II.

National Commission on Indigenous

Peoples (NCIP) and Indigenous Cultural
Communities/Indigenous Peoples (ICCs/IPs)
11 Building Blocks for a resilient, responsive
& relevant ICCs/IPs Community
as of October 9,2022
I. Profile of the Indigenous Cultural Communities / Indigenous Peoples (ICCs/IPs)

CAR & REGION I REGION II

Applai, Ayangan, Bago, Balangao, Bontok, Agta, Ayangan, Bugkalot/Ilongot, Calinga, Gaddang,
Gaddang, Ibaloi, Iwak, Isneg/Isnag/Yapayao,
Itneg/Tinguian, Kalanguya, Kalinga, Kankanaey, 14,184,645 IP
Ibanag, Ibatan, Isinai, Itawes, Ivatan,
POPULATION FY Iwak,
2007
Ikalahan, Kankanawy, Malaweg, Yapayao, Yogad
Kalanguya-
Karao, Tuwali (16% of the total Population of the country)
REGION III & REST OF LUZON (R III, RIVA & RV)
ISLAND GROUPS & REST OF VISAYAS Agta, Alta, Abelling, Ayta Ambala, Ayta Sambal, Ayta
(RIVB, RVI & R VII)
● Mindanao: 8,936,326
Magantsi, (63%) Ayta Mag-indi, Bdjao,
Ayta Magbukun,
Alangan, Ata, Ati, Bangon, Bantoanon, Dumagat, Ilongot/Bugkalot, Kalanguya,
Batak, Buhid, Cuyonon, Eskaya, Kabihug/Manide
Gubatnon, Hanunuo, Iraya, Negros ● Luzon: 4,822,779 (34%)
Bukidnon, Molbog, Pala’wan, Panay
Bukidnon, Ratagnon, Tagabukid, Taga NORTHERN & WESTERN MINDANAO
Bukid, Tadyawan, Tagbanua, Tagbanua ● Visayas: 425,540(RIX
(3%)
& RX)
Calamianem, Tagbanua Tandulanen, Bukidnon, Kolibogan, Sama, Sama Dilaut,
Taobuid Note: Sama Bangingi, Subanen/Subanon,
• Projected IP Population using
Higaonon, the Manobo,
Kamigin, 2007 annual
Matigsalug,
Talaandig, Tigwahanon, Umayamnon,
SOUTHERN & EASTERN MINDANAO (RXI & RXIII) population growth rate of 2.16% provided by then
Yakan,
Ata, Ata Manobo, Bagobo Klata, Bagobo Tagabawa, National Statistics Office (NSO)
Blaan, Banwaon, Dibabawon, Higaonon, • Based on the DSWD data, the number of IP
Kagan/Kalagan, Mamanwa, Mandaya,
Mangguangan, Manobo, Mansaka, Matigsalug, Obu
beneficiaries of Social Amelioration
CENTRAL MINDANAO (RXII) Program (SAP) for
Manuvu, Sama, Tagakaulo, Talaandig FY 2020,Tagabawa,
Bagobo totalled to Blaan,
20 Million individuals
Erumanen or 750,000
Ne Menuvu, Manobo
Blit, Manobo Dulangan, Obu, Obu Menuvu, Taboli Manobo,
families.
Tagakaolo, Tboli, Teduray, Tinonanon Monuvu
II. 4 Bundles of Rights: 36 ICC/IP Rights
Republic of the Philippines
National Commission on Indigenous Peoples
36 Rights of the ICCs/IPs under the IPRA and its IRR
Right to Ancestral Right to Self-governance and Empowerment​ Right to Social Justice and Right to Cultural Integrity
Domains/Lands Human Rights
11. Authentication of Indigenous leadership Titles 25. Protection of Indigenous Culture,
and Certificates of tribal membership​ 18. Equal protection and non- Traditions and Institutions​
1. Right of ownership discrimination of ICCs/Ips 26. Right to establish and control their
12. Recognition of Socio-Political Institutions and educational and learning systems​
2. Right to develop lands and structures ​ 19. Rights during armed conflict​ 27. Recognition of cultural diversity​
natural resources​ 28. Recognition of customary laws and
13. Right to use their own commonly accepted 20. Freedom from Discrimination practices governing civil relations​
3. Right to stay in territories justice systems, conflict resolution institutions, and Right to equal opportunity 29. Right to name, identity and history​
peace building processes or mechanisms and and treatment​ 30. Protection of Community
4. Right in case of other customary laws and practices within their Intellectual Rights​
displacement​ respective communities and as may be 21. Basic services​ 31. Rights to religious, cultural sites
compatible with the national legal system and and ceremonies​
5. Right to regulate entry of with internationally recognized human rights​ 22. Equal rights for women 32. Right to Indigenous Spiritual Beliefs
migrants​ and Traditions, and Protection
14. Right to participate in decision-making 23. Rights of Children and Youth​ of Sacred Places​
6. Right to safe and clean air (mandatory representation in policy-making 33. Rights to IKSP​
and water​ bodies and other local legislative councils)​ 24. Right to integrated system of 34. Protection of biological and genetic
education/right to education resources​
7. Right to claim parts of 15. Right to determine and decide priorities for 35. Sustainable agro-technical
reservation​ development​ development​
36. Right to receive from the national
8. Right to resolve conflict​ 16. Tribal barangays​ gov’t funds for archeological and
historical sites​
9. Right to transfer 17. Right to Organize and Associate for collective
land/property​ actions
10. Right to redemption​
III. 11 Building Blocks of a Resilient, Responsive and Relevant ICCs/IPs Ancestral Domains
IPRA Provision Guidelines, Policies, SOPs Implications 1.
1. Confirmation of IPS
Confirmation of IPS
a. SEC. 13. Self- Administrative Order No. 2, S. Positive Implications (if acted): 2. Registration &
Governance. 2012 (The General Guidelines a. Compliance with State obligation to recognize the
inherent right of ICCs/IPs to self-governance Accreditation of IPO
b. SEC. 20. Means for on the Confirmation of IPS and 3. CADT/CALT Delineation
b. Recognition of authentic leadership, indigenous
Development/Empowerm the Registration of IPOs) leadership titles, structures Process
ent of ICCs/lPs.
