GGN DD 013

DESIGN REPORT – MAJOR BRIDGE 147+533 Jan 2019
Detailed Engineering in Connection with Rehabilitation and Up-Gradation to Four Laning of NH-31 D from Km. 113+200 to km. 154+854
(Package-2-A) of Ghoshpukur - Salsalabari section in the State of West Bengal on EPC mode
DETAILED ENGINEERING IN CONNECTION WITH REHABILITATION AND

UP-GRADATION TO FOUR LANING OF NH-31 D FROM KM. 113+200 TO KM.
154+854 (PACKAGE-2-A) OF GHOSHPUKUR - SALSALABARI SECTION IN
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL ON EPC MODE
CLIENT: NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA (NHAI)
CONTRACTOR: SIMPLEX INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.
DESIGN REPORT – MAJOR BRIDGE 123+518.5
Document Title Design Report – Major Bridge 123+518.5

Project no. 4800197
Document No. 4800197-GGN-DD-013
Version No. D0
Date of submission 29.11.2019
Designer Akshit
Checker Siddhartha
SUMMARY OF REVISIONS
Approved By
Description of
Rev Date
modification/revision
Name/Position Signature
D. Ray
D0 29.11.2019 For review
Design Director
NMDC–RLIANCE–RIZZANI JV
Detailed Engineering Consultancy Services for Rehabiliation and
Upgradation by Four-Laning of NH-31D from KM 113.20 to KM
154.854 (Package-II A) Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the state of
West Bengal
Pier-P5 for Major Bridge at chainage - 123+518.5

(This design is applicable for Pier P3, P4 also)
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile
Content
1 Input, Load Calculations, Design forces
2 Pier Section Design
3 Pile Base Pressure Check
4 Pile SLS check
5 Pile ULS Check
6 Pile Structural Desgin
Annex _I Confinement RF
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile
LOUIS BERGER Document no.
4800197-GGN-
Detailed Engineering Consultancy Services for Rehabiliation and Upgradation by Four-Laning of NH-31D from KM
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
113.20 to KM 154.854 (Package-II A) Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the state of West Bengal
Date
Designed by: Checked by
Design of Pier P5 for Ch: 123+518.5 29-11-2019
Akshit S.Chatterjee
1 Inputs:
16.00 Traffic
Direction
FRL 0.00%
+67.354
45.69m span 45.69 m span
2.40 4.1m
Top of pier 0.75

+64.504
cap
6.4m
6.979
GL 57.70
56.78
3.17
2.25
54.53
Finished Road Level (FRL) at the centre of Pier = 67.354 m
Pile cap bottom level / Founding level = 54.53 m
Max depth of scour For Pier from FSL (Ref: ANNEXURE-I)

= 10.46 m
Super Structure
Overall Length Span 1 = 45.69 m

Width of Deck Slab - Span 1 = 16.00 m
Super structure Depth = 2.40 m
Crash barrier Height = 1.00 m
Wearing Coat thickness = 0.1 m
Effective Length of span 1 = 43.29 m

Sub Structure
Depth of Bearing + Pedestal = 0.35 m
Pier Cap Top Level = +64.504 m =+67.354-0.1-2.40-0.35 - cross slope
Pier cap - Length along the Traffic = 4.1 m
Pier cap - Length across the Traffic = 12.9 m
Pier cap - Overall Depth = 0.75 m
Centre to centre of bearing (Transverse) = 4.10 m
Centre to centre of bearing (Longitudinal) = 2.40 m
Height of sloping portion of piercap = 0.75 m
Existing GL = 57.70 m
Height of Pier from top of Pile Cap = 7.73 m =+64.504-56.775
Height of Pier below GL = 0.92 m
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
Design height of pier = 7.80 m
Dimension of Pier along traffic = 1.80 m
Dimension of Pier across traffic = 6.40 m LWL (RL) = +57.70
Scour level HFL = +50.69 m Scour level HFL-S = 51.73
HFL (RL) = +61.15 m Scour level LWL-S = 52.78
Max depth of scour = 10.46 m from HFL
Foundation
Pile - Diameter = 1.5 m Type of Foundation = PILE
No of Pile = 9.0 Nos
Pile cap/Footing -Along Traffic Direction = 10.8 m
Pile cap /Footing -Across Traffic Direction = 11.4 m
Pile cap - Depth = 2.3 m Footing depth at tip = 2.25 m
Min Thickness of soil above pile cap = 0.9 m offset from pier = 0 mm
Materials Modulur ratio = 10
Unit weight of PSC = 25 kN/m3
Unit weight of RCC = 25 kN/m3
Unit weight of Wearing course = 22 kN/m3
Unit weight of Soil fill = 20 kN/m3
Grade of Concrete for Pier = 35 N/mm²
Grade of Concrete for Piles (or Open Foundation) = 35 N/mm²
Grade of Steel used = 550 N/mm²
Load Calculation
1.1 Dead Load
1.1.1 SuperStructure
Load from Span 1
Total Weight = (360.2)×25.0 DL Extra Factor 1.05
Reaction on Bearing(Outer bearing) = 6338 kN
Load from Span 2

Total Weight = =(360.2)×25.0
Reaction on Bearing(Inner bearing) = 6338 kN
Total reaction on pier from two spans 12676 kN

=
ML due to different spans 0 kN-m
=
Transverse moment = 0 kN-m
Total SIDL
Reaction (Outer Bearing) = 1268 kN
Reaction (Inner Bearing) = 1268 kN
Total reaction = 2536 kN
Fixed SIDL ( crash barrier+services)

Reaction ( outer bearing ) = 514.0 kN
Reaction (Inner bearing) = 514.0 kN
Long. Moment due to diff. Spans = 0.0 kN-m
Transverse Moment = 0.0 kN-m
Variable SIDL(Wearing coat+future overlay)

Reaction (Outer bearing) = 753.9 kN
Reaction (Inner Bearing ) = 753.9 kN
Total reaction due to SIDL(Wearing coat) = 1508 kN
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
1.2 Live Load
1.2.1 Governing Load cases for Live Load
Case 1 (Maximum Axial Force case) Without any reduction factor

Axial force = 2520 kN
Longitudinal Moment = 1162 kNm
Transverse Moment = 2395 kNm
Case 2 (Maximum Longitudinal Moment case)-

Case 3 (Maximum Transverse Moment case)

1.3 Longitudinal Forces (Braking Force & Friction Force)
1.3.1 70R
Braking Force
No.of vehicles on span = 1 nos.

Total Live load of 1L 70R = 1000 kN 1L Class A 554 kN
For Contribution of B.F = 20% of First Train + 10% of Second train
Contribution of B.F (Fh) (In Normal case) = 318 kN Contribution of B.F (Fh) (In Trans Seis case)
Contribution of B.F (Fh) (Max Possible in Long Seis case) = 0 kN 64 kN
Friction Force
Left side Right side
S.No Description \ Type of Pier P1 P2 P3 P4

Fx Free
1 DL Rxn on free end (input value) 6338 6338 0 Put Max R only for EJ or FR pier.
2 SIDL on free end (input value) 1268 1268 0
Coefficient of Friction 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
Frictional force due to DL + SIDL 380 380 0 0
3 LL Reaction Without any reduction factor 2520 2520 0 0

Frictional force due to LL 126 126 0 0
Live Load Lane reduction factor to be
taken = 1.0 LL factor on Seismic = 0.2
Normal Case Trans Seismic Case
Fixed Bearing max of:
Fh-u(Rg+Rq) -189 kN -342 kN
Fh/2+u(Rg+Rq) 665 kN 437.256765 kN
Free bearing
u(Rg+Rq) 506 kN 405
Total Horizontal force normal 1171 kN
Design Longitudinal Force

= 1171 kN 843 kN
(B.F & F.F) - Service
Design Longitudinal Force - seismic = 0 kN DesignTransverse Force - seismic
Design Longitudinal Force - seismic
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
1.4 Seismic force
Calculation of Seismic coefficients
 Z   Sa 
   g 
 2   
Ah 
 R 
 
 I 
Importance factor , I = 1.20
Zone Factor, Z (for Zone II) = 0.36
Response reduction factor, R Long- direction = 3.00
Response reduction factor, R Trans - direction = 3.00
Fundamental natural period
D
T 2 (Annexure D , IRC:6-2017)
1000 F
D= Appropriate dead load of the superstructure and live load in kN
F = Horizontal force in kN required to be applied at the centre of mass of the superstructure for one mm
horizontal deflection at the top of the pier for the earthquake in the transverse direction
and the force to be applied at the top of the bearings for the earthquake in the longitudinal direction
1.4.1 Calculation of Stiffness
Pier
Dimension of Pier - Longitudinal direction = 1.80 m
Dimension of Pier - Transverse direction = 6.40 m
Pier - design height = 7.80 m
Height of the C.G of Superstructure from soffit (DL+SIDL) (h) = 1.38 m
Grade of concrete = M 35
4
M.I in longitudinal direction IL (0.75 Cracked MOI) = 2.333 m =(6.40×1.80^3)/12
4
M.I in transverse direction IT (0.75 Cracked MOI) = 29.491 m =(1.80×6.40^3)/12
Modulus of elasticity of concrete E = 32000 N/mm2 (IRC:112-2011 Table 6.5)
Stiffness in trans direction K1T = 3EI/H3
=6×32000×1000×29.491/((8.15^2)×((3×(1.38))+(2
= 3270004 kN/m
×8.15)))
Stiffness - Longitudinal (3EIL/L3) K1L = 413691 kN/m =3×32000×1000×2.333/(8.15)^3

Height taken for the calculation (H) upto bearing top = 8.15 m
(H of shortest pier in the group)
Piles
Pile - Diameter = 1.50 m
Pile - Length ( L1+Lf) = 13.4 m
Number of pile per pier location "n" = 9 Nos.

4
Moment of inertia of one pile (I) = 0.2485 m =(3.142×(1.50)^4)/64
Young's modulus of elasticity of concrete E
(IRC:112-2011 Table 6.5)
= 32000 N/mm2
Stiffness of one pile k= 12EI / L3 = 39312 kN/m =(12×32000×1000×0.2485/(13.44)^3)
Stiffness of pile group = nk = 353808 kN/m =9×39312
Stiffness in trans direction K2T = 353808 kN/m
Stiffness in Long direction K2L = 353808 kN/m
Total Stiffness
Stiffness " k " = 1/(1/k1+1/k2)
Stiffness in Longitudinal direction "KL" = =1/(1/413691+1/353808)
= 190707 kN/m
= 190.71 kN/mm 413.6908483
Stiffness in transverse direction "KT" = 1/(1/3270004+1/353808)
= 319264 kN/m
= 319.26 kN/mm 3270.003886
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
1.4.2 Calculation of Seismic coefficient in the Longitudinal direction
S.No Description DL SIDL

1 Left bearing 6338 1268
2 Right Bearing 6338 1268
3 Free Pier 0 0
4 Right EJ Pier 0 0
Sub total 12676 2536
Total Load 15212 kN (=12676+2536)
D = 15212 kN
T = 0.384 (eq-1)
Sa/g = 2.500 2.50 for square pier link with this
= 2.500 for wall type pier full Sa/g considered
Horizontal accelaration longitudinal " AhL " = (Sa/g)*(Z/2)/(R/I)
= 0.180 =(0.36/2)×(2.500)/(3.00/1.20)
Vertical acceleration " Av " = 0.120 as per clause 219.3 of IRC:6-2017
1.4.3 Calculation of Seismic coefficient in the Transverse direction
S.No Description Load (kN) Remark
1 Dead Load 12676 1.1

2 SIDL 2536 1.1.2
3 Live Load 504 Refer 1.2.1
5 Pier(50%) 0
Total Seismic load (D) 15716
T = 0.139 (eq-1)
Sa/g = 2.500
Horizontal acceleration Transverse " AhT " = (Sa/g)*(Z/2)/(R/I)
= 0.180 (=(0.36/2)×2.500/(3.00/1.20))
1.5 Centrifugal force

C = (WV2)/(127R)
Max Reaction case load = 2520 kN
Max Longitudinal case load = 1808 kN
Max transverse case load = 1628 kN
Design Speed " V " = 0.00 km/hr
Radius of curve " R " = 460 m
Centrifugal force
C.F -max reaction = 0 kN =2520×0×0/(127x460)
C.F-max longitudinal case = 0 kN =1808×0×0/(127x460)
C.F-max transverse case = 0 kN =1628×0×0/(127x460)
1.6 Wind Load

Ht. of Parapet (From C/S) = 1.00 m
Ht. of parapet from GL = 10.63
For height of 10.63m as per IRC:6-2017, Table:4 wind pressure is as below,
Table:4 wind pressure is for basic wind speed 33m/s

Assume Terrain without Obstructions
Wind speed in Delhi location = 36 m/s

(As per IS:875-Part3)
H (m) Pressure
At vehicle top 12.63 582
At parapet top 10.63 559
At girder bot. 7.23 552
2
Avg. Wind pressure (Pz) = 777.60 N/m
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
I) For Superstructure (as per Cl.209.3.3 of IRC:6-2017)
Gust Factor (G) for spans upto 150m = 2.0

Drag Coefficient (CD) = 2(1+c/20d) 2.210344828 = 1.3
Where, c= c/c distance of adjacent girders & d=depth of windward girder
2
Exposed area of superstructure (A1) 45.69 155.346 = 155 m
Transverse wind load (FT) = Pz x A1 x G x CD
= 314 kN
Longitudinal wind load (FL) = 79 kN
Width of Superstructure = 16.0 m

2
Plan Area (A3) 731.04 = 731 m
Lift Coefficient (CL) = 0.75
Vertical wind load (FV) = Pz x A3 x G x CL
(-ve sign indicates upward direction of wind force) = -853 kN

CG of wind load on Superstructure above bearing = 1.70 m
II) For Live load (as per Cl.209.3.3 of IRC:6-2017)
Gust Factor (G) = 2.0

Drag Coefficient (CD) = 1.95
Height of Vehicle = 3.0 m
Exposed ht. of vehicle = 2.00 m
For a height of 12.63m

2
a) Max. Reaction case
Length of car on span 1 45.69 = 22.8 m

2
Exposed area of Vehicle = 91.4 m
Transverse wind load (FT) = 277 kN
Longitudinal wind load (FL) = 69.3 kN
b) Max. long. moment case
Length of car on span 1 = 46 m

2
c) Max. trans. moment case

2
Exposed area of Vehicle 54.828 = 91.4 m
CG of wind load due to Live load above bearing = 4.35 m
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
III) For Substructure (as per Cl.209.4 of IRC:6-2017)
Height of pier (Piercap top to GL) h = 6.880 m
Dim. Parallel to wind d = 1.8 m
Dim. Perpendicular to wind b = 6.40 m
h/b = 1.08
d/b = 0.281
2
Exposed area of substructure (A1) = 14 m
2
Wind pressure (Pz) = 777.6 N/m
Transverse wind load (FT) Pz x A1 x G x CD = 48 kN
h/b = 3.82
d/b = 3.556
Drag Coefficient (CD) 1.482222222 = 1.14
2
Exposed area of substructure (A1) = 84.6 m
2
1.9 Horizontal Force due to Water Current:

Average velocity of flow (Ref:Annexure-v) V = 3 m/sec
Lowest Bed level (As per hydrologycal data) = 57.695 m

say = 57.695 m
High Flood level = 61.15 m
Height of the pier exposed to water pressure - HFL condition = 4.37

Height of the pier exposed to water pressure - LWL condition = 0.92
Component of maximum velocity in lateral direction =(2)^0.5×3 = 4.24 m/sec
Width of the pier perpendicular to the direction of water flow = 1.80 m
Width of the Pile cap perpendicular to the direction of water flow = 10.80 m
Width of the pier parellal to the direction of water flow = 6.40 m
Width of the Pile cap parellal to the direction of water flow = 11.40 m
Intensity of pressure due to water P = 52KV2

Constant K depends on the shape - For pier & footings K = 0.66
Intensity of pressure =52×0.66×4.24^2 = 617.8 kg/m2
=617.76×9.81/1000 = 6.1 kN/m2
Variation of force due to water current over pier
Variation of velocity with depth (at HFL -S) (at HFL -N)
(at HFL) 6.06 6.06 kN/m2
HFL
10.5 4.37
3.25 3.53 kN/m2 Pier bottom
1.80 9.41 2.22 kN/m2 Pile bottom
SCOUR LEVEL
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
Lateral
Resolved Pressure intensities at Cos q Calculation Trans force Sin q Calculation Long. force
intensity
HFL 6.1 0.940 =6.1×0.940 5.69 0.342 =6.1×0.342 2.07

Bottom of pier level 3.5 0.940 =3.5×0.940 3.32 0.342 =3.5×0.342 1.21
Bottom of footing level 2.2 0.940 =2.2×0.940 2.09 0.342 =2.2×0.342 0.76
Transverse Forces & Moments:

Force Transverse Moment at
Direction Component transverse
HT Lever arm Pier bottom Lever arm Pile Bottom
on pier 35.44 2.377 84.246 - -

Transverse
on pile cap 65.69 - - 1.210 243.46
1.209969789
Longitudinal Forces & Moments:

Longitudinal Moment at
Force long
Direction Component
HL Lever arm Pier bottom Lever arm Pile Bottom
on pier 45.86 2.3773 109.025 - -

Longitudinal
on pile cap 25.24 - - 1.21 242.75
1.209969789
HFL - SEISMIC CASE

degree to20
be considered
Lateral
intensity
HFL 6.1 0.940 =6.1×0.940 5.69 0.342 =6.1×0.342 2.07

on pier 34.40 2.405 82.732 - -
Transverse
on pier cap 57.61 - - 1.233 231.14
1.232648635
Force long Longitudinal Moment at

Direction Component
on pier 44.51 2.405 107.065 - -
Longitudinal
on pier cap 22.13 - - 1.23 234.50
1.232648635
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
1.10 Buoyancy : HFL
Upto pier level Volume of water displaced 50.3 m^3

Weight to be deducted 503.4 kN
Upto pile cap Volume of water displaced 277.0 m^3

bottom / fdn
Buoyancy : LWL
Volume of water displaced 10.6 m^3

Upto pier level

bottom
1.51 Summary of Loads at the Top of Pier cap
P Horizontal Force (kN) Lever arm (m) Moment (kN-m)

S.No Description of Load
(kN) HT HL eT eL MT ML
1 D.L (Superstructure ) 12676 0 0 0 0 0 0
D.S.S 0
2 S.I.D.L- Fixed 1028 0 0 0 0 0 0
S.I.D.L- variable 1508 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Live Load
L.L (Case 1-Max P) 2520 0 0 0.00 0.00 2395 1162
L.L (Case 2-Max ML) 1808 0 0 0.00 0.00 1718 2169
L.L (Case 3 - Max MT) 1628 0 0 0.00 0.00 6358 1170
4 Longitudinal Forces (additional vertical force is neglected)
4.1 Normal Condition 0 0 1171 0 0.35 0 410
4.2 During Seismic Condition 0 0 0 0 0.35 0 0
5.1 Seismic Force (Transverse)
5.1.1 Superstructure (DL) -1521 2282 0 1.38 0 3151 0
5.1.2 Superstructure (SIDL) -304 456 0 2.80 0 1278 0
5.1.3 Superstructure (LL)
L.L (-Max P) -60 91 0 4.050 0 367 0
L.L ( Max ML) -43 65 0 4.050 0 264 0
L.L (- Max MT) -39 59 0 4.050 0 237 0
5.1.4 Substructure
5.2 Seismic Force (Longitudinal)
5.2.1 Superstructure (DL) -1521 0 2282 0 0.35 0 799
5.2.2 Superstructure (SIDL) -304 0 456 0 0.35 0 160
5.2.3 Substructure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 Centrifugal Force
Max P 0 0 0 4.05 0 0 0
Max ML 0 0 0 4.05 0 0 0
Max MT 0 0 0 4.05 0 0 0
7 Wind Load
On superstructure -853 314 79 2.05 2.05 644 161
Live load max reaction case 0 277 69 4.35 4.35 1205 301
Live load max longitudinal case 0 0 0 4.35 4.35 0 0
Live load max Transverse case 0 277 69 4.35 4.35 1205 301
8 Buoyancy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 Water Current 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
1.52 Load Combination at the Top of Pier cap for ULS condition
P Horizontal Force (kN) Moment (kN-m)

S.No Load Combination Remark
(kN)
HT HL MT ML
1 Group I (Case-1) 23396 532 1890 4538 2426
2 Group I (Case-2) 22541 283 1828 2641 3363
3 Group I (Case-3) 22570 532 1890 10248 2611
4 Group II(Case-1) Wind Load 22179 887 1569 4977 2234
7 Group III (Case-1) Seismic Transverse 18713 4243 169 7578 268
Refer Annexure
10 Group IV (Case-1) Seismic Longitudinal 18804 0 4107 383 1624
1.53 Load Combination at the Top of Pier cap for SLS condition

(kN)
HT HL MT ML
1 Group I (Case-1 service-Rare) 17018 355 1260 3025 1617
4 Group II (Case-1 wind load-Rare) 16173 591 1026 3286 1467
7 Group III (Case-1 Service-Frequent) 16599 296 952 2361 1236
8 Group III (Case-2 Service-Frequent) 16172 157 918 1353 1689 Refer Annexure
10 Group IV (Case 1 Wind Load-Frequent) 15405 355 323 1493 545
13 Group V (Case-1- Quasi permanent) 15513 0 0 0 0
1.54 Dead Load - Substructure

12.90 4.10
4.1 m
W1
0.750
0.750
W2 Traffic Direction
5.38
W3
6.40 1.80
0.92
2.25 m
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
Load of Pier
W2 Area of flared portion (top) = 52.89 m2 Pedestal :
Area of flared portion (bot.) = 29.52 m2 Width = 1.100 m
Height of flared portion = 0.75 m Length = 1.100 m
Volume of flared portion = 30.5 m3 P (KN) e (m) from Pier Base
CG of the flared portion from top of straight
= 0.42 m 762.02 6.72
portion of pier
W3 Width = 6.40 m
Breadth = 1.80 m
Area of c/s of straight portion = 11.520 m2
Total Height of straight portion = 6.30 m =7.80-0.75-0.75
Volume of straight portion = 72.576 m3 P (KN) e (m) from Pier Base
1814.4 3.15
W1 Pier Cap
Length of pier cap = 12.90 m
Width of pier cap = 4.1 m
Avg.Thickness of pier cap = 0.75 m P (KN) e (m) from Pier Base
Volume of pier cap = 39.6675 m3 991.6875 7.425
Self wt of pier + pier cap = 3568 kN

Combined 3568 5.100
1.55 Summary of Load at the Pile Cap Top
Height of the pier = 7.800 m

