You are on page 1of 14

A

PEI E§
AI

ET

§A
¢ONTIKH

¢O
™ 1963
£O
OP
∞ÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤Ó· ‰fiÓÙÈ·: √ÚıÔ‰ÔÓÙÈ΋ ÚÔÛ¤ÁÁÈÛË
¶. ¶∞¡√™
ªÂÙ·Ù˘¯È·Îfi˜ ºÔÈÙËÙ‹˜, ∂ÚÁ·ÛÙ‹ÚÈÔ √ÚıÔ‰ÔÓÙÈ΋˜, ∆Ì‹Ì· √‰ÔÓÙÈ·ÙÚÈ΋˜, ∞ÚÈÛÙÔÙ¤ÏÂÈÔ ¶·ÓÂÈÛÙ‹ÌÈÔ £ÂÛÛ·ÏÔӛ΢.

Tooth ankylosis: Orthodontic implications


P. PANOS
Postgraduate Student, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

¶EPI§HæH ABSTRACT

∏ ·Á·ψÛË ÙˆÓ ‰ÔÓÙÈÒÓ ·ÔÙÂÏ› ηٿÛÙ·ÛË Ô˘ ÌÔÚ› Ó· Tooth ankylosis is a condition, which may lead to an occlusal
Ô‰ËÁ‹ÛÂÈ ÛÂ Û˘ÁÎÏÂÈÛȷ΋ ‰È·Ù·Ú·¯‹. ∏ ·ÈÙÈÔÏÔÁ›· Ù˘ ·Ú·- abnormality. The etiology is unknown although different and
̤ÓÂÈ ¿ÁÓˆÛÙË, ·ÚfiÏÔ Ô˘ ηٿ ηÈÚÔ‡˜ ¤¯Ô˘Ó ·ÚÔ˘ÛÈ·ÛÙ› often contradicting opinions have been presented. It prevails
ÔÈΛϘ Î·È Û˘¯Ó¿ ·ÓÙÈÎÚÔ˘fiÌÂÓ˜ ·fi„ÂȘ. ∂ÌÊ·Ó›˙ÂÙ·È on primary teeth, characterized by progressive infraocclusion.
Ankylosis on permanent teeth is less frequent and is associated
΢ڛˆ˜ ÛÙ· ÓÂÔÁÈÏ¿ ‰fiÓÙÈ· Î·È ¯·Ú·ÎÙËÚ›˙ÂÙ·È ·fi ÚÔ˚Ô‡Û·
with trauma and impaction. Management of the affected tooth
·Ú·ÌÔÓ‹ ÙÔ˘ ˘·›ÙÈÔ˘ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡ οو ·fi ÙÔ Â›Â‰Ô Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈ-
ranges from simple observation to extraction. A protocol
Û˘ (·ÙÂÏ‹˜ Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈÛË). ∏ ·Á·ψÛË ÛÙË ÌfiÓÈÌË Ô‰ÔÓÙÔÊ˘˝·
assisting in the proper diagnosis and treatment is presented.
Â›Ó·È ÏÈÁfiÙÂÚÔ Û˘¯Ó‹ Î·È Û˘Û¯ÂÙ›˙ÂÙ·È Ì ÙÚ·‡Ì· Î·È ¤ÁÎÏÂÈÛÙ· KEY WORDS: Tooth ankylosis, infraocclusion, secondary
‰fiÓÙÈ·. ∏ ·ÓÙÈÌÂÙÒÈÛË ÙÔ˘ ÂÌÏÂÎfiÌÂÓÔ˘ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡ Î˘Ì·›ÓÂÙ·È retention, submersion.
·fi ·Ï‹ ·Ú·Ù‹ÚËÛË Ì¤¯ÚÈ ÂÍ·ÁˆÁ‹. ¶·ÚÔ˘ÛÈ¿˙ÂÙ·È ÚˆÙfi- Hel. Orthod. Rev. 2003; 6: 75-88
ÎÔÏÏÔ ·ÓÙÈÌÂÙÒÈÛ˘ Ì ÛÙfi¯Ô ÙË ÛˆÛÙ‹ ‰È¿ÁÓˆÛË Î·È ıÂÚ·- Received: 17.12.2002 – Accepted: 22.01.2003
›·.
§∂•∂π™ ∫§∂π¢π∞: ∞Á·ψÛË ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡, ·ÙÂÏ‹˜ Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈÛË, ‰Â˘-
ÙÂÚÔÁÂÓ‹˜ Û˘ÁÎÚ¿ÙËÛË, ÂÌ‚‡ıÈÛË.
∂ÏÏ. √ÚıÔ‰. ∂Èı. 2003; 6: 75-88 INTRODUCTION
¶·ÚÂÏ‹ÊıË: 17.12.2002 – ŒÁÈÓ ‰ÂÎÙ‹: 22.01.2003
Tooth ankylosis can be either the cause of an occlusal
abnormality requiring orthodontic intervention and/or
results in complications during orthodontic treatment.
EI™A°ø°H Therefore early diagnosis is important for the proper
management of the condition. The aim of this paper is
∏ ·Á·ψÛË ÌÔÚ› Ó· ·ÔÙÂÏ› ·ÈÙ›· Û˘ÁÎÏÂÈÛȷ΋˜ to address some aspects of tooth ankylosis as well as
‰È·Ù·Ú·¯‹˜ Ô˘ ··ÈÙ› ÔÚıÔ‰ÔÓÙÈ΋ ·Ú¤Ì‚·ÛË impaction, and their orthodontic treatment.
ηÈ/‹ ¤¯ÂÈ ˆ˜ ·ÔÙ¤ÏÂÛÌ· ÂÈÏÔΤ˜ ηٿ ÙË ‰È¿ÚÎÂÈ·
Definition
Ù˘ ÔÚıÔ‰ÔÓÙÈ΋˜ ıÂÚ·›·˜. °È· ÙÔ ÏfiÁÔ ·˘Ùfi, ›ӷÈ
Tooth ankylosis may be defined as an anatomical
··Ú·›ÙËÙË Ë ÚÒÈÌË ‰È¿ÁÓˆÛË Ù˘ ηٿÛÙ·Û˘ ÒÛÙ fusion of alveolar bone with tooth cementum. It can
Ó· ·ÓÙÈÌÂÙˆÈÛÙ› ·Ó¿ÏÔÁ·. ™ÎÔfi˜ ÙÔ˘ ¿ÚıÚÔ˘ Â›Ó·È occur at any time during eruption either before or after
Ó· Û˘˙ËÙ‹ÛÂÈ ÔÚÈṲ̂ӷ ı¤Ì·Ù· Û¯ÂÙÈο Ì ٷ ·ÁÎ˘Ïˆ- the tooth emerges into the oral cavity (Brearley and
̤ӷ Î·È Ù· ¤ÁÎÏÂÈÛÙ· ‰fiÓÙÈ· Î·È ÙËÓ ÔÚıÔ‰ÔÓÙÈ΋ McKibben, 1972).
ÙÔ˘˜ ·ÓÙÈÌÂÙÒÈÛË.

OÚÈÛÌfi˜ ETIOLOGY
∞Á·ψÛË ÔÚ›˙ÂÙ·È Ë ·Ó·ÙÔÌÈ΋ Û‡ÓÙËÍË Ê·ÙÓÈ·ÎÔ‡
ÔÛÙÔ‡ Ì ÙËÓ ÔÛÙ½ÓË ÙÔ˘ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡. ªÔÚ› Ó· ÂÈÛ˘Ì- A tooth is considered ankylosed when part of its root

E§§HNIKH OP£O¢ONTIKH E¶I£EøPH™H 2003 ñ TOMO™ 6 75 HELLENIC ORTHODONTIC REVIEW 2003 ñ VOLUME 6
A
PEI E§
AI

ET

§A
¢ONTIKH

¢O
¶. ¶ANO™ AÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤Ó· ‰fiÓÙÈ·: OÚıÔ‰ÔÓÙÈ΋ ÚÔÛ¤ÁÁÈÛË P. PANOS Tooth ankylosis: Orthodontic implications

™ 1963
£O
OP
‚› ÔÔÈ·‰‹ÔÙ ÛÙÈÁÌ‹ ηٿ ÙËÓ ·Ó·ÙÔÏ‹ ÙÔ˘ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡, becomes fused to the surrounding alveolar bone.
ÚÈÓ ‹ ÌÂÙ¿ ÙËÓ ÂÌÊ¿ÓÈÛ‹ ÙÔ˘ ÛÙË ÛÙÔÌ·ÙÈ΋ ÎÔÈÏfiÙËÙ· Histologically, areas of cemental resorption are found,
(Brearley Î·È McKibben, 1972). repaired by calcified tissue that is in continuity with
alveolar bone (Brearley and McKibben, 1972;
Thornton and Zimmermann, 1965; Vorhies et al.,
AITIO§O°IA
1952). The etiology of ankylosis is essentially
unknown, but several theories have been proposed.
Biederman (1962) suggested the disturbed local
∞ÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤ÓÔ ıˆÚÂ›Ù·È ¤Ó· ‰fiÓÙÈ fiÙ·Ó ÙÌ‹Ì· Ù˘ Ú›˙·˜ metabolism theory. Normally the periodontal ligament
ÙÔ˘ Û˘ÓÂÓÒÓÂÙ·È ÌÂ ÙÔ ÂÚÈ‚¿ÏÏÔÓ Ê·ÙÓÈ·Îfi ÔÛÙÔ‡Ó. separates the root cementum from the alveolar bone.
πÛÙÔÏÔÁÈο ·Ó¢ڛÛÎÔÓÙ·È ÂÚÈÔ¯¤˜ ÔÛÙÂ˚ÓÈ΋˜ ·ÔÚÚfi- This relationship is also present during root resorption
ÊËÛ˘ Ô˘ ¤¯Ô˘Ó ·ÔηٷÛÙ·ı› Ì ÂÓ·Û‚ÂÛÙȈ̤ÓÔ of a deciduous tooth, since resorption precedes the
ÈÛÙfi, Ô ÔÔ›Ô˜ ‚Ú›ÛÎÂÙ·È ÛÂ Û˘Ó¤¯ÂÈ· Ì ÙÔ Ê·ÙÓÈ·Îfi disappearance of the periodontal ligament. In the case
ÔÛÙÔ‡Ó (Brearley Î·È McKibben, 1972; Thornton Î·È of disturbed local metabolism periodontal ligament
Zimmermann, 1965; Vorhies Î·È Û˘Ó., 1952). ∏ disappearance precedes root resorption.
·ÈÙÈÔÏÔÁ›· Ù˘ ·Á·ψÛ˘ Â›Ó·È Ô˘ÛÈ·ÛÙÈο ¿ÁÓˆÛÙË, Consequently cementum and alveolar bone would
¤¯Ô˘Ó, fï˜, ÚÔÙ·ı› ‰È¿ÊÔÚ˜ ıˆڛ˜. come into contact making ankylosis possible
√ Biederman (1962) ÚfiÙÂÈÓ ÙË ıˆڛ· Ù˘ ‰È·Ù·Ú·- (Biederman, 1956, 1962).
¯‹˜ ÙÔ˘ ÙÔÈÎÔ‡ ÌÂÙ·‚ÔÏÈÛÌÔ‡. º˘ÛÈÔÏÔÁÈο Ô ÂÚÈÔ- Kurol and Magnusson (1984) suggest that the
etiologic factor is not functional but a developmental
‰ÔÓÙÈÎfi˜ Û‡Ó‰ÂÛÌÔ˜ ‰È·¯ˆÚ›˙ÂÈ ÙËÓ ÔÛÙ½ÓË Ù˘ Ú›˙·˜
disturbance. This is supported by Via (1964), whose
·fi ÙÔ Ê·ÙÓÈ·Îfi ÔÛÙÔ‡Ó. ∏ Û¯¤ÛË ·˘Ù‹ ‰ÂÓ ˘Ê›ÛÙ·Ù·È data showed a high frequency of ankylosed and
ηٿ ÙËÓ ·ÔÚÚfiÊËÛË Ù˘ Ú›˙·˜ ÓÂÔÁÈÏÔ‡ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡, submerged teeth among members of the same family
·ÊÔ‡ Ë ·ÔÚÚfiÊËÛË ÚÔËÁÂ›Ù·È Ù˘ ÂÍ·Ê¿ÓÈÛ˘ ÙÔ˘ indicating a genetic tendency.
ÂÚÈÔ‰ÔÓÙÈÎÔ‡ Û˘Ó‰¤ÛÌÔ˘. ™ÙËÓ ÂÚ›ÙˆÛË Ù˘ ‰È·Ù·- Traumatic injury of the alveolar bone or of the
Ú·¯‹˜ ÙÔ˘ ÙÔÈÎÔ‡ ÌÂÙ·‚ÔÏÈÛÌÔ‡, Ë ÂÍ·Ê¿ÓÈÛË ÙÔ˘ periodontal ligament has been suggested as causative
ÂÚÈÔ‰ÔÓÙÈÎÔ‡ Û˘Ó‰¤ÛÌÔ˘ ÚÔËÁÂ›Ù·È Ù˘ ÚÈ˙È΋˜ ·ÔÚ- factors by many authors (Kracke, 1975; Henderson,
ÚfiÊËÛ˘. ™˘ÓÂÒ˜, Ë ÔÛÙ½ÓË Î·È ÙÔ Ê·ÙÓÈ·Îfi ÔÛÙÔ‡Ó 1979). The rational behind this theory was that if a
¤Ú¯ÔÓÙ·È Û Â·Ê‹ ÂÈÙÚ¤ÔÓÙ·˜, ¤ÙÛÈ, ÙË ‰ËÌÈÔ˘ÚÁ›· tear occurs in the continuity of the ligament, direct
·Á·ψÛ˘ (Biederman, 1956, 1962). contact between alveolar bone and cementum
√È Kurol Î·È Magnusson (1984) ·Ó·Ê¤ÚÔ˘Ó fiÙÈ Ô develops. It has been hypothesized that during the
·ÈÙÈÔÏÔÁÈÎfi˜ ·Ú¿ÁÔÓÙ·˜ ‰ÂÓ Â›Ó·È ÏÂÈÙÔ˘ÚÁÈ΋, ·ÏÏ¿ regeneration process ankylosis may occur. One form
of such traumatic injury was considered to be occlusal
·Ó·Ù˘Íȷ΋ ‰È·Ù·Ú·¯‹. ∞˘Ùfi ˘ÔÛÙËÚ›˙ÂÙ·È ·fi ÙÔÓ
trauma (by excessive masticatory force). According to
Via (1964), Ù· ‰Â‰Ô̤ӷ ÙÔ˘ ÔÔ›Ô˘ ‰Â›¯ÓÔ˘Ó ·˘ÍË- this theory, the selectivity of the occurrence of ankylosis
̤ÓË Û˘¯ÓfiÙËÙ· ·ÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤ÓˆÓ Î·È ÂÌ‚˘ıÈÛÌ¤ÓˆÓ in the dental arches was explained by the greater
‰ÔÓÙÈÒÓ Û ̤ÏË Ù˘ ›‰È·˜ ÔÈÎÔÁ¤ÓÂÈ·˜ ˘Ô‰ÂÈÎÓ‡Ô- masticatory forces applied to the molars. But the theory
ÓÙ·˜, ¤ÙÛÈ, Ì›· ÁÂÓÂÙÈ΋ Ù¿ÛË. could not explain why permanent teeth are less
∆Ô ÙÚ·‡Ì· ÙÔ˘ Ê·ÙÓÈ·ÎÔ‡ ÔÛÙÔ‡ ‹ ÙÔ˘ ÂÚÈÔ‰ÔÓÙÈÎÔ‡ frequently affected even though they are subjected to
Û˘Ó‰¤ÛÌÔ˘ ¤¯ÂÈ ÚÔÙ·ı› ˆ˜ ·ÈÙÈÔÏÔÁÈÎfi˜ ·Ú¿ÁÔ- greater masticatory forces (Biederman, 1956;
ÓÙ·˜ ·fi ÔÏÏÔ‡˜ Û˘ÁÁÚ·Ê›˜ (Kracke, 1975; Henderson, 1979).
Henderson, 1979). ∆Ô ÛÎÂÙÈÎfi ·˘Ù‹˜ Ù˘ ıˆڛ·˜ Furthermore, the effort to experimentally induce
‹Ù·Ó fiÙÈ ÂÊfiÛÔÓ ÂÈÛ˘Ì‚Â› Ú‹ÍË Ù˘ Û˘Ó¤¯ÂÈ·˜ ÙÔ˘ ankylosis, either by hyper-occlusion or direct trauma to
Û˘Ó‰¤ÛÌÔ˘, ‰ËÌÈÔ˘ÚÁÂ›Ù·È ¿ÌÂÛË Â·Ê‹ ÌÂٷ͇ Ê·Ù- the root, using a rotating bur showed no evidence of
ÓÈ·ÎÔ‡ ÔÛÙÔ‡ Î·È ÔÛÙ½Ó˘. ÀÔÙ›ıÂÙ·È ÏÔÈfiÓ fiÙÈ Î·Ù¿ ankylosis (Rubin et al., 1984). The only way ankylosis
was induced successfully was by tooth luxation or by
ÙË ‰È·‰Èηۛ· Ù˘ ÂԇψÛ˘ ÌÔÚ› Ó· ÂÈÛ˘Ì‚Â›
thermal injury to the apex (Yilmaz et al., 1981).
·Á·ψÛË. ª›· ÌÔÚÊ‹ Ù¤ÙÔÈ·˜ ÙÚ·˘Ì·ÙÈ΋˜ ‚Ï¿‚˘ Avulsed teeth, which have been replanted, or
ıˆڋıËΠÙÔ ÙÚ·‡Ì· Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈÛ˘ (·fi ˘ÂÚ‚ÔÏÈ΋ autotransplanted may become ankylosed. According
‰‡Ó·ÌË Ì¿ÛËÛ˘). ™‡Ìʈӷ Ì ÙË ıˆڛ· ·˘Ù‹, Ë to Andreasen (1981) the development of such
ÂÈÏÂÎÙÈÎfiÙËÙ· Ù˘ ÂÌÊ¿ÓÈÛ˘ ·Á·ψÛ˘ ÛÙ· Ô‰ÔÓÙÈο ankylosis is associated with injuries sustained by the
ÙfiÍ· ·Ô‰fiıËΠÛÙȘ ÌÂÁ·Ï‡ÙÂÚ˜ Ì·ÛËÙÈΤ˜ ‰˘Ó¿ÌÂȘ periodontal ligament during the extra-alveolar period
Ô˘ ·ÛÎÔ‡ÓÙ·È ÛÙÔ˘˜ ÁÔÌÊ›Ô˘˜. ∏ ıˆڛ·, fï˜, (Andreasen, 1981).

