Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PDF Computational Homogenization of Heterogeneous Materials With Finite Elements Julien Yvonnet Ebook Full Chapter
PDF Computational Homogenization of Heterogeneous Materials With Finite Elements Julien Yvonnet Ebook Full Chapter
https://textbookfull.com/product/finite-elements-iii-1st-edition-
alexandre-ern/
https://textbookfull.com/product/finite-elements-ii-1st-edition-
alexandre-ern/
https://textbookfull.com/product/vibration-theory-and-
applications-with-finite-elements-and-active-vibration-
control-1st-edition-palazzolo/
https://textbookfull.com/product/finite-elements-theory-and-
algorithms-1st-edition-sashikumaar-ganesan/
Finite Elements I Approximation and Interpolation 1st
Edition Alexandre Ern
https://textbookfull.com/product/finite-elements-i-approximation-
and-interpolation-1st-edition-alexandre-ern/
https://textbookfull.com/product/numerical-differential-
equations-theory-and-technique-ode-methods-finite-differences-
finite-elements-and-collocation-john-loustau/
https://textbookfull.com/product/diffusion-nmr-of-confined-
systems-fluid-transport-in-porous-solids-and-heterogeneous-
materials-rustem-valiullin/
https://textbookfull.com/product/computational-finite-element-
methods-in-nanotechnology-sarhan-m-musaeditor/
https://textbookfull.com/product/computational-and-experimental-
analysis-of-functional-materials-1st-edition-reshetnyak/
Solid Mechanics and Its Applications
Julien Yvonnet
Computational
Homogenization
of Heterogeneous
Materials with
Finite Elements
Solid Mechanics and Its Applications
Volume 258
Series Editors
J. R. Barber, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann
Arbor, MI, USA
Anders Klarbring, Mechanical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping,
Sweden
Founding Editor
G. M. L. Gladwell, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
The fundamental questions arising in mechanics are: Why?, How?, and How much?
The aim of this series is to provide lucid accounts written by authoritative
researchers giving vision and insight in answering these questions on the subject of
mechanics as it relates to solids. The scope of the series covers the entire spectrum
of solid mechanics. Thus it includes the foundation of mechanics; variational
formulations; computational mechanics; statics, kinematics and dynamics of rigid
and elastic bodies; vibrations of solids and structures; dynamical systems and
chaos; the theories of elasticity, plasticity and viscoelasticity; composite materials;
rods, beams, shells and membranes; structural control and stability; soils, rocks and
geomechanics; fracture; tribology; experimental mechanics; biomechanics and
machine design. The median level of presentation is the first year graduate student.
Some texts are monographs defining the current state of the field; others are
accessible to final year undergraduates; but essentially the emphasis is on
readability and clarity.
Springer and Professors Barber and Klarbring welcome book ideas from
authors. Potential authors who wish to submit a book proposal should contact
Dr. Mayra Castro, Senior Editor, Springer Heidelberg, Germany, e-mail:
mayra.castro@springer.com
Indexed by SCOPUS, Ei Compendex, EBSCO Discovery Service, OCLC,
ProQuest Summon, Google Scholar and SpringerLink.
Computational
Homogenization
of Heterogeneous Materials
with Finite Elements
123
Julien Yvonnet
MSME Laboratory
Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée
Marne-la-Vallée Cedex 2, France
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
To my wife Cécile and to my sons, Quentin,
Nathan and Lucas.
Foreword
vii
viii Foreword
There are not many books on computational homogenization that start from the
basics and conclude with the state of the art. I think the author succeeded to put all
most important theory, assumptions, solution methods, and computational details in
this concise monograph. It is a fully self-contained book that can be used for
education and exploitation. The book is, therefore, unique in many ways. I am
convinced that it will serve as an educational guideline for some and an inspira-
tional source for others.
In recent years, a revolution has occurred in the field of material engineering. This
breakthrough is the possibility to design, predict properties, and even manufacture
materials not only with the help of experiments but also with computer science.
