Good Evening

1
 TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY (TAUNGGYI)
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
 
 

Comparison of Analysis and

  Design Result of Ten-
Storey R.C Building with  Special and Intermediate
Moment Resistant
 
 
Frame
 
 
Second Seminar
Graduation Thesis
 

Supervised By 20.7.2020 Presented By

Daw Swe Nwe Nwe Oo (Wednesday) Sai Aung Naing
6C-26

2
Outline of Presentation
 Introduction
 Aims and Objectives
 Scope
 Outlines of Thesis
 Implementation Plan
 Analyze and Design of Proposed Building by Using ETABS Software
 Compare Analysis and Design Result
 Future Plan
 References

3
Introduction
1. Reinforced concrete is a dominant structural material in
engineered construction.
2. The universal nature of reinforced concrete construction stems
from the wide availability of reinforcing bars and of the
constituents of concrete.
3. A moment resistant frame is a special type of frame that uses
rigid connections members.
4. This configuration is able to resist lateral and overturning forces
because of the bending moment and shear strength that inherent
in its members and the connecting joints.

Continued

4
3. SMRF and IMRF being emphasized in the research and a
detailed computer simulation of the different RCC structures in
zone 2 B with different R (Response Modification Factor) values
i.e., 5.5 and 8.5 given in UBC-1997 are used. R which is a
measure of ductility and over strength of the structures.
4. SMRF and IMRF are being consider in each moderate and high
seismic zone.
5. The proposed building include ten-storey and it located in
Taunggyi. The analysis and design of proposed building will be
done by ETABS software.

5
Aims and Objectives
1. To analysis and design of ten-storey R.C building.
2. To compare analysis and design result of ten-storey R.C building
with special and intermediate moment resistant frame.
3. To evaluate the different between SMRF and IMRF.

6
Scope

 Gravity loads are considered with ACI 318-14.

 Lateral loads are considered with UBC97.
 Super structure is only considered.

7
Outlines of Thesis
Chapter (1) Introduction
Chapter (2) Background Theory
Chapter (3) Data Preparation
Chapter (4) Analysis and Design for Proposed Building
Chapter (5) Discussion, Conclusion and
Recommendation

8
Implementation Plan

1.Study on Background Theory

2.Prepare drawing designs
3.Analyze and design of proposed building by using ETABS software
4.Compare the result of proposed building between SMRF and IMRF
5.Discussion, Conclusion and Recommendation

9
Analyze and Design of Proposed Building by Using ETABS
Software
1. Loading Based on ACI 318-14
2. Factored load combinations for determining required strength U in
the ACI Code
3. Define Static Load Case

10
Loading Based on ACI 318-14
Type of Loads
1. 4.5” brick wall 50 psf
2. Live load for residential 40 psf
3. Live load for stair 100 psf
4. Live load for roof 20 psf
5. Finishing load with tiles 20 psf
6. Suspended load 10 psf
7. Rain load 20 psf
8. Weight per unit volume for concrete 150 pcf

11
Factored load combinations for determining
required strength U in the ACI Code

12
Define Static Load Case

13
Define Lateral Loads
1. Earthquake
•• Location
  - Taunggyi
• Zone - IV
• Seismic zone Factor - 0.4
• Importance Factor -1
• Soil profile type - ( very dense soil and soft rock)
• Seismic source type -B
• Distance - 15km
• Time Period - 0.03 (method A)
• Over Strength Factor - 8.5 ( S.M.R.F) & 5.5 (I.M.R.F)

14
2. Wind

• Wind Speed - 60 mph

• Exposure type -B
• Important Factor -1
• Parapet Height - 3'9"

15
Applied Loads on Building
1.Live Load & Finished Load

16
2.Suspended, Rain & Wall Loads

17
3.Wind Pressure on Building in X and Y Direction

18
Compare Analysis and Design Result

19
Story Forces Due To Earthquake
S.M.R.F I.M.R.F Difference in %

Story X-Dir (Kip) Y-Dir(Kip) X-Dir(Kip) Y-Dir(Kip) X-Dir(Kip) Y-Dir(Kip)

ROOF TOP 11.648 11.648 20.361 20.361 0.427926 0.427926

ROOF 53.074 53.074 88.404 88.404 0.399643 0.399643

9TH FL 57.349 57.349 92.772 92.772 0.381829 0.381829

8TH FL 51.459 51.459 81.807 81.807 0.370971 0.370971

7TH FL 45.373 45.373 70.663 70.663 0.357896 0.357896

6TH FL 39.463 39.463 62.713 62.713 0.370737 0.370737

5TH FL 33.531 33.531 53.885 53.885 0.37773 0.37773

4TH FL 28.102 28.102 46.12 46.12 0.390676 0.390676

3RD FL 22.701 22.701 37.383 37.383 0.392745 0.392745

2ND FL 16.841 16.841 27.692 27.692 0.391846 0.391846

1ST FL 10.976 10.976 18.173 18.173 0.396027 0.396027

GROUND FL 2.178 2.178 3.886 3.886 0.439527 0.439527

20
Lateral Force to Story in X Direction Lateral Force to Story in Y Direction
(Kip) (Kip)
100 100
90 90
80 80
70 70
60 60
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
OP OF FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL O P O F FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL
T T
O FT RO 9T
H
8T
H
7T
H
6T
H
5T
H
4T
H
3 RD 2N
D
1S UND O FT RO 9T
H
8T
H
7T
H
6T
H
5T
H
4T
H
3R
D
2N
D
1S UND
RO O RO O
GR GR

I.M.R.F S.M.R.F I.M.R.F S.M.R.F

Figure 2. Comparison of Lateral Force to Story in X and Y Direction

21
 C1

B1
C2 B2

C3 B3

C4

B4

B5 C5

Figure 1. Comparison of analysis and design results of selected members

22
 Table 1. Comparison of Maximum Axial Force in Column
FLOOR Max Axial Force (Kip) Difference in %

C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5
I S I S I S I S I S
9TH
10.727 11.475 19.532 20.988 27.1 25.999 28.445 27.744 11.986 13.334
0.065185 0.069373 0.040627 0.024644 0.11246
8 TH
27.484 28.976 20.221 22.448 72.651 69.156 84.893 67.748 30.873 33.843
0.051491 0.099207 0.048107 0.20196 0.0962
7 TH
44.436 46.432 25.139 24.371 119.426 112.938 142.801 108.044 49.562 54.056
0.042988 0.03151 0.054327 0.243395 0.09067
6 TH
62.262 64.109 26.244 26.072 166.626 156.85 202.077 149.066 69.625 74.067
0.02881 0.0066 0.05867 0.262331 0.0638
5 TH
80.286 82.018 29.846 29.451 213.418 201.805 262.32 190.997 90.197 93.764
0.021117 0.01341 0.054414 0.271893 0.03955
4 TH
98.479 100.139 33.478 33.605 256.81 248.065 323.877 234.339 110.358 112.987
0.016577 0.003779 0.034052 0.276457 0.02382
3 RD
117.864 119.396 38.346 39.681 305.807 298.325 387.405 282.692 132.405 133.078
0.012831 0.033643 0.024466 0.270293 0.00508
2 ND
137.52 138.917 46.224 46.274 356.311 348.901 451.003 331.11 154.508 153.037
0.010056 0.001081 0.020796 0.265836 0.009521
1 ST
157.457 158.718 56.249 55.394 409.192 401.299 516.743 381.342 175.702 172.441
0.007945 0.01543 0.019289 0.262028 0.01856
GF
177.48 178.651 70.507 68.572 466.856 456.862 582.019 432.16 195.868 191.421
0.006555 0.02822 0.021407 0.257481 0.022704