(kN)
HT HL eT eL MT ML
1 D.L (Super + Substructure ) 16244 0 0 0 0 0 0
D.S.S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 S.I.D.L- Fixed 1028 0 0 0 0 0 0
S.I.D.L- variable 1508 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Live Load
L.L (Case 1- Max P) 2520 0 0 0 0 2395 1162
L.L (Case 2 - Max ML) 1808 0 0 0 0 1718 2169
L.L (Case 3 - MT) 1628 0 0 0 0 6358 1170
L.L (Case 1-Max P) -60 91 0 11.85 0 1075 0
L.L (Case 2 - Max ML) -43 65 0 11.85 0 771 0
L.L (Case 3 - Max MT) -39 59 0 11.85 0 695 0
5.1.4 Substructure -428 642 0 5.10 0 3275 0
5.2.3 Substructure -428 0 642 0.00 5.10 0 3275
6 Centrifugal Force
Max P 0 0 0 11.85 0 0 0
Max ML 0 0 0 11.85 0 0 0
Max MT 0 0 0 11.85 0 0 0
7 Wind Load
Live load max transverse case 0 277 69 11.55 11.55 3201 800
On substructure 0 48 151 3.90 3.90 188 587
8 Vehicle Collision Load
Longitudinal - Main Component 0 0 1000 0 2.4 0 2420
Transverse - Main Component 0 500 0 3.92 0 1960 0
Longitudinal - Residual Component 0 0 500 0 2.4 0 1210
Transverse - Residual Component 0 250 0 3.92 0 980 0
8 Construction Load
8.1 L.G. Case 1 (Max 'P') 0 0 0.00 7.80 7.80 0 0
8.2 L.G. Case 2 (Max 'ML') 0 0 0 7.80 7.80 0 0
8.3 L.G. Case 3 (Max 'MT') 0 0 0 7.80 7.80 0 0
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
8.4 Dead Load of Superstructure 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
8.5 Dead Load of Substructure 3568 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
8.6 Seismic Load Superstructure 0 0 0 9.11 0.00 0 0
8.7 Seismic Load Substructure 0 0 0 5.10 0.00 0 0
Newly added 8 Water current

LWL Normal/Seismic
HFL Normal 35 45.9 84 109.0
HFL-seismic 34 45 83 107
9 Buyoyancy
LWL Normal/Seismic -106
HFL Normal -503
HFL-seismic -503
10 Hydrodynamic
LWL Seismic 2 2 1 1
HFL Seismic 14 14 27 27
1.56 Seismic Force Combination

S.No Combination P HT HL MT ML
1 Seismic - Transverse
1.1 (0.3L+T-0.3V) Max. P -694 3471 1014 30137 7677
1.2 (0.3L+T+0.3V) Max. P 694 3471 1014 30137 7677
1.3 (0.3L+T-0.3V) Max ML -689 3445 1014 29833 7677
1.4 (0.3L+T+0.3V) Max ML 689 3445 1014 29833 7677
1.5 (0.3L+T-0.3V) Max MT -688 3439 1014 29757 7677
1.6 (0.3L+T+0.3V) Max MT 688 3439 1014 29757 7677
2 Seismic - Longitudinal
2.1 (L+0.3T-0.3V) Max. P -676 1041 3380 9041 25591
2.2 (L+0.3T+0.3V) Max. P 676 1041 3380 9041 25591
2.3 (L+0.3T-0.3V) Max ML -676 1034 3380 8950 25591
2.4 (L+0.3T+0.3V) Max ML 676 1034 3380 8950 25591
2.5 (L+0.3T-0.3V) Max MT -676 1032 3380 8927 25591
2.6 (L+0.3T+0.3V) Max MT 676 1032 3380 8927 25591
3 Seismic - Vertical
3.1 (0.3L+0.3T-V) Max. P -2314 1041 1014 9041 7677
3.2 (0.3L+0.3T+V) Max. P 2314 1041 1014 9041 7677
3.3 (0.3L+0.3T-V) Max ML -2297 1034 1014 8950 7677
3.4 (0.3L+0.3T+V) Max ML 2297 1034 1014 8950 7677
3.5 (0.3L+0.3T-V) Max MT -2293 1032 1014 8927 7677
3.6 (0.3L+0.3T+V) Max MT 2293 1032 1014 8927 7677
1.57 Load Combination at the Top of Pile cap - SLS
LWL - Case
Moment Resultant
P Horizontal Force (kN) Moment (kN-m) kNm
(kN)
HT HL MT ML
1 Group I (Case-1 service-Rare) 20570 384 1350 5805 11773 13127
4 Group II (Case-1 wind load-Rare) 19725 639 1177 7919 10018 12771
7 Group III (Case-1 Service-Frequent) 20151 320 1028 4678 8938 10088
8 Group III (Case-2 Service-Frequent) 19724 181 1028 2672 9542 9909 Refer Annexure
10 Group IV (Case 1 Wind Load-Frequent) 18957 384 413 4273 3392 5455
13 Group V (Case-1- Quasi permanent) 19066 0 0 0 0 0
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
HFL - Case
Horizontal Force (kN) Moment (kN-m) Moment Resultant

P
S.No Load Combination kNm Remark
(kN) HT HL MT ML

1.58 Load Combination at the Top of Pile cap - ULS

LWL- Case
P Horizontal Force (kN) Moment (kN-m) Moment Resultant
(kN) HT HL MT ML
1 Group I (Case-1) 28197 576 2026 8708 17660 19690
2 Group I (Case-2) 27342 326 2026 5015 18868 19523
3 Group I (Case-3) 27371 576 2026 14417 17845 22941
4 Group II(Case-1) Wind Load 26980 959 1795 11927 15290 19391
7 Group III (Case-1A) Seismic Transverse(-V) 25212 5209 1690 45590 13612 47578
Refer Annexure
8 Group III (Case-1B) Seismic Transverse(+V) 27295 5209 1690 45590 13612 47578
9 Group III (Case-2A) Seismic Transverse (-V) 25106 5171 1690 45026 13773 47085
Group III (Case-2B) Seismic Transverse

10 25106 5171 1690 45026 13773 47085
(+V)
Group IV (Case-1A) Seismic Longitudinal(-

13 25239 1563 5073 13945 38574 41017
V)
Group IV (Case-1B) Seismic
14 27287 5169 1524 45133 11703 46626
Longitudinal(+V)
15 25125 1551 5073 13700 38735 41086
V)
16 27153 1551 5073 13700 38735 41086
Longitudinal(+V)
17 25129 1548 5073 14535 38598 41244
V)
18 27157 1548 5073 14535 38598 41244
Longitudinal(+V)
18 Group V (Case-1A) Seismic Vertical(-V) 22782 1563 1690 13945 13612 19487
18 Group V (Case-1B) Seismic Vertical(+V) 29724 1563 1690 13945 13612 19487
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
HFL- Case
P kNm
(kN) HT HL MT ML
1 Group I (Case-1) 28137 611 2071 8792 17769 19825
2 Group I (Case-2) 27283 362 2071 5099 18977 19650
3 Group I (Case-3) 27311 611 2071 14502 17954 23079
7 Group III (Case-1A) Seismic Transverse(-V) 24814 5255 1739 45698 13727 47715 Refer annex

10 26775 5217 1739 45134 13888 47222
(+V)

13 24842 1601 5129 14036 38707 41173
V)
14 26889 5207 1580 45224 11836 46747
Longitudinal(+V)
15 24728 1589 5129 13791 38868 41242
V)
16 26756 1589 5129 13791 38868 41242
Longitudinal(+V)
17 24732 1586 5129 14626 38731 41401
V)
18 26760 1586 5129 14626 38731 41401
Longitudinal(+V)
25 Group VI (Accidental) Case 1 19082 0 2379 287 10930 10934
11.52 123
1.60 Summary of Load at pile cap bottom Footing 277
Depth of pile cap /Open foundation = 2.25 W1 6926 e1 1.125
Height from Piercap Top = 10.05 m W2 0 e2 2.250
Dead load of the Pier at this level = 3568 kN Soil W3 2053 e3 2.71
Dead load of the pile cap = 6926 kN W= 8979 e= 1.487
0.000
3.17
0.9 e3
Wt of soil 2053 KN e2
Wt of water from GL to HFL acting on Footing 3850 KN e1
buyoyancy on soil 1027 KN
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
Pier +Piercap 3568 e11 = 7.350
Total weight to be used for seismic in foundation 6926 KN Sub+Fdn 12547 3.4809
(Only for exposed pile cap, Zero in case of embedded Open foundation or pile cap)

(kN)
HT HL eT eL MT ML
D.S.S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 S.I.D.L- Fixed 1028 0 0 0 0 0 0
S.I.D.L- variable 1508 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Live Load
L.L (Case 1-Max P) 2520 0 0 0 0 2395 1162
L.L (Case 2 - Max ML) 1808 0 0 0 0 1718 2169
L.L (Case 3 - Max MT) 1628 0 0 0 0 6358 1170
4 Longitudinal Forces (additional vertical force is neglected) *** HL in trans seismic is not shown here. Cell H679 linked separately in Annex tables
L.L (Case 1-Max P) -60 91 0 14.10 0 1279 0
L.L (Case 2 - Max ML) -43 65 0 14.10 0 918 0
L.L (Case 3 - Max MT) -39 59 0 14.10 0 827 0
5.1.4 Substructure + Foundation -1259 1889 0 3.48 0 6575 0
5.2 Seismic Force (Longitudianal)
5.2.3 Substructure + Foundation -1259 0 1889 0 3.48 0 6575
6 Centrifugal Force
Max P 0 0 0 14.10 0 0 0
Max ML 0 0 0 14.10 0 0 0
Max MT 0 0 0 14.10 0 0 0
7 Wind Load
Live load max transverse case 0 277.12 69 13.80 13.80 3824 956
On substructure 0 48 151 6.15 6.15 297 926
8 Construction Load
8.1 L.G. Case 1 (Max 'P') 0 0 0 10.05 10.05 0 0
8.2 L.G. Case 2 (Max 'ML') 0 0 0 10.05 10.05 0 0
8.3 L.G. Case 3 (Max 'MT') 0 0 0 10.05 10.05 0 0
8.4 Dead Load of the Superstructure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8.5 Dead Load of the Substructure 10494 0 0 0 0 0 0
8.6 Seismic Load of Superstructure 0 0 0 11.36 0.00 0 0
8.7 Seismic Load of Substructure 0 0 0 7.35 0.00 0 0
8 Water current
LWL Normal/Seismic
HFL Normal 101 71.1 243 242.7
9 Buyoyancy
HFL Normal -4300
HFL-seismic -4300
10 Hydrodynamic
LWL Seismic 144 160 142 158
HFL Seismic 150 166 190 205
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
1.1 (0.3L+T-0.3V) Max. P -944 4718 1388 39801 10515
1.2 (0.3L+T+0.3V) Max. P 944 4718 1388 39801 10515
1.3 (0.3L+T-0.3V) Max ML -938 4692 1388 39440 10515
1.4 (0.3L+T+0.3V) Max ML 938 4692 1388 39440 10515
1.5 (0.3L+T-0.3V) Max MT -937 4686 1388 39349 10515
1.6 (0.3L+T+0.3V) Max MT 937 4686 1388 39349 10515
2.1 (L+0.3T-0.3V) Max. P -925 1415 4627 11940 35051
2.2 (L+0.3T+0.3V) Max. P 925 1415 4627 11940 35051
2.3 (L+0.3T-0.3V) Max ML -925 1408 4627 11832 35051
2.4 (L+0.3T+0.3V) Max ML 925 1408 4627 11832 35051
2.5 (L+0.3T-0.3V) Max MT -925 1406 4627 11805 35051
2.6 (L+0.3T+0.3V) Max MT 925 1406 4627 11805 35051
3.1 (0.3L+0.3T-V) Max. P -3145 1415 1388 11940 10515
3.2 (0.3L+0.3T+V) Max. P 3145 1415 1388 11940 10515
3.3 (0.3L+0.3T-V) Max ML -3128 1408 1388 11832 10515
3.4 (0.3L+0.3T+V) Max ML 3128 1408 1388 11832 10515
3.5 (0.3L+0.3T-V) Max MT -3124 1406 1388 11805 10515
3.6 (0.3L+0.3T+V) Max MT 3124 1406 1388 11805 10515
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
1.62 Summary of Load at pile cap bottom at SLS condition
LWL - Case
Horizontal Force (kN) Moment Resultant
Moment (kN-m)
P kNm
(kN)
HT HL MT ML

HFL - Case
Moment (kN-m)
P kNm
(kN)
HT HL MT ML
7 Group III (Case-1 Service-Frequent) 32351 421 1099 5641 11493 12803 Remark
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
1.63 Summary of Load for Base Pressure at pile cap bottom

LWL- Case
P
(kN) HT HL MT ML
1 Group I (Case-1) 25872 0 1171 1916 13113 13252
2 Group I (Case-2) 25302 0 1171 1374 13918 13986
3 Group I (Case-3) 25322 0 1171 5722 13236 14420
8 Group III (Case-1B) Seismic Transverse(+V) 25533 6512 2765 54257 23194 59007 Refer Annexure

10 25412 6478 2765 53661 23355 58523
(+V)

13 23010 1954 6406 16545 47663 50453
V)
14 25508 1954 6406 16545 47663 50453
Longitudinal(+V)
15 22896 1943 6406 16291 5302 17132
V)
16 25394 1943 6406 16291 47824 50523
Longitudinal(+V)
17 22900 1941 6406 17123 47688 50669
V)
18 25398 1941 6406 17123 47688 50669
Longitudinal(+V)
HFL- Case
Moment (kN-m)
P kNm
(kN)
HT HL MT ML
1 Group I (Case-1) 29325 101 1243 2159 13355 13529
2 Group I (Case-2) 28755 101 1243 1618 14161 14253
3 Group I (Case-3) 28774 101 1243 5966 13479 14740
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee

10 28865 6576 2833 53939 23604 58878
(+V)

13 26463 2048 6479 16791 47945 50800
V)
14 28961 2048 6479 16791 47945 50800
Longitudinal(+V)
15 26349 2037 6479 16536 5583 17453
V)
16 28847 2037 6479 16536 48106 50869
Longitudinal(+V)
17 26353 2035 6479 17369 47970 51017
V)
18 28851 2035 6479 17369 47970 51017
Longitudinal(+V)
1.64 Summary of Load at pile cap bottom at ULS condition
LWL- CASE

(kN) HT HL MT ML
1 Group I (Case-1) 39749 576 2026 10003 22218 24366
2 Group I (Case-2) 38894 326 2026 5749 23426 24121
3 Group I (Case-3) 38923 576 2026 15712 22403 27364
10 36364 9645 3027 80283 23441 83635
(+V)
Refer Annexure
13 32704 2909 9529 24605 71323 75448
V)
14 36452 2909 9529 24605 71323 75448
Longitudinal(+V)
15 32590 2893 9529 24277 71484 75494
V)
16 36338 2893 9529 24277 71484 75494
Longitudinal(+V)
17 32594 2890 9529 25091 71348 75631
V)
18 36342 2890 9529 25091 71348 75631
Longitudinal(+V)
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
HFL - CASE

(kN) HT HL MT ML kNm
1 Group I (Case-1) 44887 677 2097 10246 22461 24687
2 Group I (Case-2) 44032 427 2097 5992 23668 24415
3 Group I (Case-3) 44061 677 2097 15956 22646 27702

10 41165 9743 3096 80561 23690 83972
(+V)
Refer Annexure
13 37504 3003 9602 24850 71605 75794
V)

14 41252 3003 9602 24850 71605 75794
Longitudinal(+V)

15 37390 2987 9602 24523 71766 75840
V)
16 41138 2987 9602 24523 71766 75840
Longitudinal(+V)

17 37394 2983 9602 25337 71629 75978
V)
18 41142 2983 9602 25337 71629 75978
Longitudinal(+V)
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile
Detailed Engineering Consultancy Services for Rehabiliation 4800197-GGN-

and Upgradation by Four-Laning of NH-31D from KM 113.20 DD-013
Job No. 4800197
to KM 154.854 (Package-II A) Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari
section in the state of West Bengal Date

Design of Pier P5 for Ch: 123+518.5 29-Nov-19
Akshit S.Chatterjee
CALCULATION OF HYDRODYNAMIC FORCES ON BRIDGE
Under H.F.L. =>In longitudinal direction
Existing Levels Depth submerged

H.F.L. = 57.695 m Pier cap 0.000
Pier cap bottom level = 63.754 m Pier shaft 0.920
Pier shaft bottom level = 56.775 m Pile cap 2.250
Pile cap bottom level = 54.525 m
Max. Scour Level = 50.685 m
pile cap
radius of
pier shaft radius of enveloping
enveloping circle
circle
11.4
1.80 10.8
Dimension of pier shaft transverse direction 1.80

Dimension of pier shaft long direction 1.80
Radius ofenveloping circle trans 0.900
Radius ofenveloping circle long 0.900
Dimension of Pile cap in transverse direction 11.4

Dimension of Pile cap in long direction 10.8
Horizontal Force due to hydromdynamic effect, F=Ce.Ah.We
where Ce : coefficient depends on ratio of height of submerged portion and radius of
enveloping circle
W e : weight of the enveloping cylinder in Kg
Ah : horizontal seismic coefficient
Design of Pier

Job No. 4800197
to KM 154.854 (Package-II A) Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari
section in the state of West Bengal Date

Akshit S.Chatterjee
Long Seismic
Element H r H/r Ce We Ah F
(m) (m) (t) (long) (kN)
Pier Shaft 0.92 0.900 1.022 0.575 2.341 0.18 2.377
Pile Cap 2.25 5.700 0.395 0.39 231.999 0.18 159.769
Point of application of loads

Elements C1 C3 C4 C3.F C4.H (m)
Pier Shaft 1 1 0.4286 2.377 0.394 from pier shaft base
Pile Cap 1 1 0.4286 159.769 0.964 from pile cap base
Under H.F.L. =>In Transverse direction

radius of
pier shaft radius of enveloping pile cap
enveloping circle
circle
10.8
1.8 11.4
(m) (m) (t) (trans) (kN)
Pier Shaft 0.92 0.900 1.022 0.575 2.341 0.18 2.377
Pile Cap 2.25 5.400 0.417 0.39 208.461 0.18 143.559

Design of Pier
Detailed Engineering Consultancy Services for Rehabiliation and 4800197-GGN-DD-013

Job No. 4800197
154.854 (Package-II A) Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the Date
state of West Bengal

Akshit S.Chatterjee

(REFER: IS1893-3-Cl 11 )
H.F.L. = 61.145 m Pier cap 0.000 m
Pier cap bottom level = 63.754 m Pier shaft 4.370 m
Pier shaft bottom level = 56.775 m Pile cap 2.250 m
pile cap
radius of
enveloping circle
circle
11.4
1.80 10.8
Dimension of pier shaft transverse direction 1.80 m

Dimension of pier shaft long direction 1.80 m
Radius ofenveloping circle trans 0.900 m
Radius ofenveloping circle long 0.900 m
Dimension of Pile cap in transverse direction 11.4 m

Dimension of Pile cap in long direction 10.8 m
enveloping circle
We : weight of the enveloping cylinder in Kg
Long Seismic
Element H r H/r Ce We Ah F M
(m) (m) (t) (long) (kN) (kN-m)
Pier Shaft 4.37 0.900 4.856 0.73 11.120 0.18 14.334 26.848
Pile Cap 2.25 5.700 0.395 0.39 240.779 0.18 165.815 205.181
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile

Job No. 4800197

Akshit S.Chatterjee

Elements C1 C3 C4 C3.F C4.H (m) Level (m)
Pier Shaft 1 1 0.4286 14.334 1.873 from pier shaft base 58.648
Pile Cap 1 1 0.4286 165.815 0.964 from pile cap base 55.489

radius of
enveloping circle
circle
10.8
1.8 11.4
(m) (m) (t) (trans) (kN) (kN-m)
Pier Shaft 4.37 0.900 4.856 0.73 11.120 0.18 14.334 26.848
Pile Cap 2.25 5.400 0.417 0.39 217.240 0.18 149.605 189.549

Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile
Detailed Engineering Consultancy Services for Rehabiliation and Upgradation 4800197-GGN-DD-013

by Four-Laning of NH-31D from KM 113.20 to KM 154.854 (Package-II A) Job No. 4800197
Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the state of West Bengal Date

Akshit S.Chatterjee
2.0 Pier - Section Design
Pier Section
Reinforcement Details
Dia of bar provided trans direction 52 nos 25 dia at each face

Dia of bar provided long direction 25 nos 25 dia at each face
Total Area 75556.3 mm^2
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile


Akshit S.Chatterjee
ULS Section capacity check
UR 0.86 OK
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile


Akshit S.Chatterjee
Shear Capacity due to concrete
Shear capacity of concrete is more than longitudnal shear force
SLS - stress check
Rare - critical combination
Limit
Stress in concrete 5.2 Mpa 16.8 Mpa ok
Stress in Steel 27.5 Mpa 440 Mpa ok
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile


Akshit S.Chatterjee
Crack width - critical combination
As QP moments are less than cracking moments of section, therforcesection remains uncracked
Limit
Crack width 0 mm 0.3 mm OK
section is uncracked
Minimum Reinforcment for Pier
Vertical Reinforcement
Dia of vertical bars should not be less than 12 mm OK
Area of minimum RF provided should be greater of .1 Ned/fyd or .002Ac

6215.088 23040
Provided Ast 75556.25 OK
Transverse Reinforcement
Spacing Dia
Provided in Drawing 150 mm OK 12 mm OK
spacing of transverse RF should not be more than dia should not be less than
300 mm 8 mm
1800 mm 6.25 mm
200 mm
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile
Shear Capapcity of pier (concrete)
bw 6400 mm Vz 5129 kN
deff 1734 mm N 22296362 N
Fck 35 Mpa Ac 11097600 mm^2
Asl 25513 mm^2 N/Ac 2.0091 ok
P1 0.0023
K 1.33962 ok 0.2fcd 3.12
Vrdc 6642 kN
Vmin 3155.7 kN Vrdc ok
Shear force is less than shear capacity of concrete hence no shear RF required
26
Detailed Engineering Consultancy Services for Rehabiliation and Upgradation by Four-Laning of 4800197-GGN-DD-013
NH-31D from KM 113.20 to KM 154.854 (Package-II A) Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the Job No 4800197
state of West Bengal Date

Akshit S.Chatterjee
Design of Pile Foundation - Base Pressure
No. of piles = 9 A ML
Eccentricity between
Column and C.G of Pile = 0.00 m
10.8
Minimum Thickness of Pile
cap = 2.25 m
Thickness of pile cap = 2.25 m OK
Pile offset from edge = 0.15 m
-4.5, 4.8 0, 4.8 4.5, 4.8
Pile diameter = 1.5 m
Area of pile = 1.767 m2
Pier Size = 1.8 X 6.40 11.4 MT
3
Unit Weight of R.C.C = 2.5 t/m B B
Self weight of Pile cap = 693 t -4.5, 0 0, 0 4.5, 0
Total Length L1+Lf (Max scour) = 13.4 m
Length of pile = 21.0 m
Reduction factor for pile B.M = 0.90 (IS 2911 part 1, sec iv, fig 5)
Loads on Pile -4.5, -4.8 0, -4.8 4.5, -4.8

Normal-LWL Seismic & WInd - LWL
Maximum Pile Load = 350 t. OK 558 OK A
Minimum Pile Load = 212 t. OK -30 OK Max. horizontal load on pile ULS = 19 T OK
Normal-HFL Seismic - HFL .
Maximum Pile Load = 390 OK 598.25 OK
Minimum Pile Load = 249 OK 16 OK
Calculation of loads on piles for each load combination
ML x 4.5 ML ML = Moment along longitudinal direction
Load due to ML = =
1 x 121.5 27.0 MT = Moment along transverse direction
MT x 4.8 MT (REFER ANNEXURE VI)
Load due to MT = =
1 x 138.2 28.8 Normal Seismic
Type of Load case Sr no Pile capacity from soil investigation report = 500 t 625 t
Normal Load case 1 to 3 Maximum uplift Capacity of Pile = 150 t 187.5 t
Wind Load case 4 to 6 Lateral pile capacity from soil investigation report = 75 t
Seismic Transverse 7 to 12
Seismic Longitudinal 13 to 18
Seismic Vertical 19 to 24 ( self wt of pile excluded)
LWL -Case
Vertical Load due to Load due BM for pile

