Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook Holistic Engagement Transformative Social Work Education in The 21St Century 1St Edition Adam Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Holistic Engagement Transformative Social Work Education in The 21St Century 1St Edition Adam Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/big-bucks-the-explosion-of-the-
art-market-in-the-21st-century-adam/
https://textbookfull.com/product/thatcherism-in-the-21st-century-
the-social-and-cultural-legacy-antony-mullen/
https://textbookfull.com/product/handbook-of-the-sociology-of-
education-in-the-21st-century-barbara-schneider/
https://textbookfull.com/product/promising-practices-in-21st-
century-music-teacher-education-1st-edition-michele-kaschub/
Work Education Gandhiji s Nai Talim And Community
Engagement 1st Edition Veera Thakur
https://textbookfull.com/product/work-education-gandhiji-s-nai-
talim-and-community-engagement-1st-edition-veera-thakur/
https://textbookfull.com/product/teacher-education-in-the-21st-
century-singapore-s-evolution-and-innovation-1st-edition-oon-
seng-tan/
https://textbookfull.com/product/work-in-the-21st-century-an-
introduction-to-industrial-and-organizational-psychology-6th-
edition-jeffrey-m-conte/
https://textbookfull.com/product/quality-assurance-in-vietnamese-
higher-education-policy-and-practice-in-the-21st-century-cuong-
huu-nguyen/
https://textbookfull.com/product/using-language-fiction-and-
story-in-social-work-education-1st-edition-dara-sampson/
Holistic Engagement
Holistic Engagement
Transformative Social Work
Education in the 21st Century
Edited by Loretta Pyles
and
Gwendolyn J. Adam
1
1
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers
the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education
by publishing worldwide.Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University
Press in the UK and certain other countries.
9╇8╇7╇6╇5╇4╇3╇2╇1
Acknowledgments ix
About the Editors xiii
About the Contributors xv
( vii )
( viii ) Contents
Index 285
ACK NOWLEDGMEN T S
We are sincerely grateful to the authors of this volume who have shared their
pedagogical stories so candidly, revealing their inner worlds despite the chal-
lenges that such vulnerability can pose. They have been willing to revise repeat-
edly and go deeper when we have asked. We believe the fruits of their journeys
are revealed here and make this book unique in its richness and clarity.
We are appreciative of senior editor, Dana Bliss, Andrew Dominello, and
the editorial team at Oxford University Press, who have offered vital feedback
and support throughout this process. The external reviewers provided new and
thoughtful perspectives on our work that we have endeavored to adequately
incorporate throughout the chapters.
LORET TA PYLES
Although I have been blessed with many outstanding teachers throughout the
years, the pedagogy utilized in training yoga teachers at Kripalu School of Yoga
and Health has had a significant impact on this book. I am grateful to the many
teachers there who taught me how to hold space, let go, and integrate new insights
into mind–body–spirit. I hope I have been able to transmit some of the wisdom of
this dynamic tradition through these pages.
I am equally appreciative of my students, who have been willing to bravely
step into classroom experiences outside of the norm. They have trusted and taken
risks, with open minds and hearts. Their courage, insights, and growth are what
really inspired me to do this book.
I thank the following people who have offered wisdom, inspiration, and
encouragement (knowingly, and perhaps unknowingly) before and during the
writing of this book: Katharine Briar-Lawson, Ed Canda, Heather Horton,
Heather Larkin, Hal Lawson, Rachel Mehl, David Pettie, Salome Raheim, and
Ben Shepard. I am also appreciative of the resources and support from the Capital
District Contemplative Higher Education group and the SUNY Contemplative
Network. Thanks to all of my comrades at CommunityLAB, especially Shanna
Goldman and Angelica Clarke, who have helped me to refine some of these
( ix )
(x) Acknowledgments
practices and ideas and who are constantly teaching me about social justice work.
Last but not least, I have continually been moved and inspired by the authentic-
ity, persistence, and consistently positive encouragement offered by my co-editor
and co-author, Gwendolyn Adam. I have never had such a deeply fulfilling pro-
fessional collaborative writing experience.
I return home to thank Ted Mehl for his fierce loyalty, unwavering support,
appreciation, and love. And so as not to forget the nonhuman world, I am thank-
ful to Alex, Joey, and Tara and for the peace and inspiration bestowed by the
Helderberg and Catskill Mountains of upstate New York.
GWENDOLYN ADAM
together. I do not know anyone else who has made all of these happen without
knowing the other at all. If I had known how much her work, her process, and her
example could impact me, I would have signed up to be her student long ago. For
the rare gift of this project and our unexpected connection, I simply say thank
you, Loretta.