4. Establishment of ADMO
c. Section 3i: Indigenous Negative Implications (if not acted):
Political Structures c. Non-compliance with State obligation to recognize the 5. ADSDPP Formulation
d. IRR: Sec 1 and 4, part 1 inherent right of ICCs/IPs right to self-governance. Non- 6. IP Wealth Management-
rule IV
recognition of their right to self-governance; Mainstream CRMDP Formulation;
governance/management of AD may invade customary 7. Institutionalization of CP:
processes of ICCs/management of their AD and affairs.
d. Community unrepairable divisions and conflict will FPIC & EPR
continue. 8. Effective IPMR in the
e. Domination of few who are exposed to the mainstream Local Legislative Bodies
culture of cash economy,  individualism,  materialism and 9. Efficient & Enhanced
consumerisms at the expense of weak members
f. Customary laws, sacred traditions and IKSP in general MOA/MOU/MOC
will forever be lost. It will become a thing of the past Formulation
g. Collective rights will be gone 10. Socio-Economic
h. Ancestral domains will be divided into pieces and will land
Activities with IP
in the hands of the non IPs
Cooperatives
11. Ancestral Domain
Indigenous Political Structure (IPS) Defense System
Strengthening and Operationalization
III. 11 Building Blocks of a Resilient, Responsive and Relevant ICCs/IPs Ancestral Domains
1. IPS/COE & Traditional Leaders Confirmation (OEHR); 1.
1. Confirmation of IPS
Confirmation of IPS
a. Who are the traditional leaders 2. Registration &
b. Who are the clan leaders Accreditation of IPO
c. Traditional institutions 3. CADT/CALT Delineation
d. Hindrance for strengthening & unification of the IPS Process
e. Causes of leadership disunity, if there is any 4. Establishment of ADMO
5. ADSDPP Formulation
f. Does the community understand well what is IPS & its equivalent in the community 6. IP Wealth Management-
g. Current strength of the IPS CRMDP Formulation;
h. What hinders the determination & confirmation of the IPS 7. Institutionalization of CP:
I. What threatened the current IPS or the leadership in the community FPIC & EPR
j. Any opportunity to further strengthen the IPS 8. Effective IPMR in the
Local Legislative Bodies
k. Is there harmony, unity & cohesiveness between the IPS, IPO, ADMO & IPMRs; 9. Efficient & Enhanced
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Cooperatives
11. Ancestral Domain
Indigenous Political Structure (IPS) Defense System
Strengthening and Operationalization
III. 11 Building Blocks of a Resilient, Responsive and Relevant ICCs/IPs Ancestral Domains
Indigenous Peoples Organization (IPO) 1. Confirmation of IPS
Strengthening and Operationalization
22. Registration
Registration &
Accreditation of&IPO
IPRA Provision Guidelines, Policies, SOPs Implications Accreditation
3. CADT/CALT of IPO
Delineation
a. SEC. 19. Role of Peoples Administrative Order No. 2, S. Positive Implications (if acted): Process
Organizations. 2012 (The General Guidelines a. Compliance with State obligation to 4. Establishment of ADMO
b. Section 3 (n) People's on the Confirmation of IPS and recognize and respect the role of IPOs 5. ADSDPP Formulation
Organization the Registration of IPOs) b. Recognition of IPs’ right to organize and 6. IP Wealth Management-
c. IRR: Sec 1, 2, & 3 part II associate for collective actions CRMDP Formulation;
rule IV. c. Recognition of the role of IPOs as 7. Institutionalization of CP:
partners in development FPIC & EPR
Negative Implications (if not acted): 8. Effective IPMR in the
d. IP collective economic rights will not be Local Legislative Bodies
realized but will go to the non IP 9. Efficient & Enhanced
businessmen MOA/MOU/MOC
e. Without the capacitated IPO the technical Formulation
and economic assistance to the IPS will be 10. Socio-Economic
taken by NGO Activities with IP
f. Non-compliance with State obligation to Cooperatives
recognize and respect the role of ICC/IP
11. Ancestral Domain
organizations
Defense System
III. 11 Building Blocks of a Resilient, Responsive and Relevant ICCs/IPs Ancestral Domains
2. Indigenous Peoples
Setting-up of the IPO. Organization
Its Accreditation & Registration(IPO)
(OEHR);
1. Confirmation of IPS
a. Is Strengthening
the IPO existing? and
registered & accredited? To where?
Operationalization
b. If not accredited or registered, why? 22. Registration
Registration &
Accreditation of&IPO
c. What hinder the non-organizing? Problems encountered? Accreditation
3. CADT/CALT of IPO
Delineation
d. Does the community appreciate the importance & significance of an IPO? Process
4. Establishment of ADMO
e. What is the current strength of the IPO?
5. ADSDPP Formulation
f. Any current situation to consolidate the unity of the IPO or threaten the organization? 6. IP Wealth Management-
g. What is the organizational structure of the IPO? Who are the leaders? Manner of CRMDP Formulation;
selection? 7. Institutionalization of CP:
h. Is there cohesiveness, unity of efforts & harmony between the IPO, IPS, ADMO & FPIC & EPR
8. Effective IPMR in the
IPMR;
Local Legislative Bodies
9. Efficient & Enhanced
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Cooperatives
11. Ancestral Domain
Defense System
III. 11 Building Blocks of a Resilient, Responsive and Relevant ICCs/IPs Ancestral Domains
IPRA Provision
