced by the circularly polarized pump pulse
with a spectrally broadband probe pulse by recording the energy shift of the exciton
absorption peak.
By using this technique on monolayer WS2, he demonstrated that the exciton
energy level in each valley can be selectively tuned because the optical Stark effect
in this material also obeys the valley selection rules with circularly polarized light.
He was able to achieve an energy splitting of 18 meV, which is extremely large,
v
vi Supervisor’s Foreword
Semiconductors that are thinned down to a few atomic layers can exhibit novel
properties beyond those encountered in bulk forms. Transition-metal
dichalcogenides (TMDs) such as MoS2, WS2, and WSe2 are prime examples of
such semiconductors. They appear in layered structure that can be reduced to a
stable single layer where remarkable electronic properties can emerge. Monolayer
TMDs have a pair of electronic valleys which have been proposed as a new way to
carry information in next-generation devices, called valleytronics. However, these
valleys are normally locked in the same energy level, which limits their potential
use for applications.
This dissertation presents the optical methods to split their energy levels by
means of coherent light-matter interactions. Experiments were performed in a
pump-probe technique using a transient absorption spectroscopy on MoS2 and
WS2 and a newly developed XUV light source for time- and angle-resolved
photoemission spectroscopy (TR-ARPES) on WSe2 and WTe2. Hybridizing the
electronic valleys with light allows us to optically tune their energy levels in a
controllable valley-selective manner. In particular, by using off-resonance circu-
larly polarized light at small detuning, we can tune the energy level of one valley
through the optical Stark effect. At larger detuning, we observe a separate contri-
bution from the so-called Bloch-Siegert effect, a delicate phenomenon that has
eluded direct observation in solids. The two effects obey opposite selection rules,
which enables us to separate the two effects at two different valleys.
Monolayer TMDs also possess a strong Coulomb interaction that enhances
many-body interactions between excitons, both bonding and nonbonding interac-
tions. In the former, bound excitonic quasiparticles such as biexcitons play a unique
role in coherent light-matter interactions where they couple the two valleys to
induce opposite energy shifts. The latter are found to exhibit energy shifts that
vii
viii Preface
1. E.J. Sie, C.H. Lui, Y.H. Lee, J. Kong, N. Gedik, Large, valley-exclusive Bloch-
Siegert shift in monolayer WS2, Science 355, 1066–1069 (2017) (pdf)
2. E.J. Sie, J.W. McIver, Y.H. Lee, L. Fu, J. Kong, N. Gedik, Valley-selective
optical Stark effect in monolayer WS2, Nat. Mater. 14, 290–294 (2015) (pdf)
(Cover Story)
3. E.J. Sie, A. Steinhoff, C. Gies, C.H. Lui, Q. Ma, M. R€osner, G. Sch€onhoff,
F. Jahnke, T.O. Wehling, Y.H. Lee, J. Kong, P. Jarillo-Herrero, N. Gedik,
Observation of exciton redshift-blueshift crossover in monolayer WS2, Nano
Lett. 17, 4210–4216 (2017) (pdf)
4. E.J. Sie, C.H. Lui, Y.H. Lee, J. Kong, N. Gedik, Observation of intervalley
biexcitonic optical Stark effect in monolayer WS2, Nano Lett. 16, 7421–7426
(2016) (pdf)
5. E.J. Sie, A.J. Frenzel, Y.H. Lee, J. Kong, N. Gedik, Intervalley biexcitons and
many-body effects in monolayer MoS2, Phys. Rev. B 92, 125,417 (2015) (pdf)
6. E.J. Sie, J.W. McIver, Y.H. Lee, L. Fu, J. Kong, N. Gedik, Optical Stark effect in
2D semiconductors, Proc. SPIE 9835 (Invited Paper), Ultrafast Bandgap Pho-
tonics, 983,518 (2016) (pdf)
ix
Acknowledgments
First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor, Prof. Nuh Gedik, for his
mentorship and support. He has been a constant source of inspiration since I first
started my graduate studies. In fact, it was even before that. I remember our first
meeting at a conference in Boston, where he presented a real-time image of
crystalline lattice motion, which was an awe-inspiring moment for me. He has
been a tremendous support since day one, when I was given the opportunity to
design and build the extreme ultraviolet (XUV) beamline for ARPES in the lab as
well as the freedom to build the white light setup next to it. His vigor for innova-
tions in time-resolved experiments is always inspiring. Throughout my graduate
studies, he has been a true role model for how to be a good scientist and to search for
answers to questions like “So what?” in a perfectly well-stated manner. I also
learned that “no problem is too small, and no problem is too big.” He gave me
and other group members many opportunities to attend international conferences
with the intention that we could learn how to communicate our findings with new
people and meet fellow scientists in the field. Despite his busy schedule, he always
makes time to discuss with group members regularly through weekly group meet-
ings, bi-weekly subgroup meetings, and individual meetings. Apart from discussing
research, he has been a constant source of encouragement and guidance, chatting
with us about personal matters and our careers. Sometimes, I was left wondering
how one person can do so much in such little time, and can become as quick and
sharp minded as a laser while remaining gentle at all times. I sincerely thank Nuh
for every aspect of my graduate education.