Second, my life story brought me to this work authentically, as a person and
professional who tends to spend more time in my head than in the rest of my expe-
rience. My journey to experience and teach the whole of living continues with
the support of people in my professional experiences and personal life, without
whom I would have had only ideas to share in this book rather than transforma-
tional experiences that let me know there is more to living and more to teaching
than just good ideas. They are my current life teachers who, from a much longer
list, have directly impacted my work on this text: my courageous CCSU social
work students and committed colleagues from the Committee on Well-being of
Children, Youth and Communities and the Social and Emotional Learning Task
Force at CCSU who, together, have welcomed my whole self as a teacher (with
all those mindfulness activities) and colleague; and Sharon Alpert, Maxwell
Adam, Elizabeth Weinberg, Susan Lord, Bodhi, and the unending beauty of the
Berkshires of western Massachusetts, which together cultivate my whole self as a
person. Because of you, I have so much more than ideas. Thank you.
ABOU T T HE EDI TOR S
Loretta Pyles, PhD, is Associate Professor in the School of Social Welfare at the
State University of New York (SUNY) at Albany. She is an engaged scholar con-
cerned with transformative social change and holistic social work practice and
pedagogy. Her scholarship has centered on the ways that individuals, organiza-
tions, and communities resist and respond to poverty, violence, and disasters in
a policy context of neoliberal global capitalism and social welfare retrenchment
in both the United States and the developing world. She is author of Progressive
Community Organizing: Reflective Practice in a Globalizing World (2nd ed.,
Routledge, 2014). She is a certified yoga instructor and utilizes mindfulness and
embodied learning in her pedagogy, both in the classroom and in the commu-
nity. For more information, see http://www.lorettapyles.com.
Gwendolyn “Wendy” J. Adam, PhD, MSW, LICSW, is Associate Professor
at Central Connecticut State University (CCSU), School of Education and
Professional Studies. Through a variety of leadership roles in academia, federal
government, and community practice, she developed experiential interdisciplin-
ary leadership training curricula for faculty, graduate trainees, and community-
based youth and family programs. She led a constituent-driven national needs
assessment for maternal and child health training programs and is currently
working with CCSU colleagues to co-create a social and emotional learning cur-
riculum for state pre-service teacher training. Her current research and writing
focus on cultivating engaged leadership, compassionate presence, and innovative
educational methods to engage the whole learner and the whole educator.
( xiii )
ABOU T T HE CON T R IBU TOR S
Meera Bhat, BA, MA, is a PhD student at the School of Social Welfare at SUNY
at Albany. Her dissertation research will focus on women’s experiences of partici-
pation and empowerment in emerging social entrepreneurship practices in India.
Her prior experience is in participatory research, collaborative training, and
community organizing on issues of youth as well as women’s health and micro-
finance. She is interested in participation as a means of empowering individuals
in personal, societal, and political spaces and building democratic institutions
that enable people to realize their capabilities. She has been involved in conduct-
ing classes, curriculum development, and research on holistic and experiential
learning for social work students and community organizers internationally.
Lara Bowen, BFA, MSW, attended the BFA in Acting program at SUNY
Purchase and received her MSW from SUNY Stony Brook with a specializa-
tion in Student–Community Development. She is currently pursuing her PhD
in Social Welfare at SUNY at Albany, with an emphasis on the study of applied
theater for social change.
Steve Burghardt, MSW, PhD, is Professor of Social Work at the Silberman
School of Social Work at Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY).
His most recent book is Macro Practice in Social Work for the 21st Century: Bridging
the Macro–Micro Divide (2nd ed., Sage, 2013).
Kate Cavanagh, LMSW, has worked at Fordham University’s Dorothy Day
Center for Service and Justice in the service learning program and for vari-
ous nonprofits in community programs. She is a mother who is part of a large
extended Italian and Irish American family, grew up in northwest New Jersey,
earned her BASW at Fordham University, and completed her MSW at Hunter
College, CUNY, concentrating in community organizing in 2006. While at
Hunter, she attended the Undoing Racism and Community Organizing training
for the first time and joined the facilitation team as a Paulo Freire Methodology
popular educator at the Brecht Forum.
Mette Christiansen, MSW, practiced as a social pedagogue in Denmark before
coming to the United States. After working several years as a direct care worker,
she obtained her MSW and now is Director of the Concentration in Human
( xv )
( xvi ) About the Contributors
field education, teaching approaches, career choice in social work, and the
impact of embodied practices such as yoga in social work. Publications include
“The Feeling of Being a Social Worker: Including Yoga as an Embodied
Practice” in Social Work Education (2011) and “She Let out a Burp and Got Rid
of It! Learning From a Social Worker’s Stories about Bodies in Mental Health
Conversations” in Francis, La Rosa, Shankaran, and Rajeev (Eds.), Social Work
Practice in Mental Health: Cross-Cultural Perspectives (Allied Publishers, 2015).
