2019 Seal of Good Local Governance

2019
SEAL OF GOOD LOCAL

GOVERNANCE
SGLG FORMS
Form 2.1 - 2.7 PCM LGOO
Form 2A - 2M LG Dep Heads (CM) - Certifications
Form 2A - 2K LG Dep Heads (P) - Certifications
Form 2E (Photo Documentation)
Form 3.1 - 3.7 RAT (CM) - Data Capture Form
Form 3.1 - 3.7 RAT (P) - Data Capture Form
Tab B Criteria matrix
Tab A Technical Notes

FINANCIAL
ADMINISTRATION
FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION (upgrade in red font) P HUC ICC/CC M-1st-3rd c M 4th -6th c
1.1 Good Financial Housekeeping
1.1.1. Most recent COA Opinion is un/qualified + 30% of
recommendations fully complied/acted upon
1.1.2. Compliance with the Full Disclosure Policy (CY 2018 all
quarters, CY 2019 1st quarter), a. Three CP b. FDPP c. e-SRE
1.2 Financial Performance
1.2.1. At least 5% increase in average local revenue growth for 3
consecutive years CYs 2015 to 2017 source: DOF-BLGF
1.3 Financing Development

1.3.1 Functional local devt council (LDC): (a)composition, (b)meeting
(c) all plans:CDP/PDPFP,LDIPand AIP (d) satisfactory participation of CSOs
1.3.2 Fund Utilization of NGA-supported capital investment proj.

a. Full utilization of the 20% component of the 2017 IRA
Consideration: Posting benchmark Prov-59%; Cities-55% & Mun-66%
(Physical consideration no longer applies)
b. Full Utilization rate of Performance Challenge Fund

(Fund released in 2016-2017) Physical consideration no longer applies)
c. Full utilization of Assistance to Municipalities program

(Funds released in 2015-2016, at least 85% for CY 2017 funds)
1.3.3. CY 2019 budget is approved within the prescribed period

1. FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION
Good Financial Housekeeping
1. Audit Opinion Qualified/Unqualified + 30% of recommendations fully complied with
Form 3.1 For RAT
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT:
PCM
1. Most recent COA Audit Opinion is
unqualified or qualified; AND
2. 30% of recommendations acted
upon
SOURCE DOCUMENT:
1. LGU’s Annual Audit Report by
the Commission on Audit (CYs
2017 and 2018)
2. List of official audit opinions
from COA website
PCM PCM
QUALIFIED/UNQUALIFIED OPINION 30% OF RECOMMENDATIONS ACTED UPON

To COMPUTE
See section: Status of Implementation Prior Years’

Unimplemented Audit Recommendations in the
AAR
contains: total audit recommendations; and no. of

See : Executive Summary
recommendations fully/ partially/ not implemented
Form 3.1 For RAT
ACCOMPLISH CHANGE
REQUEST FORM
For data provided by partner agencies

–items marked with (N)- indicate
whether there is a discrepancy as
compared to LGU data.
In case of discrepancy accomplish
Change Request Form. Pending data
reconciliation, RAT may carry the
answer that favors the LGU.
2.1 For the C/MLGOO

AGREEMENTS/ISSUES
Take Note : compute only the FULLY COMPLIED recommendations
No more PARTIALLY COMPLIED which was considered in the 2018 SGLG

2. Compliance with the Full Disclosure Policy of Local Budget and Finances, Bids and Public Offerings
(a. Three conspicuous places b. FDPP c. BLGF portal)
Form 3.1 For RAT
PCM
Full compliance with FDP
(CY 2018 all quarters and CY
2019 1st quarter),
1. Three conspicuous places
2. 2. FDP Portal -AND- 2017
LGU e-SRE in BLGF portal
Form 3.1 For RAT

SOURCE DOCUMENT:
1) 3 Conspicuous places: Actual
posting within LGU premises, and
photos that show actual presence
of posted documents for the FDP
(Certified Form 2E Photo
documentation)
2) Actual posting in FDPP, and list of
fully-compliant LGUs on FDPP from
BLGS-PCMD
3) List of compliant LGU on the
submission of e-SRE for 2017 from
BLGF
2.1 For the C/MLGOO
Note: Since the FDPP was down starting from the last quarter of 2018, only the FDPP posting
from the 1st quarter of 2018 to 3rd quarter 2018 will be checked. Data will come from the BLGS
list of compliant LGUs.
Form 2 E
PHOTO
DOCUMENTATION
UPLOAD PHOTO
PLACE CAPTION
3. Average local revenue growth from CYs 2015 to 2017
Form 3.1 For RAT
PCM
At least 5% increase in average
local revenue growth for three
(3) consecutive years (2015-
2017)
SOURCE DOCUMENT:
• Certified Form 2K
• Data from SREs prepared by
Local Treasurer for CYs 2015 to
2017
• Data on average local revenue
growth from CYs 2015 to 2017
from DOF-BLGF
Computation:
Locally-sourced revenue = RPT (basic) + Tax on Business + Other taxes + Regulatory fees +
Service/user charge + Receipts from economic enterprise

2.1 For the C/MLGOO
FORM 2K
Financing Development
4a.Functional local development council (LDC): structures and socio-economic plans and policies
Form 3.1 For the RAT

PCM
Must comply with all tests
of functionality :
composition;
meetings (both semesters in
CY 2018); executive
committee;
approved PDPFP/CDP, LDIP
and AIP; Secretariat
Form 3.1 For the RAT
SOURCE DOCUMENT:
• Exec Order or Resolution creating the LDC
(with names of member-CSOs and official
representatives)
• LDC Minutes of the Meetings for CY 2018
• Executive Order creating LDC executive
committee
• Socio-economic plans and policies:
-Sanggunian resolution approving CDP
-List of provinces with approved PDPFP
from NEDA
-Sanggunian resolution approving LDIP
- Sanggunian resolution approving AIP
If currently under review, consideration for PDPFP as
indicated in Disaster Preparedness area will be
applied
2.1 For the C/MLGOO
4b. Functional LDC: Satisfactory participation of its CSO members
Form 3.1 For RAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENT:

PCM
CSO participation as demonstrated
in:
1. Attendance to meetings held at
least once in a semester for CY
2018; AND
2. Inputs from the CSO or actual
participation of CSO
representative as captured in
the Minutes of Meeting or any
LGU official document,
OR at least 1 CSO’s Plan of Action
submitted in CY 2018
Form 3.1 For RAT SOURCE DOCUMENT:

• Executive Order or Resolution
creating the LDC (with names of
member-CSOs and official
representatives)
• List of organized and accredited CSOs
• LDC Minutes of the Meetings
• CSO Plan of Action, if any
• Documentation of workshops on
project prioritization conducted in CY
2018, if any
• Post-activity report, if any
• Project monitoring report, if any
2.1 For the C/MLGOO

5. Utilization rate of the 20% component of the annual Internal Revenue Allotment or
Development Fund CY 2017
Form 3.1 For RAT
PCM
1. Should have appropriated no less than
20% component of IRA CY 2017 for
development projects; AND
2. By laws and related policies, 100 %
utilization of the 20% DF.
Consideration is given to an LGU that met

the median for:
Provinces = 59%,
City = 55%, and
Fund utilized refers to fund disbursed. Municipality = 66%
Computation: (Total Utilized Fund / 20% of IRA for CY 2017) x 100%
SOURCE DOCUMENT:
• Certified Form 2K
Form 3.1 For RAT
• Data from SREs prepared by Local
Treasurer for CY 2017
• Data on utilization of 20% IRA
component/Development Fund CY
2017 from DOF-BLGF
Notes:
a. In case of inconsistency between
LGU data and BLGF, RAT must fill
out Change Request Form for
further verification.
b. Cut-off date as of Dec. 31, 2018

2.1 For the C/MLGOO

AGREEMENTS/ISSUES
Regardless of justification utilization will be treated as utilization

6. Utilization rate of Performance Challenge Fund, if applicable
Form 3.1 For RAT

PCM
For beneficiary-provinces, cities and
municipalities that received PCF in 2016
and/or 2017: 100% fund utilization
DILG MC Nos. 2016-167 and 2017-160 state
that project(s) funded by PCF must be
implemented within a period of one year.
Fund utilized refers to fund disbursed.
Computation: (Total Utilized Fund / Total Fund

Allocation) x 100%
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENT:
LGUs that received PCF in earlier years
should also have 100% fund utilization (Refer to
Annex A- List of LGUs that do not have 100% fund
utilization reported to BLGD as of March 26, 2019)
Form 3.1 For RAT

SOURCE DOCUMENT:
• Certified Form 2A
• Data on PCF status of funds prepared
by Local Accountant for funds
received in CYs 2016 and 2017
• Data on utilization of PCF 2016 and
2017 from DILG-RO-PDMU
Notes:
a. In case of data inconsistency, RAT
must reconcile data, if necessary,
with the DILG Region’s PDMU
b. Cut-off date is one-year since release
of Notice to Implement
2.1 For the C/MLGOO

Form 2A
AGREEMENTS/ISSUES
• Notice to Implement – reckoning period

• If the LGU wants to implement the balance, it is in the policy that implementation
must still be completed within 1 year from NTI.
• Balance returned to the Bureau of Treasury after completion of project considered
100% utilization
7. Utilization rate of funding assistance from Assistance to Municipalities program (formerly Bottom-Up
Budgeting), if applicable
Form 3.1 For RAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENT:

MUNICIPALITIES ONLY
100% utilization of DILG-managed

funds received in CYs 2015 and 2016,
and
at least 85% utilization of DILG-
managed funds received in CY 2017
Fund utilized refers to fund disbursed.

