Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 st
Wolkite
Mechanica
University
l
engineerin
Mathematical modeling for
thermo-mechanical stress field
g seminar
associated with a propagating
on
crack
in homogenous isotropic
Haile S. Walie (MSc.), Wolkite University
materials
Addis A. Kidane (Ph.D.), University of
Contents of the
presentation
Introduction 01 04 Methodology
06 Conclusion
Objectives 03
07 Limitation
01
1. Introduction
The ultimate goal of applied solid mechanics is to be able to design
structures
Fracture mechanics is a field of solid mechanics deals with cracked body.
Fracture is common in the engineering system that is operated with high
temperatures.
many researchers and authors, to Estimate the maximum crack size that
a material can sustain safely, to relate the crack size to the applied
load, to know the amount of the critical load, to extend a crack of
known size, to know the crack extension behavior is stable or unstable
according to the applied load.
Some of the investigations developed the stress field equations.
(Kidane, Chalivendra and Shukla, 2010).
02
2. Statement of the
In literature
Problem
(Kidane et al., 2010) utilized the asymptotic
approach for the solution of the 2D steady state temperature field
to be singular at the crack tip like the mechanical stress, but this
is not attainable in the real world scenario.
2
𝜕 𝜙 𝜕 𝜙
2
2
( 3 𝛿+ 2 )
𝛼 𝑙 + −𝛼 𝑇 =0
𝜕𝑥
2
𝜕𝑦
2
𝛿+ 2
2 2
2 𝜕 𝜓 𝜕 𝜓
𝛼𝑠 2
+ 2
=0 03
𝜕𝑥 𝜕 𝑦
3. Objectives
Mathematical modeling of the
thermo-mechanical stress field
associated with a propagating crack
in homogenous isotropic materials
05
Cont.
Homogenizing and super positioning
¿ 𝑻 ( 𝒙 , 𝟎 )= 𝒇 𝟏 ( 𝒙 )
¿ 𝑻 ( 𝒙 , 𝒃 )= 𝒇 𝟐 ( 𝒙 )
𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝟎< 𝒙 < 𝒂 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝟎< 𝒚 < 𝒃
¿ 𝑻 ( 𝟎 , 𝒚 )=𝒈𝟏 ( 𝒚 ) 06
¿ 𝑻 ( 𝒂 , 𝒚 )=𝒈𝟐 ( 𝒚 )
Cont.
Then the complete solution for for the non-homogeneous
boundary condition is;
𝑇 ( 𝑥 , 𝑦 )=𝑇 𝐴 ( 𝑥 , 𝑦 ) + 𝑇 𝐵 ( 𝑥 , 𝑦 ) +𝑇 𝐶 ( 𝑥 , 𝑦 ) +𝑇 𝐷 ( 𝑥 , 𝑦 )
( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )( )
∞ ∞ ∞ ∞
𝑛𝜋 𝑛𝜋 𝑛 𝜋 𝑛𝜋 𝑛 𝜋 𝑛 𝜋
¿∑ 𝐴𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑛 𝑥 𝑠𝑖𝑛h (𝑏−𝑦) +∑𝐵𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑛(𝜇𝑛𝑥) 𝑖𝑛h𝑠 (𝜇𝑛𝑦)+∑𝐶𝑛 𝑖𝑛h𝑠 (𝑎−𝑥) 𝑠𝑖𝑛 𝑦 +∑𝐷𝑛 𝑖𝑛h𝑠 𝑥 𝑠𝑖𝑛 𝑦
𝑛 =1 𝑎 𝑎 𝑛=1 𝑛=1 𝑏 𝑏 𝑛=1 𝑏
07
𝑏
Cont.
Confirming the solution for the two-dimensional equation whether it satisfies the
boundary condition or not.
Temp Vs Error
5
Average Error In %
4
3
2
1
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Temprature at the three edges ◦c 08
4.2. Applied mechanical stress.
Consider two-dimensional infinitesimal element of width and height and as well
as unit depth into the page.
