Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook Managerial Accounting 16Th Edition Ray Garrison Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Managerial Accounting 16Th Edition Ray Garrison Ebook All Chapter PDF
Ray Garrison
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://textbookfull.com/product/managerial-accounting-16th-edition-ray-garrison/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
https://textbookfull.com/product/managerial-accounting-ray-h-
garrison/
https://textbookfull.com/product/managerial-accounting-braun/
https://textbookfull.com/product/managerial-accounting-tayler/
https://textbookfull.com/product/managerial-accounting-6th-
edition-james-jiambalvo/
Horngren's Financial & Managerial Accounting, The
Managerial Chapters, Global Edition Tracie L. Miller-
Nobles
https://textbookfull.com/product/horngrens-financial-managerial-
accounting-the-managerial-chapters-global-edition-tracie-l-
miller-nobles/
https://textbookfull.com/product/financial-accounting-a-
managerial-perspective-6th-edition-narayanaswamy/
https://textbookfull.com/product/horngrens-financial-managerial-
accounting-6th-edition-ella-mae-matsumura/
https://textbookfull.com/product/intermediate-accounting-16th-
edition-donald-e-kieso/
https://textbookfull.com/product/horngrens-financial-managerial-
accounting-6th-edition-tracie-l-miller-nobles/
Managerial
Accounting
© Eli Pascall-Willis/Getty Images
Managerial
Accounting
Sixteenth Edition
Chief Product Officer, SVP Products & Markets: G. Scott Virkler Digital Product Analyst: Xin Lin
Vice President, General Manager, Products & Markets: Marty Lange Director, Content Design & Delivery: Linda Avenarius
Managing Director: Tim Vertovec Program Manager: Daryl Horrocks
Marketing Director: Natalie King Lead Content Project Manager: Pat Frederickson
Brand Manager: Pat Plumb Senior Content Project Manager: Angela Norris
Director, Product Development: Rose Koos Buyer: Sandy Ludovissy
Director of Digital Content: Peggy Hussey Design: Matt Diamond
Associate Director of Digital Content: Kevin Moran Content Licensing Specialists: Lori Slattery and Melissa Homer
Lead Product Developer: Kris Tibbetts Cover Image: © Eli Pascall-Willis/Getty Images
Product Developer: Erin Quinones Compositor: SPi Global
Marketing Manager: Cheryl Osgood Printer: LSC Communications
All credits appearing on page or at the end of the book are considered to be an extension of the copyright page. About the Author images: Courtesy of
author. Design element icons: banker’s lamp and a stack of books, © Janice Christine/Getty Images; education icons, © phipatbit/Shutterstock; office icons,
© Ingram Publishing; and justice icons, © Turnervisual/Getty Images.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Names: Garrison, Ray H., author. | Noreen, Eric W., author. | Brewer, Peter
C., author.
Title: Managerial accounting / Ray H. Garrison, D.B.A., CPA, Professor
Emeritus, Brigham Young University, Eric W. Noreen, Ph.D., CMA, Professor
Emeritus, University of Washington, Peter C. Brewer, Ph.D., Wake Forest
University.
Description: Sixteenth edition. | New York, NY : McGraw-Hill Education, [2018]
Identifiers: LCCN 2016040843 | ISBN 9781259307416 (alk. paper)
Subjects: LCSH: Managerial accounting.
Classification: LCC HF5657.4 .G37 2018 | DDC 658.15/11—dc23
LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2016040843
The Internet addresses listed in the text were accurate at the time of publication. The inclusion of a website does not indicate an endorsement by the authors
or McGraw-Hill Education, and McGraw-Hill Education does not guarantee the accuracy of the information presented at these sites.
mheducation.com/highered
About the
Authors
Ray H. Garrison is emeritus professor of accounting
at Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah. He received his BS and
MS degrees from Brigham Young University and his DBA degree
from Indiana University.
Professor Noreen has served as associate editor of The Accounting Review and the
Journal of Accounting and Economics. He has numerous articles in academic journals
including: the Journal of Accounting Research; The Accounting Review; the Journal
of Accounting and Economics; Accounting Horizons; Accounting, Organizations and
Society; Contemporary Accounting Research; the Journal of Management Accounting
Research; and the Review of Accounting Studies.
Professor Noreen has won a number of awards from students for his teaching.
Managerial Accounting S i xt e e n t h E di t i on v
Peter C. Brewer is a Lecturer in the Department
of Accountancy at Wake Forest University. Prior to joining the
faculty at Wake Forest, he was an accounting professor at Miami
University for 19 years. He holds a BS degree in accounting
from Penn State University, an MS degree in accounting from
the University of Virginia, and a PhD from the University of
Tennessee. He has published more than 40 articles in a variety
of journals including: Management Accounting Research; the
Journal of Information Systems; Cost Management; Strategic Finance; the Journal of
Accountancy; Issues in Accounting Education; and the Journal of Business Logistics.