Load Max. load Min. load Resultant H
load P MT (T-m) ML (T-m) HL (T) HT (T) P/n (T) ML -P1 to MT -P1 =H(L1+Lf)/
no. (T) (T) (T)
(T) (T-m) (T-m) 2 (T-m)
1
2587 192 1311 117 0 287 49 7 343 232 13 79
N
o 2
r 2530 137 1392 117 0 281 52 5 337 225 13 79
m
a 3
l 2532 572 1324 117 0 281 49 20 350 212 13 79
4
2502 984 1594 147 64 278 59 34 371 185 18 108
W
i 5
2445 547 1675 147 36 272 62 19 353 191 17 102
n
d 6
2447 1364 1607 147 64 272 60 47 379 165 18 108
7 2299 5395 2661 276 651 255 99 187 541 -30 79 475
8 2553 5426 2319 276 651 284 86 188 558 9 79 475
9 2288 5366 2335 276 648 254 86 186 527 -19 78 473
10 2541 5366 2335 276 648 282 86 186 555 10 78 473
11
2288 5441 2322 276 647 254 86 189 529 -21 78 473
12 2541 5441 2322 276 647 282 86 189 557 7 78 473
S 13 2301 1655 4766 641 195 256 177 57 489.65 22 74 450
e
14 2551 1655 4766 641 195 283 177 57 517.41 49 74 450
i
s 15 2290 1629 530 641 194 254 20 57 330.60 178 74 450
m 16 2539 1629 4782 641 194 282 177 57 515.85 48 74 450
i
17 2290 1712 4769 641 194 254 177 59 490.52 18 74 450
c
18 2540 1712 4769 641 194 282 177 59 518.28 46 74 450
19 2001 1655 2661 309 195 222 99 57 378.38 66 41 246
20 2851 1655 2661 309 195 317 99 57 472.74 161 41 246
21 1992 1629 2677 309 194 221 99 57 377.08 66 41 245
22 2837 1629 2677 309 194 315 99 57 470.92 159 41 245
23 1993 1712 2664 309 194 221 99 59 379.58 63 41 245
24 2837 1712 2664 309 194 315 99 59 473.29 157 41 245
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile

Akshit S.Chatterjee
HFL Case

no. (T) (T) (T)
(T) (T-m) (T-m) 2 (T-m)
N 1
o 2932 216 1336 124 10 326 49 7 382.79 269 14 84
r 2
m 2876 162 1416 124 10 320 52 6 377.56 261 14 84
a
3
l 2877 597 1348 124 10 320 50 21 390.35 249 14 84
4 2847 1008 1619 154 74 316 60 35 411.31 221 19 115
W
5
i 2790 571 1699 154 46 310 63 20 392.81 227 18 108
n
6
d 2792 1389 1631 154 74 310 60 48 418.87 202 19 115
7 2644 5423 2344 283 661 294 87 188 568.88 19 80 483
8 2899 5454 2344 283 661 322 87 189 598.25 46 80 483
9 2633 5394 2360 283 658 293 87 187 567.28 18 80 481
10 2886 5394 2360 283 658 321 87 187 595.43 46 80 481
11 2634 5469 2347 283 657 293 87 190 569.43 16 79 481
12 2887 5469 2347 283 657 321 87 190 597.54 44 79 481
S 13 2646 1679 4794 648 205 294 178 58 529.90 58 75 457
e 14 2896 1679 4794 648 205 322 178 58 557.67 86 75 457
i
15 2635 1654 558 648 204 293 21 57 370.86 215 75 456
s
m 16 2885 1654 4811 648 204 321 178 57 556.11 85 75 456
i 17 2635 1737 4797 648 203 293 178 60 530.78 55 75 456
c
18 2885 1737 4797 648 203 321 178 60 558.54 83 75 456
19 2347 1679 2686 316 205 261 99 58 418.52 103 42 253
20 3196 1679 2686 316 205 355 99 58 512.87 197 42 253
21 2338 1654 2702 316 204 260 100 57 417.22 102 42 253
22 3182 1654 2702 316 204 354 100 57 511.06 196 42 253
23 2338 1737 2689 316 203 260 100 60 419.71 100 42 253
24 3182 1737 2689 316 203 354 100 60 513.43 194 42 253
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile
Detailed Engineering Consultancy Services for Rehabiliation and Upgradation by Four- 4800197-GGN-DD-013
Laning of NH-31D from KM 113.20 to KM 154.854 (Package-II A) Ghoshpukur- Job No 4800197
Salsalabari section in the state of West Bengal Date

Akshit S.Chatterjee
Design of Pile Foundation - SLS
No. of piles = 9 ###

0
Column and C.G of Pile = m
Minimum Thickness of
0.85
Pile cap = 2.25 m 4.8 4.8 4.8
Thickness of pile cap = 2.25 m
2
Area of pile = 1.767 m
Pier Size = 1.8 X 6.40
0 0 0
3
Unit Weight of R.C.C = 2.5 t/m
Self weight of Pile cap = 692.6 t 11.4
Total Length L1+Lf = 13.4 m
Length of pile = 21.0 m -4.8 -4.8 -4.8

Reduction factor for pile B.M= 0.90 (IS 2911 part 1, sec iv, fig 5)
Loads on Pile
Normal HFL
Maximum Pile Load = 408 t. 451
Minimum Pile Load = 218 t. 259 .
Calculation of loads on piles for each load combination Max. horizontal load on pile = 16.69 T

Load due to ML = =
MT 4.8 x MT (REFER ANNEXURE VI)
Load due to MT = =
1 138.2 x 28.8 Pile capacity from soil investigation report 500 t
Type of Load case Sr no Maximum uplift Capacity of Pile = 150 t
Normal Load case-rare 1 to 3 Lateral pile capacity from soil investigation reporty 75 t
Wind Load case -rare 4 to 6
Normal Load case-frequent 7 to 9
Wind Load case -frquent 10 to 12
Quasi Permanent 13 ( self wt of pile excluded)
LWL - Case
Vertical Load due Load due BM for pile

Load Max. Resultant
load P MT (T-m) ML (T-m) HL (T) HT (T) P/n (T) to ML -P1 to MT -P1 Min. load (T) =H(L1+Lf)/
no. load (T) H (T)
(T) (T-m) (T-m) 2 (T-m)
1 2898 667 1481 135 38 322 55 23 400 244 16 94

2 2841 383 1562 135 22 316 58 13 387 245 15 92
3 2843 1047 1494 135 38 316 55 36 408 224 16 94
4 2813 936 1267 118 64 313 47 32 392 233 15 90
5 2771 513 1327 118 36 308 49 18 375 241 14 83
6 2772 1221 1276 118 64 308 47 42 398 218 15 90
7 2856 540 1125 103 32 317 42 19 378 257 12 72
8 2813 308 1185 103 18 313 44 11 367 258 12 70
9 2815 825 1134 103 32 313 42 29 383 242 12 72
10 2737 514 432 41 38 304 16 18 338 270 6 38
11
2725 273 448 41 22 303 17 9 329 277 5 31
12 2726 590 435 41 38 303 16 20 339 266 6 38
13 2747 0 0 0 0 305 0 0 305 305 0 0
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile

Akshit S.Chatterjee
HFL - Case
Load Max. Resultant
no. load (T) H (T)
(T) (T-m) (T-m) 2 (T-m)
1 3277 691 1505 142 48 364 56 24 444 284 17 101
2 3220 408 1586 142 32 358 59 14 431 285 16 98
3 3222 1072 1518 142 48 358 56 37 451 265 17 101
4 3192 960 1291 125 74 355 48 33 436 274 16 98
5 3150 537 1351 125 46 350 50 19 419 281 15 89
6 3151 1246 1300 125 74 350 48 43 442 259 16 98
7 3235 564 1149 110 42 359 43 20 422 297 13 79
8 3192 332 1210 110 28 355 45 12 411 298 13 76
9 3194 850 1159 110 42 355 43 29 427 282 13 79
10 3116 538 456 48 48 346 17 19 382 311 8 46
11 3104 298 473 48 32 345 18 10 373 317 6 39
12 3105 614 459 48 48 345 17 21 383 307 8 46
13 3127 0 0 0 0 347 0 0 347 347 0 0
..1 Calculation of depth of fixity and maximum moment in pile for Maximum scour
The depth of fixity and bending moments in the pile have been worked out as per
IS 2911 Part 1/ sec2 Appendix C (clause 5.5.2). The pile is considered to be in submerged soil of medium sand type
as per the soil report. Fixed head condition of piles is applicable because of pile cap at the top.
dia = Diameter of the pile = 1.500 m

T = (E * I / K1)^0.2
where
E = Youngs Modulus of the concrete in kg/cm 2 = 32000000 kn/m^2
I = Moment of Inertia of the pile cross section in cm=4 0.2485049 m^4
K1 = Modulus of subgrade reaction as per Table 1 = 4100 kn/m^3
Q = Resultant horizontal force on pile - NORMAL = t
CASE (MAX) 16.6879
= Resultant horizontal force on pile - SEISMIC = 12.0 t
T = (32000000 * 0.248504887637474 / 4100) ^ 0.2 )= 4.5 m
L1 = Free length of pile above ground level = 3.8 m

= 3.8 m
L1 / T = 3.8 / 4.5 = 0.8
Lf / T = (fig 2 - for fixed headed piles in sands ) = 2.1
Lf = 2.1 * 4.5 = 9.6 m

= 9.6 m
Y = Q * (L1 + Lf)3 / (12[pile
* E head
* I) deflection of equivalent cantilever for fixed head pile]
= 0.0042 m
4.2 mm
MF = Q * (L1 + Lf) / 2 [Fixed end moment of equivalent cantilever for fixed head pile ]
M = m * MF [actual maximum moment]

where
m = reduction factor [for fixed head pile] 0.90
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile

by Four-Laning of NH-31D from KM 113.20 to KM 154.854 (Package-II A)
Job No 4800197 Date
Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the state of West Bengal
Akshit S.Chatterjee
Pile Desgin-SLS
LWL - Case HFL - Case

S.no P ML MT HL HT S.no P ML MT HL HT
1 -2440 943 0 156 0 1 -2844 1009 0 167 0
2 -2445 919 0 152 0 2 -2849 979 0 162 0
3 -2242 943 0 156 0 3 -2646 1009 0 167 0
4 -2332 900 0 149 0 4 -2736 975 0 161 0
5 -2409 828 0 137 0 5 -2813 895 0 148 0
6 -2184 900 0 149 0 6 -2587 975 0 161 0
7 -3053 0 0 0 0 7 -3474 0 0 0 0
Pile design
SLS - Stress check
stress Limit
Compressive stress 3.1 Mpa 16.8 Mpa OK
Stress in steel 10.1 Mpa 440 Mpa OK
Result of critical case - SLS rare
Limit
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile
Laning of NH-31D from KM 113.20 to KM 154.854 (Package-II A) Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari Job No 4800197
section in the state of West Bengal
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
Design of Pile Foundation-ULS
10.8
No. of piles = 9
Eccentricity between Column
0
and C.G of Pile group = m
4.8 4.8 4.8 0.85
cap = 2.25 m
0 0 0
Area of pile = 1.767 m2 11.4
Unit Weight of R.C.C = 2.5 t/m3

Self weight of Pile cap = 692.6 t
Scouring length of Pile Max scour HFL-S LWL-S -4.8 -4.8 -4.8
Total Length L1+Lf = 13.4 m 12.4 m 11.3 m

Load due to ML = =
MT x 4.8 MT
Load due to MT = =
1 x 138.2 28.8
Type of Load case Sr no
Normal Load case 1 to 3
Wind Load case 4 to 6
Trans seismic Load case 7 to 12
Long seismic Load case 13 to 18
Vertical seismic load case 19 to 24
Accidental Load case 25 to 30
( self wt of pile excluded)
LWL- Case
Vertical Load due Load due to BM for pile
Load HT Max. Min. load Resultant
load P MT (T-m) ML (T-m) HL (T) P/n (T) to ML -P1 MT -P1 =H(L1+Lf)/2
no. (T) load (T) (T) H (T)
(T) (T-m) (T-m) (T-m)
1 3975 1000 2222 203 58 442 82 35 559 325 23 142
2 3889 575 2343 203 33 432 87 20 539 325 23 138
3 3892 1571 2240 203 58 432 83 55 570 295 23 142
4 3853 1409 1653 153 96 428 61 49 538 318 20 121
5 3788 773 2025 179 54 421 75 27 523 319 21 126
6 3790 1846 1947 179 96 421 72 64 557 285 23 137

7 3267 8112 2328 303 970 363 86 282 731 -5 113 683
8 3649 8112 2328 303 970 405 86 282 773 38 113 683
9 3256 8028 2344 303 964 362 87 279 727 -4 112 679
10 3636 8028 2344 303 964 404 87 279 770 38 112 679
11 3257 8097 2330 303 963 362 86 281 729 -6 112 678
12 3637 8097 2330 303 963 404 86 281 772 37 112 678
13 3270 2461 7132 953 291 363 264 85 713 14 111 670
14 3645 2461 7132 953 291 405 264 85 755 55 111 670
15 3259 2428 7148 953 289 362 265 84 711 13 111 669
16 3634 2428 7148 953 289 404 265 84 753 55 111 669
17 362 264 87 714 11 111 669

3259 2509 7135 953 289
18 404 264 87 755 52 111 669
3634 2509 7135 953 289
19 2821 2461 2396 303 291 313 89 85 488 139 47 282
20 4095 2461 2396 303 291 455 89 85 629 281 47 282
21 2813 2428 2412 303 289 313 89 84 486 139 47 281
22 4080 2428 2412 303 289 453 89 84 627 280 47 281
23 2814 2509 2399 303 289 313 89 87 489 137 47 281
24 4079 2509 2399 303 289 453 89 87 629 277 47 281
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
HFL - Case
1 4489 1025 2246 210 68 499 83 36 618 380 24 148
2 4403 599 2367 210 43 489 88 21 598 381 24 144
3 4406 1596 2265 210 68 490 84 55 629 350 24 148
4 4367 1433 1677 160 106 485 62 50 597 373 21 129
5 4301 797 2050 187 64 478 76 28 582 374 22 133
6 4304 1871 1971 187 106 478 73 65 616 340 24 144

7 3747 8140 2353 310 979 416 87 283 786 47 114 690
8 4129 8140 2353 310 979 459 87 283 829 89 114 690
9 3736 8056 2369 310 974 415 88 280 783 48 114 687
10 4116 8056 2369 310 974 457 88 280 825 90 114 687
11 3737 8125 2355 310 973 415 87 282 785 46 113 686
12 4117 8125 2355 310 973 457 87 282 827 88 113 686
13 3750 2485 7160 960 300 417 265 86 768 65 112 676
14 4125 2485 7160 960 300 458 265 86 810 107 112 676
15 3739 2452 7177 960 299 415 266 85 766 65 112 676
16 4114 2452 7177 960 299 457 266 85 808 106 112 676
17 3739 2534 7163 960 298 415 265 88 769 62 112 676
18 4114 2534 7163 960 298 457 265 88 810 104 112 676
19 3301 2485 2421 310 300 367 90 86 543 191 48 290
20 4575 2485 2421 310 300 508 90 86 684 332 48 290
21 3293 2452 2437 310 299 366 90 85 541 190 48 289
22 4560 2452 2437 310 299 507 90 85 682 331 48 289
23 3294 2534 2424 310 298 366 90 88 544 188 48 289
24 4559 2534 2424 310 298 507 90 88 684 329 48 289
Load case No:7 to 24 seismic load combination is taken as 1.35 times the forces transmitted to it by substructure as per Cl.219.8 of IRC : 6-2017
Calculation of depth of fixity and maximum moment in pile for HFL scour
Max scour
T = (E * I / K1)^0.2
where
E = Youngs Modulus of the concrete in kg/cm2 = 32000000 kn/m^2
I = Moment of Inertia of the pile cross section in =cm 4 0.2485049 m^4
K1 = Modulus of subgrade reaction as per Table 1= 4100 kn/m^3
Q = Resultant horizontal force on pile - =
NORMAL CASE (MAX) 24.5 t
= Resultant horizontal force on pile - =
SEISMIC 114.1 t
T = (32000000 * 0.248504887637474 / 4100) ^ 0.2

= ) 4.5 m
HFL-S scour LWL-S- Scour
L1 = Free length of pile above ground level = 3.8 m 2.794 m 1.748 m
= 3.8 m 2.8 m 1.7 m
L1 / T = 3.8 / 4.5 = 0.8 0.615 0.385
Lf / T = (fig 2 - for fixed headed piles in sands ) = 2.1 2.1 2.1
Lf = 2.1 * 4.5 = 9.6 m 9.6 m 9.6 m

= 9.6 m 9.6 m 9.6 m
Y = Q * (L1 + Lf)3 / (12 * [pile

E * I)head deflection of equivalent cantilever for fixed head pile]
= 0.0062 m
6.2 mm

where
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile
4800197-GGN-DD-013
Detailed Engineering Consultancy Services for Rehabiliation and Upgradation by
Four-Laning of NH-31D from KM 113.20 to KM 154.854 (Package-II A)
Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the state of West Bengal Job No 4800197 Date

Akshit S.Chatterjee
Pile Desgin- ULS

S.no P ML MT HT HL S.no P ML MT HT HL
1 -3246 1415 0 0 234 1 -3800 1481 0 0 245
2 -3254 1379 0 0 228 2 -3808 1438 0 0 238
3 -2949 1415 0 0 234 3 -3503 1481 0 0 245
4 -3180 1211 0 0 200 4 -3734 1288 0 0 213
5 -3190 1260 0 0 208 5 -3744 1327 0 0 219
6 -2849 1367 0 0 226 6 -3402 1442 0 0 238
7 49 6827 0 0 1129 7 -465 6903 0 0 1141
8 -375 6827 0 0 1129 8 -890 6903 0 0 1141
9 38 6793 0 0 1123 9 -477 6870 0 0 1136
10 -385 6793 0 0 1123 10 -899 6870 0 0 1136
11 56 6785 0 0 1122 11 -459 6862 0 0 1135
12 -366 6785 0 0 1122 12 -881 6862 0 0 1135
13 -138 6695 0 0 1107 13 -652 6761 0 0 1118
14 -554 6695 0 0 1107 14 -1069 6761 0 0 1118
15 -131 6692 0 0 1107 15 -645 6758 0 0 1117
16 -547 6692 0 0 1107 16 -1061 6758 0 0 1117
17 -108 6692 0 0 1106 17 -622 6757 0 0 1117
18 -524 6692 0 0 1106 18 -1039 6757 0 0 1117
19 -1392 2821 0 0 467 19 -1908 2898 0 0 479
20 -2808 2821 0 0 467 20 -3323 2898 0 0 479
21 -1389 2814 0 0 465 21 -1905 2891 0 0 478
22 -2797 2814 0 0 465 22 -3312 2891 0 0 478
23 -1367 2812 0 0 465 23 -1883 2889 0 0 478
24 -2773 2812 0 0 465 24 -3289 2889 0 0 478
Design of Pile section Fagus - ULS
Cross - section
Reinforcement details
Main steel Shear RF
no. of bar 27 no. of bar 27 dia 16 mm
dia 32 mm dia 32 mm spacing 150 mm
Total Asr 21715 mm^2 Total Asr 21714.69 mm^2
% of r/f 2.46 %
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile
4800197-GGN-DD-013

Akshit S.Chatterjee
Section check
UR 0.91 OK
Pier_P5_8.2m_123+518_9pile
Annexure - I
General
Ductile detailing shall be carried out for bridges located in zones III,IV and V of
seismic zone map of IRC:6
For Pier bottom level:

NEd = 29724 kN
Ac = 1.2E+07 mm2
As = 75556 mm2
fck = 35 N/mm2 fy = 550 N/mm2
hk = 0.074 < 0.08
Minimum confining reinforcement required
fyd = 478 N/mm2 fcd = 16 N/mm2
Confining reinforcement ratio wwd = rwfyd/fcd
6250 mm
B core dimension (along trans dimension)
1650 mm
D core dimension (along longitudinal dimension)
Dia. Of stirrup along B f = 12 mm
no. of legs along width (along trans dimension) = 27
Area of the stirupps and ties Asp = 3054 mm2
Dia. Of stirrup along D f = 10 mm
no. of legs along Depth (along long dimension) = 10
2
Confined area = 10312500 mm
100 mm
Spacing of hoops or ties SL =
Minimum Spacing is 200 Ref Fig 17.2 of Code
Volumetric ratio Pw, B (along trans dimension) = 0.004885805
Volumetric ratio Pw, D (along long dimension) = 0.004759989

ωwd
B = 0.149468399 min 0.12
ωwd
D = 0.145619387 min 0.12
Area of gross concrete section Ac = 11520000 mm2
Confined concrete area within the outside

dia of hoop ACC
10312500 mm2
=
Normalised axial force hk = 0.0737
reinforcement ratio rL = 0.0066

ww req = 0.017
Minimum design confining ωwd
= 0.120
reinforcement
O.K
Extent of confining reinforcement
Since nk < 0.3, Length of confinment = 1.8000 m

Refer:- IRC:112-2011 Cl 17.2.1.4
Confinement RF
DESIGN OF PILE CAP FOR PIER-P5
INPUT AND
LOAD CALCULATIONS
Detailed Engineering in Connection with Rehabilitation and Up- Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-013
Gradation to Four Laning of NH-31D from Km. 113+200 to km.
154+854 (Package-2-A) of Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in
the State of West Bengal on EPC mode Designed by: Checked by: Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
Layout of Pile cap

154+854 (Package-2-A) of Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the State
of West Bengal on EPC mode Designed by: Checked by: Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
ULS CONDITION
SUMMARY OF PILE LOADS

(Refer Design document- 4800197-GGN-DD-040 for Pier, ULS design summary)
LOAD CASE V (T) MT (T-m) ML (T-m)

Group I (Case-1) 3975 1000 2222
Group I (Case-2) 3889 575 2343
Group I (Case-3) 3892 1571 2240
Group II(Case-1) Wind Load 3853 1409 1653
Group III (Case-1A) Seismic Transverse(-
V) 3267 8112 2328
Group III (Case-1B) Seismic
Transverse(+V) 3649 8112 2328
Group III (Case-2A) Seismic Transverse (-
V) 3256 8028 2344
(+V) 3636 8028 2344
V) 3257 8097 2330
Transverse(+V) 3637 8097 2330
LWL
Group IV (Case-1A) Seismic Longitudinal(- CASE
V) 3270 2461 7132
Longitudinal(+V) 3645 2461 7132
V) 3259 2428 7148
V) 3259 2509 7135
Group V (Case-1A) Seismic Vertical(-V) 2821 2461 2396
Group V (Case-1B) Seismic Vertical(+V) 4095 2461 2396

Group I (Case-1) 4489 1025 2246
Group I (Case-2) 4403 599 2367
Group I (Case-3) 4406 1596 2265
V) 3747 8140 2353
Transverse(+V) 4129 8140 2353
V) 3736 8056 2369
HFL
CASE
Akshit S.Chatterjee
Group III (Case-2B) Seismic Transverse ULS CONDITION

(+V) 4116 8056 2369
V) 3737 8125 2355
Transverse(+V) 4117 8125 2355 HFL
Group IV (Case-1A) Seismic Longitudinal(- CASE
V) 3750 2485 7160
V) 3739 2452 7177
V) 3739 2534 7163
No. of piles = 9
Size of Pile cap = 10.8 x 11.4
SECTION MODULUS
PILE 1 2 3
ZT 28.8 1.00E+09 -28.8
ZL 27 27 27
SUMMARY OF FORCES FOR DESIGN OF PILE CAP IN LONGITUDINAL DIRECTION:
LOAD CASE 1 2 3 TOTAL
Group I (Case-1)
559 524 489 1572
Group I (Case-2)
539 519 499 1557
Group I (Case-3)
570 515 461 1546
Group II(Case-1) Wind Load