I am very grateful to other members of my thesis committee, Prof. Liang Fu and
Prof. Pablo Jarillo-Herrero. Liang has been my theory advisor; many fundamental
explanations for my experiments are inspired by him. One of the many insightful
wisdoms he imparted to me is that the optical Stark effect can be extended to create
a topologically nontrivial phase of matter in monolayer TMDs. Discussing research
with him has always been exciting and stimulating, not because we know anything
more about the theory, but because he knows very well the reality about what the
experiments can do. Much of the theory I understand was patiently explained to me
xi
xii Acknowledgments
after I visited his office several times. He showed me how to use simple diagrams
and mathematical expressions that capture the essence of physics. Now I remember
to use Cartesian coordinates every time I face spherical harmonics problems.
Pablo has been my academic advisor at MIT, where he regularly checked on my
academic progress throughout my graduate studies. His office is like a holy and
respected temple where I can freely discuss my classes, research progress, and
academic career and seek his guidance. I always remember his words that it is better
to complete tasks one at a time rather than attempting to complete everything at
once. I sincerely thank Pablo for letting me have access to his labs to borrow optics
or to perform sample characterization with his group. Every time I invited his group
members out for lunch or dinner, I always feel grateful to be among such highly
skilled people capable of creating cool devices.
My learning and working experience in Gediklab has been very enjoyable
because of the highly spirited colleagues. I am very grateful to Yihua Wang (now
professor at Fudan University), who taught me “Gediklab 101” when I first joined
the group in August 2011. He constructed the ARPES system in the lab and taught
me how it works and how to use it. I learned how to use SolidWorks from him in
order to accurately design and assemble many ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) appara-
tuses for the new extreme ultraviolet (XUV) beamline in the lab. Since then, it has
become my favorite software to draw three-dimensional figures; some of them
appear in the last chapter of this dissert. David Hsieh (now professor at Caltech) has
always been inspiring, and he introduced me to many interesting material systems.
Timm Rohwer has been a great colleague that I had a real pleasure to work together
with and a good friend to have. He joined the group during my third year, and since
then, we have been working together to set up the XUV beamline for ARPES. He
has an infinite reservoir of energy and motivation, which constantly inspires
me. There is no lab equipment that he cannot fix. Zhanybek Alpichshev has been
a constant source of joy and inspiration in the office. I am very fortunate to share an
office with him. I learn something new almost every time I have a conversation with
him. There is no question that he cannot answer. Joshua Lui (now professor at UC
Riverside) taught me how to clearly write stories worth telling. He gave me very
helpful advice during my transition from a graduate student into a more devoted
professional in a later stage of my career.
I also enjoyed my discussions with former group members James McIver, Alex
Frenzel, Darius Torchinsky, Daniel Pilon, Fahad Mahmood, Byron Freelon, Inna
Vishik, Hengyun Zhou, Mahmoud Ghulman, and Steven Drapcho, as well as with
current group members Ozge Ozel, Changmin Lee, Emre Ergecen, Alfred Zong,
Anshul Kogar, Carina Belvin, Suyang Xu, Nikesh Koirala, Mehmet Yilmaz, Guy
Marcus, and Edoardo Baldini. They are very talented individuals and enjoyable to
work with in the lab. There were many good moments that we shared together,
which enriched my experience as a graduate student at MIT.
