Lecture Analysis and Examination of Strategy Execution

PNP P.A.T.R.O.L.
Plan 2030:
“Peace & Order Agenda for Transformation &
Upholding of the Rule-Of-Law”
Audit Findings and Recommendation
Element 2- Analysis and Examination of Strategy

Execution
Proficiency
Elements
Analysis and Examination of Strategy Execution
Regular Monitoring,
Functional Scorecard up Cascading of Strategy
Review and Reporting of
to Individual Level down to Individual Level
Strategy
REGULAR MONITORING, REVIEW AND REPORTING OF STRATEGY
STRATEGY REVIEW: Regular / continuous refresh based on learning and feedback
Criteria: Sustained reporting
Rating
Measure Source Procedure
5 4 3 2 1
Aging of
*AAR submission of
*Minutes of after- OR reports
Meetings vs date of actual
More
Timely Submission *Operations conduct of OR
1st wk 2nd wk 3rd wk 4th wk than a
of After- OR Report Review Matrix Note: Rate each
month
*Attendance of the submitted
Sheet After- OR
*Action Photos conducted then
get the average
SUBMISSION STATUS OF AFTER- OR REPORTS FOR CY 2015
DATE CONDUCTED DATE SUBMITTED INTERVAL REFERENCE RATING
January 13-Feb-15 13-Feb-15 within 1 week Memo dated February 13, 2015 5
February 5-Mar-15 5-Mar-15 within 1 week Memo dated March 6, 2015 5
March - - - - 1
April - - - - 1
May - - - - 1
June 2-July-15 2-July-15 within 1 week Memo dated July 2, 2015 5
July 14-Aug-15 17-Aug-15 within 1 week Memo dated August 17, 2015 5
August 7-Sept-15 7-Sept-15 within 1 week Memo dated September 7, 2015 5
September 15-Oct-15 4-Nov-15 within 3 weeks Memo dated November 4, 2015 3
October - - - - 1
November - - - - 1
December - - - - 1
34 points devided by 60
56.67%
Criteria: Sustained reporting
Rating
5 4 3 2 1
*Accomplishment
Reports (Monthly/
Document
Quarterly)
Review:
Submitted to
Higher Unit/
# of supporting
No. of Actual Office &
documents on
Accomplishments Submitted by 1 - 0.90 0.70 0.4
actual 0.2 - 0
with Supporting Subordinate 0.91 -0.71 -0.41 -0.21
accomplishments
Documents Units
per Performance
*Other Regular
Indicator vs
Reports
# of Performance
Submitted to
Indicator
Higher Units/
Offices
Performance Indicator with Supporting Documents
Performance Indicator Accomplishment Remarks
CRIME PREVENTION
Nr. Of community awareness Activities initiated 3,616 Ok
Number of sectoral groups organized/ mobilized (BPATs members organized & force multipliers) 3,695
Number of participating respondents(FBSkype/OfficeTwitter) 9,027
Number accounted Renewed firearms 52
Number of accounted Unregistered firearms 47 Ok
Number of functional LACAP 10 Ok
Number of target hardening measures conducted 1,586 Ok
Percentage reduction in crimes involving foreign and domestic tourists 100% Ok
Number of police stations fully utilizing PIPS 11 Ok
Reduction in crime volume 783 Ok
a, Combat operations 25 Ok
Number of ISO related activities conducted:
b. Combat security patrol 3,990
Number of police stations using COMSTAT for crime prevention 11 Ok
Number of Wanted persons arrested 206 Ok
Increase in number of opns against Illegal drugs 153 Ok
Increase in number of opns against Illegal gambling 49 Ok
Increase in number of opns against No Plate no Travel 2,168 Ok
Increase in number of opns against Illegal Logging 16 Ok
Increase in number of opns against Illegal Fishing 8 Ok
Number of organized and utilized BINs 450 Ok
Number of criminal cases filed against threat groups (CNN, OCG) 2
Number of threat groups members convicted (CNN,OCG) 0
Performance Indicator Accomplishment Remarks
CRIME SOLUTION
Number of trained investigators 71 Ok
% of investigative positions filled up with trained/certified investigations 100% Ok
Number of mins on response time (for every 7-10kms) 10 Mins Ok
a. WCPC 24 Ok
Number of Trained investigators handling in: b. Crimes against persons and property 44 Ok
c. Traffic accidents 11 Ok
Nr of investigators rewarded 71
Nr of investigators punished 1 Ok
No. of seminars Or Conferences Conducted for investigators 8
Number of Units using Web-based System 12 Ok
Number of cases filed in court (drug-related and heinous crimes) 157 Ok
Improved Crime solution Efficiency (CSE) 50.06 Ok
Improved Crime Clearance Efficiency (CCE) 56.58 Ok
Number of investigative infrastructure/equipment identified/accounted 33 Ok
Percentage filled-up IIE 55% Ok
a. IT complaint Stations 100%
Percentage of:
b. CT complaint Stations 100%
Number of linkages established 113
Number of community/ stakeholders support generated 64
Number of investigative activities funded 176
Number of special investigation supported 12
Criteria: Sustained Sustained reporting
Rating
5 4 3 2 1
Document
Review:
Updated Activities 1- 0.90- 0.70- 0.4-
Activities Profiles # of updated 0.2-0
Profile 0.91 0.71 0.41 0.21
initiative profile vs
# of initiatives
Activities with Activities Profile
Activities Remarks
CRIME PREVENTION
House, school and church visitation -
Community dialogue and awareness (pulong-pulong and awareness lectures) -
Print Media (Information, Education and Communication (IEC) materials) -
Conduct Sambayan activities (mass feeding, livelihood program, distribution of slippers) -
Establishment of Police Assistance desks during special occasions & holidays -
Conduct of BPATS Training -
Mobilization of BPATs -