23
Maximum Axial Force for C1 (Kip) Maximum Axial Force for C2 (Kip)

200 80
180 70
160
60
140
120 50

100 40
80 30
60
20
40
20 10

0 0
9TH 8TH 7TH 6TH 5TH 4TH 3RD 2ND 1ST GF 9TH 8TH 7TH 6TH 5TH 4TH 3RD 2ND 1ST GF

I.M.R.F S.M.R.F I.M.R.F S.M.R.F

Figure 2. Comparison of Maximum Axial Force for C1 and C2

24
Maximum Axial Force for C3 (Kip) Maximum Axial Force for C4 (Kip)

500 700
450
600
400
350 500

300
400
250
300
200
150 200
100
100
50
0 0
9TH 8TH 7TH 6TH 5TH 4TH 3RD 2ND 1ST GF 9TH 8TH 7TH 6TH 5TH 4TH 3RD 2ND 1ST GF

I.M.R.F S.M.R.F I.M.R.F S.M.R.F

Figure 2. Comparison of Maximum Axial Force for C3 and C4

25
Maximum Axial Force for C5 (Kip)

250

200

150

100

50

0
9TH 8TH 7TH 6TH 5TH 4TH 3RD 2ND 1ST GF

I.M.R.F S.M.R.F

Figure 2. Comparison of Maximum Axial Force for C5 26

 Table 2.Comparison of Maximum Shear in Column
FLOOR Max Shear V3 (Kip) Difference in %

C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5
I S I S I S I S I S
9TH
1.334 2.105 2.388 2.977 3.036 4.956 2.975 2.811 2.342 2.342
0.366271 0.19785 0.387409 0.055126 0.013237
8 TH
1.18 1.669 2.574 2.844 3.061 4.79 2.909 2.894 1.271 1.271
0.29299 0.094937 0.36096 0.005156 0.083399
7 TH
1.138 1.741 2.895 3.02 2.623 4.554 2.945 2.822 1.521 1.521
0.346353 0.041391 0.424023 0.041766 0.151874
6 TH
1.867 1.927 2.744 2.916 4.117 4.208 3.979 2.738 1.412 1.412
0.031136 0.058985 0.021625 0.311887 0.143768
5 TH
1.71 1.747 2.606 2.728 3.146 3.848 2.794 2.608 1.232 1.232
0.021179 0.044721 0.182432 0.066571 0.060877
4 TH
1.616 1.675 2.376 2.383 2.57 3.276 5.063 2.319 1.104 1.104
0.035224 0.002937 0.215507 0.541971 0.109601
3 RD
2.2 2.264 2.087 2.14 3.748 4.518 4.329 3.542 1.71 1.71
0.028269 0.024766 0.170429 0.181797 0.228655
2ND
1.968 1.991 1.832 1.91 2.97 3.491 3.659 2.896 1.381 1.381
0.011552 0.040838 0.149241 0.208527 0.230992
1 ST
2.118 2.72 1.591 1.67 2.476 3.087 4.434 4.158 1.175 1.175
0.221324 0.047305 0.197927 0.062246 0.208511
GF
1.344 1.376 0.612 0.641 1.863 1.959 1.857 1.83 1.005 1.005
0.023256 0.045242 0.049005 0.01454 0.152239

27
Maximum Shear V3 for C1 (Kip) Maximum Shear V3 for C2 (Kip)

3 3.5

2.5 3

2.5
2
2
1.5
1.5
1
1

0.5 0.5

0 0
9TH 8TH 7TH 6TH 5TH 4TH 3RD 2ND 1ST GF 9TH 8TH 7TH 6TH 5TH 4TH 3RD 2ND 1ST

I.M.R.F S.M.R.F I.M.R.F S.M.R.F

Figure 2. Comparison of Maximum Shear for C1 and C2

28
Maximum Shear V3 for C3 (Kip) Maximum Shear V3 for C4 (Kip)

6 6

5 5

4 4

3 3

2 2

1 1

0 0
9TH 8TH 7TH 6TH 5TH 4TH 3RD 2ND 1ST GF 9TH 8TH 7TH 6TH 5TH 4TH 3RD 2ND 1ST

I.M.R.F S.M.R.F I.M.R.F S.M.R.F

Figure 2. Comparison of Maximum Shear for C3 and C4

29
Maximum Shear V3 for C5 (Kip)

2.5

1.5

0.5

0
9TH 8TH 7TH 6TH 5TH 4TH 3RD 2ND 1ST GF

I.M.R.F S.M.R.F

Figure 2. Comparison of Maximum Shear for C5

30
 Table 3. Comparison of Maximum Moment M2 in Column
FLOOR Max Moment M2 (Kip-ft) Difference in %

C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5
I S I S I S I S I S
9TH
7.6131 11.5048 12.7977 12.7678 18.4934 29.4884 17.1563 17.1337 7.094 7.093
0.338268 0.002336 0.372858 0.001317 0.000141
8 TH
7.1407 10.1173 16.6866 12.4899 18.1327 28.5747 17.2876 17.3108 8.3923 7.3698
0.294209 0.251501 0.365428 0.00134 0.121838
7 TH
6.5573 10.4005 12.6144 9.1104 14.9557 26.94 19.0518 16.8986 8.7674 7.6192
0.369521 0.277778 0.444852 0.113018 0.130962
6 TH
10.1448 10.3423 10.0308 10.0088 23.6805 24.9022 23.0666 16.309 8.1487 7.1882
0.019096 0.002193 0.04906 0.29296 0.117872
5 TH
10.903 10.5187 8.9822 8.0277 17.8449 22.6887 18.2092 15.5135 7.3401 6.8817
0.035247 0.106266 0.21349 0.148041 0.062451
4TH
9.2372 8.9985 7.5122 6.6254 15.0568 18.8424 28.4971 13.4902 6.464 5.5955
0.025841 0.118048 0.200909 0.526611 0.13436
3 RD
12.6206 12.3854 5.7114 3.304 21.306 25.5755 26.0588 20.5254 9.717 7.4184
0.018636 0.421508 0.166937 0.212343 0.236554
2 ND
11.7103 11.4093 4.223 1.4137 17.2555 20.3118 20.7131 16.803 8.1083 6.3036
0.025704 0.665238 0.150469 0.188774 0.222574
1 ST
12.8997 12.7196 2.5361 1.1579 14.2262 18.2492 26.2835 24.5187 6.7523 5.3157
0.013962 0.543433 0.220448 0.067145 0.212757
GF 6.2725 6.0137 1.1307 1.0663 7.184 8.5161 7.5467 6.7715 5.772 5.0902
0.041259 0.056956 0.156421 0.10272 0.118122