a. SEC. 4. Concept of Ancestral
Lands/Domains.
b. SEC. 5. Indigenous Concept of
Ownership.
c. SEC. 6. Composition of Ancestral
Lands/Domains.
d. SEC. 7. Rights to Ancestral
Domains.
e. SEC. 8. Rights to Ancestral
Lands.
f. SEC. 9. Responsibilities of
ICCs/IPs to their Ancestral
Domains.
g. SEC. 10. Unauthorized and
Unlawful Intrusion.
h. SEC. 11. Recognition of Ancestral
Domain Rights.
i. SEC. 51. Delineation and
Recognition of Ancestral
Domains.
j. SEC. 52. Delineation Process.
k. SEC. 53. Identification,
Delineation and Certification of
Ancestral Lands
l. SEC. 54. Fraudulent Claims.
m. SEC. 55. Communal Rights.
Certificate of Ancestral Domain Title (CADT)/Certificate of
Ancestral Land Title (CALT)/Clans (Lot Area)
(to be operated by IPO under the supervision of IPS)
Guidelines, Policies, SOPs
Administrative Order No. 1, S.
2020 (Rules on Delineation and
Recognition of Ancestral
Domains and Ancestral Lands of
2020 and other Processes)
Implications
Positive Implications (if acted): 1. Confirmation of IPS
a. Compliance with State obligation/Constitutional mandate to recognize 2. Registration &
ICCs/IPs right to ownership of their AD/AL Accreditation of IPO
b. Recognition of ICCs/IPs’ private but community property 3.3.CADT/CALT
CADT/CALT Delineation
c. Security of ADs/ALs
d. Possession, control, management and development of ADs by
Delineation
Process Process
ICCs/IPs
4. Establishment of ADMO
Negative Implications (if not acted): 5. ADSDPP Formulation
e. Non-compliance with State obligation to recognize ICCs/IPs rights to 6. IP Wealth Management-
ownership of their AD/AL and other related rights thereto; Continued CRMDP Formulation;
encroachment of ADs by non-IPs; 7. Institutionalization of CP:
f. With its implementation, the rights of ICCs/IPs to their ancestral
FPIC & EPR
domains/lands (ADS/ALs) are recognized and respected.
g. Its non-implementation will result to the non-fulfillment of the
8. Effective IPMR in the
Constitutional mandate of protecting the ICCs/IPs’ rights to their Local Legislative Bodies
ADs/ALs . 9. Efficient & Enhanced
h. AD will be divided into pieces and will go to the hands of migrants/non- MOA/MOU/MOC
IPs
Formulation
i. Total displacement of IPs of the present generation, as well as  the
next generation 
10. Socio-Economic
j. Entire being of the IPs, their culture, histories will disappear Activities with IP
Cooperatives
11. Ancestral Domain
Defense System
III. 11 Building Blocks of a Resilient, Responsive and Relevant ICCs/IPs Ancestral Domains
3. CADT/CALT Delineation & Registration (ADO/LAO);
1. Confirmation of IPS
a. Is the AD/AL already delineated? When? Who financed? If no why? 2. Registration &
b. Is the AD/AL already registered? When? Who financed? If no, why? Accreditation of IPO
c. Is the AD/AL on process? When started to be processed? Who financed? What 3.3.CADT/CALT
CADT/CALT Delineation
stage? Delineation
Process Process
d. Is AD/AL is not applied for? Why? 4. Establishment of ADMO
5. ADSDPP Formulation
e. What are the weakness & threats within the community that prevented its processing 6. IP Wealth Management-
of AD/AL? CRMDP Formulation;
7. Institutionalization of CP:
FPIC & EPR
8. Effective IPMR in the
Local Legislative Bodies
9. Efficient & Enhanced
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Certificate of Ancestral Domain Title (CADT)/Certificate of Cooperatives
11. Ancestral Domain
Ancestral Land Title (CALT)/Clans (Lot Area) Defense System
(to be operated by IPO under the supervision of IPS)
III. 11 Building Blocks of a Resilient, Responsive and Relevant ICCs/IPs Ancestral Domains
IPRA Provision Guidelines, Policies, SOPs Implications 1. Confirmation of IPS
a. Section 3 (e) Guidelines : on-going effort to Positive Implications (if acted): 2. Registration &
Communal Claims draft guidelines a. With its implementation, the ICCs/IP’s right to Accreditation of IPO
b. Section 3 (o) self-governance and self-determination is
fortified and matters related its exercise will be 3. CADT/CALT Delineation
Sustainable Traditional
Resource Rights efficiently handled given the establishment of Process
c. SEC. 5. Indigenous ADMO per ancestral domain. 4.4. Establishment of
Establishment of ADMO
Concept of Ownership. 5. ADSDPP Formulation
d. Section 7 (b) Right to Negative Implications (if not acted): ADMO
6. IP Wealth Management-
b. If no ADMO established, all resources, and
Develop Lands and
other economic benefits derived therefrom will
CRMDP Formulation;
Natural Resources. not be fully enjoyed by the community. 7. Institutionalization of CP:
e. SEC. 19. Role of c. Transactions and dealings by migrants,  NGOs, FPIC & EPR
Peoples Organizations. businessmen,  investors and even Government 8. Effective IPMR in the
f. SEC. 20. Means for agencies will be made directly to individual Local Legislative Bodies
Development/Empower members to the detriment of the whole domain,
ment of ICCs/lPs.
9. Efficient & Enhanced
and creating conflicts and confusion in the
g. IRR: Sec 1, 2, & 3 part community. MOA/MOU/MOC
II rule IV. Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Cooperatives
11. Ancestral Domain
Ancestral Domain Management Office (ADMO) Defense System
(Door)
III. 11 Building Blocks of a Resilient, Responsive and Relevant ICCs/IPs Ancestral Domains