Until recently, determining mechanical properties of a material like stiffness or
strength was only accessible through mechanical testing. In that context, selection
or manufacturing of new materials with enhanced properties was a long trial–error
process, requiring deep experience and intuition about elementary phenomena and
influence of constituents. Due to the conjunction of several advances in
physical/mechanical modeling, computational capabilities, numerical/mathematical
methods, and the development of new manufacturing processes like 3D printing
equipment, it is now possible to predict with good accuracy the properties of a large
range of man-made materials like polymer/ceramic/metallic composites, concrete,
or nanostructured materials and manufacture them with controlled microstructures.
While analytical micromechanical models have successfully helped to predict
effective properties of heterogeneous materials for idealized microstructures,
computational methods, and computer capacities permit to go beyond restricting
assumptions and to consider realistic or architectured microstructures, with complex
behaviors like elastoplasticity, damage, microcracking, or phase change. Another
new possibility is to take into account several space or timescales, or several models
like atomistic and continuum.
However, while these developments are quite mature in the research community,
their transfer to industry is taking its first faltering steps. One reason is that many
difficulties still remain for reaching solutions to central problems to industrial
questions, like predicting damage from microcracking, prediction of fatigue, and
taking into account the complexity of microstructures with all their uncertainties in
materials like concrete. Another factor is that simulations related to complex
material microstructures still involve extensive computational resources in terms of
memory and times, and cannot yet be incorporated in fast user codes.
ix
x Preface
I would like to thank my group students and former postdocs who have carefully
helped to read this book and track typos and mistakes, and for producing some
of the figures: Jean-Luc Adia, Daicong Da, Darith-Anthony Hun, Jérome Kodjo,
Minh Vuong Le, Xiaoxin Lu, Nhu Nguyen, and Liang Xia.
I also thank all co-authors of the papers, which have been used to write some of the
chapters of this book: Anh Binh Tran (Hanoï University of Civil Engineering, Julien
Sanahuja (EDF), Qi-Chang He, Fabrice Detrez (Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée,
Ba Anh Le (Hanoï University of Transports and Communications), Nicolas Feld
(SAFRAN), Mustapha Karkri (Université Paris-Est Créteil) and Karam Sab (Ecole des
Ponts ParisTech). Fruitful discussions with colleagues from MSME (Multiscale
Modeling and Simulation group), Vincent Monchiet, Camille Perrot, Nicolas Auffray,
and Qi-Chang He are gratefully acknowledged.
My sincere acknowledgements to Prof. Marc Geers (Technical University of
Eindhoven) for kindly accepting to write the foreword of this book.
Finally, I thank the support of Institut Universitaire de France (IUF), especially
regarding the associated funded sabbatical period, which has been of invaluable
help to find time to write this book.
xi
Contents
1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1 Why Computational Homogenization? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 Brief Background and Recent Advances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.3 Industrial Applications and Use in Commercial Softwares . . . . . . . 3
1.4 Position of the Present Monograph as Compared to Available
Other Books on That Topic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 4
1.5 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 4
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 5
2 Review of Classical FEM Formulations and Discretizations . . . . . . . 7
2.1 Steady-State Thermal Problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.1.1 Strong Form of Equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.1.2 Weak Forms of Equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.1.3 2D FEM Discretization with Linear Elements . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.1.4 Assembly of the Elementary Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
2.1.5 Prescribing Dirichlet Boundary Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
2.2 Linear Elasticity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
2.2.1 Strong Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
2.2.2 Weak Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
2.2.3 2D Discretization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
2.2.4 Assembly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
3 Conduction Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
3.1 The Notion of RVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
3.2 Localization Problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
3.3 Averaged Quantities and Hill–Mandel Lemma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
3.3.1 Averaging Theorem: Temperature Gradient . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
3.3.2 Averaging Theorem: Heat Flux . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
3.3.3 Hill–Mandel Lemma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
xiii
xiv Contents
The need for materials with higher performances is a strategic issue in engineering.