E§§HNIKH OP£O¢ONTIKH E¶I£EøPH™H 2003 ñ TOMO™ 6 76 HELLENIC ORTHODONTIC REVIEW 2003 ñ VOLUME 6
A
PEI E§
AI

ET

§A
¢ONTIKH

¢O
¶. ¶ANO™ AÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤Ó· ‰fiÓÙÈ·: OÚıÔ‰ÔÓÙÈ΋ ÚÔÛ¤ÁÁÈÛË P. PANOS Tooth ankylosis: Orthodontic implications

™ 1963
£O
OP
·˘Ù‹ ‰ÂÓ ÌÔÚÔ‡Û ӷ ÂÍËÁ‹ÛÂÈ ÁÈ·Ù› Ù· ÌfiÓÈÌ· ‰fiÓÙÈ· Finally a direct relationship between congenitally
ÚÔÛ‚¿ÏÏÔÓÙ·È Ôχ Û·ÓÈfiÙÂÚ·, ·ÚfiÏÔ Ô˘ ÂÎÙ›- missing premolars and ankylosed deciduous molars
ıÂÓÙ·È Û ·˘ÍË̤Ó˜ Ì·ÛËÙÈΤ˜ ‰˘Ó¿ÌÂȘ (Biederman, has been reported (Brearley and McKibben, 1972;
1956; Henderson, 1979). Kula et al., 1984). Histologic studies showed that in
∂ÈϤÔÓ, Ë ÚÔÛ¿ıÂÈ· ‰ËÌÈÔ˘ÚÁ›·˜ ÂÈÚ·Ì·ÙÈ΋˜ deciduous teeth without a permanent successor,
·Á·ψÛ˘ ›Ù Ì ˘ÂÚÛ‡ÁÎÏÂÈÛË Â›Ù Ì ¿ÌÂÛÔ ÙÚ·‡- ankylosis occurred primarily in the vicinity of the apical
Ì· ÛÙË Ú›˙· ¯ÚËÛÈÌÔÔÈÒÓÙ·˜ ÂÁÁÏ˘Ê›‰· ‰ÂÓ ¤‰ÂÈÍ foramen (Thornton and Zimmermann, 1965).
ÛÙÔȯ›· ·Á·ψÛ˘ (Rubin Î·È Û˘Ó., 1984). √
ÌfiÓÔ˜ ÂÈÙ˘¯Ë̤ÓÔ˜ ÙÚfiÔ˜ ÂÈÚ·Ì·ÙÈ΋˜ ·Á·ψÛ˘
PREVALENCE
‹Ù·Ó Ì ÂÍ¿ÚıÚˆÛË ÙÔ˘ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡ ‹ Ì ıÂÚÌÈÎfi ÙÚ·‡Ì·
ÛÙÔ ·ÎÚÔÚÚ›˙ÈÔ (Yilmaz Î·È Û˘Ó., 1981).
According to recent studies the incidence of ankylosis
∂ÎÁÔÌʈ̤ӷ ‰fiÓÙÈ· Ô˘ ¤¯Ô˘Ó Â·ÓÂÌÊ˘Ù¢ı› ‹
in the deciduous dentition varies from 1.3 % to 9.9%
·˘ÙÔÌÂÙ·ÌÔÛ¯Â˘ı› ÌÔÚ› Ó· ·ÁÎ˘ÏˆıÔ‡Ó. ™‡Ìʈӷ (Mueller et al., 1983). Differences in age, ethnic
Ì ÙÔÓ Andreasen (1981), Ë ÂÌÊ¿ÓÈÛË Ù¤ÙÔÈ·˜ ·Á·- background and diagnostic criteria account for the
ψÛ˘ Û¯ÂÙ›˙ÂÙ·È Ì ÙÚ·‡Ì·Ù· ÙÔ˘ ÂÚÈÔ‰ÔÓÙÈÎÔ‡ Û˘Ó- discrepancies among different studies. Any deciduous
‰¤ÛÌÔ˘ ηٿ ÙÔ ¯ÚfiÓÔ Ô˘ ÙÔ ‰fiÓÙÈ ‚ÚÈÛÎfiÙ·Ó ÂÎÙfi˜ tooth can become ankylosed but deciduous are almost
Ê·ÙÓ›Ô˘ (Andreasen, 1981). exclusively involved (Albers, 1986).
∆¤ÏÔ˜, ·Ó·Ê¤ÚÂÙ·È ¿ÌÂÛË Û¯¤ÛË ÌÂٷ͇ Û˘ÁÁÂÓÒ˜ Mandibular deciduous molars tend to be ankylosed
ÂÏÏÂÈfiÓÙˆÓ ÚÔÁÔÌÊ›ˆÓ Î·È ·ÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤ÓˆÓ ÓÂÔÁÈÏÒÓ more frequently than maxillary deciduous molars at a
ÁÔÌÊ›ˆÓ (Brearley Î·È McKibben, 1972; Kula Î·È ratio 8-1 (Krakowiak, 1978; Brown, 1966). The
Û˘Ó., 1984). πÛÙÔÏÔÁÈΤ˜ ÌÂϤÙ˜ ¤‰ÂÈÍ·Ó fiÙÈ Û ÓÂÔ- mandibular first deciduous molar is the tooth most often
ÁÈÏ¿ ‰fiÓÙÈ· Ô˘ ‰ÂÓ ¤¯Ô˘Ó ÌfiÓÈÌ· ‰È¿‰Ô¯· Ë ·Á·- affected (Brearley and McKibben, 1972; Kula et al.,
ψÛË ÂÈÛ˘Ó¤‚Ë ·Ú¯Èο ÎÔÓÙ¿ ÛÙÔ ·ÎÚÔÚÚÈ˙ÈÎfi ÙÚ‹Ì· 1984; Krakowiak, 1978; Messer and Cline, 1980).
(Thornton Î·È Zimmermann, 1965). It produces moderate infraocclusion and it ankyloses at
an earlier age (Krakowiak, 1978). Other investigators
reported the mandibular second deciduous molar as
the most frequently involved tooth (Thornton and
E¶I¶O§A™MO™
Zimmermann, 1965; Biederman, 1956, 1962;
Brown, 1966). This difference is most probably due to
™‡Ìʈӷ Ì ÚfiÛÊ·Ù˜ ÌÂϤÙ˜ Ë Â›ÙˆÛË Ù˘ ·Á·- the fact that first mandibular deciduous molars ankylose
ψÛ˘ ÛÙË ÓÂÔÁÈÏ‹ Ô‰ÔÓÙÔÊ˘˝· Î˘Ì·›ÓÂÙ·È ·fi 1.3% earlier, produce less infraocclusion and usually
ˆ˜ 9.9% (Mueller Î·È Û˘Ó., 1983). ¢È·ÊÔÚ¤˜ ÛÙËÓ exfoliate on time, which means that they may go
ËÏÈΛ·, ÙÔ ÂıÓÈÎfi ˘fi‚·ıÚÔ Î·È Ù· ‰È·ÁÓˆÛÙÈο ÎÚÈ- undetected. In contrast, second mandibular primary
Ù‹ÚÈ· ÂÍËÁÔ‡Ó ÙȘ ‰È·ÊÔÚ¤˜ ÌÂٷ͇ ÌÂÏÂÙÒÓ. √ÔÈÔ- molars produce more severe infraocclusion and a
‰‹ÔÙ ÓÂÔÁÈÏfi ‰fiÓÙÈ ÌÔÚ› Ó· ·ÁÎ˘Ïˆı›, fï˜ ÔÈ slight delay in the eruption of their permanent
ÓÂÔÁÈÏÔ› ÁÔÌÊ›ÔÈ Â›Ó·È Ù· ‰fiÓÙÈ· Ô˘ ηْ ÂÍÔ¯‹Ó successors (Kula et al., 1984). Maxillary deciduous
·ÚÔ˘ÛÈ¿˙Ô˘Ó ·˘Ùfi ÙÔ Ê·ÈÓfiÌÂÓÔ (Albers, 1986). molars tend to ankylose earlier than mandibular
√È Î¿Ùˆ ÓÂÔÁÈÏÔ› ÁÔÌÊ›ÔÈ ·ÚÔ˘ÛÈ¿˙Ô˘Ó Ù¿ÛË ·Á·- primary molars with usually, worse prognosis (Brearley
ψÛ˘ Û˘¯ÓfiÙÂÚ· ·fi ÙÔ˘˜ ¿Óˆ ÓÂÔÁÈÏÔ‡˜ ÁÔÌÊ›Ô˘˜ and McKibben, 1972).
Ì ۯ¤ÛË 8 ÚÔ˜ 1 (Krakowiak, 1978; Brown, Ankylosis of multiple teeth is also common (Kula et al.,
1966). √ ÚÒÙÔ˜ οو ÓÂÔÁÈÏfi˜ ÁÔÌʛԘ Â›Ó·È ÙÔ 1984).
There is no significant difference in the prevalence of
‰fiÓÙÈ Ô˘ ÚÔÛ‚¿ÏÏÂÙ·È Û˘¯ÓfiÙÂÚ· (Brearley ηÈ
affected dentition between males and females at any
McKibben, 1972; Kula Î·È Û˘Ó., 1984; Krakowiak,
age (Brown, 1966). Caucasians and Hispanics have
1978; Messer Î·È Cline, 1980). ¢ËÌÈÔ˘ÚÁ› ·ÙÂÏ‹ a greater incidence of ankylosis of deciduous teeth
Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈÛË Ì¤ÙÚÈÔ˘ ‚·ıÌÔ‡ Î·È ·Á΢ÏÒÓÂÙ·È Û ÌÈÎÚfi- than Blacks and Orientals (Mueller et al., 1983;
ÙÂÚË ËÏÈΛ· (Krakowiak, 1978). ÕÏÏÔÈ ÂÚ¢ÓËÙ¤˜ Krakowiak, 1978).
·Ó·Ê¤ÚÔ˘Ó fiÙÈ ÙÔ ‰fiÓÙÈ Ô˘ ÂÌÊ·Ó›˙ÂÈ ·Á·ψÛË Ankylosis may affect permanent teeth, but primary
Û˘¯ÓfiÙÂÚ· Â›Ó·È Ô ‰Â‡ÙÂÚÔ˜ οو ÓÂÔÁÈÏfi˜ ÁÔÌʛԘ teeth are involved approximately 10 times more
(Thornton Î·È Zimmermann, 1965; Biederman, frequently than permanent teeth (Biederman, 1956).
1956, 1962; Brown, 1966). ∏ ‰È·ÊÔÚ¿ ·˘Ù‹ ÔÊ›- The permanent teeth that most frequently become

E§§HNIKH OP£O¢ONTIKH E¶I£EøPH™H 2003 ñ TOMO™ 6 77 HELLENIC ORTHODONTIC REVIEW 2003 ñ VOLUME 6
A
PEI E§
AI

ET

§A
¢ONTIKH

¢O
¶. ¶ANO™ AÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤Ó· ‰fiÓÙÈ·: OÚıÔ‰ÔÓÙÈ΋ ÚÔÛ¤ÁÁÈÛË P. PANOS Tooth ankylosis: Orthodontic implications

™ 1963
£O
OP
ÏÂÙ·È Ì¿ÏÏÔÓ ÛÙÔ ÁÂÁÔÓfi˜ fiÙÈ ÔÈ Î¿Ùˆ ÚÒÙÔÈ ÓÂÔÁÈÏÔ› ankylosed are the mandibular and maxillary first
ÁÔÌÊ›ÔÈ ·Á΢ÏÒÓÔÓÙ·È ÓˆÚ›ÙÂÚ·, ‰ËÌÈÔ˘ÚÁÔ‡Ó ÌÈÎÚfi- molars followed by maxillary canines and incisors
ÙÂÚË ·ÙÂÏ‹ Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈÛË Î·È Û˘Ó‹ıˆ˜ ·Ô›ÙÔ˘Ó ¤ÁηÈ- (Albers 1986; Messer and Cline, 1980).
Ú·, ÁÂÁÔÓfi˜ Ô˘ ÛËÌ·›ÓÂÈ fiÙÈ ÌÔÚ› Ë Î·Ù¿ÛÙ·ÛË Ó· Certain endocrine conditions and congenital diseases,
ÌË ‰È·ÁÓˆÛı›. ∞ÓÙ›ıÂÙ·, ÔÈ ‰Â‡ÙÂÚÔÈ Î¿Ùˆ ÓÂÔÁÈÏÔ› like cleidocranial dysostosis and ectodermal dysplasia
ÁÔÌÊ›ÔÈ ‰ËÌÈÔ˘ÚÁÔ‡Ó ·ÙÂÏ‹ Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈÛË ÛÔ‚·ÚfiÙÂÚÔ˘ have been linked to a high incidence of tooth ankylosis
and the subsequent submergence of the involved
‚·ıÌÔ‡ Î·È Î·ı˘ÛÙÂÚÔ‡Ó ÂÏ·ÊÚ¿ ÙËÓ ·Ó·ÙÔÏ‹ ÙˆÓ
primary teeth (Pedersen and Hallett, 1994).
ÌÔÓ›ÌˆÓ ‰È·‰fi¯ˆÓ ÙÔ˘˜ (Kula Î·È Û˘Ó., 1984). √È Another study showed that infraoccluded deciduous
¿Óˆ ÓÂÔÁÈÏÔ› ÁÔÌÊ›ÔÈ ¤¯Ô˘Ó Ù¿ÛË ·Á·ψÛ˘ ÓˆÚ›ÙÂ- molars exhibit on average a slight delay in the eruption
Ú· ·fi ÙÔ˘˜ οو ÓÂÔÁÈÏÔ‡˜ ÁÔÌÊ›Ô˘˜, Û˘ÓËı¤ÛÙÂÚ· of the permanent successors, while deciduous molars
‰Â Ë ÚfiÁÓˆÛ‹ ÙÔ˘˜ Â›Ó·È ¯ÂÈÚfiÙÂÚË (Brearley Î·È without a permanent successor did not exfoliate
McKibben, 1972). spontaneously and showed progressive infraocclusion
™˘Ó‹ı˘ Â›Ó·È Î·È Ë ÔÏÏ·Ï‹ ·Á·ψÛË ‰ÔÓÙÈÒÓ (Kurol and Thilander, 1984)
(Kula Î·È Û˘Ó., 1984). Finally, there is a higher prevalence of submerged
√ ÂÈÔÏ·ÛÌfi˜ ÙˆÓ ÚÔÛ‚·ÏÏfiÌÂÓˆÓ ‰ÔÓÙÈÒÓ ÌÂٷ͇ deciduous molars in cases where the successor teeth
·Ó‰ÚÒÓ Î·È Á˘Ó·ÈÎÒÓ Î¿ı ËÏÈΛ·˜ ‰ÂÓ ·ÚÔ˘ÛÈ¿˙ÂÈ are congenitally absent (Brearley and McKibben,
ÛËÌ·ÓÙÈΤ˜ ‰È·ÊÔÚ¤˜ (Brown, 1966). √È ∫·˘Î¿ÛÈÔÈ 1972; Kula et al., 1984; Brown, 1966).
Î·È ÔÈ ÈÛ·ÓÈ΋˜ ηٷÁˆÁ‹˜ ·ÚÔ˘ÛÈ¿˙Ô˘Ó ˘„ËÏfiÙÂÚË
Â›ÙˆÛË ·Á·ψÛ˘ ÓÂÔÁÈÏÒÓ ‰ÔÓÙÈÒÓ ·fi ÙÔ˘˜
DIAGNOSIS
·ÊÚÈηÓÈ΋˜ ηٷÁˆÁ‹˜ Î·È ÙÔ˘˜ ∞ÛÈ¿Ù˜ (Muller ηÈ
Û˘Ó., 1983; Krakowiak, 1978). During the clinical examination, the suspected tooth is
∏ ·Á·ψÛË ÌÔÚ› Ó· ÚÔÛ‚¿ÏÂÈ ÌfiÓÈÌ· ‰fiÓÙÈ·, usually found to be immobile with its occlusal surface
fï˜ Ù· ÓÂÔÁÈÏ¿ ÂÌϤÎÔÓÙ·È Û¯Â‰fiÓ 10 ÊÔÚ¤˜ being below the functional occlusal plane. Any tooth
Û˘¯ÓfiÙÂÚ· ·fi Ù· ÌfiÓÈÌ· ‰fiÓÙÈ· (Biederman, 1956). that reached the occlusal plane and subsequently
∆· ÌfiÓÈÌ· ‰fiÓÙÈ· Ô˘ ÂÌÊ·Ó›˙Ô˘Ó Û˘¯ÓfiÙÂÚ· ·Á·ψ- drops out of occlusion should be considered ankylosed
ÛË Â›Ó·È Î·Ù¿ ÛÂÈÚ¿ Û˘¯ÓfiÙËÙ·˜ ÔÈ Î¿Ùˆ Î·È ÔÈ ¿Óˆ (Vorhies et al., 1952; Albers, 1986; Messer and
ÚÒÙÔÈ ÁÔÌÊ›ÔÈ, ÔÈ ¿Óˆ ΢Ófi‰ÔÓÙ˜ Î·È ÔÈ ÙÔÌ›˜ Cline, 1980; Pilo et al., 1989). Mobility test can be
(Albers, 1986; Messer Î·È Cline, 1980). performed by direct finger pressure or by the use of a
√ÚÈṲ̂Ó˜ ÂÓ‰ÔÎÚÈÓÈΤ˜ ‰È·Ù·Ú·¯¤˜ Î·È Û˘ÁÁÂÓ›˜ periodontometer (Andersson et al., 1994). The healthy
ÓfiÛÔÈ, fiˆ˜ Ë ÎÏÂȉÔÎÚ·Óȷ΋ ‰˘ÛfiÛÙˆÛË Î·È Ë Â͈- tooth is able to move labio-lingually while the affected
one fails to produce any kind of movement. Percussion
‰ÂÚÌÈ΋ ‰˘ÛÏ·Û›·, Û˘Ó‰¤ÔÓÙ·È Ì ·˘ÍË̤ÓË Â›ÙˆÛË
sound should be recorded after tapping the crown of
·ÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤ÓˆÓ ‰ÔÓÙÈÒÓ Î·È Î·Ù¿ Û˘Ó¤ÂÈ· ÂÌ‚‡ıÈÛË ÙˆÓ the tooth vertically as well as horizontally with the
·ÓÙ›ÛÙÔȯˆÓ ÓÂÔÁÈÏÒÓ (Pedersen Î·È Hallett, 1994). handle of a probe. Ankylosed teeth have a sharp,
∆¤ÏÔ˜, ·ÚÔ˘ÛÈ¿˙ÂÙ·È ·˘ÍË̤ÓÔ˜ ÂÈÔÏ·ÛÌfi˜ ÂÌ‚˘ıÈ- solid sound on percussion in contrast to the dull
ÛÌ¤ÓˆÓ ÓÂÔÁÈÏÒÓ ÁÔÌÊ›ˆÓ Û ÂÚÈÙÒÛÂȘ Û˘ÁÁÂÓÔ‡˜ cushioned sound of a normal tooth (Vorhies et al.,
¤ÏÏÂȄ˘ ÙˆÓ ÌÔÓ›ÌˆÓ ‰È·‰fi¯ˆÓ ÙÔ˘˜ (Brearley Î·È 1952; Albers, 1986). According to Andersson et al.
McKibben, 1972; Kula Î·È Û˘Ó., 1984; Brown, (1994), mobility and percussion tests are only reliable
1966). ÕÏÏË ÌÂϤÙË ¤‰ÂÈÍ fiÙÈ ÔÈ ÓÂÔÁÈÏÔ› ÁÔÌÊ›ÔÈ Ô˘ when at least 20% of the root is affected. If the area of
‚Ú›ÛÎÔÓÙ·È Û ·ÙÂÏ‹ Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈÛË ·ÚÔ˘ÛÈ¿˙Ô˘Ó Î·Ù¿ ankylosis is of sufficient size, radiographic examination
̤ÛÔ fiÚÔ ÌÈÎÚ‹ ηı˘ÛÙ¤ÚËÛË Ù˘ ·Ó·ÙÔÏ‹˜ ÙÔ˘ ÌÔÓ›- usually reveals obliteration of periodontal membrane
ÌÔ˘ ‰È·‰fi¯Ô˘, ÂÓÒ ÔÈ ÓÂÔÁÈÏÔ› ÁÔÌÊ›ÔÈ ¯ˆÚ›˜ ÌfiÓÈÌÔ space, indicative of fusion between root cementum
‰È¿‰Ô¯Ô ‰fiÓÙÈ ‰ÂÓ ·Ô›ÙÔ˘Ó ·˘ÙfiÌ·Ù· Î·È ·ÚÔ˘- and the alveolar bone (Andersson et al., 1984). This
method of diagnosis is frequently inadequate, since
ÛÈ¿˙Ô˘Ó ÚÔ˚Ô‡Û· ·ÙÂÏ‹ Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈÛË (Kurol ηÈ
ankylotic areas are only evident radiographically if
Thilander, 1984). located on the proximal surfaces of the root, but are
not evident when it occurs on the lingual, labial and
interradicular areas (Thornton and Zimmermann,
¢IA°Nø™H 1965). The limitations of conventional radiography
can be overcome by the use of computerized
∫·Ù¿ ÙËÓ ÎÏÈÓÈ΋ ÂͤٷÛË ÙÔ ˘·›ÙÈÔ ‰fiÓÙÈ ·ÚÔ˘ÛÈ¿˙ÂÈ tomography (CT). With this method, even subtle hard