31
Maximum Moment M2 for C1 (Kip) Maximum Moment M2 for C2 (Kip)

14 18

16
12
14
10
12
8 10

6 8

6
4
4
2
2

0 0
9TH 8TH 7TH 6TH 5TH 4TH 3RD 2ND 1ST GF 9TH 8TH 7TH 6TH 5TH 4TH 3RD 2ND 1ST

I.M.R.F S.M.R.F I.M.R.F S.M.R.F

Figure 2. Comparison of Moment M2 for C1 and C2

32
Maximum Moment M2 for C3 (Kip) Maximum Moment M2 for C4 (Kip)

35 30

30 25

25
20
20
15
15
10
10

5 5

0 0
9TH 8TH 7TH 6TH 5TH 4TH 3RD 2ND 1ST GF 9TH 8TH 7TH 6TH 5TH 4TH 3RD 2ND 1ST

I.M.R.F S.M.R.F I.M.R.F S.M.R.F

Figure 2. Comparison of Moment M2 for C3 and C4

33
Maximum Moment M2 for C5 (Kip)

12

10

0
9TH 8TH 7TH 6TH 5TH 4TH 3RD 2ND 1ST GF

I.M.R.F S.M.R.F

Figure 2. Comparison of Moment M2 for C5

34
 Table 4. Comparison of Maximum Moment M3 in Column
FLOOR Max Moment M3 (Kip-ft) Difference in %

C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5
I S I S I S I S I S
9TH
0.4212 1.1373 13.766 17.7337 9.8876 17.7027 10.8179 16.1026 7.7716 11.5644 0.441464 0.328189 0.327972
0.629649 0.223738
8TH
1.5399 1.9029 16.1901 16.9071 10.2755 17.6665 10.873 15.4648 7.696 10.6795 0.418362 0.296919 0.279367
0.190761 0.042408
7TH
1.4446 2.2237 17.2613 17.9687 9.1261 17.7268 9.4687 15.3119 6.6451 10.323 0.485181 0.381612 0.356282
0.350362 0.039368
6TH
2.798 2.9 16.3399 16.9995 16.2306 17.4664 16.5234 14.8151 10.5398 9.7268 0.070753 -0.11531 -0.08358
0.035172 0.038801
5TH
3.3685 3.8085 15.4752 15.9838 14.2804 16.9747 11.4067 14.1169 9.645 9.0776 0.158724 0.191983 -0.06251
0.115531 0.03182
4TH
3.4082 3.7746 13.9471 14.8238 12.0202 14.646 24.1524 11.7803 7.9403 7.2562 0.179284 -1.05024 -0.09428
0.09707 0.059141
3RD
5.9084 6.2586 12.284 12.6468 17.668 21.7072 22.1838 16.9218 10.9119 9.4889 0.186077 -0.31096 -0.14996
0.055955 0.028687
2ND
6.2648 6.6189 10.7093 11.1796 15.6764 19.1579 18.032 12.3177 9.0158 7.61 0.181727 -0.46391 -0.18473
0.053498 0.042068
1ST
8.7254 9.0196 9.3522 9.82 13.6415 18.8608 25.263 16.9716 7.9344 7.4786 0.276727 -0.48855 -0.06095
0.032618 0.047637
GF 2.9114 2.994 2.3912 2.8904 6.3424 6.9145 6.1228 5.2395 3.2598 3.3156 0.082739 -0.16858 0.01683
0.027589 0.17271

35
Maximum Moment M3 for C1 (Kip) Maximum Moment M3 for C2 (Kip)

10 20
9 18
8 16
7 14
6 12
5 10
4 8
3 6
2 4
1 2
0 0
9TH 8TH 7TH 6TH 5TH 4TH 3RD 2ND 1ST GF 9TH 8TH 7TH 6TH 5TH 4TH 3RD 2ND 1ST

I.M.R.F S.M.R.F I.M.R.F S.M.R.F

Figure 2. Comparison of Moment M3 for C1 and C2

36
Maximum Moment M3 for C3 (Kip) Maximum Moment M3 for C4 (Kip)

25 30

25
20

20
15
15
10
10

5
5

0 0
9TH 8TH 7TH 6TH 5TH 4TH 3RD 2ND 1ST GF 9TH 8TH 7TH 6TH 5TH 4TH 3RD 2ND 1ST

I.M.R.F S.M.R.F I.M.R.F S.M.R.F

Figure 2. Comparison of Moment M3 for C3 and C4

37
Maximum Moment M3 for C5 (Kip)

14

12

10

0
9TH 8TH 7TH 6TH 5TH 4TH 3RD 2ND 1ST GF

I.M.R.F S.M.R.F

Figure 2. Comparison of Moment M3 for C5

38
 Table 5. Comparison of Maximum Shear in Beam
FLOOR Max Shear V2 (Kip) Difference in %

B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5
I S I S I S I S I S
ROOF 5.546 5.459 11.455 15.494 6.229 8.811 1.202 1.648 3.183 4.548 -0.01594 0.260682 0.293043 0.270631 0.300132