Professor Brewer has served on the editorial boards of the Journal of Accounting
Education and Issues in Accounting Education. His article “Putting Strategy into the
Balanced Scorecard” won the 2003 International Federation of Accountants’ Articles of
Merit competition, and his articles “Using Six Sigma to Improve the Finance Function”
and “Lean Accounting: What’s It All About?” were awarded the Institute of Management
Accountants’ Lybrand Gold and Silver Medals in 2005 and 2006. He has received Miami
University’s Richard T. Farmer School of Business Teaching Excellence Award.
Prior to joining the faculty at Miami University, Professor Brewer was employed as an
auditor for Touche Ross in the firm’s Philadelphia office. He also worked as an internal
audit manager for the Board of Pensions of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.).
Garrison’s key pedagogical tools enhance and support students’ understanding of the
concepts rather than compete with the narrative for their attention. Process Costing 171
You should proceed to the requirements below only after completing your worksheet.
Required:
1. Check your worksheet by changing the beginning work in process inventory to 100 units, the
units started into production during the period to 2,500 units, and the units in ending work in
We have added 13 new exercises (located in the back of the book) that integrate learning objectives across
2.
not get these answers, find the errors in your worksheet and correct them.
How much is the total cost of the units transferred out? Did it change? Why or why not?
Enter the following data from a different company into your worksheet:
chapters. These exercises will increase the students’ level of interest in the course because they forge the
Beginning work in process inventory:
Units in process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200
Completion with respect to materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100%
connections across chapters. Rather than seeing each chapter as an isolated set of learning objectives,
Completion with respect to conversion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Costs in the beginning work in process inventory:
Materials cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
20%
$2,000
students begin to see how “it all fits together” to provide greater managerial insight and more effective
Conversion cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Units started into production during the period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Costs added during the period:
$800
1,800
planning, controlling, and decision making. The integration exercises also are tailor-made for flipping
Materials cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $18,400
Conversion cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $38,765
Ending work in process inventory:
Units in process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
the classroom because they offer challenging questions that require students to work in teams to derive
Completion with respect to materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Completion with respect to conversion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
100%
30%
solutions that synthesize what they have learning throughout the semester.
3.
What is the cost of the units transferred out?
What happens to the cost of the units transferred out in part (2) above if the percentage com-
pletion with respect to conversion for the beginning inventory is changed from 20% to 40%
and everything else remains the same? What happens to the cost per equivalent unit for con-
version? Explain.
The Foundational 15
Clopack Company manufactures one product that goes through one processing department called LO4–1, LO4–2, LO4–3,
Mixing. All raw materials are introduced at the start of work in the Mixing Department. The com-
pany uses the weighted-average method of process costing. Its Work in Process T-account for the
Mixing Department for June follows (all forthcoming questions pertain to June):
LO4–4, LO4–5
The Foundational 15
June 1 balance
Work in Process—Mixing Department
The June 1 work in process inventory consisted of 5,000 units with $16,000 in materials cost and
$12,000 in conversion cost. The June 1 work in process inventory was 100% complete with respect
to materials and 50% complete with respect to conversion. During June, 37,500 units were started
be used for in-class discussion or as homework
into production. The June 30 work in process inventory consisted of 8,000 units that were 100%
complete with respect to materials and 40% complete with respect to conversion.
Required:
assignments. They are found before the Exercises
1.
2.
Prepare the journal entries to record the raw materials used in production and the direct labor
cost incurred.
Prepare the journal entry to record the overhead cost applied to production.
and are available in Connect.
3. How many units were completed and transferred to finished goods during the period?
Managerial Accounting S i xt e e n t h E di t i on ix
Rev.Confirming Pages
LO4–1
I like how you engage the reader
Record the flow of materials, labor,
and overhead through a process
costing system.
Kathy Crusto-Way,
© Kristoffer Tripplaar/Alamy
LO4–4 Assign costs to units using the
weighted-average method.
If you have ever spilled milk, there is a good chance that you used Bounty
paper towels to clean up the mess. Procter & Gamble (P&G) manufactures LO4–5 Prepare a cost reconciliation report Tarrant County College
Bounty in two main processing departments—Paper Making and Paper Con- using the weighted-average method.
verting. In the Paper Making Department, wood pulp is converted into paper LO4–6
An excellent text that is
(Appendix 4A) Compute the
and then spooled into 2,000 pound rolls. In the Paper Converting Depart- equivalent units of production using
ment, two of the 2,000 pound rolls of paper are simultaneously unwound the FIFO method.
