Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Excellence
Boot Camp
DAY 1 Monday
8:15 0:30 Introductions and agenda review
Icebreaker
8:45 0:30 Era 0 - What it is and what it is not.
9:15 0:30 Free floor walk exercise
0:15 BREAK
10:00 0:15 Free floor walk - recap
10:15 1:15 OPX context and overview
11:30 0:15 OPX concerns and expectations - Q&A
11:45 0:45 LUNCH
12:30 1:00 Expectations of OPX Area Team
1:30 1:15 Transformation overview
Operating system - OPX elements
0:15 BREAK
3:00 2:00 OEE breakout simulation
5:00 Adjourn
DAY 2 Tuesday
8:15 0:15
0:30
Recap Fill in the
8:30 OEE revisited
9:00 1:00 Converting set up exercise names of your
10:15
0:15
1:45
BREAK
Order readiness
instructors as
Procedures the week
Machine readiness
12:00 0:45 LUNCH progresses.
12:45 0:45 Converting set up floor walk
1:30 1:45 Workplace organization intro
Workplace organization machine clean Feel free to
Workplace organization workstations
Workplace organization WIP contact them
Workplace organization other
Workplace organization video when you have
3:30
0:15
0:45
BREAK
Converting minor stops and speed
questions in the
4:15 1:00 Converting speed simulation future.
5:15 0:30 Converting simulation report out
5:45 Adjourn
Why might people mistakenly think that safety is incompatible with a performance-based
culture? How can we as leaders change their minds?
What evidence could we look for to see if safety is a priority in the plant?
The purpose of the QualityONE system in the OPX environment is to ensure the
prevention and correction of processes or behaviors that contribute to inefficiencies,
waste, and customer rejects. But under OPX, when we are helping operators produce more
throughput than ever before, quality could slip and OPX will fail if we don’t do our jobs to ensure
That QualityONE does not get ignored at the expense of making more boxes. Remember: it
doesn’t matter how many boxes you make if they are of such poor quality that nobody wants to
buy them.
Why might people mistakenly think that OPX is incompatible with QualityONE? How can we
ensure improvements in both quality and throughput?
What programs/tools does Smurfit-Stone have in place to help with Quality, and how can we
ensure they are being utilized during our time in the plants?
There is a common belief that if we turn up our machines to achieve higher throughput,
our Total Waste percentage will go up as well. This could be true in instances where there
isn’t an active waste management system in place. But under OPX this scenario is
unacceptable.
List a few instances of how stressing increased throughput could lead to higher total plant
waste:
–
–
–
How can we as leaders help plants both increase throughput AND improve their overall Total
Waste percentage?
What programs/tools does Smurfit-Stone have in place to help with the elimination of waste?
–
–
–
1. _____________________________________________________________________
2. _____________________________________________________________________
3. _____________________________________________________________________
1. _____________________________________________________________________
2. _____________________________________________________________________
3. _____________________________________________________________________
1. _____________________________________________________________________
2. _____________________________________________________________________
3. _____________________________________________________________________
Smurfit-Stone Container * Operational Excellence Boot Camp 13
Free floor walk recap – What did you see?