Computation:
(Total Utilized Fund / Total Fund
Allocation) x 100%
Form 3.1 For RAT SOURCE DOCUMENT:
• Data on BuB-AM status of funds
prepared by Local Accountant for
funds received in CYs 2015 to 2017
• Data on utilization of BuB-AM funds
CYs 2015 to 2017 from DILG-RO-
PDMU
Notes:
a. In case of data inconsistency, RAT
must reconcile data, if necessary,
with the Region’s PDMU
b. Cut-off date as of Dec 31, 2018
2.1 For the C/MLGOO

Form 2A
8. Approved CY 2018 annual budget
Form 3.1 For RAT
PCM
CY 2019 budget should have
been approved by December 31,
2018
Consideration is given to an
LGU with CY 2019 budget
approved beyond December 31,
2018, but not later than March
31, 2019 (Sec. 323).
SOURCE DOCUMENT:
Ordinance enacting CY 2019 budget
Sangguniang Bayan/Panlungsod
8. Approved CY 2018 annual budget
2.1 For the C/MLGOO

DISASTER
PREPAREDNESS
2.DISASTER PREPAREDNESS (italics are new or upgraded indicators) P HUC ICC/CC M-1st-3rd c M 4th -6th c
2.1 2018 1st Place National Gawad KALASAG (KAlamidad at
sakuna LAbanan SAriling Galing ang KalaLigtasan) Awardee for     
LDRRMCs, or Hall of Fame Awardee (2015 onwards), OR
ALL of the following:
2.1.1. Established Structure and manpower complement
a. Convened LDRRMC (mtg once every quarter & 4 CSOs & 1 PS)     
b. Plantilla LDRRM Officer SG-22 SG-22 SG-22 SG-18 SG-15
c. Plantilla LDRRMO staff complement responsible for research &
At least 1
planning, administration & training and operations & warning 3 3 1 1
designated
Consideration: designated staff complement
2.1.2 Plans available & funds utilized:
a. Approved PDPFP or CLUP
Consideration: In case Plan is still under review, risk assessment should have been already     
incorporated.
b. LDRRM Plan and Budget     
c. Adopted local climate change action plan     
d. Contingency plan for top 2 high risk hazard     
e. At least 50% fund utilization of the 70% component of CY 2018
LDRRMF (Current Fund; cut-off date: Dec. 31, 2018)     
f. At least 75% of brgys have CBDRRM Plans    
DISASTER PREPAREDNESS P HUC ICC/CC M-1st-3rd c M 4th -6th c
2.1.3. Early warning system (EWS)     
2.1.4. Evacuation management

a. All minimum required facilities present in evacuation
center
b. System for registration     
c. Prepositioned goods and resources i.e., volunteer groups, relief,
medical services, psycho- social support, and security services
d. At least 75% of brgys with info guide (CMs only)
2.1.5 Systems and structures Items a

a. Standard operating procedures and b, plus
ALL 4
b. Equipped and trained SAR/ER teams in top 2 high risk
ALL 4 ALL 4 *OpCen ALL 4 ANY 2 of
hazard *OpCen *OpCen *OpCen items c to
c. LDRRM Operations Center functions
functions functions functions at e *OpCen
d. At least 1 LDRRMC member (LGU-based)/ plantilla at least least during functions
LDRRMO trained in ICS 24/7 24/7 during a
disaster a disaster at least
e. SOP for pre-emptive and forced evacuation during a
disaster
2. DISASTER PREPAREDNESS
1. 2018 1st Place National Gawad KALASAG (KAlamidad at sakuna LAbanan
SAriling Galing ang KalaLigtasan) Awardee for Best Local Disaster Risk Reduction
and Management Councils (LDRRMCs), or Hall of Fame Awardee for Best
Form 3.2 For RAT LDRRMCs, OR
PCM
2018 1st Place National Gawad
KALASAG Awardee for Best Local
DRRM Council, or Hall of Fame
Awardee for Best LDRRMCs category
(2015 onwards)
Upon official release, awardees of the

aforementioned category for CY 2019
will also be considered.
1. 2018 1st Place National Gawad KALASAG (KAlamidad at sakuna
LAbanan SAriling Galing ang KalaLigtasan) Awardee for Best
Local Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Councils
(LDRRMCs), or Hall of Fame Awardee for Best LDRRMCs, OR
Form 3.2 For RAT
SOURCE DOCUMENT:
• List of 2018 1st Place National

Gawad KALASAG awardees for
Best LDRRMCs from DND-OCD
• List of 2015-2018 Gawad
KALASAG Hall of Fame awardees
for Best LDRRMCs from DND-OCD
• Certified Form 2E (Photo
Documentation)
2.2 For the C/MLGOO

Form 2 E
PHOTO
DOCUMENTATION UPLOAD PHOTO
PLACE CAPTION
2. Convened LDRRMC
Form 3.2 For RAT
PCM
LDRRMCs must:
1. Be composed of at least 4 CSO and
1 private sector members, AND
2. Had convened at least once for
every quarter of CY 2018
SOURCE DOCUMENT:
• Executive Order or similar
issuance creating the LDRRMC
• LDRRMC Minutes of the Meeting
in CY 2018 (quarterly)
2. Convened LDRRMC
2.2 For the C/MLGOO

3a. Functionality of LDRRMO: Plantilla LDRRM Officer (Head of
Office)
Form 3.2 For RAT
Prov and cities : plantilla LDRRMO IV (SG 22) at least
1st to 3rd class mun: plantilla LDRRMO III (SG 18) at

least
4th to 6th class mun: plantilla LDRRMO II (SG 15) at
least
Consideration is given to an LGU with an

appointed LDRRMO (Head of Office) with
temporary status; provided that said
temporary appointment:
1. Has not exceeded one (1) year period;
2. Has the prescribed salary grade; and
3. Is CSC-attested.
Office)
Form 3.2 For RAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: cont. of the consideration
Appointment that is yet to be attested by CSC is

considered as long as it bears the required SG and
LGU has already transmitted its copy to CSC Field
Office.
Consideration is also given to an LGU with a

recently vacated plantilla LDRRMO position
because incumbent was separated from service
e.g., resignation/retirement; provided that:
1. Vacancy happened within June 2018 to May
2019
2. Vacated position has the prescribed SG
3. Efforts to hire new LDRRMO is already ongoing
Office)
Form 3.2 For RAT/Sub RAT
SOURCE DOCUMENT:
• Appointment of LDRRM Officer –Head of Office
with CSC attestation
• CSC Resolution granting the LGU authority to
take final action on its appointment, in case
LGU is accredited
• Letter for CSC Field Office transmitting copy,
and requesting attestation, of appointment, in
case LGU is not accredited

Office)
2.2 For the C/MLGOO

3b. Functionality of LDRRMO: Plantilla LDRRMO staff
Form 3.2 For RAT/Sub RAT Provinces and HUCs: At least three (3) plantilla
LDRRMO staff
ICCs/CCs and 1st – 3rd Class Municipalities: At least

one (1) plantilla LDRRMO staff
4th – 6th Class municipalities: At least one

designated LDRRMO staff
Consideration is given to a
province, city and 1st – 3rd Class municipality whose
LDRRMO staff is(are) employed as contractuals/ job
orders, or is (are) designated.
3b. Functionality of LDRRMO: Plantilla LDRRMO staff
Form 3.2 For RAT
SOURCE DOCUMENT:
• Appointment of LDRRMO staff with
CSC attestation
• Executive order or similar issuance
for designation of LDRRMO staff

Office)
2.2 For the C/MLGOO

Availability of plans and documents that integrate DRR and CCA-related
measures: 4. PDPFP or CDP
Form 3.2 For RAT
Province only:
Approved PDPFP
Consideration is given to a
province whose PDPFP is still
under review; provided that
results of risk assessment
should have already been
incorporated in the final draft
of PDPFP, as certified by RLUC
or NEDA-RO
Availability of plans and documents that integrate DRR and CCA-related
measures: 4. PDPFP or CDP
Form 3.2 For RAT
SOURCE DOCUMENT
PDPFP
• List of Provinces with approved
PDPFP from NEDA
• List of Provinces with PDPFP under
review from NEDA
• Approved PDPFP
• RLUC resolution approving PDPFP
• If PDPFP is yet to be approved:
Certification from RLUC or Regional
NEDA stating that the final draft is
currently under review and results
of risk assessment is already
incorporated therein
2.2 For PD/Provl Staff

Availability of plans and documents that integrate DRR and CCA-
related measures: 4. PDPFP or CLUP
Form 3.2 For RAT