154
A similar entry would be made to apply manufacturing overhead cost in the Bottling
Department.
Completing the Cost Flows Once processing has been completed in a department,
the units are transferred to the next department for further processing, as illustrated
in the T-accounts in Exhibit 4–3. The following journal entry transfers the cost of the
units that have been completed within the Formulating Department to the Bottling
Department:
After processing has been finished in the Bottling Department, the costs of the com-
pleted units are transferred to the Finished Goods inventory account:
Finally, when a customer’s order is filled and units are sold, the cost of the units is
transferred to Cost of Goods Sold:
To summarize, the cost flows between accounts are basically the same in a process
costing system as they are in a job-order costing system. The only difference at this
point is that in a process costing system each department has a separate Work in Process
account.
These helpful boxed features offer a glimpse Candy manufacturers are feeling pressure from customers to remove unhealthy ingredients
Confirming Pages
from their snack food. For example, Nestlé has been working on removing artificial colors (such
as Red 40 and Yellow 5) and artificial flavors (such as Vanillin) from its more than 250 chocolate
into how real companies use the managerial products. The company plans to use Annatto (which comes from achiote trees) instead of arti-
ficial food colors and it intends to replace vanillin with natural vanilla flavor. While these natural
current examples. This margin of safety means that at the current level of sales and with the company’s cur-
rent prices and cost structure, a reduction in sales of $12,500, or 12.5%, would result in
just breaking even. Process Costing Computations: Three Key Concepts
In a single-product company like Acoustic Concepts, the margin of safety also can be
In process costing, each department needs to calculate two numbers for financial report-
expressed in terms of the number of units sold by dividing the margin of safety ingin dollars
purposes—the cost of its ending work in process inventory and the cost of its com-
by the selling price per unit. In this case, the margin of safety is 50 speakerspleted
($12,500
units ÷
that were transferred to the next stage of the production process. The key to
$250 per speaker = 50 speakers). deriving these two numbers is calculating unit costs within each department. On the sur-
face, these departmental unit cost calculations may seem very straightforward—simply
MANAGERIAL divide the department’s costs (the numerator) by its outputs, or units produced (the
ACCOUNTING IN ACTION Prem Narayan and Bob Luchinni met to discuss the results of Bob’s analysis.denominator). However, to set the stage for correctly performing this seemingly simple
Prem: Bob, everything you have shown me is pretty clear. I can see whatcomputation,
impact theyou will need to understand three key foundational concepts.
THE WRAP-UP
sales manager’s suggestions would have on our profits. Some of those suggestions
are quite good and others are not so good. I am concerned that our margin of safety is
only 50 speakers. What can we do to increase this number?
Bob: Well, we have to increase total sales or decrease the break-even point or both.
Prem: And to decrease the break-even point, we have to either decrease our fixed
expenses or increase our unit contribution margin? gar07417_ch04_154-195.indd 159 08/18/16 08:36 PM
Bob: Exactly.
Prem: And to increase our unit contribution margin, we must either increase our selling
price or decrease the variable cost per unit?
Bob: Correct.
Prem: So what do you suggest?
Bob: Well, the analysis doesn’t tell us which of these to do, but it does indicate we have
a potential problem here.
Prem: If you don’t have any immediate suggestions, I would like to call a general meeting
next week to discuss ways we can work on increasing the margin of safety. I think every-
one will be concerned about how vulnerable we are to even small downturns in sales.
Managerial Accounting S i xt e e n t h E di t i on xi
Confirming Pages
170 Chapter 4
4–6 Assume that a company has two processing departments—Mixing followed by Firing.
Explain what costs might be added to the Firing Department’s Work in Process account
during a period.
4–7 What is meant by the term equivalent units of production when the weighted-average
method is used?
4–8 Watkins Trophies, Inc., produces thousands of medallions made of bronze, silver, and
gold. The medallions are identical except for the materials used in their manufacture.
What costing system would you advise the company to use?
Applying Excel
LO4–2, LO4–3, LO4–4, LO4–5 Confirming
This exercise relates to the Double Diamond Skis’ Shaping and Milling Pages
Department that was dis-
cussed earlier in the chapter. The Excel worksheet form that appears below consolidates data from
Exhibits 4–5 and 4–8. Download the workbook containing this form from Connect, where you will
also receive instructions about how to use this worksheet form.
