Professional Documents
Culture Documents
10 CE133P Ultimate Strength Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns (Robles)
10 CE133P Ultimate Strength Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns (Robles)
S2
Long Columns. Long columns are more slender
thus fails nby buckling of the member (bending
deformations increase with secondary moments, S3
P – Δ effect).
L1 L2
ULTIMATE STRENGTH DESIGN : R E I N F O R C E D C O N C R E T E C O L U M N
DESIGN PRINCIPLE
Wu
Girder
Column
ULTIMATE STRENGTH DESIGN : R E I N F O R C E D C O N C R E T E C O L U M N
DESIGN PRINCIPLE
RD
L3
L2
L1
Ground
ULTIMATE STRENGTH DESIGN : R E I N F O R C E D C O N C R E T E C O L U M N
DESIGN PRINCIPLE
RD
L3
L2
L1
Ground
ULTIMATE STRENGTH DESIGN : R E I N F O R C E D C O N C R E T E C O L U M N
DESIGN PRINCIPLE
REINFORCEMENT REQUIREMENTS
LONGITUDINAL BARS– provided to sustain compressive due
to axial load and tensile forces due to bending moments
Smax ≤ 48dties
Min. dimension
Spiral
∅?U = E. VE
cc – compression controlled
tc – tension controlled
ULTIMATE STRENGTH DESIGN : R E I N F O R C E D C O N C R E T E C O L U M N
DESIGN PRINCIPLE
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
W X = E . ^ G _ (U ( a : − a c d ) + = > ? _ g
NSCP PROVISION
ac+ ac-
Plastic
Centroid
Geometric
Centroid
p'
pq'
no no
L
no
As eccentricity increases
• area of concrete decreases (c, Cc and Cs
DECREASE)
PC
• Tensile stress in bars increases (T
INCREASES)
• Pn decreases, Mn increases
At balanced condition, e = eb
• Extreme tension bars yield (fs = fy)
As eccentricity increases
• area of concrete decreases (c, Cc and Cs
DECREASE)
PC
• Tensile stress in bars increases (T
INCREASES)
• Pn decreases, Mn increases
At balanced condition, e = eb
• Extreme tension bars yield (fs = fy)
c
εs
Beyond balanced condition, extreme T force
becomes limited (T = Asfy) (Mn decreases)
0.003
For very large eccentricities, column behaves like
a beam (C = T) (Pn = 0)
ULTIMATE STRENGTH DESIGN : R E I N F O R C E D C O N C R E T E C O L U M N
DESIGN PRINCIPLE
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
no
Capacity of Columns with Eccentricity
As eccentricity increases
• area of concrete decreases (c, Cc and Cs
DECREASE)
PC
• Tensile stress in bars increases (T
INCREASES)
• Pn decreases, Mn increases
At balanced condition, e = eb
• Extreme tension bars yield (fs = fy)
c
εs
Beyond balanced condition, extreme T force
becomes limited (T = Asfy) (Mn decreases)
0.003
For very large eccentricities, column behaves like
a beam (C = T) (Pn = 0)
ULTIMATE STRENGTH DESIGN : R E I N F O R C E D C O N C R E T E C O L U M N
DESIGN PRINCIPLE
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
no
Capacity of Columns with Eccentricity
As eccentricity increases
• area of concrete decreases (c, Cc and Cs
DECREASE)
PC
• Tensile stress in bars increases (T
INCREASES)
• Pn decreases, Mn increases
At balanced condition, e = eb
• Extreme tension bars yield (fs = fy)
c
εs
Beyond balanced condition, extreme T force
becomes limited (T = Asfy) (Mn decreases)
0.003
For very large eccentricities, column behaves like
a beam (C = T) (Pn = 0)
ULTIMATE STRENGTH DESIGN : R E I N F O R C E D C O N C R E T E C O L U M N
DESIGN PRINCIPLE
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
Analysis of Column Strength under Combined Axial and Bending . 4
a
s.