Cities and municipalities: Approved
CLUP with zoning ordinance
Consideration is given to a city or

municipality whose CLUP is still
under review; provided that results
of risk assessment should have
already been incorporated in the
final draft of CLUP, as certified by
PLUC/Regional HLURB.
Form 3.2 For RAT
SOURCE DOCUMENT
CLUP:
• List of Cities and Municipalities with
approved CLUP from HLURB
• Approved CLUP
• Zoning ordinance implementing the Plan
• If CLUP is yet to be approved: Certification
from PLUC or Regional HLURB stating that
the final draft is currently under review
and results of risk assessment is already
incorporated therein
In case of inconsistency between LGU and

HLURB/NEDA data, RAT must fill-out Change
Request Form for further verification

2.2 For the C/MLGOO

related measures: 5. LDRRM Plan and Budget
Form 3.2 For RAT Provinces, cities and municipalities:
Approved LDRRM Plan with funded DRR
activities in the 2019 AIP, as verified by the
DRR-CCA Focal Person of DILG-RO
Note: The LDRRM Plan must cover CY 2019

and must be incorporated in the Annual
Investment Program (AIP).
SOURCE DOCUMENT
• Approved LDRRM Plan
• Sanggunian Resolution adopting
LDRRM Plan
• Approved 2019 AIP
related measures: 5. LDRRM Plan and Budget
2.2 For the C/MLGOO

Form 2 C
Availability of plans and documents that
integrate DRR and CCA-related
measures: 5. LDRRM Plan and Budget
related measures: 6. LCCAP
Form 3.2 For RAT
Provinces, cities and municipalities: *
• Approved LCCAP (if stand alone) OR
• Approved PDPFP/CLUP/CDP (if mainstreamed),
as verified by the DRR-CCA Focal Person of the
concerned DILG-RO,
must contain:
1. Results of risk assessment; and
2. Climate change adaptation and mitigation
actions.
SOURCE DOCUMENT
• Adopted LCCAP; AND
• Sanggunian resolution adopting LCCAP
• Approved PDPFP, CLUP, or CDP if LCCAP is integrated
in any of the 3 plans
related measures: 6. LCCAP
2.2 For the C/MLGOO

related measures: 7. Contingency plan
Form 3.2 For RAT
Provinces, cities and municipalities:
Approved Contingency Plan for top 2
high risk hazard of the LGU (as indicated
in LGU Hazard Profile section), verified
by the DRR-CCA Focal Person of the
concerned DILG-RO.
Each Plan must contain (in no particular

order):
1. Anatomy of the Hazard
2. Scenario Generation
3. Affected Population
4. Coordination, Command & Control Protocols
5. Activation, Deactivation & Non-Activation
Protocols

Hazard Profile [page 5 of DCF)
Form 3.2 For RAT
SOURCE DOCUMENT
• Contingency Plan approved by
LDRRMC for top 1 high risk hazard
• Contingency Plan approved by
LDRRMC for top 2 high risk hazard
• Sanggunian resolution adopting
each Contingency Plan
Note: Plan must be approved within

the last three years (June 2016 to
May 2019).
2.2 For the C/MLGOO


AGREEMENTS/ISSUES
8. Utilization rate of LDRRMF’s 70% allocation for disaster
prevention and mitigation, preparedness, response, rehabilitation
and recovery, CY 2018 (Current Fund)
Form 3.2 For RAT
1. Should have appropriated no less

than 5% of the estimated revenue
from regular sources in 2017 as
LDRRMF for 2018; AND
2. At least 50% utilization of the 70%

component (Preparedness Fund) of
LDRRMF for 2018 Current Fund
Form 3.2 For RAT and recovery, CY 2018 (Current Fund)
SOURCE DOCUMENT
• Report on LDRRMF utilization signed by the
Local Accountant and LDRRMO
• Report of LDRRMF utilization posted in the
FDP Portal
Notes:
a. Signed report on LDRRMF utilization must
be consistent with the LDRRMF utilization
report posted in the FDP Portal.

2.2 For the C/MLGOO
Form 2 A
9. CBDRRM Plan and Budget
Form 3.2 For RAT Cities and municipalities:
At least 75% of barangays have approved
CBDRRM Plans, as verified by the DRR-CCA
Focal Person of the concerned DILG-RO/PO
* Consideration is given to one-pager

matrix indicating DRR- related PPAs, with
clear targets, timeframes, budget, and
approved by the Barangay Development
Council.
SOURCE DOCUMENT
• Certified Form 2F
• Approved CBDRRM Plan
• BDC resolution approving CBDRRM Plan
2.2 For the C/MLGOO

Form 2F
Form 2 C
10. Early warning system (EWS)
Form 3.2 For RAT
All EWS indicators present:
1. One marker per hazard area, and present in
high risk areas
2. Audible and wide-ranging warning and alarm
system (e.g siren, church bell, radio)
3. Automated rain gauge OR locally-innovated
technology to measure amount of rainfall
4. Info on EWS in conspicuous places (e.g. public
market, LG building) .
SOURCE DOCUMENT
• Certified Form 2E (Photo documentation)
• Posted information on EWS
• Actual EWS
Form 2.2 For the C/MLGOO

Form 2 E – PHOTO DOCUMENTATION
Form 2 E – PHOTO DOCUMENTATION
11a. Evacuation management – Evacuation center
Form 3.2 For RAT
Identified evacuation center –

permanent, semi-permanent or
temporary, that has:
1. Met minimum required facilities

2. System
for registration of evacuees
3. Localized
information guide with facilities or
map
Form 3.2 For RAT
SOURCE DOCUMENT
• List of evacuation centers (permanent and/or
temporary)
• MOA (covering CYs 2018 and 2019) with partner-schools
or child development centers indicating arrangements on
using them as temporary evacuation centers, including but
not limited to: (i) gymnasiums, learning & activity centers,
and auditoriums be utilized first; (ii) classrooms be only used
when no other facility or space inside the school is available
for use as temporary evacuation center; and (iii) designation
of non- school and childhood development personnel as
camp managers in compliance with Sec 2(b) of the IRR of RA
10821.
• Actual evacuation center and its facilities
• Accomplished registration document for evacuees OR
system of registration stated in the Standard
Operating Procedures or similar document
• Copy of evacuation center information guide
Evacuation center refers to a safe site, building or center hosting internally displaced
persons, which includes covered courts, barangay/community halls, camping areas,
collective centers, multi-purpose centers, established “tent cities”, or schools.
Permanent evacuation centers are those built or constructed for the specific purpose of
evacuation during disasters.
Semi-permanent centers may refer to buildings that are LGU-owned but are at times used
for purpose other than evacuation pre-disaster e.g., multi-purpose halls.
Temporary evacuation centers are schools or child-development centers which the LGU
sought partnership with, to use as temporary shelters during actual evacuation. MOA is
required in this type of arrangement (Sec 2(a) of the IRR of RA 10821).
Form 2E
AGREEMENTS/ISSUES
11b. Evacuation management -- Evacuation information guides
Form 3.2 For RAT

Cities and municipalities:
At least 75% of barangays with

evacuation guides
SOURCE DOCUMENT
• Certified Form 2F
• Sample evacuation guide

Form 2F
11c. Evacuation management -- Prepositioned goods and
resources
Form 3.2 For RAT
All of the following mechanisms for:

1. Mobilization and management of volunteer
groups
2. Goods for relief operations, either:
(a) stockpiling that must include at least
500 food packs and 500 hygiene kits, or
(b) in partnership with suppliers
3. Medical services, provided by
either
in-house professionals or in
partnership with other entities
4. Psycho-social support, provided by
either in-house professionals or in
partnership with other entities
5. Security services.
resources
Form 3.2 For RAT/Sub RAT SOURCE DOCUMENT
• Inventory of stockpiled food packs and hygiene kits
• List of LGU-hired medical professionals
• List of LGU-hired professionals trained for psycho-
social support services and their training
certificates
• Memorandum of Agreement or other documents
(covering CYs 2017 and 2018) indicating
arrangements with:
- volunteer groups
- supermarkets
- pharmacies
- medical groups
- psycho-social professionals
- security system
• Security services indicated in the Standard
Operating Procedures or in the Security Plan of the
PNP
resources

resources
Form 2E
12. Standards Operating Procedure
Form 3.2 For RAT/Sub RAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENT:

Provinces, cities and
municipalities
must have SOP
SOURCE DOCUMENT
• Standard Operating Procedures
(whether a separate document
or integrated in LDRRM Plan or
Contingency Plan
12. Standards Operating Procedure

12a. SOP -- LDRRM Operations Center
Form 3.2 For RAT
Provinces and HUCs:
Permanent LDRRM OpCen (functioning 24/7)
Component cities and 1st to 3rd Class mun:

LDRRM OpCen (temporary, at least functioning
24/7 during disasters)
4th to 6th Class municipalities: LDRRM OpCen

(temporary, at least functioning 24/7 during
disasters)
[Note: This forms part of the ANY TWO of the
three rule —12(a), 12(c.2) and 12(d)]
SOURCE DOCUMENT
• EO or similar issuance on the establishment of LDRRM
OpCen in case it is temporary or functions 24/7
• OpCen Employee logbook

