Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Class PPT 2
Class PPT 2
whereas
Suppose you have to make a device to join the two lego blocks.
How will you do it?
2. Position
1. Grasp
B
A
Generate the single statement of the overall function on the basis of the customer requirements
Lego Lego
position A JOIN TWO LEGO BLOCKS position B
2. Division into finer functional details leads to a better understanding of the design problem.
(Function can be fully understood)
Dividing in
to subfunctions
Lego Lego
Grasp Position Attach
position A position B
Give signal Position the Using external Ensure to hold it Ensure to hold it
to the actuator actuator power move the to just the right to just the right
actuator force force
1 2 3 4 5 6
A problem solving process in which participants are asked to consider outlandish, fantastic
or bizarre solutions which may lead to original or ground breaking ideas
This morning you made a cup of tea or coffee and had your breakfast – the
same as yesterday. But was it? You will never even brush your teeth in
precisely the same way as yesterday. Every minute is unique.
Dr. Abhinav Varshney, MANIT Bhopal
Chance favours only the prepared minds
INVENTIONS INVENTORS
-Edward Gibbon
Keep a notebook to record possible materials for your present or future use:
• ideas,
• a scrap of conversation, Write it down!
• something seen or heard on television or radio,
• a quotation from an article or book, When you write, you think!
• an observation,
• a proverb.
‘A man would do well to carry a pencil in his pocket, and write down the
thoughts of the moment.
Those that come unsought are commonly the most valuable and should be
secured, because they seldom return’
-Francis Bacon
Dr. Abhinav Varshney, MANIT Bhopal
BRAINSTORMING
• Do not allow evaluation of ideas; just the generation of them. Ignore any evaluation, judgement
or other comments on the value of an idea
It has been found that the first 10 or so ideas will not be the most fresh and
creative, so it is critical to get at least 30 to 40 ideas from your session
Dr. Abhinav Varshney, MANIT Bhopal
SCAMPER CHECKLIST
Proposed Change Description
S Substitute What if used in a different material, process, person, power source,
place, or approach?
C Combine Could I combine units, purposes, or ideas?
A Adapt What else is like this? What other idea does it suggest? Does the past
offer a parallel solution?
M Modify, magnify, minify Could I add a new twist? Could I change the meaning, color, motion,
form, or shape? Could I add something?
P Put to other uses Are there new ways to use this as is? If I modify it, does it have other
uses?
E Eliminate Can I remove a part, function, person without affecting outcome?
R Rearrange, reverse Could I interchange components? Could I use a different layout or
sequence? What if I transpose cause and effect?
The SCAMPER questions are generalized, they sometimes will not apply to a specific technical problem.
Therefore, if a question fails to evoke ideas, move on quickly to the next question.
Dr. Abhinav Varshney, MANIT Bhopal
What after Brainstorming?
10
9
7
8
6
Arrive at ideas that are
5
Converge physically realizable/feasible
4
3
1 2
2
1 Ideas that 3
Ideas that may have potential Ideas that
are feasible after more thought are unfeasible*
or research are applied
1Each member takes a clean sheet of paper and divides it in to three column and number
of rows equal to number of participants.
2 Each team member writes 3 ideas for the problem in the topmost row.
(Ideas can be sketched or written, they must be clear enough and others may understand
the important aspects of the concepts.)
3 After 5 minutes of work on the concepts, the sheets of paper are passed to the right.
The team members now have another 5 minutes to add 3 more ideas inspired by the
previous idea(s) on the sheet.
4 Repeat step 3 until every member has written in all the sheets
5 Review all the generated ideas and cluster them. Vote for the best.
Dr. Abhinav Varshney, MANIT Bhopal
Template for 6-3-5 method
Round 1 Round 1 Round 1
2. A company “ PIKE” has to increase its sale. It produces sports shoes and
want to increase its reach to every age people. What might the company
do to increase the value of their product and increase its reach?
Possible Variants
PIKE Tivia Jhankaar Beats Road Master LMN Publications
sports shoe Sports equipments Musical Instruments Cycles Books
Dr. Abhinav Varshney, MANIT Bhopal
Who are my customers/users/stakeholders?
Secondary User
Tertiary User
Dr. Abhinav Varshney, MANIT Bhopal
What does the customer want?
