Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Canteen Assessment Maysan NHS
Canteen Assessment Maysan NHS
In Partial Fulfillment
Of the Requirements for the Degree
Master of Education
With Specialization in Home Economics
by:
ARLENE B. MANIQUIZ
March 2009
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The
researcher
gratitude,
wishes
acknowledgment
to
and
extend
her
appreciation
profound
to
all
the
she
Lady
for
of
the
Fatima
University,
pressure
the
where
she
administrators
currently
applied
to
iii
All
faculty
members,
Almighty
School,
teaching
cooperation
the
High
of
to
National
non
personnel
Lastly,
Maysan
students,
who
gave
for
her
their
good
iv
DEDICATION
TO MY BELOVED HUSBAND
RODERICK L. MANIQUIZ
MY PRECIOUS
GEMS
MY PARENTS
DOMINGO
DEDICATED
-A.B.M.
ii
ABSTRACT
Title
Key Concepts
Researcher
Arlene B. Maniquiz
Specialization
Home Economics
Adviser
study
administration
Teachers
sought
and
to
assess
operation
Cooperative
at
which
Maysan
the
school
is
managed
National
High
canteen
by
the
School
in
Valenzuela.
Specifically,
the
study
attempted
to
answer
the
following questions.
1. What is the status of the school canteen as
perceived by the student respondents, the faculty,
and the non-teaching personnel in terms of:
1.1
vi
1.2
1.3
assess
1.1.
1.2.
Utilization of Facilities
3.2
3.3
3.4
Prices of commodities
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
vii
METHODOLOGY
The
descriptive
method
was
used
and
gathered
and
policies
National
High
involved
School
in
the
Canteen.
administered
same
questionnaires
to
respondents:
the
students,
faculty
the
the
management
The
three
and
of
researcher
groups
the
of
school
canteen staff.
The Respondents were 100 students 25 from each year
level, 20 faculty members, and 20 non-teaching personnel.
The study was also conducted to determine the effectiveness
of the management skills of the canteen manager.
The
results
observations
of
were
the
analyzed
respondents.
to
determine
Research
data
the
were
viii
FINDINGS
1. The assessment on the effectiveness of the management
of
school
canteen
activities
by
the
respondents
staff
of
the
school
canteen
did
not
properly
mean
value
of
3.09,
for
the
item:
sells
the
student
respondents
and
the
teacher
ix
CONCLUSIONS
1. The most important finding of this study is the need
to provide proper training for canteen staff.
Enough
on
preparation,
through
the
proper
food
effective
handling
selection,
of
customer
interpersonal
food,
food
satisfaction
skills
and
total
of
canteen
managers
to
utilize
equipment
terms
of
price
of
commodities,
students
find
recommended
measures
to
improve
the
management
in
this
study
should
be
adopted
and
implemented.
2. The recruitment policy should be tightened or improved
to ensure that canteen staff and manager possess the
necessary qualifications and competencies specifically
on the knowledge of food handling and food preparation
plus serving a variety of food.
3. Members of the cooperative, especially the head, must
vigorously promote educating the canteen officials and
staff in order to develop and enhance their skills.
xi
Chairs
or
Heads
of
the
Teachers
Cooperative
monitoring
emphasizing
efficiency
and
effectivity.
5. Canteen facilities must be properly utilized in order
to maximize and systematize the use of these
instruments.
6. Commodities must be affordable yet nutritious so that
the clientele will be satisfied.
7. Canteen staff must provide variety of food geared
towards the total well being of the clients.
8. Cooperative
incentives
Officials
or
merits
should
in
provide
whatever
form
xii
some
kind
of
in
order
to
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page..i
Approval Sheetii
Acknowledgment.iii
Dedication.v
Abstractvi
Table of Contentsxiii
List of Tablesxv
List of Appendicesxvi
CHAPTER
I.
II.
III.
xiii
Research Instrument 34
Validation of Instrument 35
Data Gathering Procedure 36
Data Processing and Statistical Treatment 36
IV.
V.
Bibliography67
Appendices69
Curriculum Vitae 94
xiv
LIST OF TABLES
Table
Page
34
39
42
46
48
51
Analysis of Variance of
the Perceptions of the Three Groups of
Respondents on Management of School Canteen
57
58
59
60
61
10
11
xv
Chapter I
THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND
Introduction
The Department of Education is strongly committed to
support student health and well-being through its curriculum
in
schools
and
range
of
initiatives
that
offer
eating
implement
healthy
food.
comprehensive
Schools
health
are
and
encouraged
well-being
to
programs,
in
developing
love
and
interest
in
buying
personnel,
making
it
possible
for
them
to
enjoy
and
dishes
that
enhance
the
skills
and
knowledge
in
children's
growth
and
development,
many
schools
Canteen
operation
can
be
considered
one
of
the
or
hired
private
Although, a classroom
person
often
handles
the
school
administration.
Hence,
greater
effort
must
be
in
school
be
given
food
that
are
nutritious
and
economical.
There are plenty of students with meager allowance for
snacks in the public schools, therefore it is necessary that
daily foods served in the school canteen are assured to be
within the mean of the children. Considerations are given to
the nutritive value of the food items being served to them.
However, there are other factors in the process which are
not given attention which may adversely affect the schools
total development program especially if the canteen is being
managed privately by a group or an individual. Based on the
foregoing, the researcher thinks that there is a need for a
thorough assessment of the program being implemented in the
school.
were
the
teachers
cooperative
following
the
rules
and
about
every
important
decision
about
canteen
selecting
Several
multi-factor
the
manager
criteria
which
rating
by
the
serve
scale
head
as
is
of
basis
being
the
in
used
in
cooperative.
selecting
then
of
manager
and
staff.
The
one
who
is
now
nor
has
she
finished
management
course.
The
other
failure
hand,
on
the
committee
supervision
of
claims
the
said
that
there
is
no
canteen
based
on
it
generated profits.
