10/14/2019 Cantilever Retaining Wall Design

iitg.ac.in/amurali/CWdesign/design.php?step=9 1/6
10/14/2019 Cantilever Retaining Wall Design

Results

Known Parameters :

Height of earth Retained, h = 6.5 m

Unit weight of soil = 18 kN/m2
Unit weight of concrete = 25 kN/m2
angle of internal friction of soil, φ = 30°
Slope of backfill, β = 0°
soil-wall interface friction, δ = 30°
Surcharge pressure on backfill, ws = 10 kN/m2

Wall Dimensions :

Assumed depth of foundation, d = m

Total height of the wall, H = m
Safe Bearing Capacity of soil = kN/m2

Thickness of base slab, t = mm

Thickness of stem at base = mm
Thickness of stem at top = mm
Length of heel slab including stem thickness = m
Length of toe slab = m front of the wall
Total length of base slab = m
Calculated wall sloping on the back of the wall (with the vertical) = °

iitg.ac.in/amurali/CWdesign/design.php?step=9 2/6
10/14/2019 Cantilever Retaining Wall Design

Earth Pressure analysis :

Lateral Earth Pressure Coefficients

Coefficient Coulomb's Rankine's

Active 0.327 0.333

Passive 3 3

Lateral Earth pressure due to backfill soil, Pa =180.007 kN

@ 2.583 m from bottom of heel slab.
Lateral Earth pressure due to surcharge, Ps =25.808 kN
@ 3.875 m from bottom of heel slab.
Resultant pressures at the base and moment of forces about the bottom of the heel.
weight and moment calculations

Force
distance form heel (m) Moment (kNm)
(kN)

Wall 201.844 3.74 754.036

Soil 553.273 2.02 1119.313

vertical earth
0 0 0
pressure

Total 755.117 1873.349

Stability against overturning :

Overturning moment, Mo =
Net moment due to lateral earth pressure about heel = 564.964 kNm
Distance of resultant vertical force from heel = 2.481 m
Stablizing moment (about Toe), Mr = 3223.594 kNm

 Factor of safety against overturning, FSoverturning = 5.14

Soil Pressure at footing base :

eccentricity of vertical reaction from CG of footing, e = -0.15 m

 resultant Pressure is acting within middle one-third of footing, so no tension in soil.

 Maximum Pressure on soil at the base 96.953 kN/m2 is less than safe bearing capacity
of soil 100 kN/m2
 Minimum Pressure on soil at the base = 126.785 kN/m2. So, no tension at base

iitg.ac.in/amurali/CWdesign/design.php?step=9 3/6
10/14/2019 Cantilever Retaining Wall Design

Check for Sliding stability:

Frictional Resistance, F = 435.967 kN

Sliding force, Fr = 205.815 kN

 Factor of safety against sliding, FSsliding = 1.91

iitg.ac.in/amurali/CWdesign/design.php?step=9 4/6
10/14/2019 Cantilever Retaining Wall Design

Reinforcement Design :

Reinforcement design calculations

Toe Heel Stem

Effective thickness, (mm) 644 644 644

Design shear force, (kN/m) 203.383 205.271 216.479

Nominal Shear stress, (MPa) 0.316 0.32 0.34

Design Moment, (kNm/m) 314.262 359.7 649.21

Required % of steel for shear 0.21 0.25 0.25

Required % of steel for flexure 0.22 0.25 0.48

Area of steel required, (mm2/m) 1416.8 1610 3091.2

Maximum spacing allowed, (mm) 80 70 37

Toe Slab :

Provide φ bars @ c/c at the bottom of the toe slab.

The bars should extend by at least a distance Ld = mm beyond the front face of the stem,
on both sides.
Also provide 10 φ bars @ c/c as temperature and shrinkage reinforcement.

Heel Slab :

Provide φ bars @ c/c at the top of the heel slab.

The bars should extend by at least a distance Ld = mm beyond the rear face of the stem,
on both sides.
Also provide 10 φ bars @ c/c as temperature and shrinkage reinforcement.

Stem reinforcement:

Provide φ bars @ c/c at the rear face of the stem.

The bars should extend by at least a distance Ld = mm beyond the base of the stem.
The distance of the shear-key (if provided) may be adjusted so that the stem
reinforcements can be extended into the shear-key. The depth of shear key may be
increased to maintain passive resistance during this adjustment
Also provide 10 φ bars @ c/c as temperature and shrinkage reinforcement in the lower
half of the stem,

iitg.ac.in/amurali/CWdesign/design.php?step=9 5/6
10/14/2019 Cantilever Retaining Wall Design

and 10 φ bars @ c/c as temperature and shrinkage reinforcement in the upper half of the
stem.

iitg.ac.in/amurali/CWdesign/design.php?step=9 6/6