4. ADMO Manning & Operationalization (OEHR & ADO); 1. Confirmation of IPS

a. Is the ADMO already set-up? 2. Registration &
b. Who are members assigned? Accreditation of IPO
3. CADT/CALT Delineation
c. How are they chosen? Skills of management members and the different positions
Process
identified?
4.4. Establishment of
Establishment of ADMO
d. Basis for selection? 5. ADSDPP Formulation
e. Any problems encountered by the ADMO? ADMO
6. IP Wealth Management-
f. Any opportunities the ADMO can explore? CRMDP Formulation;
7. Institutionalization of CP:
g. What is the weakness & strength of the current ADMO?
FPIC & EPR
h. What is/are the threat encountered by the ADMO? 8. Effective IPMR in the
i. If the ADMO is not yet set-up? Why? What are plans of NCIP & the community?; Local Legislative Bodies
j. Is there unity, cohesiveness and harmony between ADMO, IPO, IPS & IPMRs?; 9. Efficient & Enhanced
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Ancestral Domain Management Office (ADMO) Activities with IP
Cooperatives
(Door) 11. Ancestral Domain
Defense System
III. 11 Building Blocks of a Resilient, Responsive and Relevant ICCs/IPs Ancestral Domains
IPRA Provision Guidelines, Policies, SOPs Implications
1. Confirmation of IPS
a. Section 7 (b) Right to a. Administrative Order No. 2, S. Positive Implications (if acted):
a. ADSDPP formulation is a must as its implementation will 2. Registration &
Develop Lands and 2018 (Revised Guidelines on
the Formulation of ADSDPP)
redound to the benefit of the ICCs/IPs in their exercise of their Accreditation of IPO
Natural Resources.
b. Guidelines : FPIC guidelines
right to determine and decide their own priorities for 3. CADT/CALT Delineation
b. SEC. 17. Right to development affecting their lives, beliefs, institutions, spiritual
Determine and well-being, and the lands they own, occupy or use. It will also
Process
Decide Priorities for enable them to participate in the formulation, implementation 4. Establishment of ADMO
Development.
and evaluation of policies, plans and programs for national, 5.5.ADSDPP Formulation
ADSDPP Formulation
regional and local development which may directly affect 6. IP Wealth Management-
c. SEC. 58. them.
Environmental CRMDP Formulation;
Considerations. Negative Implications (if not acted): 7. Institutionalization of CP:
b. If there is no ADSDPP formulation, plans of ICCs/IPs for the FPIC & EPR
development, conservation and management of their ADs will
not be known; overlap of other plans prepared by other
8. Effective IPMR in the
agencies that may not consider ICCs/IPs plans/priorities Local Legislative Bodies
c. Conflict of access to wealth and resources 9. Efficient & Enhanced
d. IP culture on sharing distorted MOA/MOU/MOC
e. Opportunity of other interested parties to meddle with the AD,
its management and development Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
e State shall recognize and promote all the rights of indigenous
Activities with IP
Cooperatives
Ancestral Domain Sustainable Development and 11. Ancestral Domain
Protection Plan (ADSDPP) Defense System
(Kitchen)
III. 11 Building Blocks of a Resilient, Responsive and Relevant ICCs/IPs Ancestral Domains
5. ADSDPP Formulation & Institutionalization (All Bureaus);
1. Confirmation of IPS
a. Is the ADSDPP already formulated? What year? Who financed? 2. Registration &
b. If more than 5 years already, what has it accomplished? Why? Accreditation of IPO
c. How was it institutionalized and operationalized? 3. CADT/CALT Delineation
d. Any plans to update the ADSDPP? When? Process
e. If not yet crafted, why? When is the plan to be crafted? Why? 4. Establishment of ADMO
5.5.ADSDPP Formulation
ADSDPP Formulation
6. IP Wealth Management-
CRMDP Formulation;
7. Institutionalization of CP:
FPIC & EPR
8. Effective IPMR in the
Local Legislative Bodies
9. Efficient & Enhanced
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Ancestral Domain Sustainable Development and Cooperatives
Protection Plan (ADSDPP) 11. Ancestral Domain
Defense System
(Kitchen)
III. 11 Building Blocks of a Resilient, Responsive and Relevant ICCs/IPs Ancestral Domains
IPRA Provision Guidelines, Policies, SOPs Implications 1. Confirmation of IPS
a. Section 7 (b) Right to Administrative Order No. 3, S. Positive Implications (if acted): 2. Registration &
Develop Lands and 2012 (The Revised Guidelines a. As a social justice measure, its implementation will Accreditation of IPO
ensure proper management, development,  and
Natural Resources. on FPIC and Related utilization of the resources to benefit not only the
3. CADT/CALT Delineation
b. SEC. 17. Right to Processes), ADSDPP present generation but also the generations to Process
Determine and Guidelines; but on-going effort to come. 4. Establishment of ADMO
Decide Priorities for draft separate guidelines Negative Implications (if not acted): 5. ADSDPP Formulation
Development. b. The CRDP’s non-formulation could result to a lack of a
clear plan through which funds and resources are 6. 6.IP IP Wealth Management-
Wealth
CRMDP Formulation;
allocated and disbursed. The scenario poses the
danger of the funds and other resources being utilized
Management - CRMDP
7. Institutionalization of CP:
Inside viewresults to non- FPIC & EPR
by a few individuals, which ultimately Formulation;
enjoyment by the IP community as a whole. The same 8. Effective IPMR in the
will also lead to the lack of transparency and Local Legislative Bodies
accountability on the part of the IPOs and the NCIP
will experience difficulty in monitoring the financial
9. Efficient & Enhanced
aspect flowing from royalties, funds, benefits and MOA/MOU/MOC
other resources pursuant to the Office’s mandate to Formulation
protect the well-being and promote the rights of 10. Socio-Economic
ICCs/IPs. Activities with IP
Cooperatives
Community Resource Management Development Plan 11. Ancestral Domain
(CRMDP) Defense System
(Living Room)
III. 11 Building Blocks of a Resilient, Responsive and Relevant ICCs/IPs Ancestral Domains