Aside from mismanagement, the need for facilities is of
great
concern,
services
which
facilities
is
the
are
needed
reason
why
to
provide
customers
quality
keep
on
failed
to
accomplish
its
target
goal
which
is
in
getting
more
complaints
from
the
canteens
clientele.
Statement of the Problem
The study was conducted to make an assessment of the
school canteen which is managed by the Teachers Cooperative
in Maysan National High School during the School Year 20082009 as perceived by the school personnel, teachers, and
students.
Specifically,
the
study
attempted
to
answer
the
following questions.
1. How do the student, teacher, and non-teaching
personnel respondents
assess
terms of:
1.1.
1.2.
Utilization of Facilities
2.2
2.3
3.2
3.3
3.4
Prices of commodities
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
particularly
operation
that
should
identifying
be
improved.
the
aspects
Likewise,
it
in
the
was
the
objective
of
this
study
to
evaluate
the
difficulties
Finally,
opportunities
for
this
reflective
research
thought
and
may
provide
thereby
enhance
situation
really
affects
the
totality
of
the
The
study
will
provide
some
insights
and
the
benefit
the
of
the
customers
such
as
the
teachers
and
students who are their main clients who must be served and
be satisfied.
Scope and Delimitation of the Study
The study focused on the assessment of the cooperativemanaged canteen as perceived by the school personnel and
students of Maysan National High School. The respondents of
this
study
consisted
of
the
40
school
personnel
and
80
the
assessment
management
of
activities,
the
school
utilization
canteen
of
in
terms
facilities,
of
quality
the
School
Year
2008-2009.
The
researcher
limited
Definition of Terms
For the better understanding of this study, some of
the terms and variables used are defined below.
Assessment. It refers the observations of the students, the
faculty, the non-teaching staff as means of evaluating
the
effectiveness
canteen.
It
means
how
the
management
of
the
activities,
utilization
of
commodities
offered
to
the
consumers
in
the
includes
the
canteen.
Canteen
Management.
In
this
research,
it
of
the
food
school
service
canteen
management,
which
include
physical
Clientele.
In
this
study,
it
refers
to
the
students,
is
operated
and
managed
by
the
teachers
In
this
research,
it
refers
to
the
chairs,
and
other
items
bought
in
the
school
canteen.
Meal
Management.
It
is
the
efficient
use
of
available
sanitary,
economical,
and
aesthetically
10
functions
in
the
school
canteen
to
achieve
and
Quantity
of
Food
Served.
It
refers
to
the
or
characterized
in
terms
of
nutrition,
teachers,
non-teaching
staff
take
their
11
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF THE RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES
This
researcher
section
presents
reviewed
and
related
found
and
studies
significant
to
which
the
the
present
the
Turn-Over
of
the
School
Canteen
Teachers
served,
canteen
sanitation,
use
of
facilities
for
laboratory purpose.
The
school
canteen
should
provide
cheap,
sanitary,
of
good
health
from
the
municipal
health
practices
that
will
be
detrimental
and
school
as
whole
as
well
as
any
violation
of
the
to
see
how
their
healthy
school
canteens
are
13
many
school
principals
and
canteen
managers
who
have
to
change
existing
menu
items,
or
have
yet
to
to
This
be
able
will
to
guide
the
maintain
or
improve
their
manager
in
deciding
which
of
who
the
is
canteen
capable,
must
be
qualified
managed
and
by
honest
personnel.
2. Adequate facilities maintain the services needed
and enhance the efficiency of the canteen workers
in doing their job.
14
following
information
about
literature
the
deal
on
the
administrations
significant
role
in
the
of
the
canteens
were
managed
individuals.
All
canteen
facilities
and
by
private
equipment
procurement
was
supervised
by
outside
paid
helpers;
3. The canteen managers saw to it that the food to be
cooked are washed thoroughly;
4. Majority
of
the
canteens
were
implementing
self-
15
following:
time
schedule
for
recess
of
intermediate
16
run
have
implementations,
by
the
staff
different
and
personnel
reactions
particularly
in
on
class
involved,
some
policy
programming,
food
to
the
recommendations
that
the
school
heads
should
(1998)
conducted
research
on
the
canteen
study
wa
to
make
system
analysis
of
the
canteen
canteen
management
is
necessary
in
order
that
to
to
manage
the
canteen;
lack
of
full
time
canteen
solutions
were
provided
to
lessen
or
totally
addition
of
installation
more
of
tables
deep
and
well
chairs,
and
cooking
better
water
they
be
render
free
from
and
finally,
teaching
the
loads
canteen
to
the
teachers
enable
her
to
In
fact
most
of
these
schools
already
have
management
is
also
considered
18
not
just
school
function but also a full time job that needs formal training
and that many universities offer such courses.
In
2000,
SINDARATANA
studied
PORN
the
canteen
involved
170
respondents
from
the
lower
and
upper
physically,
appropriate
with
regard
the
settings;
to
food
canteen
food
was
prices
quantity;
clean
were
dishes
and
neat
appropriately
and
utensils
with
set
were
billboard
helped
students
to
have
knowledge
of
19
In
related
WATWERUWAN
study,
SCHOOL
LUNCH
(2000)
WONGKHUM
(found
PROGRAM
evaluated
in
the
the
Saraphi
during
included
students,
evaluated
296
whether
the
the
academic
parents
lunch
year
and
1999.
Respondents
teachers.
program
The
management
study
aims
of
attitudes,
were
achieved
and
realized.
Evaluation
the
performance
teachers
understand
hygienic
habits;
include:
the
2)
1)
aim
of
personnel,
students,
the
program
budget
and
serving
clean
food
with
parents
proper
and
and
develop
materials
are
nutrition.
5)
and
reach
or
achieve
its
aims
for
the
program
that
is
students with good health and hygienic habit who knew how to
save.