9TH
8.138 8.41 10.363 8.455 11.618 16.017 2.747 1.887 5.226 7.768 0.032342 -0.22567 0.274646 -0.45575 0.32724

8TH
7.756 8.227 9.545 8.055 12.022 16.251 3.043 1.984 6.345 8.023 0.057251 -0.18498 0.26023 -0.53377 0.209149

7TH
7.616 8.148 6.58 8.53 12.596 14.833 2.813 2.26 8.242 8.135 0.065292 0.228605 0.150812 -0.24469 -0.01315

6TH
7.344 8.11 6.072 7.799 13.186 15.01 2.762 2.696 10.016 8.11 0.094451 0.221439 0.121519 -0.02448 -0.23502

5TH
6.906 8.037 5.641 7.264 13.17 15.183 1.295 3.381 10.59 7.916 0.140724 0.223431 0.132582 0.616977 -0.3378

4TH
12.495 9.571 4.791 4.7 13.961 15.561 0.624 3.838 10.8 8.113 -0.30551 -0.01936 0.102821 0.837415 -0.3312

3RD
13.139 9.771 3.829 4.09 14.72 15.869 0.362 3.647 11.942 8.177 -0.34469 0.063814 0.072405 0.90074 -0.46044

2ND
13.567 9.986 4.993 3.532 14.926 15.888 0.195 2.742 12.041 7.807 -0.3586 -0.41365 0.060549 0.928884 -0.54233

1ST
14.01 10.251 8.504 2.868 15.648 15.97 0.366 1.648 12.099 7.488 -0.3667 -1.96513 0.020163 0.777913 -0.61579

GF 6.364 3.207 5.066 3.646 4.484 2.284 4.513 1.79 12.184 3.171
-0.98441 -0.38947 -0.96322 -1.52123 -2.84232

39
Maximum Shear V2 for B1 (Kip) Maximum Shear V2 for B2 (Kip)

16 20

14 18
16
12
14
10 12
8 10

6 8
6
4
4
2 2
0 0
ROOF 9TH 8TH 7TH 6TH 5TH 4TH 3RD 2ND 1ST GF 9TH 8TH 7TH 6TH 5TH 4TH 3RD 2ND 1ST

I.M.R.F S.M.R.F I.M.R.F S.M.R.F

Figure 2. Comparison of Shear V2 for B1 and B2

40
Maximum Shear V2 for B3 (Kip) Maximum Shear V2 for B4 (Kip)

18 4.5

16 4

14 3.5

12 3

10 2.5

8 2

6 1.5

4 1

2 0.5

0 0
ROOF 9TH 8TH 7TH 6TH 5TH 4TH 3RD 2ND 1ST GF 9TH 8TH 7TH 6TH 5TH 4TH 3RD 2ND 1ST

I.M.R.F S.M.R.F I.M.R.F S.M.R.F

Figure 2. Comparison of Shear V2 for B3 and B4

41
Maximum Shear V2 for B5 (Kip)

14

12

10

0
ROOF 9TH 8TH 7TH 6TH 5TH 4TH 3RD 2ND 1ST GF

I.M.R.F S.M.R.F

Figure 2. Comparison of Shear V2 for B5

42
 Table 6. Comparison of Maximum Torsion in Beam
FLOOR Max Torsion (Kip-ft) Difference in %

B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5
I S I S I S I S I S
ROOF 0.8096 0.4476 5.9831 5.1701 3.6577 7.8843 2.4872 0.9024 3.4706 2.9475 -0.80876 -0.15725 0.536078 -1.75621 -0.17747

9TH
3.3513 2.5129 6.6458 8.4073 6.2531 13.3989 3.1846 0.833 3.0646 3.8359 -0.33364 0.20952 0.533312 -2.82305 0.201074

8TH
2.7203 2.3499 7.2983 8.2307 5.783 12.9268 1.4259 0.828 3.1788 3.3338 -0.15762 0.113283 0.552635 -0.7221 0.046493

7TH
2.0679 2.0213 4.9756 8.9978 5.7413 9.136 0.5957 0.8172 2.7691 3.2813 -0.02305 0.44702 0.371574 0.271047 0.156097

6TH
1.5079 1.8746 4.4713 8.25 5.3883 8.5263 0.2957 0.7626 2.7093 3.1967 0.195615 0.458024 0.368038 0.612248 0.15247

5TH
1.1536 1.6883 3.9458 8.1271 3.9058 7.7475 1.7668 0.7015 3.1609 3.2137 0.316709 0.514489 0.495863 -1.5186 0.01643

4TH
0.5181 1.3389 3.2815 3.3762 3.5619 7.4855 2.1405 0.4325 2.8708 3.0567 0.613041 0.028049 0.52416 -3.94913 0.060817

3RD
0.1563 1.06 2.6512 2.1681 3.1786 7.1536 2.1946 0.2559 2.5885 2.933 0.852547 -0.22282 0.555664 -7.57601 0.117457

2ND
0.1264 0.8641 1.9722 2.0094 2.3313 5.9904 2.9281 0.2856 2.5348 2.8813 0.853721 0.018513 0.610827 -9.25245 0.120258

1ST
0.1242 0.7359 1.4054 1.7399 1.8765 5.0727 3.3802 0.3209 1.9795 2.0205 0.831227 0.192252 0.630079 -9.5335 0.020292

GF 1.4278 0.1019 0.8938 1.7004 1.295 2.168 2.8185 0.0493 0.9401 1.3877
-13.0118 0.474359 0.402675 -56.1704 0.322548

43
Maximum Torsion for B1 (Kip) Maximum Torsion for B2 (Kip)

4 10

3.5 9
8
3
7
2.5 6
2 5

1.5 4
3
1
2
0.5 1
0 0
ROOF 9TH 8TH 7TH 6TH 5TH 4TH 3RD 2ND 1ST GF ROOF 9TH 8TH 7TH 6TH 5TH 4TH 3RD 2ND

I.M.R.F S.M.R.F I.M.R.F S.M.R.F

Figure 2. Comparison of Torsion for B1 and B2

44
Maximum Torsion for B3 (Kip) Maximum Torsion for B4 (Kip)

4 3.5

3.5 3

3
2.5
2.5
2
2
1.5
1.5
1
1

0.5 0.5

0 0
ROOF 9TH 8TH 7TH 6TH 5TH 4TH 3RD 2ND 1ST GF ROOF 9TH 8TH 7TH 6TH 5TH 4TH 3RD 2ND

I.M.R.F S.M.R.F I.M.R.F S.M.R.F

Figure 2. Comparison of Torsion for B3 and B4

45
Maximum Torsion for B5 (Kip)

16

14

12

10

0
ROOF 9TH 8TH 7TH 6TH 5TH 4TH 3RD 2ND 1ST GF

I.M.R.F S.M.R.F

Figure 2. Comparison of Torsion for B5

46
 Table 7. Comparison of Maximum Moment M3 in Beam
FLOOR Max Moment M3 (Kip-ft) Difference in %

B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5
I S I S I S I S I S
ROOF 13.0435 10.2848 36.8312 29.7765 21.0033 32.6354 37.1298 23.9081 10.8549 6.798 -0.26823 -0.23692 0.356426 -0.55302 -0.59678

9TH
15.7967 13.1848 18.5281 16.2427 38.8187 53.6213 39.5643 27.5249 18.9059 13.3632 -0.1981 -0.1407 0.276058 -0.4374 -0.41477

8TH
16.7647 13.2525 18.6462 16.0335 38.7295 53.3461 38.6939 27.4571 18.262 14.5516 -0.26502 -0.16295 0.273996 -0.40925 -0.25498

7TH
16.6694 13.4227 22.5386 19.5684 37.5394 43.4342 35.6658 26.0273 18.3688 15.1652 -0.24188 -0.15179 0.135718 -0.37032 -0.21125

6TH
16.4303 13.6907 21.0197 18.1665 36.6422 43.3514 34.0828 24.0776 26.9996 15.2051 -0.20011 -0.15706 0.154763 -0.41554 -0.77569

5TH
17.6766 14.0781 20.1803 17.1006 35.1919 43.368 31.6137 21.0907 30.1509 14.5283 -0.25561 -0.18009 0.188528 -0.49894 -1.07532

4TH
17.9227 13.9943 12.2437 7.6987 34.6766 42.0709 31.2909 17.2517 33.6131 15.193 -0.28071 -0.59036 0.175758 -0.81379 -1.21241

3RD
18.2899 13.8864 11.8831 7.1172 34.3325 40.9231 38.5711 17.4699 39.4961 15.7486 -0.31711 -0.66963 0.161048 -1.20786 -1.50791

2ND
19.1621 14.1508 11.0377 6.1376 34.3724 40.6289 36.6618 16.4699 40.1281 14.0915 -0.35414 -0.79837 0.153991 -1.22599 -1.84768