538 489 440 1468

523 496 469 1488

557 493 429 1480
V) 731 449 168 1348
Transverse(+V) 773 492 210 1475
V) 727 449 170 1346
(+V) 770 491 212 1473
V) 729 448 167 1345
LWL CASE
Akshit S.Chatterjee
Group III (Case-3B) Seismic ULS CONDITION

Transverse(+V) 772 490 209 1471
LWL CASE
V) 713 628 542 1883
Longitudinal(+V) 755 669 584 2008
V) 711 627 543 1881
Longitudinal(+V) 753 669 584 2006
V) 714 626 539 1879
Longitudinal(+V) 755 668 581 2004
Group V (Case-1A) Seismic Vertical(-V)

488 402 317 1207
Group V (Case-1B) Seismic Vertical(+V)

629 544 458 1631

486 402 318 1206

627 543 458 1628

489 402 314 1205
Group V (Case-3B) Seismic Vertical(+V) 629 542 455 1626
Group I (Case-1) 618 582 546 1746
Group I (Case-2) 598 577 556 1731
Group I (Case-3) 629 573 518 1720
Group II(Case-1) Wind Load 597 547 498 1642

V) 786 503 221 1510
Transverse(+V) 829 546 263 1638
V) 783 503 223 1509
(+V) 825 545 265 1635
V) 785 502 220 1507
Transverse(+V) 827 545 263 1634
HFL CASE
V) 768 682 596 2046
Longitudinal(+V) 810 724 637 2171
V) 766 681 596 2044
Longitudinal(+V) 808 723 638 2169
V) 769 681 593 2042
Longitudinal(+V) 810 722 634 2167
Group V (Case-1A) Seismic Vertical(-V) 543 456 370 1369

Akshit S.Chatterjee
ULS CONDITION
Longitudinal direction:-
MAXIMUM SHEAR = 2171 t

LEVER ARM = 3.60 m
MOMENT = 7814 tm
Density of concrete = 2.50 t/m3
Density of soil = 1.8 t/m3
Depth of pile cap = 2.25 m
Depth of cushion = 0.00 m
Downward Weight due to pile cap = 288.56 t
Lever arm = 2.25 m
Moment due to S.W. & Cushion = 649.27 tm
Net moment = 7165.18 tm
Shear check at face of pile
Maximum shear at face of pile = 2171 t

Net shear = 1882 t
av = 3.60 m
deff = 2.16 m
0.5deff = 1.081 m
2deff = 4.325 m
β = av/2d
= 0.83
Reduced shear = 1566.62 t
Transverse direction:-
SECTION MODULUS
PILE 1 4 7
ZT 28.8 28.8 28.8
ZL 27 1.00E+09 -27
SUMMARY OF FORCES FOR DESIGN OF PILE CAP IN TRANSVERSE DIRECTION:
Group I (Case-1)
559 476 394 1429
Group I (Case-2)
539 452 365 1356
Group I (Case-3)
570 487 404 1461
LWL
538 477 416 1431 CASE

523 448 373 1343

557 485 413 1456
V) 731 645 558 1934
Akshit S.Chatterjee

Transverse(+V) 773 687 601 2061
V) 727 641 554 1922
(+V) 770 683 596 2048
V) 729 643 557 1929
Transverse(+V) 772 685 599 2056
V) 713 449 185 1346
Longitudinal(+V) 755 490 226 1471
V) 711 446 182 1339
Group IV (Case-2B) Seismic LWL
Longitudinal(+V) 753 488 223 1464 CASE
V) 714 449 185 1348
Longitudinal(+V) 755 491 227 1473

488 399 310 1197

629 540 452 1621

486 397 307 1191

627 538 448 1613

489 400 311 1199

629 540 452 1621
Group I (Case-1)
618 534 451 1603
Group I (Case-2)
598 510 422 1530
Group I (Case-3)
629 545 461 1635

597 535 473 1605

582 506 430 1517

616 543 470 1629
V) 786 699 612 2097
Transverse(+V) 829 741 654 2224 HFL
Group III (Case-2A) Seismic Transverse (- CASE
V) 783 695 607 2085
(+V) 825 737 649 2211
V) 785 697 610 2092
Transverse(+V) 827 740 652 2219
V) 768 503 238 1509
Longitudinal(+V) 810 545 279 1634
V) 766 501 235 1502
Longitudinal(+V) 808 542 276 1627
Akshit S.Chatterjee
Group IV (Case-3A) Seismic Longitudinal(- ULS CONDITION

V) 769 503 238 1510
Longitudinal(+V) 810 545 280 1635

543 453 363 1359

684 595 505 1784 HFL
CASE
541 451 361 1353

682 592 502 1775

544 454 364 1362

684 595 505 1784

LEVER ARM = 1.60 m
MOMENT = 3559 tm
Lever arm = 1.25 m
Maximum shear at face of pile = 2224.23 t

Net shear = 2072.35 t
av = 1.60 m
deff = 2.16 m
0.5deff = 1.081 m
2deff = 4.325 m
β = av/2d
= 0.37
Akshit S.Chatterjee
SLS CONDITION

(Refer Design document- 4800197-GGN-DD-xxx for Pier, SLS design summary)
Group I (Case-1 service-Rare)

2898 667 1481
2841 383 1562
2843 1047 1494
Group II (Case-1 wind load-Rare)
2813 936 1267
2771 513 1327
2772 1221 1276
LWL CASE
Group III (Case-1 Service-Frequent)
2856 540 1125
2813 308 1185
2815 825 1134
Group IV (Case 1 Wind Load-Frequent)
2737 514 432
2725 273 448
Group IV (Case 3 Wind Load-Frequent) 2726 590 435

3277 691 1505
3220 408 1586
3222 1072 1518
3192 960 1291
3150 537 1351
3151 1246 1300
HFL CASE
3235 564 1149
3192 332 1210
3194 850 1159
3116 538 456
3104 298 473
Group V (Case-1- Quasi permanent) 2747 0 0 LWL CASE
Group V (Case-1- Quasi permanent) 3127 0 0 HFL CASE
No. of piles = 9
SECTION MODULUS
PILE 1 2 3 0
ZT 28.8 1E+09 -28.8 0
ZL 27 27 27 0

Group I (Case-1 service-Rare) 400 377 354 1131
Group II (Case-1 wind load-Rare) 392 360 327 1079
LWL CASE
Akshit S.Chatterjee
Group II (Case-2 wind load-Rare) 375 SLS

357CONDITION
339 1071
LWL CASE
Group III (Case-1 Service-Frequent) 378 359 340 1077
Group IV (Case 1 Wind Load-Frequent) 338 320 302 960
Group II (Case-3 wind load-Rare) 442 398 355 1195 HFL CASE
MAXIMUM SHEAR = 1259.61 t
LEVER ARM = 3.60 m
MOMENT = 4534.60 tm
3
Density of concrete = 2.50 t/m
3
Density of soil = 1.8 t/m
Downward Weight due to pile cap and cushion = 288.56 t
Lever arm = 2.25 m
SECTION MODULUS
PILE 1 4 7
ZT 28.8 28.8 28.8
ZL 27 1.00E+09 -27

Group II (Case-3 wind load-Rare) 398 350 303 1051 LWL
Group III (Case-1 Service-Frequent) 378 336 294 1008 CASE
Group II (Case-3 wind load-Rare) 442 393 345 1180 HFL
Akshit S.Chatterjee
SLS CONDITION
LEVER ARM = 1.60 m
MOMENT = 1897.02 tm
3
3
Lever arm = 1.25 m
CRACK WIDTH
V = 3127 t
Max Load on a Pile= 347 t
Long. Dir
Lever arm = 2.25 m
Moment due to S.W. & Cushion = 649 tm
Net B.M in Long. Dir = 3103 t-m
Trans. Dir
Lever arm = 1.25 m
ULS CHECK
Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-013

Detailed Engineering in Connection with Rehabilitation and Up-Gradation to
Four Laning of NH-31D from Km. 113+200 to km. 154+854 (Package-2-A) of
Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the State of West Bengal on EPC mode
Designed by: Checked by: Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
Long. Dir Trans. Dir

beff for cantiliver slab = 1.2a+b1
a = 3.6 1.6 m
b1 = 1.5 1.5 m
beff = 5.82 3.42 m
Hence it overlaps =
beff modified = 3.81 2.61 m
Max. Shear = 828.55 828.55 t
Load/m = 217.47 317.45 t/m
ULS Moment = 782.88 507.92 tm/m
Material Specification:
Concrete grade M35

Characteristic Compressive Strength of Concrete, fck Mpa 35
Concrete material factor (Уm) 1.50
Design Compressive strength of Concrete, fcd Mpa 15.63
Tensile strength of concrete , fctm Mpa 2.80
Strain at reaching Characteistic Strength, ec2 0.0020
Ultimate Strain, ecu2 0.0035
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete ( Ecm ) Gpa 32
Steel Grade Fe550

Yield Strength of Reinforcement, fy or fyk Mpa 550.00
Partial factor for steel (Уs) 1.15
Design Yield Strength of Reinforcement, fyd Mpa 478.261
Modulus of Elasticity of Steel ( Es) Gpa 200
Dry weight of Concrete KN/m³ 25
Permissible Crack Width mm 0.300
Maximum compressive stress in concrete under rare combination
fck 0.48
N/mm² 16.80
Maximum tensile stress in steel under rare combination fyk 0.6
N/mm² 330.00
STRENGTH CHECK
Pile cap
Pile cap
Sl No. Parameters Units Trans.
Long. Dir
Dir
1 MOMENT KN-M 7680 4983
2 SHEAR FORCE KN 2133 3114
MATERIAL DATA
3 Grade of Steel 550 550
4 Characteristic strength of reinf. (fyk) Mpa 550 550
5 Partial factor for steel (Уs) 1.15 1.15
6 Design value for tensile strength (fyd = fyk/Уs) Mpa 478.26 478.26
7 Modulus of Elasticity of Steel (Es) Gpa 200 200
8 Grade of Concrete 35 35
9 Charecterstic comp. strength (fck) Mpa 35 35
10 α 0.67 0.67
11 Concrete material factor (Уm) 1.50 1.50
Design value for Concrete comp. strength (fcd =
12 Mpa 15.63 15.63
αfck/Уm)
Geometric Data
13 Width of slab(b) mm 1000 1000
14 depth of Member mm 2250 2250
15 Clear Cover mm 75 75
16 Dia of reinforcement mm 25 20
17 Spacing of bars mm 80 80
20 Area of reinforcement mm² 12266 7850
21 Reinforcement (Ast/bd) 0.0057 0.0037
22 Hence Pt= (100*Ast/bd) % 0.57 0.37
23 Dia of Shear Reinforcement links mm 10 10
24 Spacing of reinforcement in other direction mm 160 160
25 number of legs Nos. 6 6
26 Reinforcement(% )
Design of Pier Cap

As per Clause 16.5.1.1 of IRC:112-2014, Min. & Max Main
Reinforcement.
27 Min. Main Reinforcement mm² 2862 2769
28 Status O.K. O.K.
29 Max. Main Reinforcement mm² 56250 56250
30 Status O.K. O.K.
Strength of section
31 Eff. depth of section (d = D-c-φ/2) mm 2163 2130
32 Depth of NA from comp. flange (x) mm 469 300
33 λ 0.80 0.80
34 η 1.00 1.00
35 Depth of stress Block (λx) mm 375 240
36 Stress on stress Block (η fcd) MPa 15.63 15.63
37 Total comp. force (Fc = λxηfcdb) KN 5866 3754
38 Total tension Force (Fs = fyd At) KN 5866 3754
39 Diff (Fc-Fs) KN 0 0
40 Depth of Lever arm (z) = d-λx/2 mm 1975 2010
41 Moment of resistance (Fc*z) KN-m 11585 7546
42 UR for pure bending 0.66 0.66
43 Status O.K. O.K.
Shear Resistance
56 Shear reduction factor, β = αv/2d
57 0.5d = mm 1081 1065
58 2d = mm 4325 4260
59 αv = m 3.600 1.600
60 β= 0.832 0.370
61 Design Shear force,Ved = kN 1776 1152
62 K = 1+sqrt(200/d)<=2 1.304 1.306
63 σcp MPa 0.000 0.000
64 ρ1=At/(bd)<=0.02 0.006 0.004
65 Vmin = 0.031*k^(3/2).fck^(1/2) KN 0.273 0.274
66 Concrete Shear Capacity Vrd.c =
KN 843 721
67 [0.12.K(80p1fck)^0.33+(0.15σcp)]bwd
68 Min. Concrete Shear Capacity Vrd.cmin =
KN 591 583
69 [Vmin+(0.15σcp)]bwd
70 Status (if 0 = reinf. Not reqd;or 1 = reinf reqd) 1. 1.

71 Design shear force (Ved) KN 1776 1152
72 Design yield strength. of shear reinf. (fywd=fyd) MPa 478.26 478.26
73 Cotθ 1.00 1.00
74 Required area of Shear reinforcement (Aws) mm²/mm 305 201
75 Nos 6 6
76 Provided area of Shear reinforcement (Aws) mm²/mm 471 471
77 shear capacity w/ vertical shear renf.(Vrd,s) KN 2741 2700
78 αcw 1.00 1.00
79 V1 0.53 0.60
80 Max. shear Capcity w/ vertical shear renf. (VRd,max) KN 8097 8991
81 Final shear Capcity (VRd) KN 2741 2700
82 UR for only shear= 0.65 0.43
83 Status O.K. O.K.
As per Clause 10.3.3.5 of IRC:112-2011, Minimum Shear Reinforcement.
84 Min. Shear Reinforcement Asw min/s mm²/mm 0.6583 0.6583

86 Spacing of reinforcement mm 160 160
87 Area of reinforcement Asw/s provided mm² 2.95 2.95
88 Status O.K. O.K.
44 Effective As long for only Bending mm² 8131 5183

45 DFtd KN 887.87 576.04
46 As long for additional tensile RF from Shear force mm² 1856 1204
47 UR for combined shear + bending 0.81 0.81
48 Status O.K. O.K.
49 Max. strain on concrete in comp. 0.0035 1.0035
50 Max. strain on reinf. in tension 0.0044 0.0044
51 Max. depth of NA From Comp. Flange mm 959 2121
52 Status (under/Reinf, Over Reinf or Bal) U/R U/R
53 fctm MPa 2.80 0.00
54 Min. reinforcement mm² 2862 2769
55 Status O.K. O.K.
*Surface Reinforcement (Cl. 16.5.4 (4)-IRC:112-2011)

Minimum Surface Reinforcement (1% of Act,ext) mm2 750 750
Dia of Reinforcement (φ) mm 16 16
Spacing of Reinforcement (s) mm 160 160
Reinforcement Provided mm /m
2
1257 1257
Design of Pier Cap

Design of Pier Cap
PUNCHING SHEAR CHECK
Detailed Engineering in Connection with Rehabilitation and Up-Gradation to Four Laning 4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No 4800197
013
of NH-31D from Km. 113+200 to km. 154+854 (Package-2-A) of Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari
section in the State of West Bengal on EPC mode Designed by: Checked by: Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee 29-11-2019
Design of Pier P5 for Ch: 123+518.5
DESIGN FOR PUNCHING SHEAR IN PILE CAP AS PER IRC : 112 - 2011
3
Density of concrete 25 KN/m
3
Density of soil 18 KN/m
Characteristic Strength, fck 35 Mpa
Design Strength of concrete, fcd 15.63 Mpa
Net Applied Force, Ved 8128 KN
Net downward force within the control perimeter, DVEd 1605.8 KN
Overall depth of pile cap 2250 mm
Effective Depth of Pile Cap, d 2130.0 mm
Reinforcement Ratio, rl 0.0046
Distance between the edge of pile to the edge of pier 2.850 < 2d
VEd,red = VEd - DVEd 6522.26 KN
n = 0.6 x [1-fck/310] 0.532
Maximum Punching Shear Resistance, nRd.max = 0.5 x n x fcd 4.16 Mpa
0.5
K = 1 + (200/d) 1.31 ≤2
1.5 0.5
nmin = 0.031 x K x (fck) 0.274 Mpa
Distance of control perimeter from column periphery, a 2.850 mm
2xd/a 1494.74
Perimeter along control line, p 7682 mm
2
Area enclosed by control line 18.23 m
nEd,red = VEd,red /(bd) 0.399 MPa
nmin x 2d/a 409.343 MPa
0.333
nRd = 0.12 x K x (80.r1.fck) x (2d/a) 547.711 MPa
HENCE, OK
SLS CHECK
4800197-GGN-DD-
Detailed Engineering in Connection with Rehabilitation and Up-Gradation Job No 4800197 013
to Four Laning of NH-31D from Km. 113+200 to km. 154+854 (Package-2-
A) of Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the State of West Bengal on EPC
mode Designed by: Checked by: Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
DESIGN OF foundation (SLS)
S.no. Refrence Unit Long Dir Long Dir
Load Data
1 Moment KN-m 38115 16747
Material Data
2 Grade of Steel Fe 550 Fe 550
3 Charecterstic strength of reinforcement (fyk) Fe 550 Fe 550
4 Partial factor for steel (γs) Cl 6.2.2,IRC 112 1.15 1.15
5 Design value for tensile strength (fyd=fyk/γs) Cl 6.2.2,IRC 112 MPa 478.26 478.26
6 Modulus of Elasticity of Steel (ES) Cl 6.2.2,IRC 112 GPa 200 200
7 Grade of Concrete M35 M35
8 Charecterstic compressive strength (fck) Table 6.5,IRC 112 MPa 35 35
9 α Cl 6.4.2.8,IRC 112 0.67 0.67
10 Concrete material factor (γm) Cl 6.4.2.8,IRC 112 1.50 1.50
Design value for concrete compressive strength (fcd=
11 αfck/γm) Cl 6.4.2.8,IRC 112 MPa 15.63 15.63
12 Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete (Ecm) Table 6.5,IRC 112 GPa 32 32
Geometric Data
13 Width of Slab/Beam (b) mm 11400 10800
14 Total depth of Slab/Beam (D) mm 2250 2250
15 Cover to Reinforcement mm 75 75
16 Dia of Reinforcement (φ) in first layer mm 25 20
18 Effective depth of beam/Slab (d) mm 2163 2130
19 Spacing of Reinforcement (s) or mm 80 80
20 Number of Bar (n) Nos 143 135
21 Area of Reinforcement (At) mm2 69950 42412
22 Reinforcement (%) 0.273 0.175
Stress Check
23 Concrete Cross Sectional Area (AC) mm2 25650000 24300000
24 Perimeter in contact with atmosphere (u) mm 27300 26100
25 Notional Size (=2AC/u) mm 1879 1862
26 Final Creep Co-efficient (φ) Table 6.9 ,IRC 112 1.50 1.50
27 Effective Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete (Eeff) Cl 6.4.2.5,IRC 112MPa 12800 12800
28 Modular ratio (m) 15.63 15.63
29 Allowable stress in Steel Cl 12.2.2,IRC 112MPa 330 330
30 Allowable stress in Concrete Cl 12.2.2,IRC 112MPa 16.80 16.80
31 Position of nuetral axis from comp. face (x) mm 555.2 453.6
32 MOA of Compression area mm2 1.76E+09 1.11E+09
33 MOA of Tension area mm2 1.76E+09 1.11E+09
34 Diff. mm2 0 0
35 MOI of cracked section mm4 3.47E+12 2.20E+12
36 Stress in tension reinf. MPa 275.554 199.553
UR 0.84 0.60
37 Status O.K. O.K.
38 Stress in concrete MPa 6.091 3.455
UR 0.36 0.21
39 Status O.K. O.K.
Document
LOUIS BERGER no.
4800197-GGN-
Detailed Engineering in Connection with Rehabilitation and Up- Job No 4800197 DD-013
Akshit S.Chatterjee
CRACK WIDTH CHECK
S.no. Refrence Unit Long Dir Trans Dir
Load Data
1 Moment KN-m 30437 1478
Material Data
3 Charecterstic strength of reinforcement (fyk) Table 18.1,IRC 112MPa 550 550
9 α Cl 6.4.2.8,IRC 112 0.67 0.67
11 Design value for concrete compressive strength (fcd= αfck/γm)
Cl 6.4.2.8,IRC 112 MPa 15.63 15.63
Geometric Data
Stress Check
25 Age at Loading days 28 28
26 Relative humidity Table 6.9 , IRC %
112 12800 12800
28 Effective Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete (Eeff) Cl 6.4.2.5,IRC 112
MPa 1924.8 1924.8
29 Modular ratio (m) 103.906 103.906
30 Allowable stress in Steel Cl 12.2.2,IRC 112
MPa 440.0 440.0
31 Allowable stress in Concrete Cl 12.2.2,IRC 112
MPa 12.60 12.60
35 Diff. mm2 0.000 0.000
Document
LOUIS BERGER no.
4800197-GGN-
Akshit S.Chatterjee
37 Stress in tension reinf. ssc MPa 244.161 19.292

38 Status O.K. O.K.
40 Status O.K. O.K.
CALCULATION FOR CRACK WIDTH FOR BENDING As per 12.3.4 of IRC 112-2011
41 Wk = Sr,max (esm-ecm)
42 ae = Es/Ecm 6.25 6.25
43 depth hc,eff mm 218.8 300.0
44 Eff area of conc in tension surrounding reinf Ac,eff mm2 2493750 3240000
45 Rr,eff 0.0280 0.0131
46 fctm Mpa 2.800 2.800
47 fct,eff Mpa 2.800 2.800
48 kt 1.500 1.500
49 (esm-ecm)= {ssc - kt(fct,eff/Rr,eff)(1+aeRr,eff)}/Es 0.0003 -0.0016
50 0.6*ssc/Ec 0.0007 0.0001
51 (esm-ecm) 0.0007 0.0001
52 K1 0.80 0.80
53 K2 0.50 0.50
54 Minimum clear cover c 75.00 75.00
55 Srmax = 3.4c+0.425k1k2f/Rreff 407 515
56 Wk = Sr,max (esm-ecm) 0.298 0.030
57 Allowable crack width 0.300 1.300
58 UR 0.99 0.02
59 Status O.K. O.K.
Detailed Engineering Consultancy Services for Rehabiliation and
154.854 (Package-II A) Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the state of
West Bengal
Pier-P7 for Major Bridge at chainage - 123+518.5

(This design is applicable for Pier P1, P2, P6, P8, P9 and P10 also)
Pier_P7_9.6m_12piles
Content
1 Input, Load Calculations, Design forces
2 Pier Section Design
3 Pile Base Pressure Check
4 Pile SLS check
5 Pile ULS Check
6 Pile Structural Desgin
Annex _I Confinement RF
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
1 Inputs:
16.00 Traffic
Direction
FRL 0.00%
+67.378
45.69m span 45.69 m span
2.40 4.1m
Top of pier 0.75

+64.528
cap
6.4m
8.378
GL 55.98
55.40
2.83
2.25
53.15
Finished Road Level (FRL) at the centre of Pier = 67.378 m
Pile cap bottom level / Founding level = 53.15 m
Max depth of scour For Pier from FSL (Ref: ANNEXURE-I)

= 13.38 m
Super Structure

Super structure Depth = 2.40 m
Crash barrier Height = 1.00 m
Wearing Coat thickness = 0.1 m