Both
SINDARATANA
PORN
(2000)
and
WONG
KHUM
(2000)
and
maintained
the
by
the
school,
meaning
everyone
from
administrators
and
canteen
teachers
with
the
most
not
directly
related
to
teaching-learning
situation,
21
include
equipment
like
the
machinery,
furnishings
and
the
periods
of
meal
service,
custodial
activities
school
by
canteen
making
it
should
be
possible
established
for
to
children
benefit
to
buy
allow
moderate
profits.
It
is
imperative
that
the
22
having
healthy
attitudes
towards
food,
having
the
healthy
food
ways
using
role
of
the
appropriate
canteen
physical
in
and
providing
human
resources
from
the
is
already
happening,
building
awareness,
forming
The
ideal
school
canteen
provides
wide
food
preparations
23
method
including
grilling,
to
(2004)
MEDRANA
in
her
article,
school
canteens have always been an integral part of any wellestablish educational institution. But the school canteen or
cafeteria is different from a commercial outfit that is also
subjected
to
government
commercial
canteens
and
sanitary
controls.
restaurants
are
Whereas
established
for
benefit
the
students
while
offering
them
decent
yet
affordable fare.
The school canteen should also serve as the showcase of
skills and knowledge learned in the classroom about food and
nutrition.
It
can
also
provide
an
avenue
for
parental
community,
is
in
vantage
position
to
make
and
prevent
healthy
the
foods
school
at
affordable
children
24
from
prices.
staying
off
They
the
school
campus
during
recess
time
and
lunch
break.
Well
investigated
in
this
study
and
the
literature
was
by
MORPHET
since
(1994),
then
the
major
school
division
food
service
of
school
school
lunch
program
was
approximately
one
billion
public
elementary
and
secondary
school
pupils
were
of
services
rendered
which
are
characterized
the
as
25
drab and monotonous which turn the kids off because they are
not planned to respond to the needs of the children. To be
in competition with the array of foods available to kids
both in and out of schools, service is the key. The selling
point
in
attitude,
most
food
environment
service
and
programs
charisma.
is
service,
Greater
the
emphasis
on
and
inflation,
the
only
choice
for
the
food
technology to free
service,
anticipating
handling
highest
future
complaints
ethical
needs
of
of
relations
customers
students,
with
student,
serving
interest,
handling
request
and
26
good
operation
without
good
environment,
good
food
and
friendly service.
In
this
regard,
an
extensive
cooperative
study
of
school lunch policies and standards was done. This was made
by
school
lunch
supervisor,
education
specialists,
classroom
members,
principals,
teachers,
university
superintendent,
state
department
professors
and
of
others
Few
children
would
consider
nutrition
to
be
difference
between
the
nutritious
and
the
less
charge.
If
the
price
appears
to
be
high,
27
of
their
unhealthier
items
to
help
subsidize
and
28
proposed
activities
which
will
help
yield
to
supervise
is
needed.
Clear
guidelines
in
the
of
their
them.
task
so
Lastly,
they
can
school
provide
canteen
the
services
managers
should
know how to maximize the use of canteen equipment for overall client satisfaction.
29
Research Framework
Based on the foregoing discussion of related literature
and studies, this study utilized paradigm below:
Figure 2.
Research Framework
Independent Variables
Dependent Variables
Area of Assessment
Management Skills
of the canteen
Officials
Level of Performance
Of Teachers
Cooperative-Managed
Canteen
Adequacy of Facilities
Services rendered
Assumptions
There
are
certain
qualifications
that
one
should
seminars
for
the
staff
that
will
make
their
30
2.
3.
4.
5.
31
32
Definition of Terms
For the better understanding of this study, some of the
terms and variables are defined below:
School Canteen - refers to one of the ancillary services
in
the
school
system
to
sells
food
items
to
the
eaten
nourishes
the
body
building
and
repairing
33
providing
meals
that
are
nutritionally
adequate,
Clientele
customers
who
eat
or
dine
regularly,
of
Facilities
capacity
of
facilities
and
and
Equipment
equipment
refers
to
to
the
satisfy
the
clients needs.
Quality of Food this refers to the aspect of food which
describes
or
characterize
in
terms
of
nutrition,
by
the
cafeteria
34
personnel
reflecting
the
CHAPTER III
Method and Procedures
data
gathering
procedure
and
processing
and
the
method
and
A. Research Design
The
gathered
researcher
information
questionnaire
as
more
to
time
an
used
the
descriptive
through
the
use
of
instrument,
to
give
the
provide
their
answers
survey
respondents
freely
and
and
National
conducted
with
policies
High
the
involved
School
in
Canteen.
approval
of
the
the
This
management
research
clientele
on
of
was
the
it
to
be
efficient
and
maintained
32
so
that
they
B. Research Locale
The Maysan National High School canteen has been run
by
Maysan
Teachers
Cooperative
for
several
years.
Ever
first
and
ultimate
concern
of
the
school
canteen.
study
canteen
as
to
far
determine
as
how
the
management
clientele
perceive
the
canteen
services
are
includes
the
and
target
population
of
the
study
respondents
were
taken
from
population.
33
each
stratum
of
the
20
603
20
561
20
443
20
549
Faculty Members
72
20
Non-Teaching Personnel
20
20
Total
2248
120
D. Research Instrument
The researcher formulated the necessary items of the
instrument (Appendix: 71) to measure the variables in the
study. A Likert Scale type of questionnaire was designed to
determine
the
respondents
extent
of
agreement
to
the
34
which
are
similar
to
her
study.
Table
of
of
the
questions.
The
first
draft
of
the
then
pretested
administration.
The
adapted
the
from
among
the
criterion
study
canteen
used
of
in
staff
validation
MENDOZA:2004
and
was
(Canteen
the
research
instrument
was
valid.