End-of-Chapter Material
172 Chapter 4
Method40%
Materials
65%
Conversion
30% end-of-chapter material and text content but also un
derscored Garrison’s fundamental belief in the importance
LO4–2, LO4–3, LO4–4, LO4–5
Old Country Links,The department
Inc., started 175,000
produces sausages units intodepartments—Mixing,
in three production production during the month
Casing andand transferred
190,000 completed
Curing, and Packaging. units Department,
In the Mixing to the next department.
meats are prepared and ground and then mixed
gar07417_ch04_154-195.indd 170 08/18/16 08:36 PM
with spices. Required:
The spiced meat mixture is then transferred to the Casing and Curing Department,
where the mixture is force-fed
Compute into casings
the equivalent units and then hung and
of production cured in climate-controlled smoking
for October.
chambers. In the Packaging Department, the cured sausages are sorted, packed, and labeled. The
company uses the weighted-average method in its process costing
EXERCISE 4–3 Cost per Equivalent Unit—Weighted-Average
the Casing and CuringMicro
Superior Department follow:
Products
system. Data
Confirming Method for
Pages LO4–3September for
uses the weighted-average method in its process costing system. Data for
the Assembly Department for May appear below:
of applying theory through practice. It is not enough for
180 Chapter 4 Work in process inventory, September
Cost added during1May. . . . .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . . 1. . . . . 100%
Percent Completed
Materials
$238,900
Labor
Units Mixing Materials Conversion
Work in process, May 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $18,000 $5,500
90% $80,300
Overhead
$27,500
80% $401,500
students to read, they must also understand. To this day, the
guiding principle of that first edition remains, and Garrison’s
Work in process inventory, September
Equivalent units of30 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. . . . . 100%
production 35,000 80% 33,000 70% 33,000
Required:
Cases Compute the cost per equivalent unit for materials,
Mixing labor,Materials
overhead, andConversion
in total.
units)conversion
100% complete; were completed and transferred
60% complete . . . . . . .to
. . the
. . . .Packaging
. . . . . . . . . .Department.
..... $ 8,208*
Costs transferred in during the month from the
Required:
preceding department, 1,950 units . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,940
1. Determine the Casing and Curing Department’s equivalent units of production for mixing,
Materials cost added during the month . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,210
materials, and conversion for the month of September. Do not round off your computations.
Conversion costs incurred during the month . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,920
2. Compute the Casing and Curing Department’s cost per equivalent unit for mixing, materials,
Total departmental costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $46,278
and conversion for the month of September.
3. Compute
Finishing Department the Casing
costs assigned to: and Curing Department’s cost of ending work in process inventory for
Units completed andmixing, materials,
transferred conversion,
to finished goods,and in total for September.
1,800 units 4. Compute
at $25.71 the .Casing
per unit . . . . . . .and
. . . .Curing
. . . . . . .Department’s
. . . . . . . . . . . . .cost
. . . . of
. . .units
. transferred
$46,278 out to the Packaging
Department
Work in process inventory, Aprilfor
30,mixing,
600 units; materials,
. . . . . . .conversion,
. . . . . . . . . . .and
. . . .in
. . total
. . . for September.
materials 0%5.complete;
Prepareconversion
a cost reconciliation
35% complete report . . .for
. . .the
. . . Casing
. . . . . . . and
. . . .Curing
.. Department
0 for September.
Total departmental costs assigned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $46,278
* Consists of cost transferred in, $4,068; materials cost, $1,980; and conversion cost, $2,160.
“He’s struggling to learn our system,” replied Frank Harrop, the operations manager. “The
problem is that he’s been away from process costing for a long time, and it’s coming back slowly.”
“It’s not just the format of his report that I’m concerned about. Look at that $25.71 unit cost
Strong integration
gar07417_ch04_154-195.indd 176 08/18/16 08:36 PM
that he’s come up with for April. Doesn’t that seem high to you?” said Ms. Scarpino.
“Yes, it does seem high; but on the other hand, I know we had an increase in materials prices
during April, and that may be the explanation,” replied Mr. Harrop. “I’ll get someone else to redo
this report and then we can see what’s going on.”
and end-of-chapter
1. Prepare a report for the Finishing Department showing how much cost should have been
assigned to the units completed and transferred to finished goods, and how much cost should
have been assigned to ending work in process inventory in the Finishing Department.
2. Explain to the president why the unit cost on the new assistant controller’s report is so high.
exercises/problems. CASE 4–20 Ethics and the Manager, Understanding the Impact of Percentage Completion on
Profit—Weighted-Average Method LO4–2, LO4–3, LO4–4
Gary Stevens and Mary James are production managers in the Consumer Electronics Division of
General Electronics Company, which has several dozen plants scattered in locations throughout
Clearly written and well- the world. Mary manages the plant located in Des Moines, Iowa, while Gary manages the plant in
El Segundo, California. Production managers are paid a salary and get an additional bonus equal
to 5% of their base salary if the entire division meets or exceeds its target profits for the year. The
bonus is determined in March after the company’s annual report has been prepared and issued to
organized content.
stockholders.