1ST
19.7475 14.7225 10.7484 8.5077 34.5046 41.0422 36.0861 15.6425 38.8736 12.5141 -0.34131 -0.26337 0.15929 -1.30693 -2.10638

GF 20.2151 15.4804 9.9887 6.6133 18.9913 21.688 23.9768 12.0155 57.2592 19.922
-0.30585 -0.5104 0.124341 -0.99549 -1.87417

47
Maximum Moment M3 for B1 (Kip) Maximum Moment M3 for B2 (Kip)

25 40

35
20
30

15 25

20
10 15

10
5
5

0 0
ROOF 9TH 8TH 7TH 6TH 5TH 4TH 3RD 2ND 1ST GF ROOF 9TH 8TH 7TH 6TH 5TH 4TH 3RD 2ND

I.M.R.F S.M.R.F I.M.R.F S.M.R.F

Figure 2. Comparison of Moment M3 for B1 and B2

48
Maximum Moment M3 for B3 (Kip) Maximum Moment M3 for B4 (Kip)

60 40

35
50
30
40
25

30 20

15
20
10
10
5

0 0
ROOF 9TH 8TH 7TH 6TH 5TH 4TH 3RD 2ND 1ST GF ROOF 9TH 8TH 7TH 6TH 5TH 4TH 3RD 2ND

I.M.R.F S.M.R.F I.M.R.F S.M.R.F

Figure 2. Comparison of Moment M3 for B3 and B4

49
Maximum Moment M3 for B5 (Kip)

60

50

40

30

20

10

0
ROOF 9TH 8TH 7TH 6TH 5TH 4TH 3RD 2ND 1ST GF

I.M.R.F S.M.R.F

Figure 2. Comparison of Moment M3 for B5

50
 Table 8. Comparison of As required at C1
As required () at C1 Difference in (%)
I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
9TH 9TH
1 1.44 0.305556
(C10X10) (C12X12)
8TH 8TH
(C10X10) 1 (C12X12) 1.44 0.305556
77THTH 7 TH
7TH
1
1 1.44
1.44 0.305556
0.305556
(C10X10)
(C10X10) (C12X12)
(C12X12)
66TH
TH 6 TH
6TH
1.44
1.44 144
144 0.99
0.99
(C12X12)
(C12X12) (C12X12)
(C12X12)
55TH
TH 5 TH
5TH
1.44 1.44
1.44 00
(C12X12)
(C12X12) 1.44 (C12X12)
(C12X12)
4TH 4TH
4TH 1.96 4TH 1.44 -0.36111
(C14X14) 1.96 (C12X12) 1.44 -0.36111
(C14X14) (C12X12)
3RD 3RD
3RD 1.96 3RD 1.96 0
(C14X14) 1.96 (C14X14) 1.96 0
(C14X14) (C14X14)
2ND 2ND
2ND 1.96 2ND 1.96 0
(C14X14) 1.96 (C14X14) 1.96 0
(C14X14) (C14X14)
1ST 1ST
1ST 1.96 1ST 1.96 0
(C14X14) 1.96 (C14X14) 1.96 0
(C14X14) (C14X14)
GF GF
GF 1.96 GF 1.96 0
(C14X14) (C14X14)
(C14X14) 1.96 (C14X14) 1.96 0

51
 Table 9. Comparison of As required at C2
As required () at C2 Difference in (%)
I.M.R.F
I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
S.M.R.F
9 TH
9TH 9 TH
9TH
1.44
1.44 1.44
1.44 00
(C12X12)
(C12X12) (C12X12)
(C12X12)
8 TH
8TH 8 TH
8TH
1.44
1.44 1.44
1.44 00
(C12X12)
(C12X12) (C12X12)
(C12X12)
7TH 7TH
7TH 1.44 7TH 1.44 0
(C12X12) 1.44 (C12X12) 1.44 0
(C12X12) (C12X12)
6TH 6TH
6TH 1.44 6TH 1.44 0
(C12X12) 1.44 (C12X12) 1.44 0
(C12X12) (C12X12)
5TH 5TH
5TH 1.44 5TH 1.44 0
(C12X12) 1.44 (C12X12) 1.44 0
(C12X12) (C12X12)
4TH 4TH
4TH 1.44 4TH 1.44 0
(C12X12) 1.44 (C12X12) 1.44 0
(C12X12) (C12X12)
3RD 3RD
3RD 1.44 3RD 1.44 0
(C12X12) (C12X12)
(C12X12) 1.44 (C12X12) 1.44 0
2ND 2ND
2ND
(C12X12) 1.44 2ND
(C12X12) 1.44 0
(C12X12) 1.44 (C12X12) 1.44 0
1ST 1ST
1.44 1.44 0
(C12X12)
1ST (C12X12)
1ST
(C12X12) 1.44 (C12X12) 1.44 0
GF GF
1.44 1.44 0
(C12X12)
GF (C12X12)
GF
(C12X12) 1.44 (C12X12) 1.44 0

52
 Table 10. Comparison of As required at C3
As required () at C3 Difference in (%)

I.M.R.F S.M.R.F

9TH 9TH
(C10X10) 1.4298 (C12X12) 1.9466 0.265489

8TH 8TH
1 1.44 0.305556
(C10X10) (C12X12)
77TH
TH
7 TH
7TH
1
1 1.44
1.44 0.305556
0.305556
(C10X10)
(C10X10) (C12X12)
(C12X12)
66TH
TH 6 TH
6TH
1.44
1.44 144
144 0.99
0.99
(C12X12)
(C12X12) (C12X12)
(C12X12)
55TH
TH 5 TH
5TH
(C12X12) 1.6992 (C12X12) 1.8641 0.088461
(C12X12) 1.6992 (C12X12) 1.8641 0.088461
4TH 4TH
4TH 3.7429 4TH 3.3408 -0.12036
(C12X12) 3.7429 (C12X12) 3.3408 -0.12036
(C12X12) (C12X12)
3RD 3RD
3RD 2.459 3RD 2.199 -0.11824
(C14X14) 2.459 (C14X14) 2.199 -0.11824
(C14X14) (C14X14)
2ND 2ND
2ND
(C14X14) 5.1977 2ND
(C14X14) 4.8612 -0.06922
(C14X14) 5.1977 (C14X14) 4.8612 -0.06922
1ST 1ST
1ST 7.7479 1ST 7.4924 -0.0341
(C14X14) 7.7479 (C14X14) 7.4924 -0.0341
(C14X14) (C14X14)
GF GF
GF
(C16X16) 6.7553 GF
(C14X14) 10.3608 0.347994
(C16X16) 6.7553 (C14X14) 10.3608 0.347994

53
 Table 11. Comparison of As required at C4

As required () at C4 Difference in (%)