Sub Structure
Depth of Bearing + Pedestal = 0.35 m
Pier Cap Top Level = +64.528 m =+67.378-0.1-2.40-0.35 - cross slope
Pier cap - Length along the Traffic = 4.1 m
Pier cap - Length across the Traffic = 12.9 m
Pier cap - Overall Depth = 0.75 m
Centre to centre of bearing (Transverse) = 4.10 m
Centre to centre of bearing (Longitudinal) = 2.40 m
Height of sloping portion of piercap = 0.75 m
Existing GL = 55.98 m
Height of Pier from top of Pile Cap = 9.13 m =+64.528-55.400
Height of Pier below GL = 0.58 m
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
Design height of pier = 9.20 m
Dimension of Pier along traffic = 1.80 m
Dimension of Pier across traffic = 6.40 m LWL (RL) = +55.98
Scour level HFL = +47.77 m Scour level HFL-S = 49.10
HFL (RL) = +61.15 m Scour level LWL-S = 50.44
Max depth of scour = 13.38 m from HFL
Foundation
Pile - Diameter = 1.5 m Type of Foundation = PILE
No of Pile = 12.0 Nos
Pile cap/Footing -Along Traffic Direction = 10.8 m
Pile cap /Footing -Across Traffic Direction = 15.3 m
Pile cap - Depth = 2.3 m Footing depth at tip = 2.25 m
Min Thickness of soil above pile cap = 0.6 m offset from pier = 0 mm
Materials Modulur ratio = 10
Unit weight of PSC = 25 kN/m3
Unit weight of RCC = 25 kN/m3
Unit weight of Wearing course = 22 kN/m3
Unit weight of Soil fill = 20 kN/m3
Grade of Concrete for Pier = 35 N/mm²
Grade of Concrete for Piles (or Open Foundation) = 35 N/mm²
Grade of Steel used = 550 N/mm²
Load Calculation
1.1 Dead Load
1.1.1 SuperStructure
Load from Span 1
Total Weight = (360.2)×25.0 DL Extra Factor 1.05
Reaction on Bearing(Outer bearing) = 6338 kN
Load from Span 2

Total Weight = =(360.2)×25.0
Reaction on Bearing(Inner bearing) = 6338 kN
Total reaction on pier from two spans 12676 kN

=
ML due to different spans 0 kN-m
=
Transverse moment = 0 kN-m
Total SIDL
Reaction (Outer Bearing) = 1268 kN
Reaction (Inner Bearing) = 1268 kN
Fixed SIDL ( crash barrier+services)

Reaction ( outer bearing ) = 514.0 kN
Reaction (Inner bearing) = 514.0 kN
Variable SIDL(Wearing coat+future overlay)

Reaction (Outer bearing) = 753.9 kN
Reaction (Inner Bearing ) = 753.9 kN
Total reaction due to SIDL(Wearing coat) = 1508 kN
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
1.2 Live Load
1.2.1 Governing Load cases for Live Load
Case 1 (Maximum Axial Force case) Without any reduction factor

Case 2 (Maximum Longitudinal Moment case)-

Case 3 (Maximum Transverse Moment case)

1.3 Longitudinal Forces (Braking Force & Friction Force)
1.3.1 70R
Braking Force
No.of vehicles on span = 1 nos.

Total Live load of 1L 70R = 1000 kN 1L Class A 554 kN
For Contribution of B.F = 20% of First Train + 10% of Second train
Contribution of B.F (Fh) (In Normal case) = 318 kN Contribution of B.F (Fh) (In Trans Seis case)
Contribution of B.F (Fh) (Max Possible in Long Seis case) = 0 kN 64 kN
Friction Force
Left side Right side
S.No Description \ Type of Pier P1 P2 P3 P4

Fx Free
1 DL Rxn on free end (input value) 6338 6338 0 Put Max R only for EJ or FR pier.
2 SIDL on free end (input value) 1268 1268 0
Coefficient of Friction 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
Frictional force due to DL + SIDL 380 380 0 0
3 LL Reaction Without any reduction factor 2520 2520 0 0

Frictional force due to LL 126 126 0 0
Live Load Lane reduction factor to be
taken = 1.0 LL factor on Seismic = 0.2
Normal Case Trans Seismic Case
Fixed Bearing max of:
Fh-u(Rg+Rq) -189 kN -342 kN
Fh/2+u(Rg+Rq) 665 kN 437.256765 kN
Free bearing
u(Rg+Rq) 506 kN 405
Total Horizontal force normal 1171 kN
Design Longitudinal Force

= 1171 kN 843 kN
(B.F & F.F) - Service
Design Longitudinal Force - seismic = 0 kN DesignTransverse Force - seismic
Design Longitudinal Force - seismic
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
1.4 Seismic force
Calculation of Seismic coefficients
 Z   Sa 
   g 
 2   
Ah 
 R 
 
 I 
Importance factor , I = 1.20
Zone Factor, Z (for Zone II) = 0.36
Response reduction factor, R Long- direction = 3.00
Response reduction factor, R Trans - direction = 3.00
Fundamental natural period
D
T 2 (Annexure D , IRC:6-2017)
1000 F
D= Appropriate dead load of the superstructure and live load in kN
F = Horizontal force in kN required to be applied at the centre of mass of the superstructure for one mm
horizontal deflection at the top of the pier for the earthquake in the transverse direction
and the force to be applied at the top of the bearings for the earthquake in the longitudinal direction
1.4.1 Calculation of Stiffness
Pier
Dimension of Pier - Longitudinal direction = 1.80 m
Dimension of Pier - Transverse direction = 6.40 m
Pier - design height = 9.20 m
Height of the C.G of Superstructure from soffit (DL+SIDL) (h) = 1.38 m
4
M.I in longitudinal direction IL (0.75 Cracked MOI) = 2.333 m =(6.40×1.80^3)/12
4
M.I in transverse direction IT (0.75 Cracked MOI) = 29.491 m =(1.80×6.40^3)/12
Modulus of elasticity of concrete E = 32000 N/mm2 (IRC:112-2011 Table 6.5)
Stiffness in trans direction K1T = 3EI/H3
=6×32000×1000×29.491/((9.55^2)×((3×(1.38))+(2
= 2167624 kN/m
×9.55)))
Stiffness - Longitudinal (3EIL/L3) K1L = 257122 kN/m =3×32000×1000×2.333/(9.55)^3

Height taken for the calculation (H) upto bearing top = 9.55 m
(H of shortest pier in the group)
Piles
Pile - Diameter = 1.50 m
Pile - Length ( L1+Lf) = 13.9 m
Number of pile per pier location "n" = 12 Nos.

4
Moment of inertia of one pile (I) = 0.2485 m =(3.142×(1.50)^4)/64
Young's modulus of elasticity of concrete E
(IRC:112-2011 Table 6.5)
= 32000 N/mm2
Stiffness of one pile k= 12EI / L3 = 35652 kN/m =(12×32000×1000×0.2485/(13.89)^3)
Stiffness of pile group = nk = 427825 kN/m =12×35652
Stiffness in trans direction K2T = 427825 kN/m
Stiffness in Long direction K2L = 427825 kN/m
Total Stiffness
Stiffness " k " = 1/(1/k1+1/k2)
Stiffness in Longitudinal direction "KL" = =1/(1/257122+1/427825)
= 160601 kN/m
= 160.60 kN/mm 257.1216373
Stiffness in transverse direction "KT" = 1/(1/2167624+1/427825)
= 357304 kN/m
= 357.30 kN/mm 2167.624218
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
1.4.2 Calculation of Seismic coefficient in the Longitudinal direction
S.No Description DL SIDL

1 Left bearing 6338 1268
2 Right Bearing 6338 1268
3 Free Pier 0 0
4 Right EJ Pier 0 0
Sub total 12676 2536
Total Load 15212 kN (=12676+2536)
D = 15212 kN
T = 0.486 (eq-1)
Sa/g = 2.500 2.50 for square pier link with this
= 2.500 for wall type pier full Sa/g considered
Horizontal accelaration longitudinal " AhL " = (Sa/g)*(Z/2)/(R/I)
= 0.180 =(0.36/2)×(2.500)/(3.00/1.20)
1.4.3 Calculation of Seismic coefficient in the Transverse direction
S.No Description Load (kN) Remark
1 Dead Load 12676 1.1

2 SIDL 2536 1.1.2
3 Live Load 504 Refer 1.2.1
5 Pier(50%) 0
Total Seismic load (D) 15716
T = 0.170 (eq-1)
Sa/g = 2.500
Horizontal acceleration Transverse " AhT " = (Sa/g)*(Z/2)/(R/I)
= 0.180 (=(0.36/2)×2.500/(3.00/1.20))
1.5 Centrifugal force

C = (WV2)/(127R)
Max Reaction case load = 2520 kN
Max Longitudinal case load = 1808 kN
Max transverse case load = 1628 kN
Design Speed " V " = 0.00 km/hr
Radius of curve " R " = 460 m
Centrifugal force
C.F -max reaction = 0 kN =2520×0×0/(127x460)
C.F-max longitudinal case = 0 kN =1808×0×0/(127x460)
C.F-max transverse case = 0 kN =1628×0×0/(127x460)
1.6 Wind Load

Ht. of Parapet (From C/S) = 1.00 m
Ht. of parapet from GL = 12.38
For height of 12.375m as per IRC:6-2017, Table:4 wind pressure is as below,
Table:4 wind pressure is for basic wind speed 33m/s

Assume Terrain without Obstructions
Wind speed in Delhi location = 36 m/s

(As per IS:875-Part3)
H (m) Pressure
At vehicle top 14.38 603
At parapet top 12.38 579
At girder bot. 8.98 552
2
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
I) For Superstructure (as per Cl.209.3.3 of IRC:6-2017)
Gust Factor (G) for spans upto 150m = 2.0

Drag Coefficient (CD) = 2(1+c/20d) 2.210344828 = 1.3
Where, c= c/c distance of adjacent girders & d=depth of windward girder
2
Exposed area of superstructure (A1) 45.69 155.346 = 155 m
Transverse wind load (FT) = Pz x A1 x G x CD
= 314 kN
Width of Superstructure = 16.0 m

2
Plan Area (A3) 731.04 = 731 m
Lift Coefficient (CL) = 0.75
Vertical wind load (FV) = Pz x A3 x G x CL
(-ve sign indicates upward direction of wind force) = -853 kN

CG of wind load on Superstructure above bearing = 1.70 m
II) For Live load (as per Cl.209.3.3 of IRC:6-2017)
Gust Factor (G) = 2.0

Height of Vehicle = 3.0 m
Exposed ht. of vehicle = 2.00 m
For a height of 14.375m

2
a) Max. Reaction case

2
b) Max. long. moment case

2
c) Max. trans. moment case

2
Exposed area of Vehicle 54.828 = 91.4 m
CG of wind load due to Live load above bearing = 4.35 m
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
III) For Substructure (as per Cl.209.4 of IRC:6-2017)
h/b = 1.35
d/b = 0.281
2
Exposed area of substructure (A1) = 17 m
2
Transverse wind load (FT) Pz x A1 x G x CD = 59 kN
h/b = 4.79
d/b = 3.556
Drag Coefficient (CD) 1.579166667 = 1.14
2
Exposed area of substructure (A1) = 91.8 m
2
1.9 Horizontal Force due to Water Current:

Average velocity of flow (Ref:Annexure-v) V = 3 m/sec
Lowest Bed level (As per hydrologycal data) = 55.975 m

say = 55.975 m
High Flood level = 61.15 m
Height of the pier exposed to water pressure - HFL condition = 5.75

Height of the pier exposed to water pressure - LWL condition = 0.58
Component of maximum velocity in lateral direction =(2)^0.5×3 = 4.24 m/sec
Width of the pier perpendicular to the direction of water flow = 1.80 m
Width of the Pile cap perpendicular to the direction of water flow = 10.80 m
Width of the pier parellal to the direction of water flow = 6.40 m
Width of the Pile cap parellal to the direction of water flow = 15.30 m
Intensity of pressure due to water P = 52KV2

Constant K depends on the shape - For pier & footings K = 0.66
Intensity of pressure =52×0.66×4.24^2 = 617.8 kg/m2
=617.76×9.81/1000 = 6.1 kN/m2
Variation of force due to water current over pier
Variation of velocity with depth (at HFL -S) (at HFL -N)
(at HFL) 6.06 6.06 kN/m2
HFL
13.4 5.75
3.17 3.46 kN/m2 Pier bottom
2.04 12.04 2.44 kN/m2 Pile bottom
SCOUR LEVEL
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
Lateral
intensity
HFL 6.1 0.940 =6.1×0.940 5.69 0.342 =6.1×0.342 2.07


on pier 46.25 3.134 144.949 - -

Transverse
on pile cap 67.33 - - 1.190 329.11
1.189804147

Longitudinal Moment at
Force long
Direction Component
on pier 59.85 3.1343 187.581 - -

Longitudinal
on pile cap 34.72 - - 1.19 363.55
1.189804147
HFL - SEISMIC CASE

degree to20
be considered
Lateral
intensity
HFL 6.1 0.940 =6.1×0.940 5.69 0.342 =6.1×0.342 2.07

on pier 44.84 3.172 142.259 - -
Transverse
on pier cap 59.43 - - 1.207 314.87
1.206569026
Force long Longitudinal Moment at

Direction Component
on pier 58.03 3.172 184.100 - -
Longitudinal
on pier cap 30.65 - - 1.21 351.65
1.206569026
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
1.10 Buoyancy : HFL
Upto pier level Volume of water displaced 66.2 m^3


bottom / fdn
Buoyancy : LWL
Volume of water displaced 6.6 m^3

Upto pier level

bottom
1.51 Summary of Loads at the Top of Pier cap

(kN) HT HL eT eL MT ML
1 D.L (Superstructure ) 12676 0 0 0 0 0 0
D.S.S 0
2 S.I.D.L- Fixed 1028 0 0 0 0 0 0
S.I.D.L- variable 1508 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Live Load
L.L (Case 1-Max P) 2520 0 0 0.00 0.00 2395 1162
L.L (Case 2-Max ML) 1808 0 0 0.00 0.00 1718 2169
L.L (Case 3 - Max MT) 1628 0 0 0.00 0.00 6358 1170
L.L (-Max P) -60 91 0 4.050 0 367 0
L.L ( Max ML) -43 65 0 4.050 0 264 0
L.L (- Max MT) -39 59 0 4.050 0 237 0
5.1.4 Substructure
5.2.3 Substructure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 Centrifugal Force
Max P 0 0 0 4.05 0 0 0
Max ML 0 0 0 4.05 0 0 0
Max MT 0 0 0 4.05 0 0 0
7 Wind Load
Live load max Transverse case 0 277 69 4.35 4.35 1205 301
8 Buoyancy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 Water Current 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
1.52 Load Combination at the Top of Pier cap for ULS condition

(kN)
HT HL MT ML
1 Group I (Case-1) 23396 532 1890 4538 2426
2 Group I (Case-2) 22541 283 1828 2641 3363
3 Group I (Case-3) 22570 532 1890 10248 2611
Refer Annexure
1.53 Load Combination at the Top of Pier cap for SLS condition

(kN)
HT HL MT ML
8 Group III (Case-2 Service-Frequent) 16172 157 918 1353 1689 Refer Annexure
13 Group V (Case-1- Quasi permanent) 15513 0 0 0 0
1.54 Dead Load - Substructure

12.90 4.10
4.1 m
W1
0.750
0.750
W2 Traffic Direction
7.13
W3
6.40 1.80
0.58
2.25 m
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
Load of Pier
W2 Area of flared portion (top) = 52.89 m2 Pedestal :
Area of flared portion (bot.) = 29.52 m2 Width = 1.100 m
Height of flared portion = 0.75 m Length = 1.100 m
Volume of flared portion = 30.5 m3 P (KN) e (m) from Pier Base
CG of the flared portion from top of straight
= 0.42 m 762.02 8.12
portion of pier
W3 Width = 6.40 m
Breadth = 1.80 m
Area of c/s of straight portion = 11.520 m2
Total Height of straight portion = 7.70 m =9.20-0.75-0.75
Volume of straight portion = 88.704 m3 P (KN) e (m) from Pier Base
2217.6 3.85
W1 Pier Cap
Length of pier cap = 12.90 m
Width of pier cap = 4.1 m
Avg.Thickness of pier cap = 0.75 m P (KN) e (m) from Pier Base
Volume of pier cap = 39.6675 m3 991.6875 8.825
Self wt of pier + pier cap = 3971 kN

Combined 3971 5.911
1.55 Summary of Load at the Pile Cap Top
Height of the pier = 9.200 m

(kN)
HT HL eT eL MT ML
D.S.S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 S.I.D.L- Fixed 1028 0 0 0 0 0 0
S.I.D.L- variable 1508 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Live Load
L.L (Case 1- Max P) 2520 0 0 0 0 2395 1162
L.L (Case 2 - Max ML) 1808 0 0 0 0 1718 2169
L.L (Case 3 - MT) 1628 0 0 0 0 6358 1170
L.L (Case 1-Max P) -60 91 0 13.25 0 1202 0
L.L (Case 2 - Max ML) -43 65 0 13.25 0 862 0
L.L (Case 3 - Max MT) -39 59 0 13.25 0 777 0
5.1.4 Substructure -477 715 0 5.91 0 4225 0
5.2.3 Substructure -477 0 715 0.00 5.91 0 4225
6 Centrifugal Force
Max P 0 0 0 13.25 0 0 0
Max ML 0 0 0 13.25 0 0 0
Max MT 0 0 0 13.25 0 0 0
7 Wind Load
Live load max transverse case 0 277 69 12.95 12.95 3589 897
On substructure 0 59 163 4.60 4.60 271 751
8 Vehicle Collision Load
Longitudinal - Main Component 0 0 1000 0 2.1 0 2075
Transverse - Main Component 0 500 0 3.58 0 1788 0
Longitudinal - Residual Component 0 0 500 0 2.1 0 1038
Transverse - Residual Component 0 250 0 3.58 0 894 0
8 Construction Load
8.1 L.G. Case 1 (Max 'P') 0 0 0.00 9.20 9.20 0 0
8.2 L.G. Case 2 (Max 'ML') 0 0 0 9.20 9.20 0 0
8.3 L.G. Case 3 (Max 'MT') 0 0 0 9.20 9.20 0 0
8.4 Dead Load of Superstructure 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
8.5 Dead Load of Substructure 3971 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
8.6 Seismic Load Superstructure 0 0 0 10.51 0.00 0 0
8.7 Seismic Load Substructure 0 0 0 5.91 0.00 0 0
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
Newly added 8 Water current

LWL Normal/Seismic
HFL Normal 46 59.8 145 187.6
9 Buyoyancy
HFL Normal -662
HFL-seismic -662
10 Hydrodynamic
LWL Seismic 1 1 0 0
HFL Seismic 19 19 46 46

1.1 (0.3L+T-0.3V) Max. P -709 3544 1036 35047 9112
1.2 (0.3L+T+0.3V) Max. P 709 3544 1036 35047 9112
1.3 (0.3L+T-0.3V) Max ML -704 3518 1036 34708 9112
1.4 (0.3L+T+0.3V) Max ML 704 3518 1036 34708 9112
1.5 (0.3L+T-0.3V) Max MT -702 3512 1036 34622 9112
1.6 (0.3L+T+0.3V) Max MT 702 3512 1036 34622 9112
2.1 (L+0.3T-0.3V) Max. P -691 1063 3453 10514 30375
2.2 (L+0.3T+0.3V) Max. P 691 1063 3453 10514 30375
2.3 (L+0.3T-0.3V) Max ML -691 1055 3453 10412 30375
2.4 (L+0.3T+0.3V) Max ML 691 1055 3453 10412 30375
2.5 (L+0.3T-0.3V) Max MT -691 1053 3453 10387 30375
2.6 (L+0.3T+0.3V) Max MT 691 1053 3453 10387 30375
3.1 (0.3L+0.3T-V) Max. P -2362 1063 1036 10514 9112
3.2 (0.3L+0.3T+V) Max. P 2362 1063 1036 10514 9112
3.3 (0.3L+0.3T-V) Max ML -2345 1055 1036 10412 9112
3.4 (0.3L+0.3T+V) Max ML 2345 1055 1036 10412 9112
3.5 (0.3L+0.3T-V) Max MT -2341 1053 1036 10387 9112
3.6 (0.3L+0.3T+V) Max MT 2341 1053 1036 10387 9112
1.57 Load Combination at the Top of Pile cap - SLS
LWL - Case
Moment Resultant
P Horizontal Force (kN) Moment (kN-m) kNm
(kN)
HT HL MT ML
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
HFL - Case

P
(kN) HT HL MT ML

1.58 Load Combination at the Top of Pile cap - ULS

LWL- Case
(kN) HT HL MT ML
1 Group I (Case-1) 28747 585 2037 9528 20454 22564
2 Group I (Case-2) 27893 336 2037 5486 21662 22345
3 Group I (Case-3) 27921 585 2037 15237 20639 25654
Refer Annexure

10 25668 5278 1723 52337 16253 54802
(+V)

13 25801 1595 5180 16155 45748 48517
V)
14 27893 5277 1555 52445 13855 54244
Longitudinal(+V)
15 25687 1583 5180 15893 45909 48582
V)
16 27759 1583 5180 15893 45909 48582
Longitudinal(+V)
17 25691 1581 5180 16724 45773 48732
V)
18 27763 1581 5180 16724 45773 48732
Longitudinal(+V)
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
HFL- Case
P kNm
(kN) HT HL MT ML
1 Group I (Case-1) 28658 631 2097 9673 20641 22795
2 Group I (Case-2) 27803 382 2097 5631 21849 22563
3 Group I (Case-3) 27832 631 2097 15382 20826 25891
7 Group III (Case-1A) Seismic Transverse(-V) 25179 5379 1786 53143 16290 55583 Refer annex

10 27183 5341 1786 52525 16451 55041
(+V)

13 25206 1645 5256 16311 45978 48786
V)
14 27297 5328 1631 52601 14085 54454
Longitudinal(+V)
15 25092 1634 5256 16049 46139 48851
V)
16 27164 1634 5256 16049 46139 48851
Longitudinal(+V)
17 25096 1631 5256 16881 46003 49002
V)
18 27167 1631 5256 16881 46003 49002
Longitudinal(+V)
11.52 165
1.60 Summary of Load at pile cap bottom Footing 372
Depth of pile cap /Open foundation = 2.25 W1 9295 e1 1.125
Height from Piercap Top = 11.45 m W2 0 e2 2.250
Dead load of the Pier at this level = 3971 kN Soil W3 1768 e3 2.54
Dead load of the pile cap = 9295 kN W= 11063 e= 1.351
0.000
2.83
0.6 e3
Wt of soil 1768 KN e2
Wt of water from GL to HFL acting on Footing 7947 KN e1
buyoyancy on soil 884 KN
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
Pier +Piercap 3971 e11 = 8.161
Total weight to be used for seismic in foundation 9295 KN Sub+Fdn 15034 3.3895
(Only for exposed pile cap, Zero in case of embedded Open foundation or pile cap)