Create and maintain FB , skype & Twitter account for Public access -
Conduct Online Survey -
Conduct public information of FAs control program -
Establishment of FAs desks in the municipal stations -
Implementation of SW against delinquent gun holders -
Establishment of checkpoints and implementation of Oplan Bakal and KONTRA BOGA -
Coordination with FESAGS 13 -
Conduct of Oplan Katok -
Formulate and present LACAP program to LCES for adoption thru POC -
Implementation of LACAP -
Conduct of security survey -
Conduct of intelligence monitoring and validations -
Attend JPSCC meetings -
Beat Patrol -
Foot Patrol -
Activities Remarks
CRIME PREVENTION
Mobile Patrol -
Establishment of one-stop shop tourist assistance desk for tourist destinations -
Conduct of Bike patrol -
Coordinate with DOT, PPOC and RHQ -
Monitoring of TACs / TADs "BANTAY TURISTA" -
Send personnel for TOPCOP -
Conduct of Police visibility patrols -
Conduct of checkpoints/implementation of OPLANs -
Coordination with Military and other LEA -
Information gathering and surveillance activities -
Implementation of PATROL 101 -
Strict implementation of PIPS -
Consolidation of reports -
Make representation for request of support -
Conduct major combat operations -
Daily conduct of Combat Security Patrol -
Conduct of minor combat operations -
Conduct of rifle exercises -
Coordination with friendly forces -
Conduct Monthly COMSTAT update -
Maintain & Update Crime Map & Crime Clock, and Crime Stat -
Review and implement responsive police operations based on COMSTAT -
Activities Remarks
CRIME PREVENTION
Conduct of PATROL 101 -
Validation of watch list -
Conduct intel monitoring on illegal activities -
Implementation of COPLANs -
Conduct of checkpoints -
Implementation of WOA and SW -
Consolidation of accomplishment reports -
Selection / recruitment of BINS -
Conduct Seminar to BIN members -
Regular coordination/meeting -
Consolidation of info from BIN -
Inventory of cases filed -
Follow up and monitoring of cases -
Conduct seminars for investigators in coordination with other pillars of CJS -
Monitoring of threat groups or lawless elements -
Performance Indicator Remarks
CRIME SOLUTION
Recommend personnel of to undergo investigation course -
Inventory of trained investigators -
Accounting and designating of trained investigator to investigative position -
Conduct dry run/mock exercise -
Monitor the terrain conditions within the AOR -
Maintenance of vehicles and communication equipment -
Direct all COP to issue order to designate trained investigators -
Account all assigned trained investigators with specialization -
Send more trained investigators to specialized trainings or seminars under traffic investigation -
Account all accomplishment of investigators -
Recommend to HHQs for the issuance of appropriate award -
Account the investigators committed violations of the POPs / Human Rights Guidelines -
Submit documents for summary hearing -
Recommend for CADET -
Initiate seminars/conferences for investigators -
Coordinate with other stakeholders for possible financial assistance -
Assign ICT property custodian -
Account all ICT equipment utilized -
Repair of defective ICT -
Consolidate the report on case monitoring -
Inventory of cases filed -
Conduct seminars for investigators in coordination with other pillars of CJS -
CRIME SOLUTION
Monitoring of threat groups or lawless elements -
Direct all COP to submit monthly crime statistics -
Consolidate data from the lower units -
Assess crime statistics using the crime clock and location to formulate crime prevention strategies. -
Account the investigative infrastructure and equipment -
Consolidate the report -
Prepare a budget proposal and submit to POC -
Purchase additional investigative equipment -
Assign ICT property custodian -
Account all ICT utilized -
Repair defective ICT equipment -
Coordination with Barangay Officials and Tanods and other sectoral groups -
Attend POC meetings/ maintain hotline numbers for constant contact with stakeholders -
Generate support from stakeholders re-incentive and award system -
Generate support from stakeholders for investigative and other operational activities -
Account all investigative activities funded -
Consolidate and submit reports to POC /Stakeholders and RHQ -
Prepare for an IMPLAN and budget proposal to be presented to POC -
Account all special investigation activities funded -
Submit report to POC and RHQ -
Criteria: Sustained Sustained reporting
Rating
5 4 3 2 1
Document
Review:
Updated # of updated
Performance 0.90- 0.70- 0.4-
Performance Performance 1-0.91 0.2-0
Indicator Profiles 0.71 0.41 0.21
Indicator Profile profile vs # of
Performance
Indicator
SAMPLE COMPUTATION
Element : Regular Monitoring, Review and Reporting of Strategy
Factor : Regular / continuous refresh based on learning and
feedback
Criteria : Sustained reporting
Performance Indicator with Performance Indicators Profile
CRIME PREVENTION
Nr. Of community awareness Activities initiated Ok
Number of sectoral groups organized/ mobilized (BPATs members organized & force multipliers) Ok
Number of participating respondents(FBSkype/OfficeTwitter) Ok
Number accounted Renewed firearms Ok
