Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Whether you work for a small business or a big major corporation, following ethical
principles matters.
Although businesses have to meet profitable opportunity and expectations, they also have
ethical responsibilities to look up to. Every person within the business, from the bottom
employee to the top of the organizational chart, must be cautious to meet these
responsibilities.
Core Principles Underlying Fairness,
Accountability, Transparency in Business
Operations and Stewardship
A business guided by ethical principles; behaving in an ethical manner can
create a positive atmosphere and may build a promising business
results. A business environment that promotes and upholds valued principles is
usually more productive.
FAIRNESS http://www.dictionary.com/browse/fairness
• In most businesses where there is a workplace, despite rules and policies and guiding
principles, an employed personnel regardless of its position, may tend to experience
injustices. Normally when money, competition, position, and pride are at stake, both
petty and serious unfairness's are inevitable. for instance, taking claim for another’s
work, shifting blames, unequal distribution of work load, promotions of the less
competent employee for biased reasons, and even double standards. Any businesses has
strict rules, but most often, when there is unfairness, grievance follows.
• As it happens, what is or is not fair is much more complicated and unclear than
it seems from the vantage point of the person who feels being short-changed.
Even though the underlying concepts of fairness and justice are simple, almost
intuitive and discerning, applying it in real life and in workplaces has been
proven to be somewhat difficult.
We tend to think and speak in terms of fairness when we are dealing with
the behavior of individuals and everyday interpersonal
relationships. We talk about justice and equity in the context of
broader social issues and institutional obligations to individuals. All these
apply to any situation where we want to judge whether an action contributes
to a good, rational, caring society.
The moral obligations arising from the core ethical value of fairness
are almost always associated with the exercise of power to
render judgments that grant benefits or impose burdens. Almost
everyone has the power to give or withhold benefits such as
showing approval, giving praise, honor, and
support, or to impose burdens such as disapproval on reports and
proposals, giving negative criticism, blame, and worse is
condemnation that makes significant affect in our lives.
The moral duty to be fair places constraints on our judgments and actions. There
are two aspects of fairness: a) fair results which is substantive fairness and b) fair
procedures which is procedural fairness.
Substantive Fairness
Different contexts and political ideologies yield different and often incompatible
criteria for substantive fairness. A fair result is one in which people receive
what they are due and what they deserve. Unfortunately, there
are no agreed to criteria to determine what a person really ought to have.
Some argue that true fairness is equality (each person
receives an equal share of benefits and burdens). Others believe
the better criterion is merit (those who are most competent and
who produce the most deserve the most). Still others believe
that benefits should be allocated based on need and burdens on
the ability to carry them. Other theories of “distributive justice”
include resource allocation based on effort,
social contribution, seniority, and legal rights.
• The wide variety of approaches to fairness means that for every decision there will
be people who claim it is unfair. And they’re right —according to their personal
criteria. Thus, in making difficult decisions that affect several stakeholders who have
conflicting interests, it is impossible to come to a single, indisputably fair result.
Nor is it possible to satisfy everyone. Generally, those who consider
themselves winners in the decision will consider the result just, and those who see
themselves as losers consider it unjust. This observation suggests three important
rules about the fairness of decisions;
• First, since disagreement, differences and criticism are unavoidable we must satisfy
ourselves with doing our very best to reach a fair judgment based on
our conscience and ethically justifiable standards of fairness.
• Secondly, we should be clear in our own minds about the criteria of fairness
we are using and let others know, ahead of time if possible, what those
standards are. For example, in hiring applicants, we evaluate based on
qualifications and make comparisons. It is helpful to everyone
if we know and disclose what we think is relevant and irrelevant to the
decision and, if we can, how we rank other factors.
• The third rule in making decisions is that the procedures we use in decision
making must be and should appear to be fair. In many cases, a judgment is
defended primarily in terms of the process used to reach it. In effect, one can
argue that a fair process always yields an ethically
justifiable result.
Procedural Fairness
Fairness requires that the procedure of making decisions may reveals a conscious
concern with reaching a fair, just, and equitable result. Decisions should be made,
and should appear to be made, cautiously, truthfully, and objectively,
with the knowledge that even a process of the greatest integrity does not always
produce certainty.
Fair Notice
Determine whether the person accused had fair notice that the conduct was wrong. Simply cases
such as lying, cheating, and stealing, may not be much of a problem but more technical violations,
such as when you are a public servant and receiving improper gifts or using company assets,
requires more investigation.
If you determine that the person knew or should have known about the proper standards of conduct,
further action on your part is fair. If, however, you decide that the person did not know and
reasonably could not be expected to know of a rule, fairness may dictate nothing stronger than a
warning.
