You are on page 1of 25

Defensa Título Profesional:

Profesor de Inglés para Enseñanza


Básica y Media
Assessment
How instructions impact in
students results'

Felipe Thoms Arredondo


Context Colegio Providencia

Kinder 40
to students
8th grade per
classroom

Integral &
inclusive IVE 53%
approach
Context 2nd A & C Grade

2°A 2°C
● SEN,foreign and ● Variety of students
vulnerable students ● Talkative
● Contains a ● Pay attention
differential educator ● low attendance in
and an assistant the subject
● Talkative ● Contains a classroom
● Participants assistant
Problems observed

Unorthodox practices
Knowledge - Performance
Inconsistency
Marks modification for classroom
management
Justification

Provide guidance to the Modality Principle:


Establish clear, precise student. Teachers can People learn more deeply
and specific instructions provide detailed rubrics or from pictures and spoken
for students, to achieve give clear instructions on words than from pictures
the objectives. the expectations for the and printed words.
(Bloom,1977)
learning context. . (Mayer, R. 2009)
(Gagné,1965)
Instruments

Six students from


2nd Grade

Survey

Six questions with


Suvey provides
“Si, No o Aveces”
specific answers
answers
Instruments
Analysis and results
Results
Results
Results
Results
Results
Results
Diagnosis

Students needs
Assessment
a guide when Performance
instruments do
they are aware depends on
not have clear
that knowledge instructions
instructions.
will be graded.
Implementation Plan
Objectives Actions

● Understand
basic ● Provide different
commands and manners of
instructions instruction
● Increase visual representation
weight and ● Simplify
decrease visual instructions
noise
Results: Marks 2°A

Low
Score

Absent
Results: Marks 2°A

Low
Score

Absent
Results: Marks 2°C

Low
Score

Absent
Results: Marks 2°C

Low
Score

Absent
Conclusions

Classroom The teacher has the


Cognitive Instruction That control of
load Works: Research- demonstrate
Based Strategies for students knowledge
theory Increasing Student through instructions
(Sweller, J. Achievement(Marza (Impact on students
no, R.J. 2001) performance
1988)
References
Avila, A. (2018, 18 febrero). 11 Principios de Aprendizaje Multimedia. Alejandra

Ávila. https://www.alejandraavila.com/11-principios-de-aprendizaje-

multimedia/

Bloom, B. S. (1977). Taxonomía de los objetivos de la educación: la

clasificación de la metas educacionales.

La teoría de la carga cognitiva de John Sweller. (2020, 27 octubre).

https://psicologiaymente.com/psicologia/teoria-carga-cognitiva-john-sweller
References
Libretexts. (2022). 6.2: Robert Gagné y el diseño sistemático de la instrucción. LibreTexts

Español.

https://espanol.libretexts.org/Ciencias_Sociales/Educacion_y_Desarrollo_Profesional/

Diseno_para_el_aprendizaje

%3A_principios_procesos_y_praxis_(McDonald_y_West)/

02%3A_Conocimientos_de_Dise%C3%B1o_Instruccional/06%3A_Procesos_de_Dise

%C3%B1o_Instruccional/6.02%3A_Robert_Gagn%C3%A9_y_el_dise

%C3%B1o_sistem%C3%A1tico_de_la_instrucci%C3%B3n

Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom Instruction that Works:

Research-based Strategies for Increasing Student Achievement. ASCD.


Questions from the Committee

You might also like