Outside our lab, I am very thankful to Prof. Yi-Hsien Lee (now professor at
NTHU, Taiwan) and Prof. Jing Kong for their expertise and generous support to
synthesize the high-quality monolayer TMDs that I used in all of my experiments.
My first encounter with Yi-Hsien in the corridor of MIT Building 13 resulted in a
Acknowledgments xiii
1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1 Monolayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenides (TMDs) . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1.1 Electronic Band Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1.2 Optical Selection Rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.1.3 Excitons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.2 Time-Resolved Spectroscopy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1.2.1 Coherent Light-Matter Interactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1.2.2 Quasi-equilibrium Dynamics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
2 Time-Resolved Absorption Spectroscopy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.1 Experimental Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
2.1.1 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
2.1.2 Laser Amplifier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
2.1.3 Optical Parametric Amplifier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
2.1.4 White Light Continuum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
2.2 Data Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
2.2.1 Kramers-Kronig Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
2.2.2 Maxwell’s Equations for Monolayer Sample . . . . . . . . . . . 22
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
3 Intervalley Biexcitons in Monolayer MoS2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
3.1 Intervalley Biexcitons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
3.2 Experimental Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
3.3 Experimental Results and Discussions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
3.3.1 Intravalley and Intervalley Scattering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
3.3.2 Signature of Intervalley Biexcitons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
3.4 Time-Resolved Cooling Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
3.5 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
xv
xvi Contents
bands touching at a single point [1]. This allows graphene to exhibit extremely high
electron mobility, which is a promising property in developing nanoscale electronic
applications. However, the gapless electronic structure in graphene makes it chal-
lenging to use this material for switchable electronics such as transistors. Various
approaches can be used to open a gap in graphene [2], for example, by placing
graphene above a particular substrate that breaks graphene’s sublattice symmetry.
However, the resulting gap induced this way is reported to be around 100 meV [3],
which is still rather small for practical applications.
Transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) comprise a family of II–VI semi-
conductors such as MoS2, WS2, MoSe2, and WSe2. These materials are layered in
structure, from which we can isolate a monolayer of TMDs through mechanical
exfoliation or chemical vapor deposition (CVD) growth method [4, 5]. Monolayer
TMDs have a lattice structure similar to graphene, but, unlike graphene, these
materials possess a semiconducting gap between 1 and 2 eV. The large gap in
this class of materials offers promising electronic applications based on
two-dimensional materials. Recently, a microprocessor based on a 2D semiconduc-
tor (MoS2) has been reported [6]. The device consists of 115 transistors comprising
all basic building blocks that are common to most microprocessors. While this class
of materials could be an important element for the development of future 2D
devices, they are found to have novel electronic and optical properties as we discuss
below.
The properties of monolayer TMDs were first studied through pioneering optical
measurements on monolayer MoS2 by Mak et al. [7] and Splendiani et al.
[8]. Monolayer MoS2 is a one-unit-cell-thick semiconductor with a graphene-like
hexagonal lattice of Mo and S atoms where the S-Mo-S layers are stacked in a
trigonal prismatic arrangement (Fig. 1.1a, b). It is a direct bandgap semiconductor
with an optical energy gap of 1.96 eV (10 K) at K and K0 valleys in the Brillouin
zone and a valence band splitting of 160 meV due to strong spin-orbit coupling
(SOC) (Fig. 1.2). Other monolayer TMDs have similar properties, but the magni-
tudes differ slightly, for example, monolayer WS2 has an optical gap of 2.1 eV at
300 K and a valence band splitting of 400 meV. Monolayer TMDs are promising
material systems for future low-energy electronics because it has a unique spin-
valley coupling and a strong Coulomb interaction.