Impartiality
One should be sure of fair and impartial judge. This means you are willing to
suspend judgment until all the information has been laid in, setting aside conclusions
you may have made and clear your mind of prejudice or prejudging about the person or
issues involved.
Gather Facts
Make reasonable efforts to gather facts. Thoroughness without being
irrational is important in making sound judgments. What do you actually know? Are
there uncertainties in the facts that needs to be clarified? If you are making
comparisons do you have sufficient information on each candidate concerning the
factors you think are most important? If you are adjudicating facts, is there any way of
confirming your suspicions or the accuser's claim of innocence without unduly
embarrassing that person.
Fair Hearing
Anyone being accused of sometime should be allowed to tell his/her side of the
story. The “right of confrontation” is a fundamental prerequisite of
fairness in personal and business relationships. Anyone should be given the
opportunity to explain, clarify, and ask questions, and you must listen with a
truly open mind.
Evaluation
Carefully weigh and evaluate all the information by separating facts from
opinions and opinions from speculation. Don’t be afraid to draw reasonable
inferences but know when you have done so and the premises on which
you base your conclusion.
Principles of Fairness
• Treat everyone fairly based on their merits and abilities and handle all essentially
similar situations similarly and with regularity.
• Make all decisions on appropriate criteria, without favoritism or discrimination.
• Never blame or punish anyone for what they did not do, and appropriately sanction
those who violate moral obligations or laws.
• Promptly and voluntarily correct personal and institutional mistakes and indecency.
• Not take unfair advantage of anyone's mistakes more so, ignorance.
• Fully consider the rights, interests, and perspectives of all
stakeholders, approach judgments with open-minded impartiality, conscientiously
gather and verify facts, provide critical stakeholders with an opportunity to explain
or clarify, and carefully evaluate the information.
• Accountability
ac·count·a·bil·i·ty əˌkoun(t)əˈbilədē/
noun
1. - the fact or condition of being accountable;
2. responsibility.
Leadership Accountability
In any organization, leaders normally take the blame in any case of
failure. To change this behavior and create an environment where all levels can
flourish and work as a team, view failure as a learning opportunity and make it a core
principle of your culture—not a chance to place the blame.
What does accountability look like?
Accountability in Companies
Accountability also has a connection to expectations. Employees who
do not meet the expectations of their supervisor are held accountable
for their actions and must answer for their inability to do so.
Accountability is crucial to ensuring high performance within an
organization. However, managers must clearly communicate their expectations
to the person who is responsible for the specified action or task. Clear
communication of expectations and well defined goals is a very effective tool to
enhancing performance at every level of organization.
Without defined goals, employees lack a frame of reference for how they are
performing in the workplace. They are unable to rely on guidelines or a structure
that helps them achieve their performance goals. In many organizations, the
management team and board of directors create goals for themselves and the general
manager, while the general manager creates goals for department managers. This
process is replicated throughout the organization, down to the department managers
who create goals for entry-level employees.
Transparency
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/transparency
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/stewardship
Stewardship in Practice
Not all businesses engage in active stewardship. Some perform activities that
have a minimal impact on the environment, while others focus on different
areas of corporate responsibility. When a business does engage in stewardship
it must generally state its commitment to bear responsibility for
the effects its operations have on the environment. Many businesses work with
environmental agencies to improve their practices.
Elements
Stewardship can include one or more of a long list of specific practices and
elements. For businesses engaged in manufacturing this includes sourcing raw materials
that are renewable and using chemicals and processes that are safe for the environment. For all
types of businesses, using email and mobile devices to reduce paper consumption as it is
called, paperless, is a form of stewardship.
Costs
Engaging in active environmental stewardship comes at a higher price. For instance,
employing renewable energy alternatives, such as hybrid vehicles or a solar-powered factory,
are on the cutting edge of stewardship but also require large initial investments which is the
reasons for some company to act differently as a steward. Tax credits can help offset these
costs, as can the savings that come from a reduced reliance on environmentally harmful energy
sources with rising prices, such as petroleum. Managing stewardship as part of a budget is a
big challenge for every businesses that seeks help improve its environmental status.
Outcome
Stewardship in business has a several possible benefits. Collectively it
reduces energy usage, protects natural resources and improves public health. For
individual businesses that commit themselves to stewardship, the decision may have a
positive impact for the business. Some companies earn certifications from
environmental agencies that serve a marketing function, making their actions known to
consumers and customers. This gives them a good imagery and is favorable in their
marketing campaigns.
Let us take for instance, computer manufacturer Apple, holds a Gold rating from the
Electronic Product Environmental Assessment Tool in 2011. For environmentally
conscious clients, such certifications play a role in their buying decisions.
THANK YOU!