Number of accounted Unregistered firearms Ok
Number of functional LACAP Ok
Number of target hardening measures conducted Ok
Percentage reduction in crimes involving foreign and domestic tourists Ok
Number of police stations fully utilizing PIPS Ok
Reduction in crime volume Ok
a, Combat operations Ok
b. Combat security patrol Ok
Number of police stations using COMSTAT for crime prevention Ok
Number of Wanted persons arrested Ok
Increase in number of opns against Illegal drugs Ok
Increase in number of opns against Illegal gambling Ok
Increase in number of opns against No Plate no Travel Ok
Increase in number of opns against Illegal Logging Ok
Increase in number of opns against Illegal Fishing Ok
Number of organized and utilized BINs Ok
Number of criminal cases filed against threat groups (CNN, OCG) Ok
Number of threat groups members convicted (CNN,OCG) Ok
Performance Indicator with Performance Indicators Profile
CRIME SOLUTION
Number of trained investigators Ok
% of investigative positions filled up with trained/certified investigations Ok
Number of mins on response time (for every 5-10kms) Ok
a. WCPC Ok
Number of Trained investigators handling in: b. Crimes against persons and property Ok
c. Traffic accidents Ok
Nr of investigators rewarded Ok
Nr of investigators punished Ok
No. of seminars Or Conferences Conducted for investigators Ok
Number of Units using Web-based System Ok
Number of cases filed in court (drug-related and heinous crimes) Ok
Improved Crime solution Efficiency (CSE) Ok
Improved Crime Clearance Efficiency (CCE) Ok
Number of investigative infrastructure/equipment identified/accounted Ok
Percentage filled-up IIE Ok
a. IT complaint Stations Ok
Percentage of:
b. CT complaint Stations Ok
Number of linkages established Ok
Number of community/ stakeholders support generated Ok
Number of investigative activities funded Ok
Number of special investigation supported Ok
Criteria: Sustained monitoring
Rating
5 4 3 2 1
Document
Percentage of
Review:
Performance Officially
1 - 0.90 0.70 0.4
Indicator with transmitted OR 0.2 - 0
No of PI with OR 0.91 -0.71 -0.41 -0.21
Complete OR Matrix
Matrix vs total No
Matrix
of PI
Performance Indicator with Operations Review Matrix
CRIME PREVENTION
Nr. Of community awareness Activities initiated ok
Number of sectoral groups organized/ mobilized (BPATs members organized & force multipliers) ok
Number of participating respondents(FBSkype/OfficeTwitter) ok
Number accounted Renewed firearms Ok
Number of accounted Unregistered firearms ok
Number of functional LACAP ok
Number of target hardening measures conducted ok
Percentage reduction in crimes involving foreign and domestic tourists ok
Number of police stations fully utilizing PIPS ok
Reduction in crime volume ok
a, Combat operations ok
b. Combat security patrol ok
Number of police stations using COMSTAT for crime prevention ok
Number of Wanted persons arrested ok
Increase in number of opns against Illegal drugs ok
Increase in number of opns against Illegal gambling ok
Increase in number of opns against No Plate no Travel ok
Increase in number of opns against Illegal Logging ok
Increase in number of opns against Illegal Fishing ok
Number of organized and utilized BINs ok
Number of criminal cases filed against threat groups (CNN, OCG) ok
Number of threat groups members convicted (CNN,OCG) ok
Performance Indicator with Operations Review Matrix
CRIME SOLUTION
Number of trained investigators ok
% of investigative positions filled up with trained/certified investigations ok
Number of mins on response time (for every 5-10kms) ok
a. WCPC ok
Number of Trained investigators handling in: b. Crimes against persons and property ok
c. Traffic accidents ok
Nr of investigators rewarded ok
Nr of investigators punished ok
No. of seminars Or Conferences Conducted for investigators ok
Number of Units using Web-based System ok
Number of cases filed in court (drug-related and heinous crimes) ok
Improved Crime solution Efficiency (CSE) ok
Improved Crime Clearance Efficiency (CCE) ok
Number of investigative infrastructure/equipment identified/accounted ok
Percentage filled-up IIE ok
a. IT complaint Stations ok
Percentage of:
b. CT complaint Stations ok
Number of linkages established ok
Number of community/ stakeholders support generated ok
Number of investigative activities funded ok
Number of special investigation supported ok
Rating
5 4 3 2 1
Document
Review:
# of Key
Officially
No of identified key Success Factors 0.90- 0.70- 0.4-
transmitted OR 1-0.91 0.2-0
success factors = # of 0.71 0.41 0.21
Matrix
Performance
Indicator with
Accomplished
Targets
Key Success Factor Identified
Accomplish
Performance Indicator Target Key Success Factor
ment
CRIME PREVENTION
Financial support from the LGU
Nr. Of community awareness Activities initiated 1,790 3616
Frequent conduct community-based activities
All Police Stations to include the Provincial
Number of participating respondents(FBSkype/OfficeTwitter) 7,000 9027 Headquarters have internet connection with active
monitoring on social media account/s
Number accounted Renewed firearms 50 52 New policy of firearms registration/renewal
Conduct of Patrol 101
Conduct of security survey inspections to vital