I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
9TH 9TH
1.2614 1.44 0.124028
(C10X10) (C12X12)
9TH 9TH
8TH
(C10X10) 1.2614 8TH
(C12X12) 1.44 0.124028
1 1.44 0.305556
(C10X10) (C12X12)
8TH 8TH
7TH 1 7TH 1.44 0.305556
(C10X10) 1.694 (C12X12) 1.44 -0.17639
(C10X10) (C12X12)
76THTH 7 TH
6TH
(C10X10) 1.694
1.8738 (C12X12) 1.44
144 -0.17639
0.986988
(C12X12) (C12X12)
65TH
TH 6 TH
5TH
(C12X12) 1.8738
4.0365 (C12X12) 144
2.6461 0.986988
-0.52545
(C12X12) (C12X12)
54TH 5
4TH
(C12X12) 2.56
4.0365 (C12X12) 5.5583
2.6461 0.539428
-0.52545
(C16X16)
34RD TH 34RD
TH
2.56
2.56 4.9462
5.5583 0.482431
0.539428
(C16X16) (C14X14)
(C12X12)
23ND RD 23ND
RD
5.8632
2.56 7.9282
4.9462 0.260463
0.482431
(C16X16)
(C16X16) (C14X14)
(C14X14)
1ST 1ST
2ND 4.5955 2ND 7.0492 0.348082
(C18X18) 5.8632 (C16X16) 7.9282 0.260463
(C16X16) (C14X14)
GF GF
1ST 8.0181 1ST 10.2741 0.219581
(C18X18) 4.5955 (C16X16) 7.0492 0.348082
(C18X18) (C16X16)
GF GF
(C18X18) 8.0181 (C16X16) 10.2741 0.219581

54
 Table 12. Comparison of As required at C5
As required () at C5 Difference in (%)
I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
9TH 1 9TH 1.44
0.305556
(C10X10) (C12X12)
9TH 1 9TH 1.44
8TH
(C10X10) 1 8TH
(C12X12) 1.44 0.305556
0.305556
(C10X10) (C12X12)
8TH 1 8TH 1.44
7TH 1 7TH 1.44 0.305556
(C10X10) (C12X12) 0.305556
(C10X10) (C12X12)
76THTH 1
1.44 7 TH
6TH 1.44
144
(C10X10) (C12X12) 0.305556
0.99
(C12X12) (C12X12)
65TH
TH 1.44
1.44 6 TH
5TH 144
1.44
(C12X12) (C12X12) 0.990
(C12X12) (C12X12)
54TH 1.44 5
4TH 1.44
(C12X12) (C12X12) 0

34RD TH 1.44 34RD

TH 1.96
1.44 0.2653060
(C12X12) (C14X14)
(C12X12)
23ND RD 1.96
1.44 23ND
RD 1.96
1.96
(C14X14)
(C12X12) (C14X14)
(C14X14) 0.2653060
1ST 1.96 1ST 1.96
2ND 1.96 2ND 1.96 0
(C14X14) (C14X14) 0
(C14X14) (C14X14)
GF 1.96 GF 1.96
1ST 1.96 1ST 1.96 0
(C14X14) (C14X14) 0
(C14X14) (C14X14)
GF 1.96 GF 1.96
(C14X14) (C14X14) 0

55
 Table 13. Comparison of As required at Beam B1

Type GF 1st F 2nd F 3rd F 4TH 5TH

I.M.R.F
I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
S.M.R.F I.M.R.F
I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
S.M.R.F I.M.R.F
I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
S.M.R.F I.M.R.F
I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
S.M.R.F I.M.R.F
I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
S.M.R.F I.M.R.F
I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
S.M.R.F
Beam
Beam
Size(in)
Size(in) B16X10 B14X10 B16X10 B14X10 B16X10 B14X10 B16X10 B14X10 B16X10 B14X10 B16X10 B14X10
B16X10 B14X10 B16X10 B14X10 B16X10 B14X10 B16X10 B14X10 B16X10 B14X10 B16X10 B14X10

Top
Steel () 0.725
0.725 0.341
0.341 1.0455
1.0455 0.655
0.655 0.725
0.725 0.625
0.625 0.8939
0.8939 0.625
0.625 0.7677
0.7677 0.625
0.625 0.725
0.725 0.625
0.625

Bottom 0.725
0.725
Steel ()
0.2089
0.2089 0.725
0.725 0.625
0.625 0.6454
0.6454 0.625
0.625 0.6003
0.6003 0.625
0.625 0.5877
0.5877 0.6208
0.6208 0.598
0.598 0.625
0.625

Total
Steel ()
1.45
1.45 0.5499
0.5499 1.7705
1.7705 1.28
1.28 1.3704
1.3704 1.25
1.25 1.4942
1.4942 1.25
1.25 1.3554
1.3554 1.2458
1.2458 1.323
1.323 1.25
1.25
Difference
Difference in
in
(%)
(%) 0.620758621
0.620758621 0.277040384
0.277040384 0.08785756
0.08785756 0.163431937
0.163431937 0.080861738
0.080861738 0.055177627
0.055177627

56
Continued….
6TH 7TH 8TH 9TH
Roof

I.M.R.F S.M.R.F I.M.R.F S.M.R.F I.M.R.F S.M.R.F I.M.R.F S.M.R.F I.M.R.F S.M.R.F

B16X10 B14X10 B16X10 B14X10 B16X10 B14X10 B16X10 B14X10 B16X10 B14X10

0.725 0.625 0.725 0.625 0.6974 0.625 0.6505 0.625 0.6121 0.5178

0.5817 0.6109 0.5782 0.5992 0.5966 0.5915 0.5795 0.5881 0.5807 0.5022

1.3067 1.2359 1.3032 1.2242 1.294 1.2165 1.23 1.2131 1.1928 1.02

0.054182291 0.060620012 0.059891808 0.013739837 0.144869215

57
 Table 13. Comparison of As required at Beam B2

4TH
GF 1st F 2nd F 3rd F 5TH
Type
I.M.R.F
I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
S.M.R.F I.M.R.F
I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
S.M.R.F I.M.R.F
I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
S.M.R.F I.M.R.F
I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
S.M.R.F I.M.R.F
I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
S.M.R.F I.M.R.F
I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
S.M.R.F

Beam
Beam B16X10
B16X10 B14X8
B14X8 B16X10
B16X10 B14X8
B14X8 B16X10
B16X10 B14X8
B14X8 B16X10
B16X10 B14X8
B14X8 B16X10
B16X10 B14X8
B14X8 B16X10
B16X10 B18x10
B18x10
Size(in)
Size(in)

Top
Steel () 0.2933
0.2933 0.186
0.186 0.3974
0.3974 0.2391
0.2391 0.4619
0.4619 0.2796
0.2796 0.5209
0.5209 0.3306
0.3306 0.558
0.558 0.3737
0.3737 0.5681
0.5681 0.3649
0.3649

Bottom
Steel () 0.2597
0.2597 0.1925
0.1925 0.2301
0.2301 0.1266
0.1266 0.2905
0.2905 0.1693
0.1693 0.3366
0.3366 0.2021
0.2021 0.3683
0.3683 0.2347
0.2347 0.3639
0.3639 0.2005
0.2005

Total
Steel () 0.553
0.553 0.3785
0.3785 0.6275
0.6275 0.3657
0.3657 0.7524
0.7524 0.4489
0.4489 0.8575
0.8575 0.5327
0.5327 0.9263
0.9263 0.6084
0.6084 0.932
0.932 0.5654
0.5654

