Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/235974549
CITATIONS READS
7 379
3 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Anna V. Korolkova on 20 May 2014.
Key words and phrases: Maxwell’s equations, tensorial formalism, covariant coordinate-
free form, covariant coordinate form.
1. Introduction
Problems of waveguide mathematical modelling sometimes need curvilinear coor-
dinate system to be applied. The choice of specific coordinate system is defined by
the cross-section of the waveguide.
Usually the description of waveguide model is based on Maxwell’s equations in
Cartesian coordinate system. With the help of vector transformation property Maxwell’s
equations are rearranged for sertain coordinate system (spherical or cylindrical). But
in some problems, e.g. simulation of a heavy-particle accelerator, the waveguide may
has the form of a cone or a hyperboloid. Another example of a waveguide with a com-
plex form is the Luneberg lens, which has the form of a part of a sphere or a cylinder
attached to a planar waveguide. Therefore in the case of a waveguide with a complex
form the Maxwell’s equations should be written in a arbitrary curvilinear coordinate
system.
It’s well established to apply vectorial formalism to Maxwell’s equations. But in
this case Maxwell’s equations in a curvilinear coordinate system are lengthy. In [1]
some preliminary work on tensorial formalism resulting in a more compact form of
Maxwell’s equations is made. The tensorial formalism has a mathematical apparatus
which allows to use covariant coordinate-free form of Maxwell’s equations. In this
case the transition to a certain coordinate system may be done on the final stage of
research writing down the results. But tensorial formalism can’t be directly applied to
Maxwell’s equations because the relation between vectorial and tensorial formalisms
should be proven before.
Different forms of Maxwell’s equations are used in problems of finding Hamilton-
ian of electromagnetic field applied in variational integrator (particularly, symplectic
integrator) construction. The main task is the fulfillment of the condition of sym-
plectic structure conservation during equations discretization. The several forms of
Maxwell’s equations are used in electromagnetic field Hamiltonian derivation:
– 3-vectors;
– momentum representation (complex form is used);
– momentum representation.
As a summary the main goals of the article may be formulated: to show connection
between vectorial and tensorial formalisms (section 2); to apply tensorial formalism
for different forms of Maxwell’s equations (section 4); to verify the obtained results
by representing Maxwell’s equations in spherical and cylindrical coordinate systems
(section 5).
In tensor form:
d𝑠2 = 𝑔𝑖𝑗 d𝑥𝑖 d𝑥𝑗 , 𝑖, 𝑗 = 1, 𝑛, (1)
where 𝑔𝑖𝑗 — metric tensor.
In vector form: ′ ′
d𝑠2 = 𝑔𝑖′ 𝑗 ′ d𝑠𝑖 d𝑠𝑗 , 𝑖′ , 𝑗 ′ = 1, 𝑛. (2)
In the case of orthogonal basis, (2) has the form:
′ ′
d𝑠2 = 𝑔𝑖′ 𝑖′ d𝑠𝑖 d𝑠𝑖 , 𝑖′ = 1, 𝑛. (3)
and then ′ 𝑖′
𝑓 𝑖 = 𝑓 𝑖 ℎ𝑖 , 𝑖, 𝑖′ = 1, 𝑛.
and then
1
𝑓𝑖′ = 𝑓𝑖 𝑖′
, 𝑖, 𝑖′ = 1, 𝑛.
ℎ𝑖
Let’s present the differential operators in the components (for connections associ-
ated with metric).
The expression for gradient:
𝑖
(grad 𝜙)𝑖 = (grad 𝜙)𝑖 𝛿𝑖 , (grad 𝜙)𝑖 = ∇𝑖 𝜙 = 𝜕𝑖 𝜙, 𝑖 = 1, 𝑛. (4)
or in components:
1
(︁√︀ )︁
div𝑓⃗ = √︀ 𝜕𝑖 |𝑔|𝑓 𝑖 , 𝑖 = 1, 𝑛. (6)
|𝑔|
(︀ )︀
Variable 𝑔 is det 𝑔𝑖𝑖 , 𝑖 = 1, 𝑛.
Because of the nonnegativity of radical expression and because of M4 𝑔 < 0 in
Minkowsky space let’s use the following notation |𝑔|.