Form 2E
12b. Evacuation management -- Equipped
and trained SAR or ER teams
Form 3.2 For RAT
must have the following:
1. Teams organized not earlier than CY
2016
2. With equipage (motorized vehicle,
generator set, water rescue kit,
extrication kit, personal protective
gear, first aid kit and emergency
medical kit)
3. Trained in top 2 high risk hazard of the
LGU (as indicated in LGU Hazard Profile
section) search and rescue and basic
life support not earlier than CY 2016
Form 3.2 For RAT
SOURCE DOCUMENT
• List of organized teams and
personnel complement from
2015 to 2018
• Inventory of equipment
• Accomplishment report
(with photos)of trainings
provided to SAR or ER teams
from 2016 to 2019

Form 2E
12c. Incident Command System (ICS)
Form 3.2 For RAT
Provinces, cities and 1st to 3rd Class
municipalities:
1. Established ICS; AND
2. LDRRMC head/member (LGU-based), or
LDRRMO head/staff that is trained In
any level of ICS
4th to 6th Class municipalities:

1. Established ICS; AND
2. LDRRMC head/member (LGU-based), or
LDRRMO head/staff that is trained in
any level of ICS
[Note: This forms part of the ANY TWO of the three

rule —12(a), 12(c.2) and 12(d)]
SOURCE DOCUMENT
Form 3.2 For RAT • EO or similar issuance establishing an
Incident Command System
• ICS Training Certificate issued by DND-
OCD
• LGU ID of staff with ICS Training
• LDRRMO Appointment of staff with ICS
Training, or copy of designation of said
staff to LDRRM Office
The 4 ladderized training courses of the Incident

Command System (ICS) :
Level I - Basic ICS,
Level II- Integrated Planning,
Level III- Position Courses, and
Level IV- All-Hazard Incident Management
Team

12d. Pre-emptive and forced evacuation
Form 3.2 For RAT Provinces, cities and 1st to 3rd Class
mun: Established pre-emptive and
forced evacuation
For 4th – 6th Class Municipalities:

Established pre-emptive and
forced evacuation
[Note: This forms part of the ANY TWO of the

three rule —12(a), 12(c.2) and 12(d)]
SOURCE DOCUMENT
• EO or equivalent issuance on preemptive
and forced evacuation
12d. Pre-emptive and forced evacuation

SOCIAL PROTECTION
SOCIAL PROTECTION P HUC ICC/CC M-1st-3rd c M 4th -6th c
1. CY 2018 Seal of Child-friendly Local Governance Award    
2. At least 85% fund utilization or completion of LSB Plan     
3. GAD and VAWC mechanisms
(a) Focal Point System
(b) Updated Code – not earlier than 2009 at least
(c) Database
(d) Accomplishment report     
(e) CY 2019 Plan and Budget
(f) 100% brgys with VAWC Desk (CMs only)
(g) at least 80% of barangays submitted their VAWC reports
for all quarters 2018 (CMs only)
4. Updated Local Code for Children (CY 2009 at least)     
5. Philhealth accreditation:
At least 50% of provl govt run hospitals are 2019 or 2018 
PHILHEALTH accredited
b. At least 50% of city government-run hospitals and/or main
health facilities are 2019 or 2018 Philhealth-accredited for
MCP, AND at least 50% of main health facilities are 2019 or 
2018 Philhealth-accredited for PCB and TB-DOTS
c. 2019 or 2019 Philhealth accreditation of at least one hospital or MCP + PCB MCP + PCB
health facility for MCP, PCBand TB-DOTS  or TB DOTS or TB DOTS
SOCIAL PROTECTION P HUC ICC/CC M-1st-3rd c M 4th -6th c
3.6 Promoting the welfare of persons with disability
a. Compliance with Accessibility Law in the local government
building and a LG hospital/main health facility: Ramps with
handrails at the entrance/exit, special lift/elevator, as applicable     
b. Compliance with Accessibility Law in the local government
building and a LG hospital/main
health facility: Wheelchair-accessible toilets with grab bars
c. Persons with Disability Affairs Office (PDAO) Established office Designated officer
3.7 DSWD-accredited LGU-managed residential care facility for
the vulnerable sectors (e.g. women, children, senior citizens and PWDs)     
Consideration: Existing partnership with a DSWD-accredited facility, public or private, captured
in a MOA and institutional arrangements spelled out
3.8 LSWDO is a registered social worker
Consideration: LSWDO is vacated sometime in July 2018 or later due to retirement, resignation
or death of incumbent, but there is a designated OIC that is also a RSW Exemption: In the case
where the head of Office was hired prior to enactment of RA 9433 or the Magna Carta for     
Social Workers in April 11, 2007; there must be at least a RSW working as a technical staff in
the office
3.9 IPMR, if applicable     
3.10 Absence of illegal dwelling units/structures, OR LGU
efforts for resettlement of informal settlers i.e., at least 50% accomplishment    
of either the Local Shelter Plan, or resettlement PPAs
3.11 Full utilization of funds for Salintubig/water project CY    
2012-2016 (at least 50% for CY 2017), if applicable *Physical completion 
consideration no longer applies
SOCIAL PROTECTION
1. Seal of Child-friendly Local Governance, CY 2018
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT
Form 3.3 For RAT
CM
Awardee of the Seal of CFLG for CY 2018 per
CWC list
Consideration is given to an LGU, that passed

per DILG-RO level rating
SOURCE DOCUMENT
• Certificate provided by CWC for 2018
Seal of Child-friendly Local
Governance (SCFLG)
• List of SCFLG awardees for CY 2018
from CWC
In case of inconsistency between local data

and NGA data, RAT must fill-out Change
Request Form for further verification.
SOCIAL PROTECTION
1. Seal of Child-friendly Local Governance, CY 2018

SOCIAL PROTECTION
2. Completion rate of, or fund utilization for,
2018 Local School Board (LSB) Plan
Form 3.3 For RAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENT
At least 85% completion rate on
either PPAs or utilization rate of fund
allocation for 2018 LSB Plan
SOURCE DOCUMENT
• Certified Form 2D
• CY 2018 Accomplishment Report
of LSB Plan
• CY 2018 Financial Report of LSB
Plan
Cut off date: as of Dec 31, 2018

SOCIAL PROTECTION
2018 Local School Board (LSB) Plan

SOCIAL PROTECTION
Form 2D 2018 Local School Board (LSB) Plan
SOCIAL PROTECTION
3. Mechanisms for GAD, and VAWC
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT
Form 3.3 For RAT
5 GAD mechanisms present:

1.Focal point system
2.Database
3. 2018 Accomplishment report
4. Updated GAD Code
5. CY 2019 Plan and Budget
reviewed by DILG Field Office;
consideration is given to plan and
budget that is at least submitted for
review
SOCIAL PROTECTION
cont. of the MINIMUM REQUIREMENT
* There is a new Code adopted not earlier than CY
2014 or an existing Code has been amended or
revised by a new ordinance enacted not earlier
than CY 2014.
*Consideration may be given to an LGU with:
(a) existing Code that is adopted not earlier than CY
2009,
(b) old Code that has been amended or revised by a
new ordinance enacted not earlier than CY 2009;
or
(c) for component cities and municipalities, localized
Provincial GAD Code; provided it was enacted
not earlier than 2009 by the originating
Sanggunian.
SOCIAL PROTECTION
Form 3.3 For RAT

SOURCE DOCUMENT
• E.O or similar issuance on the creation,
strengthening and institutionalization of
LGU GAD Focal Point System
• Ordinance approving the GAD Code
• If city or municipality adopted the
Provincial GAD Code, resolution
adopting the said Code
• Printed / electronic /online GAD
database or information management
system that can generate gender
statistics, and sex-disaggregated data
• CY 2018 GAD Accomplishment Report
• Certified Form 2E
SOCIAL PROTECTION

SOCIAL PROTECTION
Form 2E
SOCIAL PROTECTION

The following VAWC mechanisms:
1. 100% of barangays with VAWC
desks
2. At least 80% of barangays with
submitted reports for all quarters of
CY 2018
SOURCE DOCUMENT
• List of barangays with VAW
Desks/Monitoring Report of the
Submission of Barangay Quarterly
VAWC Reports
• Certified Form 2J
SOCIAL PROTECTION

SOCIAL PROTECTION
Form 2J
SOCIAL PROTECTION
4. Local Code for Children
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT
Code for Children must be updated not earlier
than CY 2014, or the existing Code has been
amended or revised by a new ordinance
enacted not earlier than CY 2014.
Consideration may be given to an LGU with:

(a) existing Code that is adopted not earlier
than CY 2009,
(b) (b) old Code that has been amended or
revised by a new ordinance enacted not
earlier than CY 2009; or
(c) for component cities and municipalities,
localized Provincial GAD Code; provided it
was enacted not earlier than 2009 by the
originating Sanggunian.
SOCIAL PROTECTION
Form 3.3 For RAT