Terry Mizrahi, PhD, is Professor in the Silberman School of Social Work
at Hunter College. She chairs Community Organizing, Planning, and
Development. She co-chairs the national Special Commission to Advance
Macro Practice in Social Work. She is a founding member of the Association for
Community Organizing and Social Administration and is past president of the
National Association of Social Workers.
David Pettie, LCSW, ACSW, is Assistant Director of Field Education at
SUNY at Albany School of Social Welfare. He is currently exploring profes-
sional identity formation with beginning social workers and the role of mind-
fulness and contemplative practices within this process. In addition, he is
focusing on socialization toward masculinity, its impact on the capacity of
men to be relational, and the implications for a female-dominated helping
profession.
Alyson Quinn, BSW, MSW, is Instructor at University of British Columbia
School of Social Work and a group, individual, and couples therapist. She has
been practicing as a social worker for more than 25 years in South Africa,
London, and Vancouver as an individual, couples, and group therapist. She
is author of three books: Experiential Unity Theory and Model: Reclaiming the
Soul (Aronson, 2012); Reclaim Your Soul: Your Path to Healing (University
Press of America, 2014); and When the River Wakes Up (Rowman &
Littlefield, 2014).
Salome Raheim, PhD, ACSW, is Professor and former Dean at the University
of Connecticut School of Social Work. A meditation, yoga, and reiki practitioner,
she focuses her teaching and scholarship on culturally competent practice and
integrative mind–body–spirit approaches to health and healing.
Benjamin Shepard, PhD, LMSW, is Associate Professor of Human Services
at City Tech/CUNY. He is also the author/editor of many books, including
Community Projects as Social Activism (Sage, 2014) and Rebel Friendships: “Outsider”
Networks and Social Movements (Palgrave Macmillan, 2015).
Juliana Svistova, BSW, MSW, is a part-time lecturer and a PhD candidate at
the School of Social Welfare at SUNY at Albany. Her primary research focus is
on issues of participation in social development policy and practice, as well as
pedagogic settings.
( xviii ) About the Contributors
Beth Tinning, BSW, has been employed in the human services since 1991. She
has worked in organizations responding to domestic violence, sexual assault,
HIV/AIDS, and homelessness. From 2007 to 2014, she was a lecturer in the
Department of Social Work and Human Services, James Cook University. In
January 2015, she returned to direct service delivery and is currently Child &
Youth Counsellor at the Cairns Regional Domestic Violence Service.
Allison Weingarten, LMSW, is Program Director at Queens Community
House in Queens, New York. She runs an after-school program for elementary
school-aged children in Queens. She leads a staff team to promote social and aca-
demic development with the participants, staff members, and families through
programming focused on literacy, arts, science, math, music, team sports, dance,
group work, and community engagement.
Holistic Engagement
PART I
Theoretical and Empirical Foundations
of Holistic Engagement
(1)
CHAP T ER 1
Educating Transformative
Social Workers
The Case for Holistic Pedagogies
L OR ET TA P Y L E S A N D G W E N DOLY N J. A DA M
INTRODUCTION
(3)
(4) Theoretical and Empirical Foundations of Holistic Engagement
Because of the multileveled (micro, mezzo, and macro) and multilayered (bio-
logical, psychological, social, and spiritual) dimensions of 21st-century social
problems, social work educators require a unique set of knowledge, values, and
skills that approach these challenges holistically. Furthermore, given the sever-
ity of the challenges faced, such as hypercapitalism and privatization of public
services (Reisch, 2013), environmental devastation (Jones, 2010), and chronic,
debilitating stress (Koopsen & Young, 2009), social work educators must address
these challenges in manners that not only alleviate the negative effects of the
problems but also tap human strengths in ways that have the potential to trans-
form individuals, communities, and systems. This means that educators must
craft opportunities that help student social workers understand and reflect on
their own relationships to these issues and all of their complexity, in addition to
imagining and embodying new solutions in the classroom. It is clear that social
work practice and education in the 21st century demand new paradigms, innova-
tions, and risk-taking.
We believe these transformational processes can be nurtured in the class-
room through deliberate cultivation of deeper levels of questioning, awareness,
and human connection. This necessitates participation of the whole self in rela-
tion to other whole selves in the context of the environment we inhabit. Such
processes and practices require the creation of trusting, compassionate relation-
ships within the classroom community so that students feel safe enough to go
outside of their comfort zones. Such processes are phenomenological; there is a
felt, experiential sense of the body–mind and environment (Hocking, Haskell,
& Linds, 2001; Lynn, 2010). By engaging holistically in the classroom, student
social workers can take their new insights and skills into the community as they
practice transformative social work (Pyles, 2014).
