You are on page 1of 23

College of Arts and Sciences Education

ENGLISH 102 – Course Outline

COURSE INFORMATION
1. Course Number : ENG 102
2. Course Name : Interactive Reading
3. Course Description : This course is designed to provide the students with skillful reading activities in
a formal classroom setting. This curriculum offers various essential reading
techniques along with the wide variety of reading selections. The lessons also
include enabling activities which are expected to enhance the readers’
comprehension skills. These skills in turn become useful tools for the
improvement of the students’ writing capacities.
4. Pre-requisite : ENG 101
5. Co-requisite : None
6. Credit : 6.0 units
7. Class schedule : Not Applicable
8. Program Educational Objectives (PEO):
Three to five years after graduation, the graduates are expected to:
A.
B.
C.
D.

9. Student Outcomes (SO) and their links to PEO


PEO
Upon graduation, the students are expected to:
A B C D
 SO a Ability to function on multidisciplinary teams;
 SO b Understanding of professional and ethical responsibility;
 SO c* Ability to communicate effectively
 SO d* Recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in long-life learning ;and
 SO e Appreciation of Filipino historical and cultural heritage as well as knowledge on
contemporary issues.
Note: * SO being addressed in this course

10. Course Outcomes (CO) and their links to SO


SO
Upon completion of the course, the students are expected to:
a b c d e
 CO 1 Recognize the nature of reading and its strategies; I I E E D

 CO 2 Improve their reading comprehension skills; I I E E D

 CO 3 Imbibe all the values and morals gained from the reading selections; I I E E D

 CO 4 Appreciate the amusement in reading and apply its usefulness in their personal and I I E E D
professional undertakings

Legend: I = Upon attainment of this CO, students will have been introduced to the SO.
E = Upon attainment of this CO, students will have enabled themselves to attain the SO.
D = Upon attainment of this CO, students will have demonstrated partly or fully the SO.

1
College of Arts and Sciences Education
ENGLISH 102 – Course Outline

Program Educational Objectives (PEO)

Vision: A leading institution of higher


learning recognized for its quality
transformative education serving the 1.
nation and the world
UM
Mission: To provide a dynamic and Core
supportive academic environment
through the highest standards of
Values
instruction, research and extension in a
non-sectarian institution committed to
democratizing access to education.

Program Intended Learning Outcomes (PILO) Course Outcomes (CO)

a. Articulate the relationship of education to larger 1. Recognize the nature of reading and its
historical, social, cultural and political processes; strategies;
b. Facilitate learning using a wide range of teaching
methodologies in various types of environment; 2. Improve their reading comprehension skills;
c. Develop alternative teaching approaches for
diverse learners; 3. Imbibe all the values and morals gained
d. Apply skills in curriculum development, lesson from the reading selections;
planning, materials development, instructional
delivery and educational assessment; 4. Appreciate the amusement in reading and
e. Demonstrate basic and higher levels of thinking apply its usefulness in their personal and
skills in planning, assessing and reporting; professional undertakings
f. Practice professional and ethical teaching
standards to respond to the demands of the
community;
g. Pursue life-long learning for personal and
professional growth;
h. Demonstrate in-depth understanding of the
development of elementary/secondary learners;
i. Exhibit comprehensive knowledge of various
learning areas in the elementary/secondary
curriculum;
j. Create and utilize materials appropriate to the
elementary/secondary level to enhance teaching and
learning;
k. Design and implement assessment tools and
procedures to measure elementary/secondary
learning outcomes.

2
College of Arts and Sciences Education
ENGLISH 102 – Course Outline

CO and Assessment task alignment

Assessment Task
CO Theory-based Practice- Assessment Coverage
based Schedule
1. Recognize the nature of Multiple n/a First Exam Overview and
reading and its strategies; Choice Lesson 1
Questions

2. Improve their reading Multiple n/a Second Exam - Lessons 2 - 18


comprehension skills; Choice Seventh Exam
Questions

3. Imbibe all the values and Multiple n/a Second Exam - Lessons 2 - 18
morals gained from the reading Choice Seventh Exam
selections; Questions
4. Appreciate the amusement Multiple n/a Lessons 18 – 21;
in reading and apply its Choice Seventh Exam - Reading
usefulness in their personal and Questions Eighth Exam Enhancement
professional undertakings Activities

