IT-IMDBSYS31 Information Management 1

Grading Rubrics

Grading Rubric for Final Project

Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent

Very Incomplete 51% - 80% 81% - 90% Complete
incomplete expected complete complete expected
Software content document expected expected content
Application with wrong with wrong document document with
Project grammar. grammar. with good with very excellent
Proposal (1 - 2 pts.) (3 - 4 pts.) grammar. good grammar.
(10 pts.) (5 - 6 pts.) grammar. (9 - 10 pts.)
(7 - 8 pts.)
Requiremen Very Incomplete 51% - 80% 81% - 90% Complete
ts Gathering incomplete expected complete complete expected
Summary content document expected expected content
(10 pts.) with wrong with wrong document document with
grammar. grammar. with good with very excellent
(1 - 2 pts.) (3 - 4 pts.) grammar. good grammar.
(5 - 6 pts.) grammar. (9 - 10 pts.)
(7 - 8 pts.)
Business Very 51% - 80% 51% - 80% 81% - 90% Complete
Rules incomplete complete complete complete expected
(10 pts.) content expected expected expected content
with wrong document document document with
grammar. with good with good with very excellent
(1 - 2 pts.) grammar. grammar. good grammar.
(3 - 4 pts.) (5 - 6 pts.) grammar. (9 - 10 pts.)
(7 - 8 pts.)
Entity A lot of Few missing 51% - 80% 81% - 90% Entities are
Relationship entities are Entities. of the of the complete.
Diagram / missing. Less wrong entities are entities are ERD
Database Wrong use use of PKs reflected reflected building
Diagram of PKs and and FKS, an with few with few blocks are
(30 pts.) FKS, an relationship errors of errors of correctly
relationship strengths. using the using the used.
strengths. Less wrong ERD ERD Entities are
Wrong entity building building in 3NF.
entity relationship blocks. blocks.
relationship s. (13 - 18 (19 - 24 (25 - 30
s. Less missing pts.) pts.) pts.)
Missing relationship
relationship names.
names. (7 - 12 pts.)
 (1 - 6 pts.)
Data Very Few missing 51% - 80% 81% - 90% Complete
Dictionary incomplete table of the of the table
(10 pts.) table definitions. tables are tables are definitions.
definitions. (3 - 4 pts.) defined defined (9 - 10 pts.)
(1 - 2 pts.) with few with few
errors. errors
(5 - 6 pts.) (7 - 8 pts.)
User Design
Design Design
Interfacce Design Design specificatio
specificatio specificatio
(30 pts.) specificatio specificatio ns 81% -
ns 51% - ns 91% -
ns 25% or ns 26% - 90%
80% 100%
less 50% complete.
complete. complete.
complete. complete. (19 - 24
(13 - 18 (25 - 30
(1 - 6 pts.) (7 - 12 pts.) pts.)
pts.) pts.)

Grading Rubric for Individual Presentation

Sophisticated Competent Fair

(21-25 pts.) (11-20 pts.) (1-10 pts.)
Speaking The student The student was The student was often
and was poised  mostly audible inaudible and/or hesitant
Presentation and had clear and/or fluent on the and relied heavily on notes.
Skills articulation. topic, but: He/she made distracting
(25 pts.) He/she 1) speakers gestures with little or no
demonstrated demonstrated fair audience eye contact. A high
good volume, volume and/or eye level of discomfort with
and eye contact was broken public speaking was exuded.
contact. with audience; The presentation went over
Enthusiasm an 2) light the time allotment.
d confidence discomfort with publ
was exuded. ic speaking was
The exuded; and/or
presentation 3) the presentation
fit into the slightly went over
time the time allotment.
allotment.
Clarity, The student’s The student’s The student’s answer was
Articulation answer was answer was not so not so clear. He/she is not so
and Delivery clear. He/she is clear. He/she is not articulate and delivers the
of the articulate and so articulate and answer with no conviction.
Answer delivers the delivers the answer
(25 pts.) answer with with less conviction.
conviction.
Comprehens The answer is The answer is not so The answer is not direct to
iveness of direct to the direct to the point the point and is incomplete.
the Answers point and is and is just enough
/ Ideas complete. but not complete.
(25 pts.)
Contribution The student The student did not The student did not
/Support to contributed in contribute as heavily contribute to the project
the Team a valuable way as others but did and failed to meet
(25 pts.) to the project. meet all responsibilities. The student
The student is responsibilities. The does not identify key
also able to student is also able performance criteria of
articulate the to identify some key successful teams or draw
key performance criteria inference to own
performance of successful teams experience.
criteria of and/or  draw related
successful connections the
teams group performance.
and evaluate
the group
performance
accordingly.

Prepared by:

Neil A. Basabe, MIT, MPA

Instructor