Finally,
the
legend
below
was
used
to
help
the
35
respondents
with
the
cooperation
of
the
selected
students
from
results
were
analyzed
to
determine
the
researcher
using
SPSS.
applied
appropriate
Afterwards,
the
statistical
researcher
analysis
classified,
following
statistical
techniques
were
used
in
36
to
determine
the
nature
37
and
extent
of
the
Chapter IV
PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS, AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA
of
quality
management,
and
quantity
utilization
of
food
of
school
served,
facilities,
kinds
of
services
food
statistically
Correlation
Coefficient
prove
was
this
computed.
claim,
In
this
38
the
Pearson
study,
the
Non-
Overall
Teaching
Mean
Personnel
1. The management and planning of
the canteen's staff are perceived
to be effective and successful
2. Canteen management is committed
to the promotion of healthy food
in schools
3. The Canteen manager and staff are
informed and aware of the canteen
policy, as ordered by the
Department of Education
4. Canteen staff are aware and have
access to the information about
the status of the canteen, Thus,
the management practices
transparency and honesty
5. Canteen staff informed of
relevant school activities such
as school events, functions, and
other school programs
6. Canteen staff have the
opportunity to receive training
for professional development
Xx
Legend:
The
2.06
1.85
2.30
2.05
2.76
1.95
2.10
2.52
2.29
3.20
3.20
2.54
3.06
3.05
3.00
3.05
2.04
1.95
2.25
2.06
2.55
1.95
2.25
2.40
2.46
2.33
2.52
2.44
management
of
the
school
canteen
activities
was
39
the
status
sometimes.
This
of
the
means
school
that
the
canteen
student
(Xw
3.06),
respondents
are
the
relevant
activities
of
the
school
events,
the
by
the
the
teacher
information
respondents
on
the
perceived
policies
this
prescribed
item
to
be
observed
item
#1
i.e.
the
management
and
planning
of
school
40
third
item:
canteen
management
is
committed
to
the
obtained
personnel
these
mean
was
on
the
2.52,
values,
perception
interpreted
apparently
as
the
of
the
non-teaching
sometimes.
non-teaching
Ranking
personnel
the
effective
management
effective
management
of
the
41
Faculty
Teaching
Personnel
Overall
Mean
2.04
1.95
2.20
2.05
2.79
2.75
2.70
2.77
2.04
1.95
2.10
2.03
2.31
2.30
2.35
2.32
2.04
1.95
2.10
2.03
2.68
2.55
2.60
2.64
2.32
2.24
2.34
2.30
42
respondents
was
for
the
item
i.e.
the
canteen
2.75,
for
item
2:
provide
appropriate
places
for
and
following:
comfort
the
lowest
item
1:
and
pleasant
mean
arrange
value
chairs
atmosphere
of
computed
was
and
tables
to
the
canteen,
on
the
attain
item
3:
mean
value
was
2.70,
for
the
item
Provide
43
the
canteen
seldom
has
enough
space
to
accommodate
diners and likewise seldom has enough spoons and forks ready
for use.
Overall assessment of the utilization of the canteen
facilities
by
the
student
respondents
was
2.32,
by
the
and
equipment
help
the
canteen
staff
to
of
equipment
posed
as
problem
among
school
44
Legend:
Faculty Personnel
Overall
Mean
2.04
1.95
2.25
2.06
3.05
3.15
3.20
3.09
2.04
1.95
2.15
2.04
3.08
3.05
3.00
3.06
2.04
1.95
2.25
2.06
45
and
followed
by
the
canteen
staff
(X
3.08),
the
perception
of
mean
gained
for
was
the
teacher
item
2:
respondents
the
canteen
the
sells
canteen
sustain
the
sells
needs
appropriate
of
the
amount
students,
(X
of
=
foods
that
can
and
the
3.20),
the
student
respondents
was
(X
2.45),
by
faculty
46
2.57).
The
overall
mean
obtained
was
(X
2.48),
interpreted as seldom.
The findings indicate that the canteen management should be
careful that they serve quality foods which affect the success of
canteen operation. Efficient and effective implementation by the
management of the set goals of food service is greatly affected by
the quality of food (Zamora:1982).
the
kinds
of
services
they
receive
from
the
school
canteen.
Table 5
Weighted Means (Xw)on the Kinds of Services Rendered to the
Customers As Perceived by the Respondents
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Kinds of Services
Rendered to the
Customers
Maintains safety and uses
good quality equipment and
facilities
Provides ventilation and
lighting facilities to make
the diners comfortable
Establishes a harmonious and
friendly relationship with
customers
Payments are properly and
accurately changed and
counted
Entertains suggestions and
easily manages complaints
Legend:
NonOverall
Teaching
Mean
Personnel
Students
Faculty
2.10
2.25
2.15
2.17
2.04
2.90
2.25
2.40
2.42
2.15
2.35
2.31
2.04
2.90
2.20
2.38
2.31
2.30
2.35
2.32
47
harmonious
customers,
and
the
and
lowest
friendly
mean
value
relationship
was
2.04
with
for
the
the
perception
of
teacher
respondents
on
this
variable, the highest mean value acquired was 2.90, this was
for the following two items also: 1.) the canteen provides
ventilation
and
lighting
facilities
to
make
the
diners
the
services
of
the
school
canteen.
The
researcher
how
they
are
treated
and
how
the
teachers
are
dont
feel
that
special
service
that
the
teachers
enjoy.
As to the perception of the non-teaching personnel the
48
staff
establish
harmonious
and
the
friendly
shows
that
the
three
groups
of
respondents
the
canteen
fail
to
render
good
service,
the
to
Lattin
(1979),
no
operation
would
be
personalized
and
service,
anticipating
the
prompt
future
handling
needs
49
of
of
the
shows
the
computed
mean
values
on
the
of
the
school
canteen.