Transformative social work is grounded at the unique crossroads of integra-
tive healing modalities and democratic social change movements, including
feminist organizing (Pyles, 2014). It seeks to bring awareness to and unravel the
knots of personal suffering and social oppression, reveal individual and collective
strengths, and empower people toward personal and social liberation. This kind
of social work practice requires the development of holistic engagement skills
and an integrative capability that allows practitioners to respond dynamically in
a globalizing environment.
This chapter strives to lay the foundation for what we call “pedagogies of holis-
tic engagement,” teaching methods that affirm the skills we argue are required
to transform social work education, practice, and the people with whom and
communities in which we work. These skills—presence with the whole self,
whole self-inquiry, empathic connection, and compassionate attention—have a
growing empirical base and provide the foundation for our overall conceptual
framework for holistic social work education. This framework will be explicitly
articulated in the next chapter. We begin this chapter by describing and analyz-
ing the current state of social work education, followed by an argument for why
E d u cat i n g T r a n s f o r m at i v e S o c i a l W o r k e r s (5)
body–mind–spirit social work approach, and can offer building blocks for holisti-
cally oriented, transformative education (Lee et al., 2009). What these approaches
have in common is that they reject reductionist and linear orientations to social
work practice—for example, an approach that defines a person as solely a psycho-
logical being who should perform a specific set of prescribed actions to achieve
stated psychological outcomes. Rather, they affirm the whole person, the role
of the environment, the fact of interconnectedness, and the complexity of the
human condition.
Yet, recent methods of social work practice, such as task-centered models
(Epstein & Brown, 2001), as well as long-standing medical models focused on
symptom amelioration, affirm a more rational–technical orientation to social
work that tends to isolate specific phenomena or variables at the expense of
complexity and holism (Barter, 2012). As well, the move toward evidence-
based social work practice, which has advanced social work’s ongoing efforts to
be viewed as a legitimate profession, has been appropriately critiqued (Adams,
Matto, & LeCroy, 2009). Evidence-based social work is predicated on specific
epistemological assumptions that embrace positivism, or the view that there
can be unbiased, certain knowledge. The positivist idea that knowledge is
incremental intersects with the modernist view that science and technology
will solve social problems (Coates, 2003). Furthermore, rational–technical
approaches to education arguably result in technical interventions, reflecting
a Eurocentric, masculine, and cognitive–behavioral bias (Barter, 2012; Kelly
& Horder, 2001).
Such a belief system has led to a “best practices” agenda that “encourages social
work students to demand certainty, reject an understanding and incorporation of
the role of context, resist learning concepts that challenge their assumptions, and
seek a ‘cookbook’ approach to social work practice” (Reisch, 2013, p. 721). We
argue that a new paradigm for social work education would affirm the ambiguity
of human lives and the social world; encourage inquiry into the origins and con-
texts of social problems; embrace creativity/spontaneity in social work practice;
and place self-awareness, reflection, and relationships at the core of social work.
educator and the ways these interact, we teach them to understand systems out-
side the classroom by ignoring the ones inside it.
Since the scientific revolution, the Academy has privileged cognitive learn-
ing in the “banking” style (Freire, 1970, 2000) as a primary method to facili-
tate student achievement. In this traditional educational system, which social
work has largely embraced, the teacher is a disembodied, all-knowing, cognitive
being depositing information into the disembodied minds of students who are
empty vessels. Such an approach perpetuates the social narratives that undergird
oppression, and it breeds a hegemonic, or power-over, dynamic between educa-
tors and students. This dynamic marginalizes students by failing to recognize
and develop their personal power while also oppressing educators by disallow-
ing them to bring their whole selves to their work (Barbezat & Bush, 2014; Kelly
& Horder, 2001). In short, it undermines student preparedness for macro-level
impact. A “banking” approach (Freire, 1970; Pyles, 2014) to cognitive learning,
however, arguably produces what postmodern theorist Michel Foucault (1975)
called “docile bodies,” which serve to maintain the status quo of the socioeco-
nomic order. These docile bodies are produced by controlling and disciplining
people through, for example, specific physical arrangements and ordering in the
classroom, such as students sitting in rows and a teacher standing at the front
of the room. The problem of such docile bodies becomes perhaps even more of
a challenge in this era of online and hybrid learning, as we are confronted with
more barriers to human connection (Henderson, 2010). While educators grapple
with blatant disconnection that this distance learner brings, there may be less
dissonance with classroom pedagogy if the same “banking” styles are utilized.