Shortly after the beginning of the new year, Mary received a phone call from Gary that went
like this:
Gary: How’s it going, Mary?
Mary: Fine, Gary. How’s it going with you?
Gary: Great! I just got the preliminary profit figures for the division for last year and we are within
Carleton Donchess, $200,000 of making the year’s target profits. All we have to do is pull a few strings, and we’ll be
over the top!
Mary: What do you mean?
Gary: Well, one thing that would be easy to change is your estimate of the percentage completion of
AACSB Statement
McGraw-Hill Education is a proud corporate member of AACSB International.
Recognizing the importance and value of AACSB accreditation, we have
sought to recognize the curricula guidelines detailed in AACSB standards
for business accreditation by connecting selected questions in Managerial
Accounting, 16e, to the general knowledge and skill guidelines found in the
AACSB standards. The statements contained in Managerial Accounting, 16e,
are provided only as a guide for the users of this text. The AACSB leaves
content coverage and assessment clearly within the realm and control of
individual schools, the mission of the school, and the faculty. The AACSB does
also charge schools with the obligation of doing assessment against their own
content and learning goals. While Managerial Accounting, 16e, and its teaching
package make no claim of any specific AACSB qualification or evaluation, we
have, within Managerial Accounting, 16e, tagged questions according to the
six general knowledge and skills areas. The labels or tags within Managerial
Accounting, 16e, are as indicated. There are, of course, many more within
the test bank, the text, and the teaching package which might be used as a
“standard” for your course. However, the labeled questions are suggested for
your consideration.
Managerial Accounting S i xt e e n t h E di t i on xv
Chapter 4 Chapter 10
We revised the text in the main body of the chapter and We overhauled Appendix 10B to introduce students
Appendix 4A to better highlight the key concepts to a Microsoft Excel-based approach for creating an
and steps needed to perform the weighted-average income statement using standard costing.
and FIFO process costing calculations. We also revised
the first few paragraphs of Appendix 4B to better clarify Chapter 11
its purpose and to better distinguish that purpose from This chapter includes four new In Business boxes.
the intent of the service department cost allocation
Chapter 12
coverage that appears later in the book.
We revised the front-end of the chapter to better
Chapter 5 highlight the six key concepts that provide the
We added a new appendix that explains how to foundation for effective decision making. We also
analyze mixed costs using the high-low method and revised the end-of-chapter exercises and problems
the least-squares regression method. to better dovetail with Connect and streamlined the
coverage of sell or process further decisions to aid
Chapter 6 student comprehension. In addition, we relocated
We added new text that better highlights this chapter’s the Pricing appendix to this chapter and added new
reliance on actual costing and contrasts it with the job- coverage of customer latitude and pricing and value-
order costing chapters’ reliance on normal costing. based pricing.
Chapter 13
Chapter 7
We revised many end-of-chapter exercises and
This chapter has a new appendix titled Time-Driven
problems and extensively revised the formatting
Activity-Based Costing: A Microsoft Excel-Based
within Connect throughout all the chapters, (not just
Approach.
Chapter 13) to allow students greater flexibility for
alternate methods of approaching a problem, such as
Chapter 8
performing net present value calculations.
The end-of-chapter materials include three new
exercises/problems (8-17, 8-18, and 8-27). Chapter 14
We added three new In Business boxes.
Chapter 9
We revised numerous end-of-chapter exercises and Chapter 15
problems to better align them with Connect. We added four new In Business boxes.
McGraw-Hill Connect®
Learn Without Limits
Connect is a teaching and learning platform
that is proven to deliver better results for
students and instructors.
Connect empowers students by continually
adapting to deliver precisely what they
need, when they need it, and how they need
it, so your class time is more engaging and
effective.
Analytics
Connect Insight®
Connect Insight is Connect’s new one-of-a-
kind visual analytics dashboard—now available
for both instructors and students—that
provides at-a-glance information regarding
student performance, which is immediately actionable.
By presenting assignment, assessment, and topical
performance results together with a time metric that
is easily visible for aggregate or individual results, Connect
Insight gives the user the ability to take a just-in-time approach Students can view
to teaching and learning, which was never before available. their results for any
Connect Insight presents data that empowers students and
helps instructors improve class performance in a way that is Connect course.
efficient and effective.
Mobile
Connect’s new, intuitive mobile interface gives students
and instructors flexible and convenient, anytime–anywhere
access to all components of the Connect platform.
Adaptive
THE ADAPTIVE
READING EXPERIENCE
DESIGNED TO TRANSFORM
THE WAY STUDENTS READ
SmartBook®
Proven to help students improve grades and
study more efficiently, SmartBook contains the
same content within the print book, but actively
tailors that content to the needs of the individual.