𝜕 𝜏 𝑥𝑦 𝜕 𝜎 𝑦𝑦 2
𝜕 𝑣
¿ + =𝜌
𝜕𝑥 𝜕𝑦 𝜕𝑡
2
x=X-ct, y=Y, 11
The above conditions of movement can be composed as . (Kidane,
Chalivendra and Shukla, 2010)
2 𝜕
2
𝜙 𝜕
2
𝜙 ( 3 𝛿+ 2 )
𝛼𝑙 + −𝛼 𝑇 =0
𝜕𝑥
2
𝜕𝑦
2
𝛿+ 2
Where, and
12
4.4. Perturbation of temperature fields
The smaller parameter that exists in the asymptotic approach for the
transformation of coordinates from (x, y) to (), as well as in the
general solution principle.
and
And satisfies X(0)=1 and Y(0)=1 as well as X(a)=0 and Y(b)=0.
𝑛 =0
∞
𝑦 , 𝜀 )= ∑ 𝜀 𝑌 𝑛 ( 𝑦 )
𝑛 𝑇 ( 𝑥 , 𝑦 )=𝜀2 𝐴𝑛 𝑠𝑖𝑛 ( 𝑛𝜋
𝑎
𝑎 ) (
𝑥 𝑠𝑖𝑛h
𝑛𝜋
𝑎
( 𝑏− 𝑦 ) )
𝑛=0
𝐴 𝑛=
2
∫ 𝑓 1 ( 𝑥 ) 𝑠𝑖𝑛( 𝑛𝑎𝜋 )
𝑥 𝑑𝑥
13
asinh (𝑛𝜋
𝑎
𝑏 ) 0
epsilon vs error %
centigrade
15
10
5
0
0.88 0.9 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 1 1.02 1.04 1.06 1.08
value of epsilon
( )
∞ 𝑛 +3 ∞
2 𝜕 𝜙
2
𝜕 𝜙 ( 3 2
𝛿+ 2 )
∑𝜀 2
𝛼𝑙 2
+
𝜕𝜂 1 𝜕 𝜂2
2
−𝛼
𝛿+ 2
∑ 𝜀
2𝑛
𝑇 𝑛=0
𝑛 =0 𝑛 =0
( )
∞ 𝑛 +3 2 2
𝜕 𝜓 𝜕 𝜓
∑𝜀 2
𝛼𝑙
2
𝜕𝜂 1
2
+
𝜕 𝜂2
2
=0
14
𝑛 =0
( 𝑛 +3 ) ( 𝑛 +3 )
𝑛 ( 𝜌 𝑙 𝜃 𝑙 ,𝑡 ) = 𝐴𝑚 𝜌 𝑙
2
𝑐𝑜𝑠
1
2 ( )
( 𝑛+3 ) 𝜃𝑙 + 𝐶 𝑛 𝜌 𝑙 2
𝑠𝑖𝑛 ( 1
2
( 𝑛+ 3 ) 𝜃 𝑙 )
( 𝑛+ 3) ( 𝑛+ 3)
𝜓 𝑛 ( 𝜌 𝑠 , 𝜃𝑠 ,𝑡 )= 𝐵𝑛 𝜌 𝑠 2 1
( )
𝑠𝑖𝑛 ( 𝑛+ 3 ) 𝜃 𝑠 + 𝐷𝑛 𝜌 𝑠
2
2
𝑐𝑜𝑠 ( 1
2
( 𝑛+ 3 ) 𝜃 𝑠 )
Where, , , and
, , and are real constants.
