Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Flow Measurement
ENGN 2620-1: Thermofluids II – Fluid Mechanics
Phong Trinh – 317726
Group # 5
Date Lab Performed: Jan 15, 2020
Date Report Submitted: Jan 31, 2020
ENGN 2620 Group # 5 Phong Trinh – 317726
1. Introduction
In this experiment, the student will have an opportunity to familiarize with the flow measurement
equipment which is one of the typical methods of measuring the discharge of an incompressible
fluid. Furthermore, the students can deeply understand the principle and applications of the
Steady-Flow Energy Equation and Bernoulli's Equation through this experiment. The discharge
flow in this lab is determined by using a Venturi meter, an orifice plate meter, and a rotameter.
Those discharge flow values will be compared to a known standard flow based on a measured flow
volume and time. Moreover, Head losses associated with each meter are also investigated and
compared as well as those arising in a rapid enlargement and a 90° elbow in this experiment.
2. Objective
There are two main objectives of this experiment including:
• Measure the discharge flow by using a venturi meter, an orifice meter, and a rotameter.
Those measure values will be compared to a known standard volumetric flow rate based on
a measured flow volume and time.
• Investigate the head losses associated with a venturi meter, an orifice meter, and rotameter.
3. Theory
General Principles
The Bernoulli’s equation is an approximate relation between pressure, velocity, and elevation, and
is valid in regions of steady, incompressible flow where net frictional forces are negligible. The
Bernoulli equation can be viewed as an expression of mechanical energy balance and can be stated
that the sum of the kinetic, potential, and flow energies of a fluid particle is constant along a
streamline during steady flow when compressibility and frictional effects are negligible.
P V&
+ + z = H = constant (along a streamline)
ρg 2g
§ P/ρg is the pressure head; it represents the height of a fluid column thatproduces the static
pressure P.
§ V2/2g is the velocity head; it represents the elevation needed for a fluid to reach the velocity
V during frictionless free fall.
However, in reality, factors such as friction and viscosity always exist, it can lead to energy losses.
Therefore, we should take those factors into account while we are investigating the energy of a
process. Therefore, for steady, adiabatic flow of an incompressible fluid, Bernoulli’s equation can be
writen in the form:
∆H9& : head loss; In general, head loss is a loss in pressure head due to the viscosity of a fluid and
obstructions to a fluid such as pipe elbows, valves.
Calculations of Discharge
The venturi meter, the orifice plate meter and the rotameter are all dependent upon Bernoulli’s
equation for their principle of operation. From Bernoulli’s equation, the flow rate equations
required to determine the flow through the venture and orifice meters can be derived by applying
the appropriate assumptions to arrive at Equations below.
Venturi meter
9/& 9/&
&= D? D@ &=
Q = ABVB = AB ;< ? B C E= − E= GH = AB ;< ? B (hK − hL )H
>( @ )A >( @ )A
?? ??
• AB and AA are are the cross-sectional areas at points A and B respectively. Unit: m2
• hA and hB are elevaton are elevation compared to the reference at point A and B
respectively. Unit (m).
Orifice Meter
9/& 9/&
&= DN DM &=
Q = AFVF = KAF ;< ? B CE= − E=GH = AB ;< ? B (hK − hL )H
9>( M )A >( @ )A
?N ??
• AE and AF are are the cross-sectional areas at points E and F respectively. Unit: m2
• hA and hB are elevaton are elevation compared to the reference at point A and B
respectively. Unit (m).
Rotameters
In this experiment, the head losses ΔH occurs the various components including ΔHAC for the
venturi meter, ΔHEF for the orifice plate, ΔHHI for the rotameter; ΔHCD for the wide-angle diffuser,
and ΔHGH for the elbow. In general, the head loss is determined from the relevant manometer tube
OP
readings by this equation QA
with ΔH is head loss due to friction across the device. This shown
AR
In positions respectively A–B–C (Figure 3), the diameter of this section is gradually decreasing.