SOURCE DOCUMENT
• Ordinance approving the Local Code
for Children
• Ordinance amending/revising
existing Children Code
• In case the city or municipality
localized the Provincial Code of
Children: Resolution referring to said
localization
• In case the Code for Children is
integrated in another code (e.g Code
of General Ordinances), copy of said
Code or ordinance will be the MOV
SOCIAL PROTECTION

SOCIAL PROTECTION
5. Philhealth accreditation of LGU run hospitals and main health facilities, CY 2018 or 2019
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT
Form 3.3 For RAT Provinces: At least 50% of LGU-run hospitals are 2019 or
2018 Philhealth-accredited
HUCs: At least 50% of LGU-run hospitals, if any, and/or
main health centers are 2019 or 2018 Philhealth-
accredited for MCP, PCB and TB-DOTS
ICCs/CCs: At least one LGU-managed main hospital or
health facility is 2019 or 2018 Philhealth- accredited,
for all 3 – MCP, PCB and TB-DOTS (not necessarily a 3-
in-1 accreditation)
Municipalities: At least one LGU-managed health facility
or rural health unit is 2019 or 2018 Philhealth-
accredited for MCP, and either PCB or TB-DOTS (not
necessarily a 2-in-1 accreditation)
Consideration is given to an ICC/CC/ municipality where a

2019 or 2018 Philhealth-accredited provincial or district
hospital is located in.
SOCIAL PROTECTION
5. Philhealth accreditation of LGU run hospitals and
main health facilities, CY 2018 or 2019
Form 3.3 For RAT SOURCE DOCUMENT

• Copy(ies) of 2018 and 2019 Philhealth-
accreditation certificates of LGU-run
hospital(s) and/or facilities
• List of 2018 and 2019 accredited LGU-
managed health facilities from
Philhealth
• List of LGU-managed health facilities(as
of 1st quarter of 2019) from DOH
In case of inconsistency between local data

and NGA data, RAT must fill-out Change
Request Form for further verification.
SOCIAL PROTECTION

Form 2L
SOCIAL PROTECTION
Form 2L
SOCIAL PROTECTION
SOCIAL PROTECTION
6a. Compliance with Accessibility Law
must have the following in the LG
buildings:
1. Ramps with 2-level handrails on both sides,

and passed the Ramp Gradient Finder Test
Exemptions:
- Ground level entrance or exit
- With dropped curb due to an elevation of short
distance and its lowest point does not
exceed 25 mm from the road or gutter, and
it also passed the Ramp Gradient Test
- With special lift or elevator at the ground level
- For ramps with only one handrail (2-level): If
ramp is adjacent to a wall and has a width less
than 1.20m.
SOCIAL PROTECTION
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT
Form 3.3 For RAT Consideration may be given to the following
conditions:
- LG building is a historical site, provided
that LGU has facility or building catering
to all PWDrelated concerns or services
- LG building is under construction,
provided that LGU has facility or building
catering to all PWDrelated concerns
or services and construction plans
include provision of ramps with 2- level
handrails
AND
SOCIAL PROTECTION
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT
Form 3.3 For RAT
2. PWD Toilet
Consideration may be given in case LG
building is under construction, provided
that LGU has facility or building catering to
all PWD-related concerns or services and
construction plans include provision of
ramps with 2-level handrails
Consideration may be given in case LG

building is under construction, provided
that LGU has facility or building catering to
all PWD-related concerns or services and
construction plans include provision of
ramps with 2-level handrails
SOCIAL PROTECTION
SOURCE DOCUMENT
For ramps:
• Certified Form 2E (Photo documentation)  Actual inspection of ramps
• In case the LG building is a historical site as certified by the NHIP: copy of NHIP certification
• In case the LG building is under construction: copy of building plan which must indicate that
the establishment of a ramp is one of its features
For PWD toilets:

• Actual inspection of PWD toilets
• In case the LG building is a historical site as certified by the NHIP: copy of NHIP certification
Based on CY 2018 SGLG assessment on this criterion:

• List of LGUs that passed this criterion
• List of LGUs with valid exemptions
SOCIAL PROTECTION

SOCIAL PROTECTION
Form 2E
SOCIAL PROTECTION
Form 2E
SOCIAL PROTECTION
Form 2E
SOCIAL PROTECTION
Form 2E
SOCIAL PROTECTION
6b. Established Persons with Disability Office (PDAO)
Form 3.3 For RAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: Provinces & HUCs
PDA Office established by an ordinance, and a
permanent PDAO Head whose appointment has
undergone the prescribed recruitment process
Consideration is given to a province/HUC with PDAO

established through an executive order provided that
there is at least a designated PWD affairs officer
CCs and municipalities: Designated of a PDA

Officer/focal person
SOCIAL PROTECTION
SOURCE DOCUMENT
• Ordinance or executive order creating PDAO
• Appointment of PDAO with CSC attestation (In case the LGU is accredited, the CSC
Resolution granting the LGU authority to take final action on its appointment)
• Minutes of general assembly with PWD sector
• Executive order constituting PSB (with name of employee with disability as
member), OR Minutes of the assembly nominating an observer from PWD
organization
• For component cities and municipalities: Executive Order designating a PDA
officer or focal person
SOCIAL PROTECTION

SOCIAL PROTECTION
7. DSWD-accredited LGU-managed residential care facility
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT
Form 3.3 For RAT
Provinces and HUCs:
residential care facility for the vulnerable
sectors (e.g. women, children, senior citizens
and PWDs)
Consideration is given to an LGU that has a

standing partnership with an entity (DSWD
Field Office or private SWDA) managing a
DSWD-accredited residential care facility, as
substantiated by a valid Memorandum of
Agreement detailing institutional
arrangements of the two parties, or a proof
of transfer of resident(s) to partner-DSWD FO
managed facility.
SOCIAL PROTECTION
SOURCE DOCUMENT
• List of residential care facilities accredited by DSWD-Standards Bureau
• Accreditation of the facility issued by DSWD- Standards Bureau
• In case partner-facility is managed by DSWD Field Office: (a) Accreditation of issued by

DSWD- Standards Bureau; and (b) Proof of transfer of resident(s) e.g., legal documents
• In case partner-facility is private-Social Welfare and Development Agency (SWDA): (a)

Accreditation of the facility issued by DSWD- Standards Bureau; and (b) Memorandum of
Agreement between LGU and partner-organization managing the facility
In case of inconsistency between LGU and DSWD data, RAT must fill-out Change Request Form
for further verification.
SOCIAL PROTECTION

SOCIAL PROTECTION
8. LSWDO is a registered social worker MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: Provinces, cities and municipalities
Appointed (in permanent status, and CSC-attested)
Form 3.3 For RAT Provincial/City/ Municipal Social Welfare and Development
Officer that is a registered social worker
Exemption: - In the case where LSWDO was hired prior to the

enactment of RA 9433 or the Magna Carta for Social Workers in
2007,. there must be at least a registered social worker serving
as technical staff in the office
Consideration is given to an LGU with appointed LSWDO that is

RSW, but copy of appointment is still for CSC attestation.
Consideration is also given to an LGU with a recently vacated

plantilla LSWDO position because the incumbent was separated
from service e.g., resignation/retirement; provided that:
1. Vacancy happened within June 2017 to June 2018
2. Efforts to hire new LDRRMO is already ongoing
3. With a designated LSWDO head
4. At least 1 LSWDO staff is RSW
Form 3.3 For RAT
SOCIAL PROTECTION
8. LSWDO is a registered social worker
SOURCE DOCUMENT
• Appointment of
P/C/MSWDO with CSC-
attestation (In case the
LGU is accredited, the
CSC Resolution granting
the LGU authority to
take final action on its
appointment)
• PRC license of LSWDO
• In case the exemption
applies: PRC license of
RSW LSWDO staff
SOCIAL PROTECTION
8. LSWDO is a registered social worker

SOCIAL PROTECTION
9. Indigenous Peoples Mandatory Representation in the Sanggunian
(applicable only to LGUs with IPs whose representative in the Sanggunian
has received a Certificate of Affirmation or COA from NCIP)

Provinces, cities and municipalities whose
IPMR has COA and all of the following
conditions met:
1. IPMR is seated in the sanggunian
2. IPMR receives compensation and other
regular benefits of a Sanggunian Member
3. IPMR attends meetings as indicated in
the minutes
Consideration may be given to an LGU with

extenuating circumstances, subject to the
National Quality Committee deliberation.
SOCIAL PROTECTION
Form 3.3 For RAT

SOURCE DOCUMENT
• Certificate of Affirmation received by IPMR
• At least one payroll in CY 2019
• Minutes of the Meetings in CY 2018 and CY
2019
• NCIP List of LGUs with Certificate of
Affirmation
• List of LGUs with Certificate of Affirmation
based on 2018 SGLG assessment
• In case CoA has already lapsed, an NCIP-RO
hold-over resolution
In case of inconsistency in LGU data and provided

data, RAT must fill-out Change Request Form for
further verification.
SOCIAL PROTECTION
SOCIAL PROTECTION
10. Absence of illegal dwelling units OR LGU efforts for resettlement of informal settlers
Form 3.3 For RAT
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: Cities only