Composite materials, i.e., combining at least two constituents with desired proper-
ties like mechanical resistance and lightness, have been developed and applied in
many fields of engineering, and are now routinely used in many applications, includ-
ing automotive industry, aircrafts, drones, biomedicals, wind turbines, sports, and
leisure, etc. (see reviews in [1–6]). On the other hand, heterogeneous materials are
found in many other engineering or science fields, such as cementitious materials
in civil engineering or biomechanics. More recently, the progress in manufacturing
techniques have allowed producing very complex materials like metallic foams (see
Fig. 1.1a), or even allowed producing materials with “on demand” microstructures
[7, 8] via 3D printing techniques, see Fig. 1.1b. Developing new materials involves
synthesis, manufacturing, and testing for certification. This process is long and costly,
and usually only involves a “trial and error” procedure, rather than a clear optimiza-
tion methodology.
The objective of computational homogenization is to provide a virtual model of
heterogeneous material, whose “effective” or “macroscopic” properties (i.e., defined
at the scale of the engineering applications) can be evaluated by a computer. In
that framework, computational homogenization is the operation, which provides the
equivalent effective properties of the material at the macroscopic scale (see Fig. 1.2).
The main advantages are that, given a digital definition of the microstructure, either
through experimental imaging [9], or from idealized geometry and information about
constituents behavior, the user can evaluate the effective properties and modify the
numerical microstructural model to optimize it. The other advantage is that it avoids
describing explicitly all heterogeneities in the material at the structural level, which
is simply not feasible with nowadays computers. This can lead to a drastic time
and costs saving regarding experimental testing and manufacturing. Even though
analytical estimates for homogenized properties of composites have been proposed,
Fig. 1.1 a 6061/Al2O3/22p composite foam used in Ferrari cars (courtesy of H.P. Degischer): three-
dimensional microstructure obtained by computed X-ray tomography [5]; b 3D printed materials
with “on demand” microstructure [8]
(a) (b)
1 In the present monograph, we will restrict the presentation to computational homogenization based
on finite elements. For techniques based on Fast Fourier Transform, the interested reader can refer
to [20].
4 1 Introduction
Several other very good books have been published on the topic of computational
homogenization (see e.g., [12, 39–42]). However, even though some portions about
basics of computational micromechanics can also be found in these monographs,
the author believe that its main content, aiming at presenting the main aspects of
computational homogenization from simple cases up to more complex problems
keeping in mind implementation details with finite elements, is original and fully
complementary with the mentioned references, which are more dedicated to advanced
research on that topic. The audience of the present book includes graduate students,
researchers, engineers, or professors. The book can be used for courses, research
projects, or for more in-depth understanding about the method. A minimal basis in
mechanics and mathematics is required to follow the main presented developments
and the book was thought to be as self-contained as possible.
1.5 Overview
References
1. Mouritz AP, Bannister MK, Falzon PJ, Leong KH (1999) Review of applications for advanced
three-dimensional fibre textile composites. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf 30(12):1445–1461
2. Ramasubramaniam R, Chen J, Liu H (2003) Homogeneous carbon nanotube/polymer compos-
ites for electrical applications. Appl Phys Lett 83(14):2928–2930