*Final assessment will be a comprehensive examination (from first topic to the last) in a Multiple Choice
Questions

Assessment Task Details (Theory-based)

Assessment Coverage Assessment Task Details


Schedule
First Exam Overview and Multiple Choice
Lesson 1 Questions
(100% of the
exam)
Second Lessons 2 - 4 Multiple Choice
Exam Questions
(100% of the
exam)
Third Exam Lessons 5 – 7 Multiple Choice
Questions
(100% of the
exam)

3
College of Arts and Sciences Education
ENGLISH 102 – Course Outline

Fourth Lessons 9 - 10 Multiple Choice


Exam Questions
(100% of the
exam)
Fifth Exam Lessons 11 - 13 Multiple Choice
Questions
(100% of the
exam)
Sixth Exam Lessons 14 - 15 Multiple Choice
Questions
(100% of the
exam)
Seventh Lessons 16 - 18 Multiple Choice
Exam Questions
(100% of the
exam)
Final Exam Lessons 1 - 21 Multiple Choice
Questions
(100% of the
exam)

11. COURSE OUTLINE AND TIME FRAME


TIME
TOPICS FOR FIRST EXAMINATION TLA Required Readings
FRAME
Week 1  Classroom orientation (University 1.

to Policies; SOs, Cos; Core values; and G-  Getting-to-Know


Week 3 Factor) Activity
 Class Orientation  Lecture on
 UM VMG  Student Handbook
 UM Rules & Regulations  Video Clip of
 UM Grading System  the University
 Objectives of the CASE Hymn
 Classroom policies  Lecture- Discussion
 Course outline  Brainstorming
 Grading system  Story Strips

 Preliminaries:
 Nature, Functions and Importance of
Reading

 The Reading Comprehension Levels


 Literal
 Interpretive
 Critical
 Integrative
 Creative

4
College of Arts and Sciences Education
ENGLISH 102 – Course Outline

UNIT 1
Lesson 1: Noting Details
“A Night Spent in the Woods”

TOPICS FOR SECOND EXAMINATION


Week 4  Lesson 2: Following Directions 
to “Go Places with English”
Week 5
 Lesson 3: Getting the Main Idea
“Time in a Bottle”
 Lesson 4: Sequencing
 “The Last Leaf”

TOPICS FOR THIRD EXAMINATION


Week 6 Focus on learning

To

Week 7

Week 8 

to

Week 9

12. TEXTBOOK: Lucas, M. R. & Corpuz, B. (2014). Facilitating Learning: A Metacognitive process

References:

1. Efklides, A. (2014). How does metacognition contribute to the regulation of learning? an integrative
approach. Psychological Topics, 23(1), 1-30.
2. Wilson, N. S., & Bai, H. (2010). The relationships and impact of teachers' Metacognitive knowledge and
pedagogical understandings of metacognition. Metacognition and Learning, 5(3), 269-288.
3. Joseph, N. (2010). Metacognition needed: Teaching middle and high school students to develop strategic
learning skills. Preventing School Failure, 54(2), 99-103.
4. Annan, J., Bowler, J., Mentis, M., & Somerville, M. P. (2011). Between theory and practice falls the shadow:
The learning theories profile. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 10(3), 238-252.

5
College of Arts and Sciences Education
ENGLISH 102 – Course Outline

5. Wang, V. C. X. (2012). Understanding and promoting learning theories. International Forum of Teaching and
Studies, 8(2), 5-11.
6. Botty, H. M. R. H., & Shahrill, M. (2014). The impact of Gagné, Vygotsky and skinner theories in pedagogical
practices of mathematics teachers in Brunei Darussalam. Review of European Studies, 6(4), 100-109.
7. Chiang, M. (2010). How does preservice teachers' learning about learning theories influence their beliefs about
learning?
8. Karagiorgi, Y., & Symeou, L. (2005). Translating constructivism into instructional design: Potential and
limitations. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 8(1).
9. Ivie, S. D. (1998). Ausubel's learning theory: An approach to teaching higher order thinking skills. The High
School Journal, 82 (1), 35.
10. Ahmad, A. R., Seman, A. A., Awang, M. M., & Sulaiman, F. (2015). Application of multiple intelligence theory
to increase student motivation in learning history. Asian Culture and History, 7(1), 210-219.
11. Sengodan, V., & Iksan, Z. H. (2012). Students' learning styles and intrinsic motivation in learning
mathematics. Asian Social Science, 8(16), 17-23.