800 765
700 654
MSF
Shipped 600 546
Per 500
Plant 400
300
200
100
0
Weyerhaeuser Georgia Pacific Temple Inland International Smurfit Stone
Paper
Number of Box 86 54 69 67 130
Plants
Volume (BSF) 78.1 48 52.8 43.8 80.8
35
Competitor #1
30
25
20
15
10
TAPPI
SSCC
Era 2
Era 1
“Enhanced Manufacturing
Excellence”
Era 0
“Core Manufacturing
Excellence”
Standardized set of
OPX performance expectations
Management to support continuous
System improvement
Standardized set
OPX Operating
of practices and
System
procedures
Smurfit-Stone Creating a performance
Performance based culture thorough
Culture training and capability
building
Tools
OPX • Visual management boards
Management • Machine operating logs
System • Standard metrics and
Tools targets
• OPX Playbook OPX Operating
• SSCC SOPs System
• Local SOPs
Smurfit-Stone Tools
Performance • Roles descriptions
Culture • Talent review process
• Leadership
development/training
• Improve productivity in operations • OPX tools and playbook created, updated and
– Focus on throughput successfully utilized
– Drive standardized practices
– Clear performance metrics / targets and • Defined clear performance measures
leadership accountability
• OPX rollout team and training program to build
• Rationalize plant network with improved capabilities around the standardized OPX solution
throughput – doing more with less
• Multiple waves of Advanced OPX areas working
• Build customer credibility – making it simultaneously with OPX Teams
easier for customers to do business with
Smurfit-Stone • Diagnostics validate 20% to 40% throughput
opportunity on current asset base
• Reinforce that the AOM is the key line
manager responsible for productivity and • Rollout plans and targets provide OPX to core
safety results plants by mid-2008; linked with scaling and capital
plans
• Create a common scorecard that
incorporates scaling and productivity • OPX principles are being pushed through division
aspirations beyond initial focus areas, with reported
improvement on targeted machines
• Canada supported with 6 Rollout focused on area • Diagnostic is most tricky, and really
separate team seeded with • 2 week diagnostic of area challenges conventional norms
standard OPX content due to • 10 week installation at primary plant • Initial install builds capabilities of
visa obstacles with OPX coaches area/plant team
• Area and plant OPX champions • Subsequent plant install reinforces area
install in area ownership
• Area and plant OPX champions staff
7 Targeted areas will be selected for • Speeds deployment of OPX by
Advanced-OPX self-installation providing standardized OPX approach
for areas meeting performance
improvement prerequisites
Smurfit-Stone Container * Operational Excellence Boot Camp 29
ROLLOUT APPROACH DETAIL – WAVE 1 and 2 FOCUS OPX focus area
2007 OPX follow-on area
Mid-Feb Mar Jun Sep
Preparation Status
Wave 1 areas (March – May 2007) Advanced OPX (April 2007 bootcamp,
• Alabama May – July 2007 implementation)
• Atlanta
• Winston-Salem (Jan – Feb pilot) • N. Ohio
• Sioux Land
Wave 2 areas (June – August 2007) • Chicago
• Philadelphia • W. Tennessee
• Kansas City • St. Louis
• Eastern Shore • El Paso
• Los Angeles
• Ontario
Facilitators
• OPX Leadership
• OPX Champions / practitioners
• OPX Center staff
• Technical experts
Training objective
Provide basic tools for implementation, including:
• OPX design and concept understanding
• Basic coaching skill building
• Introduction to analytical skills for diagnostic and performance management
• OPX implementation processes and tools
1 2 3 4 5
Description • Establish prerequisites • Create baseline • Design endstate • Execute through • Check-in and follow-
• Fill data requests • Prioritize efforts • Create workplan plant team on coaching
• Introductory training • Establish unit • Define report out • Plan for area • Upward feedback on
specific targets requirements implementation OPX
Key activities 1.1• Collect data 2.1• Develop overall 3.1• Develop master 4.1• Rollout and re- 5.1• Follow-up
plant baseline implementation fine the phased performance
1.2• Plan out important (MIFA & OEE) plan OPX elements dialogues (area
meetings and and plant)
reviews 2.2• Plant opportunity 3.2• Tailor OPX ele- 4.2• Rollout the
assessment of ments to suit performance 5.2• OPX team circle
1.3• Prepare local man- OPX elements local plant con- management back for audit
agement for OPX ditions system and potential
2.3• Prioritization of Kaizen events
1.4• Establish the team, OPX element 3.3• Develop detailed 4.3• Coach plant
organise logistics implementation workstreams management 5.3• Update OPX
and provide OPX action plans transformation
team training 2.4• Set plant perfor- 4.4• Steering approach and
mance targets 3.4• Define steering Committee playbook based
Committee report out on lessons learnt
review
Key individuals • RVP and AOMs • OPX team • OPX team • Plant team • Plant management
• Plant management • Plant team • OPX team • RMMs
• OPX leads • OPX PMO
Smurfit-Stone
*Design requirements dependent on complexity Container * Operational Excellence Boot Camp
of plant implementation 38
IMPLEMENTATION IS FACILITATED BY OPX DEDICATED RESOURCES,
THOUGH RESPONSIBILITY FOR EXECUTION LIES WITH LINE
MANAGEMENT
Roles/accountabilities OPX team Line leadership Roles/accountabilities
• Drive and track OPX implementation, OPX Steering Committee
including OPX resource allocation
• VP Manufacturing • Regional VPs
• Guide the program and remove • VP OPX
roadblocks at a corporate level
• Maintain OPX content library
• Overall accountability for local delivery • Overall accountability for area and plant
• Ensure resources allocated to high-priority OPX Champion delivery
OPX elements Team leader Area Mgr • Remove roadblocks at an plant level
• Manage the project and track targets (1 per area team) • Dedicate area resources
• 10-20% time commitment
• Develop and lead OPX process for each • Serve as the local OPX custodian, from
workstream diagnostic through embedding phases
OPX Champion Plant Manager &
• Provide OPX expertise and experience (1-4 per area team) Plant Supint.