3. Ramakrishna S, Mayer J, Wintermantel E, Leong KW (2001) Biomedical applications of
polymer-composite materials: a review. Compos Sci Technol 61(9):1189–1224
4. Holbery J, Houston D (2006) Natural-fiber-reinforced polymer composites in automotive appli-
cations. JOM J Miner Met Mater Soc 58(11):80–86
5. Chawla KK, Chawla N (2014) Metal matrix composites: automotive applications. Encycl Auto-
mot Eng
6. Gay D (2014) Composite materials: design and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton
7. Kokkinis D, Schaffner M, Studart AR (2015) Multimaterial magnetically assisted 3D printing
of composite materials. Nat Commun 6:8643
8. Quan Z, Larimore Z, Wu A, Yu J, Qin X, Mirotznik M, Suhr J, Byun J-H, Oh Y, Chou
T-W (2016) Microstructural design and additive manufacturing and characterization of 3D
orthogonal short carbon fiber/acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene preform and composite. Compos
Sci Technol 126:139–148
9. Cnudde V, Boone MN (2013) High-resolution X-ray computed tomography in geosciences: a
review of the current technology and applications. Earth Sci Rev 123:1–17
10. Buryachenko V (2007) Micromechanics of heterogeneous materials. Springer Science & Busi-
ness Media, New York
11. Milton GW (2002) Theory of composites. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
12. Bornert M (2008) Homogenization in mechanics of materials. ISTE, Newport Beach
13. Auriault J-L, Boutin C, Geindreau C (2009) Homogénéisation de phénomènes couplés en
milieux hétérogènes. Hermès Science Publications
14. Torquato S (2001) Random heterogeneous materials: microstructure and macroscopic proper-
ties. Springer, Berlin
15. Suquet P (2014) Continuum micromechanics, vol 377. Springer, Berlin
16. Dvorak G (2013) Micromechanics of composites materials. Springer, New York
17. Li S, Wang G (2008) Introduction to micromechanics and nanomechanics. World Scientific
Publication, Singapore
18. Adams DF, Doner DR (1967) Transverse normal loading of a unidirectional composite. J
Compos Mater 1(2):152–164
19. Suquet P, Elements of homogenization for inelastic solid mechanics. In: Sanchez-Palenzia E,
Zaoui A (eds) Homogenization techniques for composite materials. Lecture notes in physics,
vol 272
20. Michel J-C, Moulinec H, Suquet P (1999) Effective properties of composite materials with
periodic microstructure: a computational approach. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 172:109–
143
21. Renard J, Marmonier MF (1987) Etude de l’initiation de l’endommagement dans la matrice
d’un matériau composite par une méthode d’homogénéisation. Aerosp Sci Technol 9:36–51
22. Feyel F (1999) Multiscale FE2 elastoviscoplastic analysis of composite structure. Comput
Mater Sci 16(1–4):433–454
23. Terada K, Kikuchi N (2001) A class of general algorithms for multi-scale analysis of hetero-
geneous media. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:5427–5464
24. Kouznetsova VG, Geers MGD, Brekelmans WAM (2002) Multi-scale constitutive modeling of
heterogeneous materials with gradient enhanced computational homogenization scheme. Int J
Numer Methods Eng 54:1235–1260
25. Geers MGD, Kouznetsova VG, Brekelmans WAM (2010) Multi-scale computational homog-
enization: trends and challenges. J Comput Appl Math 234(7):2175–2182
26. Geers MGD, Yvonnet J (2016) Multiscale modeling of microstructure-property relations. MRS
Bull 41(08):610–616
6 1 Introduction
27. Schroeder J, Labusch M, Keip M-A (2016) Algorithmic two-scale transition for magneto-
electro-mechanically coupled problems: FE2-scheme: localization and homogenization. Com-
put Methods Appl Mech Eng 302:253–280
28. Patel B, Zohdi TI (2016) Numerical estimation of effective electromagnetic properties for
design of particulate composites. Mater Des 94:546–553
29. Krushynska AO, Kouznetsova VG, Geers MGD (2014) Towards optimal design of locally
resonant acoustic metamaterials. J Mech Phys Solids 71:179–196