1
=( 𝜂 )
2 2 2
1 +𝜂 2
𝜂2
=𝑡𝑎𝑛
𝜂1
15
() () ( )( )
3 3
2 3 3 2 2 (3 𝛿+2)𝑎 2 π π
2
𝜙(𝜌𝑙,𝜃𝑙, 𝜃)=𝐴0𝜌𝑙 𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝜃𝑙 +𝐶0𝜌𝑙 𝑠𝑖𝑛 𝜃𝑙 + 𝐴1 𝜌𝑙 𝑐𝑜𝑠(2 𝜃𝑙)+𝐶1𝜌𝑙 𝑠𝑖𝑛(2𝜃𝑙)− K1 𝑞0 𝜌 𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝜌sin 𝜃 cosh (b−𝜌sin 𝜃)
2 2 (𝛿+2)𝜋 a a
( ) ( )
3 3
3 3
𝜓 ( 𝜌 𝑠 , 𝜃𝑠 ) =𝐵 0 𝜌 𝑠 𝑠𝑖𝑛 𝜃 𝑠 +𝐷0 𝜌 𝑠 2 𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝜃 𝑠 + 𝐵1 𝜌 𝑠2 𝑠𝑖𝑛 ( 2 𝜃 𝑠 ) +𝐷 1 𝜌 𝑠2 𝑐𝑜𝑠 ( 2 𝜃 𝑠 )
2
2 2
Recall the strain and displacement equation
𝜕𝜙 𝜕𝜓
¿ 𝑢= +
𝜕𝑥 𝜕 𝑦
𝜕 𝜙 𝜕𝜓
¿𝑣= −
𝜕 𝑦 𝜕 𝑥
and , the normal strain. And the shear strain is,
16
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) [ ( )( ( )]
5. Result and Discussions
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
σ 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 ( 3 δ + 2 ) a π δπ π π
− − − − − − −
= (2+δ)Ϛ cos θ− δα Ϛ sin θ A−C (2+δ1+α ) Ϛ sin θ+ (2+δ)α Ϛ sin θ+ δα Ϛ cos θ B+ (2+δ)α Ϛ cos θ− δαϚ sin θ D+(4 2δ(1−α ) A+4Dα+2δα(D−B)+4K q cosh (b−y) 1− − sinh (b−y) Ϛsinθ−(2+3δ)αT
x 2
l
22
l ll l0 0
22
ll l
2 2
ss s ss s 0
2 2 2
ss s ss s 0 l 1 1s s 1 1 1 0
𝜇4 24 2 4 2 4 24 2 4 24 2 ( δ + 2) π a a a a
([( ) ) (( ( ) ) (( ) ) (( ) ) ] ( ) ) ( ) [ ( )( ) ( )]
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
σ3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
− −
y 2 222 2 22 2
− − −
2
− −
2 2 22 (3δ+2)a π δπ π π
= δϚ cos θ−2α +δα Ϛ sin θ A − 2α +δ1+α Ϛ sin θ C + 2α+δα Ϛ cos θ+δα Ϛ sin θ B − 2α+δα Ϛ sin θ+δα Ϛ cos θ D +2δ1−α −4α A −4B α+2δα D −B +4K q cosh (b−y) 1− − sinh (b−y) Ϛsinθ−(2+3δ)αT
l l l ll l0 l l l l0 s ss s ss s 0 s s s s ss s 0 l l 1 1s s 1 1 1 0
𝜇4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ( δ +2 ) π a a a a 17
( ) ( ) ( )( )
1 1 1 1
3 1 3 1 1 3 1 3 1 1 (3 δ + 2) a π a
− − − −
= A α Ϛ sin θ+ B Ϛ α cos θ +sin θ + C α Ϛ cos θ+ D Ϛ α sin θ −cos θ +2(α B −D )+4C α −4K cosh (b−y) q0 1+ Ϛcosθ
xy 2
0ll l
22
0s s s
2 22 2
0ll l 0s s s s s 1 1 1l 1
𝜇 2 2 4 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 ( δ +2 ) π a π
s
As the value of varies from 0 to
the value of stress increases from
0 to the maximum value and as
the value of varies from to the
stress decreases and it becomes
below the iso thermal for value of
-2 to -3.14 radians.
18
increases for is in between 0 and
as well as decreases for value of
to .
as the value of varies from 0 to the
value of thermo-mechanical stress,
reveals relatively minimum value
19
6. Conclusion
0 0 0
1 2 3
01 02 03
The research is The assumption of for the in between 2
theoretical and it is not homogeneous and and 3.14 rad and for
the specimen.
21
Thank you!
Haile Addis A.
Simachew Kidane
(MSc.) (P.hD)