of project
• Deliver agree-upon targets
• Manage overall implementation
• 50% time commitment
• On the floor rollout support from Area & Plant • Provide ‘on the ground’ expertise to
diagnostic to implementation OPX Team tailor approach to plant conditions
• Become OPX team members by Supervisors • Initially provide workstream support in
(5-8 per area team)
learning process Local + pull forward diagnostic & design but then move to
“generalist” role during implementation
• 50% time commitment
Deliver ~200m of
operational cost
Deliver throughput savings in 2 years
Act as OPX change uplift at each plan
agents
Support and SSCC
collaborate with OPX 1
OPX team
2
OPX individuals
3 • Full Time Members
Plant • Area Champions
• Plant Champions
Leadership/ The individual exhibits great ability to lead; is well respected by peers and others;
management is sought for opinions by those around him; can manage teams effectively and
skills foster a productive working environment; can give guidance and has
mentorship ability
The individual has strong ability to analyze, disaggregate information in a
Analytical structured way, and draw purposeful insights; able to identify core issues; has
shown great capability in developing recommendations that are targeted toward
the issues
at handSmurfit-Stone Container * Operational Excellence Boot Camp
Source: Team analysis 43
A DESIRED PROFILE EXISTS FOR SUCCESSFUL CHANGE AGENTS
(CONTINUED)
Change agent example 2
Attribute Description
The individual is able to draw connections between issues and derive the related
Forward
implications; constantly aware of the next level of improvement required in
Thinking
area of work; seeks solutions that eradicate the root cause of problems instead of
containing problems
The individual can work efficiently alone; able to structure direction of work with
Independent minimal guidance and to execute work effectively; able to resolutely resolve
problems along the way
The individual can work effectively in a team environment; proactively help team
Team player members; able to develop good relationships with team members; shows desire
for team to excel, and participates actively in team problem-solving meetings
The individual is able to communicate thoughts well both orally and in writing; has
Communi-
good presentation skills and is able to answer questions confidently; effective
cations
communicator with people throughout organization
The individual feels at ease in any new environment; can adapt to the work
requirements in the new place quickly; able to interact and form relationships
Adaptability
with key personnel quickly in a new setting; can integrate into the culture of the
new place easily and get work moving quickly; is welcomed by the new
environment
Smurfit-Stone Container * Operational Excellence Boot Camp 44
Source: Team analysis
FOR PLANT MANAGERS AND SUPERVISORS THERE ARE ALSO
EXPECTED BEHAVIORS
Understanding and • Spending time with supervisors to • Asking questions when you do not
believing in the project ensure understanding of the effort understand what is being asked of you
“I know what is expected of • Explaining the need for success of OPX • Spending time with hourly workers to
me – and I agree with it and ensure understanding of the effort
it is meaningful” • Taking time to explain to hourly workers
the need for success of OPX
Plant
Throughput
Time
Beginnings of the Step-change Sustained change
change process improvement during in performance
OPX team post OPX
involvement involvement
Smurfit-Stone Container * Operational Excellence Boot Camp 46
Area and Plant OPX Champion Rollout
Area Alpha Area Beta Area Beta
Wave A Plant Plant 1 Plant 2
4 8 12 4 8 12 4 8 12 4 8 12 Comments
• Use the OPX Playbook, tools and other resources to help transform the plant.
OPX Team • Train key personnel in the use of OPX tools
• Communicate findings and progress with local plant management on progression
of the work plan.