If both student and teacher are disembodied, with one delivering content to
another, we must consider how distance pedagogies and class-based ones actu-
ally differ.
Emerging from a critique of primary/secondary education and adult educa-
tion, there is a large body of literature advocating for transformative and holis-
tic approaches to education (Hart, 2014; Hocking et al., 2001; Mezirow, 1991).
Some social work educators have also been critiquing traditional approaches
for many years, arguing for transformative learning and anti-oppressive edu-
cation (Jones, 2010; Ross, 2007). These alternative approaches emphasize the
importance of rethinking fundamental assumptions and also the facilitation of
dialogic learning that can result in new paradigms and action. Although many
of the approaches to transformative education have done a good job of develop-
ing social justice-oriented classrooms, we find that many, although not all, tend
to emphasize the cognitive (and to some extent the emotional) dimension of
students and fail to acknowledge the body, heart, and spirit dimensions (Ross,
2007). Recent literature has begun to include more holistic and integrative ori-
entations to education, such as the approach put forward by education scholars
Ryoo, Crawford, Moreno, and Mclaren (2009), who propose an educational proc-
ess that “acknowledges the way students and teachers are exploited, fragmented,
(8) Theoretical and Empirical Foundations of Holistic Engagement
and Othered in schools while advocating for curricular and educational practices
that are based in love and integrity in an interdependent classroom community”
(p. 132).
Certainly necessary to social work education, cognitive learning often entails
learning new theories; studying empirical evidence; and engaging in the impor-
tant, although often elusive, practice of “critical thinking” (Gambrill & Gibbs,
2009; Kirst-Ashman, 2012). Cognition, however, especially when developed
in traditional ways, represents an incomplete attempt at developing the key ele-
ments of holistic engagement. Although cognition is crucial in information man-
agement, it cannot fully account for connections between people and between
people and systems. As a profession, social work purports that these relational
connections facilitate health, growth, development, and healing and are crucial
to mezzo and micro practice. For example, empathy requires connection with
some element of one’s experience emotionally and/or spiritually beyond the
messages of the mind—it is a felt process that the mind can recognize but not
genuinely create in the absence of body, heart, culture, and soul data input. By
fostering classroom spaces where students learn and practice methods of atten-
tion, self-reflection, and conscious communication, student-practitioners have
the opportunity to experience the effects that such techniques can have on their
own ability to engage holistically (Lynn, 2010; Ross, 2007). In so doing, students
learn the skills they need through pedagogical methods that reinforce and model
the skills needed to practice at multiple levels.
Several factors are converging at this particular time in history that necessitate
concerted efforts toward the development of holistic engagement skills in social
work practice and education. These factors are largely a function of neoliberal
globalization, which prioritizes privatization, profits, and the rights of corpora-
tions, and the consequences and impacts it is having on individuals, families,
organizations, communities, and larger social systems (Klein, 2002; Pyles, 2014).
They are (1) the invisible suffering of globalization, (2) the commodification and
compartmentalization of social work, (3) increased diversity and prevalence of
non-Western cultural practices, and (4) lifestyle-oriented health risks.
The first factor relates to the invisible suffering that lies behind the seemingly
triumphant neoliberal global economy and how it is affecting society in com-
plex and perhaps unknown ways. Many thinkers have noted how multinational
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
botanical work on the grasses; he was employed by Dr. Duncan in
arranging the plates of a botanical work belonging to the university
library; and, we have been told, that at one time he entertained
serious thoughts of becoming a lecturer on British botany. We know
that he was enthusiastically attached to this study, and oftener than
once we have accompanied him when he went on botanical
excursions. He not only attended the natural history class in the
university of Edinburgh, so ably taught by Professor Jameson, but he
became likewise a member of the Wernerian Natural History Society,
which, under the auspices of the same professor, has long held a
conspicuous place among the scientific associations of the country.
It is a singular circumstance in the feelings and character of Dr.