6. CMRDP Institutionalization (OSESSC/OEHR/LAO/ADO); 1. Confirmation of IPS

a. Are members of the community understand the need of a CMRDP; 2. Registration &
b. Does the community drafted already the general local guidelines and/or detailed Accreditation of IPO
CMRDP for a particular project; 3. CADT/CALT Delineation
Process
c. What are the features inside the CMRDP? 4. Establishment of ADMO
d. Does it parallel or comply to the National guidelines and operationalization with 5. ADSDPP Formulation
consideration to customary practices; 6. 6.IP IP Wealth Management-
Wealth
e. If there is no CMRDP yet and community bank account, when will they do it? CRMDP Formulation;
Management - CRMDP
7. Institutionalization of CP:
Inside view FPIC & EPR
Formulation;
8. Effective IPMR in the
Local Legislative Bodies
9. Efficient & Enhanced
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Community Resource Management Development Plan Cooperatives
11. Ancestral Domain
(CRMDP) Defense System
(Living Room)
III. 11 Building Blocks of a Resilient, Responsive and Relevant ICCs/IPs Ancestral Domains
IPRA Provision Guidelines, Policies, SOPs Implications
1. Confirmation of IPS
a. Section 7 (b) Right to Administrative Order No. 3, S. Positive Implications (if acted):
a. Its implementation will amplify the statutory provisions on the ICCs/IPs’ 2. Registration &
Develop Lands and 2012 (The Revised Guidelines
exercise of their rights to their ancestral domains/lands, social justice Accreditation of IPO
Natural Resources. on FPIC and Related and human rights, self-governance and empowerment, and cultural 3. CADT/CALT Delineation
b. Section 7 (c) Right to Processes) & Guidelines on integrity.
Stay in the Territories. EPR b. Recognition of their right to an informed and intelligent participation in
Process
c. SEC. 32. Community the formulation and implementation of any project, government or 4. Establishment of ADMO
Intellectual Rights. private, that will affect or impact upon the AD and to receive just and fair 5. ADSDPP Formulation
d. SEC. 35. Access to
compensation for any damages 6. IP Wealth Management-
c. Recognition of ICCs/IPs priority rights in the harvesting, extraction,
Biological and Genetic development or exploitation of natural resources within the AD.
CRMDP Formulation;
Resources. Negative Implications (if not acted): 7. Institutionalization ofofCP:
7. Institutionalization
e. SEC. 57. Natural d. Violation of the right to FPIC is a violation of right to ownership of their AD FPIC & EPR
and right to develop their lands and resources. It may also lead Certificate Precondition:
8. Effective IPMR in the
Resources within
FPIC &Local
EPRLegislative Bodies
to increased introduction and implementation of programs, projects and
Ancestral Domains. activities that may not be beneficial to the ICCs/IPs and their ADs.
f. SEC. 58. e. Programs, projects and activities, and resource utilization and extraction 9. Efficient & Enhanced
Environmental will only be for the benefit of the other interested groups  MOA/MOU/MOC
Considerations. f. IP community members will individually approach investors to offer their Formulation
resources
g. SEC. 59. Certification 10. Socio-Economic
Precondition. Activities with IP
Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC)
Cooperatives
(Gate) 11. Ancestral Domain
Exercise of Priority Rights (EPR) Defense System

(Stairs)
III. 11 Building Blocks of a Resilient, Responsive and Relevant ICCs/IPs Ancestral Domains

