Milestone 1 Review 1 Source Ide

1 Check if you have identified data to be collected.

A List of universities in UK, USA & EU wh
B Criteria to compare university.
C Audit reports from any professional body
D Student survey reports like national stud
E Alumni feedback.
QC 1 2 Check if you have known method to check reliability of sourc
A Ranking tables that most of the universit
B User reviews of the websites you are fina
C Source of data (In terms of websites - Par
D Authentic student surveys like NSS (Nati
E Recognition of professional body whose
F Quality requirements used by team 2 for

Milestone 2 Review 2 Data Co

1 Make sure you are using only reliable sources identified in QC
2 If you want to change any source then it should be verified as
3 Download data relevant to MSc project management only.
QC 2
4 Use MS Excel as a standard document format for compiling st
5 Use latest data available (in case of ranking tables and audit r
6 Person who is dealing with team 2 for alumni data should ens

Milestone 3 Review 3 Data Analysis/I

Data should be collected from different resources working ind

1
segregation.

2 Data Segregation should be done and formated as per set crite

3 While downloading ranking tables, following points should b

A World ranking of the university

QC 3
QC 3 B Regional ranking of the university
4 Universities finalised for comparison must be
A Universities with higher ranking/reputat
B Universities with lower ranking/reputati
5 SWOT should follow the detailed structure as per format.
6 Draft should follow the standard report format
7 Final report should follow standard format
 Source Identification
data to be collected.
niversities in UK, USA & EU which provides MSc. Project management.
o compare university.
ports from any professional body like QAA, TEF.
urvey reports like national students survey.
eedback.
hod to check reliability of sources.
tables that most of the universities use.
ews of the websites you are finalizing as your sources.
data (In terms of websites - Partners) like British Council, DAAD.
c student surveys like NSS (National Student Survey).
ion of professional body whose audit reports are being used.
equirements used by team 2 for alumni data.

Data Collection
reliable sources identified in QC 1.
urce then it should be verified as per QC 1.
Sc project management only.
ocument format for compiling statistical data.
ase of ranking tables and audit reports from professional body).
am 2 for alumni data should ensure that the data collected aligns with QC 1.

Data Analysis/Implementation

m different resources working independantly and transfered to the dedicated personnel for

one and formated as per set criteria.

ables, following points should be considered and data should be collected accordingly.

nking of the university

ranking of the university
parison must be
ies with higher ranking/reputation than Lancaster
ies with lower ranking/reputation than Lancaster
iled structure as per format.
ard report format
ndard format
Change Management TA/CR/01

Data Format 1 TA/DATA/01

Data Format 1 TA/DATA/01

Data Format 2 TA/DATA/02