After that, the diameter of the tube will rapidly increase from C to D and the diameter is maintained
along a settling length and through an orifice meter (E-F) (see Figure 3). The water then flows
around an elbow bend (G-H) and up through a rotameter-type flowmeter (H-I). The equipment has
eleven manometers, and nine out of eleven are connected to tappings in the pipework and two are
left free for other measurements.
5. Procedure
Firstly, the apparatus valve is opened and adjusted until the reading of the rotameter presents
approximately 20 mm. When the flow is steady, students measure the volumetric flow rate using
the Hydraulic Bench and also record the readings of the various manometers from A to I. The
standard volumetric flow rate can be found by measuring the time taken to fill the Hydraulic Bench
reservoir to a known volume of water as outlined in its manual. The experiment is repeated with
the same procedure until reaching the maximum pressure values of the manometer.
Weigh Tank
The mass flow rate (kg/s) for the weigh tank based on the known standard volumetric flow rate is
determined to be
YR
U (V=) E( [ )\(U[ )
ṁ = = Z W(X)
W(X)
Based on the data on table 2, we know that V = 5L = 0.005m3, 𝜌 = 1000 kg/m3, t = 1min 41s = 101s
YR
U (V=) 9```C [G`.``b(U[ )
à ṁ = = Z
= 0.0495 kg/s
W(X) 9`9(X)
Venturi Meter
The mass flow rate (kg/s) for the venturi meter can be determined to be
9/& 9/&
&= D? D@ &=
Q = ABVB = AB cd ? eC − E= Gf = AB cd ? e (hK − hL )f
>(?@ )A E= >(?@ )A
? ?
K@ (9gUU)A j &
à
K?
= (&gUU)A = 0.38 and AL = π C k@G = 5.024 x 10>b m&
à Q = 9.62 x 10-4 [(ℎt − ℎu )]9/& = 9.62 x 10-4 (0.295 – 0.293)1/2 = 4.30 x 10-5 (m3/s)
V= x[
à The mass of flow will be: ṁ = 𝜌𝑄 = 1000 CU[G . 4.30 x 10>b C y
G = 0.043 𝑘𝑔/𝑠
Orifice Meter
The mass flow rate (kg/s) for the venturi meter can be determined to be
9/& 9/&
&= DN DM &=
Q = AFVF = KAF ;< ? B CE= − E=GH = AB ;< ? B (hK − hL )H
9>( M )A >( @ )A
?N ??
j & t• (&`xx)A
à AF = π C kM G = 7.85 x 10>b m& and = (b9.•xx)A = 0.148
t€
à The mass of flow will be: ṁ = 𝜌𝑄 = 0.846(ℎ‚ − ℎƒ )9/& 𝑘𝑔/𝑠 with 𝜌 = 1000 𝑘𝑔/𝑚…
‰Š
à ṁ = 𝜌𝑄 = 0.846(ℎ‚ − ℎƒ )9/& y
= 0.846(0.296 − 0.292)9/& = 0.053 kg/s
Rotameter
The mass flow rate (kg/s) for the rotameter can be determined by reading value from the typical
rotameter calibration curve provided.
Based on the table 2, h‹ŒW•UŽWŽ‹ = 10 mm = 1 cm. From the typical rotameter calibration curve
provided à ṁ ≈ 0.065 kg/s
Calculating in a similar way or using excel application, the mass flow rate (kg/s) for the weigh tank,
venturi meter, the orifice meter, and the rotameter is shown in the table below.
ṁ (kg/s)
Based on table 1 above, mass flow rates determined for the venturi meter, the orifice meter, and the
rotameter are just slightly different. The different can be explained by head losses ΔH due to friction
occuring when flulid is moving through the components of the apparatus.
Those mass flow rates determined for the venturi meter, the orifice meter, and the rotameter are
also just slightly different from the known standard volumetric flow rate, exception for tenth test.
The maximum percent difference between them can be calulate from tenth test by equation as :
The reason for the significantly different in the tenth test probably is that error occurred during
recording information from the experiment
Based the raw data of rotameter from table 3 and the mass flow rate (kg/s) of rotameter from table,
the graph l in milimeter as a function of the rotameter’s mass flow rate is shown below.