E§§HNIKH OP£O¢ONTIKH E¶I£EøPH™H 2003 ñ TOMO™ 6 78 HELLENIC ORTHODONTIC REVIEW 2003 ñ VOLUME 6
A
PEI E§
AI

ET

§A
¢ONTIKH

¢O
¶. ¶ANO™ AÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤Ó· ‰fiÓÙÈ·: OÚıÔ‰ÔÓÙÈ΋ ÚÔÛ¤ÁÁÈÛË P. PANOS Tooth ankylosis: Orthodontic implications

™ 1963
£O
OP
Û˘Ó‹ıˆ˜ ¤ÏÏÂÈ„Ë ÎÈÓËÙÈÎfiÙËÙ·˜ Î·È Ë Ì·ÛËÙÈ΋ ÙÔ˘ ÂÈ- tissue lesions can be evaluated (Elefteriadis and
Ê¿ÓÂÈ· ‚Ú›ÛÎÂÙ·È Î¿Ùˆ ·fi ÙÔ ÏÂÈÙÔ˘ÚÁÈÎfi Â›Â‰Ô Athanasiou, 1996). Transverse CT images of 1.5 mm
Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈÛ˘. ∫¿ı ‰fiÓÙÈ Ô˘ ÊÙ¿ÓÂÈ ÛÙÔ Â›Â‰Ô may be helpful in revealing the pathoses.
Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈÛ˘ Î·È ÛÙË Û˘Ó¤¯ÂÈ· ‚Ú›ÛÎÂÙ·È ÂÎÙfi˜ Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈ- In most cases, the diagnosis is usually based on
Û˘ Ú¤ÂÈ Ó· ıˆÚÂ›Ù·È ·ÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤ÓÔ (Vorhies Î·È clinical findings, which may not be supported by
Û˘Ó., 1952; Albers, 1986, Messer Î·È Cline, conventional radiography findings (Albers, 1986).
1980; Pilo Î·È Û˘Ó., 1989). ∏ ‰ÔÎÈÌ·Û›· ÎÈÓËÙÈÎfiÙË- Although a high percussion sound and decreased
mobility might be sensitive and accurate signs of
Ù·˜ ÌÔÚ› Ó· Á›ÓÂÈ Ì ¿ÌÂÛË ‰·ÎÙ˘ÏÈ΋ ›ÂÛË ‹ Ì ÙË
ankylosis, failure of the tooth to move following the
¯Ú‹ÛË ÂÚÈÔ‰ÔÓÙfiÌÂÙÚÔ˘ (Andersson Î·È Û˘Ó.,
application of orthodontic forces is believed to be the
1994). ∆Ô ˘ÁȤ˜ ‰fiÓÙÈ ÌÔÚ› Ó· ÎÈÓËı› ·ÚÂÈÔ- definitive diagnostic test (Phelan, 1990; Albers,
ÁψÛÛÈο, ÂÓÒ ÙÔ ÚÔۂ‚ÏË̤ÓÔ ·‰˘Ó·Ù› Ó· οÓÂÈ 1986).
ÔÔÈ·‰‹ÔÙ ΛÓËÛË. √ ÂÈÎÚÔ˘ÛÙÈÎfi˜ ‹¯Ô˜ Ú¤ÂÈ Impacted teeth are more often ankylosed in adults. The
Ó· ηٷÁÚ¿ÊÂÙ·È ÌÂÙ¿ ·fi ηٷÎfiÚ˘ÊÔ Î·È ÔÚÈ˙fiÓÙÈÔ diagnosis of this situation poses difficulties since the
ÎÙ‡ËÌ· Ù˘ ̇Ï˘ ÙÔ˘ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡ Ì ÙË Ï·‚‹ ÌÈ·˜ tooth is not accessible to clinical examination. One
Ì‹Ï˘. ∆· ·ÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤Ó· ‰fiÓÙÈ· ·Ú¿ÁÔ˘Ó Ô͇, ÛÙ·ıÂ- way to assess the condition through radiographic
Úfi ‹¯Ô ÛÙËÓ Â›ÎÚÔ˘ÛË Û ·ÓÙ›ıÂÛË Ì ÙÔÓ ·Ì‚χ Î·È examination is to evaluate the periodontal ligament
˘fiΈÊÔ ‹¯Ô ÙÔ˘ Ê˘ÛÈÔÏÔÁÈÎÔ‡ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡ (Vorhies Î·È space as well as root morphology and determine if a
Û˘Ó., 1952; Albers, 1986). ™‡Ìʈӷ Ì ÙÔ˘˜ dilaceration is present. A CT of the impacted tooth is
Andersson Î·È Û˘Ó. (1994), ÔÈ ‰ÔÎÈ̷ۛ˜ ÎÈÓËÙÈÎfiÙË- of importance to determine the position of the tooth
Ù·˜ Î·È Â›ÎÚÔ˘Û˘ Â›Ó·È ·ÍÈfiÈÛÙ˜ fiÙ·Ó ¤¯ÂÈ ÚÔ- and the presence of an area of fusion between the
Û‚ÏËı› ÙÔ˘Ï¿¯ÈÛÙÔÓ ÙÔ 20% Ù˘ Ú›˙·˜. ∂ÊfiÛÔÓ Ë cementum and the alveolar bone (Elefteriadis and
ÂÚÈÔ¯‹ Ù˘ ·Á·ψÛ˘ ¤¯ÂÈ Â·ÚΤ˜ ̤ÁÂıÔ˜, Ë ·ÎÙÈ- Athanasiou, 1996).
ÓÔÁÚ·ÊÈ΋ ÂͤٷÛË ·ÔηχÙÂÈ Û˘Ó‹ıˆ˜ ÂÍ¿ÏÂÈ„Ë
ÙÔ˘ ¯ÒÚÔ˘ Ù˘ ÂÚÈÔ‰ÔÓÙÈ΋˜ ÌÂÌ‚Ú¿Ó˘, ÁÂÁÔÓfi˜
MANA°EMENT
ÂÓ‰ÂÈÎÙÈÎfi Ù˘ Û‡ÓÙË͢ ÌÂٷ͇ ÚÈ˙È΋˜ ÔÛÙ½Ó˘ ηÈ
Ê·ÙÓÈ·ÎÔ‡ ÔÛÙÔ‡ (Andersson Î·È Û˘Ó., 1994). ∞˘Ù‹ Ë
Different treatment options have been recommended
‰È·ÁÓˆÛÙÈ΋ ̤ıÔ‰Ô˜ Â›Ó·È Û˘¯Ó¿ ·ÓÂ·Ú΋˜, ·ÊÔ‡
for the management of tooth ankylosis. Treatment
ÔÈ ·ÁÎ˘ÏˆÙÈΤ˜ ÂÚÈÔ¯¤˜ Â›Ó·È ÂÌÊ·Ó›˜ ·ÎÙÈÓÔÁÚ·ÊÈ- depends upon whether it is a deciduous or permanent
ο ÌfiÓÔ ÂÊfiÛÔÓ ‚Ú›ÛÎÔÓÙ·È ÛÙȘ fiÌÔÚ˜ ÂÈÊ¿ÓÂȘ tooth, the extent of ankylosis, the time of diagnosis and
Ù˘ Ú›˙·˜. ¢ÂÓ ÈÛ¯‡ÂÈ fï˜ ÙÔ ›‰ÈÔ fiÙ·Ó Ë ·Á·ψÛË the location of the affected tooth (McNamara et al.,
·ÚÔ˘ÛÈ¿˙ÂÙ·È ÛÙȘ ÁψÛÛÈΤ˜, ·ÚÂȷΤ˜ Î·È ÌÂÛÔÚ- 2000).
ÚÈ˙ÈΤ˜ ÂÚÈÔ¯¤˜ (Thornton Î·È Zimmermann, 1965). In case of a deciduous tooth treatment is relatively
√È ÂÚÈÔÚÈÛÌÔ› Ù˘ Û˘Ì‚·ÙÈ΋˜ ·ÎÙÈÓÔÁÚ·Ê›·˜ ÌÔ- simple and varies from simple observation, to
Ú› Ó· ÍÂÂÚ·ÛÙÔ‡Ó Ì ÙË ¯Ú‹ÛË ·ÍÔÓÈ΋˜ ÙÔÌÔÁÚ·- restoration or extraction.
Ê›·˜ (computerized tomography, CT). ªÂ ÙË Ì¤ıÔ‰Ô If ankylosis occurs late and no significant amount of
·˘Ù‹ ÌÔÚÔ‡Ó Ó· ·ÍÈÔÏÔÁËıÔ‡Ó ·ÎfiÌË Î·È Ôχ alveolar growth is expected, the tooth may be left
ÌÈÎÚ¤˜ ·ÏÏÔÈÒÛÂȘ ÙˆÓ ÛÎÏËÚÒÓ ÈÛÙÒÓ (Elefteriadis Î·È undisturbed just waiting for the normal exfoliation
Athanasiou, 1996). ∂ÁοÚÛȘ ÙÔ̤˜ ·ÍÔÓÈ΋˜ ÙÔÌÔ- provided it is monitored carefully (Biederman, 1962;
ÁÚ·Ê›·˜ 1.5 mm ÌÔÚ› Ó· ‚ÔËı‹ÛÔ˘Ó ÛÙËÓ ·Ôο- Konstat and White, 1975; Kurol and Koch, 1985). If
Ï˘„Ë Ù˘ ·ıÔÏÔÁÈ΋˜ ÂÚÈÔ¯‹˜. it fails to exfoliate on schedule or the tooth becomes
progressively infraoccluded and tipping of adjacent
™ÙȘ ÂÚÈÛÛfiÙÂÚ˜ ÂÚÈÙÒÛÂȘ Ë ‰È¿ÁÓˆÛË ‚·Û›˙ÂÙ·È
teeth is imminent, a composite build up should be
Û˘Ó‹ıˆ˜ ÛÙ· ÎÏÈÓÈο Â˘Ú‹Ì·Ù·, Ù· ÔÔ›· ÌÔÚ› Ó·
placed in order to restore the occlusion and
ÌËÓ ˘ÔÛÙËÚ›˙ÔÓÙ·È ·fi Ù· Û˘Ì‚·ÙÈο ·ÎÙÈÓÔÁÚ·ÊÈο interproximal contacts (Albers, 1986; Messer and
Â˘Ú‹Ì·Ù·. ¶·ÚfiÏÔ Ô˘ Ô Ô͇˜ ÂÈÎÚÔ˘ÛÙÈÎfi˜ ‹¯Ô˜ Î·È Cline, 1980).
Ë ÌÂȈ̤ÓË ÎÈÓËÙÈÎfiÙËÙ· ÌÔÚ› Ó· ·ÔÙÂÏÔ‡Ó Â˘·›ÛıË- Extraction of the ankylosed deciduous tooth is
Ù· Î·È ·ÎÚÈ‚‹ ÛËÌ›· ·Á·ψÛ˘, Ë ÈÔ ·ÍÈfiÈÛÙË ‰È·- indicated in cases of advanced decay, severe
ÁÓˆÛÙÈ΋ ‰ÔÎÈÌ·Û›· ÈÛÙ‡ÂÙ·È fiÙÈ Â›Ó·È Ë ·ÓÈηÓfiÙËÙ· infraocclusion, and abnormal root resorption due to
ÙÔ˘ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡ Ó· ÌÂÙ·ÎÈÓËı› ÌÂÙ¿ ·fi ÂÊ·ÚÌÔÁ‹ ÔÚıÔ- mesial or distal location of the permanent successor
‰ÔÓÙÈÎÒÓ ‰˘Ó¿ÌÂˆÓ (Phelan, 1990; Albers, 1986). and severe tipping of the adjacent teeth (Achi-Beaini

E§§HNIKH OP£O¢ONTIKH E¶I£EøPH™H 2003 ñ TOMO™ 6 79 HELLENIC ORTHODONTIC REVIEW 2003 ñ VOLUME 6
A
PEI E§
AI

ET

§A
¢ONTIKH

¢O
¶. ¶ANO™ AÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤Ó· ‰fiÓÙÈ·: OÚıÔ‰ÔÓÙÈ΋ ÚÔÛ¤ÁÁÈÛË P. PANOS Tooth ankylosis: Orthodontic implications