Fig. 1.1 (a) Unit cell of monolayer 2H-MoS2 in a trigonal prismatic arrangement. This structure
lacks an inversion center. (b) Top view of monolayer 2H-MoS2
Fig. 1.2 Hexagonal Brillouin zone of monolayer MoS2. The band edges from conduction bands
(CB) and valence bands (VB) are located at the K and K0 points
general description should also apply to WS2, WSe2, and MoSe2 monolayers. The
band structure of monolayer MoS2 around the gap is well described by considering
the Mo-d orbitals and S-p orbitals. This material has a unit cell that forms a trigonal
prismatic coordination
around the Mo atom that splits its d orbitals into three
0
groups: A1 ðd z2 Þ, E dxy ; d x2 y2 , and E (dxz, dyz). The mirror symmetry along the z^
direction allows a hybridization between A1 and E orbitals, which constitutes the
gap opening at the K and K0 valleys in the Brillouin zone (Fig. 1.3). In the vicinity
of these symmetry points, the wave function of the bands is described by the
following symmetry-adapted basis functions:
1
jϕc i ¼ jd z2 i, jϕv i ¼ pffiffiffi d x2 y2 id xy ð1:1Þ
2
where |ϕci is the basis for conduction band and |ϕvi for valence band and the sign
denotes the K or K0 valley index. The two-band Hamiltonian of monolayer MoS2
4 1 Introduction
Fig. 1.3 Atomic orbital projection of band structures for monolayer MoS2 from first-principle
calculations, without spin-orbit coupling. Fermi energy is set to zero. Symbol size is proportional
to its contribution to corresponding state. (a) Contributions from Mo-d orbital. (b) Total contri-
butions from p orbitals, dominated by S atoms. (c) Total s orbitals (Figure is obtained from Ref.
[10])
mimics that of graphene because both systems have similar symmetry properties,
except for the gap opening due to the differing on-site potentials between the Mo
and S sublattices and the strong spin-orbit coupling (SOC) originated from the
Mo-d orbitals:
Δ σbz 1
H^ ¼ at kx σbx þ ky σby þ σbz λ s^z ð1:2Þ
2 2
where a is the lattice constant, t the hopping integral, k the wave vector, σb the Pauli
matrices for the two basis functions, Δ the energy gap, 2λ the spin splitting at the top
0
of the valence band caused by the SOC interaction H ¼ λL S (ml ¼ 2, ms ¼ 1/2),
and s^z the Pauli matrices for the electron’s spin.
There are three important features that distinguish monolayer MoS2 from
graphene. First, the resulting electronic structure is described by a massive Dirac
fermion due to the finite gap in the second term. This allows an interband electronic
transition at the K and K0 valleys that can be induced through an optical excitation
in the visible regime. Second, the two valleys possess finite and opposite Berry
curvatures owing to the lack of crystalline inversion symmetry. This gives rise to
distinct optical selection rules, which we will discuss further in the next section.
Third, the SOC contribution in the third term leads to a large spin splitting at the
valence band top (160 meV). Meanwhile, the spin splitting at the conduction band
bottom is negligible in the first-order approximation because it is mostly composed
1.1 Monolayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenides (TMDs) 5
by dz2 orbital (ml ¼ 0). Its magnitude can be obtained by using a second-order
perturbation from the Mo-d orbitals and a first-order perturbation from the minor
S-p orbitals (ml ¼ 1) [12]. Although the conduction band splitting is much smaller
in magnitude (3 meV in MoS2), it plays an important role in the formation of stable
dark excitons in monolayers WS2 and WSe2 [13]; the splitting is larger
(20–40 meV) and inverted.
In monolayer TMDs, the two valleys couple differently with left- and right-
circularly polarized light [9, 14–16]. At K valley, optical transition from the valence
band (VB) top to the conduction band (CB) bottom is induced exclusively by left-
circularly polarized light. At K0 valley, the optical transition is induced exclusively
by right-circularly polarized light. Such valley selection rules arise from the
different quantum numbers m associated to the bands at the two valleys
(Fig. 1.4). At K valley, the valence bands are assigned m ¼ 1/2 and +1/2 for the
spin-down and spin-up, respectively, while the conduction bands are assigned
m ¼ 3/2 and 1/2 for the spin-down and spin-up, respectively. Interband transi-
tions from VB to CB can occur through absorption of left-circularly polarized light
(σ ) that carries an angular momentum Δm ¼ 1, where we consider electric
dipole approximation that leaves the spin unchanged. At K0 valley, the quantum
numbers have the opposite signs with respect to the K valley because of time-
reversal symmetry. Hence, interband transition at K0 valley can occur through
absorption of right-circularly polarized light (σ +) with Δm ¼ + 1.