As
to
the
perceived
Faculty
Teaching
Personnel
1. Healthy canteen
choices are sold at
competitive prices
2. Sells food at
affordable prices
3. Provides cheap but
nutritious foods for
snacks and lunch
supplements
4. Offers cost saving
meals to the
customers like in
value or combo meals
5. Variation in prices
of foods depends on
quality and quantity
Legend:
Overall
Mean
2.01
2.15
1.85
2.01
2.69
2.55
2.60
2.65
2.04
1.90
2.35
2.07
2.40
2.25
2.35
2.37
2.04
1.90
2.30
2.06
50
are
sold
at
competitive
prices,
(X
2.01),
interpreted as seldom.
Meanwhile
on
the
perception
of
the
non-teaching
nutritious
foods
for
snacks
and
lunch
supplements,
51
For the students the item with the highest rating was
for No. 2. Sells food at affordable price, (X =2.65), while
the item with the lowest rating was No. 1.)Healthy canteen
choices are sold at competitive prices, X = 2.01.
Among the three groups of respondents, the highest mean
was on the perception of the non-teaching personnel (X =
2.29), the second was from the perception of the student
respondents (X = 2.24), and the lowest mean among all was
from the faculty respondents (X = 2.15). The overall mean
rating
seldom.
The managers role in food costing is important. If the
manager decides to set a high cost of a particular meal,
this will also cause in a higher price of the commodity. But
it does not mean that to lower the price is to lower the
quantity of food. If the price of the food will remain at
this
state,
students
will
no
longer
visit
the
canteen
instead they will bring their own snacks bought outside the
school, or will bring cooked food from their home.
52
appears
the
that
there
management
of
is
the
negative
school
relationship
canteen
and
the
test.
The
result
reveals
that
there
is
slight
null
significant
hypothesis
is
relationship
accepted,
between
that
the
there
management
is
and
no
the
Management of
School Canteen
Pearson
Correlation
Management
of
School
Canteen
Utilization
of
Canteen
Facilities
-.034
Sig. (2-tailed)
Utilization of
Canteen
Facilities
.711
Pearson
Correlation
-.034
Sig. (2-tailed)
.711
greater
than
.05.
canteen
staff
to
The
Management
properly
use
should
and
encourage
maximize
all
of
the
the
3.2
Pearson
correlation
coefficient
obtained
between
Management of
School Canteen
Quality and
Quantity
of Food Serve
Pearson
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
Pearson
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
54
Management
of
School
Canteen
Quality
and
Quantity
of
Food
Served
.064
.485
.064
.485
significant
at
0.05
level.
There
is
only
slight
insignificant relationship.
The result of this assessment should not be ignored by
the canteen manager, it is very alarming that the canteen
earns much everyday but could not give the exact or right
nutritional value for the food they sell to the customers
especially to the students.
3.3 Kinds of Services Rendered to Customers
There
is
low
negative
relationship
between
the
fail
to
satisfy
the
needs
of
the
customers
is
of
the
teachers
but
also
for
the
students
who
55
are not served better and they know it, they will no longer
patronize
their
the
canteens
allowance
and
products,
buy
their
instead
snack
they
later
will
after
keep
their
classes.
Table 9
Pearson Correlation Coefficients
Management of the School Canteen and
The Kinds of Services Rendered to Customers
Management
Kinds of
of
Services
School
Rendered to
Canteen
Customers
Management of
Pearson
1
.149
School Canteen
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
.104
Kinds of
Services
Rendered to
Customers
Pearson
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
.149
.104
the
assessment
for
the
area
of
management
and
the
fail
to
satisfy
the
need
of
the
customers
is
56
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
.882
.375
0.375
57
table
below
displays
the
Difference
significance
on
the
of
the
The table shows that the F-value obtained was .093, with
significance value of .993. Since the significance value is more
than .05, it means that there is no significant difference between
the perceptions of the respondents. Therefore, the result shows
that
the
groups
perception
on
the
management
of
the
school
58
is
no
significance
difference
among
the
groups
As
personnel
a
whole,
on
the
how
the
canteen
respondents
facilities
observed
that
are
the
Lack
of
equipment
posed
as
problem
among
school
value
is
more
than
.05,
there
is
no
Therefore,
the
result
says
that
there
is
no
non-teaching
personnel
assessment
on
the
quality
and
serve
success
of
quality
canteen
food
because
operation.
this
will
Efficient
affects
and
the
effective
60
service
is
greatly
affected
by
the
quality
of
food
(Zamora:1982).
are
Table 14
Results of the Analysis of Variance of the Perceptions
of the Respondents on the Kinds of Services
Rendered to Customers
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Table
14
that
there
is
no
significant
them.
understood
There
that
is
no
the
other
canteen
customers.
61
expectation
exists
to
set
as
feed
it
was
all
its
Table
15
contains
the
level
of
significance
of
the
the
variables
that
affect
the
overall
status
of
the
school canteen.
Table 15
Results of the Analysis of Variance of the Perception of the
Respondents on the Prices of Commodities
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
It
is
therefore
concluded
that
there
is
no
it
is
greater
than
.05.
The
three
groups
of
at
customers.
competitive
Considering
prices
that
should
most
of
be
the
offered
to
all
customers
are
for
snacks
and
lunch
62
supplements.
In
variation,
5.1
the
student
found
to
respondents
be
and
-0.06077,
the
which
faculty
indicates
respondents
a
was
negligible
of
the
student
respondents
and
not-teaching
personnel
faculty
computed
coefficient
respondents
and
respondents
was
-0.027,
correlation,
interpreted
of
the
which
that
the
the
non-teaching
indicates
perception
63
perception
of
the
personnel
negligible
of
the
two
64
Chapter V
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This
chapter
presents
the
summary
of
findings,
the
assessment
management
of
on
school
respondents
yielded
interpreted
as
the
effectiveness
canteen
a
activities
mean
seldom.
of
This
score
means
the
by
of
that
the
2.44,
the
highest
mean
value
of
3.09,
for
the
item:
65
overall
mean
obtained
for
all
areas
of
are
no
significant
differences
in
the
the
management
of
school
canteen
activities,
management
has
something
to
do
with
proper
training
for
canteen
staff.