SmartBook’s adaptive technology provides precise,
personalized instruction on what the student
should do next, guiding the student to master
and remember key concepts, targeting gaps in
knowledge and offering customized feedback,
and driving the student toward comprehension
and retention of the subject matter. Available on
tablets, SmartBook puts learning at the student’s
fingertips—anywhere, anytime.
www.mheducation.com
Acknowledgments
Suggestions from professors, students, and the professional accounting community continue
to drive the excellence and refinement of each edition of this book. Each of those who have
offered comments and suggestions has our immense gratitude and thanks.
The efforts of many people are needed to continually refine a text and maintain its excellence.
Among these people are the reviewers and consultants who point out areas of concern,
cite areas of strength, and make recommendations for change. In this regard, the following
academics have provided feedback that was enormously helpful in preparing the sixteenth
edition of Managerial Accounting:
Dawn Addington, Central New Mexico Community College Wanda Causseaux, Valdosta State University
Nasrollah Ahadiat, California State PolytecnicUniversity David Centers, Grand Valley State University
Markus Ahrens, St. Louis Community College–Meramec Sandra Cereola, James Madison University
Akinloye Akindayomi, University Of Gayle Chaky, Dutchess Community College
Massachusetts–Dartmouth Pamela Champeau, University of Wisconsin Whitewater
David Albrecht, Bowling Green State University Kathryn Chang, Sonoma State University
Natalie Allen, Texas A & M University Valerie Chau, Palomar College
Vern Allen, Central Florida Community College Clement Chen, University of Michigan–Flint
Shamir Ally, DeSales University Carolyn Christesen, Westchester Community College
Felix Amenkhienan, Radford University Star Ciccio, Johnson & Wales University
Jane Austin, Oklahoma City University Richard S. Claire, Canada College
John Babich, Kankakee Community College Robert Clarke, Brigham Young University–Idaho
Ibolya Balog, Cedar Crest College Curtis Clements, Abilene Christian University
Bonnie Banks, Alabama A&M University Darlene Coarts, University of Northern Iowa
Scottie Barty, Northern Kentucky University Ron Collins, Miami University–Ohio
Eric Bashaw, University of Nevada–Las Vegas Carol Coman, California Lutheran University
Lamrot Bekele, Dallas County Community College Jackie Conrecode, Florida Gulf Coast University
Sharon Bell, University of North Carolina–Pembroke Debora Constable, Georgia Perimeter College
Amy Bentley, Tallahassee Community College Pamela Rita Cook, University of Delaware
Benner, Stark State College Wendy Coons, University of Maine
Stephen Benner, Eastern Illinois University Susan Corder, Johnson County Community College
Scott Berube, University of New Hampshire Michael Cornick, Winthrop University
Kelly Blacker, Mercy College Deb Cosgrove, University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Phillip Blanchard, The University of Arizona Kathy Crusto-Way, Tarrant County College
Charles Blumer, Saint Charles Community College Robin D’Agati, Palm Beach State College–Lake Worth
Rachel Brassine, East Carolina University Masako Darrough, Baruch College
Alison Jill Brock, Imperial Valley College Patricia Davis, Keystone College
Ann Brooks, University of New Mexico Kathleen Davisson, University of Denver
Rada Brooks, University of California–Berkeley Nina Doherty, Arkansas Tech University
Myra Bruegger, Southeastern Community College Patricia Doherty, Boston University
Georgia Buckles, Manchester Community College Carleton Donchess, Bridgewater State University
Esther Bunn, Stephen S. Austin State University Peter Dorff, Kent State University
Laurie Burney, Mississippi State University David Doyon, Southern New Hampshire University
Marci Butterfield, University of Utah–Salt Lake City Emily Drogt, Grand Valley State University
Charles Caliendo, University of Minnesota Rita Dufour, Northeast Wisconsin Technical College
Donald Campbell, Brigham Young University–Idaho Barbara Durham, University of Central Florida
Don Campodonico, Notre Dame de Namur University Dean Edmiston, Emporia State University
Dana Carpenter, Madison Area Technical College Barb Eide, University of Wisconsin–Lacrosse
Special thanks also to the team of contributors who spend countless hours helping us build and test our digital assets
and ancillary materials. This team includes the best and brightest in the business. Julie Hankins (as Lead Digital
Contributor), deserves special mention for her tireless efforts in building, testing, and supporting others in producing
the Connect assessment content. We also thank the following contributors: Patti Lopez (Valencia College), for her
continued lead in building our adaptive products; Kay Poston (Francis Marion University), Beth Woods (subject matter
and digital consultant), and Mark McCarthy (East Carolina University), for their detailed Connect accuracy reviews;
Ilene Persoff (Long Island University); Ann Brooks (University of New Mexico), for her authoring contributions to the
redesigned Concept Overview Videos and adaptive product testing; Jeannie Folk (member of the Illinois Board of
Examiners), for her work on both the updates to the Lecture Notes and redesigned Concept Overview Videos; Jon A.