The above description can explain the origin of valley selection rules because the
quantum numbers are given. However, obtaining these quantum numbers is not as
straightforward as the addition of orbital and spin angular momenta in atoms.
Isolated atoms in free space have a full spherical symmetry that allows electron
orbitals to acquire magnetic quantum numbers m ¼ 0, 1, 2, 3, . . .. with no
limit. Meanwhile, the crystal lattice of monolayer TMDs has a space group D13h that
imposes a trigonal symmetry C3 at the K symmetry points, so the linear combina-
tion of atomic orbitals (LCAO) throughout the lattice must conform this symmetry.
This limits the effective quantum numbers m ¼ 0, 1, 2 (modulo 3) that can be
present in the system.
In order to obtain the quantum numbers of the conduction and valence bands, we
must find the eigenvalue γ α (α ¼ c,v) of the C3 rotation on the Bloch functions
C3ψ α ¼ γ αψ α. This should include both the constructing atomic orbitals and the
plane wave component of the Bloch functions, expressed as
1 X iKðrþδÞ
ψ α ðrÞ ¼ pffiffiffiffi e dα ðr R δÞ ð1:3Þ
N R
6 1 Introduction
γ αρ ¼ eiKðC3 δδÞ
1
γ dα ð1:4Þ
where δ is the Mo atom position with respect to the rotation center ρ and γ dα is the
eigenvalue about the center of atomic orbitals [11]. In short, the orbital quantum
number ml is obtained from γ ¼ exp(i2πml/3). The simplest example is given at ρ ¼
Mo(δ ¼ 0) where the lattice phase contribution is zero and hence γ cMo ¼ γ dc ¼ 1 and
γ vMo ¼ γ dv ¼ ei2π=3 . The conduction bands are assigned ml ¼ 0 at K and K0 valleys,
while the valence bands are assigned ml ¼ 1 at K valley and +1 at K0 valley. By
adding the spin contributions ms, we can obtain the total quantum numbers mj of
these bands (Fig. 1.5).
We emphasize that the quantum numbers associated with conduction and
valence bands depend on the choice of rotation center, but the upward optical
transition between the spin-conserving bands remains the same, i.e., Δm ¼ 1 at
K valley and +1 at K0 valley. This is a consequence of the lattice symmetry in
monolayer TMDs that also gives rise to the non-zero and opposite Berry curvatures
at the K and K0 valleys. Berry curvature can be viewed as the self-rotating motion of
the electron wave packet or the orbital magnetic moment, and the opposite Berry
curvatures between the K and K0 valleys give rise to the opposite selection rules at
the two valleys.
1.1 Monolayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenides (TMDs) 7
Fig. 1.5 The C3 rotation eigenvalues γ c,v [10] and quantum numbers of bands in monolayer MoS2,
specified for different rotation centers ρ¼ Mo, S, and h positions (see inset). The quantum numbers
inside the middle row are shown only for the band edges, i.e., spin-down at K valley and spin-up at
K0 valley.
1.1.3 Excitons
Upon photoexcitation, an electron will occupy the conduction band and leave a hole
in the valence band. They have opposite charges and can attract each other through
Coulomb interaction. This allows a formation of bound quasiparticle called an
exciton. Monolayer TMDs are atomically thin semiconductors; so electronic exci-
tation is confined within 2D structure similar to the situation in quantum wells.
There are two important consequences that differentiate the excitons in this system
and in the bulk. First, there is a strong spatial overlap between the electron and hole
orbitals in the z^ direction due to quantum confinement. Second, the electric field
between the electron and hole pair can penetrate outside the material where
screening is absent (Fig. 1.6a–c). These two features enhance the Coulomb attrac-
tion significantly and result in the large excitonic binding energy of 320 meV in
monolayer TMD WS2 as compared to 50 meV in bulk WS2 [17]. The binding
energies are determined through comparing the series of exciton energy levels
obtained experimentally and theoretically. Note that as the electron-hole separation
8 1 Introduction
Fig. 1.6 Interactions between electron and hole that form an exciton are mediated by Coulomb
attraction. (a) In bulk, the electric field is screened by the surrounding material. (b) In monolayer,
large fraction of the electric field penetrates outside the material into the vacuum where screening
is absent or to an appropriate substrate where screening can be varied. (c) The suppressed
screening in monolayer leads to a larger exciton binding energy with respect to the bandgap
(Figures are adapted and redrawn from Ref. [17])
increases, a larger amount of electric field between them penetrates outside the
material and the overall screening gets suppressed. This leads to a pronounced
deviation from the usual hydrogenic series of exciton energy levels.