Enough
66
school
objectives,
canteen
to
thus
creating
major
finding
accomplish
more
its
problems
target
in
the
was
the
future.
3. The
second
of
this
study
lacking
with
the
necessary
nutritional
value
the
major
findings,
given
was
found
to
be
the
adequate
quality
of
service
since
the
canteen
67
6. In
terms
of
price
of
commodities,
students
find
Recommendations
In as much as the canteen management and the status of
the school canteen were assessed by the respondents to be
inadequate
and
have
not
reached
the
level
of
excellence
recommended
measures
to
improve
the
management
in
this
study
should
be
adopted
and
implemented.
2. In terms of proper preparation, formal trainings and
seminars
should
be
conducted
and
participated
in
by
skills
preparation,
through
on
food
effective
the
proper
selection,
handling
of
customer
interpersonal
skills
food,
food
satisfaction
and
total
68
can
provide
financial
help
to
those
who
Chairs
supervise
proper
or
the
Heads
of
activities
monitoring
the
of
Teachers
their
emphasizing
canteen
Cooperative
staff
efficiency
for
and
effectivity.
6. Canteen facilities must be properly utilized in order
to maximize and systematize the use of these
instruments.
7. Commodities must be affordable yet nutritious so that
the clientele will be satisfied.
8. Canteen staff must provide variety of food geared
towards the total well being of the clients.
69
9. Cooperative
incentives
Officials
or
merits
should
in
provide
whatever
70
form
some
kind
of
in
order
to
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Books:
Unpublished Materials:
xvi
OTHERS:
DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2007
DECS Order No.93, s.1998
Regional Memorandum No. 70,s.2008
Schools Policy handbook, January 1998
Texas Department of Education, 2003
The School Center Handbook.
Department of Education 1999
xvii
5
Always
4
Often
3
Sometimes
2
Seldom
1
Never
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
A.
C.
Price of Commodities
Level q1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
q2
1
2
3
4
3
4
3
4
2
5
4
2
3
q3
4
2
1
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
3
2
3
q4
2
3
4
2
1
4
3
2
3
4
5
2
3
q5
4
2
3
4
3
2
1
4
5
2
3
4
2
q6
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
q7
4
2
3
5
3
1
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
1
2
3
4
5
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
4
2
4
3
2
2
3
2
3
4
2
3
2
4
5
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
3
4
2
3
4
3
2
3
4
5
2
3
4
2
5
3
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
3
2
3
4
2
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
5
2
2
3
2
3
2
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
1
2
4
2
2
3
4
2
3
4
3
2
3
4
5
2
3
2
4
2
3
4
3
2
3
4
5
2
3
4
2
4
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
4
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
2
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
3
1
2
2
3
4
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
4
2
4
3
2
2
3
2
3
4
2
3
3
4
5
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
2
3
4
2
3
4
3
2
3
4
5
2
3
4
3
5
3
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
3
2
3
4
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
4
2
3
2
3
3
4
2
4
3
2
2
3
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
2
3
4
2
3
2
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
2
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
3
2
3
3
2
3
4
2
3
5
3
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
4
2
3
2
4
2
3
2
3
3
4
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
2
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
3
2
3
4
2
3
5
3
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
5
3
2
3
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
3
2
2
3
2
3
4
2
3
2
4
2
3
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
3
4
3
2
3
4
5
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
4
2
4
3
2
2
3
2
3
4
2
2
3
4
5
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
3
2
3
4
5
2
3
2
3
5
3
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
3
2
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
2
4
2
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
4
3
2
3
4
2
3
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
5
3
2
3
q8
q9
2
3
4
2
3
1
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
q10
2
3
4
2
3
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
5
q11
5
2
3
4
2
4
1
2
2
1
2
3
1
q12
2
3
4
2
3
3
3
2
1
1
2
3
5
q13
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
1
5
3
2
3
4
q14
4
2
3
4
3
4
3
4
2
1
4
2
5
q15
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
1
3
4
3
2
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
3
2
3
4
5
1
3
2
1
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
3
1
2
2
3
4
3
1
2
2
2
1
2
3
2
3
4
2
3
1
2
3
4
2
1
1
2
3
2
1
2
2
3
4
2
1
2
2
1
2
4
2
2
3
2
4
2
1
2
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
3
4
2
4
3
2
2
3
2
3
4
2
3
2
4
5