pq'
4′
nM
u
S=
0r
+
J
M'
M′c
ULTIMATE STRENGTH DESIGN : R E I N F O R C E D C O N C R E T E C O L U M N
DESIGN PRINCIPLE
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
Analysis of Column Strength under Combined Axial and Bending
ULTIMATE STRENGTH DESIGN : R E I N F O R C E D C O N C R E T E C O L U M N
DESIGN PRINCIPLE
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
5 LOADING CONDITIONS PURE AXIAL
1. Pure Axial
∅ W j = ∅ k [ E . ^ G _ (U ( a : − a c d ) + = > ? _ g ]
2. Balanced Condition ∅ v j = ∅ Wj ( w x y C = E . \ E z )
“h” is always perpendicular
3. Compression Controlled fPn £ faPo to the axis of bending
f = 0.65
4. Tension Controlled TIED
a = 0.80
5. Pure Bending f = 0.75
SPIRAL
a = 0.85
BALANCED CONDITION
3. Compression Controlled
Tension Controlled
4. Tension Controlled
Assume value for “c” , c ≤ c5 ; c5 = 3d/8
5. Pure Bending Extreme T is beyond yielding (fs = fy) use ϕ = 0.90
Therefore, Pn < Pnb , Mn < Mnb
Pure Bending
d
SECTION PROPERTIES:
d' fc’ = 21 MPa
fy = 275 Mpa
b = 250 mm
b h = 400mm
dties = 10 mm
cc = 40 mm
db = 16 mm
d = 342 mm
h
d’ = 58 mm
ULTIMATE STRENGTH DESIGN : R E I N F O R C E D C O N C R E T E C O L U M N
DESIGN PRINCIPLE
P
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS p ress
io n
Co m
Ax ial
Column Interaction Diagram Pure
Po en ding
imu mB
Min
Interaction diagrams are useful for
re
studying the strengths of columns led Failu
o l
n C ontr = 0.002
with varying proportions of loads sio }y
pres , }t <
ϕ⍺Po Com c > c b
and moments. Any combination of
loading that falls inside the curve is Desoign strength with
satisfactory, whereas any ϕ = 0.65
ed
o n troll .005
ion C }t = 0
Tens c < c b ,
ϕ = 0.90
g
B endin
Pure
M
Min ϕMn
10.6 Design and Analysis of Eccentrically Loaded Columns Using Interactio
ULTIMATE STRENGTH DESIGN : R E I N F O R C E D C O N C R E T E C O L U M N
DESIGN PRINCIPLE 2.0
INTERACTION DIAGRAM L4–60.7 h
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS z = 0.08 fc' = 4 ksi h
1.8 fy = 60 ksi
Column Interaction Diagram 0.07 = 0.7
Kmax
1.6
Interaction diagrams are useful for studying 0.06
Pn
the strengths of columns with varying 0.05 e
1.4
proportions of loads and moments. Any
0.04
combination of loading that falls inside the 1.2 fsfy = 0
0.03 This line of constant
curve is satisfactory, whereas any combination
Kn = Pn fc' Ag
eh = 0.5 was plotted
0.02 by authors for use in
falling outside the curve represents failure. 1.0
0.25 solving Example 10.7.
0.01
0.8
0.50
0.6
0.75
0.4
1.0
t = 0.0035
0.2 t = 0.0050
0.0
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55
Rn = Pnefc' Agh
ULTIMATE STRENGTH DESIGN : R E I N F O R C E D C O N C R E T E C O L U M N
DESIGN PRINCIPLE
Calculate the nominal axial load capacity of the column shown that can be applied at an eccentricity of
200 mm. Use f’c = 21 MPa and fy = 420 MPa.
450 mm 75 mm
4 – 25 mm
4 – 25 mm
400 mm
600 mm
0.0
ULTIMATE STRENGTH DESIGN : R E I N F O R C E D C O N C R E T E C O L U M N
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60
DESIGN PRINCIPLE Rn = Pn e / f / c Ag h
2.4
INTERACTION DIAGRAM L3-60.7 h
g = 0.08 h
f /c = 3 ksi
2.2 fy = 60 ksi
0.07 = 0.7
2.0
Kmax
0.06
1.8 Pn
e
0.05
1.6
0.04
1.4 fs/fy = 0
0.03
Ag
1.2
c
/
Kn = Pn / f
0.02 0.25
1.0
0.01
0.50
0.8
0.6 0.75
0.4
t = 0.0 1.0
t = 0.00035
t = 0.00 4
0.2 5
0.0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
Rn = Pn e / f / c Ag h
ULTIMATE STRENGTH DESIGN : R E I N F O R C E D C O N C R E T E C O L U M N
DESIGN PRINCIPLE 2.4
INTERACTION DIAGRAM L3-60.8 h
g = 0.08
h
f /c = 3 ksi
2.2
fy = 60 ksi
0.07
= 0.8
2.0
0.06 Kmax
1.8 Pn
e
0.05
1.6
0.04
fs/fy = 0
1.4
0.03
Ag
1.2
c
/
0.02 0.25
Kn = Pn / f
1.0
0.01
0.50
0.8
0.6 0.75
0.4
1.0
t = 0.0035
t = 0.004
t = 0.00 5
0.2
0.0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
R =P e/f/ A h
= 0. 04
0.2 005 1.0
2.4
INTERACTION DIAGRAM L3-60.7 h
g = 0.08 h
A rectangular column shown in the interaction 2.2
f /c = 3 ksi
fy = 60 ksi
diagram is acted upon by the following loads: 0.07 = 0.7
2.0
• Axial load due to dead load = 450 kN Kmax
0.06
1.4 fs/fy = 0
The column is to be analyzed and designed using
0.03
Ag
the strength method. Use b = 400 mm, h = 600 1.2
c
/
Kn = Pn / f
0.02 0.25
mm, and • = 0.70.
1.0
0.01
0.50
0.8
a. Determine the eccentricity of the column, in
millimeters, 0.6 0.75
0.0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
Rn = Pn e / f / c Ag h