The optical selection rules in the previous section are discussed in terms of
one-particle picture where Coulomb interaction between the electron and hole pair
is ignored. Note that the selection rules result from the symmetry properties in
monolayer TMDs. Since Coulomb interaction appears as 1/r with a full spherical
symmetry, the symmetry properties in monolayer TMDs are unaffected. Thus,
novel selection rules at the two valleys are maintained, and excitons can be created
in a valley-selective manner using circularly polarized light.
Monolayer TMDs have a pair of electronic valleys (K and K0 ) whose index can be
used as a new degree of freedom for next-generation valleytronics. Owing to the
optical selection rules, we can use left-circularly polarized light to promote charge
carriers at K valley to carry information with valley index of 1. However, since
the two valleys are energetically degenerate, these carriers can scatter from K valley
to K0 valley and carry the incorrect valley index of +1 (Fig. 1.7). Such intervalley
scattering introduces a valley index mixture throughout propagation until the
population between the two valleys reaches equilibrium. In order to use the valley
index for practical valleytronic devices, it is desirable to suppress the intervalley
scattering. There are two methods to follow up on this line: (1) split the energy
levels between the two valleys, and (2) identify the dominant intervalley scattering
mechanisms and suppress its scattering rate. In our approach, we use light-matter
interactions in a time-resolved manner to achieve this.
1.2 Time-Resolved Spectroscopy 9
Hybridizing light with electrons in materials can result in newly created photon-
dressed states or Floquet states with energy levels that are modified from their
original states. An effective hybridization can be achieved in materials that are
subject to a coherent light field so there exists a phase correlation between the
induced polarization and the incident light. Hence, the resulting hybrid quasiparti-
cle, when written using Bogoliubov transformation, can maintain well-defined
amplitude and energy. This is in a similar situation with the forced harmonic
oscillator, where the interaction energy is transferred periodically between light
and electrons in materials without energy loss. In practice, energy loss can occur
through incoherent interactions. This could be mediated by dissipative scattering
channels upon absorption of resonance light.
In order to suppress the absorption process, we use coherent light source (laser)
that is tuned off-resonance with the material system. Coherent interactions with
off-resonance light can be used to shift the energy levels of materials. As we will
discuss in later chapters, the energy shift (often called the “light shift”) can occur
through two mechanisms, the optical Stark shift and the Bloch-Siegert shift. These
processes can be used to split the energy level between the two valleys using
circularly polarized light that breaks time-reversal symmetry. This optical tech-
nique can offer a much larger energy splitting as compared to that of magnetic field.
In monolayer TMDs, excitons can be created at a specific valley and switched to the
other valley through intervalley scattering. The lifetime of this scattering process
can be measured using pump-probe spectroscopy, which can occur in
subpicosecond timescale. In this experiment, a left-circularly polarized pump
pulse is used to create excitons at K valley and no excitation at K0 valley. After
some time delay, exciton populations at K and K0 valleys are monitored using left-
and right-circularly polarized probe pulse. The intervalley scattering process can be
10 1 Introduction
References
1. A.H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N.M.R. Peres, K.S. Novoselov, A.K. Geim, The electronic
properties of graphene. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109–162 (2009)
2. S. Ryu, C. Mudry, C.Y. Hou, C. Chamon, Masses in graphenelike two-dimensional electronic
systems: topological defects in order parameters and their fractional exchange statistics. Phys.