™ 1963
£O
OP
∆· ¤ÁÎÏÂÈÛÙ· ‰fiÓÙÈ· ·Á΢ÏÒÓÔÓÙ·È Û˘¯ÓfiÙÂÚ· ÛÙÔ˘˜ and Skaf, 2001). Extraction should be routinely
ÂÓ‹ÏÈΘ. ∏ ‰È¿ÁÓˆÛË ·˘Ù‹˜ Ù˘ ηٿÛÙ·Û˘ Â›Ó·È followed by placement of a space maintainer. The
‰‡ÛÎÔÏË, ·ÊÔ‡ ÙÔ ‰fiÓÙÈ ‰ÂÓ Â›Ó·È ÚÔÛÂÏ¿ÛÈÌÔ ÁÈ· younger the patient the greater need there is for the
ÎÏÈÓÈ΋ ÂͤٷÛË. ŒÓ·˜ ÙÚfiÔ˜ ÂÎÙ›ÌËÛ˘ Â›Ó·È Ì ·ÎÙÈ- insertion of a space maintainer after the removal of the
ÓÔÁÚ·ÊÈ΋ ÂͤٷÛË ÁÈ· Ó· ·ÍÈÔÏÔÁËı› Ô ¯ÒÚÔ˜ ÙÔ˘ tooth (Krakowiak, 1978).
ÂÚÈÔ‰ÔÓÙÈÎÔ‡ Û˘Ó‰¤ÛÌÔ˘ Î·È Ë ÌÔÚÊÔÏÔÁ›· Ù˘ Treatment of a permanent tooth with ankylosis is more
Ú›˙·˜ Î·È Ó· ηıÔÚÈÛÙ› ·Ó ÙÔ ¤ÁÎÏÂÈÛÙÔ ‰fiÓÙÈ ¤¯ÂÈ complicated. A decision must be made whether the
tooth is needed and an effort should be made to bring
‰˘ÛÎÂηÌ̤ÓË Ú›˙·. ∏ ·ÍÔÓÈ΋ ÙÔÌÔÁÚ·Ê›· ÙÔ˘
it in occlusion or it may be extracted with subsequent
¤ÁÎÏÂÈÛÙÔ˘ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡ Â›Ó·È ÛËÌ·ÓÙÈ΋ ÁÈ· ÙÔÓ Î·ıÔÚÈÛÌfi
orthodontic closure of the space or prosthetic
Ù˘ ı¤Û˘ ÙÔ˘ Î·È Ù˘ ·ÚÔ˘Û›·˜ ÂÚÈÔ¯‹˜ Û‡ÓÙË͢ replacement. Removing such a tooth is usually difficult
ÌÂٷ͇ ÔÛÙ½Ó˘ Î·È Ê·ÙÓÈ·ÎÔ‡ ÔÛÙÔ‡ (Elefteriadis Î·È and requires surgical extraction. Different procedures,
Athanasiou, 1996). which help bring the affected tooth in the proper
occlusion, are luxation, corticotomy or ostectomy.
Luxation involves the mechanical breakage of the
£EPA¶EYTIKH ANTIMETø¶I™H ankylosis without significantly compromising the
nutrient vessels at the apex. This can be accomplished
°È· ÙËÓ ·ÓÙÈÌÂÙÒÈÛË ÙˆÓ ·ÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤ÓˆÓ ‰ÔÓÙÈÒÓ ÚÔÙ›- by firmly grasping the tooth with the appropriate
ÓÔÓÙ·È ‰È¿ÊÔÚ˜ ıÂÚ·¢ÙÈΤ˜ ÂÈÏÔÁ¤˜. ∏ ıÂÚ·›· forceps and gently rocking it in a buccolingual and
ÂÍ·ÚÙ¿Ù·È ·fi ÙÔ Â›‰Ô˜ ÙÔ˘ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡, ÓÂÔÁÈÏfi ‹ ÌfiÓÈ- mesiodistal direction. After the reparative process, the
ÌÔ, ·fi ÙÔ ‚·ıÌfi Ù˘ ·Á·ψÛ˘, ÙÔÓ ¯ÚfiÓÔ Ù˘ ‰È¿- continuity of the periodontal ligament is restored
ÁÓˆÛ˘ Î·È ÙËÓ ÂÓÙfiÈÛË ÙÔ˘ ˘·›ÙÈÔ˘ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡ allowing for tooth eruption to resume on its own
(McNamara Î·È Û˘Ó., 2000). (Skolnick, 1962). Geiger and Bronsky (1994)
advocated using forced eruption (i.e. apply
™ÙËÓ ÂÚ›ÙˆÛË ÓÂÔÁÈÏÔ‡ ·ÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤ÓÔ˘ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡ Ë
orthodontic force after the luxation). This approach
ıÂÚ·›· Â›Ó·È Û¯ÂÙÈο ·Ï‹ Î·È ÔÈΛÏÏÂÈ ·fi ·Ï‹
provided a functional tooth in the presence of alveolar
·Ú·Ù‹ÚËÛË Ì¤¯ÚÈ ·ÔηٿÛÙ·ÛË ‹ ÂÍ·ÁˆÁ‹ ÙÔ˘. bone.
∞Ó Ë ·Á·ψÛË ÂÈÛ˘Ì‚Â› ·ÚÁfiÙÂÚ· Î·È ‰ÂÓ ·Ó·Ì¤ÓÂ- Corticotomy is a surgical technique in which a small
Ù·È ÛËÌ·ÓÙÈ΋ ÂÚ·ÈÙ¤Úˆ ·Ó¿Ù˘ÍË ÙÔ˘ Ê·ÙÓÈ·ÎÔ‡ segment osteotomy is used to reposition both the
ÔÛÙÔ‡, ÙÔ ‰fiÓÙÈ ÌÔÚ› Ó· ·Ú·Ì›ÓÂÈ ˆ˜ ¤¯ÂÈ ÂÓ ·Ó·- ankylosed tooth and the adjacent alveolar bone.
ÌÔÓ‹ Ù˘ Ê˘ÛÈÔÏÔÁÈ΋˜ ·fiÙˆÛ‹˜ ÙÔ˘ Ì ÙËÓ ÚÔ¸- Localized ostectomy of the fused bone is a procedure
fiıÂÛË fiÙÈ ÂϤÁ¯ÂÙ·È ÚÔÛÂÎÙÈο (Biederman, 1962; where the affected osseous tissue is excised. This
Konstat Î·È White, 1975; Kurol Î·È Koch, 1985). approach works only if the ankylosis is in the crestal
∞Ó ÙÔ ‰fiÓÙÈ ‰ÂÓ ·Ô¤ÛÂÈ ¤ÁηÈÚ· ‹ ·ÚÔ˘ÛÈ¿˙ÂÈ area because elsewhere it is not readily accessible to
ÚÔ˚Ô‡Û· ·ÙÂÏ‹ Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈÛË Ì ·ÔÙ¤ÏÂÛÌ· Ó· ˘¿Ú¯ÂÈ surgery (Phelan, 1990).
ΛӉ˘ÓÔ˜ ·fiÎÏÈÛ˘ ÙˆÓ ·Ú·Î›ÌÂÓˆÓ ‰ÔÓÙÈÒÓ, Ú¤-
ÂÈ Ó· ÚÔÛÙÂı› Û‡ÓıÂÙË ÚËÙ›ÓË ÁÈ· Ó· ·ÔηٷÛÙ·-
ı› Ë Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈÛË Î·È ÔÈ fiÌÔÚ˜ Â·Ê¤˜ ÙÔ˘ (Albers, ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT
1986; Messer Î·È Cline, 1980). AND ANKYLOSED TEETH
∂Í·ÁˆÁ‹ ÙÔ˘ ÓÂÔÁÈÏÔ‡ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡ ÂӉ›ÎÓ˘Ù·È Û ÂÚÈ-
ÙÒÛÂȘ ÚÔ¯ˆÚË̤ÓÔ˘ ÙÂÚˉÔÓÈÛÌÔ‡ ÙÔ˘, ÌÂÁ¿ÏÔ˘ Impaction
‚·ıÌÔ‡ ·ÙÂÏÔ‡˜ Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈÛ˘, ·ÓÒÌ·Ï˘ ·ÔÚÚfiÊË- Frequently during the course of an orthodontic
treatment the clinician is called to bring out an
Û˘ Ù˘ Ú›˙·˜ ÙÔ˘ ÏfiÁˆ ÂÁÁ‡˜ ‹ ¿ˆ ÂÓÙfiÈÛ˘ ÙÔ˘
impacted tooth into the dental arch. Impaction is a term
ÌfiÓÈÌÔ˘ ‰È¿‰Ô¯Ô˘ Î·È ÂÎÛÂÛËÌ·Ṳ̂Ó˘ ·fiÎÏÈÛ˘
used to describe any tooth that has failed to erupt into
ÙˆÓ ·Ú·ÎÂÈÌ¤ÓˆÓ ‰ÔÓÙÈÒÓ (Achi-Beaini Î·È Skaf, normal position beyond its eruption time (Lytle, 1979).
2001). ∏ ÂÍ·ÁˆÁ‹ Ú¤ÂÈ, ηٿ ηÓfiÓ·, Ó· ·ÎÔÏÔ˘- Kracke et al. (1975) suggested that permanent teeth
ıÂ›Ù·È ·fi ÙÔÔı¤ÙËÛË Û˘Û΢‹˜ ‰È·Ù‹ÚËÛ˘ ¯ÒÚÔ˘. should not be considered delayed unless two years
ŸÛÔ ÌÈÎÚfiÙÂÚÔ˜ Û ËÏÈΛ· Â›Ó·È Ô ·ÛıÂÓ‹˜, ÙfiÛÔ have elapsed from their normal eruption time.
ÌÂÁ·Ï‡ÙÂÚË Â›Ó·È Ë ·Ó¿ÁÎË ÙÔÔı¤ÙËÛ˘ ·ÚfiÌÔÈ·˜ Impaction in the primary dentition is rare compared to
Û˘Û΢‹˜ ÌÂÙ¿ ÙËÓ ÂÍ·ÁˆÁ‹ (Krakowiak, 1978). impaction in the permanent dentition (Atwan and Des
∏ ·ÓÙÈÌÂÙÒÈÛË ·ÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤ÓÔ˘ ÌfiÓÈÌÔ˘ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡ Â›Ó·È Rosiers, 1998).

E§§HNIKH OP£O¢ONTIKH E¶I£EøPH™H 2003 ñ TOMO™ 6 80 HELLENIC ORTHODONTIC REVIEW 2003 ñ VOLUME 6
A
PEI E§
AI

ET

§A
¢ONTIKH

¢O
¶. ¶ANO™ AÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤Ó· ‰fiÓÙÈ·: OÚıÔ‰ÔÓÙÈ΋ ÚÔÛ¤ÁÁÈÛË P. PANOS Tooth ankylosis: Orthodontic implications

™ 1963
£O
OP
ÈÔ ÔχÏÔÎË. ¶Ú¤ÂÈ Ó· ·ÔÊ·ÛÈÛÙ› ·Ó ÙÔ ‰fiÓÙÈ When the tooth has not erupted, the clinician is not
¯ÚÂÈ¿˙ÂÙ·È Ó· ·Ú·Ì›ÓÂÈ Î·È Ó· Á›ÓÂÈ ÚÔÛ¿ıÂÈ· able to know if ankylosis is the etiology of the
ÙÔÔı¤ÙËÛ‹˜ ÙÔ˘ Û ı¤ÛË Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈÛ˘ ‹ ·Ó ÌÔÚ› Ó· impaction. Often orthodontists order extractions, with
ÂÍ·¯ı› Î·È Ó· Â·ÎÔÏÔ˘ı‹ÛÂÈ ÎÏ›ÛÈÌÔ ÙÔ˘ ¯ÒÚÔ˘ Ì the expectation of bringing the unerupted teeth into the
ÔÚıÔ‰ÔÓÙÈ΋ ıÂÚ·›· ‹ Ó· Á›ÓÂÈ ÚÔÛıÂÙÈ΋ ·Ôη- arch. They might later find that those teeth are
Ù¿ÛÙ·ÛË. ∏ ·Ê·›ÚÂÛË Ù¤ÙÔÈˆÓ ‰ÔÓÙÈÒÓ Â›Ó·È Û˘Ó‹ıˆ˜ immobile and order their extraction (Graber, 1966).
Even if a small area of fusion occurs between
‰‡ÛÎÔÏË Î·È ··ÈÙ› ¯ÂÈÚÔ˘ÚÁÈ΋ ÂÍ·ÁˆÁ‹. ÕÏϘ ‰È·-
cementum and alveolar bone, orthodontic movement
‰Èηۛ˜ Ô˘ ‚ÔËıÔ‡Ó ÙÔ ‰fiÓÙÈ Ó· ¤ÚıÂÈ Û ۈÛÙ‹ of the unerupted tooth becomes impossible and
Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈÛË Â›Ó·È Ë ÂÍ¿ÚıÚˆÛË ÙÔ˘ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡, Ë ÊÏÔÈÔ- displacement of the anchor teeth will occur (Proffit and
ÙÔÌ‹ ‹ Ë ÔÛÙÂÎÙÔÌ‹. Fields, 2000).
∏ ÂÍ¿ÚıÚˆÛË ·ÊÔÚ¿ ÛÙË Ì˯·ÓÈ΋ Ú‹ÍË Ù˘ ·Á·ψ- Furthermore, it has been reported that an impacted
Û˘ ¯ˆÚ›˜ Ó· Ï‹ÙÙÔÓÙ·È Ô˘ÛÈ·ÛÙÈο Ù· ÙÚÔÊÔÊfiÚ· tooth may initially start moving but it will subsequently
·ÁÁ›· ÛÙÔ ·ÎÚÔÚÚ›˙ÈÔ ÙÔ˘ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡. ∞˘Ùfi ÌÔÚ› Ó· stop responding to orthodontic forces. A possible
ÂÈÙ¢¯ı› È¿ÓÔÓÙ·˜ ÛÙ·ıÂÚ¿ ÙÔ ‰fiÓÙÈ Ì ÙËÓ Î·Ù¿Ï- cause may be trauma on the periodontal ligament
ÏËÏË Ô‰ÔÓÙ¿ÁÚ· Î·È ÎÈÓÒÓÙ·˜ ÙÔ ‹È· Û ·ÚÂÈÔ- during surgical exposure or too much force applied to
ÁψÛÛÈ΋ Î·È ÂÁÁ‡˜-¿ˆ ‰È‡ı˘ÓÛË. ªÂÙ¿ ÙËÓ Â·- move the tooth. Also a high incidence of tooth
ÓÔÚıˆÙÈ΋ ‰ÈÂÚÁ·Û›· ·Ôηı›ÛÙ·Ù·È Ë Û˘Ó¤¯ÂÈ· ÙÔ˘ ankylosis has been associated with the presence of a
ÂÚÈÔ‰ÔÓÙÈÎÔ‡ Û˘Ó‰¤ÛÌÔ˘ Î·È ‰›ÓÂÙ·È ¤ÙÛÈ Ë ‰˘Ó·ÙfiÙË- stainless steel ligature at the cemento-enamel junction
(Graber, 1966). It is believed that this is the least
Ù· Ó· Û˘Ó¯ÈÛÙ› ·ÚfiÛÎÔÙ· Ë ·Ó·ÙÔÏ‹ ÙÔ˘ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡
desirable way to place an attachment for the
(Skolnick, 1962). √È Geiger Î·È Bronsky (1994) application of orthodontic forces (Proffit and Fields,
˘ÔÛÙ‹ÚÈÍ·Ó ÙË ¯Ú‹ÛË Ù˘ ˘Ô‚ÔËıÔ‡ÌÂÓ˘ ·Ó·ÙÔÏ‹˜ 2000). This form of attachment may act as an irritant
(‰ËÏ·‰‹, ÙËÓ ÂÊ·ÚÌÔÁ‹ ÔÚıÔ‰ÔÓÙÈ΋˜ ‰‡Ó·Ì˘ ÌÂÙ¿ to the periodontal ligament and results in injury or
ÙËÓ ÂÍ¿ÚıÚˆÛË). ∏ ÚÔÛ¤ÁÁÈÛË ·˘Ù‹ ¤¯ÂÈ ˆ˜ ·ÔÙ¤- ankylosis. In such instances ankylosis occurs at the
ÏÂÛÌ· ¤Ó· ÏÂÈÙÔ˘ÚÁÈÎfi ‰fiÓÙÈ Ì·˙› Ì ʷÙÓÈ·Îfi ÔÛÙÔ‡Ó. crestal area where the wire is positioned.
∏ ÊÏÔÈÔÙÔÌ‹ Â›Ó·È ¯ÂÈÚÔ˘ÚÁÈ΋ Ù¯ÓÈ΋ ηٿ ÙËÓ
ÔÔ›·, ÌÂ ÙË ‚Ô‹ıÂÈ· ÔÛÙÂÔÙÔÌ›·˜ ÌÈÎÚÔ‡ ÙÌ‹Ì·ÙÔ˜, Orthodontic traction
Â·Ó·ÙÔÔıÂÙÂ›Ù·È ÙfiÛÔ ÙÔ ·ÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤ÓÔ ‰fiÓÙÈ fiÛÔ Î·È Differential diagnosis for an impacted tooth is not
ÙÔ ·Ú·Î›ÌÂÓÔ Ê·ÙÓÈ·Îfi ÔÛÙÔ‡Ó. possible without clinical assessment. Diagnosis can be
∏ ÙÔÈ΋ ÔÛÙÂÎÙÔÌ‹ ÙÔ˘ ·ÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤ÓÔ˘ ÔÛÙÔ‡ Â›Ó·È ‰È·- made only after the clinician surgically exposes the
‰Èηۛ· ηٿ ÙËÓ ÔÔ›· ·Ê·ÈÚÂ›Ù·È Ô ÚÔÛ‚ÏËı›˜ tooth and attempts orthodontic movement (Frank,
2000). During the time the tooth is exposed the
ÔÛÙ›Ù˘ ÈÛÙfi˜. ∞˘Ù‹ Ë ıÂÚ·¢ÙÈ΋ ÚÔÛ¤ÁÁÈÛË ÌÔÚ›
surgeon can tentatively assess the condition of the tooth
Ó· ÂÊ·ÚÌÔÛÙ› ÌfiÓÔ ÂÊfiÛÔÓ Ë ·Á·ψÛË ‚Ú›ÛÎÂÙ·È by percussion and digital force. A sharp, solid
ÛÙËÓ ÂÚÈÔ¯‹ Ù˘ Ê·ÙÓȷ΋˜ ·ÎÚÔÏÔÊ›·˜, ‰ÈfiÙÈ ‰È·- percussion sound may be indicative of ankylosis but
ÊÔÚÂÙÈο Ë ¯ÂÈÚÔ˘ÚÁÈ΋ ÚÔÛ¤Ï·ÛË ‰ÂÓ Â›Ó·È Â‡ÎÔ- the absence of movement with orthodontic traction is a
ÏË (Phelan, 1990). definitive sign of ankylosis (McNamara et al., 2000;
Frank, 2000).