No illegal dwelling units OR
at least 50% accomplishment of CY

2018 targets in the approved City
Shelter Plan or resettlement PPAs
contained in the AIP
Consideration is given to a city with

an office, task force or similar entity;
and has an approved Local Shelter
Plan.
SOCIAL PROTECTION
10. Absence of illegal dwelling units OR LGU efforts for resettlement of informal settlers
Form 3.3 For RAT SOURCE DOCUMENT

• Certified Form 2H
• Resolution adopting the City Shelter
Plan
• Status or accomplishment report on
housing projects for CY 2018 target, as
indicated in the Plan, or resettlement
PPAs contained in 2018 AIP
• Ordinance, EO or similar issuance
creating a Housing Office or task force
for the control, prevention or removal
of illegal dwelling units as well as, lead
in implementation of housing/ human
settlements projects
SOCIAL PROTECTION
10. Absence of illegal dwelling units OR LGU efforts for resettlement of
informal settlers

SOCIAL PROTECTION
10. Absence of illegal dwelling
units OR LGU efforts for
resettlement of informal settlers
Form 2H
SOCIAL PROTECTION
11. Implementation of Provision of Potable Water Supply-Sagana at Ligtas
na Tubig sa Lahat (SALINTUBIG) projects
Form 3.3 For RAT
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT
For beneficiary cities and
municipalities:
1. 100% utilization of funds

received in CYs 2012 to
2016, AND
2. At least 50% utilization for

funds received in CY 2017
SOCIAL PROTECTION
SOURCE DOCUMENT
Form 3.3 For RAT • Certified Forms 2A
• Status of financial accomplishment of
SALINTUBIG projects for funds received in
CY 2012-2017 in the LGU
• List of SALINTUBIG LGU-beneficiaries
from DILG -OPDS
• Status of SALINTUBIG Projects from DILG-
OPDS reported as of CY 2019 1st Quarter
Notes:
a. In case of data inconsistency, RAT must
reconcile data, if necessary, with the
Region’s PDMU
SOCIAL PROTECTION

SOCIAL PROTECTION
Form 2A
PEACE & ORDER
4.PEACE AND ORDER P HUC ICC/CC M-1st-3rd c M 4th -6th c
4.1 Passed the 2018 Peace and Order (POC) Performance

Audit or met the following:
4.1.1. POC convened (ALL quarters)     
4.1.2 At least 75% completion or utilization of Peace and
Order, and Public Safety (POPS) Plan
4.2 Convened ADAC     
4.3 Provided logistical support to local PNP in CY 2018     
4.4 Barangay Peacekeeping Action Teams: 100% organized     

and 100% trained
4.5 Drug-free city/municipality or increase in drug-cleared

barangays    

4.6 Designated firecracker zones    
PEACE AND ORDER
1. Peace and Order (POC) Performance Audit rating, CY 2018
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT
PCM
Form 3.4 For RAT
CY 2018 POC Performance
audit passer; OR met items 2
and 3
SOURCE DOCUMENT
List of LGUs that passed CY 2018

rating from BLGS-PCMD
In case of inconsistency between

local data and NGA data, RAT
must fill-out Change Request
Form for further verification.
PEACE AND ORDER
2. POC convened

PCM
POC convened, at least once
every quarter for all quarters of CY
2018
SOURCE DOCUMENT
*Certified Form 2I
* Minutes of the Meetings for
CY 2018
PEACE AND ORDER
2. POC convened
Form 2I
PEACE AND ORDER
2. POC convened

PEACE AND ORDER
3. Peace and Order, and Public
Safety (POPS) Plan
implementation
Form 3.4 For RAT

MINIMUM REQUIREMENT
PCM
Adopted plan, and at least

75% completion of, OR
utilization of fund allocated
for, POPS Plan programs
and/or activities within CY
2018
PEACE AND ORDER
Safety (POPS) Plan
implementation
SOURCE DOCUMENT
• Certified Forms 2A
• LPOC Secretariat Report for CY 2018
• Data on utilization of funds allocated for POPS Plan program/ activities targeted in CY
2018
• CY 2018 POPS Plan Accomplishment Report
• Data on Physical and Financial Accomplishments for CY 2018 submitted to the NPOC
Secretariat (BLGS-PCMD) thru DILG Intranet reporting system as reference
Note: Cut-off date is Dec. 31, 2018

PEACE AND ORDER
Safety (POPS) Plan
implementation
PEACE AND ORDER
Safety (POPS) Plan
implementation
Form 2A
Form 2E PEACE AND ORDER
Safety (POPS) Plan
implementation
PEACE AND ORDER
Form 3.4 For RAT 4. Anti-drug abuse council
organized
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT
PCM
Organized ADAC, and

met at least once
every quarter for all
CY 2018 quarters
SOURCE DOCUMENT
• Minutes of the
Meetings for CY 2018
• EO or similar issuance
creating / activating
P/C/MADAC
PEACE AND ORDER
4. Anti-drug abuse council
organized

PEACE AND ORDER
COMPOSITION organized
(a)Composition (MC 98-227, 2012-94)

Chairman: Governor/ Mayor
Vice Chair : PNP Provincial / City Director / Chief of Police as
Members:
1. DILG Provincial Director (in the case of provinces)
2. DepEd Division Superintendent/ District Supervisor
3. DOJ Provincial/ City Prosecutor/ Municipal Judge
4. Local Health Officer
5. LSWDO
6. Local Information Officer
7. NGO/ Socio-Civic Group Representative
8. Religious group representative
Form 2I PEACE AND ORDER
organized
PEACE AND ORDER
5. Provision of logistical support
to the PNP
Form 3.4 For RAT
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT
PCM
With logistical support
provided such as
ammunition,
communication, vehicles,
police station, supplies for
CY 2018
SOURCE DOCUMENT
*Certified Form 2I
PEACE AND ORDER
to the PNP

Form 2I
PEACE AND ORDER
to the PNP
PEACE AND ORDER
6. Organized and trained BPATs, barangay tanods, and/or any similar unit
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT
Form 3.4 For RAT CM
100% of barangays with organized
BPATs, barangay tanods, and/or
any similar unit, and trained
any similar unit (trained within
the last three year not earlier than
2016)
SOURCE DOCUMENT
* Certified Form 2I
* List of barangays with organized
other similar units
* List of barangays with trained BPATs,
barangay tanods, and/or other
similar units
PEACE AND ORDER
6. Organized and trained BPATs,
barangay tanods, and/or any
similar unit

PEACE AND ORDER
6. Organized and trained BPATs,
barangay tanods, and/or any
2I similar unit
PEACE AND ORDER
7. Actions against illegal drugs: Drug-cleared barangays
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT
Form 3.4 For RAT
CM
Drug-free city/municipality as
declared by the Oversight
Committee, or increase in drug-
cleared barangays
SOURCE DOCUMENT
*Data on drug situation and/or drug
clearing operations in the LGU from
PDEA-RO and/or PDEA-Central
Office
*Certification of drug-cleared
barangay per DDB resolution no. 03
s. 2017
PEACE AND ORDER
7. Actions against illegal drugs:
Drug-cleared barangays

PEACE AND ORDER
8. Firecracker and pyrotechnic devices regulation
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT
Form 3.4 For RAT CM
Ordinance or similar issuance
stating total ban of firecrackers
and pyrotechnic devices OR
designating specific zones for
manufacturing, display and
exhibition of firecrackers
SOURCE DOCUMENT
*Ordinance or similar issuance stating total ban of
firecrackers and pyrotechnic devices OR
designating specific zones for manufacturing,
display and exhibition of firecrackers
*List of LGUs that passed this criterion based on CY
2018 SGLG assessment
PEACE AND ORDER
8. Firecracker and pyrotechnic
devices regulation

BUSINESS
FRIENDLINESS &
COMPETITIVENESS
5. BUSINESS- FRIENDLINESS AND COMPETITIVENESS P HUC ICC/CC M-1st-3rd c M 4th -6th c
5.1a Finalist of 2018 PCCI’s Most Business-Friendly LGUs Award     
5.1b Ranked among the Top 50 Cities and Top 50 Municipalities of the    
2018 Competitiveness Index or
ALL of the following:
5.2 Established LEIP Office    At least a designated
officer
5.3 Updated citizens charter    
5.4 Simplified business processing and licensing system: (a) not more    
than 3 steps, both for new and renewal of business; (b) not more
than 1 day processing time for business renewal; (c) not more
than 2 days processing for new business; and (d) Business-One-
Stop-Shop
5.5 Computerized tracking system of economic data: (a) no. of new
business; (b) no. of business renewal; (c) amount of capital
investment derived from registered new businesses; and (d) no. of ALL 4 At least At least 3 of At least 3
employees derived from registered new businesses and business 3 of the 4 of
renewals the 4 the 4
5.6 Updated local investment and incentives code - not earlier than   
2009 at least
5.7 Full utilization rate of CMGP for CY 2016 (at least 60% for CY2017) 
5. BUSINESS FRIENDLINESS & COMPETITIVENESS
1a. Finalist of the PCCI's Most Business-Friendly LGUs Award