Rev. B 80, 205319 (2009)
3. E. Wang et al., Gaps induced by inversion symmetry breaking and second-generation Dirac
cones in graphene/hexagonal boron nitride. Nat. Phys. 12, 1111–1115 (2016)
4. Y.H. Lee et al., Synthesis of large-area MoS2 atomic layers with chemical vapor deposition.
Adv. Mater. 24, 2320–2325 (2012)
5. Y.H. Lee et al., Synthesis and transfer of single-layer transition metal disulfides on diverse
surfaces. Nano Lett. 13, 1852–1857 (2013)
6. S. Wachter, D.K. Polyushkin, O. Bethge, T. Mueller, A microprocessor based on a
two-dimensional semiconductor. Nat. Commun. 8, 14948 (2017)
7. K.F. Mak, C. Lee, J. Hone, J. Shan, T.F. Heinz, Atomically thin MoS2: a new direct-gap
semiconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 136805 (2010)
8. A. Splendiani et al., Emerging photoluminescence in monolayer MoS2. Nano Lett. 10,
1271–1275 (2010)
9. D. Xiao, G.B. Liu, W. Feng, X. Xu, W. Yao, Coupled spin and valley physics in monolayers of
MoS2 and other group-VI dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 196802 (2012)
10. G.B. Liu, W.Y. Shan, Y.G. Yao, W. Yao, D. Xiao, Three-band tight-binding model for
monolayers of group-VIB transition metal dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. B 88, 085433 (2013)
References 11
11. G.B. Liu, D. Xiao, Y. Yao, X. Xu, W. Yao, Electronic structures and theoretical modelling of
two-dimensional group-VIB transition metal dichalcogenides. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44,
2643–2663 (2015)
12. K. Kośmider, J.W. González, J. Fernández-Rossier, Large spin splitting in the conduction band
of transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers. Phys. Rev. B 88, 245436 (2013)
13. X.X. Zhang, Y. You, S.Y. Zhao, T.F. Heinz, Experimental evidence for dark excitons in
monolayer WSe2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 257403 (2015)
14. K.F. Mak, K.L. He, J. Shan, T.F. Heinz, Control of valley polarization in monolayer MoS2 by
optical helicity. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 494–498 (2012)
15. H.L. Zeng, J.F. Dai, W. Yao, D. Xiao, X.D. Cui, Valley polarization in MoS2 monolayers by
optical pumping. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 490–493 (2012)
16. T. Cao et al., Valley-selective circular dichroism of monolayer molybdenum disulphide. Nat.
Commun. 3, 887 (2012)
17. A. Chernikov et al., Exciton binding energy and nonhydrogenic Rydberg series in monolayer
WS2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 076802 (2014)
Chapter 2
Time-Resolved Absorption Spectroscopy
This dissertation work emphasizes on the exciton energy shift that is induced by
femtosecond light pulses. At equilibrium, the exciton energy level in monolayer
TMDs sits in the visible regime, e.g., E0 ¼ 2 eV in monolayer WS2. In order to
detect this energy shift, we need a broadband probe pulse that is centered in the
visible spectrum. White light continuum generation is a nonlinear optical process
capable of producing such broadband light pulse between 500 and 700 nm
(hω ¼ 1.8 2.4 eV). In this chapter, we will discuss about time-resolved absorption
spectroscopy setup (or simply transient absorption) that utilizes white light con-
tinuum to probe the exciton energy shift in monolayer TMDs. In the first section, we
will show the overview of the transient absorption setup. In later sections, we will
discuss in more details about (1) laser amplifier, (2) optical parametric amplifier,
and (3) white light continuum generation. Finally, we will discuss about the data
analysis based on the optical physics of monolayer materials on a transparent
substrate.
2.1.1 Overview
One important aspect to consider when setting up a transient absorption setup is the
laser pulse energy. White light continuum generation is a nonlinear optical process
that requires femtosecond pulse energy of 3–5 μJ when using a transparent
nonlinear medium such as a sapphire glass. Although this requirement is easily
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
The Viceroy’s Memorial is chiefly interesting as an example of that
chief and unalterable sentiment which actuates the Chinese literati
and has been one of the strongest pillars of Manchu rule, namely,
that the Emperor is infallible, a sentiment based on the fact that
complete and unquestioning loyalty to the Throne is the essential
cornerstone of the whole fabric of Confucian morality, filial piety, and
ancestral worship. While deprecating the Imperial folly, the Viceroy is
therefore compelled to ascribe it to everyone but Her Majesty, and to
praise the Imperial wisdom and benevolence.