Booker (Tennessee Technological University), Cynthia J. Rooney (University of New Mexico), and Susan C. Galbreath
(Lipscomb University), for crafting PowerPoint presentations; Margaret Shackell-Dowell (Cornell University), for her
continued authoring excellence of the Guided Examples; and Helen Roybark (Radford University), for her detailed text
and instructor manual reviews.
We are grateful to the Institute of Certified Management Accountants for permission to use questions and/or unofficial
answers from past Certificate in Management Accounting (CMA) examinations.
Index 773
xxiii
Contents
Prologue Chapter
1
Managerial Accounting: An Overview 1 Managerial Accounting and
Cost Concepts 24
What Is Managerial Accounting? 2
Planning 3 Cost Classifications for Assigning
Controlling 4 Costs to Cost Objects 25
Decision Making 4 Direct Cost 26
Indirect Cost 26
Why Does Managerial Accounting
Matter to Your Career? 5 Cost Classifications for Manufacturing Companies 26
Business Majors 5 Manufacturing Costs 26
Accounting Majors 7 Direct Materials 27
Professional Certification—A Smart Investment 7 Direct Labor 27
Manufacturing Overhead 27
Managerial Accounting: Beyond the Numbers 9 Nonmanufacturing Costs 28
An Ethics Perspective 9
Code of Conduct for Management Accountants 9 Cost Classifications for Preparing Financial
Statements 28
A Strategic Management Perspective 10
Product Costs 29
An Enterprise Risk Management Perspective 12
Period Costs 29
A Corporate Social Responsibility Perspective 15
A Process Management Perspective 16 Cost Classifications for Predicting Cost Behavior 30
A Leadership Perspective 17 Variable Cost 30
Intrinsic Motivation 17 Fixed Cost 32
Extrinsic Incentives 17 The Linearity Assumption and the Relevant Range 33
Cognitive Bias 18 Mixed Costs 34
Summary 18 Cost Terminology—A Closer Look 36
Glossary 18
Cost Classifications for Decision Making 37
Questions 19
Differential Cost and Revenue 37
Exercises 20
Sunk Cost and Opportunity Cost 38
xxiv
Contents xxv
2
Appendix 2B: Exercises, Problem, and Case 106
Chapter
Chapter
Process Costing
4 154
Chapter
5
Cost-Volume-Profit Relationships 196
Comparison of Job-Order and Process Costing 155 The Basics of Cost-Volume-Profit (CVP) Analysis 198
Similarities between Job-Order and Contribution Margin 198
Process Costing 155
CVP Relationships in Equation Form 200
Differences between Job-Order and Process
Costing 155 CVP Relationships in Graphic Form 201
Preparing the CVP Graph 201
Cost Flows in Process Costing 156 Contribution Margin Ratio (CM Ratio) and the Variable
Processing Departments 156 Expense Ratio 203
The Flow of Materials, Labor, and Overhead Costs 157 Applications of the Contribution Margin Ratio 205
Materials, Labor, and Overhead Cost Entries 158 Additional Applications of CVP Concepts 206
Materials Costs 158 Example 1: Change in Fixed Cost and
Labor Costs 158 Sales Volume 206
Overhead Costs 158 Alternative Solution 1 207
Completing the Cost Flows 159 Alternative Solution 2 207
Example 2: Change in Variable Costs and
Process Costing Computations: Three Key Sales Volume 207
Concepts 159 Solution 207
Key Concept #1 160 Example 3: Change in Fixed Cost, Selling Price, and
Key Concept #2 160 Sales Volume 207
Key Concept #3 160 Solution 208
Contents xxvii
Example 4: Change in Variable Cost, Fixed Cost, and Selling and Administrative Expenses 259
Sales Volume 208 Summary of Differences 259
Solution 208
Example 5: Change in Selling Price 209 Variable and Absorption Costing—An Example 260
Solution 209 Variable Costing Contribution Format Income
Statement 260
Break-Even and Target Profit Analysis 210 Absorption Costing Income Statement 262
Break-Even Analysis 210
The Equation Method 210 Reconciliation of Variable Costing with Absorption
The Formula Method 210 Costing Income 264
Break-Even in Dollar Sales 211 Advantages of Variable Costing and the Contribution