13. COURSE EVALUATION

Assessment Methods
Weights
EXAMINATIONS
A. Exam 1 – 3 30%
B. Final Exam
- MCQ and Performance-based 30%
CLASS PARTICIPATIONS
C. Quizzes 10%
D. Research 15%
E. Oral recitation 10%
F. Assignments 5%
Total 100%

14. Policies and guidelines


a. Attendance is counted from the first regular class meeting.
b. A validated student identification card must always by worn be all students while attending classes.
c. Cheating is strictly prohibited. Any form of dishonesty shall be dealt with accordingly. Honesty is called for at
all times.
d. Valid examination permits are necessary in taking the examinations as scheduled. CELLULAR PHONES or any
ELECTRONIC GADGETS and PRESCRIBED PRC CALCULATORS are NOT allowed during EXAMINATIONS.
e. Base-20 grading policy should be observed. Students who obtained failing scores in major exams are
recommended to attend the tutorial class.

6
College of Arts and Sciences Education
ENGLISH 102 – Course Outline

Prepared by: Reviewed by:

Pedrito M. Castillo Danilo P. Salomon


Faculty BSED, Program Head

Theresa F. Misola Theresa F. Misola


BEED, Program Head BEED, Program Head

Recommending approval: Approved by:

RUBY A. SERRANO, EdD RONNIE V. AMORADO, PhD


Dean, College of Teacher Education VP, Academic Planning and Services

References reviewed by:

VIRGINIA CAINTIC
AVP – LIC Librarian

7
College of Arts and Sciences Education
ENGLISH 102 – Course Outline

8
College of Arts and Sciences Education
ENGLISH 102 – Course Outline

15. COURSE OUTLINE AND TIME FRAME

TIME TOPICS FOR FIRST EXAMINATION


CO AT TLA
FRAME

Class Orientation 1, 2, 5

Wk ▪ UM VMG Group Dynamics Getting-to-Know


Activity
1 ▪ UM Rules & Regulations

▪ UM Grading System 3, 5
Lecture on
▪ Objectives of the CASE Small Group Discussion
Student Handbook
▪ Classroom policies

▪ Course outline 1, 3,4

▪ Grading system

Preliminaries:

Wk Nature, Functions and Importance of 1 Dyad Activity Video Clip of


Reading
2 the University
Hymn

The Reading Comprehension Levels

9
College of Arts and Sciences Education
ENGLISH 102 – Course Outline

▪ Literal

▪ Interpretive Short Quiz

▪ Critical Lecture- Discussion

▪ Integrative

▪ Creative

Wk UNIT 1 Oral Quiz Brainstorming

3 Lesson 1: Noting Details

“A Night Spent in the Woods”

Story Strips

2, 3 First Examination

(MCQ = 50)

Wk

4 Lesson 2: Following Directions Quiz or Group Dynamics

“Go Places with English” 2, 3 Graded Recitation (using task cards)

Lesson 3: Getting the Main Idea Paint-a-Picture Panel Discussion

“Time in a Bottle”

10
College of Arts and Sciences Education
ENGLISH 102 – Course Outline

Wk 5 2, 3 Writing Activity

Lesson 4: Sequencing

“The Last Leaf” Role Playing

Second Examination

(MCQ = 50)

Lesson 5: Cause and Effect Message Relay

“Learning to Hate Mathematics” 2, 3 Writing Activity

Wk

Wk UNIT 2 Listening Test Dyad for Question


Frames
7 Lesson 6: Paraphrasing 2, 3

“On Measuring Success” Double Entry Journal

Star Burst or
Lesson 7: Summarizing Marathon Quiz
Basic Story Frame
“Stabbed to Change”

11
College of Arts and Sciences Education
ENGLISH 102 – Course Outline

Third Examination

(MCQ = 50)

Lesson 8: Outlining Sentence Jumble Three-Minute Write

Wk 8 “White Lies” 2, 3

K-W-L Chart or

Lesson 9: Denotation & Connotation

“Across the Wide Dark Sea” Venn Diagram

Wk 9 Lesson 10: Doublespeak Reading Comprehension The Problem Tree


Check
“Entropy”

