Professional Documents
Culture Documents
References
Munson, B. R., Okiishi, T. H., Huebsch, W. W. & Rothmayer, A. P., 2013. Fluid Mechanics. 7 ed. Danvers: Wiley.
White, F. M., 2011. Fluid Mechanics. 7 ed. New York: McGraw Hill Higher Education.
Douglas, J. F., Gasiorek, J. M., Swaffield, J. A. & Jack, L. B., 2011. Fluid Mechanics. 6 ed. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
Objectives
• Recognise the significance of the Reynolds
Number, Re, in classifying fluid flow.
• Identify the point of fully developed flow.
• Explain use of the friction coefficient, f and/or
, in the solution of laminar and turbulent flow
problems
• Use moody diagrams to find values for
Reynolds Numbers relating to specific friction
and roughness coefficient
INITIAL THEORIES
• HAGEN – POISEUILLE
– Hf V
• D’ARCY
– Hf V2
0.2
0.18
0.16
0.14
0.12
hf/l
hf/l
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
V (m/s)
Economic Velocities
Source: CIBSE Guide C Table 4.6
n1.75
Log Hf/l
0.1
n=1
0.01
1 10
Log V (m/s)
FLOW CLASSIFICATION
For internal flow:
• Turbulent Turbulent
– Re>3000
• Critical Zone Transition
– 3000>Re>2000
• Laminar
Laminar
– Re<2000
LAMINAR FLOW
• Fluid virtually stationary at pipe walls
therefore smooth pipe maintains laminar
flow – can still be laminar in “rough” pipes.
• Viscous forces prominent.
• Inertia forces exist.
TURBULENT FLOW
• Most likely “real time” flow.
• Roughness of pipe will increase the effects
of turbulence.
• Inertia forces prominent.
• Chaotic mixing of particles.
DETERMINING FLOW TYPE
• Reynolds:
– Flow types are related to forces acting on
fluid.
– Classified flow by the Reynolds Number Re
– Re = Inertia forces/Viscous forces
FORCES
l
,v,a l
V=k1l3
m=k1l3
v=k2l/t
a=k3l/t2
INERTIA FORCES
t
l
,v,a l
l
,v,a l
Fviscous = A
dv
= A
dl
v 2
= k 5l
k l
4
k
Fviscous = 5 vl
k4
Reynolds number
Inertia Force ma
Re
Viscous Force A
k1k3 k 4 l 2v 2 lv
Re 2
C
k 2 k5 vl
or :
dv dv
Re
Flow on plates and in tubes
Laminar Transition Turbulent
U
d = Velocity
boundary
layer
U 0.99 U
Laminar Turbulent
Hydrodynamic entrance region velocity velocity
profile profile
Entrance length
• Fully developed flow requires sufficient pipe length to
evolve.
• Also consider thermal entrance length in heat transfer
problems.
• In some applications it may be desirable to retain the
inviscid core, in others viscous flow may be the goal.
• Full development can be estimated:
Le
0.06Re
– Laminar d
Le 1
1.6Re 4 for Re 107
– Turbulent d
Entry length
• The following simulations are based on a
150mm pipe with the following:
– Laminar flow: Re = 1500
– Turbulent flow: u=2m/s
• Case files and raw velocity profiles on ELE
Laminar profiles, Re=1500
2m 13.5m
Inlet
5m
Selected velocity profiles
Turbulent profiles, u=2m/s
(Re290,000)
2m 5.4m
Inlet
5m
Selected velocity profiles
Losses
• We must be able to predict losses:
– To determine normal transmission losses.
– To account for sudden enlargements
– To account for the effect of fittings
• By doing so we can adequately size plant.
• In fluids there are a large number of coefficients
and relationships that have been developed
theoretically and confirmed empirically.
Friction losses
• By inspection, the head loss due to friction HL
will depend upon
– The length of the pipe (m); L
– The diameter of the pipe (m); d
– The mean velocity of the flow (m / s); V or v or u
– The viscosity of the fluid (kg / m.s);
• Less obviously
– The fluid density (kg / m3); ρ
– The roughness height of the internal wall (m); k or
Friction losses for flow types
4flv 2 Proof here
hf
2gd
32 lV
P 2
D
Proof here
Steady and uniform flow
• We can analyze the friction factor with
dimensional analysis. If:
f d ,v , , , k
• We can show:
dv k
f ,
d
Dimensional analysis
• If: f d , v , , , k
f [M 0L0T 0 ]
d L
v LT 1
ML1T 1
ML3
k L
M : 0 c 1 M :0 c
L:0 abc 3 L : 0 a b c 1
T : 0 b c T : 0 b c
So a 1,b 1,c -1 So a 1,b 0,c 0
dv k
1 2
d
Dimensional analysis
• From the previous analysis we can see
that the friction factor f is a function of Re
and the relative roughness (=k/d)
• f was disregarded in the analysis for
simplicity, an analysis with f included
would not change the end result.
Other dimensionless groups
It is often necessary to
u
Ma Mach number determine a characteristic
c length in dimensional analysis,
u the term ‘l’ may not always be a
Fr Froude number
gz distance between 2 points so
hL always check the parameters
Nu Nusselt number that you are considering.
k
g T 2l 3 The Reynolds number is a very
Gr Grashof number good example of this as the
2
characteristic length can be
P anything from a distance on a
Cp Pressure coefficient
V 2
flat plate, the diameter of a pipe
or the diameter of a pump
2
impeller.
Friction factor
• When determining the friction factor we note that
relative roughness is a factor and that it is
dependant on pipe diameter.
• Experiments have conclusively shown that the
relative roughness has no effect on the friction
factor at low Reynolds numbers ie laminar flow
hence the differences earlier discussed.
• Equally the roughness does not influence the
friction factor when considering turbulent flow
through “smooth” pipes (very idealised although
modern manufacturing techniques are producing
nearly smooth pipes)
Colebrook white equation
k
1 2.51 d
2log
Re 3.7
[CIBSE C4.3.3, Page 4-3]
Moody diagram
COLEBROOK –
WHITE
64.4/Re
APPROXIMATION
0.316/Re0.25
Haaland equation
1 6.9 k / d 1.11
1.8log
Re 3.71
1 2
p v
2
[CIBSE C4.3.3, Page 4-4]
Fittings -