The expression for rotor is valid only in E3 space:
(︁ )︁𝑖 [︁ ]︁ (︁ )︁𝑖 (︁ )︁𝑖
rot 𝑓⃗ = ∇, ⃗ 𝑓⃗ = rot 𝑓⃗ 𝛿𝑖𝑖 , rot 𝑓⃗ = 𝑒𝑖𝑗𝑘 ∇𝑗 𝑓𝑘 , 𝑖, 𝑗, 𝑘 = 1, 3, (7)
From (5) for divergence and (4) for gradient one can get Laplacian:
1
(︁√︀ )︁
Δ𝜙 = ∇𝑖 ∇𝑖 𝜙 = ∇𝑖 𝑔 𝑖𝑗 (grad 𝜙)𝑗 = ∇𝑖 𝑔 𝑖𝑗 𝜕𝑗 𝜙 = √︀ 𝜕𝑖 |𝑔|𝑔 𝑖𝑗 𝜕𝑗 𝜙 .
(︀ )︀ (︀ )︀ (︀ )︀
(8)
|𝑔|
Kulyabov D. S., Korolkova A. V., Korolkov V. I. Maxwell’s Equations in Ar . . . 99
⃗ and 𝐻
Here 𝐸 ⃗ — electric and magnetic intensities, ⃗𝑗 is the current density, 𝜌 is the
charge density, 𝑐 is the light velocity.
𝑒𝑖𝑗𝑘 ∇𝑗 𝐸𝑘 = −∇0 𝐵 𝑖 ;
∇𝑖 𝐷𝑖 = 4𝜋𝜌;
4𝜋 𝑖 (10)
𝑒𝑖𝑗𝑘 ∇𝑗 𝐻𝑘 = ∇0 𝐷𝑖 + 𝑗;
𝑐
∇𝑖 𝐵 𝑖 = 0.
Let’s rewrite the expression (9) in the tensorial formalism components with the
help of (7) and (6):
1 1
[︁ ]︁
√︀ 𝜕 𝑗 𝐸 𝑘 − 𝜕𝑘 𝐸 𝑗 = − 𝜕𝑡 𝐵 𝑖 , 𝑖, 𝑗, 𝑘 = 1, 3,
|𝑔 |
(3) 𝑐
(︂√︁ )︂
1
√︀ 𝜕𝑖 |𝑔 (3) |𝐷𝑖 = 4𝜋𝜌, 𝑖 = 1, 3,
|𝑔 (3) |
(11)
1 1 4𝜋 𝑖
[︁ ]︁
𝑖
𝜕 𝐻
𝑗 𝑘 − 𝜕 𝐻
𝑘 𝑗 = − 𝜕 𝐷 + 𝑗 , 𝑖, 𝑗, 𝑘 = 1, 3,
𝑐 𝑡
√︀
|𝑔 (3) | 𝑐
(︂√︁ )︂
1
√︀ 𝜕𝑖 |𝑔 (3) |𝐵 𝑖 = 0, 𝑖 = 1, 3.
|𝑔 | (3)
Let’s rewrite (9) with the help of electromagnetic field tensors 𝐹𝛼𝛽 and 𝐺𝛼𝛽 [5], [6,
p. 256, 263–264]:
4𝜋 𝛽
∇𝛼 𝐹 𝛼𝛽 = 𝑗 , (12)
𝑐
∇𝛼 𝐺𝛽𝛾 + ∇𝛽 𝐺𝛾𝛼 + ∇𝛾 𝐺𝛼𝛽 = 0, (13)
⎛ 0 𝐸1 𝐸2 𝐸3 ⎞ ⎛ 0 𝐷1 𝐷2 𝐷3 ⎞
⎜−𝐸1 0 −𝐵 3 𝐵2 ⎟ ⎜−𝐷1 0 −𝐻 3 𝐻2 ⎟
𝐹𝛼𝛽 =⎜ ⎟, 𝐺𝛼𝛽 =⎜ ⎟,
⎝−𝐸2 𝐵3 0 −𝐵 1 ⎠ ⎝−𝐷2 𝐻3 0 −𝐻 1 ⎠
−𝐸3 −𝐵 2 𝐵1 0 −𝐷3 −𝐻 2 𝐻1 0
100 Bulletin of PFUR. Series Mathematics. Information Sciences. Physics. No 1, 2012. Pp. 96–106
∇𝛼 * 𝐺𝛼𝛽 = 0, (14)
* 1
𝐺𝛼𝛽 = 𝑒𝛼𝛽𝛾𝛿 𝐺𝛾𝛿 , (15)
2
∇𝑖 (𝐾 𝑖 + 𝐿𝑖 ) = 4𝜋𝜌;
4𝜋 𝑖 (21)
−i∇0 (𝐾 𝑖 − 𝐿𝑖 ) + 𝑒𝑖𝑗𝑘 ∇𝑗 (𝐾𝑘 − 𝐿𝑘 ) = i 𝑗.