Number of target hardening measures conducted 1,200 1,586 installations
Fortification of camp defense
Percentage reduction in crimes involving foreign and domestic tourists 100% 100% Less number tourist spots
Number of police stations fully utilizing PIPS 11 11 All units including PPSC are fully implementing PIPS
Reduction in crime volume 1100 783 More traffic accidents recorded
Availability of computers in every station that are
Number of police stations using COMSTAT for crime prevention 11 11 used for monitoring of crimes
Increase in number of opns against Illegal drugs 80 153 Intensified conduct of operations on illegal drugs
Adherence to the directive of no plate no travel
Increase in number of opns against No Plate no Travel 700 2168
Sustained conduct of checkpoints/oplan sita
Intensified monitoring on
Increase in number of opns against Illegal Fishing 4 8
coastal areas
Key Success Factor Identified
Performance Indicator Target Accomplishment Key Success factor
CRIME SOLUTION
Sending personnel to investigation
courses
Number of trained investigators 60 71
Availability of CIC
Trained investigators were assigned in
% of investigative positions filled up with trained/certified investigations 100% 100% investigation section
Conduct of response time exercise
Number of mins on response time (for every 7-10kms) 10mins 10mins
Properly maintained patrol vehicles
Number of Trained investigators handling in: Traffic accidents 7 11 More trained traffic investigators
Issuance of commendation to deserving
Nr of investigators rewarded 71 71 investigators
Support from LGUs
No. of seminars Or Conferences Conducted for investigators 5 8
Utilization of MOOE
Existence and implementation of E-
Number of Units using Web-based System 12 12 Projects
Investigators are persistently conducting
follow up on cases filed
Number of cases filed in court (drug-related and heinous crimes) 95 157
More recorded filed cases on drugs and
other heinous crimes
Adherence to POP and other procedures
Improved Crime Solution Efficiency (CSE) 48% 50.06% in filing of cases
a. IT complaint Stations 100% 100% Available computer literate personnel
Percentage of:
b. CT complaint Stations 100% 100% Available computer literate personnel
Number of investigative activities funded 135 176 Supportive stakeholders
FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS
• 23 out of the 43 Performance Indicator