Oudney, that although the sedateness of his disposition and the
benevolence of his heart made him enjoy the quietness and the
comfort of home, and the interchange of the kind affections with his
relations and friends around the domestic hearth, with a peculiar
degree of satisfaction; although his steadiness and attention, joined
to his professional experience and skill, were fast procuring for him
an extensive medical practice; and although he could have formed a
matrimonial alliance both agreeable to his feelings and
advantageous to his prosperous establishment in life: yet, such was
his love of distinction as a scientific traveller, and so strong was his
desire of exploring distant, and of discovering unknown regions, that
he was willing, for a while, to forego every other consideration for the
sake of gratifying this master-passion of his mind. The hope of
having it in his power of visiting foreign countries, and of extending
the boundaries of physical knowledge, stimulated him to persevere
in those scientific pursuits which were especially fitted to qualify him
for accomplishing this purpose on which he had so steadfastly set
his heart; and caused him to make his sentiments on this subject
known to such individuals as he supposed had influence sufficient to
promote the object which he had in view. For this end, he would
have had no objections to have resumed his public services as a
naval surgeon, trusting that he might be sent to some station
favourable for prosecuting the inquiries which he was so anxious to
make. But the interior of Africa was the field of investigation on which
his own wishes were bent. The considerations, that the climate of
that country had been fatal to so many former travellers, and that its
inhabitants had showed themselves averse to have it traversed by
strangers, were unable to exert an influence over his mind
sufficiently strong to deter him from engaging in the enterprise if he
should have it in his power to make the attempt. He felt that his
constitution was vigorous; he had already acquired some knowledge
of tropical climates; and he trusted that he possessed prudence and
precaution sufficient to enable him to surmount every opposing
obstacle, and to conduct any expedition on which he might be sent
to a favourable and satisfactory issue. And sooner, we believe, than
he expected, he had an opportunity of putting his sanguine
anticipations to the test of experiment.
When it was known that government had resolved to send a new
expedition to explore the central parts of Africa, and especially to
trace the course, and endeavour to ascertain the termination of the
Niger, Dr. Oudney, through the influence of Professor Jameson,
along with Major Denham, and Captain Clapperton, was, greatly to
his own satisfaction, appointed on this interesting mission. He had
no fears of losing his health by travelling, was very sanguine that his
labours would be crowned with success, and, being amply provided
with instructions, by his friend Professor Jameson, how to prosecute
his inquiries, and to collect and preserve specimens of the natural
productions of the countries he was about to visit, he took farewell of
his friends in Scotland and went to London in the summer of the year
1821. And we are peculiarly happy, that by means of a regular series
of letters to his eldest sister, and to some other of his
correspondents, we are enabled not only to make him give a
luminous account of the rest of his career, but also to impart much
new and valuable information respecting the countries in which he
travelled. The first of the Doctor’s letters from which we shall take an
extract, is one which he sent to his friend Mr. James Kay, surgeon of
the Royal Navy, from London, on the eve of his setting out on his
expedition.
“Here I am actively engaged in business of one kind or another.
But I expect to finish and arrange every thing to day; for it is probable
Clapperton and I shall depart to-morrow morning, unless the mail be
detained a few days, a thing which I understand often happens. I
have found every thing very agreeable here. Those with whom I
have had to deal have been exceedingly polite, and in most respects
have forwarded my views as far as possible. Our worthy friend
Clapperton gets on amazingly well. I am in high spirits respecting my
mission; from all that I have been able to learn, very little danger, and
scarcely any impediments, are to be apprehended. We have got
excellent fowling-pieces and pistols, and a most valuable assortment
of philosophical instruments. The former, I hope, except for the
purposes of natural history, will scarcely be required—an agreement
exists between the British government and the pasha of Tripoli
respecting the conveying of travellers safe to Bornou, therefore, so
far as he is concerned, all is safe.”
The next letter in the series from which we shall quote is
addressed to his eldest sister, and is dated “Malta, October 17,
1821.”
“This is certainly a curious island, it was originally a barren rock,
but the labour of man has done wonders. Soil has been transported
from different places, on which many gardens have been formed.
The town is a strong fortress, celebrated in history for the noble
stand which it made against the whole power of the infidels. You can
have no idea of the houses from any thing you see in Edinburgh.
The roofs are all flat, and well fitted for a warm climate. The entrance
is capacious and gloomy, not unlike that of ancient baronial castles.
The rooms are lofty, the floors of which are paved with stone; and
the walls are generally decorated with large paintings. There is one
very fine church, St. John’s, the floors of which are all of the finest
marble, with some fine specimens of mosaic work, and the walls are
adorned with beautiful paintings and well executed sculpture. There
are, however, many marks of decay on the exterior of the building,
which, by the bye, does not present that grand appearance that one
would expect.”
The two letters which follow in the series are both dated “Tripoli,
October 24, 1821,” and relate principally to what occurred on the
passage from England to Africa.