Difference
Difference in
in 0.315551537
0.315551537 0.417211155
0.417211155 0.403375864
0.403375864 0.37877551
0.37877551 0.34319335
0.34319335 0.393347639
0.393347639
(%)
(%)

58
Continued….
6TH 7TH 8TH 9TH
Roof

I.M.R.F S.M.R.F I.M.R.F S.M.R.F I.M.R.F S.M.R.F I.M.R.F S.M.R.F I.M.R.F S.M.R.F

B16X10 B18x10 B16X10 B18x10 B16X10 B16X10 B16X10 B16X10 B16X10 B16X10

0.6104 0.388 0.6457 0.419 0.55 0.6072 0.725 0.6278 0.7323 0.7445

0.3544 0.2085 0.3524 0.224 0.3517 0.3361 0.3138 0.3499 0.7213 0.5965

0.9648 0.5965 0.9981 0.643 0.9017 0.9433 1.0388 0.9777 1.4536 1.341

0.381737148 0.355775974 -0.046135078 0.058817867 0.077462851

59
 Table 13. Comparison of As required at Beam B3

4TH
GF 1st F 2nd F 3rd F 5TH
Type
I.M.R.F
I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
S.M.R.F I.M.R.F
I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
S.M.R.F I.M.R.F
I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
S.M.R.F I.M.R.F
I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
S.M.R.F I.M.R.F
I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
S.M.R.F I.M.R.F
I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
S.M.R.F

Beam
Beam B16X10
B16X10 B18x10
B18x10 B16X10
B16X10 B18x10
B18x10 B16X10
B16X10 B18x10
B18x10 B16X10
B16X10 B18x10
B18x10 B16X10
B16X10 B18x10
B18x10 B16X10
B16X10 B18x10
B18x10
Size(in)
Size(in)

Top
Steel () 0.725
0.725 0.3778
0.3778 1.3632
1.3632 0.69
0.69 1.3041
1.3041 0.6801
0.6801 1.2773
1.2773 0.6744
0.6744 1.1588
1.1588 0.6357
0.6357 1.0791
1.0791 0.6209
0.6209

Bottom
Steel () 0.6615
0.6615 0.3069
0.3069 1.0613
1.0613 0.7241
0.7241 1.0518
1.0518 0.7131
0.7131 1.0472
1.0472 0.7175
0.7175 1.0393
1.0393 0.7221
0.7221 1.0562
1.0562 0.744
0.744

Total
Steel () 1.3865
1.3865 0.6847
0.6847 2.4245
2.4245 1.4141
1.4141 2.3559
2.3559 1.3932
1.3932 2.3245
2.3245 1.3919
1.3919 2.1981
2.1981 1.3578
1.3578 2.1353
2.1353 1.3649
1.3649

Difference
Difference in
in 0.506166607
0.506166607 0.416745721
0.416745721 0.408633643
0.408633643 0.40120456
0.40120456 0.3822847
0.3822847 0.360792395
0.360792395
(%)
(%)

60
Continued….
6TH 7TH 8TH 9TH
Roof

I.M.R.F S.M.R.F I.M.R.F S.M.R.F I.M.R.F S.M.R.F I.M.R.F S.M.R.F I.M.R.F S.M.R.F

B16X10 B18x10 B16X10 B18x10 B16X10 B20x12 B16X10 B20x12 B16X10 B20x12

1.0387 0.6131 0.9225 0.6048 0.9012 0.7165 0.8743 0.7064 0.6744 0.317

1.093 0.7406 1.0991 0.7394 1.1319 0.7972 1.1287 0.798 0.725 0.6641

2.1317 1.3537 2.0216 1.3442 2.0331 1.5137 2.003 1.5044 1.3994 0.9811

0.364966928 0.335081124 0.255471939 0.24892661 0.29891382

61
 Table 13. Comparison of As required at Beam B4

4TH
GF 1st F 2nd F 3rd F 5TH
Type
I.M.R.F
I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
S.M.R.F I.M.R.F
I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
S.M.R.F I.M.R.F
I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
S.M.R.F I.M.R.F
I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
S.M.R.F I.M.R.F
I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
S.M.R.F I.M.R.F
I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
S.M.R.F

Beam
Beam B16X10
B16X10 B14X8
B14X8 B18x12
B18x12 B14X8
B14X8 B18x12
B18x12 B14X8
B14X8 B18x12
B18x12 B14X8
B14X8 B16X10
B16X10 B14X8
B14X8 B16X10
B16X10 B14X8
B14X8
Size(in)
Size(in)

Top
Steel () 0.725
0.725 0.2455
0.2455 0.66
0.66 0.5
0.5 0.66
0.66 0.5
0.5 0.66
0.66 0.5
0.5 0.749
0.749 0.5
0.5 0.76
0.76 0.5894
0.5894

Bottom
Steel () 0.725
0.725 0.1941
0.1941 0.3291
0.3291 0.2828
0.2828 0.3502
0.3502 0.2946
0.2946 0.3521
0.3521 0.3196
0.3196 0.4882
0.4882 0.3146
0.3146 0.4975
0.4975 0.3832
0.3832

Total
Steel () 1.45
1.45 0.4396
0.4396 0.9891
0.9891 0.7828
0.7828 1.0102
1.0102 0.7946
0.7946 1.0121
1.0121 0.8196
0.8196 1.2372
1.2372 0.8146
0.8146 1.2575
1.2575 0.9726
0.9726

Difference
Difference in
in 0.696827586
0.696827586 0.208573451
0.208573451 0.213423085
0.213423085 0.190198597
0.190198597 0.341577756
0.341577756 0.226560636
0.226560636
(%)
(%)

62
Continued….
6TH 7TH 8TH 9TH
Roof

I.M.R.F S.M.R.F I.M.R.F S.M.R.F I.M.R.F S.M.R.F I.M.R.F S.M.R.F I.M.R.F S.M.R.F

B16X10 B14X8 B16X10 B16X10 B16X10 B14X8 B16X10 B14X8 B16X10 B14X8

0.8194 0.6781 0.8625 0.7367 0.9825 0.7731 1.0967 0.5 0.9978 0.6571

0.5332 0.4394 0.563 0.4762 0.6371 0.4988 0.7107 0.5 0.6317 0.4137

1.3526 1.1175 1.4255 1.2129 1.6196 1.2719 1.8074 1 1.6295 1.0708

0.173813396 0.149140652 0.214682638 0.446719044 0.34286591

63
 Table 13. Comparison of As required at Beam B5

4TH
GF 1st F 2nd F 3rd F 5TH
Type
I.M.R.F
I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
S.M.R.F I.M.R.F
I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
S.M.R.F I.M.R.F
I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
S.M.R.F I.M.R.F
I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
S.M.R.F I.M.R.F
I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
S.M.R.F I.M.R.F
I.M.R.F S.M.R.F
S.M.R.F

Beam
Beam B14X10
B14X10 B14X10
B14X10 B14X10
B14X10 B14X10
B14X10 B14X10
B14X10 B14X10
B14X10 B14X10
B14X10 B14X10
B14X10 B14X10
B14X10 B14X10
B14X10 B14X10
B14X10 B14X10
B14X10
Size(in)
Size(in)