Fourth Examination

(MCQ = 50)

Reading Comprehension
Check
Wk Lesson 11: Figurative Language 2, 3

10 “The Story of King Midas” Crystal Ball or

12
College of Arts and Sciences Education
ENGLISH 102 – Course Outline

Quiz on Fig. Language Story Web

UNIT 3

Wk Lesson 12: Determining Fact from Opinion 2,3,4 Synthesis Journal Round Table
Conference
11 “Who Wants to be an Entrepreneur”

Wk 12 Lesson 13: Fallacies 2,3,4 Synthesis Journal Video Clip with


Seat Work
“I Have a Dream”

Fifth Examination (MCQ


= 50)

Wk 13 2,3,4 Cloze Test Dicto-Comp or

Lesson 14: Identifying Assumptions

“The Stranger” Predicting Task

Lesson 15: Assessing Evidences

Wk “Sensible Living” 2,3,4 Oral Quiz Video Clip on

14 Court Trial

Sixth Examination

13
College of Arts and Sciences Education
ENGLISH 102 – Course Outline

(MCQ = 50)

UNIT 4

Wk Lesson 16: Drawing Insights 2,3,4 Exam Review Quiz Comparison and
Contrast
15 “Finding the Flow”

Personal
Lesson 17: Applying Lessons to Real Life Reflection
“A Letter to Father Carl”

Wk 16 2,3,4 Song Composition Triad

Introduction to: DynEd schedule:

▪ the course *Dialogue

▪ the textbook *Advanced Listening

DynEd training

UNIT 5

Lesson 18: Song Interpretation Seventh Examination

“Go Down, Moses” (MCQ = 50)

14
College of Arts and Sciences Education
ENGLISH 102 – Course Outline

Lesson 19: Poem Writing

Wk “Beyond Forgetting”

17

Poem Interpretation Haiku Writing


(using rubrics)

Lesson 20: Preparing Advertisements

“A Selection of Advertisements” 2,3,4 Informal Debate

Exam Review Quiz


Lesson 21: Continuing and Altering a Story

“A Doubtful Christmas” Collage

Wk 18 Reading Enhancement Activities 1,2,3,4 Exam Review Quiz

Outlining of
Study Guide
Final Examination

(MCQ = 100)

10) Textbook:

➢ Gabelo, Nerissa et al (2014). Skillful Reading. Malabon: Manila.

Mutya Publishing House, Inc.

15
College of Arts and Sciences Education
ENGLISH 102 – Course Outline

11) References:

♣ Langan, John (2014). Sentence Skills with Readings. New York, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill
Companies, Inc.

♣ Barrot, Jessie (2013). Reading to Think, Thinking to Write: A Guide to Critical Reading
and Writing. Manila, Phil.: Rex Book Store.

♣ Wyrick, Jean (2011). Steps to Writing well with Additional Readings. Australia:
Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

♣ Langan, John (2011). College Writing Skills with Readings. New York: McGraw-Hill.

♣ Fawcett, Susan (2011). Evergreen: A Guide to Writing with Readings. Australia:


Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

12) Policies and guidelines

a. Attendance is counted from the first regular class meeting to monitor the number of absences
not to exceed 20% of the total contact hours as provided in the Student Handbook Section 2.2.7
letters A-B.

b. A validated student identification card must always by worn by all students while attending
classes.

c. Cheating is strictly prohibited as provided in section 7.3.2 letter H in Student Handbook. Any
form of dishonesty shall be dealt with accordingly. Honesty is called for at all times.

d. Valid examination permits are necessary in taking the examinations as scheduled.

e. CELLULAR PHONES or any ELECTRONIC GADGETS are NOT allowed during EXAMINATIONS.

f. Once examination has started, NOBODY is allowed to take his/her personal necessities.

g. Base-15 grading policy should be observed. Students who obtained failing scores in major
exams are given appropriate/ necessary interventions as cited in the monitoring form. Tutorial
classes will be offered upon the approval from the administration.

h. One textbook-one student policy.

i. Proper decorum must be observed at all times during class hour.