160
Rotameter Scale Reading (mm)
140
y = 421.15x - 11.338
120 R² = 0.9639
100
80
60
40
20
0
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45
Mass flow (kg/s)
As can be seen, the graph of l in milimeter versus mass of flow (kg/s) in this experiment is
approximately linear with the given equation as y = 421.15x – 11.338 (Figure 5). In general, R2 is a
statistical measure of how close the data are to the fitted regression line. The value of R2 on the
graph above is equal to 0.9639, which is really close to 1.0. This means all the point (l, mass flow) is
almost perfectly fit on the straight line shown on the graph (Figure 5). This graph is same shape to
the typical rotameter calibration curve provided but the slope of the line is lower. As can be seen,
the results of this experiment show that l (mm) increases with mass flow rate of water in
rotameter. As can be seen, the results of this experiment show that l (mm) increases with mass flow
rate of water in rotameter.
Venturi Meter
D D
ΔHAC = hA – hC = C E=? − E=¢G = (295 mm) – (296 mm) = 2 mm. This can be made dimensionless by
\A
dividing it by the inlet kinetic head &Š? which can be determined to be
9/&
K 9 D? D@ t (9gxx)A
VK& = (K@ )& cd ? eC − E= Gf with t£ = (&gxx)A = 0.38
? 9>(?@ ) A E= ¤
?
\A D D
à the inlet kinetic head &Š? = 0.167C E=? − E=@G = 0.167 (hA – hB) = 0.167 (295 – 293)mm = 0.334mm
&
Therefore, head loss = `.……k = 5.99 inlet kinetic heads
Orifice Meter
Firstly, we find the value of ΔHEF . According to H10 Flow Measurement manual:
The orifice plate DE = 51.9 mm is approximately twice the venturi inlet diameter DC = 26.0 mm,
Therefore the orifice inlet kineric head is approximately 1/16 that of the venturi which is equal
0.334/16 = 0.0209 mm.
Romater
Firstly, we find the value of ΔHHI . According to H10 Flow Measurement manual:
Since the area ratio, inlet to outlet, of the diffuser is 1:4, the outlet kinetic head is 1/16 of the inlet
kinetic head. We know that inlet kinetic head = 0.334mm à the corresponding outlet kinetic head
is (0.334/16)mm = 0.0209 mm. According to H10 Flow Measurement manual:
ΔHCD = (hC – hD) + (inlet kinetic head – outlet kinetic head) = (297 -296) + (0.334 – 0.0209) =
1.3131 mm of water
The outline kinetic head is now 2.8 times the inlet kinetic head
Calculating in a similar way or using excel application, the mass flow rate (kg/s) for other test is
shown in the table below.
According the experiment data, most of the Head loss occurred when fluid was moving through
oriffice meter. An obstruction of orifice plates resulting in increased friction can be a reason why
most of the lossd occurred in oriffice meter.
7. Conclusions
Because head losses ΔH due to friction occurrs when flulid is moving through the components of
the apparatus, mass flow rates for the venturi meter, the orifice meter, the rotameter and standard
volumetric flow rate are slightly different. The maximum percent difference between mass flow
rate of rotameter and standard volumetric flow rate can be calulate from the tenth test which 90%.
The significantly different occurs beacuse in the tenth test, probably error occurred during
recording information from the experiment
The graph of l (mm) Vs Mass of flow (kg/s) for Rotameter is same shape to the typical rotameter
calibration curve provided but the slope of the line is lower. This mean the rate of change of l (mm)
repect to mass of flow (kg/s) of typical rotameter is faster than the one in the experiment. The
graph show that l (mm) increases with mass flow rate of water in rotameter.
Most of Head loss occurred when fluid was moving through oriffice meter due to an obstruction of
orifice plates resulting in increased friction can be a reason why most of the lossd occurred in
oriffice meter.
References
[1]. Çengel, Yunus A, Robert H. Turner, and John M. Cimbala. Fundamentals of Thermal-Fluid
Sciences 5th edition. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2008. Print.
[2]. TecQuipment. H10 Flow Measurement . TecQuipment Ltd, 1999. Print.
Appendices
Table 2: Raw Data for the Tests