Form 3.5 For RAT
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT
PCM
2018 Finalist of the PCCI’s
Most Business-Friendly LGUs
Award; OR met item 1b; OR
met items #2 to #7
SOURCE DOCUMENT
• Recognition received
from PCCI
• List of LGU Finalists of
Most Business-Friendly
LGUs Award from PCCI
1a. Finalist of the PCCI's Most Business-Friendly LGUs Award

1b. Ranked among the Top 50 (Top 50 Cities and Top 50
Municipalities) of the 2018 Competitiveness Index
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT
Form 3.5 For RAT
CM
Belongs to the Top 50 cities
and Top 50 municipalities of
the 2018 Competitiveness
Index; OR met item 1a; OR
met items #2 to #7
SOURCE DOCUMENT
*Recognition received from
NCC
*List of Top 50 Cities and Top
50 Municipalities in the
2018 Competitiveness
Index from DTI
1b. Ranked among the Top 50 (Top 50 Cities and Top 50

Municipalities) of the 2018 Competitiveness Index

2. Presence of local economic and investment promotion office (LEIPO
Form 3.5 For RAT
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT
Provinces and cities : Established
LEIPO i.e., has structure,
organization and staff (An
equivalent office may not
necessarily carry the exact name,
as long as it performs all the
functions a LEIPO is created for)
Municipalities: designated LEIP

Officer
SOURCE DOCUMENT
• Ordinance creating LEIP office
• Executive order or similar issuance designating
an officer for LEIP with listed functions, duties
and responsibilities
2. Presence of local economic and investment promotion office (LEIPO

3. Presence of citizen’s charter for securing permits for new business
and business renewal
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT
Form 3.5 For RAT Cities and municipalities:
Citizen’s Charter visible within BPLO
and updated to reflect current fees and
prescribed processing time for business
registrations:
1. Two (2) days for new business
permit applications, and
2. One (1) day for business permit
renewals. The same should be
reflected in the Citizens Charter.
SOURCE DOCUMENT
• Actual posted Citizen’s Charter
• Ordinance or similar issuance adopting
citizen’s charter



Form 2E
4. Simplified business processing and licensing system
Form 3.5 For RAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
Cities
Citiesand
andmunicipalities:
municipalities: MustMust
meetmeet the
following:
the following:
1. 1. Business or
Business or mayor's
mayor'spermit released
permit released in:
in: (a) Not more than 3 steps, both for
(a)new
Notand more than 3 steps, both for new
renewal of business; (b) Not
and renewal
more of business;
than 1 day processing time for
(b)business
Not more thanand
renewal; 1 day processing
(c)Not more time
than
for2business
days processing for new
renewal; and
business
(c)Not more than 2 days processing for
2. Presence of Business One Stop Shop
new business
2. Presence of Business One Stop Shop
SOURCE DOCUMENTS
*Certified Form 2B
*Sample transactions for renewal and new businesses for 2018
*Memorandum of Agreement or any document that proves the
establishment of BOSS (seasonal or all-year round)

Form 2B 5. BUSINESS FRIENDLINESS & COMPETITIVENESS
Form 2E
5. Tracking system for business / investment related data LGU
Form 3.5 For RAT

HUCs: Computerized or computer aided
tracking system and must be able to
provide all four economic data required
ICCs/CCs and municipalities:

Computerized or computer-aided
tracking system and must be able to
provide at least 3 of the economic data
required
SOURCE DOCUMENTS
Database or electronically-generated
report where business application
forms are tracked and summarized
5. Tracking system for business / investment related data
LGU

6. Local Investment Incentive Code MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
Provinces and cities: Code must be
Form 3.5 RAT updated not earlier than CY 2014, or the
existing Code has been amended or
revised by a new ordinance enacted not
earlier than CY 2014.
Consideration may be given to an

province or city with:
(a) existing Code that is adopted not
earlier than CY 2009, or
(b) old Code that has been amended or
revised by a new ordinance enacted
not earlier than CY 2009
SOURCE DOCUMENTS
• Ordinance adopting the LIIC
• Ordinance amending/revising particular
section(s) of existing LIIC
6. Local Investment Incentive Code

7. Utilization of Conditional matching Grant to Provinces for Road
Repair, Rehabilitation and Improvement (CMGP; formerly KALSADA
program), if applicable
Form 3.5 RAT

Provinces: For beneficiary-provinces: 100%
utilization for funds received in CY 2016
and at least 60% for CY 2017
SOURCE DOCUMENTS
• Status of financial accomplishment of CMGP
projects for CY 2016 and 2017 in the province
• Status of CMGP projects from DILG-OPDS (as
of 1st quarter of 2019)
Notes:
a. In case of data inconsistency, RAT must
reconcile data, if necessary, with the Region’s
PDMU
b. Cut-off date is Dec. 31, 2018
7. Utilization of Conditional matching Grant to Provinces for Road
Repair, Rehabilitation and Improvement (CMGP; formerly KALSADA
program), if applicable

ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT P HUC ICC/CC M-1st-3rd c M 4th -6th c
1. Convened local solid waste management (SWM) board     
2. No operating open and/or controlled dumpsite

   
3. Approved 10-Year Solid Waste Management Plan  
4. Materials Recovery Facility  Any 2 of Any 2 of Any 2 of the

the 3
the 3 3
5. Access to sanitary landfill (SLF)

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Provinces: Organized PSWMB, and approved 10-Yr SWM Plan
HUCs: Met all five indicators in this area
ICCs/CCs/Municipalities:
1. Organized SWM Board,
2. no operating open and/or controlled dumpsite,
3. at least 2 of the following:
(a) approved SWM Plan
(b) MRF, and
(c) sanitary landfill
ENVIROMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Form 3.6 For RAT 1. Convened local solid waste management (SWM) board
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT
PCM
1. SWM Board composition
should show CSO and private
sector membership and the
names of representatives 2.
SWM Board convened at
least once in CY 2018
SOURCE DOCUMENT
*Executive Order or similar
issuance creating the SWM
Board
*Minutes of the Meeting in
CY 2018
1. Convened local solid waste management (SWM) board

Form 3.6 For RAT

MINIMUM REQUIREMENT
Cities and municipalities: No operating
open/controlled dumpsite within jurisdiction per
NSWMC or DENR-EMB Regional Office certification
No operating open/controlled dumpsite within

jurisdiction per NSWMC or DENR-EMB Regional Office
certification
Consideration may be given to an LGU with closed

dumpsite (per Certification and/or Inspection Report of
DENR-EMB RO) as of CY 2018, provided that it has:
1. An approved SCRP, and access to landfill; OR

2. Efforts to craft SCRP are already ongoing, indicated by
an LGU’s letter to EMB-regional office requesting for
technical assistance (letter should have been received by
EMB by Dec. 31, 2018), and access to sanitary to landfill
Form 3.6 For RAT 2. No operating open and/or controlled dumpsite
SOURCE DOCUMENT
• Certified Form 2M
• List of LGUs with operating open and
controlled dumpsite from NSWMC
• Certification from DENR-EMB
Regional Office stating that there are
no operating open and controlled
dumpsite in the LGU
• Dumpsite closure inspection report
by DENR-EMB Regional Office
• Approved Safe Closure and
Rehabilitation Plan (SCRP)
• Received copy of LGU’s letter to EMB
requesting for technical assistance in
crafting its SC

Form 2M ENVIROMENTAL MANAGEMENT
2. No operating open and/or
controlled dumpsite
2. No operating open and/or
controlled dumpsite
AGREEMENTS
3. Approved 10-Year Solid Waste Management Plan
Form 3.6 For RAT

MINIMUM REQUIREMENT
Approved 10-year SWM Plan
Consideration is given to a city or

municipality with an SWM Plan that is still
under review of NSWMC
Consideration is also given to a province if

it has at least 75% of component cities and
municipalities with approved and/or
submitted SWM plan to NSWMC.
SOURCE DOCUMENT
• List of SWM Plans approved and under review by the NSWMC

• NSWMC Resolution approving the LGU’s SWM Plan
• Approved SWM Plan
• In the case Plan is still under review of NSWMC: Received copy of LGU’s letter submitting its
Plan for NSWMC’s review
In case of inconsistency in LGU data and provided data, RAT must fill-out Change Request Form for
further verification

4. Materials Recovery Facility
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT
Form 3.6 For RAT
CM:
Material Recovery Facility (MRF), or an
existing partnership with similar entity
SOURCE DOCUMENT
• Actual MRF
• If facility is in partnership with a
private entity: Memorandum of
Agreement

Form 2E
Form 3.6 For RAT
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT
LGU-managed SLF or access to SLF thru
MOA with an entity managing same
facility
Consideration is given to an LGU with:

1. Temporary Residual Containment Area,
plus ongoing construction of LGU’s
own sanitary landfill
2. Technology that is officially recognized
by DENR-NSWMC as an alternative to
sanitary landfill
SOURCE DOCUMENT
• Certified Form 2M
• List of LGUs with sanitary landfill from NSWMC
• Actual sanitary landfill
• If in partnership with another LGU’s or private entity’s landfill: Memorandum of Agreement
• Actual temporary Residual Containment Area
• In case of ongoing construction of sanitary landfill: actual construction site of SLF; and
project progress report(s)
• In case of other means of residual waste final disposal: Proof that said technology officially
recognized by DENR-NSWMC as an alternative to sanitary landfill

Form 2M
Form 2E
TOURISM, CULTURE
AND THE ARTS
7.TOURISM, CULTURE AND THE ARTS PROV HUC ICC/CC M-1st-3rd c M 4th -6th c
Tourism Development
For LGUs where tourism is a significant industry, any TWO of the ff:
7.1.1 Permanent local tourism officer     
7.1.2 Tourist information and assistance center or desks     
7.1.3 Tracking system of tourism data (at the minimum: tourist     
arrivals and tourism enterprises)
Cultural Heritage Promotion and Conservation

Any THREE of the following:
7.2.1 Council for the promotion of culture and the arts     
7.2.2 At least 75% utilization rate of the budget appropriated for the     
conservation and preservation of cultural property, CY 2018
7.2.3 Cultural property inventory     
7.2.4 Published narrative of history and culture     
TOURISM DEVELOPMENT
For provinces, cities and municipalities where tourism is a

significant industry, must have at least 2 of the following:
1. Presence of a local tourism office or officer

2. Tourist information and assistance center or desks
3. Tracking system of tourism data
Otherwise, this sub-area is not applicable.