“We are here at last, and a pretty place it is; so built, however, that
three can scarcely walk a-breast in the streets: every few yards a
house is in ruins, for there exists among the Moors a strange dislike
to repair any thing, particularly houses. Whether that arises from
indolence or superstitious notions, I cannot tell, but the fact is evident
to the most superficial observer. Our passage to Malta was
exceedingly agreeable—long certainly, but pleasant company
prevented tedium. I visited the galleries at Gibraltar, and was highly
pleased with the grandeur of the design. Your favourite fort, Malta,
excited very little interest in my mind, not that the place is deficient in
interest, but we were fretful from experiencing great harassment
from individuals who ought to have forwarded our views, so that a
disinclination to enjoy any thing was induced. On our arrival here, we
found matters far beyond our expectation; far to the south of Bornou
is open to us, and almost entirely subject to the pasha of Tripoli. All
our route is clear and free from danger. The pasha’s word is a law
not to be disobeyed, and he has pledged himself to protect us fifty-
seven days’ journey beyond Bornou. On our landing, that favourable
intelligence made us leap for joy. The Mahometans here are a most
liberal sort of men, and tolerate people of every religious persuasion
—a circumstance almost unknown in any other Mahometan country.
The police is admirable, so that a stranger may traverse every part of
the city without the least apprehension. As to the moral condition of
the people, I can say but little, as I have had very imperfect
opportunities of observing them.
“I must now describe to you my introduction to the pasha. The
court-yard was filled with people of very different complexions,
mostly the servants, guards, and relations of the pasha. The group
had a most motely appearance; many were superbly dressed, others
were in rags and filthy in the extreme. The room in which his
Highness was seated was decent, with nothing gaudy. He sat at the
farther end of the room, and his two sons sat on chairs at the other
end of it; while many of his guards and ministers stood in different
positions round the chamber. He was grave, and his muscles were
as motionless as those of a statue, so much so that I was several
times inclined to laugh. The gravity, however, ceased after a little
conversation, and then a scene was displayed far from being
disagreeable. He conversed with apparent pleasure on the success
of his arms, and on the great distance to which he could convey the
mission in perfect safety. That, you may be assured, was agreeable
intelligence to us, and inspired us with hopes of almost certain
success. I had to prescribe for him, for no sooner had I entered the
room than my advice was requested. The two sons present were
tolerably good-looking men; the elder of them was corpulent and
very like his father; and the younger of them tall, slender, and, upon
the whole, a good-looking young man. The pasha’s dress was clean,
plain and neat. I hope we shall be able to set off early in December
—a fine season for travelling—and expect to eat our new yearday’s
dinner in Mourzuk. We travel in European dresses, and in this
respect we shall be different from most of the former travellers in this
part of Africa. The pasha approves of our resolution, and the consul
is highly delighted with it. Indeed, on reflecting seriously on the
matter, I think the plan is by far the most judicious. Hypocrisy almost
always engenders suspicions; and the people well know that our
pretensions to be of their religion are only feigned.”
With regard to the last-mentioned statement of the above letter,
we know that Dr. Oudney was resolute in his determination not to
travel under an assumed name and character. He was too sincere
and conscientious a Christian ever to venture to lay aside the
avowed practice of its duties for the attainment of any purpose
whatsoever. He was strongly urged by some of his scientific friends
to endeavour to control his scruples on this subject, and, like his
predecessors in the same scheme of exploring Africa, to travel as an
Arab and a disciple of Mahomet, but without success; and he
declared that he would far rather abandon the enterprise to which he
had been appointed, than even in appearance to renounce his faith.
It so happened that the humour of the pasha of Tripoli, and the
circumstances of his dominions at the time they were traversed by
the mission to which Dr. Oudney was attached, favoured his design.
It is quite clear neither Dr. Oudney nor his companions could have
travelled in Africa as Mahometans, from their comparative ignorance
of the languages of the east, and of the rites of the religion of the
Arabian prophet. None of them had the preparatory training previous
to the commencement of their journey as was enjoyed by Burckhardt
and others; so that they must have been quickly detected as
impostors had they assumed the profession of Islamism; and it is
very true, as the Doctor remarks, that an exposed hypocrite is an
odious character in any country. It is quite obvious, however, that the
more familiar travellers are with the language of the people among
whom they travel, and the better acquainted they are with their
manners and customs, and their religious tenets and ceremonies,
they will thereby best secure their confidence, and be the better
enabled to adapt themselves to all circumstances, persons, and
seasons, which they may meet with, as well as greatly increase their
means of obtaining the knowledge of which they are in search. But
whether Dr. Oudney’s declared resolution to travel as an Englishman
and a Christian be approved of or not; or whether his conduct in this
respect may or may not be imitated by others, every one must
admire the honest sincerity of heart, and the unbending integrity of
principle which his resolution manifested. There is another letter to
his sister of the same date as the preceding, which likewise contains
some facts worthy of being published.
“Tripoli, October 24, 1821.
