Lecture VII A Mentalist Myth? — Part II Dr. Daniel Kaufman
College of Continuing Education & The Extended University
Missouri State University Lecture VII A Mentalist Myth? — Part II Gilbert Ryle Ordinary language philosophy Believed that philosophical problems arise out of confusions in language; typically the result of failing to attend to the many different ways in which words may be used. Philosophers tend to oversimplify things; to present things as black and white; as pro or con; as one way or another. Lecture VII A Mentalist Myth? — Part II Gilbert Ryle Mind/Body problem The problems that arise from a dualistic or mentalistic view of mind and body (i.e. mental-physical causation; problem of other minds, etc.). Lecture VII A Mentalist Myth? — Part II Gilbert Ryle Mind/Body problem Category mistake: a linguistic error, in which a person mistakes one type of word for another. Ryle thinks that all of the problems that comprise the mind/body problem are the result of category mistakes, which arise out of our use of mentalistic words. 1. University example 2. Military parade example (examples on pp. 16–17) Ryle argues that we commit a category mistake, with respect to mentalistic words. We think that they refer to mental entities and processes, when in fact they do not. (p. 16) Lecture VII A Mentalist Myth? — Part II Examples of common category mistakes, with respect to mentalistic words 1. John hits Bill. 2.John hates Bill. This assumption that if 'hits' refers to a physical action, then 'hates' must refer to a mental action is an example of what Ryle means, when he says that our belief in the existence of mental states is the result of a category mistake. Lecture VII A Mentalist Myth? — Part II • Behavioral • John kissed Jill. • John drank a glass of water. • John voted against George Bush [or any other president]. • Mentalistic • John loves Jill. • John is thirsty. • John thinks George Bush [or any other president] is the worst president ever. In each case, there is a temptation to think of sentences in the second group, along the same lines as the sentences in the first. The verbs in the first group denote physical activities of various kinds, while the verbs in the second refer to mental activities of various kinds. This leads us to imagine two separate realms: the realm of thought and the realm of behavior, which may construe dualistically or not. (p. 19) Lecture VII A Mentalist Myth? — Part II Ryle argues that the assumption that the sentences in the two groups are importantly similar is a mistake. * Specifically, it is the category mistake that gives rise to the mind/body problem and to all the further problems that follow from it. Lecture VII A Mentalist Myth? — Part II Ryle argues that the assumption that the sentences in the two groups are importantly similar is a mistake. Mentalistic words do not denote mental objects or events. Our mentalistic language is a shorthand for talking about how we are likely to behave. Lecture VII A Mentalist Myth? — Part II • Mentalistic • John loves Jill. • John is thirsty. • John thinks that George Bush [or any other president] is the worst president ever. • Dispositional • John is likely to kiss Jill, ask her out on a date, etc. • John will drink a glass of water or other refreshing liquid, if it is offered to him. • John is inclined to vote against George Bush [or any other president] campaign against him, protest him, etc. Lecture VII A Mentalist Myth? — Part II Next time: B. F. Skinner Things to think about while you read: • What does Skinner believe are the aims of science? • Why does Skinner believe we need a "Science of Man"? • What does Skinner think is unscientific about the mentalistic concept of a person?