𝑐
𝐾 𝑖 = 𝐸 𝑖 + i𝐵 𝑖 = 𝐹 𝑖 , 𝐿𝑖 = 0. (22)
Kulyabov D. S., Korolkova A. V., Korolkov V. I. Maxwell’s Equations in Ar . . . 101
∇𝑖 𝐹 𝑖 = 4𝜋𝜌;
4𝜋 𝑖 (23)
−i∇0 𝐹 𝑖 + 𝑒𝑖𝑗𝑘 ∇𝑗 𝐹𝑘 = i 𝑗.
𝑐
Let’s note that the vector components 𝐸 𝑖 (𝑡, 𝑥𝑗 ) and 𝐸 𝑖 (𝑡, 𝑘𝑗 ), (similarly: 𝐻 𝑖 (𝑡, 𝑥𝑗 )
and 𝐻 𝑖 (𝑡, 𝑘𝑗 ), 𝐷𝑖 (𝑡, 𝑥𝑗 ) and 𝐷𝑖 (𝑡, 𝑘𝑗 ), 𝐵 𝑖 (𝑡, 𝑥𝑗 ) and 𝐵 𝑖 (𝑡, 𝑘𝑗 ), 𝑗 𝑖 (𝑡, 𝑥𝑗 ) and 𝑗 𝑖 (𝑡, 𝑘𝑗 ))
are used in different basises:
𝐸 𝑖 (𝑡, 𝑥𝑗 ) = 𝐸 𝑖 (𝑡, 𝑥𝑗 )𝛿𝑖𝑖 ,
^
𝐸 𝑖 (𝑡, 𝑘𝑗 ) = 𝐸 𝑖 (𝑡, 𝑘𝑗 )𝛿^𝑖𝑖 ,
where the basis 𝛿^𝑖𝑖 is given according to the vector 𝑘𝑖 . For all 𝑘𝑖 the independent basis
is defined and that is why one can use expressions under integral sign putting down
102 Bulletin of PFUR. Series Mathematics. Information Sciences. Physics. No 1, 2012. Pp. 96–106
Because of the complex form of the resulting equations the complex form of
Maxwell’s equations (18) is recommended to use
∫︁
1 𝑗
𝐹 𝑖 (𝑡, 𝑥𝑗 ) = √︀ d3 𝑘𝑗 𝐹 𝑖 (𝑡, 𝑘𝑗 )ei𝑘𝑗 𝑥 ,
(2𝜋)3
∫︁
1 𝑗
𝐺𝑖 (𝑡, 𝑥𝑗 ) = √︀ d3 𝑘𝑗 𝐺𝑖 (𝑡, 𝑘𝑗 )ei𝑘𝑗 𝑥 ,
(2𝜋)3
∫︁ (27)
1 𝑗
𝜌(𝑡, 𝑥𝑗 ) = √︀ d3 𝑘𝑗 𝜌(𝑡, 𝑘𝑗 )ei𝑘𝑗 𝑥 ,
(2𝜋)
∫︁
1 𝑗
𝑗 𝑖 (𝑡, 𝑥𝑗 ) = √︀ d3 𝑘𝑗 𝑗 𝑖 (𝑡, 𝑘𝑗 )ei𝑘𝑗 𝑥 .
(2𝜋)3
The tensor of electromagnetic field 𝐹𝛼𝛽 and its components 𝐹𝛼𝛽 , 𝛼, 𝛽 = 0, 3 may
be considered in spinor form [2, p. 153] (and similarly for 𝐺𝛼𝛽 ):
𝐹𝛼𝛽 = 𝐹𝐴𝐴′ 𝐵𝐵 ′ ;
′ ′ (28)
𝐹𝛼 𝛽 = 𝐹𝐴 𝐴′ 𝐵 𝐵 ′ 𝑔𝛼 𝐴 𝐴 𝑔𝛽 𝐵 𝐵 , 𝐴, 𝐴′ , 𝐵, 𝐵 ′ = 0, 1, 𝛼, 𝛽 = 0, 3,
′
where 𝑔𝛼 𝐴 𝐴 , 𝛼 = 0, 3, — Infeld–Van der Waerden symbols defined in real spinor basis
𝜀𝐴 𝐵 in the following way [2, p. 161]:
′ ′ ′
𝑔𝛼 𝐴 𝐴 := 𝑔𝛼 𝛼 𝜀𝐴 𝐴 𝜀𝐴′ 𝐴 , 𝑔𝐴 𝐴′ 𝛼 := 𝑔 𝛼 𝛼 𝜀𝐴 𝐴 𝜀𝐴 𝐴′ , (29)
(︂ )︂ (︂ )︂
0 1 𝐴 𝐵 𝐵 1 0
𝜀𝐴 𝐵 = 𝜀𝐴 ′ 𝐵 ′ = , 𝜀𝐴 𝜀𝐴 = 𝜀𝐴 = . (30)
−1 0 0 1
Let’s write Maxwell’s equations using the spinors.