“It is with the sincerest joy I communicate to you my safe arrival
here. Every thing smiles and promises complete success to our
enterprise. Accounts arrived here a few days ago, that the pasha’s
army had penetrated to fifty-seven days’ journey beyond Bornou—a
circumstance exceedingly favourable to us, as no danger need be
apprehended the greater part of the way we design to take. This
town has a very indifferent appearance. I expected to see numerous
domes and gilded minarets, but such is not the case; a few ill-
shaped plain minarets are the only objects that relieve the eye. The
houses are clumsily built, with windows looking into a square court.
The roofs are all flat, and on them the Moors enjoy themselves in the
evenings, smoking their pipes. The streets are narrow, and, from the
deficiency of windows, have a very sombre effect. The inhabitants
consist of Moors, Jews, Christians, and Negroes; and although most
of them are poor and filthy, and live in miserable dwellings, yet they
may be regarded as happy; for there is here more toleration than in
any other Mahometan country.
“I have been presented to the pasha. He was sitting, with great
dignity, on his couch, in the manner of eastern princes, and with a
slight nod returned our salutations: he appeared to be about the
middle size—very corpulent—and apparently about forty years of
age. He was grave—a necessary part of the ceremony, I suppose—
for it vanished considerably when he began to converse. He
promised us every protection through all his dominions, which
extend far to the south, and said he should astonish Britain by the
distance he could conduct us all in safety into the interior of the
country. The castle he inhabits is far from being neat and clean, and
many of his attendants present a very shabby appearance. The
neighbouring country has nothing prepossessing; a few date and
other trees line the outskirts of the town; but for many miles beyond
this there is nothing but sand. In a few days we intend to make an
excursion with a party into the mountains, and to the remains of an
ancient Roman city. In my next, I shall give you some particulars of
the excursion.”
None of the letters in our possession contain any thing relative to
the mountains or the antiquities in the neighbourhood of Tripoli; but
we remember to have heard extracts of a letter from Dr. Oudney to
one of his friends in Edinburgh, dated Tripoli, 30th of October 1821,
in the Wernerian Natural History Society; and these extracts formed
the result of the excursion which he tells his sister he intended to
make to the mountains of Tripoli and to the ruins of a Roman city. His
next letter to his sister is dated Tripoli, December 10th, 1821, in
which he says—
“I am busy making preparations for my journey, which I expect to
commence about a fortnight hence. Every thing goes on well, and
the prospects of success are of the most promising kind. The climate
here is delightful, neither too hot nor too cold, but a just medium. A
considerable degree of cold, however, may be expected during the
time of part of our journey; but it is easier to remedy cold than heat.
My health is excellent, and I hope it will continue so.”
TO THE SAME.
TO THE SAME.
TO THE SAME.
“Mourzuk, May 12, 1822.
“Here I am, thank God, well and happy. The climate is hot, but I
have not experienced it very disagreeable. My health, indeed, has
been better since I left home than it was for a long time before.
Clapperton and I have been visiting a number of different places,
and intend spending our time in that way for the next two months,
when I hope we shall be able to proceed to Bornou. The soil is
sandy, and we have no other tree but that of the date. There is,
however, abundance of this sort, and its fruit forms the principal
sustenance of many thousands of the people. Without this tree, the
whole country, from this place to Bornou, would be a dreary waste.
You perhaps know that no rain falls here; on that account corn fields
and gardens are not to be expected. At the expense, however, of
much labour and care, as the ground requires to be continually
watered by streams from the wells, we have many of both. We have
always plenty of good water, at all times, a circumstance which, in a
country destitute of rain, you will be apt to think is rather singular and
curious, but it is one which you cannot be expected to understand
were I to enter into any explanation of it. All the places in Fezzan
exhibit a sameness of aspect. The towns are formed of mud houses,
generally of one flat; they have, for the most part, an old ruined
castle in the centre; and all of them are surrounded by walls. On the
outside of the towns, and in some places within the walls, a few
abodes are constructed of the leaves of the palm. The people are
really a fine race, and have uniformly treated us with the greatest
kindness. Wherever I go, and every day that I remain in this town, I
have numerous applications for medicines. Some of the applicants
have very curious complaints, which, were I to state them to you,
would make you laugh heartily. Many of them, however, are real, and
for which I can in general prescribe something for their relief. We are
much better here than we could have been in Tripoli. We meet every
day with persons from the country we are going to visit, and from
those through which we have to pass. We thus make friends that
may be of considerable service to us in our future investigations. We
are all living comfortably, in a tolerably good house in the castle; and
often in the mornings, about sunrise, take a ride round the town. It is
not safe to go out much in the sun; we, therefore, in this respect,
follow the example of the natives, and stop within during the heat of
the day.”
TO PROFESSOR JAMESON.
TO HIS SISTER.
TO THE SAME.
TO THE SAME.
TO THE SAME.