(kN)
HT HL eT eL MT ML
D.S.S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 S.I.D.L- Fixed 1028 0 0 0 0 0 0
S.I.D.L- variable 1508 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Live Load
L.L (Case 1-Max P) 2520 0 0 0 0 2395 1162
L.L (Case 2 - Max ML) 1808 0 0 0 0 1718 2169
L.L (Case 3 - Max MT) 1628 0 0 0 0 6358 1170
4 Longitudinal Forces (additional vertical force is neglected) *** HL in trans seismic is not shown here. Cell H679 linked separately in Annex tables
L.L (Case 1-Max P) -60 91 0 15.50 0 1406 0
L.L (Case 2 - Max ML) -43 65 0 15.50 0 1009 0
L.L (Case 3 - Max MT) -39 59 0 15.50 0 909 0
5.1.4 Substructure + Foundation -1592 2388 0 3.39 0 8094 0
5.2 Seismic Force (Longitudianal)
5.2.3 Substructure + Foundation -1592 0 2388 0 3.39 0 8094
6 Centrifugal Force
Max P 0 0 0 15.50 0 0 0
Max ML 0 0 0 15.50 0 0 0
Max MT 0 0 0 15.50 0 0 0
7 Wind Load
Live load max transverse case 0 277.12 69 15.20 15.20 4212 1053
On substructure 0 59 163 6.85 6.85 404 1119
8 Construction Load
8.1 L.G. Case 1 (Max 'P') 0 0 0 11.45 11.45 0 0
8.2 L.G. Case 2 (Max 'ML') 0 0 0 11.45 11.45 0 0
8.3 L.G. Case 3 (Max 'MT') 0 0 0 11.45 11.45 0 0
8.4 Dead Load of the Superstructure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8.5 Dead Load of the Substructure 13266 0 0 0 0 0 0
8.6 Seismic Load of Superstructure 0 0 0 12.76 0.00 0 0
8.7 Seismic Load of Substructure 0 0 0 8.16 0.00 0 0
8 Water current
LWL Normal/Seismic
HFL Normal 114 94.6 329 363.5
HFL-seismic 104 89 315 352
9 Buyoyancy
HFL Normal -5264
HFL-seismic -5264
10 Hydrodynamic
LWL Seismic 143 286 139 277
HFL Seismic 152 295 217 355
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
1.1 (0.3L+T-0.3V) Max. P -1043 5217 1538 45280 12121
1.2 (0.3L+T+0.3V) Max. P 1043 5217 1538 45280 12121
1.3 (0.3L+T-0.3V) Max ML -1038 5191 1538 44883 12121
1.4 (0.3L+T+0.3V) Max ML 1038 5191 1538 44883 12121
1.5 (0.3L+T-0.3V) Max MT -1037 5185 1538 44783 12121
1.6 (0.3L+T+0.3V) Max MT 1037 5185 1538 44783 12121
2.1 (L+0.3T-0.3V) Max. P -1025 1565 5126 13584 40404
2.2 (L+0.3T+0.3V) Max. P 1025 1565 5126 13584 40404
2.3 (L+0.3T-0.3V) Max ML -1025 1557 5126 13465 40404
2.4 (L+0.3T+0.3V) Max ML 1025 1557 5126 13465 40404
2.5 (L+0.3T-0.3V) Max MT -1025 1555 5126 13435 40404
2.6 (L+0.3T+0.3V) Max MT 1025 1555 5126 13435 40404
3.1 (0.3L+0.3T-V) Max. P -3478 1565 1538 13584 12121
3.2 (0.3L+0.3T+V) Max. P 3478 1565 1538 13584 12121
3.3 (0.3L+0.3T-V) Max ML -3461 1557 1538 13465 12121
3.4 (0.3L+0.3T+V) Max ML 3461 1557 1538 13465 12121
3.5 (0.3L+0.3T-V) Max MT -3456 1555 1538 13435 12121
3.6 (0.3L+0.3T+V) Max MT 3456 1555 1538 13435 12121
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
1.62 Summary of Load at pile cap bottom at SLS condition
LWL - Case
Moment (kN-m)
P kNm
(kN)
HT HL MT ML

HFL - Case
Moment (kN-m)
P kNm
(kN)
HT HL MT ML
7 Group III (Case-1 Service-Frequent) 38791 439 1129 6194 13044 14440 Remark
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
1.63 Summary of Load for Base Pressure at pile cap bottom

LWL- Case
P
(kN) HT HL MT ML
1 Group I (Case-1) 27594 0 1171 1916 14753 14876
2 Group I (Case-2) 27024 0 1171 1374 15558 15618
3 Group I (Case-3) 27043 0 1171 5722 14876 15938
8 Group III (Case-1B) Seismic Transverse(+V) 27389 7186 3005 61651 26577 67136 Refer Annexure

10 27268 7151 3005 61006 26738 66609
(+V)

13 24597 2156 7206 18764 55008 58120
V)
14 27365 2156 7206 18764 55008 58120
Longitudinal(+V)
15 24483 2145 7206 18494 6164 19494
V)
16 27251 2145 7206 18494 55169 58186
Longitudinal(+V)
17 24487 2143 7206 19323 55033 58327
V)
18 27255 2143 7206 19323 55033 58327
Longitudinal(+V)
HFL- Case
Moment (kN-m)
P kNm
(kN)
HT HL MT ML
1 Group I (Case-1) 34945 114 1266 2245 15116 15282
2 Group I (Case-2) 34376 114 1266 1703 15921 16012
3 Group I (Case-3) 34395 114 1266 6051 15239 16397
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee

10 34620 7264 3096 61399 27113 67119
(+V)

13 31949 2263 7304 19102 55437 58636
V)
14 34717 2263 7304 19102 55437 58636
Longitudinal(+V)
15 31835 2252 7304 18833 6593 19953
V)
16 34603 2252 7304 18833 55598 58701
Longitudinal(+V)
17 31838 2250 7304 19662 55462 58844
V)
18 34606 2250 7304 19662 55462 58844
Longitudinal(+V)
1.64 Summary of Load at pile cap bottom at ULS condition
LWL- CASE

(kN) HT HL MT ML
1 Group I (Case-1) 42991 585 2037 10844 25037 27285
2 Group I (Case-2) 42137 336 2037 6241 26245 26977
3 Group I (Case-3) 42166 585 2037 16554 25222 30169
10 39158 10655 3368 91302 26964 95201
(+V)
Refer Annexure
13 35094 3212 10666 27933 82280 86892
V)
14 39246 3212 10666 27933 82280 86892
Longitudinal(+V)
15 34980 3196 10666 27583 82441 86933
V)
16 39132 3196 10666 27583 82441 86933
Longitudinal(+V)
17 34984 3193 10666 28392 82305 87064
V)
18 39136 3193 10666 28392 82305 87064
Longitudinal(+V)
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-013
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
HFL - CASE

(kN) HT HL MT ML kNm
1 Group I (Case-1) 53631 699 2132 11174 25401 27750
2 Group I (Case-2) 52776 449 2132 6570 26609 27408
3 Group I (Case-3) 52805 699 2132 16883 25586 30654

10 49292 10768 3460 91695 27339 95684
(+V)
Refer Annexure
13 45227 3319 10764 28271 82710 87408
V)

14 49379 3319 10764 28271 82710 87408
Longitudinal(+V)

15 45113 3303 10764 27921 82871 87448
V)
16 49265 3303 10764 27921 82871 87448
Longitudinal(+V)

17 45117 3300 10764 28730 82734 87581
V)
18 49269 3300 10764 28730 82734 87581
Longitudinal(+V)

Job No. 4800197
to KM 154.854 (Package-II A) Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section
in the state of West Bengal Date

Akshit S.Chatterjee

H.F.L. = 55.975 m Pier cap 0.000
Pier cap bottom level = 63.778 m Pier shaft 0.575
Pier shaft bottom level = 55.400 m Pile cap 2.250
pile cap
radius of
enveloping circle
circle
15.3
1.80 10.8
Dimension of pier shaft transverse direction 1.80

Dimension of pier shaft long direction 1.80
Dimension of Pile cap in transverse direction 15.3

Dimension of Pile cap in long direction 10.8
enveloping circle
W e : weight of the enveloping cylinder in Kg
Design of Pier

Job No. 4800197
to KM 154.854 (Package-II A) Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section
in the state of West Bengal Date

Akshit S.Chatterjee
Long Seismic
(m) (m) (t) (long) (kN)
Pier Shaft 0.575 0.900 0.639 0.39 1.463 0.18 1.008
Pile Cap 2.25 7.650 0.294 0.39 415.134 0.18 285.887


radius of
enveloping circle
circle
10.8
1.8 15.3
(m) (m) (t) (trans) (kN)
Pier Shaft 0.575 0.900 0.639 0.39 1.463 0.18 1.008
Pile Cap 2.25 5.400 0.417 0.39 207.583 0.18 142.955

Design of Pier

Job No. 4800197

Akshit S.Chatterjee

(REFER: IS1893-3-Cl 11 )
H.F.L. = 61.145 m Pier cap 0.000 m
Pier cap bottom level = 63.778 m Pier shaft 5.745 m
Pier shaft bottom level = 55.400 m Pile cap 2.250 m
pile cap
radius of
enveloping circle
circle
15.3
1.80 10.8
Dimension of pier shaft transverse direction 1.80 m

Dimension of pier shaft long direction 1.80 m
Dimension of Pile cap in transverse direction 15.3 m

Dimension of Pile cap in long direction 10.8 m
enveloping circle
We : weight of the enveloping cylinder in Kg
Long Seismic
(m) (m) (t) (long) (kN) (kN-m)
Pier Shaft 5.745 0.900 6.383 0.73 14.619 0.18 18.845 46.401
Pile Cap 2.25 7.650 0.294 0.39 428.290 0.18 294.947 355.062

Job No. 4800197

Akshit S.Chatterjee


radius of
enveloping circle
circle
10.8
1.8 15.3
(m) (m) (t) (trans) (kN) (kN-m)
Pier Shaft 5.745 0.900 6.383 0.73 14.619 0.18 18.845 46.401
Pile Cap 2.25 5.400 0.417 0.39 220.739 0.18 152.015 217.224



Akshit S.Chatterjee
2.0 Pier - Section Design
Pier Section
Reinforcement Details
Dia of bar provided trans direction 52 nos 32 dia at each face

Dia of bar provided long direction 25 nos 25 dia at each face
Total Area 108131 mm^2


Akshit S.Chatterjee
ULS Section capacity check
UR 0.78 OK


Akshit S.Chatterjee
Shear Capacity due to concrete
Shear capacity of concrete is more than longitudnal shear force
SLS - stress check
Rare - critical combination
Limit
Stress in concrete 5.4 Mpa 16.8 Mpa ok
Stress in Steel 31.1 Mpa 440 Mpa ok


Akshit S.Chatterjee
Crack width - critical combination
As QP moments are less than cracking moments of section, therforcesection remains uncracked
Limit
Minimum Reinforcment for Pier
Vertical Reinforcement
Dia of vertical bars should not be less than 12 mm OK
Area of minimum RF provided should be greater of .1 Ned/fyd or .002Ac

6352.386 23040
Provided Ast 108130.61 OK
Transverse Reinforcement
Spacing Dia
Provided in Drawing 150 mm OK 12 mm OK
spacing of transverse RF should not be more than dia should not be less than
384 mm 8 mm
1800 mm 8 mm
200 mm
Shear Capapcity of pier (concrete)
bw 6400 mm Vz 5256 kN
deff 1740.00 mm N 22609705.65 N
Fck 35 Mpa Ac 11136000 mm^2
Asl 108131 mm^2 N/Ac 2.030325579 ok
P1 0.00971
K 1.33903 ok 0.2fcd 3.12
Vrdc 8713.1 kN
Vmin 3164.54 kN Vrdc ok
Shear force is less than shear capacity of concrete hence no shear RF required
26

Akshit S.Chatterjee
Design of Pile Foundation - Base Pressure
No. of piles = 12 A ML
Column and C.G of Pile = 0.00 m
10.8
cap = 2.25 m
Pile offset from edge = 0.15 m -4.5, 6.75 0, 6.75 4.5, 6.75
Area of pile = 1.767 m2
Pier Size = 1.8 X 6.40 15.3 MT
-4.5, 2.25 0, 2.25 4.5, 2.25
3
Unit Weight of R.C.C = 2.5 t/m B B
Self weight of Pile cap = 929 t
Total Length L1+Lf (Max scour) = 13.9 m
-4.5, -2.25 0, -2.25 4.5, -2.25
Loads on Pile -4.5, -6.75 0, -6.75 4.5, -6.75

Normal-LWL Seismic & WInd - LWL
Maximum Pile Load = 279 t. OK 439 OK A
Minimum Pile Load = 171 t. OK -16 OK Max. horizontal load on pile ULS = 15 T OK
Normal-HFL Seismic - HFL .
Maximum Pile Load = 342 OK 502.25 OK
Minimum Pile Load = 231 OK 52 OK
Load due to ML = =
MT x 6.8 MT (REFER ANNEXURE VI)
Load due to MT = =
1 x 303.8 45.0 Normal Seismic
Type of Load case Sr no Pile capacity from soil investigation report = 500 t 625 t
Normal Load case 1 to 3 Maximum uplift Capacity of Pile = 150 t 187.5 t
Wind Load case 4 to 6 Lateral pile capacity from soil investigation report = 75 t
Seismic Transverse 7 to 12
Seismic Longitudinal 13 to 18
Seismic Vertical 19 to 24 ( self wt of pile excluded)
LWL -Case

no. (T) (T) (T)
(T) (T-m) (T-m) 2 (T-m)
1
2759 192 1475 117 0 230 41 4 275 185 10 61
N
o 2
r 2702 137 1556 117 0 225 43 3 271 179 10 61
m
a 3
l 2704 572 1488 117 0 225 41 13 279 171 10 61
4
2674 1077 1798 148 65 223 50 24 297 149 13 84
W
i 5
2617 602 1879 148 37 218 52 13 284 153 13 80
n
d 6
2619 1458 1811 148 65 218 50 32 301 136 13 84
7 2457 6134 3046 300 719 205 85 136 426 -16 65 406
8 2739 6165 2658 300 719 228 74 137 439 17 65 406
9 2447 6101 2674 300 715 204 74 136 414 -6 65 404
10 2727 6101 2674 300 715 227 74 136 437 17 65 404
11
2447 6174 2660 300 714 204 74 137 415 -7 65 403
12 2727 6174 2660 300 714 227 74 137 438 16 65 403
S 13 2460 1876 5501 721 216 205 153 42 399.47 10 63 392
e
14 2736 1876 5501 721 216 228 153 42 422.54 34 63 392
i
s 15 2448 1849 616 721 215 204 17 41 262.24 146 63 391
m 16 2725 1849 5517 721 215 227 153 41 421.44 33 63 391
i
17 2449 1932 5503 721 214 204 153 43 399.87 8 63 391
c
18 2725 1932 5503 721 214 227 153 43 422.93 31 63 391
19 2129 1876 3046 333 216 177 85 42 303.68 51 33 207
20 3068 1876 3046 333 216 256 85 42 381.93 129 33 207
21 2119 1849 3062 333 215 177 85 41 302.77 50 33 206
22 3054 1849 3062 333 215 254 85 41 380.63 128 33 206
23 2120 1932 3048 333 214 177 85 43 304.31 49 33 206
24 3054 1932 3048 333 214 254 85 43 382.08 127 33 206

Akshit S.Chatterjee
HFL Case

no. (T) (T) (T)
(T) (T-m) (T-m) 2 (T-m)
N 1
o 3495 224 1512 127 11 291 42 5 338.19 244 11 66
r 2
m 3438 170 1592 127 11 286 44 4 334.48 238 11 66
a
3
l 3439 605 1524 127 11 287 42 13 342.40 231 11 66
4 3409 1110 1835 158 76 284 51 25 359.74 208 15 91
W
5
i 3352 635 1915 158 49 279 53 14 346.67 212 14 86
n
6
d 3354 1491 1847 158 76 280 51 33 363.96 195 15 91
7 3192 6174 2695 310 730 266 75 137 478.09 54 66 413
8 3474 6204 2695 310 730 290 75 138 502.25 77 66 413
9 3182 6140 2711 310 726 265 75 136 476.90 53 66 411
10 3462 6140 2711 310 726 289 75 136 500.26 77 66 411
11 3182 6213 2698 310 726 265 75 138 478.20 52 66 411
12 3462 6213 2698 310 726 289 75 138 501.53 76 66 411
S 13 3195 1910 5544 730 226 266 154 42 462.68 70 64 398
e 14 3472 1910 5544 730 226 289 154 42 485.75 93 64 398
i
15 3183 1883 659 730 225 265 18 42 325.45 205 64 398
s
m 16 3460 1883 5560 730 225 288 154 42 484.65 92 64 398
i 17 3184 1966 5546 730 225 265 154 44 463.07 68 64 398
c
18 3461 1966 5546 730 225 288 154 44 486.14 91 64 398
19 2864 1910 3083 342 226 239 86 42 366.73 111 34 214
20 3803 1910 3083 342 226 317 86 42 444.98 189 34 214
21 2855 1883 3099 342 225 238 86 42 365.83 110 34 213
22 3789 1883 3099 342 225 316 86 42 443.69 188 34 213
23 2856 1966 3085 342 225 238 86 44 367.37 109 34 213
24 3789 1966 3085 342 225 316 86 44 445.14 186 34 213

Akshit S.Chatterjee
Design of Pile Foundation - SLS
No. of piles = 12 ###

0
Column and C.G of Pile = m
Minimum Thickness of
0.85
Pile cap = 2.25 m 6.75 6.75 6.75
Thickness of pile cap = 2.25 m
Area of pile = 2 2.25 2.25 2.25
1.767 m
Unit Weight of R.C.C = 2.5 t/m 3

-2.25 -2.25 -2.25
Self weight of Pile cap = 929.5 t 15.3
Total Length L1+Lf = 13.9 m
Length of pile = 22.0 m -6.75 -6.75 -6.75

Reduction factor for pile B.M= 0.90 (IS 2911 part 1, sec iv, fig 5)
Loads on Pile
Normal HFL
Maximum Pile Load = 328 t. 395
Minimum Pile Load = 182 t. 245 .
Calculation of loads on piles for each load combination Max. horizontal load on pile = 12.81 T

Load due to ML = =
MT 6.8 x MT (REFER ANNEXURE VI)
Load due to MT = =
1 303.8 x 45.0 Pile capacity from soil investigation report 500 t
Type of Load case Sr no Maximum uplift Capacity of Pile = 150 t
Normal Load case-rare 1 to 3 Lateral pile capacity from soil investigation reporty 75 t
Wind Load case -rare 4 to 6
Normal Load case-frequent 7 to 9
Wind Load case -frquent 10 to 12
Quasi Permanent 13 ( self wt of pile excluded)
LWL - Case

Load Max. Resultant
no. load (T) H (T)
(T) (T-m) (T-m) 2 (T-m)
1 3135 723 1669 136 39 261 46 16 324 199 12 74

2 3078 416 1750 136 22 257 49 9 314 199 11 72
3 3080 1104 1681 136 39 257 47 25 328 185 12 74
4 3051 1029 1430 119 65 254 40 23 317 192 11 71
5 3008 567 1490 119 37 251 41 13 305 197 10 65
6 3009 1315 1439 119 65 251 40 29 320 182 11 71
7 3093 587 1268 103 33 258 35 13 306 210 9 56
8 3051 335 1328 103 19 254 37 7 299 210 9 55
9 3052 872 1277 103 33 254 35 19 309 199 9 56
10 2974 570 489 42 39 248 14 13 274 222 5 30
11
2962 306 505 42 22 247 14 7 268 226 4 25
12 2963 646 491 42 39 247 14 14 275 219 5 30
13 2985 0 0 0 0 249 0 0 249 249 0 0

Akshit S.Chatterjee
HFL - Case
Load Max. Resultant
no. load (T) H (T)
(T) (T-m) (T-m) 2 (T-m)
1 3921 756 1706 145 50 327 47 17 391 263 13 80
2 3864 449 1786 145 34 322 50 10 382 262 12 78
3 3866 1137 1718 145 50 322 48 25 395 249 13 80
4 3836 1062 1466 128 76 320 41 24 384 255 12 78
5 3794 600 1526 128 49 316 42 13 372 260 11 72
6 3795 1348 1475 128 76 316 41 30 387 245 12 78
7 3879 619 1304 113 44 323 36 14 373 273 10 63
8 3836 368 1365 113 30 320 38 8 366 274 10 61
9 3838 905 1314 113 44 320 36 20 376 263 10 63
10 3760 603 525 52 50 313 15 13 341 285 6 38
11 3748 339 541 52 34 312 15 8 335 290 5 32
12 3749 679 528 52 50 312 15 15 342 283 6 38
13 3770 0 0 0 0 314 0 0 314 314 0 0
..1 Calculation of depth of fixity and maximum moment in pile for Maximum scour

T = (E * I / K1)^0.2
where
E = Youngs Modulus of the concrete in kg/cm 2 = 32000000 kn/m^2
I = Moment of Inertia of the pile cross section in cm=4 0.2485049 m^4
K1 = Modulus of subgrade reaction as per Table 1 = 7700 kn/m^3
Q = Resultant horizontal force on pile - NORMAL = t
CASE (MAX) 12.8123
= Resultant horizontal force on pile - SEISMIC = 9.0 t
T = (32000000 * 0.248504887637474 / 7700) ^ 0.2 )= 4.0 m
L1 = Free length of pile above ground level = 5.4 m

= 5.4 m
L1 / T = 5.4 / 4.0 = 1.3
Lf / T = (fig 2 - for fixed headed piles in sands ) = 2.1
Lf = 2.1 * 4.0 = 8.5 m

= 8.5 m
Y = Q * (L1 + Lf)3 / (12[pile
* E head
* I) deflection of equivalent cantilever for fixed head pile]
= 0.0036 m
3.6 mm

where

by Four-Laning of NH-31D from KM 113.20 to KM 154.854 (Package-II A)
Job No 4800197 Date
Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the state of West Bengal
Akshit S.Chatterjee
Pile Desgin-SLS

S.no P ML MT HL HT S.no P ML MT HL HT
1 -1988 736 0 118 0 1 -2626 801 0 128 0
2 -1987 717 0 115 0 2 -2624 777 0 124 0
3 -1854 736 0 118 0 3 -2492 801 0 128 0
4 -1916 706 0 113 0 4 -2554 778 0 125 0
5 -1967 649 0 104 0 5 -2604 715 0 114 0
6 -1816 706 0 113 0 6 -2453 778 0 125 0
7 -2487 0 0 0 0 7 -3142 0 0 0 0
Pile design
SLS - Stress check
stress Limit
Compressive stress 2.5 Mpa 16.8 Mpa OK
Stress in steel 8.8 Mpa 440 Mpa OK
Result of critical case - SLS rare
Limit
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
Design of Pile Foundation-ULS
10.8
No. of piles = 12
Eccentricity between Column
0
and C.G of Pile group = m
6.75 6.75 6.75 0.85
cap = 2.25 m
Pile offset from edge = m 2.25 2.25 2.25
0.15
Area of pile = 2 15.3
1.767 m
Pier Size = 1.8 X 6.40 -2.25 -2.25 -2.25
Unit Weight of R.C.C = 2.5 t/m 3
Self weight of Pile cap = 929.5 t

Scouring length of Pile Max scour HFL-S LWL-S -6.75 -6.75 -6.75
Total Length L1+Lf = 13.9 m 12.5 m 11.2 m

Load due to ML = =
MT x 6.8 MT
Load due to MT = =
1 x 303.8 45.0
Type of Load case Sr no
Normal Load case 1 to 3
Wind Load case 4 to 6
Trans seismic Load case 7 to 12
Long seismic Load case 13 to 18
Vertical seismic load case 19 to 24
Accidental Load case 25 to 30
( self wt of pile excluded)
LWL- Case
Vertical Load due Load due to BM for pile
Load HT Max. Min. load Resultant
load P MT (T-m) ML (T-m) HL (T) P/n (T) to ML -P1 MT -P1 =H(L1+Lf)/2
no. (T) load (T) (T) H (T)
(T) (T-m) (T-m) (T-m)
1 4299 1084 2504 204 59 358 70 24 452 265 18 110
2 4214 624 2625 204 34 351 73 14 438 264 17 107
3 4217 1655 2522 204 59 351 70 37 458 245 18 110
4 4177 1549 1863 154 98 348 52 34 434 262 15 95
5 4112 855 2274 181 56 343 63 19 425 261 16 99
6 4114 1987 2195 181 98 343 61 44 448 238 17 107

7 3506 9222 2680 337 1071 292 74 205 572 13 94 584
8 3928 9222 2680 337 1071 327 74 205 607 48 94 584
9 3495 9130 2696 337 1065 291 75 203 569 13 93 582
10 3916 9130 2696 337 1065 326 75 203 604 49 93 582
11 3496 9197 2683 337 1064 291 75 204 570 12 93 581