Top
Steel () 1.7235
1.7235 0.3764
0.3764 1.1277
1.1277 0.5248
0.5248 1.1558
1.1558 0.4967
0.4967 1.1374
1.1374 0.5824
0.5824 0.9449
0.9449 0.5525
0.5525 0.8534
0.8534 0.558
0.558

Bottom
Steel () 1.5412
1.5412 0.1946
0.1946 0.625
0.625 0.3807
0.3807 0.625
0.625 0.3757
0.3757 0.625
0.625 0.3795
0.3795 0.6033
0.6033 0.3861
0.3861 0.5561
0.5561 0.397
0.397

Total
Steel () 3.2647
3.2647 0.571
0.571 1.7527
1.7527 0.9055
0.9055 1.7808
1.7808 0.8724
0.8724 1.7624
1.7624 0.9619
0.9619 1.5482
1.5482 0.9386
0.9386 1.4095
1.4095 0.955
0.955

Difference
Difference in
in 0.825098784
0.825098784 0.483368517
0.483368517 0.510107817
0.510107817 0.454210168
0.454210168 0.393747578
0.393747578 0.322454771
0.322454771
(%)
(%)

64
Continued….
6TH 7TH 8TH 9TH
Roof

I.M.R.F S.M.R.F I.M.R.F S.M.R.F I.M.R.F S.M.R.F I.M.R.F S.M.R.F I.M.R.F S.M.R.F

B14X10 B14X10 B14X10 B14X10 B14X10 B14X10 B14X10 B14X10 B14X10 B14X10

0.7574 0.5608 0.625 0.5596 0.5728 0.5545 0.625 0.5736 0.3802 0.2769

0.4935 0.3997 0.3727 0.4025 0.3874 0.4051 0.3828 0.4052 0.2707 0.2585

1.2509 0.9605 0.9977 0.9621 0.9602 0.9596 1.0078 0.9788 0.6509 0.5354

0.23215285 0.035682069 0.00062487 0.028775551 0.177446612

65
ACI provision for S.M.R.F
•Beam
 
• Clear span equal to at least 4d and width not less than 0.3h .
• Within a distance 2h of critical sections lap splices must be enclosed by hoops
or spirals with a maximum spacing of 1/4 of the effective depth or 4 in.
• The first hoop must be located not more than 2 in from the face of the
supporting member and the maximum spacing of the hoops must not exceed 1/4
of the effective depth, 6 times the diameter of the smallest longitudinal bar,
excluding skin reinforcement, or 6 in.
• To obtain ductile performance, the location of lap splices is limited. They may
not be used within joints, within a distance 2h of critical sections . Lap splices
must be enclosed by hoops or spirals with a maximum spacing of 1/4 of the
effective depth or 4 in.

66
• Stirrups with seismic hooks at both ends must be provided
throughout the member, with a maximum spacing of ½ of the
effective depth.

67
• 
Column
• In special moment frames have (1) a minimum cross-sectional
dimension of at least 12 in. (2) a ratio of the shortest cross-sectional
dimension to the perpendicular dimension of at least 0.4 .
• Lap splices must be designed for tension, are permitted only in the
center half of columns.
• ACI Code specifies the use of minimum transverse reinforcement
over length from each joint face and on both sides of any section
where flexural yielding is likely because of inelastic lateral
displacement of the frame. The length may not be less than (1) the
depth of the column, (2) 1/6 of the clear span of the member, or (3)
18 in.

68
• For
  regions outside of, when the minimum transverse reinforcement
defined above is not provided, the spacing of spiral or hoop
reinforcement may not exceed 6 times the diameter of the
longitudinal column bars or 6 in.
• The spacing of transverse reinforcement within may not exceed 1/4
of the minimum member dimension, 6 times the diameter of the
longitudinal bar, or

where is the maximum horizontal spacing of hoop

69
ACI provision for I.M.R.F
Beams
• Hoops are required at both ends of beams over a length equal to twice the
member depth. The first hoop must be placed within 2 in of the face of
the support.
• The maximum spacing in this region may not exceed 1/4 of the effective
depth, 8 times the diameter of the smallest longitudinal bar, 24 times the
stirrup diameter, or 12 in.
• The maximum stirrup spacing elsewhere in beams is one-half of the
effective depth.

70
•   columns
For
• The length must be greater than 1/6 of the column clear span, the
maximum cross-sectional dimension of the member, or 18 in.
• Within length ℓo from the joint face, the tie spacing may not exceed
8 times the diameter of the smallest longitudinal bar, 24 times the
diameter of the tie bar, 1/2 of the smallest cross-sectional dimension
of the column, or 12 in. The first tie must be located not more than
from the joint face.
• Outside of, the spacing of the transverse reinforcement must not
exceed or 24 in.
• There is no restriction on the location of longitudinal bar splices for
I.M.R.F. The splices may be located away from joints.

71
Discussion
• The study gives a comparison of IMRF and SMRF structure system under seismic
load . SMRF gives more safety to designers to design the structure and it is a little
bit cost effective to the builders who construct the tall and high rise buildings.

• In both system of analysis results of IMRF and SMRF . The lateral loads applied
on IMRF is more than SMRF. SMRF has less story drift than IMRF. So SMRF can
resist the seismic loads more than OMRF.

• The min steel area and spacing of the lateral ties at beam, column is different from
IMRF and SMRF. So that the lateral loads resistance is different.

72
Conclusion
All structural systems are not treated equal when response to earthquake-induced forces
is of concern. Aspects of structural configuration, symmetry, mass distribution, and vertical
regularity must be considered. The importance of strength, stiffness, and ductility in relation
to acceptable response must also be appreciated. While considering the lateral force
resisting systems we come up with so many options to have structural systems like Bearing
wall systems, Moment Resisting frames, Lateral Bracing systems, designing the moment
resisting concrete frame structures we have option to use IMRF, OMRF or SMRF. The basic
step in conceptual design is to find the best suitable framing system and than lateral load
resisting mechanism, while designing structures in the field mostly engineers face problem
about the decision of Response Modification Factor R which is a measure of ductility and
73
Continued….
over strength of the structures. It is used to find the base shear which is distributed on
different stories. SMRF and IMRF being emphasized in the research and a detailed
computer simulation of the different RCC structures with the different R values i.e., 5.5
and 8.5 given in UBC-1997 are used. Structures with different heights of stories, Plans and
No. of stories are modeled in software to analyze the structure. The conclusions are drawn
from the research for the approximation of the most suitable R values and to check the
reliability of the values given in UBC.

74
Recommendation

• Comparison of cost of ten-storey R.C building with special and intermediate

moment resistant frame should be carried out.
• Comparison of analysis and design of foundation results should be done.
 References
1. Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures 2nd edition ( S.K DUGGAL)
2. Design of Concrete Structures 14th Edition
3. Refresher Course and Field Reference Manual ( U Nyi Hla Nge)

76
Thank
You

77