Tourism can be considered as a significant industry of the LGU when:
(a) Income from tourism activities form part of the LGU’s main source of
revenue;
(b) A large segment of LGU's population is employed in tourism

activities;
(c) Fund assistance is provided by the LGU for the development of this
industry; or
(d) “Philippine Tourism” brand-destinations

TOURISM DEVELOPMENT
1. Presence of local tourism officer
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT
Form 3.7 For RAT PCM: where tourism is a significant
industry: Must have a filled up
permanent position local tourism officer
For LGUs where tourism is not

considered as a significant industry, this
criterion is not applicable
SOURCE DOCUMENT
• Certified Form 2H
• Executive order or similar issuance creating a local tourism
office or designating an officer for tourism development
and promotion with listed functions, duties and
responsibilities
• Appointment of local tourism officer
• List of LGUs with destinations under “Philippine Tourism”
brand
TOURISM DEVELOPMENT

Form 2H
TOURISM DEVELOPMENT
TOURISM DEVELOPMENT
2. Tourist information and assistance center or desk MINIMUM REQUIREMENT
PCM: where tourism is a significant
industry: Actual existence of a local
tourism and assistance center or desks
Form 3.7 For RAT
with promotional materials and
references for the tourist sights found
in the LGU

considered as a significant industry,
this criterion is not applicable
SOURCE DOCUMENT
• Actual tourist information and assistance center or desk, which may be
located in the provincial/city/municipal hall
• Ordinance or similar issuance creating the tourist information and
assistance center or desk
TOURISM DEVELOPMENT
2. Tourist information and assistance center or desk

TOURISM DEVELOPMENT
2. Tourist information and assistance center or desk
Form 2E
TOURISM DEVELOPMENT
Form 3.7 For RAT/Sub RAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENT

PCM: Local tourism database either
manual or computer-aided

considered as a significant
industry, this criterion is not
applicable
SOURCE DOCUMENT
• Database or record book where
tourism data are tracked and
summarized
TOURISM DEVELOPMENT

TOURISM DEVELOPMENT
Form 2E
CULTURAL HERITAGE PROMOTION and CONSERVATION
Provinces, cities and municipalities: Must pass at least 3 of the following:
1. Presence of a local council for culture and the arts
2. At least 75% utilization rate of budget appropriated for the conservation and
preservation of cultural property
3. Presence of cultural property inventory
4. Documented and published narrative of history and culture

CULTURAL HERITAGE PROMOTION AND CONSERVATION
4. Presence of local council for culture and the arts

PCM: Presence of local council for
culture and the arts
SOURCE DOCUMENT
• Sanggunian Resolution or similar
issuance creating a local council for
culture and the arts with listed
functions, duties and
responsibilities compliant to DILG
MC 2017-133
4. Presence of local council for culture and the arts

5. Utilization of the budget appropriated for the conservation
and preservation of cultural property, CY 2018
Form 3.7 For RAT/Sub RAT
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT
PCM: At least 75% utilization rate of
the budget appropriated for the
conservation and preservation of
cultural property, CY 2018
SOURCE DOCUMENT
• 2018 Annual budget
• 2018 Annual Investment Program
5. Utilization of the budget appropriated for the conservation
and preservation of cultural property, CY 2018
Local

Form 2A CULTURAL HERITAGE PROMOTION AND CONSERVATION
5. Utilization of the budget
appropriated for the conservation
and preservation of cultural
property, CY 2018
Local
6. Cultural property inventory/registry
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT
Form 3.7 For RAT PCM:
Cultural inventory that is:
1. Updated not earlier than 2017
2. Adopted by the LGU
3. Submitted to NCCA for review
Consideration is given to LGUs with

cultural inventory that is updated not
earlier than 2017, and is yet to be
adopted and transmitted to NCCA for
review.
Form 3.7 For RAT
SOURCE DOCUMENT
• Cultural property inventory
• Letter of Acknowledgement
from NCCA
• List of LGUs with inventory
submission from NCCA
From the DILG-NCCA JMC No. 2018-01 forms
Name of Cultural Property
Location
Type of Cultural Property
Ownership
Significance

7. Published narrative of history and culture
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT
Actual published narrative available for
public consumption or reference on the
historical and cultural background of the
LGU
SOURCE DOCUMENT
• Copy of published narrative of history and
culture (website printscreen, book,
newsletter, magazine)
• Proof of LGU acknowledging narrative
published (traditional or digital) by a third
party
• List of LGUs compliant with this criterion
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT
Actual published narrative available for
public consumption or reference on the
historical and cultural background of the
LGU
SOURCE DOCUMENT
• Copy of published narrative of history and
culture (website printscreen, book,
newsletter, magazine)
• Proof of LGU acknowledging narrative
published (traditional or digital) by a third
party
• List of LGUs compliant with this criterion

Form 2E
Thank You!!!

2019 Seal of Good Local Governance

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

2019 Seal of Good Local Governance

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

2019

SEAL OF GOOD LOCAL

Form 2.1 - 2.7 PCM LGOO

Form 2A - 2M LG Dep Heads (CM) - Certifications

Form 2A - 2K LG Dep Heads (P) - Certifications

Form 2E (Photo Documentation)

Form 3.1 - 3.7 RAT (CM) - Data Capture Form

Form 3.1 - 3.7 RAT (P) - Data Capture Form

Tab B Criteria matrix

Tab A Technical Notes

1.3 Financing Development

1.3.2 Fund Utilization of NGA-supported capital investment proj.

b. Full Utilization rate of Performance Challenge Fund

c. Full utilization of Assistance to Municipalities program

1.3.3. CY 2019 budget is approved within the prescribed period

QUALIFIED/UNQUALIFIED OPINION 30% OF RECOMMENDATIONS ACTED UPON

See section: Status of Implementation Prior Years’

contains: total audit recommendations; and no. of

For data provided by partner agencies

1. Audit Opinion Qualified/Unqualified + 30% of recommendations fully complied with

2.1 For the C/MLGOO

1. Audit Opinion Qualified/Unqualified + 30% of recommendations fully complied with

Take Note : compute only the FULLY COMPLIED recommendations

No more PARTIALLY COMPLIED which was considered in the 2018 SGLG

Form 3.1 For RAT

Form 3.1 For RAT

2.1 For the C/MLGOO

3. Average local revenue growth from CYs 2015 to 2017

3. Average local revenue growth from CYs 2015 to 2017

Form 3.1 For the RAT

Form 3.1 For RAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENT:

Form 3.1 For RAT SOURCE DOCUMENT:

4b. Functional LDC: Satisfactory participation of its CSO members

2.1 For the C/MLGOO

Consideration is given to an LGU that met

b. Cut-off date as of Dec. 31, 2018

2.1 For the C/MLGOO

Regardless of justification utilization will be treated as utilization

Form 3.1 For RAT

Computation: (Total Utilized Fund / Total Fund

6. Utilization rate of Performance Challenge Fund, if applicable

Form 3.1 For RAT

6. Utilization rate of Performance Challenge Fund, if applicable

2.1 For the C/MLGOO

6. Utilization rate of Performance Challenge Fund, if applicable

6. Utilization rate of Performance Challenge Fund, if applicable

• Notice to Implement – reckoning period

Form 3.1 For RAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENT:

100% utilization of DILG-managed

Fund utilized refers to fund disbursed.

2.1 For the C/MLGOO

8. Approved CY 2018 annual budget

2.1 For the C/MLGOO

2.1.3. Early warning system (EWS)     

2.1.4. Evacuation management

2.1.5 Systems and structures Items a

Upon official release, awardees of the

Form 3.2 For RAT

• List of 2018 1st Place National

2.2 For the C/MLGOO

2.2 For the C/MLGOO

1st to 3rd class mun: plantilla LDRRMO III (SG 18) at