His Memorial is as follows:—
The diarist, Ching Shan, has described in detail the flight of the
Empress Dowager and Emperor from Peking, before dawn, on the
morning of the 15th August. From an account of the Court’s journey,
subsequently written by the Grand Secretary, Wang Wen-shao, to
friends in Chekiang, and published in one of the vernacular papers of
Shanghai, we obtain valuable corroboration of the diarist’s accuracy,
together with much interesting information.
Wang Wen-shao overtook their Majesties at Huai-lai on the 18th
August; for the past three days they had suffered dangers and
hardships innumerable. On the evening of the 19th they had stopped
at Kuanshih (seventy li from Peking), where they slept in the
Mosque. There the Mahommedan trading firm of “Tung Kuang yü”
(the well-known contractors for the hire of pack animals for the
northern caravan trade) had supplied them with the best of the poor
food available—coarse flour, vegetables, and millet porridge—and
had provided mule litters for the next stage of the journey. As the
troops of the escort had been ordered to remain at some distance
behind, so long as there was any risk of pursuit by the Allies’ cavalry,
their Majesties’ arrival was unannounced, and their identity
unsuspected. As they descended from their carts, travel-stained,
weary, and distressed, they were surrounded by a large crowd of
refugee idlers and villagers, eager for news from the capital. An eye-
witness of the scene has reported that, looking nervously about him,
the Emperor said, “We have to thank the Boxers for this,” whereupon
the Old Buddha, undaunted even at the height of her misfortunes,
bade him be silent.
Next day they travelled, by mule litter, ninety li (thirty-two miles),
and spent the night at Ch’a-Tao, just beyond the Great Wall. Here no
preparations of any kind had been made for their reception, and they
suffered much hardship, sleeping on the brick platform (k’ang)
without any adequate bedding. But the Magistrate of Yen-Ch’ing
chou had been able to find a blue sedan-chair for Her Majesty, who
had thus travelled part of the day in greater comfort. Also at midday,
stopping to eat at Chü-yung kuan, Li Lien-ying, the chief eunuch, had
obtained a few tea cups from the villagers.
On the 16th they travelled from Ch’a-Tao to Huai-lai, a hard stage
of fifty li. Some of the officials and Chamberlains of the Court now
joined their Majesties, so that the party consisted of seventeen carts,
in addition to the Old Buddha’s palanquin and the Emperor’s mule
litter. As the cortège advanced, and the news of their flight was
spread abroad, rumours began to be circulated that they were
pretenders, personating the Son of Heaven and the Old Buddha,
rumours due, no doubt, to the fact that Her Majesty was still wearing
her hair in the Chinese manner, and that her clothes were the
common ones in which she had escaped from the Forbidden City. In
spite of these rumours the Magistrate of Huai-lai, a Hupeh man (Wu
Yung), had received no intimation of their Majesties’ coming, and,
when the Imperial party, accompanied by an enormous crowd,
entered his Yamên, he had no time to put on his official robes, but
rushed down to receive them as he was. After prostrating himself, he
wanted to clear out the noisy and inquisitive rabble, but the Old
Buddha forbade him, saying, “Not so; let them crowd around us as
much as they like. It amuses me to see these honest country folk.”
Here, after three days of coarse fare, the Empress Dowager rejoiced
once more in a meal of birds’-nest soup and sharks’ fins, presented
by the Magistrate, who also furnished her with an outfit of woman’s
clothing and suits for the Emperor and the Heir Apparent, for all of
which he received Her Majesty’s repeated and grateful thanks.
It was here, at Huai-lai, while the Court was taking a day’s rest,
that Wang Wen-shao came up with them. He was cordially, even
affectionately, greeted by the Old Buddha, who condoled with him on
the hardships to which he had been exposed, and insisted on his
sharing her birds’-nest soup, which, she said, he would surely enjoy
as much as she had done after so many and great privations. She
rebuked the Emperor for not greeting the aged Councillor with warm
thanks for his touching devotion to the Throne.
From Huai-lai, Prince Ch’ing was ordered to return to Peking to
negotiate terms of peace with the Allies. Knowing the difficulties of
this task, he went reluctantly; before leaving he had a long audience
with Her Majesty, who assured him of her complete confidence in his
ability to make terms, and bade him adopt a policy similar to that of
Prince Kung in 1860.
Wang Wen-shao’s account of the first part of the Court’s journey is
sufficiently interesting to justify textual reproduction.