7. FPIC/EPR Institutionalization (ADO/LAO/OSESSC); 1. Confirmation of IPS

a. Is the FPIC & EPR Process clearly understood by all members of the community? 2. Registration &
b. How many FPIC & EPR processes had been undertaken already in the community; Accreditation of IPO
3. CADT/CALT Delineation
c. What are the impacts of these processes to the well being of these community; Process
d. Who are those proponents and individuals who did not not submit to the FPIC 4. Establishment of ADMO
process? When and Why? Action/s of NCIP, Community & LGUs? 5. ADSDPP Formulation
6. IP Wealth Management-
CRMDP Formulation;
7. Institutionalization ofofCP:
7. Institutionalization
FPIC & EPR
Certificate Precondition:
8. Effective IPMR in the
FPIC &Local
EPRLegislative Bodies
9. Efficient & Enhanced
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) 10. Socio-Economic
(Gate) Activities with IP
Cooperatives
Exercise of Priority Rights (EPR) 11. Ancestral Domain
Defense System
(Stairs)
III. 11 Building Blocks of a Resilient, Responsive and Relevant ICCs/IPs Ancestral Domains
IPRA Provision Guidelines, Policies, SOPs
a. SEC. 16. Right to a. Administrative Order No. 3,
Participate in S. 2018 (Revised National
Decision-Making Guidelines for the
b. IRR : Sec 6, Mandatory Representation
of Indigenous Peoples in
Local Legislative Councils
and Policy-making Bodies)
b. Guidelines on IPMR  in decision-making; there may be difficulty to
Indigenous Peoples Mandatory Representation (IPMR)
Implications
Positive Implications (if acted): 1. Confirmation of IPS
a. Recognition of the right to participate in 2. Registration &
decision-making, if ICCs/IPs so choose; Accreditation of IPO
b. Ensures the empowerment of the ICCs/IPs 3. CADT/CALT Delineation
by enabling them to participate fully in all Process
levels of decision making.
Negative Implications (if not acted): 4. Establishment of ADMO
c. Violation of the right of ICCs/IPs to participate 5. ADSDPP Formulation
6. IP Wealth Management-
raise ICCs/IPs concerns that need to be CRMDP Formulation;
addressed by local government unit policy and 7. Institutionalization of CP:
decision making bodies.
d. Collective right to representation will be lost
FPIC & EPR
and everything will soon be politicized 8. Effective IPMR in the
e. Politicians will take control and the essence of 8. Effective
Local IPMR in the
Legislative Bodies
the IP representation will be bastardized 9. Efficient & Enhanced
f. Affects IP genuine participation in the Local Legislative
MOA/MOU/MOC Bodies;
formulation,  implementations and evaluation Formulation
of plans,  policies programs for national,
regional and local developments which may 10. Socio-Economic
affects their lives,  beliefs, institutions, spiritual Activities with IP
well-being and to the land they own, occupy Cooperatives
and use  11. Ancestral Domain
Defense System
III. 11 Building Blocks of a Resilient, Responsive and Relevant ICCs/IPs Ancestral Domains
8. IPMR Selection and Institutionalization (OEHR/LAO/OECH);
1. Confirmation of IPS
a. Are all IP communities deserving to have IPMRs in the Barangays, City/Municipal & 2. Registration &
Provincial have/has already? Accreditation of IPO
b. Are there questions and protest in the selection process?; 3. CADT/CALT Delineation
c. Are there questions and protest in the crafting of the local guidelines? Who are the Process
signatories? How was it crafted & the parties involved? 4. Establishment of ADMO
5. ADSDPP Formulation
d. How was the protest handled before confirming the candidate?; 6. IP Wealth Management-
e. Does all selection process have corresponding and documented local guidelines CRMDP Formulation;
properly signed?; 7. Institutionalization of CP:
f. If with no IPMRs yet, what is the plan of NCIP & the community?; FPIC & EPR
8. Effective IPMR in the
8. Effective
Local IPMR in the
Legislative Bodies
9. Efficient & Enhanced
Local Legislative
MOA/MOU/MOC Bodies;
Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Cooperatives
Indigenous Peoples Mandatory Representation (IPMR) 11. Ancestral Domain
Defense System
III. 11 Building Blocks of a Resilient, Responsive and Relevant ICCs/IPs Ancestral Domains
IPRA Provision Guidelines, Policies, SOPs Implications
1. Confirmation of IPS
a. Section 7 (b) Right to Administrative Order No. 3, S. Positive Implications (if acted): 2. Registration &
Develop Lands and 2012 (The Revised Guidelines a. Recognition of the ICCs/IPs right to
Natural Resources.
Accreditation of IPO
on FPIC and Related ownership of AD; 3. CADT/CALT Delineation
b. Section 7 (c) Right to
Processes) b. Recognition to benefit and share the Process
Stay in the Territories.
c. SEC. 32. Community profits from allocation and utilization of 4. Establishment of ADMO
Intellectual Rights. the resources found in the AD 5. ADSDPP Formulation
d. SEC. 35. Access to c. Recognition of the right to negotiate the
6. IP Wealth Management-
Biological and Genetic terms and conditions for the use of the
Resources. CRMDP Formulation;
AD and the resources therein