OP£O¢ONTIKH £EPA¶EIA Inability of the tooth to erupt


KAI A°KY§øMENA ¢ONTIA By definition the development of a fusion between
cementum and alveolar bone may occur at any point
ŒÁÎÏÂÈÛË during the eruption of a tooth. It might be observed on
™˘¯Ó¿ ηٿ ÙË ‰È¿ÚÎÂÈ· Ù˘ ÔÚıÔ‰ÔÓÙÈ΋˜ ıÂÚ·›·˜ erupted teeth that look normal in the dental arch when
ankylosis occurs after the affected tooth reaches the
Ô ÔÚıÔ‰ÔÓÙÈÎfi˜ ηÏÂ›Ù·È Ó· ÌÂÙ·ÎÈÓ‹ÛÂÈ ¤Ó· ¤ÁÎÏÂÈÛÙÔ
occlusal plane and there is no growth left. A tooth
‰fiÓÙÈ Î·È Ó· ÙÔ ‰È¢ıÂÙ‹ÛÂÈ ÛÙÔ Ô‰ÔÓÙÈÎfi ÙfiÍÔ. ŒÁÎÏÂÈ- might ankylose during active eruption before it reaches
ÛË Â›Ó·È Ô fiÚÔ˜ Ô˘ ¯ÚËÛÈÌÔÔÈÂ›Ù·È ÁÈ· Ó· ÂÚÈ- the occlusal plane, or ankylosis may occur on
ÁÚ¿„ÂÈ ÙÔ ‰fiÓÙÈ ÂΛÓÔ Ô˘ ‰ÂÓ ÌfiÚÂÛ ӷ ·Ó·Ù›ÏÂÈ unerupted teeth, thus being the cause of their
Û ۈÛÙ‹ ı¤ÛË ÂÓÙfi˜ ÙÔ˘ Ê˘ÛÈÔÏÔÁÈÎÔ‡ ¯ÚfiÓÔ˘ ·Ó·- impaction.
ÙÔÏ‹˜ ÙÔ˘ (Lytle, 1979). √È Kracke Î·È Û˘Ó. (1975) Eruption is a continuous process and does not stop
·Ó·Ê¤ÚÔ˘Ó fiÙÈ Ë ·Ó·ÙÔÏ‹ ÌfiÓÈÌˆÓ ‰ÔÓÙÈÒÓ ‰ÂÓ Ú¤ÂÈ once the tooth comes into contact with the antagonist.

E§§HNIKH OP£O¢ONTIKH E¶I£EøPH™H 2003 ñ TOMO™ 6 81 HELLENIC ORTHODONTIC REVIEW 2003 ñ VOLUME 6
A
PEI E§
AI

ET

§A
¢ONTIKH

¢O
¶. ¶ANO™ AÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤Ó· ‰fiÓÙÈ·: OÚıÔ‰ÔÓÙÈ΋ ÚÔÛ¤ÁÁÈÛË P. PANOS Tooth ankylosis: Orthodontic implications

™ 1963
£O
OP
Ó· ıˆÚÂ›Ù·È Î·ı˘ÛÙÂÚË̤ÓË ·Ú¿ ÌfiÓÔ ·ÊÔ‡ ·Ú¤Ï- In young age it compensates for jaw growth, while in
ıÔ˘Ó ÙÔ˘Ï¿¯ÈÛÙÔÓ ‰‡Ô ¯ÚfiÓÈ· ·fi ÙÔÓ Î·ıÔÚÈṲ̂ÓÔ older age it compensates for abrasion (Biederman,
¯ÚfiÓÔ ·Ó·ÙÔÏ‹˜ ÙÔ˘˜. ŒÁÎÏÂÈÛÙ· ÓÂÔÁÈÏ¿ ‰fiÓÙÈ· 1962). A permanent first molar erupts approximately
Â›Ó·È Û¿ÓÈ· ηٿÛÙ·ÛË Û ۇÁÎÚÈÛË Ì ٷ ÌfiÓÈÌ· 1cm after it initially reaches the occlusal level and is in
‰fiÓÙÈ· (Atwan Î·È Des Rosiers, 1998). function in order to compensate for growth (Proffit and
ŸÙ·Ó ÙÔ ‰fiÓÙÈ ‰ÂÓ ¤¯ÂÈ ·Ó·Ù›ÏÂÈ, Ô ÎÏÈÓÈÎfi˜ ‰ÂÓ Â›Ó·È Fields, 2000). Once a functioning tooth, deciduous or
permanent becomes ankylosed it remains fixed in
Û ı¤ÛË Ó· ÁÓˆÚ›˙ÂÈ ·Ó ÙÔ ·›ÙÈÔ Ù˘ ¤ÁÎÏÂÈÛ˘ ›ӷÈ
position and becomes unable to move in any other
Ë ·Á·ψÛË. ™˘¯Ó¿ ÔÈ ÔÚıÔ‰ÔÓÙÈÎÔ› ‰›ÓÔ˘Ó ÂÓÙÔÏ‹ direction. Neighboring teeth continue erupting and
ÂÍ·ÁˆÁÒÓ ÚÔÛ‰ÔÎÒÓÙ·˜, ¤ÙÛÈ, ÙËÓ ·Ó·ÙÔÏ‹ ·˘ÙÒÓ alveolar bone continues growing while the affected
ÙˆÓ ‰ÔÓÙÈÒÓ ÛÙÔ Ô‰ÔÓÙÈÎfi ÙfiÍÔ. ªÔÚ› Ó· ·Ó·Î·Ï‡- tooth maintains the same occlusal level it reached at
„Ô˘Ó ·ÚÁfiÙÂÚ· fiÙÈ Ù· ‰fiÓÙÈ· ·˘Ù¿ ‰ÂÓ ÌÔÚÔ‡Ó Ó· the onset of ankylosis. This gives the false impression of
ÌÂÙ·ÎÈÓËıÔ‡Ó Î·È ÙfiÙ ˙ËÙÔ‡Ó ÙËÓ ÂÍ·ÁˆÁ‹ ÙÔ˘˜ submersion of the ankylosed tooth. Cephalometric
(Graber, 1966). ∞ÎfiÌË Î·È ·Ó ˘¿Ú¯ÂÈ ÌÈÎÚ‹ ÂÚÈÔ- studies have shown that submersion is the result of
¯‹ Û‡ÓÙË͢ ÔÛÙ½Ó˘ Î·È Ê·ÙÓÈ·ÎÔ‡ ÔÛÙÔ‡, Ë ÔÚıÔ- enclosure by surrounding tissues and not by active
‰ÔÓÙÈ΋ ÌÂٷΛÓËÛË ÙÔ˘ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡ Ô˘ ‰ÂÓ ¤¯ÂÈ ·Ó·Ù›- tooth movement (Konstat and White, 1975). The
ÏÂÈ Â›Ó·È ·‰‡Ó·ÙË, ÂÓÒ ·ÓÙ›ıÂÙ· ÂÈÛ˘Ì‚·›ÓÂÈ ÌÂÙ·Ùfi- severity of submersion is proportional to the rate of
ÈÛË Ù˘ ÛÙËÚÈÎÙÈ΋˜ ÌÔÓ¿‰·˜ (Proffit Î·È Fields, facial growth (Lamb and Reed, 1968).
2000).
Secondary impaction / Incomplete eruption
∂ÈϤÔÓ, ¤¯ÂÈ ·Ó·ÊÂÚı› fiÙÈ ¤Ó· ¤ÁÎÏÂÈÛÙÔ ‰fiÓÙÈ ÌÔ-
If a tooth (primary or permanent) is ankylosed before it
Ú› Ó· ·Ú¯›ÛÂÈ Ó· ÌÂÙ·ÎÈÓ›ٷÈ, ·ÏÏ¿ ÛÙË Û˘Ó¤¯ÂÈ· reaches the occlusal plane, it is considered as
·‡ÂÈ Ó· ·ÓÙ·ÔÎÚ›ÓÂÙ·È ÛÙËÓ ¿ÛÎËÛË ÔÚıÔ‰ÔÓÙÈÎÒÓ incompletely erupted.
‰˘Ó¿ÌˆÓ. ¶Èı·Ó‹ ·ÈÙ›· ÌÔÚ› Ó· Â›Ó·È ÙÚ·‡Ì· ÛÙÔÓ Secondary impaction is actually an extreme case
ÂÚÈÔ‰ÔÓÙÈÎfi Û‡Ó‰ÂÛÌÔ Î·Ù¿ ÙËÓ ¯ÂÈÚÔ˘ÚÁÈ΋ ·Ôο- following incomplete eruption. As the ankylosis of a
Ï˘„Ë ÙÔ˘ ¤ÁÎÏÂÈÛÙÔ˘ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡ ‹ ¿ÛÎËÛË ˘ÂÚ‚ÔÏÈ΋˜ deciduous molar develops, the distance of its occlusal
‰‡Ó·Ì˘ ÁÈ· ÙË ÌÂٷΛÓËÛ‹ ÙÔ˘. ∞ÎfiÌË, ·˘ÍË̤ÓË Â›- surface to the occlusal plane of the rest of the dentition
ÙˆÛË ·ÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤ÓˆÓ ‰ÔÓÙÈÒÓ Û˘Û¯ÂÙ›˙ÂÙ·È Ì ÙËÓ ¯Ú‹ÛË progressively increases. At some point, the
ÚfiÛ‰ÂÛ˘ ·ÓÔÍ›‰ˆÙÔ˘ ¯¿Ï˘‚· (Graber, 1966). neighboring teeth lose their contact points and start
¶ÈÛÙ‡ÂÙ·È fiÙÈ ·˘Ùfi˜ Â›Ó·È Ô ϤÔÓ ·Î·Ù¿ÏÏËÏÔ˜ ÙÚfi- tipping in the space created above the crown of the
Ô˜ ÙÔÔı¤ÙËÛ˘ Û˘Ó‰¤ÛÌÔ˘ ÁÈ· ¿ÛÎËÛË ÔÚıÔ‰ÔÓÙÈ- submerging primary molar. Alveolar bone stays with
ÎÒÓ ‰˘Ó¿ÌÂˆÓ ÛÙÔ ‰fiÓÙÈ (Proffit Î·È Fields, 2000). ∏ the submerged tooth resulting in progressive
infraocclusion until the point of complete impaction,
ÚfiÛ‰ÂÛË ÂÚÂı›˙ÂÈ ÙÔÓ ÂÚÈÔ‰ÔÓÙÈÎfi Û‡Ó‰ÂÛÌÔ Î·È
while the adjacent teeth may come into contact at the
¤¯ÂÈ ˆ˜ ·ÔÙ¤ÏÂÛÌ· ÙÚ·‡Ì· ‹ ·Á·ψÛË. ™ÙȘ ÂÚÈ- site that used to be occupied by the primary molar
ÙÒÛÂȘ ·˘Ù¤˜, Ë ·Á·ψÛË ÂÈÛ˘Ì‚·›ÓÂÈ ÛÙËÓ ÂÚÈÔ¯‹ (Spyropoulos, 2000). The term used to describe this
Ù˘ ·ÎÚÔÏÔÊ›·˜ fiÔ˘ ÙÔÔıÂÙÂ›Ù·È ÙÔ Û‡ÚÌ·. condition is secondary impaction. It may affect both
dental arches with tipping of the adjacent teeth and
√ÚıÔ‰ÔÓÙÈ΋ ¤ÏÍË supra-eruption of the opposing teeth. Secondary
∏ ‰È·ÊÔÚÈ΋ ‰È¿ÁÓˆÛË ¤ÁÎÏÂÈÛÙÔ˘ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡ ‰ÂÓ Â›Ó·È impaction occurs most frequently in the maxilla and the
‰˘Ó·Ù‹ ¯ˆÚ›˜ ÎÏÈÓÈ΋ ·ÍÈÔÏfiÁËÛË. ∏ ‰È¿ÁÓˆÛË ÌÔ- most commonly affected tooth is the second primary
Ú› Ó· Á›ÓÂÈ ÌfiÓÔ ·ÊÔ‡ Ô ÎÏÈÓÈÎfi˜ ·Ôηχ„ÂÈ ¯ÂÈ- molar.
ÚÔ˘ÚÁÈο ÙÔ ‰fiÓÙÈ Î·È ÂȯÂÈÚ‹ÛÂÈ ÙËÓ ÔÚıÔ‰ÔÓÙÈ΋ Diagnosis will be established by clinical and
ÙÔ˘ ÌÂٷΛÓËÛË (Frank, 2000). ∫·Ù¿ ÙË ‰È¿ÚÎÂÈ· Ù˘ radiographic examination. Clinical signs indicating
·ÔÎ¿Ï˘„˘ Ô ¯ÂÈÚÔ˘ÚÁfi˜ ÌÔÚ› ˆ˜ ¤Ó· ÛËÌÂ›Ô Ó· secondary impaction are the presence of the primary
tooth and its successor from the dental arch, tipping of
ÂÎÙÈÌ‹ÛÂÈ ÙËÓ Î·Ù¿ÛÙ·ÛË ÙÔ˘ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡ Ì Â›ÎÚÔ˘ÛË Î·È
the adjacent teeth and the presence of an epithelial
‰·ÎÙ˘ÏÈ΋ ›ÂÛË. √͇˜, Û˘Ì·Á‹˜ ÂÈÎÚÔ˘ÛÙÈÎfi˜ tube at the top of the alveolar process, proving that
‹¯Ô˜ ÌÔÚ› Ó· ·ÔÙÂÏ› ¤Ó‰ÂÈÍË ·Á·ψÛ˘, Ë ankylosis took place after emergence (Biederman,
·Ô˘Û›·, fï˜, ÌÂٷΛÓËÛ˘ Ì ÔÚıÔ‰ÔÓÙÈ΋ ¤ÏÍË 1962). Radiographic examination is necessary for the
Â›Ó·È ·‰È·ÌÊÈÛ‚‹ÙËÙÔ ÛËÌÂ›Ô ·Á·ψÛ˘ (McNamara diagnosis. It may reveal the ankylosis of the primary
Î·È Û˘Ó., 2000; Frank, 2000). molar, the presence of the succedaneous tooth unless it
∞‰˘Ó·Ì›· ·Ó·ÙÔÏ‹˜ ÙÔ˘ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡ is congenitally missing. There are reports of secondary

E§§HNIKH OP£O¢ONTIKH E¶I£EøPH™H 2003 ñ TOMO™ 6 82 HELLENIC ORTHODONTIC REVIEW 2003 ñ VOLUME 6
A
PEI E§
AI

ET

§A
¢ONTIKH

¢O
¶. ¶ANO™ AÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤Ó· ‰fiÓÙÈ·: OÚıÔ‰ÔÓÙÈ΋ ÚÔÛ¤ÁÁÈÛË P. PANOS Tooth ankylosis: Orthodontic implications