have attained or surpassed their targets. All
23 Performance Indicator have identified
KSF.
• KSF are reasons or factors that contributed
to the attainment of targets. It should be
• Evaluate if the KSFs are related to the
noted that KSF, if sustained, can be a good
Activities.
source of Emerging or Developing Best
Practices.
• Moreover, the KSF will also serve to
validate if the implementation of the
activities if it’s still responsive to the
Performance Indicator.
Rating
5 4 3 2 1
Document
Review:
AAR; Unit
*Officially
Nr of resolved gaps Dashboard ;
transmitted *OR
against the nr of After- OR
Matrix
identified gaps Reports
*Minutes of
*constraints 0.90- 0.70- 0.4-
Operations 1-0.91 0.2-0
*limitations # of Gaps 0.71 0.41 0.21
Review
*lessons learned resolved vs total
*After- Activity
# of Gaps
Reports
identified.
NOTE: # of Gaps
identified = # of
PI with unmet
Targets
Identified Gaps with intervention
Accomplish
Performance Indicator Target Identified Gaps
ment
CRIME PREVENTION
Number of sectoral groups
organized/ mobilized (BPATs 5,30 Less focus regarding the organization and Conduct additional activities for the organization and
3,695
members organized & force 0 mobilization of BPATs mobilization of BPATs
multipliers)
Number of accounted Unregistered firearms was declared lost by the Sustain and intensify Police operations (raids,
Unregistered firearms
64 47 holder checkpoint)
Cabadbaran City Police station has no LACAP Endorse the generated LACAP to the Local Chief
Number of functional LACAP 11 10 approved by the Local Chief Executive Executive for approval
unexpected numerous activities More personnel to be assigned at PPSC
a, Combat
operations
36 25
Number of ISO Limited number of PNP personnel Additional firepower capability
related activities b. Combat
conducted: 4,20 Sustain the conduct of CSP
security 3990 Unexpected numerous activities
patrol
0
Number of Wanted persons
arrested
240 206 Inadequate financial resources Additional financial resources
Increase in number of opns
against Illegal gambling
60 49 Intensified illegal gambling operation Sustain the conduct of illegal gambling operations
Increase in number of opns Strong implementation of EO 23 that resulted in Sustain police operation on illegal logging and
against Illegal Logging
21 16
decreased illegal logging activities implementation of EO 23
Organize more BINs
Number of organized and utilized
BINs
800 450 Less focus on organizing BINs
Ensure active BINs in every barangay
Number of criminal cases filed Less aggressive case build up efforts against threat -Ensure active BINs in every barangay
groups -Intensify intel monitoring
against threat groups (CNN, 37 2 -Monitor filed cases
OCG) Fewer Active BINs and BPATs -Intensify case build up
Number of threat groups Usually cases against threat groups like CNN were
members convicted (CNN,OCG)
3 0 dismissed Conduct competency training to all investigators
Identified Gaps
Accomplish
Performance Indicator Target Identified Gaps
ment
CRIME SOLUTION
Lack of trained investigators handling
a. WCPC 25 24 WCPC
Send more personnel to CIC
Number of
Trained b. Crimes
investigators against 45 44
Lack of trained investigators handling Send more personnel to CIC
handling in: persons and CAPP
property
Adherence to POP and other procedures
Improved Crime Clearance in filing of cases
Efficiency (CCE)
60% 56.58% less tracking of filed cases
Follow up filed cases
Nr of investigators punished 4 1 Filing of cases against erring personnel
Number of investigative Procure additional investigative
Inadequate investigative infrastructure
infrastructure/equipment 34 33 in police stations
equipment
identified/accounted
Percentage filled-up IIE 65% 55% Lack of funds Request fund support
Establish more linkages
Number of linkages Less established linkages with the
established
215 113 stakeholders
Add more activities
Number of community/ Maintain the harmonious relationship
stakeholders support 74 64 Less focus in organizing linkages and coordination with stakeholders
generated
Number of special Inadequate fund support generated Maintain the harmonious relationship
investigation supported
17 12 from stakeholder and coordination with stakeholders
Criteria: Sustained assessment
Rating
5 4 3 2 1
Document
Review:
The unit must