• Improve Plant through put.
• Learn the OPX Playbook, Tools and determine other resources that are
Area Champion available and how to access them.
• Work with Site Leaders to learn Preparation, Diagnostic, Design and
Implementation strategies.
• Work with Area Operations Manager to determine an implementation
schedule for Beta plants and the resources that will be required.
• Lead the Area OPX Team in the Beta Plant implementations.
• Learn the OPX Playbook, Tools and determine other resources that are available
Plant Champion and how to access them.
• Work with respect to the Work plan and give feed back as to the successes and
failures.
• Apply the tools to determine the greatest opportunity in the plant and drive through
put.
• Deliver a consistent message to all management and shop floor employees.
• 5 min – Write at least one hope and one fear on separate Post-it notes
• 2 min – Place Post-its onto white board under broad categories Hopes and Fears
Process • 5 min – Arrange Post-its into more specific categories
• Remaining time – Discuss general categories
End products • Discussion of general hopes/fears of upcoming work for OPX Team
Enhanced quality,
cost, and service level Not just incremental;
by eradicating waste, a quantum leap
variability, and inflexibility improved over time
Sample distribution
Higher Addition-
“Voice of the spec. al cost
customer”
Price Cost
Standard deviation
customer
LCL UCL
will pay
“Voice of the process”
Typical focus of
Typical focus Typical focus of debottlenecking,
of lean Six Sigma FMS, or SMED
improvement improvement activity
work work
Smurfit-Stone Container * Operational Excellence Boot Camp 55
TRANSFORMING OPERATIONS REQUIRES A 3 DIMENSIONAL APPROACH
Mindsets and
capabilities
Management
systems
Limited initial impact; slow improvement
trajectory due to lack of operating system
expertise and buy-in
Mindsets and
capabilities
Impact constrained by existing operating
system design and existing management
systems
Performance
Operations organization management CI infrastructure
• What is the right size/ • What are the right metrics • What is the best way to
structure of the frontline to track performance of codify the production
team? operations and people? system and improvement
tools required?
• What is the right role • How should tracking and • How should a CI office be
profile for the frontline reporting systems be set up and run?
leader? designed? – Size
• How should frontline – Skills
teams link • How should targets be set – Relationship to line
organizationally to the and deployed? • How should the CI office
top management? progress over the change
journey?
• How should frontline • How should performance
support be organzed? review processes be run?
Diagnose
Design the
against the
future-state
elements of the
operating
operating
system
system
Are run by a dedicated project team, Are led by senior management engaging
with leadership acting as a steering the line, typically supported
committee by a program office
OF CHANGE
Think 25% Act/implement 75%
3 In addition, the mini-transformation must bring changes in • Install the systems that
experiences, expectations, role modeling, and skills to create this “new way of
drive real ability and desire to run the line better life” in operations
4 Each organizational position has a specific role to play once • Train change agents to
the production system is installed, and a desired mindset kick-start the change
and capability level to target during the mini-transformation
• Prepare line leaders and
5 Change agents bring “bursts” of change through redesign operators to sustain the
of the operating and management systems, and creating change
experiences and skills to create the performance culture
. . . but also
• There is more to riding a bike than just • There is more to it than just following a
following a set of instructions set of instructions
• Riding a bike depends on going beyond • A transformation depends on
knowledge or theory and being able to successfully integrating operating
integrate a set of activities and systems, management systems,
capabilities mindsets and capabilities (not just
understanding each one in theory)
• Riding a bike safely and successfully • A transformation path can be planned
depends on dealing with changes in to some extent, but it is more like a
terrain and unexpected events journey than a definable process
• There comes a moment when • People implementing lean typically
everything clicks and the whole thing experience a moment when “the light
comes together comes on,” and what was previously
neither intuitive nor obvious suddenly
makes sense
Smurfit-Stone Container * Operational Excellence Boot Camp 70
SUCCESSFUL TRANSFORMATIONS . . .