12 3916 9197 2683 337 1064 326 75 204 605 47 93 581
13 3509 2793 8228 1067 321 292 229 62 583 2 93 580
14 3925 2793 8228 1067 321 327 229 62 618 36 93 580

15 3498 2758 8244 1067 320 291 229 61 582 1 93 580
16 3913 2758 8244 1067 320 326 229 61 616 36 93 580
17 292 229 63 583 0 93 580

3498 2839 8231 1067 319
18 326 229 63 618 34 93 580
3914 2839 8231 1067 319
19 3013 2793 2758 337 321 251 77 62 390 112 39 242
20 4421 2793 2758 337 321 368 77 62 507 230 39 242
21 3005 2758 2774 337 320 250 77 61 389 112 39 242
22 4406 2758 2774 337 320 367 77 61 506 229 39 242
23 3006 2839 2760 337 319 251 77 63 390 111 39 242
24 4406 2839 2760 337 319 367 77 63 507 227 39 242
Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
HFL - Case
1 5363 1117 2540 213 70 447 71 25 542 352 19 117
2 5278 657 2661 213 45 440 74 15 528 351 18 113
3 5281 1688 2559 213 70 440 71 38 549 331 19 117
4 5241 1582 1900 164 109 437 53 35 525 349 16 102
5 5176 888 2310 191 67 431 64 20 515 347 17 105
6 5178 2019 2232 191 109 432 62 45 538 325 18 114

7 4519 9261 2718 346 1082 377 75 206 658 95 95 591
8 4942 9261 2718 346 1082 412 75 206 693 131 95 591
9 4509 9170 2734 346 1077 376 76 204 655 96 94 589
10 4929 9170 2734 346 1077 411 76 204 690 131 94 589
11 4509 9236 2720 346 1076 376 76 205 657 95 94 588
12 4929 9236 2720 346 1076 411 76 205 692 130 94 588
13 4523 2827 8271 1076 332 377 230 63 669 84 94 586
14 4938 2827 8271 1076 332 411 230 63 704 119 94 586
15 4511 2792 8287 1076 330 376 230 62 668 84 94 586
16 4927 2792 8287 1076 330 411 230 62 703 118 94 586
17 4512 2873 8273 1076 330 376 230 64 670 82 94 586
18 4927 2873 8273 1076 330 411 230 64 704 117 94 586
19 4026 2827 2795 346 332 336 78 63 476 195 40 250
20 5435 2827 2795 346 332 453 78 63 593 312 40 250
21 4018 2792 2811 346 330 335 78 62 475 195 40 249
22 5420 2792 2811 346 330 452 78 62 592 311 40 249
23 4019 2873 2798 346 330 335 78 64 477 193 40 249
24 5419 2873 2798 346 330 452 78 64 593 310 40 249
Load case No:7 to 24 seismic load combination is taken as 1.35 times the forces transmitted to it by substructure as per Cl.219.8 of IRC : 6-2017
Calculation of depth of fixity and maximum moment in pile for HFL scour
Max scour
T = (E * I / K1)^0.2
where
E = Youngs Modulus of the concrete in kg/cm2 = 32000000 kn/m^2
I = Moment of Inertia of the pile cross section in =cm 4 0.2485049 m^4
K1 = Modulus of subgrade reaction as per Table 1= 7700 kn/m^3
Q = Resultant horizontal force on pile - =
NORMAL CASE (MAX) 18.7 t
= Resultant horizontal force on pile - =
SEISMIC 94.7 t
T = (32000000 * 0.248504887637474 / 7700) ^ 0.2

= ) 4.0 m
HFL-S scour LWL-S- Scour
L1 = Free length of pile above ground level = 5.4 m 4.047 m 2.709 m
= 5.4 m 4.0 m 2.7 m
L1 / T = 5.4 / 4.0 = 1.3 1.01 0.676
Lf / T = (fig 2 - for fixed headed piles in sands ) = 2.1 2.1 2.1
Lf = 2.1 * 4.0 = 8.5 m 8.5 m 8.5 m

= 8.5 m 8.5 m 8.5 m
Y = Q * (L1 + Lf)3 / (12 * [pile

E * I)head deflection of equivalent cantilever for fixed head pile]
= 0.0052 m
5.2 mm

where
4800197-GGN-DD-013

Akshit S.Chatterjee
Pile Desgin- ULS

S.no P ML MT HT HL S.no P ML MT HT HL
1 -2646 1104 0 0 177 1 -3515 1168 0 0 187
2 -2644 1075 0 0 172 2 -3513 1134 0 0 182
3 -2445 1104 0 0 177 3 -3315 1168 0 0 187
4 -2619 951 0 0 152 4 -3489 1025 0 0 164
5 -2605 988 0 0 158 5 -3474 1054 0 0 169
6 -2377 1072 0 0 172 6 -3246 1144 0 0 183
7 -128 5844 0 0 935 7 -953 5915 0 0 947
8 -480 5844 0 0 935 8 -1305 5915 0 0 947
9 -135 5819 0 0 931 9 -960 5889 0 0 943
10 -485 5819 0 0 931 10 -1311 5889 0 0 943
11 -124 5812 0 0 930 11 -950 5883 0 0 941
12 -474 5812 0 0 930 12 -1300 5883 0 0 941
13 -18 5800 0 0 928 13 -843 5865 0 0 939
14 -364 5800 0 0 928 14 -1189 5865 0 0 939
15 -12 5798 0 0 928 15 -837 5863 0 0 938
16 -358 5798 0 0 928 16 -1183 5863 0 0 938
17 2 5797 0 0 928 17 -823 5862 0 0 938
18 -344 5797 0 0 928 18 -1169 5862 0 0 938
19 -1124 2423 0 0 388 19 -1950 2496 0 0 400
20 -2298 2423 0 0 388 20 -3124 2496 0 0 400
21 -1120 2418 0 0 387 21 -1947 2491 0 0 399
22 -2288 2418 0 0 387 22 -3115 2491 0 0 399
23 -1107 2416 0 0 387 23 -1934 2489 0 0 398
24 -2274 2416 0 0 387 24 -3100 2489 0 0 398
Design of Pile section Fagus - ULS
Cross - section
Main steel Shear RF
no. of bar 24 no. of bar 24 dia 16 mm
dia 32 mm dia 25 mm spacing 150 mm
Total Asr 19302 mm^2 Total Asr 11780.97 mm^2
% of r/f 1.76 %
4800197-GGN-DD-013

Akshit S.Chatterjee
Section check
UR 0.91 OK
Annexure - I
General
Ductile detailing shall be carried out for bridges located in zones III,IV and V of
seismic zone map of IRC:6
For Pier bottom level:

NEd = 30381 kN
Ac = 1.2E+07 mm2
As = 108131 mm2
fck = 35 N/mm2 fy = 550 N/mm2
hk = 0.075 < 0.08
Minimum confining reinforcement required
fyd = 478 N/mm2 fcd = 16 N/mm2
Confining reinforcement ratio wwd = rwfyd/fcd
6250 mm
B core dimension (along trans dimension)
1650 mm
D core dimension (along longitudinal dimension)
Dia. Of stirrup along B f = 12 mm
no. of legs along width (along trans dimension) = 27
Dia. Of stirrup along D f = 10 mm
no. of legs along Depth (along long dimension) = 10
2
Confined area = 10312500 mm
100 mm
Spacing of hoops or ties SL =
Minimum Spacing is 200 Ref Fig 17.2 of Code
Volumetric ratio Pw, B (along trans dimension) = 0.004885805
Volumetric ratio Pw, D (along long dimension) = 0.004759989

ωwd
B = 0.149468399 min 0.12
ωwd
D = 0.145619387 min 0.12
Area of gross concrete section Ac = 11520000 mm2
Confined concrete area within the outside

dia of hoop ACC
10312500 mm2
=
Normalised axial force hk = 0.0753
reinforcement ratio rL = 0.0094

ww req = 0.029
Minimum design confining ωwd
= 0.120
reinforcement
O.K
Extent of confining reinforcement
Since nk < 0.3, Length of confinment = 1.8256 m

Refer:- IRC:112-2011 Cl 17.2.1.4
Confinement RF
DESIGN OF PILE CAP FOR PIER-P7
INPUT AND
LOAD CALCULATIONS
Akshit S.Chatterjee
Layout of Pile cap

Gradation to Four Laning of NH-31D from Km. 113+200 to km. 154+854
(Package-2-A) of Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the State of West
Bengal on EPC mode Designed by: Checked by: Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
ULS CONDITION

(Refer Design document- 4800197-GGN-DD-040 for Pier, ULS design summary)

Group I (Case-1) 4299 1084 2504
Group I (Case-2) 4214 624 2625
Group I (Case-3) 4217 1655 2522
V) 3506 9222 2680
Transverse(+V) 3928 9222 2680
V) 3495 9130 2696
(+V) 3916 9130 2696
V) 3496 9197 2683
Transverse(+V) 3916 9197 2683
LWL
Group IV (Case-1A) Seismic CASE
Longitudinal(-V) 3509 2793 8228
Group IV (Case-2A) Seismic

3005 2758 2774
Group I (Case-1) 5363 1117 2540
Group I (Case-2) 5278 657 2661
Group I (Case-3) 5281 1688 2559
Group II(Case-2) Wind Load HFL
5176 888 2310
CASE
V) 4519 9261 2718
Transverse(+V) 4942 9261 2718
V) 4509 9170 2734
Akshit S.Chatterjee
Group III (Case-2B) Seismic Transverse ULS CONDITION

(+V) 4929 9170 2734
V) 4509 9236 2720
Transverse(+V) 4929 9236 2720
Longitudinal(+V) 4927 2792 8287 HFL
Group IV (Case-3A) Seismic CASE
No. of piles = 12
Size of Pile cap = 10.8 x 15.3
SECTION MODULUS
PILE 1 2 3 4
ZT 45 135 -135 -45
ZL 36 36 36 36
LOAD CASE 1 2 3 4 TOTAL
Group I (Case-1)
452 436 420 404 1711
Group I (Case-2)
438 429 419 410 1696
Group I (Case-3)
458 434 409 385 1686

434 411 388 365 1600

425 412 399 387 1623
Group II(Case-3) Wind Load LWL CASE

448 419 389 360 1615
V) 572 435 298 162 1466
Transverse(+V) 607 470 334 197 1607
V) 569 434 299 163 1465
(+V) 604 469 334 198 1605
V) 570 434 298 161 1463
Akshit S.Chatterjee

Transverse(+V) 605 469 333 196 1603
Longitudinal(-V) 583 542 500 459 2084
Longitudinal(+V) 618 576 535 494 2222
Longitudinal(-V) 582 541 500 459 2082
Longitudinal(+V) 616 576 535 494 2220
Longitudinal(-V) 583 541 499 457 2081
LWL CASE
Longitudinal(+V) 618 576 534 492 2219

390 348 307 266 1311

507 466 424 383 1780

389 348 307 266 1310

506 465 424 383 1777

390 348 306 264 1309
Group V (Case-3B) Seismic Vertical(+V) 507 465 423 381 1775
Group I (Case-1) 542 526 509 493 2070
Group I (Case-2) 528 519 509 499 2055
Group I (Case-3) 549 524 499 474 2044
Group II(Case-1) Wind Load 525 501 478 454 1958

V) 658 521 383 246 1808
Transverse(+V) 693 556 419 281 1949
V) 655 520 384 248 1807
(+V) 690 555 419 283 1947
HFL CASE
V) 657 520 383 246 1805
Transverse(+V) 692 555 418 281 1945
Longitudinal(-V) 669 628 586 544 2427
Longitudinal(+V) 704 662 620 578 2565
Longitudinal(-V) 668 627 585 544 2425
Longitudinal(+V) 703 661 620 579 2563
Longitudinal(-V) 670 627 585 542 2423
Longitudinal(+V) 704 662 619 577 2562
Group V (Case-1A) Seismic Vertical(-V) 476 434 392 350 1653
Group V (Case-2A) Seismic Vertical(-V) 475 434 392 351 1652

Akshit S.Chatterjee
ULS CONDITION
Group V (Case-3A) Seismic Vertical(-V) HFL CASE

477 434 391 349 1651

LEVER ARM = 3.60 m
MOMENT = 9234 tm
Lever arm = 2.25 m
Maximum shear at face of pile = 2565 t

Net shear = 2178 t
av = 3.60 m
deff = 2.16 m
0.5deff = 1.081 m
2deff = 4.325 m
β = av/2d
= 0.83
SECTION MODULUS
PILE 1 5 9
ZT 45 45 45
ZL 36 1.00E+09 -36
Group I (Case-1)
452 382 313 1147
Group I (Case-2)
438 365 292 1095
Group I (Case-3)
458 388 318 1164
LWL
434 383 331 1148 CASE

425 362 298 1085

448 387 326 1161
V) 572 497 423 1491
Akshit S.Chatterjee

Transverse(+V) 607 532 458 1597
V) 569 494 419 1483
(+V) 604 529 454 1588
V) 570 496 421 1487
Transverse(+V) 605 531 456 1592
Longitudinal(-V) 583 355 126 1064
Longitudinal(+V) 618 389 161 1167
Longitudinal(-V) 582 353 124 1058
Group IV (Case-2B) Seismic LWL
Longitudinal(+V) 616 387 158 1162 CASE
Longitudinal(-V) 583 355 126 1064
Longitudinal(+V) 618 389 161 1168

390 313 237 939

507 431 354 1292

389 312 235 935

506 428 351 1285

390 314 237 941

507 430 354 1291
Group I (Case-1)
542 472 401 1415
Group I (Case-2)
528 454 380 1363
Group I (Case-3)
549 478 406 1433

525 472 419 1416

515 451 387 1353

538 476 414 1429
V) 658 582 507 1747
Transverse(+V) 693 618 542 1853 HFL
Group III (Case-2A) Seismic Transverse (- CASE
V) 655 579 504 1738
(+V) 690 615 539 1844
V) 657 581 505 1743
Transverse(+V) 692 616 540 1848
Longitudinal(-V) 669 440 210 1319
Longitudinal(+V) 704 474 245 1423
Longitudinal(-V) 668 438 208 1314
Longitudinal(+V) 703 473 242 1418
Akshit S.Chatterjee
Group IV (Case-3A) Seismic ULS CONDITION

Longitudinal(-V) 670 440 210 1319
Longitudinal(+V) 704 474 245 1423

476 398 321 1195

593 516 438 1547 HFL
CASE
475 397 319 1191

592 514 436 1541

477 399 321 1196

593 515 438 1546

LEVER ARM = 3.55 m
MOMENT = 6577 tm
Lever arm = 2.23 m
Maximum shear at face of pile = 1852.79 t

Net shear = 1582.45 t
av = 3.55 m
deff = 2.16 m
0.5deff = 1.081 m
2deff = 4.325 m
β = av/2d
= 0.82
Akshit S.Chatterjee
SLS CONDITION

(Refer Design document- 4800197-GGN-DD-xxx for Pier, SLS design summary)

3135 723 1669
3078 416 1750
3080 1104 1681
3051 1029 1430
3008 567 1490
3009 1315 1439
LWL CASE
3093 587 1268
3051 335 1328
3052 872 1277
2974 570 489
2962 306 505

3921 756 1706
3864 449 1786
3866 1137 1718
3836 1062 1466
3794 600 1526
3795 1348 1475
HFL CASE
3879 619 1304
3836 368 1365
3838 905 1314
3760 603 525
3748 339 541
Group V (Case-1- Quasi permanent) 2985 0 0 LWL CASE
Group V (Case-1- Quasi permanent) 3770 0 0 HFL CASE
No. of piles = 12
SECTION MODULUS
PILE 1 2 3 4
ZT 45 135 -135 -45
ZL 36 36 36 36
LOAD CASE 1 2 3 4 TOTAL

Group I (Case-1 service-Rare) 324 313 302 292 1231
Group II (Case-1 wind load-Rare) 317 302 286 271 1176
LWL CASE
Akshit S.Chatterjee
Group II (Case-2 wind load-Rare) 305 SLS

296CONDITION
288 279 1168
LWL CASE
Group III (Case-1 Service-Frequent) 306 297 289 280 1172
Group IV (Case 1 Wind Load-Frequent) 274 266 257 249 1046
Group II (Case-3 wind load-Rare) 387 367 347 327 1429 HFL CASE
LEVER ARM = 3.60 m
MOMENT = 5387.35 tm
3
3
Lever arm = 2.25 m
SECTION MODULUS
PILE 1 5 9
ZT 45 45 45
ZL 36 1.00E+09 -36

Group II (Case-3 wind load-Rare) 320 280 240 840 LWL
Group II (Case-1 wind load-Rare) 384 343 303 1030 HFL
Group II (Case-2 wind load-Rare) 372 329 287 988 CASE
Akshit S.Chatterjee
Group III (Case-3 Service-Frequent) 376 SLS

340CONDITION
303 1020
Group IV (Case 1 Wind Load-Frequent) 341 327 312 980 HFL
Group IV (Case 2 Wind Load-Frequent) 335 320 305 960 CASE

LEVER ARM = 3.55 m
MOMENT = 3699.96 tm
3
3
Lever arm = 2.23 m
CRACK WIDTH
V = 3770 t
Max Load on a Pile= 314 t
Long. Dir
Lever arm = 2.25 m
Trans. Dir
Lever arm = 2.23 m
ULS CHECK
Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-013

Detailed Engineering in Connection with Rehabilitation and Up-Gradation to
Four Laning of NH-31D from Km. 113+200 to km. 154+854 (Package-2-A) of
Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the State of West Bengal on EPC mode
Akshit S.Chatterjee
Long. Dir Trans. Dir

beff for cantiliver slab = 1.2a+b1
a = 3.6 3.55 m
b1 = 1.5 1.5 m
beff = 5.82 5.76 m
Hence it overlaps =
beff modified = 3.81 3.78 m
Max. Shear = 704.24 704.24 t
Load/m = 184.84 186.31 t/m
ULS Moment = 665.42 661.39 tm/m
Material Specification:
Concrete grade M35

Characteristic Compressive Strength of Concrete, fck Mpa 35
Concrete material factor (Уm) 1.50
Design Compressive strength of Concrete, fcd Mpa 15.63
Tensile strength of concrete , fctm Mpa 2.80
Strain at reaching Characteistic Strength, ec2 0.0020
Ultimate Strain, ecu2 0.0035
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete ( Ecm ) Gpa 32
Steel Grade Fe550

Yield Strength of Reinforcement, fy or fyk Mpa 550.00
Partial factor for steel (Уs) 1.15
Design Yield Strength of Reinforcement, fyd Mpa 478.261
Modulus of Elasticity of Steel ( Es) Gpa 200
Dry weight of Concrete KN/m³ 25
Permissible Crack Width mm 0.300
Maximum compressive stress in concrete under rare combination
fck 0.48
N/mm² 16.80
Maximum tensile stress in steel under rare combination fyk 0.6
N/mm² 330.00
STRENGTH CHECK
Pile cap
Pile cap
Sl No. Parameters Units Trans.
Long. Dir
Dir
1 MOMENT KN-M 6528 6488
2 SHEAR FORCE KN 1813 1828
MATERIAL DATA
3 Grade of Steel 550 550
4 Characteristic strength of reinf. (fyk) Mpa 550 550
5 Partial factor for steel (Уs) 1.15 1.15
6 Design value for tensile strength (fyd = fyk/Уs) Mpa 478.26 478.26
7 Modulus of Elasticity of Steel (Es) Gpa 200 200
8 Grade of Concrete 35 35
9 Charecterstic comp. strength (fck) Mpa 35 35
10 α 0.67 0.67
11 Concrete material factor (Уm) 1.50 1.50
Design value for Concrete comp. strength (fcd =
12 Mpa 15.63 15.63
αfck/Уm)
Design of Pier Cap

Geometric Data
13 Width of slab(b) mm 1000 1000
14 depth of Member mm 2250 2250
15 Clear Cover mm 75 75
20 Area of reinforcement mm² 10058 10058
21 Reinforcement (Ast/bd) 0.0047 0.0047
22 Hence Pt= (100*Ast/bd) % 0.47 0.47
23 Dia of Shear Reinforcement links mm 8 8
24 Spacing of reinforcement in other direction mm 160 160
25 number of legs Nos. 6 6
26 Reinforcement(%)
As per Clause 16.5.1.1 of IRC:112-2014, Min. & Max Main
Reinforcement.
27 Min. Main Reinforcement mm² 2862 2763
28 Status O.K. O.K.
29 Max. Main Reinforcement mm² 56250 56250
30 Status O.K. O.K.
Strength of section
31 Eff. depth of section (d = D-c-φ/2) mm 2163 2125
32 Depth of NA from comp. flange (x) mm 385 385
33 λ 0.80 0.80
34 η 1.00 1.00
35 Depth of stress Block (λx) mm 308 308
36 Stress on stress Block (η fcd) MPa 15.63 15.63
37 Total comp. force (Fc = λxηfcdb) KN 4810 4810
38 Total tension Force (Fs = fyd At) KN 4810 4810
39 Diff (Fc-Fs) KN 0 0
40 Depth of Lever arm (z) = d-λx/2 mm 2009 1971
41 Moment of resistance (Fc*z) KN-m 9662 9482
42 UR for pure bending 0.68 0.68
43 Status O.K. O.K.
Shear Resistance
56 Shear reduction factor, β = αv/2d
57 0.5d = mm 1081 1063
58 2d = mm 4325 4250
59 αv = m 3.600 3.550
60 β= 0.832 0.821
61 Design Shear force,Ved = kN 1509 1500
62 K = 1+sqrt(200/d)<=2 1.304 1.307
63 σcp MPa 0.000 0.000
64 ρ1=At/(bd)<=0.02 0.005 0.005
65 Vmin = 0.031*k^(3/2).fck^(1/2) KN 0.273 0.274
66 Concrete Shear Capacity Vrd.c =
KN 789 782
67 [0.12.K(80p1fck)^0.33+(0.15σcp)]bwd
68 Min. Concrete Shear Capacity Vrd.cmin =
KN 591 582
69 [Vmin+(0.15σcp)]bwd
70 Status (if 0 = reinf. Not reqd;or 1 = reinf reqd) 1. 1.