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
4
3
1
2
4
3
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
3
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
2
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
1
2
4
2
1
2
4
2
1
2
1
3
1
2
3
2
1
2
3
2
2
2
3
2
1
3
2
1
2
4
2
1
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
5
2
2
3
2
3
2
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
1
2
4
2
2
3
4
2
3
4
3
2
3
4
5
2
3
2
4
2
1
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
4
3
1
2
2
3
4
3
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
3
4
2
3
1
2
3
4
2
1
1
2
4
2
1
2
2
3
4
2
1
2
2
1
2
4
4
2
3
2
4
2
1
2
3
2
3
4
2
3
3
3
4
2
4
3
2
2
3
2
3
4
2
3
3
4
5
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
3
4
3
1
3
4
2
1
3
2
3
4
2
3
3
1
2
3
3
4
3
1
2
2
3
4
3
1
3
4
2
1
3
1
2
3
4
2
3
1
2
3
2
1
2
3
3
4
2
1
2
2
3
4
2
1
4
2
1
2
3
4
2
3
2
4
2
1
2
3
2
4
2
3
2
3
3
4
2
4
3
2
2
3
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
2
3
4
2
3
2
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
3
1
3
4
2
1
3
2
2
2
1
2
3
1
2
3
3
4
3
1
2
4
2
1
1
2
3
4
2
1
3
1
2
3
4
2
2
1
2
4
2
1
2
3
3
4
2
1
2
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
1
2
3
4
2
3
2
2
3
4
2
3
2
4
2
3
2
3
3
4
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
2
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
3
1
2
3
4
3
1
2
2
2
1
2
3
1
2
3
2
3
1
2
3
4
2
1
1
2
3
4
2
1
2
3
4
2
1
2
2
1
2
4
2
1
2
3
4
2
1
2
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
1
2
4
3
2
2
3
2
3
4
2
3
2
4
2
3
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
3
4
2
1
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
3
4
3
1
2
2
3
4
3
1
2
2
2
1
3
1
2
3
4
2
3
1
2
3
4
2
1
1
3
4
2
1
2
2
3
4
2
1
2
2
1
2
3
4
2
3
2
4
2
1
2
3
2
3
4
2
2
3
3
4
2
4
3
2
2
3
2
3
4
2
2
3
4
5
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
2
3
4
3
1
3
4
2
1
2
3
1
2
3
3
4
3
1
2
3
4
2
1
3
1
2
3
4
2
1
2
3
3
4
2
1
3
4
2
1
2
3
4
2
3
3
2
4
2
3
2
3
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
q16
q17
4
2
3
4
3
2
3
4
5
1
3
4
2
q18
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
1
2
q19
4
2
3
5
3
2
3
1
2
3
4
2
3
q20
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
1
5
3
q21
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
1
5
3
2
3
4
q22
2
3
4
2
3
3
4
2
3
4
1
3
4
q23
5
2
3
4
2
4
1
2
2
1
2
3
1
2
3
4
2
3
3
3
2
1
1
2
3
4
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
3
4
2
3
4
3
2
3
4
5
2
3
4
2
5
3
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
3
2
3
4
2
3
2
1
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
5
1
2
2
3
4
3
1
2
2
2
1
2
3
2
3
4
2
3
1
2
3
4
2
1
1
2
3
2
1
5
2
3
4
2
1
2
2
1
2
4
2
4
2
3
4
3
2
3
4
5
2
3
4
2
4
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
4
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
2
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
3
1
2
2
3
4
5
4
3
1
2
4
3
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
3
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
2
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
1
2
4
2
1
2
4
2
1
2
1
3
1
2
3
2
1
2
3
2
2
2
3
2
1
3
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
2
3
4
2
3
4
3
2
3
4
5
2
3
4
3
5
3
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
3
2
3
4
2
4
2
1
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
4
3
1
2
2
3
4
3
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
3
4
2
3
1
2
3
4
2
1
1
2
4
2
1
2
2
3
4
2
1
2
2
1
2
4
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
2
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
3
2
3
3
2
3
4
2
3
5
3
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
3
4
3
1
3
4
2
1
3
2
3
4
2
3
3
1
2
3
3
4
3
1
2
2
3
4
3
1
3
4
2
1
3
1
2
3
4
2
3
1
2
3
2
1
2
3
3
4
2
1
2
2
3
4
2
1
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
3
2
3
4
2
3
5
3
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
5
3
2
3
4
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
3
1
3
4
2
1
3
2
2
2
1
2
3
1
2
3
3
4
3
1
2
4
2
1
1
2
3
4
2
1
3
1
2
3
4
2
2
1
2
4
2
1
2
3
3
4
2
1
2
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
3
4
3
2
3
4
5
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
3
1
2
3
4
3
1
2
2
2
1
2
3
1
2
3
2
3
1
2
3
4
2
1
1
2
3
4
2
1
2
3
4
2
1
2
2
1
2
4
2
1
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
3
2
3
4
5
2
3
2
3
5
3
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
3
2
3
4
3
4
2
1
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
3
4
3
1
2
2
3
4
3
1
2
2
2
1
3
1
2
3
4
2
3
1
2
3
4
2
1
1
3
4
2
1
2
2
3
4
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
2
4
2
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
4
3
2
3
4
2
3
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
5
3
2
3
2
3
4
3
1
3
4
2
1
2
3
1
2
3
3
4
3
1
2
3
4
2
1
3
1
2
3
4
2
1
2
3
3
4
2
1
q24
q25
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
5
3
1
3
4
q26
4
2
5
4
3
4
3
4
2
3
4
1
3
q27
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
1
2
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
3
2
3
4
5
1