MIFA • Material and Information Flow Analysis (MIFA) depicts all the actions required to
bring a product through the flow from raw materials to the customer
• A MIFA is a one page, end to end overview of the entire operations, opportunities
and bottlenecks
• Creating a MIFA forces you look at the big picture, not just the individual
processes or tasks. The goal is to optimize the whole, not the individual
components
• Information gathered to create the MIFA should be obtained first-hand, and
directly from observations the shop floor
OEE
• Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) is a measure to evaluate the
productiveness of a machine or a production line
• The higher the OEE, the more good product per shift a machine or line produces
• OEE analysis is a tool used to analyze equipment performance, and should be
used in support of business objectives where there is a clear need
– Bottlenecks (machine or process) which constrain the capacity of a value stream
to meet customer needs
– High capital cost equipment where utilization must be raised to reduce asset
size
Smurfit-Stone Container * Operational Excellence Boot Camp 73
THERE ARE 6 STEPS TO CREATING A CURRENT STATE MIFA
Key Points:
• Draw in customer(s)
Big Staley
50 Saturn
Key Points:
• A Process is NOT the same as a
50 Kop
department or function
• A process is an activity where material can
stagnate either side
FLX 66
• Parallel processes are to be drawn above
each other-- although, this may not always
be possible (e.g. when there are 6
converting machines)
Speed = 2 h
23% Output =16 50 Kop
OEE = 19%
Corrugator capacity is greater K/hr = 2,252 2/2/2
• Bander is not a bottleneck
than converting, however
Speed
Output= =2 10
h • Improvement opportunity
excess capacity is filled by
OEE = 15% with steady operations and
sheet work 14% improved staging
FLX 66 K/hr = 1,783
-/2/-
Sheet Output
3% Speed
Output==22h ~ 8 MMSF
OEE = 7%
K/hr = 596 11%
Source: Team analysis, client productivity data (Sept 2006). *Based on 80% OEM for converting, FI targets for corrugator and machine measured cycletime for the
Bander
STEP 4: GATHER INVENTORY DATA KEY
EXAMPLE
-/-/- = FTE/Shift
Output = MMSF/mth
Material and Information Flow (MIFA) OEE*= % scheduled
Lf/hr = Feet per hour
K/hr = kicks per hour
Production scheduling Customer service
Daily orders ~ week in advance
Orders 1x/week Orders daily
Supplier Customers
Speed = 2 h
23% Output =16 50 Kop
OEE = 19%
Corrugator capacity is greater K/hr = 2,252 2/2/2
• Bander is not a bottleneck
than converting, however 0 day
Speed
Output= =2 10
h • Improvement opportunity
excess capacity is filled by
OEE = 15% with steady operations and
sheet work 14% improved staging
FLX 66 K/hr = 1,783
-/2/-
Sheet Output
3% Speed
Output==22h ~ 8 MMSF
OEE = 7%
K/hr = 596 11%
Source: Team analysis, client productivity data (Sept 2006). *Based on 80% OEM for converting, FI targets for corrugator and machine measured cycletime for the
Bander
STEP 5: DETERMINE EXTERNAL MATERIAL FLOW KEY
EXAMPLE
-/-/- = FTE/Shift
Output = MMSF/mth
Material and Information Flow (MIFA) OEE*= % scheduled
Lf/hr = Feet per hour
K/hr = kicks per hour
Production scheduling Customer service
Daily orders ~ week in advance
Orders 1x/week Orders daily
Supplier Customers
Daily production
Ward RDC Customer lead-time ~ 3-5 days
Schedules to plant
and daily variances
3/3/3
back from plant • Converting is current
2-4 week
Speed bottleneck, given corrugator
lead-time Output==215
h
21% OEE = 21% has capacity to generate
external sheet work
K/hr = 1,900
• Converting improvements
will shift bottleneck to the
corrugator
1x/week Big Staley ~25/day
2/2/2
11% Speed
Output==8
2h
Corrugator OEE = 14% 38 Saturn Bander
K/hr =1,223 2/2/2
~30-40 6/4/4 1/1/1 <2/3 day
days Speed
Speed
Output==271
h Output= =2 12
h Speed
Output= =2 71
h
OEE = 58% 17% 50 Saturn OEE = 16% OEE =28%
LF/hr = 23,618 K/hr = 2,462
Key Points: 2/3 day 3/3/3
Source: Team analysis, client productivity data (Sept 2006). *Based on 80% OEM for converting, FI targets for corrugator and machine measured cycletime for the
Bander
STEP 6: DETERMINE INFORMATION FLOW KEY
EXAMPLE
-/-/- = FTE/Shift
Output = MMSF/mth
Material and Information Flow (MIFA) OEE*= % scheduled
Lf/hr = Feet per hour
K/hr = kicks per hour
Production scheduling Customer service
Daily orders ~ week in advance
Orders 1x/week Orders daily
Supplier Customers
11% Speed
Output==8
2h
Corrugator OEE = 14% 38 Saturn Bander
K/hr =1,223 2/2/2
~30-40 6/4/4 1/1/1 <2/3 day
days Speed
Speed
Output==271
h Output= =2 12
h Speed
Output= =2 71
h
OEE = 58% 17% 50 Saturn OEE = 16% OEE =28%
LF/hr = 23,618 K/hr = 2,462
Key Points: 2/3 day 3/3/3
How much time per shift How well did the machine How many products were
was the machine actually perform (compared to the good the first time?