™ 1963
£O
OP
∂Í ÔÚÈÛÌÔ‡, Ë ‰ËÌÈÔ˘ÚÁ›· Û‡ÓÙË͢ ÌÂٷ͇ ÔÛÙ½Ó˘ impacted teeth that showed signs of carious lesions, or
Î·È Ê·ÙÓÈ·ÎÔ‡ ÔÛÙÔ‡ ÌÔÚ› Ó· Û˘Ì‚Â› ÔÔÈ·‰‹ÔÙ even restorations and crowns indicating that at some
ÛÙÈÁÌ‹ ηٿ ÙËÓ ‰È¿ÚÎÂÈ· Ù˘ ·Ó·ÙÔÏ‹˜ ÂÓfi˜ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡. point those teeth had emerged into the oral cavity (Pilo
ªÔÚ› Ó· ·Ú·ÙËÚËı› Û ‰fiÓÙÈ· Ô˘ ¤¯Ô˘Ó ·Ó·Ù›- et al., 1989).
ÏÂÈ Î·È ÂÌÊ·Ó›˙ÔÓÙ·È Ê˘ÛÈÔÏÔÁÈο ÛÙÔ ÙfiÍÔ. ∞˘Ùfi ÈÛ¯‡-
ÂÈ fiÙ·Ó Ë ·Á·ψÛË ‰ËÌÈÔ˘ÚÁËı› ·ÊÔ‡ ·Ó·Ù›ÏÔ˘Ó Ù· Malocclusion characteristics associated
with tooth ankylosis
˘·›ÙÈ· ‰fiÓÙÈ· ̤¯ÚÈ ÙÔ Â›Â‰Ô Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈÛ˘ Î·È ‰ÂÓ
Tooth ankylosis can be an etiologic factor in the
˘¿Ú¯ÂÈ ˘ÔÏÂÈfiÌÂÓË ·‡ÍËÛË. ŒÓ· ‰fiÓÙÈ ÌÔÚ› Ó· development of malocclusion. An ankylosed primary
·ÁÎ˘Ïˆı› ηٿ ÙËÓ ÂÓÂÚÁfi ·Ó·ÙÔÏ‹ ÙÔ˘ ÚÈÓ ÊÙ¿ÛÂÈ molar (especially the second deciduous molars)
ÛÙÔ Û˘ÁÎÏÂÈÛÈ·Îfi Â›Â‰Ô ‹ Ë ·Á·ψÛË Ó· ·ÚÔ˘- exhibits delayed exfoliation (Kula et al., 1984; Messer
ÛÈ·ÛÙ› Û ‰fiÓÙÈ· Ô˘ ‰ÂÓ ¤¯Ô˘Ó ·Ó·Ù›ÏÂÈ, ÚÔηÏÒ- and Cline, 1980). This may cause the succedaneous
ÓÙ·˜, ¤ÙÛÈ, ÙËÓ ¤ÁÎÏÂÈÛ‹ ÙÔ˘˜. tooth to become impacted or it may deflect them from
∏ ·Ó·ÙÔÏ‹ ·ÔÙÂÏ› Û˘Ó¯‹ ‰È·‰Èηۛ· Ô˘ ‰ÂÓ ÛÙ·- their normal eruption path with the consequence of
Ì·Ù¿ÂÈ fiÙ·Ó ÙÔ ‰fiÓÙÈ ¤ÚıÂÈ Û Â·Ê‹ Ì ÙÔÓ ·ÓÙ·ÁˆÓÈ- ectopic eruption. Furthermore, once ankylosis occurs,
ÛÙ‹ ÙÔ˘. ™Â Ó·ڋ ËÏÈΛ· Ë ·Ó·ÙÔÏ‹ ÙˆÓ ‰ÔÓÙÈÒÓ ·ÓÙÈ- the development of the alveolar process ceases. If
ÛÙ·ıÌ›˙ÂÈ ÙËÓ ·‡ÍËÛË Ù˘ ÁÓ¿ıÔ˘, ÂÓÒ Û ÌÂÁ·Ï‡ÙÂÚË neglected, it may lead to periodontal compromise of
·ÓÙÈÛÙ·ıÌ›˙ÂÈ ÙËÓ ·ÔÙÚÈ‚‹ ÙˆÓ ‰ÔÓÙÈÒÓ (Biederman, the adjacent teeth as well as the permanent successor
1962). √ ÚÒÙÔ˜ ÌfiÓÈÌÔ˜ ÁÔÌʛԘ, ·fi ÙË ÛÙÈÁÌ‹ (Krakowiak, 1978). However, Kurol and Olson
(1991) showed that infraocclusion and ankylosis do
Ô˘ ı· ÊÙ¿ÛÂÈ ÛÙÔ Â›Â‰Ô Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈÛ˘ Î·È ‚Ú›ÛÎÂÙ·È
not constitute a risk for future bone loss (Kurol and
Û ÏÂÈÙÔ˘ÚÁ›·, ·Ó·Ù¤ÏÏÂÈ ¿ÏÏÔ 1 cm ÂÚ›Ô˘ ·ÓÙÈ- Olson, 1991).
ÛÙ·ıÌ›˙ÔÓÙ·˜ ¤ÙÛÈ ÙËÓ ·‡ÍËÛË (Proffit Î·È Fields, Cephalometric and occlusal studies by Kula et al.
2000). ∞fi ÙË ÛÙÈÁÌ‹ Ô˘ ¤Ó· ÏÂÈÙÔ˘ÚÁÈÎfi ‰fiÓÙÈ (ÓÂÔ- (1984) displayed a high incidence of crossbites and
ÁÈÏfi ‹ ÌfiÓÈÌÔ) ·ÁÎ˘Ïˆı›, ·Ú·Ì¤ÓÂÈ ·Î›ÓËÙÔ ÛÙË dental aplasia related to tooth ankylosis. Most
ı¤ÛË ÙÔ˘ Î·È ‰ÂÓ ÌÔÚ› Ó· ÌÂÙ·ÎÈÓËı› ÚÔ˜ ÔÔÈ·- crossbites involved the buccal segments or buccal and
‰‹ÔÙ ‰È‡ı˘ÓÛË. ∆· ·Ú·Î›ÌÂÓ· ‰fiÓÙÈ· ÂÍ·ÎÔÏÔ˘- anterior segments (Kula et al., 1984).
ıÔ‡Ó Ó· ·Ó·Ù¤ÏÏÔ˘Ó Î·È ÙÔ Ê·ÙÓÈ·Îfi ÔÛÙÔ‡Ó ·˘Í¿ÓÂÈ, Other investigators support that ankylosis is responsible
ÂÓÒ ÙÔ ˘·›ÙÈÔ ‰fiÓÙÈ ·Ú·Ì¤ÓÂÈ ÛÙÔ Â›Â‰Ô Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈ- for the development of a posterior open bite that
Û˘ fiÔ˘ ‚ÚÈÛÎfiÙ·Ó Î·Ù¿ ÙËÓ ¤Ó·ÚÍË Ù˘ ·Á·ψÛ˘. subsequently leads to a tongue habit (Krakowiak,
∞˘Ùfi ‰›ÓÂÈ ÙË Ï·Óı·Ṳ̂ÓË ÂÓÙ‡ˆÛË ÂÌ‚‡ıÈÛ˘ ÙÔ˘ 1978).
·ÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤ÓÔ˘ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡. ∫ÂÊ·ÏÔÌÂÙÚÈΤ˜ ÌÂϤÙ˜ ¤‰ÂÈ- In addition, a submerged ankylosed tooth (primary or
permanent) will cause adjacent teeth to incline over it.
Í·Ó fiÙÈ Ë ÂÌ‚‡ıÈÛË Â›Ó·È ·ÔÙ¤ÏÂÛÌ· Ù˘ ÂÚÈ·Îψ-
This tipping will also cause a decrease in the arch
Û˘ ÙÔ˘ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡ ·fi ÙÔ˘˜ ÂÚÈ‚¿ÏÏÔÓÙ˜ ÈÛÙÔ‡˜ Î·È circumference, resulting in loss of arch length and
‰ÂÓ ÔÊ›ÏÂÙ·È Û ÂÓÂÚÁfi Ô‰ÔÓÙÈ΋ ÌÂٷΛÓËÛË (Konstat midline shifting towards the affected side. Moreover,
Î·È White, 1975). √ ‚·ıÌfi˜ ÂÌ‚‡ıÈÛ˘ Â›Ó·È ·Ó¿- since the occlusal surface of the affected tooth is below
ÏÔÁÔ˜ Ì ÙÔ Ú˘ıÌfi ·‡ÍËÛ˘ ÙÔ˘ ÚÔÛÒÔ˘ (Lamb Î·È the occlusal plane, the antagonist supra-erupts until it
Reed, 1968). reaches a contact point.

¢Â˘ÙÂÚÔÁÂÓ‹˜ ¤ÁÎÏÂÈÛË / ∞ÙÂÏ‹˜ ·Ó·ÙÔÏ‹ Protocol of orthodontic treatment related


∞Ó ¤Ó· ‰fiÓÙÈ (ÓÂÔÁÈÏfi ‹ ÌfiÓÈÌÔ) ·ÁÎ˘Ïˆı› ÚÈÓ ÊÙ¿- to potentially ankylosed teeth
ÛÂÈ ÛÙÔ Â›Â‰Ô Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈÛ˘, ıˆÚÂ›Ù·È fiÙÈ ¤¯ÂÈ ·Ó·- As stated previously for the correct management of an
Ù›ÏÂÈ ·ÙÂÏÒ˜. ankylosed tooth, early diagnosis is essential.
∏ ‰Â˘ÙÂÚÔÁÂÓ‹˜ ¤ÁÎÏÂÈÛË Â›Ó·È Ô˘ÛÈ·ÛÙÈο ·ÎÚ·›· Consequently a thorough examination and evaluation
need to be preformed as already described. In this
ÂÚ›ÙˆÛË, Ô˘ ·ÎÔÏÔ˘ı› Û˘Ó‹ıˆ˜ ÙËÓ ·ÙÂÏ‹ ·Ó·ÙÔ-
section the specific points of the initial examination are
Ï‹ ÙÔ˘ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡. ∏ ·Á·ψÛË ÂÓfi˜ ÓÂÔÁÈÏÔ‡ ÁÔÌÊ›Ô˘ outlined that need to be evaluated in order to establish
ÂÍÂÏ›ÛÛÂÙ·È ÚÔԉ¢ÙÈο ·˘Í¿ÓÔÓÙ·˜ ÙËÓ ·fiÛÙ·ÛË the diagnosis of an ankylosed tooth.
ÙÔ˘ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡ ·fi ÙÔ Â›Â‰Ô Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈÛ˘ Ù˘ ˘fiÏÔÈ-
˘ Ô‰ÔÓÙÔÊ˘›·˜. ™Â ‰Â‰Ô̤ÓË ÛÙÈÁÌ‹, Ù· ·Ú·Î›ÌÂ- General Medical History
Ó· ‰fiÓÙÈ· ¯¿ÓÔ˘Ó Ù· ÛËÌ›· Â·Ê‹˜ ÙÔ˘˜ Î·È ·ÔÎÏ›- - Congenital diseases like cleidocranial dysostosis
ÓÔ˘Ó ÛÙÔ ¯ÒÚÔ Ô˘ ‰ËÌÈÔ˘ÚÁÂ›Ù·È Â¿Óˆ ·fi ÙË Ì‡ÏË and ectodermal dysplasia predispose to multiple

E§§HNIKH OP£O¢ONTIKH E¶I£EøPH™H 2003 ñ TOMO™ 6 83 HELLENIC ORTHODONTIC REVIEW 2003 ñ VOLUME 6
A
PEI E§
AI

ET

§A
¢ONTIKH

¢O
¶. ¶ANO™ AÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤Ó· ‰fiÓÙÈ·: OÚıÔ‰ÔÓÙÈ΋ ÚÔÛ¤ÁÁÈÛË P. PANOS Tooth ankylosis: Orthodontic implications

™ 1963
£O
OP
ÙÔ˘ ÓÂÔÁÈÏÔ‡ ÁÔÌÊ›Ô˘ Ô˘ ÂÌ‚˘ı›˙ÂÙ·È. ∆Ô Ê·ÙÓÈ·Îfi tooth ankylosis.
ÔÛÙÔ‡Ó ·ÎÔÏÔ˘ı› ÙÔÓ ÓÂÔÁÈÏfi ÁÔÌÊ›Ô Ì ·ÔÙ¤ÏÂÛÌ· - Family records are helpful since there is a familiar
ÙÔ ‰fiÓÙÈ Ó· ‚ÚÂı› ÂÎÙfi˜ ÂÈ¤‰Ô˘ Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈÛ˘ ̤¯ÚÈ tendency for the disorder (Pedersen and Hallett,
ÛËÌ›Ԣ Ï‹ÚÔ˘˜ ¤ÁÎÏÂÈÛ˘, ÂÓÒ Ù· ·Ú·Î›ÌÂÓ· 1994).
‰fiÓÙÈ· ÌÔÚ› Ó· ¤ÚıÔ˘Ó Û Â·Ê‹ ηٷϷ̂¿ÓÔÓÙ·˜ - There are systemic causes of delayed eruption that
Ï‹Úˆ˜ ÙÔÓ ¯ÒÚÔ fiÔ˘ ‚ÚÈÛÎfiÙ·Ó ÚÔËÁÔ˘Ì¤Óˆ˜ Ô have to be taken into account in order to differentiate
between delayed eruption and ankylosis (Kracke,
ÓÂÔÁÈÏfi˜ ÁÔÌʛԘ (Spyropoulou, 2000). ∏ ηٿÛÙ·-
1966). These include:
ÛË ·˘Ù‹ ÂÚÈÁÚ¿ÊÂÙ·È ˆ˜ ‰Â˘ÙÂÚÔÁÂÓ‹˜ ¤ÁÎÏÂÈÛË. - osteopetrosis
ªÔÚ› Ó· ·ÚÔ˘ÛÈ·ÛÙ› Î·È ÛÙ· ‰‡Ô Ô‰ÔÓÙÈο ÙfiÍ· - hypopituitarism
Ì ·fiÎÏÈÛË ÙˆÓ ÁÂÈÙÔÓÈÎÒÓ ‰ÔÓÙÈÒÓ Î·È ˘ÂÚ¤ÎÊ˘ÛË - hypothyroidism
ÙˆÓ ·ÓÙ·ÁˆÓÈÛÙÒÓ. ∂ÌÊ·Ó›˙ÂÙ·È Û˘¯ÓfiÙÂÚ· ÛÙËÓ ¿Óˆ - avitaminosis A and D
ÁÓ¿ıÔ Î·È ÙÔ ‰fiÓÙÈ Ô˘ ÚÔÛ‚¿ÏÏÂÙ·È Û˘¯ÓfiÙÂÚ· - fanconis syndrome
Â›Ó·È Ô ‰Â‡ÙÂÚÔ˜ ÓÂÔÁÈÏfi˜ ÁÔÌʛԘ. - vitamin D resistant rickets
∏ ‰È¿ÁÓˆÛË Á›ÓÂÙ·È Ì ‚¿ÛË ÙËÓ ÎÏÈÓÈ΋ Î·È ·ÎÙÈÓÔ- - mongolism
ÁÚ·ÊÈ΋ ÂͤٷÛË. ∫ÏÈÓÈο ÛËÌ›· Ô˘ ˘Ô‰ÂÈÎÓ‡Ô˘Ó - acrocephalosyndactyly
‰Â˘ÙÂÚÔÁÂÓ‹ ¤ÁÎÏÂÈÛË Â›Ó·È Ë ·Ô˘Û›· ÙfiÛÔ ÙÔ˘ ÓÂÔ- - epidermolysis bullosa
ÁÈÏÔ‡ fiÛÔ Î·È ÙÔ˘ ÌfiÓÈÌÔ˘ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡ ·fi ÙÔ Ô‰ÔÓÙÈÎfi
ÙfiÍÔ, Ë ·fiÎÏÈÛË ÙˆÓ ÁÂÈÙÔÓÈÎÒÓ ‰ÔÓÙÈÒÓ Î·È Ë ·ÚÔ˘- Dental History
- Traumatic injury to the teeth can lead to ankylosis, so
Û›· ÂÈıËÏÈ·ÎÔ‡ ۈϋӷ ÛÙËÓ ÎÔÚ˘Ê‹ Ù˘ Ê·ÙÓȷ΋˜
any history of trauma should be recorded.
·fiÊ˘Û˘, ÁÂÁÔÓfi˜ Ô˘ ·Ô‰ÂÈÎÓ‡ÂÈ fiÙÈ Ë ·Á·ψÛË - Pain and soreness in the area of a missing tooth
ÂÈÛ˘Ó¤‚Ë ÌÂÙ¿ ÙËÓ ·Ó¿‰˘ÛË (Biederman, 1962). should be recorded.
∞·Ú·›ÙËÙË ÁÈ· ÙË ‰È¿ÁÓˆÛË Â›Ó·È Ë ·ÎÙÈÓÔÁÚ·ÊÈ΋ - Questions concerning previous extractions should be
ÂͤٷÛË. ªÔÚ› Ó· ·Ôηχ„ÂÈ ÙËÓ ·Á·ψÛË ÙÔ˘ asked.
ÓÂÔÁÈÏÔ‡ ÁÔÌÊ›Ô˘ Î·È ÙËÓ ·ÚÔ˘Û›· ÙÔ˘ ÌÔÓ›ÌÔ˘ ‰È·-
‰fi¯Ô˘, ÂÎÙfi˜ ·Ó ·˘Ùfi˜ ÂÏÏ›ÂÈ Û˘ÁÁÂÓÒ˜. À¿Ú¯Ô˘Ó Clinical examination
·Ó·ÊÔÚ¤˜ ‰Â˘ÙÂÚÔÁÂÓÔ‡˜ ¤ÁÎÏÂÈÛ˘ ‰ÔÓÙÈÒÓ Ì ÙÂÚË- - Presence of infraocclusion.
‰ÔÓÈΤ˜ ‚Ï¿‚˜ ‹ ·ÎfiÌË Î·È Ì ·ÔηٷÛÙ¿ÛÂȘ Î·È - Location and extent of infraocclusion.
ÛÙÂÊ¿Ó˜, ηٷÛÙ¿ÛÂȘ Ô˘ ‰Â›¯ÓÔ˘Ó fiÙÈ Ù· ‰fiÓÙÈ· - Percussion sound of suspected tooth recorded.
·˘Ù¿ ›¯·Ó οÔÙ ·Ó·Ù›ÏÂÈ ÛÙË ÛÙÔÌ·ÙÈ΋ ÎÔÈÏfiÙËÙ· - Mobility test of suspected tooth performed.
(Pilo Î·È Û˘Ó., 1989). - Degree of tilting of adjacent teeth evaluated.
- Primary and permanent teeth missing from the dental
arch noted.
÷ڷÎÙËÚÈÛÙÈο Û˘ÁÎÏÂÈÛÈ·ÎÒÓ ‰È·Ù·Ú·¯ÒÓ Ô˘ Û¯ÂÙ›- - Presence of malocclusion caused by a potentially
˙ÔÓÙ·È Ì ·ÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤Ó· ‰fiÓÙÈ· ankylosed tooth.
∏ ·Á·ψÛË ÌÔÚ› Ó· ·ÔÙÂÏ› ·ÈÙÈÔÏÔÁÈÎfi ·Ú¿ÁÔ- - Midline shift
ÓÙ· ‰ËÌÈÔ˘ÚÁ›·˜ Û˘ÁÎÏÂÈÛȷ΋˜ ‰È·Ù·Ú·¯‹˜. √ ·Á΢-
ψ̤ÓÔ˜ ÓÂÔÁÈÏfi˜ ÁÔÌʛԘ (ÂȉÈο ÔÈ ‰Â‡ÙÂÚÔÈ ÓÂÔÁÈ- Radiographic examination
ÏÔ› ÁÔÌÊ›ÔÈ) ·ÚÔ˘ÛÈ¿˙ÂÈ Î·ı˘ÛÙ¤ÚËÛË ÛÙËÓ ·fiÙˆ- - Presence of secondary impaction of deciduous
Û‹ ÙÔ˘ (Kula Î·È Û˘Ó., 1984; Messer Î·È Cline, tooth.
1980). ŒÙÛÈ ÌÔÚ› Ù· ‰È¿‰Ô¯· ÌfiÓÈÌ· ‰fiÓÙÈ· Ó· - Presence of impacted tooth.
·Ú·Ì›ÓÔ˘Ó ¤ÁÎÏÂÈÛÙ· ‹ Ó· ÂÎÙÚ·Ô‡Ó ·fi ÙË Ê˘ÛÈÔ- - Cause of impaction.
ÏÔÁÈ΋ Ô‰fi ·Ó·ÙÔÏ‹˜ ÙÔ˘˜ Î·È Ó· ·Ó·Ù›ÏÔ˘Ó ¤ÎÙÔ·. - Presence of normal or obliterated periodontal
∂ÈϤÔÓ, Ë ‰ËÌÈÔ˘ÚÁ›· ·Á·ψÛ˘ Ô‰ËÁ› Û ·Ó·- ligament around infraoccluded or impacted teeth.
- Abnormal root formation of an impacted tooth.
ÛÙÔÏ‹ Ù˘ ·Ó¿Ù˘Í˘ Ù˘ Ê·ÙÓȷ΋˜ ·fiÊ˘Û˘. ∞Ó Ë
- If possible comparison with earlier x-rays:
ηٿÛÙ·ÛË ·˘Ù‹ ·Ú·ÌÂÏËı›, ÌÔÚ› Ó· ‰ËÌÈÔ˘ÚÁË- - compare occlusal level of infraoccluded teeth
ıÔ‡Ó ÂÚÈÔ‰ÔÓÙÈο ÚÔ‚Ï‹Ì·Ù· ÛÙ· ÁÂÈÙÔÓÈο ‰fiÓÙÈ· - position of impacted tooth & degree of root
fiˆ˜ Î·È ÛÙÔ ÌfiÓÈÌÔ ‰È¿‰Ô¯Ô (Krakowiak, 1978). ∂Ó development.
ÙÔ‡ÙÔȘ, ÌÂϤÙË ÙˆÓ Kurol Î·È Olson (1991) ¤‰ÂÈÍ fiÙÈ
Ë ·ÙÂÏ‹˜ Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈÛË Î·È Ë ·Á·ψÛË ‰ÂÓ ·ÔÙÂÏÔ‡Ó Study casts
Èı·Ófi ΛӉ˘ÓÔ ÁÈ· ÌÂÏÏÔÓÙÈ΋ ·ÒÏÂÈ· ÔÛÙÔ‡ (Kurol - Identify tipping and rotation of teeth.