e. SEC. 57. Natural 7. Institutionalization of CP:
Resources within Negative Implications (if not acted):
FPIC & EPR
Ancestral Domains.
d. Disparity in protection and benefits due to 8. Effective IPMR in the
f. SEC. 58. Local Legislative Bodies
Environmental ICCs/IPs;
e. Non-compliance with FPIC requirements. 9. Efficient&&Enhanced
9. Efficient Enhanced
Considerations.
g. SEC. 59. Certification MOA/MOU/MOC
Precondition. MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Cooperatives
11. Ancestral Domain
MOA/MOU/MOC Defense System
Community, Investors, Government Agencies & NCIP
III. 11 Building Blocks of a Resilient, Responsive and Relevant ICCs/IPs Ancestral Domains
9. MOA/MOU/MOC
IPRA Provision Institutionalization (ADO/LAO/OSESSC/OEHR/OECH);
Guidelines, Policies, SOPs Implications
1. Confirmation of IPS
a. Is the community see the value and importance of having an MOU, MOA & MOC 2. Registration &
when entering into a agreement? Accreditation of IPO
b. If no, Why? What actions to be done by NCIP? Community? 3. CADT/CALT Delineation
c. Are there groups inside and outside the community who tends to corrupt the MOA Process
4. Establishment of ADMO
Formulation process? Why? Our actions taken? And community action? 5. ADSDPP Formulation
d. How many MOAs, MOUs & MOC was entered by the Community: Without the 6. IP Wealth Management-
knowledge of NCIP and what are these? and with the participation of NCIP & what are CRMDP Formulation;
these?; 7. Institutionalization of CP:
FPIC & EPR
8. Effective IPMR in the
Local Legislative Bodies
9. Efficient&&Enhanced
9. Efficient Enhanced
MOA/MOU/MOC
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Cooperatives
11. Ancestral Domain
MOA/MOU/MOC Defense System
Community, Investors, Government Agencies & NCIP
III. 11 Building Blocks of a Resilient, Responsive and Relevant ICCs/IPs Ancestral Domains
IPRA Provision Guidelines, Policies, SOPs Implications
1. Confirmation of IPS
a. SEC. 25. Basic Guidelines: Joint CDA-NCIP
Positive Implications (if acted): 2. Registration &
Services. Memo Circular No. 1, S. 2018:
a. Immediate and effective delivery of services Accreditation of IPO
b. SEC. 36. Sustainable Guidelines Governing to ICCs/IPs
Promotion, Organization,
3. CADT/CALT Delineation
Agro-Technical b. Indigenous concept of corporativism is
Registration, Development and
Process
Development. encouraged and recognized
Regulation of Cooperatives to 4. Establishment of ADMO
c. Sec 7-b, sec 46-d Negative Implications (if not acted):
be Established by ICCs/IPs 5. ADSDPP Formulation
(mandate of osessc) c. Non-compliance with State obligation to
sec 25 guarantee the right of ICCs/IPs to basic services
6. IP Wealth Management-
and ensure the continuing improvement of their CRMDP Formulation;
economic and social conditions, as well as the 7. Institutionalization of CP:
State’s obligation to ensure successful FPIC & EPR
sustainable development of ICCs/IPs. 8. Effective IPMR in the
d. Basic services and economic activities will be Local Legislative Bodies
left to the determination of other agencies, 9. Efficient & Enhanced
NGOs and individuals with attached interest  MOA/MOU/MOC
e. CADT alone cannot protect and prevent the IPs Formulation
from selling land to non IP 10.10.Socio-Economic
Socio-Economic
Activities
Activities withwith
IP IP
Cooperatives
Government Socio-Economic Works Cooperatives;
11. Ancestral Domain
Defense System
III. 11 Building Blocks of a Resilient, Responsive and Relevant ICCs/IPs Ancestral Domains
10. IP Cooperative & Socio-economic works Institutionalization (All Bureaus);
1. Confirmation of IPS
a. Is there an existing community wide cooperative? If yes, is the structure effective and 2. Registration &
functional? If no, Why? What are the plans to enhance the same? Accreditation of IPO
b. If there is no cooperative, what is the set-up done by the community to accomplish 3. CADT/CALT Delineation
the same objective/s? Is it functional and effective? Process
c. What are the existing socio-economic programs in the AD?; 4. Establishment of ADMO
5. ADSDPP Formulation
d. Any incoming socio-economic programs? Agencies involved?; 6. IP Wealth Management-
e. Are the communities have existing correspondence with government agencies? How CRMDP Formulation;
does NCIP come into the picture in helping out in the linkaging & networking with 7. Institutionalization of CP:
agencies & even private/public sector?; FPIC & EPR
f. Is there any problem encountered? 8. Effective IPMR in the
Local Legislative Bodies
g. What are the opportunities available to advance the collaboration between the 9. Efficient & Enhanced
communities and agencies of government?; MOA/MOU/MOC
h. Have we let the community leaders engage CDA to be trained on Cooperative Formulation
Movement? 10.10.Socio-Economic
Socio-Economic
Activities
Activities withwith
IP IP
Cooperatives
Government Socio-Economic Works Cooperatives;
11. Ancestral Domain
Defense System
III. 11 Building Blocks of a Resilient, Responsive and Relevant ICCs/IPs Ancestral Domains