Attainment of *Accomplishment
declare at least 1
Breakthrough Reports Yes - - - No
Performance
Results *Unit Scorecard
Indicator that has
accomplished
Breakthrough
Results
Rating
5 4 3 2 1
# of Performance
*Accomplishment
Attainment of Indicator that met 0.90- 0.70- 0.4-
Reports 1-0.91 0.2-0
targets the target vs. total 0.71 0.41 0.21
*Unit Dashboard
nr of PI
Attainment of Targets
Performance Indicator Target Accomplishment
CRIME PREVENTION
Nr. Of community awareness Activities initiated 1,790 3616
Number of participating respondents(FBSkype/OfficeTwitter) 7,000 9027
Number accounted Renewed firearms 50 52
Number of target hardening measures conducted 1,200 1,586
Percentage reduction in crimes involving foreign and domestic tourists 100% 100%
Number of police stations fully utilizing PIPS 11 11
Reduction in crime volume 1100 783
Number of police stations using COMSTAT for crime prevention 11 11
Increase in number of opns against Illegal drugs 80 153
Increase in number of opns against No Plate no Travel 700 2168
Increase in number of opns against Illegal Fishing 4 8

Attainment of Targets
Performance Indicator Target Accomplishment
CRIME SOLUTION
Number of trained investigators 60 71
% of investigative positions filled up with trained/certified investigations 100% 100%
Number of mins on response time (for every 7-10kms) 10mins 10mins
Number of Trained investigators handling in: Traffic accidents 7 11
Nr of investigators rewarded 71 71
No. of seminars Or Conferences Conducted for investigators 8 5
Number of Units using Web-based System 12 12
Number of cases filed in court (drug-related and heinous crimes) 95 157
Improved Crime solution Efficiency (CSE) 48% 50.06%
a. IT complaint Stations 100% 100%

Percentage of:
b. CT complaint Stations 100% 100%
Number of investigative activities funded 135 176

Rating
5 4 3 2 1
Nr of lag
*Accomplishment # of PI that met
Performance 0.90- 0.70- 0.4-
Reports the target vs. total 1-0.91 0.2-0
Indicator (PI) with 0.71 0.41 0.21
*Unit Dashboard nr of PI
attained targets
Rating
5 4 3 2 1
*Officially
transmitted AARs *Document
Presence of Any *Attendance Review
Member of the Sheets *Interview of Yes - - - No
Command Group *Minutes of the Command Group
Meeting Member/s
Action Photos
Rating
5 4 3 2 1
*Officially
transmitted AARs
*Document
Presence of *Attendance
Review
Advisory Council Sheets Yes - - - No
*Interview of AC
Member/s *Minutes of the
Member/s
Meeting
Action Photos
SUBMISSION STATUS OF AFTER- OR REPORTS FOR CY 2015
DATE CONDUCTED Presence of AC Member
January 13-Feb-15 None
February 5-Mar-15 None
March -
April -
May -
June 2-July-15 None
July 14-Aug-15 None
August 7-Sept-15 None
September 15-Oct-15 None
October -
November -
December -
FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS
All OR for CY 2015 were not attended by any Ensure the participation of at least one (1)
member of the AC. member of the AC during conduct of OR.
STRATEGY REVIEW: Efficient reporting and monitoring process
Criteria: Database for performance analysis
Rating
5 4 3 2 1
Presence of a *Interview with