E§§HNIKH OP£O¢ONTIKH E¶I£EøPH™H 2003 ñ TOMO™ 6 84 HELLENIC ORTHODONTIC REVIEW 2003 ñ VOLUME 6
A
PEI E§
AI

ET

§A
¢ONTIKH

¢O
¶. ¶ANO™ AÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤Ó· ‰fiÓÙÈ·: OÚıÔ‰ÔÓÙÈ΋ ÚÔÛ¤ÁÁÈÛË P. PANOS Tooth ankylosis: Orthodontic implications

™ 1963
£O
OP
Î·È Olson, 1991). - Measurement of infraocclusion and available space.
∫ÂÊ·ÏÔÌÂÙÚÈΤ˜ Î·È ÌÂϤÙ˜ Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈÛ˘ ÙˆÓ Kula Î·È - Presence of malocclusion caused by a potentially
Û˘Ó. ¤‰ÂÈÍ·Ó ·˘ÍË̤ÓË Â›ÙˆÛË ÛÙ·˘ÚÔÂȉԇ˜ ankylosed tooth.
Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈÛ˘ Î·È Ô‰ÔÓÙÈ΋˜ ·Ï·Û›·˜ Ô˘ Û˘Û¯ÂÙ›˙Ô-
ÓÙ·È Ì ·ÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤Ó· ‰fiÓÙÈ·. ∏ ÏÂÈÔ„ËÊ›· ÙˆÓ ÛÙ·˘- Teeth suspected to be ankylosed
ÚÔÂȉÒÓ Û˘ÁÎÏ›ÛÂˆÓ ·ÊÔÚÔ‡Û ÛÙ· ·ÚÂȷο ‹ ÛÙ· - Any tooth that was at the occlusal level and
·ÚÂȷο Î·È ÚfiÛıÈ· ÙÌ‹Ì·Ù· (Kula Î·È Û˘Ó., subsequently dropped out of it.
- An unerupted tooth beyond adolescence.
1984).
- An impacted tooth that stops moving after the
ÕÏÏÔÈ ÂÚ¢ÓËÙ¤˜ ˘ÔÛÙËÚ›˙Ô˘Ó fiÙÈ Ë ·Á·ψÛË Â˘ı‡-
application of orthodontic force.
ÓÂÙ·È ÁÈ· ÙË ‰ËÌÈÔ˘ÚÁ›· Ô›ÛıÈ·˜ ·ÓˆÁ̤Ó˘ ‰‹Í˘ - An impacted tooth with radiographic signs of
Ô˘ Ô‰ËÁ› ·ÎÔÏÔ‡ıˆ˜ Û ÁψÛÛÈΤ˜ ¤ÍÂȘ obliterated periodontal ligament.
(Krakowiak, 1978). - An infraoccluded tooth.
∂ÈϤÔÓ, ¤Ó· ÂÌ‚˘ıÈṲ̂ÓÔ ·ÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤ÓÔ ‰fiÓÙÈ (ÓÂÔÁÈ- - Canted occlusal plane as a reaction to orthodontic
Ïfi ‹ ÌfiÓÈÌÔ) ı· ÚÔηϤÛÂÈ ·fiÎÏÈÛË ÙˆÓ ÁÂÈÙÔÓÈÎÒÓ forces applied to the tooth.
‰ÔÓÙÈÒÓ Â¿Óˆ ·fi ·˘Ùfi. ∏ ·fiÎÏÈÛË, Ì ÙË ÛÂÈÚ¿
Ù˘, ı· Ô‰ËÁ‹ÛÂÈ Û Ì›ˆÛË Ù˘ ÂÚÈ̤ÙÚÔ˘ ÙÔ˘ ÙfiÍÔ˘, Patient consultation
Ì›ˆÛË ÙÔ˘ Ì‹ÎÔ˘˜ ÙÔ˘ ÙfiÍÔ˘ Î·È ÌÂÙ·ÙfiÈÛË Ù˘ ̤Û˘ The patient should understand that treatment of the
ÁÚ·ÌÌ‹˜ ÚÔ˜ ÙËÓ ÏÂ˘Ú¿ Ì ÙÔ Úfi‚ÏËÌ·. ∞ÎfiÌË, tooth may either not produce tooth movement or result
·ÊÔ‡ Ë Ì·ÛËÙÈ΋ ÂÈÊ¿ÓÂÈ· ÙÔ˘ ˘·›ÙÈÔ˘ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡ ‚Ú›- in the need for endodontic treatment or even loss of the
ÛÎÂÙ·È Î¿Ùˆ ·fi ÙÔ Â›Â‰Ô Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈÛ˘, Ô ·ÓÙ·ÁˆÓÈ- tooth. Patient consent should address treatment options
ÛÙ‹˜ ˘ÂÚÂÎʇÂÙ·È Ì¤¯ÚÈ Ó· ·ÔÎÙ‹ÛÂÈ ÛËÌÂ›Ô Â·- for impacted teeth and associated treatment
Ê‹˜. complications.

What to do and what not to do


¶ÚˆÙfiÎÔÏÏÔ ÔÚıÔ‰ÔÓÙÈ΋˜ ıÂÚ·›·˜ ÁÈ· ÂÓ ‰˘Ó¿ÌÂÈ
- Premolars should not be extracted if it is not known
·ÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤Ó· ‰fiÓÙÈ· whether an impacted canine is ankylosed.
Ÿˆ˜ ÂÈÒıËΠÚÔËÁÔ˘Ì¤Óˆ˜, Ë ÚÒÈÌË ‰È¿ÁÓˆÛË - Ankylosed teeth, which could provide anchorage
Â›Ó·È ‚·ÛÈ΋˜ ÛËÌ·Û›·˜ ÁÈ· ÙË ÛˆÛÙ‹ ·ÓÙÈÌÂÙÒÈÛË during an orthodontic treatment should not be
ÂÓfi˜ ·ÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤ÓÔ˘ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡. ™˘ÓÂÒ˜, Ú¤ÂÈ Ó· ‰ÈÂ- extracted. However, these teeth should not be the
Í·¯ı› ÏÂÙÔÌÂÚ‹˜ ÂͤٷÛË Î·È ÂÎÙ›ÌËÛË fiˆ˜ ‹‰Ë cause of malocclusion and should not jeopardize the
ÂÚÈÁÚ¿ÊËÎÂ. ™ÙÔ ÛËÌÂ›Ô ·˘Ùfi ı· ˘ÔÁÚ·ÌÌÈÛÙÔ‡Ó Ù· treatment course.
Û˘ÁÎÂÎÚÈ̤ӷ ÛËÌ›· Ô˘ Ú¤ÂÈ Ó· ·ÍÈÔÏÔÁËıÔ‡Ó - In case of forced eruption it is not advisable to use a
ηٿ ÙËÓ ·Ú¯È΋ ÂͤٷÛË, ¤ÙÛÈ ÒÛÙ ӷ ÙÂı› Ë ‰È¿ÁÓˆ- wire ligature around the cemento-enamel junction of
ÛË fiÙÈ ¤Ó· ‰fiÓÙÈ Â›Ó·È ·ÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤ÓÔ. the tooth.

°ÂÓÈÎfi π·ÙÚÈÎfi ÈÛÙÔÚÈÎfi


- ™˘ÁÁÂÓ›˜ ÓfiÛÔÈ, fiˆ˜ Ë ÎÏÂȉÔÎÚ·Óȷ΋ ‰˘ÛfiÛÙˆÛË CONCLUSIONS
Î·È Ë Â͈‰ÂÚÌÈ΋ ‰˘ÛÏ·Û›· Úԉȷı¤ÙÔ˘Ó Û ·Á·-
ψÛË ÔÏÏÒÓ ‰ÔÓÙÈÒÓ. Tooth ankylosis is a common pathologic problem in the
- ∆· ÔÈÎÔÁÂÓÂȷο ·Ú¯Â›· ÌÔÚ› Ó· ‚ÔËı‹ÛÔ˘Ó, ·ÊÔ‡ primary dentition and less frequently in the permanent
Â›Ó·È ÁÓˆÛÙfi fiÙÈ ˘¿Ú¯ÂÈ ÔÈÎÔÁÂÓ‹˜ Ù¿ÛË Ù˘ ‰È·Ù·- teeth. The etiology of the condition has not yet been
established.
Ú·¯‹˜ ·˘Ù‹˜ (Pedersen Î·È Hallett, 1994).
The clinical picture of the affected tooth may range
- À¿Ú¯Ô˘Ó Û˘ÛÙËÌ·ÙÈο ·›ÙÈ· ηı˘ÛÙ¤ÚËÛ˘ Ù˘ ·Ó·-
from impaction to different degrees of infraocclusion. If
ÙÔÏ‹˜ Ô˘ Ú¤ÂÈ Ó· ÏËÊıÔ‡Ó ˘’ fi„ÈÓ ÒÛÙ ӷ ‰È·- ankylosis occurs late in growth, the infraocclusion may
ÊÔÚԉȷÁÓˆÛÙ› Ë Î·ı˘ÛÙÂÚË̤ÓË ·Ó·ÙÔÏ‹ ·fi ÙËÓ be expected to progress at a diminished rate.
·Á·ψÛË (Kracke, 1966). ∞˘Ù¿ ÂÚÈÏ·Ì‚¿ÓÔ˘Ó: However, early ankylosis predisposes to submersion.
- ÔÛÙÂÔ¤ÙÚˆÛË This affects only deciduous teeth, usually second
- ˘Ô-¸ÔÊ˘ÛÈ·ÛÌfi deciduous maxillary molars.
- ˘Ôı˘ÚÂÔÂȉÈÛÌfi Diagnosis is usually easy to establish on erupted teeth.
- ·‚Èٷ̛ӈÛË ∞ Î·È D It is based on mobility and percussion test in correlation

E§§HNIKH OP£O¢ONTIKH E¶I£EøPH™H 2003 ñ TOMO™ 6 85 HELLENIC ORTHODONTIC REVIEW 2003 ñ VOLUME 6
A
PEI E§
AI

ET

§A
¢ONTIKH

¢O
¶. ¶ANO™ AÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤Ó· ‰fiÓÙÈ·: OÚıÔ‰ÔÓÙÈ΋ ÚÔÛ¤ÁÁÈÛË P. PANOS Tooth ankylosis: Orthodontic implications

™ 1963
£O
OP
- Û‡Ó‰ÚÔÌÔ Fanconi with the clinical characteristics of infraocclusion.
- Ú·¯›Ùȉ· ·ÓıÂÎÙÈ΋ ÛÙË ‚ÈÙ·Ì›ÓË D Radiographic examination does not always show the
- ÌÔÁÁÔÏÈÛÌfi area of fusion.
- ·ÎÚÔÎÂÊ·ÏÔÛ˘Ó‰·ÎÙ˘Ï›· Proper treatment of the deciduous teeth and a careful
- Ê˘ÛÛ·ÏÈ‰Ò‰Ë ÂȉÂÚÌfiÏ˘ÛË follow up ensure a normal development of the
permanent dentition. Ankylosis on permanent teeth
requires more radical treatment.
√‰ÔÓÙÈ·ÙÚÈÎfi ÈÛÙÔÚÈÎfi
- ∆Ú·˘Ì·ÙÈ΋ ‚Ï¿‚Ë ÛÙ· ‰fiÓÙÈ· ÌÔÚ› Ó· Ô‰ËÁ‹ÛÂÈ ÛÂ
·Á·ψÛË. ™˘ÓÂÒ˜, Ú¤ÂÈ Ó· ηٷÁÚ¿ÊÂÙ·È Î¿ı REFERENCES
ÈÛÙÔÚÈÎfi ÙÚ·‡Ì·ÙÔ˜.
- ¶Ú¤ÂÈ Ó· ηٷÁÚ¿ÊÂÙ·È Î¿ı fiÓÔ˜ Î·È Â˘·ÈÛıËÛ›· Achi-Beaini B, Skaf Z. Secondary retention of primary
ÛÙËÓ ÂÚÈÔ¯‹ ÂÏÏ›ÔÓÙÔ˜ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡ molars. Diagnosis and treatment. Dental News
- √ ·ÛıÂÓ‹˜ Ú¤ÂÈ Ó· ÂÚˆÙ¿Ù·È Û¯ÂÙÈο Ì ÚÔËÁÔ‡- 2001;11:25-8.
ÌÂÓ˜ ÂÍ·ÁˆÁ¤˜ ‰ÔÓÙÈÒÓ. Albers DD. Ankylosis of teeth in the developing
dentition. Quintess Int 1986;17:303-8.
∫ÏÈÓÈ΋ ÂͤٷÛË Andersson L, Blomlof L, Lindskog S, Feiglin B,
- ¶·ÚÔ˘Û›· ‰ÔÓÙÈÒÓ Î¿Ùˆ ÙÔ˘ ÂÈ¤‰Ô˘ Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈÛ˘ Hammarstom L. Tooth ankylosis. Clinical,
(·ÙÂÏ‹˜ Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈÛË). radiographic and histological assessments. Int J
Oral Surg 1984;13:423-31.
- ∂ÓÙfiÈÛË Î·È ‚·ıÌfi˜ ·ÙÂÏÔ‡˜ Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈÛ˘.
Andreasen JO. Periodontal healing after replantation
- ∫·Ù·ÁÚ·Ê‹ ÂÈÎÚÔ˘ÛÙÈÎÔ‡ ‹¯Ô˘ ÙˆÓ ‰ÔÓÙÈÒÓ Ì ˘Ô- and autotransplantation of incisors in monkeys. Int J
„›· ·Á·ψÛ˘. Oral Surg 1981;10:54-61.
- ¢ÔÎÈÌ·Û›· ÎÈÓËÙÈÎfiÙËÙ·˜ ÛÙ· ‰fiÓÙÈ· Ì ˘Ô„›· ·Á·- Atwan S, Des Rosiers D. Infraocclusion of lower
ψÛ˘. primary molar with other familial abnormlities.
- ∂ÎÙ›ÌËÛË ÙÔ˘ ‚·ıÌÔ‡ ·fiÎÏÈÛ˘ ÙˆÓ ·Ú·Î›ÌÂÓˆÓ Report of a case. J Dent Child 1998;65:272-5.
‰ÔÓÙÈÒÓ. Biederman W. The incidence and etiology of tooth
- ™ËÌ›ˆÛË ÙˆÓ ÓÂÔÁÈÏÒÓ Î·È ÌfiÓÈÌˆÓ ‰ÔÓÙÈÒÓ Ô˘ Ï›- ankylosis. Am J Orthod 1956;42:921-6.
Ô˘Ó ·fi Ù· Ô‰ÔÓÙÈο ÙfiÍ·. Biederman W. Etiology and treatment of tooth
- ¶·ÚÔ˘Û›· Û˘ÁÎÏÂÈÛȷ΋˜ ‰È·Ù·Ú·¯‹˜ Ô˘ ÔÊ›ÏÂÙ·È ankylosis. Am J Orthod 1962;49:670-84.
Û ÂÓ ‰˘Ó¿ÌÂÈ ·ÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤ÓÔ ‰fiÓÙÈ. Brearley LJ, McKibben DH Jr. Ankylosis of primary
- ªÂÙ·ÙfiÈÛË Ù˘ ̤Û˘ ÁÚ·ÌÌ‹˜ ÙˆÓ Ô‰ÔÓÙÈÎÒÓ Ùfi͈Ó. molar teeth. Prevalence and characteristics. J Dent
Child 1973;40:54-63.
Brown D. Some further observations on submerging
∞ÎÙÈÓÔÁÚ·ÊÈ΋ ÂͤٷÛË molars. Br J Orthod 1981;8:99-107.
- ¢Â˘ÙÂÚÔÁÂÓ‹˜ ¤ÁÎÏÂÈÛË ÓÂÔÁÈÏÔ‡ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡. Elefteriadis JN, Athanasiou AE. Evaluation of impacted
- ¶·ÚÔ˘Û›· ¤ÁÎÏÂÈÛÙÔ˘ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡. canines by means of computerized tomography. Int
- ∞›ÙÈÔ ¤ÁÎÏÂÈÛ˘. J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1996;11:257-
- ¶·ÚÔ˘Û›· Ê˘ÛÈÔÏÔÁÈÎÔ‡ ‹ ÌË ÂÚÈÔ‰ÔÓÙÈÎÔ‡ Û˘Ó‰¤- 64.
ÛÌÔ˘ Á‡Úˆ ·fi ‰fiÓÙÈ· Ô˘ ‚Ú›ÛÎÔÓÙ·È Î¿Ùˆ ·fi ÙÔ Frank AC. Treatment options for impacted teeth. JADA
Â›Â‰Ô Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈÛ˘ ‹ Â›Ó·È ¤ÁÎÏÂÈÛÙ·. 2000;131:623-31.
- ∞ÓÒÌ·ÏË ‰È¿Ï·ÛË Ù˘ Ú›˙·˜ ¤ÁÎÏÂÈÛÙÔ˘ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡. Graber TM. Periodontal/Orthodontic interrelation-
- ™‡ÁÎÚÈÛË Ì ÚÔËÁÔ‡ÌÂÓ˜ ·ÎÙÈÓÔÁڷʛ˜, ÂÊ’ fiÛÔÓ ships. In: Graber TM, ed. Orthodontics principles
·˘Ùfi Â›Ó·È ‰˘Ó·Ùfi: and practice. Philadelphia: WB Saunders,
- Û‡ÁÎÚÈÛË ÙÔ˘ Û˘ÁÎÏÂÈÛÈ·ÎÔ‡ ÂÈ¤‰Ô˘ ÙˆÓ 1966:829-36.
Geiger AM, Bronsky MJ. Orthodontic managment of
‰ÔÓÙÈÒÓ Û ·ÙÂÏ‹ Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈÛË.
ankylosed teeth. A cinical report of three cases. Am
- ı¤ÛË ÙÔ˘ ¤ÁÎÏÂÈÛÙÔ˘ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡ Î·È ‚·ıÌfi˜ ‰È¿- J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;106:543-8.
Ï·Û˘ Ù˘ Ú›˙·˜. Henderson HZ. Ankylosis of primary molars. A clinical,
radiographic and histologic study. J Dent Child
∂ÎÌ·Á›· ÌÂϤÙ˘ 1979;46:117-22.
- ∞fiÎÏÈÛË Î·È ÛÙÚÔÊ‹ ‰ÔÓÙÈÒÓ. Konstat M, White G. Ankylosed teeth. A review of the
- ª¤ÙÚËÛË ÙÔ˘ ‚·ıÌÔ‡ ·ÙÂÏÔ‡˜ Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈÛ˘ Î·È ‰È·- literature. J Mass Dent Society 1975;24:74-8.