16
College of Arts and Sciences Education
ENGLISH 102 – Course Outline

j. Everyone is responsible in picking up and arranging the chairs before and after class hour

Prepared by: Reviewed by:

EDWIN L. NEBRIA

References reviewed by: Chair, Language Discipline

ROEL J. IDO

JOCELYN L. NOVELOZO, M.E.L.T VIRGINIA I. CAINTIC

AVP-LIC

Noted by:

KHRISTINE MARIE D. CONCEPCION, Ph. D.

Dean, College of Arts and Sciences

Approved by:

RONNIE V. AMORADO, Ph. D.

VP, Academic Planning and Services

17
College of Arts and Sciences Education
ENGLISH 102 – Course Outline

18
College of Arts and Sciences Education
ENGLISH 102 – Course Outline

16. COURSE OUTLINE AND TIME FRAME


TIME
TOPICS FOR FIRST EXAMINATION TLA Required Readings
FRAME
Week 1 Class Orientation  Getting-to-Know 2. Efklides, A. (2014). How does
metacognition contribute to the
to Activity regulation of learning? an
Week 3  UM VMG  Lecture on Student integrative
 UM Rules & Regulations Handbook
approach. Psychological
Topics, 23(1), 1-30.
 UM Grading System  Video Clip of the 3. Wilson, N. S., & Bai, H. (2010).
 Objectives of the CASE University The relationships and impact of
teachers' metacognitive
 Classroom policies
knowledge and pedagogical
 Course outline understandings of
 Grading system metacognition. Metacognition and
Learning, 5(3), 269-288.
Preliminaries: 4. Joseph, N. (2010). Metacognition
Nature, Functions and Importance of needed: Teaching middle and high
Reading school students to develop
strategic learning skills.
Preventing School Failure, 54(2),
The Reading Comprehension Levels 99-103.
▪ Literal
▪ Interpretive
▪ Critical
▪ Integrative
▪ Creative
UNIT 1

 Lesson 1: Noting Details


“A Night Spent in the Woods”

TOPICS FOR SECOND EXAMINATION

19
College of Arts and Sciences Education
ENGLISH 102 – Course Outline

Week 4 Focus on the learner  Group dynamics 1. Annan, J., Bowler, J., Mentis, M., &
Somerville, M. P. (2011). Between
to  Module 3: Review of theories related to  Concept mapping theory and practice falls the shadow:
Week 5 the learners’ development  Oral presentation The learning theories profile. Journal
 Module 4: Individual Differences of Cognitive Education and
 Writeshop on Psychology, 10(3), 238-252.
 Module 5: Learning/thinking styles and
lesson plan making 2. Wang, V. C. X. (2012).
multiple intelligences
 Research article Understanding and promoting
 Module 6: Learners with exceptionalities learning theories. International
reading/discourse
Forum of Teaching and Studies, 8(2),
 Oral recitation 5-11.
3. Botty, H. M. R. H., & Shahrill, M.
(2014). The impact of gagné,
vygotsky and skinner theories in
pedagogical practices of mathematics
teachers in brunei arussalam. Review
of European Studies, 6(4), 100-109.
TOPICS FOR THIRD EXAMINATION
Week 6 Focus on learning  Group dynamics 1. Chiang, M. (2010). How does
preservice teachers' learning about
 Module 7: Behaviorism  Concept mapping learning theories influence their
To  Module 8: Neo-behaviorism  Oral presentation beliefs about learning?
 Module 9: Gestalt psychology
 Classroom
Week 7  Module 10: Information processing 2. Karagiorgi, Y., & Symeou, L.
simulation analysis (2005). Translating constructivism
 Module 11: Gagne’s conditions of
 Research article into instructional design: Potential
learning and limitations. Journal of
reading/discourse
 Module 12: Ausubel’s subsumption Educational Technology &
 Oral recitation
theory Society, 8(1).