3
85
67
90
86
80
81
76
68
82
76
77
72
85
2
3
2
4
2
1
2
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
3
4
2
4
3
2
2
3
2
3
4
2
3
2
4
5
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
83
75
78
75
86
78
72
68
77
78
81
69
74
79
2
1
2
4
2
1
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
5
2
2
3
2
3
2
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
1
2
4
2
2
3
4
2
3
4
3
2
3
4
5
2
3
2
80
59
76
92
71
70
77
81
74
74
75
74
72
78
4
2
3
2
4
2
1
2
3
2
3
4
2
3
3
3
4
2
4
3
2
2
3
2
3
4
2
3
3
4
5
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
81
81
75
75
75
86
78
72
68
77
78
81
69
74
4
2
1
2
3
4
2
3
2
4
2
1
2
3
2
4
2
3
2
3
3
4
2
4
3
2
2
3
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
2
3
4
2
3
2
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
79
80
59
76
78
81
81
75
75
75
86
78
72
68
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
1
2
3
4
2
3
2
2
3
4
2
3
2
4
2
3
2
3
3
4
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
2
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
77
78
81
69
74
79
80
59
76
78
81
81
75
75
4
2
1
2
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
1
2
4
3
2
2
3
2
3
4
2
3
2
4
2
3
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
75
86
78
72
68
77
78
81
69
74
79
80
59
76
3
4
2
3
2
4
2
1
2
3
2
3
4
2
2
3
3
4
2
4
3
2
2
3
2
3
4
2
2
3
4
5
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
2
3
4
2
78
81
81
75
75
75
86
78
72
68
77
78
81
69
3
4
2
1
2
3
4
2
3
3
2
4
2
3
2
3
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
74
80
79
60
76
78
81
81
75
X
78
77
81
79
75
79
80
75
70
74
81
76
76
76
77
78
72
74
77
76
1,529
76.45
X-XMEAN
W
2
0
5
3
-2
3
3
-2
-6
-2
5
-1
0
-1
1
1
-4
-2
0
-1
0
Y
81
75
75
75
86
78
72
68
77
78
81
69
74
79
80
59
76
78
81
81
1,523
76.15
Y-YMEAN
XY
Z
5
6318
-1
5737.5
-1
6075
-1 5943.75
10
6428.5
2
6162
-4
5742
-8
5066
1 5409.25
2
5791.5
5
6561
-7
5209.5
-2
5642.5
3 5984.25
4
6180
-17 4587.25
0
5472
2
5772
5
6196.5
5 6135.75
0 116414.3
X2
6084
5852.25
6561
6280.5625
5587.5625
6241
6360.0625
5550.25
4935.0625
5513.0625
6561
5700.25
5814.0625
5738.0625
5967.5625
6045.0625
5184
5476
5852.25
5738.0625
117041.125
Y2
6561
5625
5625
5625
7396
6084
5184
4624
5929
6084
6561
4761
5476
6241
6400
3481
5776
6084
6561
6561
116639
-0.06077
WZ
7.5175
-0.0575
-5.2325
-3.22
-16.745
4.7175
-13.695
15.8925
-5.27
-4.07
22.0675
6.7925
0.43
-1.995
3.08
-22.295
0.6675
-4.5325
0.2425
-3.395
-19.1
W2
2.4025
0.0025
20.7025
7.84
2.89
6.5025
10.89
3.8025
38.44
4.84
20.7025
0.9025
0.04
0.49
0.64
1.69
19.8025
6.0025
0.0025
0.49
149.075
Z2
23.5225
1.3225
1.3225
1.3225
97.0225
3.4225
17.2225
66.4225
0.7225
3.4225
23.5225
51.1225
4.6225
8.1225
14.8225
294.1225
0.0225
3.4225
23.5225
23.5225
662.55
X
78
77
81
79
75
79
80
75
70
74
81
76
76
76
77
78
72
74
77
76
1,529
76.45
X-XMEAN Y
W
2
0
5
3
-2
3
3
-2
-6
-2
5
-1
0
-1
1
1
-4
-2
0
-1
0
75
75
75
86
78
72
68
77
78
81
69
74
80
79
60
76
78
81
81
75
1,518
75.9
Y-YMEAN XY
X2
Y2
Z
WZ
W2
-1
5850
6084
5625
-1.7825
-1
5737.5
5852.25
5625
-0.0575
-1
6075
6561
5625
-5.2325
10
6815.5
6280.5625
7396
27.58
2
5830.5
5587.5625
6084
-3.145
-4
5688
6241
5184
-10.5825
-8
5423
6360.0625
4624
-26.895
1
5736.5
5550.25
5929
-1.6575
2
5479.5
4935.0625
6084
-11.47
5 6014.25
5513.0625
6561
-10.67
-7
5589
6561
4761
-32.5325
-2
5587
5700.25
5476
2.0425
4
6100
5814.0625
6400
-0.77
3 5984.25
5738.0625
6241
-1.995
-16
4635
5967.5625
3600
-12.92
0
5909
6045.0625
5776
-0.195
2
5616
5184
6084
-8.2325
5
5994
5476
6561
-11.8825
5
6196.5
5852.25
6561
0.2425
-1 5681.25
5738.0625
5625
0.805
-5 115941.8 117041.125
115822
-109.35
-0.3635
2.4025
0.0025
20.7025
7.84
2.89
6.5025
10.89
3.8025
38.44
4.84
20.7025
0.9025
0.04
0.49
0.64
1.69
19.8025
6.0025
0.0025
0.49
149.075
Z2
1.3225
1.3225
1.3225
97.0225
3.4225
17.2225
66.4225
0.7225
3.4225
23.5225
51.1225
4.6225
14.8225
8.1225
260.8225
0.0225
3.4225
23.5225
23.5225
1.3225
607.05
X
81
75
75
75
86
78
72
68
77
78
81
69
74
79
80
59
76
78
81
81
1,523
76.15
X-XMEAN Y
W
5
-1
-1
-1
10
2
-4
-8
1
2
5
-7
-2
3
4
-17
0
2
5
5
-6
75
75
75
86
78
72
68
77
78
81
69
74
80
79
60
76
78
81
81
75
1,518
75.9
Y-YMEAN XY
X2
Z
-1
6075
-1
5625
-1
5625
10
6450
2
6708
-4
5616
-8
4896
1
5236
2
6006
5
6318
-7
5589
-2
5106
4
5920
3
6241
-16
4800
0
4484
2
5928
5
6318
5
6561
-1
6075
-5
115577
Y2
WZ
6561
5625
5625
5625
7396
6084
5184
4624
5929
6084
6561
4761
5476
6241
6400
3481
5776
6084
6561
6561
116639
5625
5625
5625
7396
6084
5184
4624
5929
6084
6561
4761
5476
6400
6241
3600
5776
6084
6561
6561
5625
115822
-0.02708
-5.2325
1.6675
1.6675
-14.2825
17.6675
-6.4325
36.2675
-7.1825
1.0175
7.5175
-32.5325
16.0175
-9.4325
7.2675
-57.3325
2.6175
-0.8325
7.5175
22.0675
-5.2325
-17.2
W2
20.7025
2.1025
2.1025
2.1025
91.2025
2.4025
19.8025
71.4025
0.3025
2.4025
20.7025
55.5025
6.0025
6.5025
12.6025
304.5025
0.2025
2.4025
20.7025
20.7025
664.35
Z2
1.3225
1.3225
1.3225
97.0225
3.4225
17.2225
66.4225
0.7225
3.4225
23.5225
51.1225
4.6225
14.8225
8.1225
260.8225
0.0225
3.4225
23.5225
23.5225
1.3225
607.05