71 Design shear force (Ved) KN 1509 1500
72 Design yield strength. of shear reinf. (fywd=fyd) MPa 478.26 478.26
73 Cotθ 1.00 1.00
74 Required area of Shear reinforcement (Aws) mm²/mm 259 262
75 Nos 6 6
76 Provided area of Shear reinforcement (Aws) mm²/mm 302 302
77 shear capacity w/ vertical shear renf.(Vrd,s) KN 1755 1724
78 αcw 1.00 1.00
79 V1 0.53 0.60
80 Max. shear Capcity w/ vertical shear renf. (VRd,max) KN 8097 8970
81 Final shear Capcity (VRd) KN 1755 1724
82 UR for only shear= 0.86 0.87
83 Status O.K. O.K.
Design of Pier Cap

As per Clause 10.3.3.5 of IRC:112-2011, Minimum Shear
Reinforcement.
84 Min. Shear Reinforcement Asw min/s mm²/mm 0.6583 0.6583
86 Spacing of reinforcement mm 160 160
87 Area of reinforcement Asw/s provided mm² 1.88 1.88
88 Status O.K. O.K.
44 Effective As long for only Bending mm² 6795 6882

45 DFtd KN 754.66 750.08
46 As long for additional tensile RF from Shear force mm² 1577 1568
47 UR for combined shear + bending 0.83 0.84
48 Status O.K. O.K.
49 Max. strain on concrete in comp. 0.0035 1.0035
50 Max. strain on reinf. in tension 0.0044 0.0044
51 Max. depth of NA From Comp. Flange mm 959 2116
52 Status (under/Reinf, Over Reinf or Bal) U/R U/R
53 fctm MPa 2.80 0.00
54 Min. reinforcement mm² 2862 2763
55 Status O.K. O.K.
*Surface Reinforcement (Cl. 16.5.4 (4)-IRC:112-2011)

Minimum Surface Reinforcement (1% of Act,ext) mm2 750 750
Dia of Reinforcement (φ) mm 16 16
Spacing of Reinforcement (s) mm 160 160
Reinforcement Provided mm2/m 1257 1257
Design of Pier Cap

PUNCHING SHEAR CHECK
Detailed Engineering in Connection with Rehabilitation and Up-Gradation to Four Laning 4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No 4800197
of NH-31D from Km. 113+200 to km. 154+854 (Package-2-A) of Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari 013
Design of Pier P7 for Ch: 123+518.5 Akshit S.Chatterjee 29-11-2019
DESIGN FOR PUNCHING SHEAR IN PILE CAP AS PER IRC : 112 - 2011
3
Density of concrete 25 KN/m
3
Density of soil 18 KN/m
Characteristic Strength, fck 35 Mpa
Design Strength of concrete, fcd 15.63 Mpa
Net Applied Force, Ved 6909 KN
Net downward force within the control perimeter, DVEd 1605.8 KN
Overall depth of pile cap 2250 mm
Effective Depth of Pile Cap, d 2142.0 mm
Reinforcement Ratio, rl 0.0047
Distance between the edge of pile to the edge of pier 3.070 < 2d
VEd,red = VEd - DVEd 5302.75 KN
n = 0.6 x [1-fck/310] 0.532
Maximum Punching Shear Resistance , nRd.max = 0.5 x n x fcd 4.16 Mpa
0.5
K = 1 + (200/d) 1.31 ≤2
nmin = 0.031 x K1.5 x (fck)0.5 0.274 Mpa
Distance of control perimeter from column periphery, a 3.070 mm
2xd/a 1395.44
Perimeter along control line, p 7682.00 mm
2
Area enclosed by control line 18.23 m
nEd,red = VEd,red /(bd) 0.322 MPa
nmin x 2d/a 381.773 MPa
nRd = 0.12 x K x (80.r1.fck)0.333 x (2d/a) 515.410 MPa
HENCE, OK
SLS CHECK
4800197-GGN-DD-
Detailed Engineering in Connection with Rehabilitation and Up-Gradation Job No 4800197 013
to Four Laning of NH-31D from Km. 113+200 to km. 154+854 (Package-2-
A) of Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the State of West Bengal on EPC
mode Designed by: Checked by: Date
Akshit S.Chatterjee
DESIGN OF foundation (SLS)
S.no. Refrence Unit Long Dir Long Dir
Load Data
1 Moment KN-m 44302 30396
Material Data
3 Charecterstic strength of reinforcement (fyk) Fe 550 Fe 550
9 α Cl 6.4.2.8,IRC 112 0.67 0.67
Design value for concrete compressive strength (fcd=
11 αfck/γm) Cl 6.4.2.8,IRC 112 MPa 15.63 15.63
Geometric Data
Stress Check
27 Effective Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete (Eeff) Cl 6.4.2.5,IRC 112MPa 12800 12800
28 Modular ratio (m) 15.63 15.63
29 Allowable stress in Steel Cl 12.2.2,IRC 112MPa 330 330
30 Allowable stress in Concrete Cl 12.2.2,IRC 112MPa 16.80 16.80
34 Diff. mm2 0 0
36 Stress in tension reinf. MPa 238.640 236.215
UR 0.72 0.72
37 Status O.K. O.K.
UR 0.31 0.31
39 Status O.K. O.K.
Document
LOUIS BERGER no.
4800197-GGN-
Akshit S.Chatterjee
CRACK WIDTH CHECK
S.no. Refrence Unit Long Dir Trans Dir
Load Data
1 Moment KN-m 35838 2745
Material Data
3 Charecterstic strength of reinforcement (fyk) Table 18.1,IRC 112MPa 550 550
9 α Cl 6.4.2.8,IRC 112 0.67 0.67
11 Design value for concrete compressive strength (fcd= αfck/γm)
Cl 6.4.2.8,IRC 112 MPa 15.63 15.63
Geometric Data
Stress Check
25 Age at Loading days 28 28
26 Relative humidity Table 6.9 , IRC %
112 12800 12800
28 Effective Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete (Eeff) Cl 6.4.2.5,IRC 112
MPa 1924.8 1924.8
29 Modular ratio (m) 103.906 103.906
30 Allowable stress in Steel Cl 12.2.2,IRC 112
MPa 440.0 440.0
31 Allowable stress in Concrete Cl 12.2.2,IRC 112
MPa 12.60 12.60
35 Diff. mm2 0.000 0.000
Document
LOUIS BERGER no.
4800197-GGN-
Akshit S.Chatterjee
37 Stress in tension reinf. ssc MPa 214.210 23.681

38 Status O.K. O.K.
40 Status O.K. O.K.
CALCULATION FOR CRACK WIDTH FOR BENDING As per 12.3.4 of IRC 112-2011
41 Wk = Sr,max (esm-ecm)
42 ae = Es/Ecm 6.25 6.25
43 depth hc,eff mm 218.8 312.5
44 Eff area of conc in tension surrounding reinf Ac,eff mm2 3346875 3375000
45 Rr,eff 0.0280 0.0196
46 fctm Mpa 2.800 2.800
47 fct,eff Mpa 2.800 2.800
48 kt 1.500 1.500
49 (esm-ecm)= {ssc - kt(fct,eff/Rr,eff)(1+aeRr,eff)}/Es 0.0002 -0.0011
50 0.6*ssc/Ec 0.0006 0.0001
51 (esm-ecm) 0.0006 0.0001
52 K1 0.80 0.80
53 K2 0.50 0.50
54 Minimum clear cover c 75.00 75.00
55 Srmax = 3.4c+0.425k1k2f/Rreff 407 471
56 Wk = Sr,max (esm-ecm) 0.261 0.033
57 Allowable crack width 0.300 1.300
58 UR 0.87 0.03
59 Status O.K. O.K.
DESIGN OF PIER CAP
INPUT AND
LOAD CALCULATIONS
Akshit S.Chatterjee
Design of Pier cap for Ch: 123+518.5 29-11-2019
Design of Pier Cap

The Wall Pier is rectangular in shape of dimension 1.8mx7m, with round corners 0.9m radius. The width of Pier Cap is 4.1m minimum in the
longitudinal direction. The pier cap is essentially subjected to bending moments predominantly in the transverse direction, as the outer
bearings are placed on cantilever part of pier cap.
12.9
2.35 2.05 2.05 2.05 2.05 2.35
0.85 P1 P3 P1
P1
1.2
4.1
1.2
A2
P2 P4 P2
0.85
Size of the pedestal = 1000 x 1000 mm

Size of the Bearing = 500 x 500 mm
Width of the Pier = 7 m. Length = 1.8 m.

Side of the equivalent square = 6.40 m. Eqv Cutwater = 0.64 m
Distance between point of load and Pier edge a = 0.90 m.

Distance fopr checking at face of pedestal a1 = 0.4 m.
Overall depth at junction = 1.50 m
Clear cover of the pier cap = 50 mm.
Assuming 20 nos 32 dia bars in top layer
20 nos 25 dia bars in 2nd layer
10 legged 16 dia @ 150 c/c stirrups
Effective depth d = 1.386 m
a/d 0.65 DESIGN AS CORBEL
Design of Pier Cap 3

Akshit S.Chatterjee
Load Calculation
Dead load for P1 = 212.00 t. **Load on permanent bearing during service

SIDL for P1 = 17.13 t. stage is taken from Grillage Analysis.
SIDL(varying) for P1 = 25.13 t.
Dead load for P2 = 212.00 t.
SIDL for P2 = 17.13 t.
SIDL(varying) for P2 = 25.13 t.
Selfweight of the piercap = 9.14 t/m. ** Wt of cantilever part of pier cap is
Wt of Transverse Stopper = 7.83 t. converted to udl
Lever arm = 0.90 m
Load Calculation for CWLL

Case-1: For maximum reaction/max transverse moment case
Impact Factor = 1.10
Reaction on P1 = 27.39 t (Impact Factor is 50% for Pier Cap )
Reaction on P1 due to transverse moment = ± 39.12 t
Reaction on P2 = 27.39 t (Impact Factor is 50% for Pier Cap )
** Ref CWLL analysis page for total LL
Total reaction on P1 = 320.77 t Reaction. It is distributed among 10 bearings
Total reaction on P2 = 320.77 t
Total reaction on the piercap = 641.55 t

Hence moment due to piercap reaction = 577.39 t-m
Torsional moment due to unbalanced reaction = 0.00 t-m
Equivalent B.M = 0.00 t-m
Equivalent Shear = 0.00 t S/w of cap - shear
Moment due to selfweight of the piercap = 55.32 t-m 37.540 t
& for trans. Seismic stopper
Hence total moment on the pier cap = 632.71 t-m
Case-2: For maximum torsional moment case (One Span Dislodged case)
LL Reaction on P1 = 0.00 t
** Ref CWLL analysis page for total LL
Total reaction on P1 = 254.26 t Reaction. It is distributed among 10 bearings
Total reaction on P2 = 0.00 t of one side span only
Total reaction on the Piercap = 254.26 t

Hence moment due to piercap reaction = 228.83 t-m
Torsional moment due to unbalanced reaction = 305.11 t-m
Equivalent B.M = 245.14 t-m
Equivalent Shear = 119.07 t
Hence total moment on the pier cap = 529.30 t-m
From the above it is clear that maximum Transverse moment case is governing.

SUMMARY OF FORCES
AND MOMENTS
Detailed Engineering in Connection with Rehabilitation and Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-013

Up-Gradation to Four Laning of NH-31D from Km. 113+200
to km. 154+854 (Package-2-A) of Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari
Akshit S.Chatterjee
SUMMARY OF FORCES & MOMENTS
Summary of Forces & Moments - ULS
P1+P2 for Corbal in transverse direction

Factored Factored Moment
Loads Load Factor Shear Moment
Shear
T T-m T T-m
Dead load 1.35 424.000 381.60 572.400 515.16
Dead load of Pier cap 1.35 37.540 55.32 50.679 74.6865911
SIDL 1.35 34.260 30.83 46.251 41.6259
SIDL - Wearing course 1.75 50.260 45.23 87.955 79.1595
LL 1.5 133.026 119.72 199.539 179.585396
956.824 890.217387
P1/P2 for Corbal in longitudnal direction

Factored Factored Moment
Factored Torsion
Shear
T T-m T T-m T-m
Dead load 1.35 212.000 246.12 286.200 332.266591
SIDL 1.35 17.130 15.42 23.126 20.81295
LL - Normal position 1.5 92.133 82.92 138.199 124.379145
Normal Combination 491.502 591.725027 411.9012
Torsion in Span Dislodged case

Factored Factored
Shear Moment
T T-m T T-m
Dead load 1.35 212.000 254.40 286.200 343.440
Dead load of Pier cap upto
1.35 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.000
pedastal face
SIDL 1.35 17.130 20.56 23.126 27.751
LL - Normal position 1.5 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.000
Normal Combination 353.303 423.964

Detailed Engineering in Connection with

Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-013
Rehabilitation and Up-Gradation to Four Laning of
NH-31D from Km. 113+200 to km. 154+854
(Package-2-A) of Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section Designed by: Checked by: Date
in the State of West Bengal on EPC mode Akshit S.Chatterjee
DESIGN OF PIER CAP (TRANSVERSE DIRECTION)
CORBEL DESIGN (as per Raina)
Grade of concrete M 35 Mpa

Grade of steel Fe 500 Mpa
m 1.4
DL of SuperStructure = 623.025 Tons

Total wt of SIDL = 134.206 Tons
Live load = 199.59 Tons
Total wt of superstructure= 956.821 Tons
Seismic Coeff
Zone 5
Z factor 0.36
R factor 3 for reaction blocks as per cl 219.5.5 Table 9 of IRC:6-2014
(for blocks designed as primary resisting members )
Importance 1.2 for Bridge
Sa/g = 2.5
ah = 0.18
Hence, Seismic force = 0.18 X 1591 Ton = 286.4 Tons
Force to be resisted by each reaction block = 286.4 Tons for 1.0 blocks
Factored load for seismic 1.5 times = 1.5 429.6 Tons
Height of the Reaction Block 1500 mm
Width of the reaction Block (dirn perpendicular to seismic dirn) b 4100 mm
Depth of the reaction Block (dirn parallel to seismic dirn) h 1125 mm
face to cg of load a 900 mm

thickness of corbel at face h 1125 mm
effective depth of corbel d' 1011 mm
d 809 (0.8d')
width of corbel b 4100 mm
Ultimate Shear force (seismic) Vu 957 T with factor of 1.5 for seismic
Hor force perpendicular to Vu Hu 429.6 T >=0.2Vu
Conc. shear capacity (10bd) Vc 331.6 T
Checks
ac/hc >= > 0.5 & < 1.0 0.800
a/d' <= 1 0.890 design as corbel
Vu/bd <= 0.15fc = 4.2 2.89 safe
Piercap_123+518.5_1_corbal
Detailed Engineering in Connection with

Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-013
Rehabilitation and Up-Gradation to Four Laning of
NH-31D from Km. 113+200 to km. 154+854
(Package-2-A) of Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section Designed by: Checked by: Date
in the State of West Bengal on EPC mode Akshit S.Chatterjee
Avf = Vu = 16081 mm2

0.85*fsy*m
At = Hu 10109 mm2
.85*fy
Af = Vu*a+Hu*(h-d') 26477 mm2

0.85*fsy*d
As >=(Af+At) 36586 As final 36586 mm2

(tensile) >=(.667*Avf+At) 20835
>=(.04*f'c/fsy)*bd' 9285
provide 32 dia bars (layer -1)
Nos 40
spacing 101 mm
provide 20 dia bars (layer -2)
Nos 40
As provided 44714 mm2 OK
Ah >=0.5As 18293 Ah final 18293 mm2

spacing of hor bars below top As = 2/3 depth
provide 16 dia bars
Legged 14 spacing 101
Nos. 7 Ah prov 19694 mm2 OK
vert spacing 148 mm c/c
Fed 957 ton > Vrd,c 331.6 ton Vert Stirrups reqd
Av (vert stirrrup) >= 0.5*F Ed /(fyd) = 10998 mm2
Provide 14 Legged 16 mm dia 5 Set vertically

Upto face of piercap
Av prov 14067 mm2 OK
Detailed Engineering in Connection with Rehabilitation

Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-013
and Up-Gradation to Four Laning of NH-31D from Km.
113+200 to km. 154+854 (Package-2-A) of
Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the State of West Designed by: Checked by: Date
Bengal on EPC mode Akshit S.Chatterjee
DESIGN OF PIER CAP (LONGITUDNAL DIRECTION)
CORBEL DESIGN (as per Raina)
Grade of concrete M 35 Mpa

Grade of steel Fe 500 Mpa
m 1.4
DL of SuperStructure = 286.2 Tons

Total wt of SIDL = 67.103 Tons
Live load = 138.20 Tons 0 FOR LONG DIRN.
Total wt of superstructure= 491.502 Tons
Seismic Coeff
Zone 5
Z factor 0.36
R factor 3 for reaction blocks as per cl 219.5.5 Table 9 of IRC:6-2014
(for blocks designed as primary resisting members )
Importance 1.2 for Bridge
Sa/g = 2.5
ah = 0.18
Hence, Seismic force = 0.18 X 507.0667 Ton = 91.3 Tons
Force to be resisted by each reaction block = 91.3 Tons for 1.0 blocks
Factored load for seismic 1.5 times = 1.5 136.9 Tons
Height of the Reaction Block 970 mm
Width of the reaction Block (dirn perpendicular to seismic dirn) b 1360 mm
Depth of the reaction Block (dirn parallel to seismic dirn) h 1500 mm
face to cg of load ac 300 mm

thickness of corbel at face hc 1500 mm
effective depth of corbel d' 1386 mm
d 1109 (0.8d')
width of corbel b 1360 mm
Ultimate Shear force (seismic) Vu 492 T with factor of 1.5 for seismic
Hor force perpendicular to Vu Hu 137 T >=0.2Vu
Conc. shear capacity (10bd) Vc 150.8 T
Checks
ac/hc >= > 0.5 & < 1.0 0.200
ac/d' <= 1 0.216 design as corbel
Vu/bd <= 0.15fc = 4.2 3.26 safe
Detailed Engineering in Connection with Rehabilitation

Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-013
and Up-Gradation to Four Laning of NH-31D from Km.
113+200 to km. 154+854 (Package-2-A) of
Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the State of West Designed by: Checked by: Date
Bengal on EPC mode Akshit S.Chatterjee
Avf = Vu = 8261 mm2

0.85*fsy*m
At = Hu 3221 mm2
.85*fy
Af = Vu*a+Hu*(h-d') 3460 mm2

0.85*fsy*d
As >=(Af+At) 6682 As final 8731 mm2

(tensile) >=(.667*Avf+At) 8731
>=(.04*f'c/fsy)*bd' 4222
provide 32 dia bars As provided 10450 mm2 OK
Nos 13 spacing 102 mm
Ah >=0.5As 4366 Ah final 4366 mm2

spacing of hor bars below top As = within full depth
provide 16 dia bars
Legged 4 spacing 102
Nos. 7 Ah prov 5627 mm2 OK
vert spacing 202 mm c/c
Fed 492 ton > Vrd,c 150.8 ton Vert Stirrups reqd
Av (vert stirrrup) >= 0.5*F Ed /(fyd) = 1574 mm2
Provide 8 Legged 16 mm dia 2 Set vertically

Upto face of piercap
Av prov 3215 mm2 OK
of West Bengal on EPC mode
Akshit S.Chatterjee
Torsion check for Long Direction in One span dislodged case:

114 Torsion TED KN-m 4240
115 q 45
116 Sin q 0.707
117 Cos q 0.707
118 D at pedestal location m 1.08
119 B at pedestal location m 4.10
120 Area (A) at pedestal location m^2 4.43
121 Outer perimeter (u) m 10.36
122 tef (m) only for one outer web m 0.428
123 Ak m^2 2.40
124 TRd, max = KN-m 8544
125 Only Torsion UR 0.496
128 If q = 45 deg, both Ast and Asl for Torsion will be same.
129 Ast / st = TED / (2*Ak*fyd*cot q) (mm2/mm). 1.847 Only 1 Leg of outer closed link will be considered
130 Provided Bar Dia mm 25 Outer closed stirrup
131 Spacing mm 150
132 Ast/st provided (mm2/mm). 3.271
133 OK
134 AsL / sL = TED *cot q/ (2*Ak*fyd) (mm2/mm). 1.847
135 Width of pier cap mm 4100
136 AsL reqd (mm2) 7572.2
137 Required Ast (mm2) 44714 Bars are uniformly distrubuted along the width
138 Provided Ast (mm2) 36586 OK
139 Depth of pier cap 1081

mm
AsL reqd (mm2) 1997.2
Provided Ast (at bottom) (mm2) 2011.1 16 dia. 10 no.s OK
Design of Pier Cap

DESIGN OF TEST PILES
Document
LOUIS BERGER no.
4800197-GGN-
Detailed Engineering in Connection with Rehabilitation and Job No 4800197
DD-045
Up-Gradation to Four Laning of NH-31D from Km. 113+200
to km. 154+854 (Package-2-A) of Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari
Akhil Madhusudan
Design of Test Piles for MNB at Ch. 134+814 29-11-2019
PIER PILES
REINFORCEMENT PROVIDED IN TEST PILE
It is proposed to provide following reinforcement (Grade Fe500 having minimum elongation of 14.5% &
conforming to IS: 1786) in the test pile:
For Piles under pier location:

nos. of24 20 mm dia (i.e. min of 0.4%)
nos. of 0 20 mm dia
Total Pt = 0.43 %
INITIAL VERTICAL LOAD TEST ON PILES
WORKING VERTICAL LOAD (SAFE LOAD) ON FREE HEADED PILES
For piles, V = 500 t (SLS)
TEST LOAD (ULTIMATE LOAD) ON FREE HEADED PILES
For piles, Vu = 2.5 x 500 = 1250 t.
FOR VERTICALLY LOADED PILES
Same test pile as used in lateral load test shall be used. Hence, reinforcement proposed is Pt =0.43%
Under vertical load compression in concrete governs
We consider the Ultimate load on pile
Vu = 1250 t
2
A= 1.7671 m (for 1500mm dia pile section)
2 2
c = Vu/A = 707.36 t/m < 1680 t/m for M35.
Hence OK

GGN DD 013

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

GGN DD 013

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DESIGN REPORT – MAJOR BRIDGE 147+533 Jan 2019

DETAILED ENGINEERING IN CONNECTION WITH REHABILITATION AND

CLIENT: NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA (NHAI)

CONTRACTOR: SIMPLEX INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.

DESIGN REPORT – MAJOR BRIDGE 123+518.5

Document Title Design Report – Major Bridge 123+518.5

Pier-P5 for Major Bridge at chainage - 123+518.5

1 Input, Load Calculations, Design forces

2 Pier Section Design

3 Pile Base Pressure Check

4 Pile SLS check

5 Pile ULS Check

6 Pile Structural Desgin

Top of pier 0.75

Finished Road Level (FRL) at the centre of Pier = 67.354 m

Pile cap bottom level / Founding level = 54.53 m

Max depth of scour For Pier from FSL (Ref: ANNEXURE-I)

Overall Length Span 1 = 45.69 m

Overall Length Span 2 = 45.69 m

Crash barrier Height = 1.00 m

Wearing Coat thickness = 0.1 m

Effective Length of span 1 = 43.29 m

Effective Length of span 2 = 43.29 m

Height of Pier from top of Pile Cap = 7.73 m =+64.504-56.775

Height of Pier below GL = 0.92 m

Load from Span 2

Total reaction on pier from two spans 12676 kN

Fixed SIDL ( crash barrier+services)

Variable SIDL(Wearing coat+future overlay)

1.2.1 Governing Load cases for Live Load

Case 1 (Maximum Axial Force case) Without any reduction factor

Case 2 (Maximum Longitudinal Moment case)-

Case 3 (Maximum Transverse Moment case)

No.of vehicles on span = 1 nos.

Left side Right side

S.No Description \ Type of Pier P1 P2 P3 P4

3 LL Reaction Without any reduction factor 2520 2520 0 0

Total Horizontal force normal 1171 kN

Design Longitudinal Force

Design Longitudinal Force - seismic

Height of the C.G of Superstructure from soffit (DL+SIDL) (h) = 1.38 m

Stiffness - Longitudinal (3EIL/L3) K1L = 413691 kN/m =3×32000×1000×2.333/(8.15)^3

Pile - Diameter = 1.50 m

Pile - Length ( L1+Lf) = 13.4 m

Number of pile per pier location "n" = 9 Nos.

S.No Description DL SIDL

1.4.3 Calculation of Seismic coefficient in the Transverse direction

S.No Description Load (kN) Remark

1 Dead Load 12676 1.1

1.5 Centrifugal force

1.6 Wind Load

For height of 10.63m as per IRC:6-2017, Table:4 wind pressure is as below,

Table:4 wind pressure is for basic wind speed 33m/s

Wind speed in Delhi location = 36 m/s

I) For Superstructure (as per Cl.209.3.3 of IRC:6-2017)

Gust Factor (G) for spans upto 150m = 2.0

Transverse wind load (FT) = Pz x A1 x G x CD

Width of Superstructure = 16.0 m

Lift Coefficient (CL) = 0.75

Vertical wind load (FV) = Pz x A3 x G x CL

(-ve sign indicates upward direction of wind force) = -853 kN

II) For Live load (as per Cl.209.3.3 of IRC:6-2017)