Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • How They Made Comparisons Guide Questions

    Uploaded by

    Seth Holden Diesmos
    6 views4 pages
    The authors made comparisons in the following ways: 1. They analyzed developmental states in Northeast and Southeast Asia using a comparative perspective to understand systemic vulnerabilities and the origins of developmental states. 2. They compared the political economies of developmental states in South Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore to understand how these states developed. 3. They conducted a comparative analysis of the Chinese and Japanese models of economic development to examine neoliberal and classical developmentalism approaches. 4. They compared how South Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore survived growth-led conflicts at critical junctures in their development.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    How-They-Made-Comparisons-Guide-Questions

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The authors made comparisons in the following ways: 1. They analyzed developmental states in Northeast and Southeast Asia using a comparative perspective to understand systemic vulnerabilities and the origins of developmental states. 2. They compared the political economies of developmental states in South Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore to understand how these states developed. 3. They conducted a comparative analysis of the Chinese and Japanese models of economic development to examine neoliberal and classical developmentalism approaches. 4. They compared how South Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore survived growth-led conflicts at critical junctures in their development.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views4 pages

    How They Made Comparisons Guide Questions

    Uploaded by

    Seth Holden Diesmos
    The authors made comparisons in the following ways: 1. They analyzed developmental states in Northeast and Southeast Asia using a comparative perspective to understand systemic vulnerabilities and the origins of developmental states. 2. They compared the political economies of developmental states in South Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore to understand how these states developed. 3. They conducted a comparative analysis of the Chinese and Japanese models of economic development to examine neoliberal and classical developmentalism approaches. 4. They compared how South Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore survived growth-led conflicts at critical junctures in their development.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 4

    ANALYSIS OF

    COMPARISONS

    How they made comparisons?


    What research problem (question) or objectives
    was(were) the author(s) pursuing in the article?

    Did they state the importance or significance of the


    problem and their study?
    Guide Questions
    What variables framed their study? Identify the
    variables and briefly explain how they are
    operationalized or measured.

    What methodology and methods did they use in their


    study? How did they make comparisons?

    What were the key findings of the article?


    The Articles

    - Doner, Richard F., Ritchie, Bryan K., and Dan Slater (2005). “Systemic Vulnerability and the Origins of Developmental States:
    Northeast and Southeast Asia in Comparative Perspective,” International Organization 59, Spring, pp. 327–361.

    - Tuong Vu (2007). “State Formation and the Origins of Developmental States in South Korea and Indonesia.” Studies in Comparative
    International Development, Winter, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 27-56.

    - Tian He (2016). The Political Economy of Developmental States in East Asia: South Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore. Palgrave
    MacMillan. Chapter 1.

    - Bai Gao (2013). “Neoliberal and Classical Developmentalism: A Comparative Analysis of the Chinese and Japanese Models of
    Economic Development,” Chapter 4 in X. Huang, ed. Modern Economic Development in Japan and China: Developmentalism,
    Capitalism, and the World Economic System. Palgrave MacMillan.
    The Articles Continued

    - Kanchoochat, Veerayooth (2019). “Tigers at Critical Junctures: How South Korea, Taiwan and Singapore Survived Growth-
    Led Conflicts,” Chapter 3 in Yusuke Takagi, Veerayooth Kanchoochat, and Tetsushi Sonobe, Developmental State Building:
    The Politics of Emerging Economies, Singapore: Springer.

    - Quah, J.S.T. (2021), “Breaking the cycle of failure in combating corruption in Asian countries,” Public Administration and
    Policy, Vol. 24, Issue 2, pp. 125-138.

    - --------------- (1999), “Corruption in Asian countries: can it be minimized?” Public Administration Review, Nov/Dec., 59, 6.

    - ----------------(1982), “Bureaucratic Corruption in the ASEAN Countries: A Comparative Analysis of Their Anti-Corruption
    Strategies,” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies , Mar., 1982, Vol. 13, No. 1 (Mar., 1982), pp. 153-177

    You might also like