running? rated speed) when it was
actually running?
1 Breakdowns
Availability rate Downtime losses
2 Setups
3 Minor stops
Performance rate Speed losses
4 Speed loss
5 Scrap
Quality rate Quality losses
6 Rework
Time losses for breakdowns and setups need to be understood to improve the
availability rate
Examples
Breakdowns:
• Transfer of product is not possible due to broken
• Lost time due to machine failure
conveyor or faulty automation
• Loss measured by operator/ • Machine is shut off because of failures
maintenance tracking system
• Equipment stopped because operator is missing
Examples
Setups: • Fixtures and/or material types need to be changed
• Time interval between last good because of different product (product change)
part from prior run to first good • Equipment fixtures/tools need to be changed (tool
part from new run with machine change)
operating at rated speed • Periodic tests must be performed for product quality
• Measured by operator or process capability
downtime tracking or time study
Time losses for idling and minor stoppages as well as speed losses need to be
understood to improve the performance rate
Examples:
Minor stops:
• Downstream equipment is idle because product
• Lost time due to unplanned
supply from previous process is insufficient
stoppages other than
• Operators pause to “tweak” equipment (e.g., label
breakdown or setup
dispenser needs a minor fix or reloading; normal
• Measured through operator
work flow is interrupted)
tracking or calculated
Examples:
Speed Loss:
• Actual index time for an automated line is longer
• Lost time due to machine
than the ideal index time of 60 seconds (e.g.,
operating at slower speed than
produced 30 pieces in an hour when we should have
process design standard
been able to make 60 pieces in that period of time)
Time losses for scrap and rework need to be understood to improve the quality rate
Examples:
Scrap:
• Production time lost producing • Products that are caught at the source and scrapped
unusable materials
• Materials that are lost in the process
– Yield losses
• Measured scrap then converted – Material leakage/salvage, etc.
to time loss
– Startup material loss
Examples:
Rework: • Product that is rejected at final inspection, or end of
• Production time lost from process checks, then reworked to an acceptable
defective parts rejected at end quality level
of line or afterwards
• Measure usually a reject log of
total parts lost then calculated
for lost time
Total Time
(i.e., 24 hours x 7 days)
Non working time
Total Working Time
(e.g. weekends)
Corrugating OEE
Percent of time Effort and timing of OPX
elements is phased based on
3 9
100
93 15
throughput potential
5 2
17
61
3 0
Key learning
58 • Develop OEE across all
machines in order to get
accurate perspective of
Available Break- Setups Oper- Minor Speed Running Scrap Rework Effective performance losses
time downs ating stops loss time time
time
• Not all improvement
potential may be required
Converting OEE
Percent of time* as only bottleneck
improvement will increase
13 4 8 throughput of plant
100 45
2
• Collect detailed OEE
information that can then
53 19
be used as data for
17 – Set-up analysis
17 16 – Minor stop reasons
1 0
Available Break- Setups Oper- Minor Speed Running Scrap Rework Effective
time downs ating stops loss time time
time
1. Undertake simulation
Process • Use plant production data sheets to determine overall OEE
• Analyze minor stops data sheets to determine quantities of each major
OEE category
• Calculate category percentages
• Build OEE waterfall
2. Discuss with group results