Applied Heat Transfer (Jan-2011)

stion (2)

)by Rahma Hussein( .2.1

size of pipe &tube ‫الفرق بين ال‬
‫ ده القطر اللى بروح للتاجر وقوله عايزه ده وبيكون رقم مقرب للقطر الخارجى بس بيكون عدد‬Nominal Iron Pipe Size ‫بالنسبه لل‬
‫ وده علشان‬schedule number ‫ وكمان فى حاجه اسمها ال‬pipe ‫قريب من العدد الصحيح او لنص او الربع وهكدا وده خاص بال‬
‫ باخد‬50 ‫اقدر احدد السمك بتاعى وبالتالى اقدر احدد القطر الداخلى وده بيكون معتمد على الضغط لو كان عندى ضغط اقل من‬
NIPS‫ ومعايا حاجتين ال‬pipe ‫ (يعنى انا بروح للتاجر علشان اشترى‬sch. =80 ‫ باخد‬50atm ‫ اما لو اعلى من‬sch.num =40
 ,Schedule number
Birmingham wire Gage ‫ التسميه هتختلف الزم اكون عارف القطر الخارجى واكون عارف ال‬tube ‫اما بقى لو بتكلم على‬
‫ بتكون كبيره السمك بيكون صغير يعنى عكسى مع‬BWG ‫ وناخد بالنا اما‬tube‫(وده علشان احدد السمك بتاعى فى ال‬BWG)
 BWG‫بعضه(يعنى بروح للتاجر وانا معايا القطر الخارجى وال‬
 ‫يعنى لو جت مقارنه بينهم‬
pipe :use NIPS &schedule to know size of pipe
tube:use ID &BWG to know the size of tube

2.5.
4’ and 8’ tubes sharply increase the 1 st cost per ft2 , but long tubes are difficult to handle during cleaning
and maintenance of the exchanger, specially at high elevations; 4’ and 8’ tubes are used in this respect.
(P.97 - paragraph 5)

2.7. (part2) Why do we impose baffle spacing extremes?

Because baffle spacing larger than the maximum is practically ineffective, while spacing closer than the
minimum leads to excessive pressure drop.
(P. 99 – Paragraph 2)

2.8. What's the most effective means of overcoming differential expansion proplems of multi-pass
exchangers?
The floating head, which provides the most satisfactory solution to exchanger differential expansion
problems, is commonly used with multi-pass exchangers.
(P.115 – Paragraph 3)

2.11.
a) By increasing number of passes
b) By decreasing baffle spacing
2.12.
The flow could be split into two parallel streams inside the shell of the exchanger so that the shell-side
flow rate is halved, the mass velocity is then halved, and the total pressure drop inside the shell is that
of either of the parallel streams. (+drawing the split flow arrangement)
(P. 122)

2.13.
Here we will use exhaust steam for heating from 208 F to 218 F, and process steam for heating from 218
F to 250 F.
applying … Moil*Cp*deltaT = Msteam*latent heat
Exhaust steam:
49600*0.5*(218-208) = Mexhaust*960.1 >>> Mexhaust=258.306 lb/hr
Process Steam:
49600*0.5*(250-218) = Mprocess*888.8 >>> Mprocess=982.889 lb/hr
(check P.123)