IPRA Provision Guidelines, Policies, SOPs Implications 1. Confirmation of IPS

a. Section 3 (e) Communal
Guidelines: on-going Positive Implications (if acted): 2. Registration &
Claims a. The establishment of an Ancestral
development of guidelines
b. Section 3 (f) Customary Accreditation of IPO
Laws a. Framework in Securing the Domains Defense System will help the 3. CADT/CALT Delineation
c. Section 3i: Indigenous ICCs/IPs in regulating the entry of
Political Structures Land migrants and will help prevent the Process
d. Section 7 (h): Right to
b. Framework in Securing the 4. Establishment of ADMO
Resolve Conflict degradation of their culture, customs and
Protected Areas
e. SEC. 10. Unauthorized and institutions. 5. ADSDPP Formulation
Unlawful Intrusion.
c. Framework in Securing b. Protection of culture and IKSPs, AD, 6. IP Wealth Management-
f. SEC. 15. Justice System,
Conflict Resolution Cultural Integrity and indigenous political structures, territory CRMDP Formulation;
Institutions, and Peace
Customary Laws and environment 7. Institutionalization of CP:
Building Processes. Negative Implications (if not acted):
d. Framework in Securing the
g. SEC. 29. Protection of FPIC & EPR
Indigenous Culture, Leaders and its c. The non-establishment thereof will weaken
Traditions, and Institutions. the IPS of the ICCs/IPs and could lead to 8. Effective IPMR in the
Communities
h. SEC. 63. Applicable Laws. infiltration by leftist groups and other Local Legislative Bodies
e. Framework on preventing
i. SEC. 65. Primacy of opportunistic individuals and/or groups. 9. Efficient & Enhanced
Customary Laws and
the radicalization and the d. IP defense system is one of the many
Practices. MOA/MOU/MOC
entry of Foreign ideology systems under an indigenous institutions
that stood for centuries. Doing nothing
Formulation
that will destroy the Culture
Defense System
f. Framework in about this will result to: uncontrolled 10. Socio-Economic
intrusion to the ancestral domains & Activities with IP
(Fence) disseminating instructions
and policies of the unregulated utilization of resources by Cooperatives
outsiders  11. Ancestral Domain
Bagani
Leadership 11. Ancestral Domain
Defense System
Defense System
III. 11 Building Blocks of a Resilient, Responsive and Relevant ICCs/IPs Ancestral Domains
11. Ancestral Domain Defense and Security (ADDS) Institutionalization
1. Confirmation of IPS
(OEHR/OECH/LAO/ADO); 2. Registration &
a. Does the community appreciate and understand the ADDS that we are talking about? Accreditation of IPO
Are we of the same page or are we both aligned? If no, what actions are we doing? 3. CADT/CALT Delineation
b. Is there an existing ADDS framework in the community back up by their customary Process
practices? If yes, when it was set-up?; 4. Establishment of ADMO
5. ADSDPP Formulation
c. Have we documented the customary practices on “Securing the Ancestral Domain 6. IP Wealth Management-
and Enforcing the Customary laws and decision of the Elders?; CRMDP Formulation;
d. Have the community already engage the LGUs, PNP & AFP re community defense & 7. Institutionalization of CP:
security? If yes, what have been discussed and when? If it’s no, what are the plans?; FPIC & EPR
8. Effective IPMR in the
Local Legislative Bodies
9. Efficient & Enhanced
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
Defense System 10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
(Fence) Cooperatives
11. Ancestral Domain
Bagani 11. Ancestral Domain
Defense System
Defense System
III. 11 Building Blocks of a Resilient, Responsive and Relevant ICCs/IPs Ancestral Domains

In general, if the 11 blocks are not implemented 1. Confirmation of IPS

2. Registration &
properly NCIP's reason to exist will cease & the IPs Accreditation of IPO
lives,  beliefs, institutions, spiritual well-being and the 3. CADT/CALT Delineation
lands they own,  occupy and use will negatively Process
4. Establishment of ADMO
be affected. 5. ADSDPP Formulation
6. IP Wealth Management-
Support in the implementation of the 11 building CRMDP Formulation;
blocks will bring to fruition the purpose of the 7. Institutionalization of CP:
FPIC & EPR
enactment of the IPRA-correcting historical injustice 8. Effective IPMR in the
and the recognition, respect, protection and Local Legislative Bodies
promotion of ICC/IP rights 9. Efficient & Enhanced
MOA/MOU/MOC
It also emphasizes that ADs are privately owned by Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
ICCs/IPs and cannot be sold, disposed or destroyed, Activities with IP
and that ICCs/IPs have the right to manage the same Cooperatives
11. Ancestral Domain
in accordance with their customs, traditions and Defense System
institutions.
III. 11 Building Blocks of a Resilient, Responsive and Relevant ICCs/IPs Ancestral Domains

1. Confirmation of IPS
2. Registration &
Accreditation of IPO
3. CADT/CALT Delineation
Process
4. Establishment of ADMO
Customary Laws Practices, Culture 5. ADSDPP Formulation
6. IP Wealth Management-
and Beliefs are instruments in CRMDP Formulation;
7. Institutionalization of CP:
Operationalizing the 11 Building FPIC & EPR
8. Effective IPMR in the
Blocks Local Legislative Bodies
9. Efficient & Enhanced
MOA/MOU/MOC
Formulation
10. Socio-Economic
Activities with IP
Cooperatives
11. Ancestral Domain
Defense System
IV. Ancestral Domains Profile and Other Significant Undertakings

LEGEND
Estimated 1,539 ancestral 11 Building Blocks
domains nationwide
covering 13,333,384 has. 34 1. IPS
1,180 2. IPO
equivalent to 44.44% of
257/251 3. CADT/CALT
30M has. PH land area 1 4. ADMO
274 5. ADSDPP
CADTs 6. CRMDP
11
966 – Total ADs
257 – Approved 448 7. FPIC & EPR
224 – On-process 5,367 8. IPMR
IPS = 13% 9. MOA/MOU/MOC
485 – For Engagement 461
IPO = 70%
CALTs 235 10.Socio-Economic
CADT = 27%
573 – Total ALs Areas Activities with IP
ADMO = 0.1%
251 – Approved
ADSDPP = 28% Cooperatives
177 – On-process
CRMDP = 4% 2 11. Ancestral Domain
145 – For Engagement
ADDS = 0.78% Defense System
ANCESTRAL DOMAINS ARE NOT FOR SALE!!!

Pursuant to Section 5, RA 8371 the indigenous concept of

ownership sustains the view that ancestral domains and all
resources found therein shall serve as the material bases of their
cultural integrity. The indigenous concept of ownership generally
holds that ancestral domains are the ICC's/IP's private but
community property which belongs to all generations and therefore
cannot be sold, disposed or destroyed. It likewise covers
sustainable traditional resource rights.
NCIP National Advisory No. NA-2020-08-001, S. 2020
End of Presentation