Database or Electronic PSMU/IT
Records compilation of Personnel Yes - - - No
Management documents *Facility
System Walkthrough
FUNCTIONAL SCORECARD UP TO INDIVIDUAL LEVEL
FUNTIONAL SCORECARD: Full Alignment (showing cause-and-effect relationship
Criteria: Consistency
Rating
5 4 3 2 1
Alignment of
Subordinate Unit
Presence of at
Dashboard to
Unit Dashboard; least one
Mother Unit
Dashboard of objective in both Yes - - - No
Scorecard
Mother Unit Alignment =
'thematic'
a. Presence of
similar objectives
Rating
5 4 3 2 1
Alignment of
Subordinate Unit
Presence of at
Dashboard to
Unit Dashboard; least one PI in
Mother Unit
Dashboard of both Dashboard Yes - - - No
Dashboard
Mother Unit Alignment =
'thematic'
b. Presence of
similar PI
Rating
5 4 3 2 1
Alignment of
Subordinate Unit Presence of at
Dashboard to least one
Mother Unit Unit Dashboard; contributory
Dashboard Dashboard of target in both Yes - - - No
Mother Unit Dashboard
c. Presence of Alignment =
contributory 'thematic'
targets
Rating
5 4 3 2 1
Alignment of
Subordinate Unit Presence of at
Dashboard to least one Activitie
Unit Dashboard;
Mother Unit in both
Dashboard of Yes - - - No
Dashboard Dashboard
Mother Unit
Alignment =
d. Presence of 'thematic'
similar initiatives
Rating
5 4 3 2 1
Interview
Alignment of
(15 personnel)
Individual
Scorecard to Unit
*Unit Dashboard *In your ISC, what
Dashboard (% 100%- 94%- 84%- 64%- 34%-
*Individual are the activities
personnel 95% 85% 65% 35% 0%
Scorecard that contribute to
scorecard directly
the
contributory to unit
implementation of
scorecard)
Unit activitiess?
Rating
5 4 3 2 1
Interview
(15 personnel)
*Unit Dashboard
*Are the identified
Actual contribution *Individual
activities
in the Scorecard 100%- 94%- 84%- 64%- 34%-
contributory to
implementation of *AAR related to 95% 85% 65% 35% 0%
unit activities
Activities activities
performed/implem
implementation
ented?
(Same
respondents^^^)
Criteria: Updating (examination of objectives and targets)
Rating
5 4 3 2 1
Document
Review:
Officially
# of Perofmance
Submission of OR transmitted OR 1- 0.90- 0.70- 0.4-
Indicator with OR 0.2-0
Matrix Matrix 0.91 0.71 0.41 0.21
Matrix vs total # of
Performance
Indicator
FUNTIONAL SCORECARD: Link to performance evaluation system
Criteria: Provision for penalties and rewards
Rating
5 4 3 2 1
Interview
(15 personnel)
*What are the