30. Escoda J, Willot F, Jeulin D, Sanahuja J, Toulemonde C (2011) Estimation of local stresses
and elastic properties of a mortar sample by FFT computation of fields on a 3D image. Cem
Concr Res 41(5):542–556
31. Yvonnet J, Gonzalez D, He Q-C (2009) Numerically explicit potentials for the homogenization
of nonlinear elastic heterogeneous materials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198:2723–2737
32. Coenen EWC, Kouznetsova VG, Bosco E, Geers MGD (2012) A multi-scale approach to
bridge microscale damage and macroscale failure: a nested computational homogenization-
localization framework. Int J Fract 178(1–2):157–178
33. Bosco E, Kouznetsova VG, Geers MGD (2015) Multi-scale computational homogenization–
localization for propagating discontinuities using X-FEM. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng
102(3–4):496–527
34. Oliver J, Caicedo M, Roubin E, Huespe AE, Hernández JA (2015) Continuum approach to
computational multiscale modeling of propagating fracture. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng
294:384–427
35. Clément A, Soize C, Yvonnet J (2013) Uncertainty quantification in computational stochastic
multiscale analysis of nonlinear elastic materials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 254:61–82
36. (2018) http://www.zset-software.com/
37. Digimat software. http://www.e-xstream.com/products/digimat/about-digimat
38. Terada K et al (2017) http://www.cybernet.co.jp/ansys/product/lineup/multiscale/en/
multiscale/
39. Zohdi TI, Wriggers P (2008) An introduction to computational micromechanics. Springer
Science & Business Media, New York
40. Ghosh S, Dimiduk DM (2011) Computational methods for microstructure-property relation-
ships. Springer, Berlin
41. Fish J (2013) Practical multiscaling. Wiley, New York
42. Forest S (2006) Milieux continus généralisés et matériaux hétérogènes. Presses des MINES
Chapter 2
Review of Classical FEM Formulations
and Discretizations
The objective of this first chapter is to recall the basics of Finite Elements for simple
problems, here, the steady-state and linear elasticity problems, in order to use it as
a solver for the localization problems required in computational homogenization in
the next chapters. We do not intend to provide a complete framework on FEM here,
but present a short introduction and practical aspects which can be used to directly
implement a FEM program. For more in-depth about FEM formulations, we refer to
classical books on Finite Elements such as [1–4] for linear problems and [5, 6] for
nonlinear problems.
where q is the thermal heat flux, r is a volume heat source, k is the second-order
thermal conductivity tensor, T denotes the temperature, and n is a unitary vector
normal to ∂Ω.
Multiplying Eq. (2.1) by an arbitrary function δT (x) with appropriate regularity prop-
erties (defined in more details in the sequel), and integrating over the domain Ω, we
obtain
∇ · q(x)δT (x)d Ω = r(x)δT (x)d Ω. (2.5)
Ω Ω
At this stage, we introduce the following property: let v a real-valued vector and
u a scalar, we have, using the Einstein’s convention:
∂ ∂vi ∂u
[vi u] = u + vi (2.6)
∂xi ∂xi ∂xi
As we have
q(x) · nδT (x)d Γ = q(x) · nδT (x)d Γ + q(x) · nδT (x)d Γ (2.11)
∂Ω ∂Ωq ∂ΩT
k∇T (x) · ∇ (δT (x)) = r(x)δT (x)d Ω + qn∗ (x)δT (x)d Γ (2.12)
Ω Ω ∂Ωq
with δT (x) ∈ S01 , S01 = θ |θ = 0 over ∂ΩT , θ ∈ H 1 (Ω) , where H 1 (Ω) denotes
the Sobolev space of integrable square derivative functions over ∂ΩT .
(a) (b)
Fig. 2.2 Mesh of a domain with linear triangular elements: a a coarse mesh; b a refined mesh
10 2 Review of Classical FEM Formulations and Discretizations
x
0
In this section, we describe the interpolation functions, also called “shape func-
tions” which are used to approximate the value of the fields within each element,
given their values at the nodes. Here, the case of 2D linear 3-node elements is pre-
sented.