 Module 13: Bruner’s constructivist


3. Ivie, S. D. (1998). Ausubel's
theory learning theory: An approach to
 Module 14: Constructivism teaching higher order thinking
 Module 15: Transfer of learning skills. The High School Journal,82(1),
35.
 Module 16: Bloom’s taxonomy
 Module 17: Sternberg’s successful
intelligence
 Module 18: Problem solving and
creativity
Week 8  Module 19: Meaning and types of  Group dynamics 1. Ahmad, A. R., Seman, A. A.,
motivation  Oral presentation Awang, M. M., & Sulaiman, F.
to  Module 20: Theories and factors (2015). Application of multiple
 Research article intelligence theory to increase
affecting motivation reading/discourse student motivation in learning
Week 9  Module 21: Students’ diversity in  Oral recitation history. Asian Culture and
motivation
History, 7(1), 210-219.
 Module 22: Human environmental
factors affecting motivation 2. Sengodan, V., & Iksan, Z. H.
 Module 23: The classroom climate (2012). Students' learning styles
 Module 24: The physical learning and intrinsic motivation in
environment learning mathematics. Asian
 Module 25: Assessment strategies that Social Science, 8(16), 17-23.
can increase motivation
 Module 26: Integration (coherence of all
topics)

17. TEXTBOOK: Lucas, M. R. & Corpuz, B. (2014). Facilitating Learning: A Metacognitive process

20
College of Arts and Sciences Education
ENGLISH 102 – Course Outline

References:

1. Efklides, A. (2014). How does metacognition contribute to the regulation of learning? an integrative
approach. Psychological Topics, 23(1), 1-30.
2. Wilson, N. S., & Bai, H. (2010). The relationships and impact of teachers' Metacognitive knowledge and
pedagogical understandings of metacognition. Metacognition and Learning, 5(3), 269-288.
3. Joseph, N. (2010). Metacognition needed: Teaching middle and high school students to develop strategic
learning skills. Preventing School Failure, 54(2), 99-103.
4. Annan, J., Bowler, J., Mentis, M., & Somerville, M. P. (2011). Between theory and practice falls the shadow:
The learning theories profile. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 10(3), 238-252.
5. Wang, V. C. X. (2012). Understanding and promoting learning theories. International Forum of Teaching and
Studies, 8(2), 5-11.
6. Botty, H. M. R. H., & Shahrill, M. (2014). The impact of Gagné, Vygotsky and skinner theories in pedagogical
practices of mathematics teachers in Brunei Darussalam. Review of European Studies, 6(4), 100-109.
7. Chiang, M. (2010). How does preservice teachers' learning about learning theories influence their beliefs about
learning?
8. Karagiorgi, Y., & Symeou, L. (2005). Translating constructivism into instructional design: Potential and
limitations. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 8(1).
9. Ivie, S. D. (1998). Ausubel's learning theory: An approach to teaching higher order thinking skills. The High
School Journal, 82 (1), 35.
10. Ahmad, A. R., Seman, A. A., Awang, M. M., & Sulaiman, F. (2015). Application of multiple intelligence theory
to increase student motivation in learning history. Asian Culture and History, 7(1), 210-219.
11. Sengodan, V., & Iksan, Z. H. (2012). Students' learning styles and intrinsic motivation in learning
mathematics. Asian Social Science, 8(16), 17-23.

18. COURSE EVALUATION

Assessment Methods
Weights
EXAMINATIONS
A. Exam 1 – 3 30%
B. Final Exam
- MCQ and Performance-based 30%
CLASS PARTICIPATIONS
C. Quizzes 10%
D. Research 15%
E. Oral recitation 10%
F. Assignments 5%
Total 100%

19. Policies and guidelines

21
College of Arts and Sciences Education
ENGLISH 102 – Course Outline

f. Attendance is counted from the first regular class meeting.


g. A validated student identification card must always by worn be all students while attending classes.
h. Cheating is strictly prohibited. Any form of dishonesty shall be dealt with accordingly. Honesty is called for at
all times.
i. Valid examination permits are necessary in taking the examinations as scheduled. CELLULAR PHONES or any
ELECTRONIC GADGETS and PRESCRIBED PRC CALCULATORS are NOT allowed during EXAMINATIONS.
j. Base-20 grading policy should be observed. Students who obtained failing scores in major exams are
recommended to attend the tutorial class.

Prepared by: Reviewed by:

Pedrito M. Castillo Danilo P. Salomon


Faculty BSED, Program Head

Theresa F. Misola Theresa F. Misola


BEED, Program Head BEED, Program Head

Recommending approval: Approved by:

RUBY A. SERRANO, EdD RONNIE V. AMORADO, PhD


Dean, College of Teacher Education VP, Academic Planning and Services

References reviewed by:

VIRGINIA CAINTIC
AVP – LIC Librarian

22
College of Arts and Sciences Education
ENGLISH 102 – Course Outline

23

You might also like