Target Profit Analysis 211 Approach 266
The Equation Method 212 Enabling CVP Analysis 266
The Formula Method 212 Explaining Changes in Net Operating Income 267
Target Profit Analysis in Terms of Dollar Sales 212 Supporting Decision Making 267
The Margin of Safety 213
Segmented Income Statements and the Contribution
CVP Considerations in Choosing a Cost Structure 214 Approach 268
Cost Structure and Profit Stability 214 Traceable and Common Fixed Costs and the Segment
Operating Leverage 215 Margin 268
Structuring Sales Commissions 218 Identifying Traceable Fixed Costs 269
Traceable Fixed Costs Can Become Common Fixed
Sales Mix 218 Costs 269
The Definition of Sales Mix 218
Sales Mix and Break-Even Analysis 219 Segmented Income Statements—An Example 270
Levels of Segmented Income Statements 271
Summary 221
Review Problem: CVP Relationships 221 Segmented Income Statements—Decision Making and
Glossary 224 Break-Even Analysis 273
Questions 224 Decision Making 273
Applying Excel 224 Break-Even Analysis 274
The Foundational 15 226
Segmented Income Statements—Common
Exercises 227 Mistakes 275
Problems 232
Omission of Costs 275
Cases 239
Inappropriate Methods for Assigning Traceable Costs
Appendix 5A: Analyzing Mixed Costs 241 among Segments 276
Glossary (Appendix 5A) 249 Failure to Trace Costs Directly 276
Appendix 5A: Exercises and Problems 249 Inappropriate Allocation Base 276
Arbitrarily Dividing Common Costs among
Segments 276
Chapter
6 Income Statements—An External Reporting
Perspective 277
Companywide Income Statements 277
Segmented Financial Information 278
Variable Costing and Segment
Reporting: Tools for Management 257 Summary 278
Review Problem 1: Contrasting Variable and Absorption
Overview of Variable and Absorption Costing 258 Costing 279
Variable Costing 258 Review Problem 2: Segmented Income Statements 281
Absorption Costing 258 Glossary 282
xxviii Contents
8
Appendix 6A: Exercises and Problems 307
7
Chapter
Chapter
Master Budgeting 362
Jefim oli tuskin ehtinyt näin päätellä, kun tuo mies alkoi rukoilla.
Hän kumartui kolme kertaa: kerran eteenpäin Jumalalle ja sitten
oikealle ja vasemmalle oikeauskoiselle kristikunnalle. Ja kun hän
käänsi päänsä oikealle, näki Jefim todellakin ystävänsä Jelisei
Bodrovin. Hän tunsi tämän mustan kiharan parran, josta pilkisti
harmaata poskien kohdalla, silmäkulmat, silmät, nenän ja koko
kasvot — Jelisei Bodrov ilmielävänä.
Jefim tuli hyvin iloiseksi, kun oli jälleen tavannut
matkakumppaninsa, ja ihmetteli samalla, miten tämä oli päässyt
perille ennen häntä.
Jefim vaelsi samaa tietä kuin mennessäänkin. Kun hän läheni kotia,
valtasi hänet huoli omaisista: kuinkahan nämä ovat tulleet toimeen
hänen poissaollessaan? — Vuodessa ehtii paljon tapahtua, —
ajattelee hän itsekseen. Koko elämä menee ihmiseltä
kuntoonpanemiseen, mutta hävittämiseen tarvitaan hyvin vähän
aikaa. Kuinkahan poika lienee hoitanut taloa? Millainen mahtoi olla
kevät, miten on karjan laita ollut talvella, kuinka uusi rakennus on
onnistunut? Jefim tuli samoille tienoille, missä oli edellisenä vuonna
joutunut eroon Jeliseistä. Asukkaita ei voinut enää tuntea samoiksi.
Kuka edellisenä vuonna oli nähnyt nälkää, eli nyt herroiksi. Vilja oli
kasvanut hyvin, ihmiset olivat taas päässeet hyvään alkuun ja
näyttivät unohtaneen entisen surkeuden. Iltapuolella päivää Jefim
joutui samaan kylään, missä oli Jeliseistä eronnut. Hän oli tuskin
ennättänyt kylään, kun pieni valkeaan paitaan puettu tyttönen juoksi
ulos mökistä huutaen hänelle:
— Poikkea meille, ukko. Saat meillä illallista ja voit olla meillä yötä.
— Ei, isoäiti, hän laski repun ensin maahan keskelle tupaa ja nosti
sitten penkille.
Jefim oli ollut poissa tasan vuoden. Kun hän palasi kotiin, oli taas
kevät.
— Olisit itse hoitanut asiat, virkkoi poika. — Mutta sinä läksit maita
kiertämään ja otit mukaasi kaikki rahat. Minunko niistä on tehtävä
tiliä!
KOIRANI
I
BULJKA.
BULJKA JA METSÄKARJU.