Rewards/
rewards/
recognitions
Individual/Unit recognitions
(unit/individual) 100%- 94%- 84%- 64%- 34%-
Awards/ received due to
given due to the 95% 85% 65% 35% 0%
Recognitions the
attainment of
implementation/
targets
performance of
the identified
contributory
activities?
FUNTIONAL SCORECARD: Link to performance evaluation system
Criteria: Provision for penalties and rewards
Rating
5 4 3 2 1
Interview
(n personnel)
Linkage of IPER to 100%- 94%- 84%- 64%- 34%-
IPER
the ISC >>Admin Officer 95% 85% 65% 35% 0%
>>Supervising
Officer
CASCADING OF STRATEGY TO INDIVIDUAL LEVEL
CASCADING OF STRATEGY: Individual's understanding of contribution to the unit and org
Criteria: Extent of reach
Rating
5 4 3 2 1
* AARs to
cascading *Document
activities Review
* Quarterly
% of personnel COMPLAN report # personnel who 100%- 94%- 84%- 64%- 34%-
cascaded to * Individual attended 95% 85% 65% 35% 0%
scorecard cascading
* Quad media sessions vs total #
* Random personnel
interviews
Criteria: Common understanding
Rating
5 4 3 2 1
Document
Review:
Verify the
Individual
Scorecard of
% of personnel with
*Individual personnel to
aligned and 100%- 94%- 84%- 64%- 34%-
scorecard check if they
updated individual 95% 85% 65% 35% 0%
*Unit Dashboard contributed to the
scorecards
accomplishment
of Targets as
reflected in the
Unit Dashboard
.
Criteria: Common understanding
Rating
5 4 3 2 1
Interview
(15 personnel)
Individual
% level of
scorecard
understanding of *In your ISC, what
Random 100%- 94%- 84%- 64%- 34%-
contribution to are the activities
interviews 95% 85% 65% 35% 0%
unit’s personnel that contribute to
the
implementation of
Unit activities ?
CASCADING OF STRATEGY: Regularity of the cascading process
Criteria: Regular schedule
Rating
5 4 3 2 1
*Cascading AAR
submitted to
CPSM
*Quarterly
COMPLAN report
# of units/offices
submitted to
cascaded to vs
% of subordinate DPCR
total # of 100%- 94%- 84%- 64%- 34%-
units/offices *Attendance
units/offices 95% 85% 65% 35% 0%
cascaded to Sheets to
Cascading
Activities
*Photo
*Quadmedia
*Interviews
*AAR SR
CASCADING OF STRATEGY: Feedback
Criteria: Feedback mechanism to ensure updates (link to the functional scorecard)
Rating
5 4 3 2 1
*Documents
supporting
presence/existen *Document
Presence of
ce of feedback Review
Feedback Yes No
mechanism *Facility
Mechanism
*Use of tools and Walkthrough
technology
*Database
CASCADING OF STRATEGY: Commitment to targets
Criteria: Individual's personal monitoring of accomplishments vs targets
Rating
5 4 3 2 1
*Individual
*Personnel
% personnel who Scorecard 100%- 94%- 84%- 64%- 34%-
Interview
meet target *Random 95% 85% 65% 35% 0%
(n = 15)
interviews
CASCADING OF STRATEGY: Individual commitment
Criteria: Level of commitment
Rating
5 4 3 2 1
% level of * Individual
*Personnel
commitment to the scorecard 100%- 94%- 84%- 64%- 34%-
Interview
strategy in * Random 95% 85% 65% 35% 0%
(n = 15)
personnel interviews
TEAM
PNP
TRANSFORMATION…
Our Shared Commitment!!!
END OF PRESENTATION
END OF PRESENTATION

Lecture Analysis and Examination of Strategy Execution

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Lecture Analysis and Examination of Strategy Execution

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PNP P.A.T.R.O.L.

Audit Findings and Recommendation

Element 2- Analysis and Examination of Strategy

Conduct of security survey inspections to vital

• 23 out of the 43 Performance Indicator

The unit must

Nr. Of community awareness Activities initiated 1,790 3616

Number of participating respondents(FBSkype/OfficeTwitter) 7,000 9027

Number accounted Renewed firearms 50 52

Number of target hardening measures conducted 1,200 1,586

Number of police stations fully utilizing PIPS 11 11

Reduction in crime volume 1100 783

Number of police stations using COMSTAT for crime prevention 11 11

Increase in number of opns against Illegal drugs 80 153

Increase in number of opns against No Plate no Travel 700 2168

Increase in number of opns against Illegal Fishing 4 8

Number of trained investigators 60 71

% of investigative positions filled up with trained/certified investigations 100% 100%

Number of mins on response time (for every 7-10kms) 10mins 10mins

Number of Trained investigators handling in: Traffic accidents 7 11

No. of seminars Or Conferences Conducted for investigators 8 5

Number of Units using Web-based System 12 12

Number of cases filed in court (drug-related and heinous crimes) 95 157

Improved Crime solution Efficiency (CSE) 48% 50.06%

a. IT complaint Stations 100% 100%

Number of investigative activities funded 135 176

Presence of a *Interview with

*What are the

You might also like