In each element Ω e , given the temperatures at the nodes of the element T1 , T2 , T3
(see Fig. 2.3), the temperature can be expressed inside the element as
Ni (x) = ai + bi x + ci y, (2.14)
or
M1 α 1 = δ 1 . (2.19)
Employing the same procedure for condition (2.15b ) and (2.15c ) yields the linear
systems of equations: ⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤
1 x1 y1 a2 0
⎣ 1 x2 y2 ⎦ ⎣ b2 ⎦ = ⎣ 1 ⎦ (2.20)
1 x3 y3 c2 0
or
M1 α 2 = δ 2 , (2.21)
and ⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤
1 x1 y1 a3 0
⎣ 1 x2 y2 ⎦ ⎣ b3 ⎦ = ⎣ 0 ⎦ (2.22)
1 x3 y3 c3 1
or
M1 α 3 = δ 3 . (2.23)
Solving the systems (2.19), (2.21), and (2.23), we obtain the different coefficients
a1 , b1 , . . . , c3 . Note that, we did not present the computation of shape functions
through a reference element (see e.g., [2]). For linear elements, as the integration is
simple, this procedure is not necessary. Then, the temperature can be expressed in
each element as a function of nodal values of the temperature through:
⎡ ⎤
T1
T (x) = N1 (x) N2 (x) N3 (x) ⎣ T2 ⎦ (2.24)
T
3
N(x)
Te
or
T (x) = N(x)Te . (2.25)
or
∇T (x) = D(x)Te (2.28)
and
∇δT (x) = D(x)δTe . (2.29)
kD(x)Te · BδTe d Ω
Ωe
= N(x) · δT r(x)d Ω +
e
N(x) · δTe qn∗ (x)d Γ. (2.30)
Ωe ∂Ωqe
At this stage, we note that the scalar product can be expressed as matrix product
of a line and column vectors, i.e.,
ux vx vx
u·v = · = x yu u = uT v. (2.31)
uy vy vy
T
D(x)δTe kD(x)Te d Ω
Ωe
T T
= N(x)δTe r(x)d Ω + N(x)δTe qn∗ (x)d Γ. (2.32)
Ωe ∂Ωqe
Using (AB)T = BT AT :
T e T T
D(x)δTe kD(x)Te d Ω = δT D (x)kD(x)Te d Ω.
Ωe Ωe
Then,
2.1 Steady-State Thermal Problem 13
e T
δT DT (x)kD(x)d Ω Te
Ωe
Ke
e T T e T T
= δT N (x)r(x)d Ω + δT N (x)qn∗ (x)d Γ. (2.33)
Ωe ∂Ωqe
Using the arbitrariness of δTe , we obtain the following linear system of equations:
Ke Te = Qe (2.34)
with
K =
e
DT (x)kD(x)d Ω, (2.35)
Ωe
Qe = NT (x)r(x)d Ω + NT (x)qn∗ (x)d Γ. (2.36)
Ωe ∂Ωqe
where Ae is the area of the element e, and which can be computed from its nodal
coordinates as
1
Ae = |det (M1 )| , (2.39)
2
where M1 is given by (2.18) and det(M1 ) denote the determinant of the matrix
M1 . Note that for higher order elements (bilinear, quadratic …) and unstructured
meshes, Gauss integration must be performed on the reference element (see e.g., [2]
for more details). For the special case of piece-wise constant values of r(x) = r e in
each elements, the first term in (2.36) can be calculated analytically as
⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤
Ω e N1 (x)d Ω 1
r e e
A
NT (x)r e d Ω = r e ⎣ Ω e N2 (x)d Ω ⎦ = ⎣1⎦. (2.40)
Ωe N (x)d Ω 3 1
Ωe 3
14 2 Review of Classical FEM Formulations and Discretizations
1
3 5
Assuming piece-wise constant values of qn∗ (x) = qn∗e along each portion of ele-
ments boundaries subjected to the heat flux, the second term in (2.36) can be calcu-
lated analytically as
⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤
∂Ω e N1 (x)d Γ
∗e e 1
⎢
q
⎥ q ⎣1⎦,
NT (x)qn∗e d Γ = qn∗e ⎣ ∂Ωqe N2 (x)d Γ ⎦ = n (2.41)
∂Ωqe
2
N
∂Ω e 3 (x)d Γ 0
q
as N3 (x) = 0 over ∂Ωqe , where e is the length of ∂Ωqe (see Fig. 2.4).
Let us consider a simple illustration the mesh described in Fig. 2.5. The mesh is
composed of three elements Ω 1 , Ω 2 , and Ω 3 , and is associated with the connectivity
matrix (i.e., a matrix which provides on each line the nodes of each element):
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United
States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away
or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License
included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you
are not located in the United States, you will have to check the
laws of the country where you are located before using this
eBook.
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.F.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in
paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of
other ways including checks, online payments and credit card
donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.