The research on customer needs for a particular product or for the development of a
new product is done using a number of formal methods.
If a person is reflective, is a good listener, thinks and then speaks, and enjoys solving
problems alone, then she is an internal problem solver.
If the person’s energy comes from outside through interactions with others (i.e., the
person is sociable and tends to speak and then think) she is an external problem
solver
There is no right or wrong style; this is merely the way people operate.
Dr. Abhinav Varshney, MANIT Bhopal
In team settings both internals and externals have characteristics that are
overwhelm (overcome) the internals, who are reluctant (hesitant) to share their
ideas.
People who prefer facts and details are literal, practical, and realistic;
they appreciate the here and now.
Those who think in terms of possibilities, patterns, concepts, and
theories are looking for relationships between pieces of information
and the meaning of the information.
When you are working alone, the language you use is not an important
consideration. In teams, however, the preferred languages greatly affect the
development of a shared vision of the problem and alternative solutions
Dr. Abhinav Varshney, MANIT Bhopal
4. Deliberation style or accommodation
Way by which you tend to solve the problem
• Objectivity
• Subjectivity
Conversely, team members who are logical, detached, and analytical take an
objective approach to problems
If a person goes with the flow; is flexible, adaptive, and spontaneous; and
finds it difficult to make and stick with decisions, he is considered
flexible.
If, on the other hand, he makes decisions with a minimum of stress and likes
an environment that is ordered, scheduled, controlled, and deliberate,
then he is decisive.
Dr. Abhinav Varshney, MANIT Bhopal
Design Thinking
Some thing wrong with these door??
What’s wrong with these Switch Boards?
Do you face problem in changing Gear in your car?
What about these?
Many of the rules followed by
the machines are known only People often fail to Machine does the
by the machine and its follow these secret rules wrong thing
designers!!
• Technology Limitations
• Self imposed restrictions by the designers
• Incomplete understanding of human-machine interaction
What Engineers think!!
If only people
We are people
would read
ourselves, so
instructions,
we understand
everything
people!!
would be alright
People
What is the Solution??
• Engineers and business people are trained to solve problems. Why would anyone
• The real world is not like the university. In the university, artificial problems are
formulated. In the real world, the problems do not come in nice, neat packages.
It is all too easy to see only the surface problems and never dig
• Technology
• Competitive pressures
• Aesthetics
• Limits of technological possibilities
• Range of imagination, of society, of art or fashion
• Emphasize reliability, cost, and efficiency.
Human-Centered design ensures that the result fits human desires, needs,
and capabilities.
After all, why do we make products? We make them for people to use.
Good designers never start by trying to solve the problem given to them:
they start by trying to understand what the real issues are. As a
result, rather than converge upon a solution, they diverge, studying
people and what they are trying to accomplish, generating idea after idea
after idea.
Two phases of Design Thinking
Problem Phase Solution Phase
Resist the temptation to jump immediately Instead of solving that problem, consider a wide
Source:
http://www.lcahoust
on.com/2014/04/cy
nthia-koenig-wello-
water/
Difference between conventional design
approach and design thinking approach
Conventional Design approach Design Thinking approach
Focused on the needs of the business Focused on the needs of the user
Conventional Design approach Design Thinking approach
Well suited to well-defined Well suited to ill-defined or complex
technical problems human problems
1. Fabricate a 4 speed gear box for changing 1. Make a computer controlled chuck with
chuck speed of lath machine continuous variation in speed.
2. Make a bottle for drinking water 2. Make a bottle for drinking water for
Indian Army Jawans
Conventional Design approach Design Thinking approach
It’s about efficiency It’s about innovation
For many older adults, keeping track of when to take medications can be challenging and
time-consuming.
PillPack, an online pharmacy and a former startup-in-residence at IDEO that was
acquired by Amazon, has sought to make the experience easier.
Before starting Moonrise as a new business venture, American Family Insurance worked
with IDEO to uncover the needs of working families. Initially, they thought that people
needed a budgeting tool, but their research began to show that people instead wanted a
way to create a financial cushion from extra income. The team then tested a pilot with 11
Moonrisers, 6 employers, and a group of designers and programmers to create an efficient
service. Since Moonrise launched in 2018, more than 7,000 people have applied to
become Moonrisers, and they have earned more than $500,000.