Seminar 2: Source Evaluation Often times an historian wants to answer the why questions so that they can provide the facts of what has happened in the past. Bias is a very difficult concept for an historian but it is critical to ensure that the history is documented accurately. To more fully understand the past, the source that will be reviewed below are the fragmentary notes that Susan B Anthony left on the speech on coeducation in the winter of 1856-1857 titled Why the Sexes Should Be Educated Together (Anthony). Susan B Anthony: Why the Sexes Should be Educated Together These notes that were left behind were documented by an American social reformer and womens rights advocate who played an important role in womens suffrage movement by the name of Susan B. Anthony. She is preparing to speak to a group of men about how both female and males should be educated together. Susan B. Anthonys goal in her speech is to argue the importance to educate women and men together. Her primary point is that men and women are equal and there are situations where women are unmarried and need to be able to support themselves. If you look past being single she also wants to point out that women are sometimes put into situations where they become widowed or orphaned and they become obligated to provide primary support for the household. Source underlying values. In these notes, Susan B Anthony wants to be sure she gets her point across that women are equals and should not be inferior to men. She makes multiple points on the importance of women being able to support themselves if needed. Audience underlying values. Her notes indicates that the audience was not supportive of her views and she recognized that she would have to make a strong argument that women and men need to be educated together to advance the equalization of men and women.
Seminar 2: Source Evaluation3
Works Cited Anthony, S. B. (n.d.). Why the Sexes Should Be Educated Together (1856). In E. C. Dubois, & L. Dumenil, Through Women's Eyes: An American History with Documents (Fourth ed., pp. 260-261). Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin's.