E§§HNIKH OP£O¢ONTIKH E¶I£EøPH™H 2003 ñ TOMO™ 6 86 HELLENIC ORTHODONTIC REVIEW 2003 ñ VOLUME 6
A
PEI E§
AI

ET

§A
¢ONTIKH

¢O
¶. ¶ANO™ AÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤Ó· ‰fiÓÙÈ·: OÚıÔ‰ÔÓÙÈ΋ ÚÔÛ¤ÁÁÈÛË P. PANOS Tooth ankylosis: Orthodontic implications

™ 1963
£O
OP
ı¤ÛÈÌÔ˘ ¯ÒÚÔ˘. Kracke RR. Delayed tooth eruption versus impaction. J
- ¶·ÚÔ˘Û›· Û˘ÁÎÏÂÈÛȷ΋˜ ‰È·Ù·Ú·¯‹˜ Ô˘ ÔÊ›ÏÂÙ·È Dent Child 1975;42:371-4.
Û ÂÓ ‰˘Ó¿ÌÂÈ ·ÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤ÓÔ ‰fiÓÙÈ. Kracke RR. Clinical approach to Oral Pathology. J Dent
- ªÂÙ·ÙfiÈÛË Ù˘ ̤Û˘ ÁÚ·ÌÌ‹˜ ÙˆÓ Ô‰ÔÓÙÈÎÒÓ Ùfi͈Ó. Child 1966;33:375-7.
Krakowiak JF. Ankylosed primary molars. J Dent Child
¢fiÓÙÈ· Ì ˘Ô„›· ·Á·ψÛ˘ 1978;45:288-92.
Kula K, Tatum BM, Owen D, Smith RJ, Rule J. An
- ∫¿ı ‰fiÓÙÈ Ô˘ ‚ÚÈÛÎfiÙ·Ó ÛÙÔ Â›Â‰Ô Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈÛ˘
occlusal and cephalometric study of children with
Î·È ÛÙË Û˘Ó¤¯ÂÈ· ‚Ú¤ıËΠοو ·fi ·˘Ùfi. ankylosis of primary molars. J Pedod 1984;8:146-
- ¢fiÓÙÈ Ô˘ ‰ÂÓ ¤¯ÂÈ ·Ó·Ù›ÏÂÈ ·ÎfiÌË Î·È ÌÂÙ¿ ÙËÓ ÂÊË- 59.
‚›·. Kurol J, Koch G. The effect of extraction of
- ŒÁÎÏÂÈÛÙÔ ‰fiÓÙÈ Ô˘ ÛÙ·Ì·Ù¿ÂÈ Ó· ÌÂÙ·ÎÈÓÂ›Ù·È ÌÂÙ¿ infraoccluded deciduous molars. A longitudinal
·fi ÂÊ·ÚÌÔÁ‹ ÔÚıÔ‰ÔÓÙÈ΋˜ ‰‡Ó·Ì˘. study. Am J Orthod 1985;87:46-55.
- ŒÁÎÏÂÈÛÙÔ ‰fiÓÙÈ Ì ·ÎÙÈÓÔÁÚ·ÊÈο ÛËÌ›· ÂÍ·ÏÂÈÊı¤- Kurol J, Magnusson BC. Infraocclusion of primary
ÓÙÔ˜ ÂÚÈÔ‰ÔÓÙÈÎÔ‡ Û˘Ó‰¤ÛÌÔ˘. molars: a histologic study. Scand J Dent Res
- ¢fiÓÙÈ Ô˘ ‚Ú›ÛÎÂÙ·È Î¿Ùˆ ·fi ÙÔ Â›Â‰Ô Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈ- 1984;92:564-76.
Û˘. Kurol J, Thilander B. Infraocclusion of primary molars
- ∫Ï›ÛË ÙÔ˘ Û˘ÁÎÏÂÈÛÈ·ÎÔ‡ ÂÈ¤‰Ô˘ ˆ˜ ·ÓÙ›‰Ú·ÛË ÛÙȘ with aplasia of the permanent successor. A
longitudinal study. Angle Orthod 1984;54:283-
ÔÚıÔ‰ÔÓÙÈΤ˜ ‰˘Ó¿ÌÂȘ Ô˘ ·ÛÎÔ‡ÓÙ·È ÛÙÔ ˘·›ÙÈÔ
94.
‰fiÓÙÈ. Kurol J, Olson L. Ankylosis of primary molars, future
periodontal threat to the first permanent molars? Eur
∂ÓË̤ڈÛË ÙÔ˘ ·ÛıÂÓÔ‡˜ J Orthod 1991;13:404-9.
√ ·ÛıÂÓ‹˜ Ú¤ÂÈ Ó· ηٷÓÔ‹ÛÂÈ fiÙÈ Ë ıÂÚ·¢ÙÈ΋ Lamb KA, Reed MW. Measurement of space loss
·ÓÙÈÌÂÙÒÈÛË ÌÔÚ› Ó· ¤¯ÂÈ ˆ˜ ·ÔÙ¤ÏÂÛÌ· ·‰˘Ó·Ì›· resulting from tooth ankylosis. J Dent Child
Ô‰ÔÓÙÈ΋˜ ÌÂٷΛÓËÛ˘ ‹ Ó· ÚÔ·„ÂÈ ·Ó¿ÁÎË ÂÓ‰Ô‰Ô- 1968;35:483-6.
ÓÙÈ΋˜ ıÂÚ·›·˜ ‹ ·ÎfiÌË Î·È ·ÒÏÂÈ· ÙÔ˘ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡. ∏ Lytle JJ. Indications and contraindications for removal of
Û˘Ó·›ÓÂÛË ÙÔ˘ ·ÛıÂÓÔ‡˜ Ú¤ÂÈ Ó· ·ÊÔÚ¿ ÛÙÔ˘˜ ÂÓ·Ï- the impacted tooth. Dent Clin North Am
Ï·ÎÙÈÎÔ‡˜ ÙÚfiÔ˘˜ ·ÓÙÈÌÂÙÒÈÛ˘ ÙˆÓ ¤ÁÎÏÂÈÛÙˆÓ 1979;23:333-46.
‰ÔÓÙÈÒÓ Î·È ÙȘ Û¯ÂÙÈΤ˜ Ì ·˘ÙÔ‡˜ ÂÈÏÔΤ˜ Ô˘ Ù˘¯fiÓ McNamara TG, O’Shea D, McNamara CM, Foley
·ÚÔ˘ÛÈ·ÛÙÔ‡Ó. TF. Case report. The management of traumatic
ankylosis during orthodontics. J Clin Pediatr Dent
2000;24:265-7.
∆È Ú¤ÂÈ Ó· Á›ÓÂÙ·È Î·È ÙÈ Ó· ·ÔʇÁÂÙ·È: Messer LB, Cline JT. Ankylosed primary molars:
- ¢ÂÓ Ú¤ÂÈ Ó· Á›ÓÂÙ·È ÂÍ·ÁˆÁ‹ ÙˆÓ ÚÔÁÔÌÊ›ˆÓ fiÙ·Ó treatment reccomendations from an 8 year long
‰ÂÓ ÁÓˆÚ›˙Ô˘Ì ·Ó Ô Î˘Ófi‰ÔÓÙ·˜ Â›Ó·È ¤ÁÎÏÂÈÛÙÔ˜. study. Pediatr Dent 1980;2:37-47.
- ∞ÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤Ó· ‰fiÓÙÈ· Ô˘ ı· ÌÔÚÔ‡Û·Ó Ó· ÚÔÛʤ- Mueller CT, Gellin ME, Kaplan AL, Bohannan HM.
ÚÔ˘Ó ÛÙ‹ÚÈÍË Î·Ù¿ ÙË ‰È¿ÚÎÂÈ· ÔÚıÔ‰ÔÓÙÈ΋˜ ıÂÚ·- Prevalence of ankylosis of primary molars in
›·˜ ‰ÂÓ Ú¤ÂÈ Ó· ·Ê·ÈÚÔ‡ÓÙ·È. ∂Ó ÙÔ‡ÙÔȘ, Ù· different regions of the United States. ASDC J Dent
‰fiÓÙÈ· ·˘Ù¿ ‰ÂÓ ı· Ú¤ÂÈ Ó· ÚÔηÏÔ‡Ó Û˘ÁÎÏÂÈ- Child 1983;50:213-8.
Ûȷ΋ ‰È·Ù·Ú·¯‹ Î·È Ó· ı¤ÙÔ˘Ó Û ΛӉ˘ÓÔ ÙËÓ Pedersen EK, Hallett BK. Case report. Treatment of
ÔÚ›· Ù˘ ıÂÚ·›·˜. multiple tooth ankylosis with removable prosthesis.
- ™Â ÂÚ›ÙˆÛË ˘Ô‚ÔËıÔ‡ÌÂÓ˘ ·Ó·ÙÔÏ‹˜ ‰ÂÓ Â›Ó·È Pediatr Dent 1994;16:136-8.
Phelan KM, Moss Jr BR, Powell RS, Womble AB.
ÊÚfiÓÈÌÔ Ó· ¯ÚËÛÈÌÔÔÈËı› Û˘ÚÌ¿ÙÈÓË ÚfiÛ‰ÂÛË
Orthodontic management of ankylosed teeth. J Clin
Á‡Úˆ ·fi ÙËÓ ÔÛÙÂ˚ÓÔ-·‰·Ì·ÓÙÈÓÈ΋ ¤ÓˆÛË ÙÔ˘ ‰ÔÓÙÈ-
Orthod 1990;6:375-8.
Ô‡. Pilo R, Littner MM, Marshak B, Aviv I. Case reports.
Severe infraocclusion ankylosis, report of three
cases. J Dent Child 1989;56:144-6.
™YM¶EPA™MATA Proffit W, Fields H, eds. Contemporary orthodontics.
3rd edition,St. Louis: Mosby Inc., 2000:82.
∏ ·Á·ψÛË ÙˆÓ ‰ÔÓÙÈÒÓ ·ÔÙÂÏ› Û˘¯Ófi ·ıÔÏÔÁÈÎfi Rubin PL, Weissman EJ, Bisk F. Experimental tooth
Úfi‚ÏËÌ· ÙˆÓ ÓÂÔÁÈÏÒÓ Î·È ÈÔ Û¿ÓÈ· ÙˆÓ ÌfiÓÈÌˆÓ ankylosis in the monkey. Angle Orthod

E§§HNIKH OP£O¢ONTIKH E¶I£EøPH™H 2003 ñ TOMO™ 6 87 HELLENIC ORTHODONTIC REVIEW 2003 ñ VOLUME 6
A
PEI E§
AI

ET

§A
¢ONTIKH

¢O
¶. ¶ANO™ AÁÎ˘ÏˆÌ¤Ó· ‰fiÓÙÈ·: OÚıÔ‰ÔÓÙÈ΋ ÚÔÛ¤ÁÁÈÛË P. PANOS Tooth ankylosis: Orthodontic implications

™ 1963
£O
OP
‰ÔÓÙÈÒÓ. ∏ ·ÈÙÈÔÏÔÁ›· Ù˘ ηٿÛÙ·Û˘ ·˘Ù‹˜ ‰ÂÓ Â›Ó·È 1984;54:67-72.
ηıÔÚÈṲ̂ÓË. Skolnick IM. Ankylosis of maxillary permanent first
∏ ÎÏÈÓÈ΋ ÂÈÎfiÓ· ÙÔ˘ ÚÔۂ‚ÏË̤ÓÔ˘ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡ ÔÈ- molar. Am J Orthod 1962;49:670-84.
ΛÏÏÂÈ ·fi ¤ÁÎÏÂÈÛË Ì¤¯ÚÈ ·ÙÂÏ‹ Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈÛË ‰È·ÊfiÚÔ˘ Spyropoulos MN. Occlusal disturbances during the
‚·ıÌÔ‡. ∞Ó Ë ·Á·ψÛË ÂÈÛ˘Ì‚Â› Û ÌÂÁ·Ï‡ÙÂÚË ËÏÈ- mixed dentition period. In: Spyropoulos MN, ed.
Λ·, Ë ·ÙÂÏ‹˜ Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈÛË ‰ËÌÈÔ˘ÚÁÂ›Ù·È ÛÙ·‰È·Î¿ Ì Basic Principles in Orthodontics. Volume 2. Beta
‚Ú·‰‡ Ú˘ıÌfi. ∂Ó ÙÔ‡ÙÔȘ, ÚÒÈÌË ·Á·ψÛË Úԉȷ- Medical Arts, 2000:269-73.
Thornton M, Zimmermann ER. Ankylosis of primary
ı¤ÙÂÈ ÁÈ· ÂÌ‚‡ıÈÛË ÙÔ˘ ‰ÔÓÙÈÔ‡. ∞˘Ùfi ÂÌÊ·Ó›˙ÂÙ·È
teeth. J Dent Child 1965;31:120-6.
ÌfiÓÔ Û ÓÂÔÁÈÏ¿ ‰fiÓÙÈ·, Û˘Ó‹ıˆ˜ ÛÙÔ˘˜ ¿Óˆ ÓÂÔÁÈ-
Via WF. Submerged deciduous molars. Familial
ÏÔ‡˜ ÁÔÌÊ›Ô˘˜. tendencies. J Am Dent Assoc 1964;69:128-9.
∏ ‰È¿ÁÓˆÛË Û ‰fiÓÙÈ· Ô˘ ¤¯Ô˘Ó ·Ó·Ù›ÏÂÈ Â›Ó·È Vorhies MJ, Thaddeus G, McDonald ER. Ankylosed
Û˘Ó‹ıˆ˜ ‡ÎÔÏË. µ·Û›˙ÂÙ·È Û ‰ÔÎÈ̷ۛ˜ ÎÈÓËÙÈÎfiÙË- deciduous molars. JADA 1952;44:68-72.
Ù·˜ Î·È Â›ÎÚÔ˘Û˘ ÌÂ Û˘Ó‡·ÚÍË ÎÏÈÓÈÎÒÓ ¯·Ú·ÎÙË- Yilmaz RS, Darling AI, Levers BG. Experimental tooth
ÚÈÛÙÈÎÒÓ ·ÙÂÏÔ‡˜ Û‡ÁÎÏÂÈÛ˘. ∏ ·ÎÙÈÓÔÁÚ·ÊÈ΋ Âͤٷ- ankylosis and horizontal tooth movement in the pig.
ÛË ‰ÂÓ ·ÔηχÙÂÈ ¿ÓÙ· ÙËÓ ÂÚÈÔ¯‹ Ù˘ ·Á·ψ- Archs Oral Biol 1981;26:41-7.
Û˘.
∫·Ù¿ÏÏËÏË ıÂÚ·¢ÙÈ΋ ·ÓÙÈÌÂÙÒÈÛË ÙˆÓ ÓÂÔÁÈÏÒÓ
‰ÔÓÙÈÒÓ Î·È ÚÔÛÂÎÙÈ΋ ·Ú·ÎÔÏÔ‡ıËÛË ‰È·ÛÊ·Ï›- Reprint requests to:
˙Ô˘Ó ÙË Ê˘ÛÈÔÏÔÁÈ΋ ·Ó¿Ù˘ÍË Ù˘ ÌfiÓÈÌ˘ Ô‰ÔÓÙÔ- Mr. Periklis Panos
Ê˘˝·˜. ∏ ·Á·ψÛË ÌfiÓÈÌˆÓ ‰ÔÓÙÈÒÓ ··ÈÙ› ÈÔ ‰Ú·- Department of Orthodontics
ÛÙÈ΋ ıÂÚ·›·. School of Dentistry
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
GR - 54124 Thessaloniki
¢È‡ı˘ÓÛË ÁÈ· ·Ó¿Ù˘·: Greece
∫Ô˜ ¶ÂÚÈÎÏ‹˜ ¶¿ÓÔ˜
ªÂÙ·Ù˘¯È·Îfi˜ ºÔÈÙËÙ‹˜
∂ÚÁ·ÛÙ‹ÚÈÔ √ÚıÔ‰ÔÓÙÈ΋˜
∆Ì‹Ì· √‰ÔÓÙÈ·ÙÚÈ΋˜
∞ÚÈÛÙÔÙ¤ÏÂÈÔ ¶·ÓÂÈÛÙ‹ÌÈÔ £ÂÛÛ·ÏÔӛ΢
54124 £ÂÛÛ·ÏÔÓ›ÎË

E§§HNIKH OP£O¢ONTIKH E¶I£EøPH™H 2003 ñ TOMO™ 6 88 HELLENIC ORTHODONTIC REVIEW 2003 ñ VOLUME 6

You might also like