This document outlines a marking rubric for an assignment on designing ICT-mediated learning environments. It is divided into two sections - technical and content. The technical section focuses on word count, spelling, layout, bibliography, and file saving, worth a total of 14 points. The content section examines originality, argument, structure, coverage of topic, and integration of knowledge, worth a total of 25 points. Scores range from excellent to poor for each criteria.
This document outlines a marking rubric for an assignment on designing ICT-mediated learning environments. It is divided into two sections - technical and content. The technical section focuses on word count, spelling, layout, bibliography, and file saving, worth a total of 14 points. The content section examines originality, argument, structure, coverage of topic, and integration of knowledge, worth a total of 25 points. Scores range from excellent to poor for each criteria.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
This document outlines a marking rubric for an assignment on designing ICT-mediated learning environments. It is divided into two sections - technical and content. The technical section focuses on word count, spelling, layout, bibliography, and file saving, worth a total of 14 points. The content section examines originality, argument, structure, coverage of topic, and integration of knowledge, worth a total of 25 points. Scores range from excellent to poor for each criteria.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
5 4 3 2 1 0 Excellent Good Average Below Poor Not averag complet e ed Word count Correct Incorrect (Exceed/under) (1) (0) Spelling/Typing Layout/neatness/ paragraphing Bibliography Excellent Average Poor Not done Saved Correctly Yes No
Section 2: Content (25)
5 4 3 2 1 0 Excellent Good Average Below Poor Not averag complet e ed Originality: the work is original, own opinion given, no evidence of plagiarism Argument: The argument is logical and coherent Structure: The different sections are logically structured Content: The topic is covered, all relevant information included Integration: Evidence of integrating knowledge in an authentic situation