The tensor 𝐹𝛼𝛽 is real and antisymmetric, it can be represented in the form
Similarly
𝐺𝛼𝛽 = 𝛾𝐴𝐵 𝜀𝐴′ 𝐵 ′ + 𝜀𝐴𝐵 𝛾¯𝐴′ 𝐵 ′ , (32)
* 𝛼𝛽 𝐴𝐵 𝐴′ 𝐵 ′ 𝐴𝐵 𝐴′ 𝐵 ′
𝐺 = −i𝛾 𝜀 + i𝜀 𝛾¯ . (33)
The spinor form of Maxwell’s equations system in vacuum can be written in the
form of one equation [2, p. 385]:
′ 2𝜋 𝐵𝐵 ′
∇𝐴𝐵 𝜙𝐵
𝐴 = 𝑗 . (37)
𝑐
Using the equations (29), (30) and notation 𝐹𝑖 = 𝐸𝑖 − i𝐵 𝑖 , we will get [2, p. 386]:
1 1 1
𝜙00 = (𝐹 − i𝐹2 ) , 𝜙01 = 𝜙10 = − 𝐹3 , 𝜙11 = − (𝐹1 + i𝐹2 ) .
2 1 2 2
Due to the standard ISO 31-11 the coordinates (𝑥1 , 𝑥2 , 𝑥3 ) are denoted as (𝜌, 𝜙, 𝑧).
In order to avoid some collisions with charge density symbol 𝜌 the following notation
(𝑟, 𝜙, 𝑧) will be used.
The law of coordinate transition from Cartesian coordinates to cylindric ones:
⎧
⎨𝑥 = 𝑟 cos 𝜙,
⎪
𝑦 = 𝑟 sin 𝜙, (38)
⎪
𝑧 = 𝑧.
⎩
104 Bulletin of PFUR. Series Mathematics. Information Sciences. Physics. No 1, 2012. Pp. 96–106
𝑔𝑖𝑗 = 0 𝑟2
⎝ 0⎠ , 𝑔 𝑖𝑗 = 0
⎝ 1/𝑟2 0⎠ . (40)
0 0 1 0 0 1
√
𝑔 = 𝑟. (41)
Lame coefficients: ℎ1 ≡ ℎ𝑟 = 1, ℎ2 ≡ ℎ𝜙 = 𝑟, ℎ3 ≡ ℎ𝑧 = 1.
Maxwell’s equations in cylindric coordinates (𝑟, 𝜙, 𝑧):
1 1
[︁ ]︁
𝜕𝑗 𝐸𝑘 − 𝜕𝑘 𝐸𝑗 = − 𝜕𝑡 𝐵 𝑖 , 𝑖, 𝑗, 𝑘 = 1, 3,
𝑟 𝑐
1 1 4𝜋
[︁ ]︁
𝜕 𝐻 − 𝜕𝑘 𝐻𝑗 = − 𝜕𝑡 𝐷𝑖 + 𝑗 𝑖 , 𝑖, 𝑗, 𝑘 = 1, 3,
𝑟 𝑗 𝑘 𝑐 𝑐 (42)
1 (︀ 𝑖 )︀
𝜕 𝑟𝐷 = 4𝜋𝜌, 𝑖 = 1, 3,
𝑟 𝑖
1 (︀ 𝑖 )︀
𝜕𝑖 𝑟𝐵 = 0, 𝑖 = 1, 3.
𝑟
The final result after some rearrangements:
1 1
[𝜕 𝐸 − 𝜕𝑧 𝐸2 ] = − 𝜕𝑡 𝐵 1 ,
𝑟 𝜙 3 𝑐
1 1
[𝜕 𝐸 − 𝜕𝑟 𝐸3 ] = − 𝜕𝑡 𝐵 2 ,
𝑟 𝑧 1 𝑐
1 1
[𝜕 𝐸 − 𝜕𝜙 𝐸1 ] = − 𝜕𝑡 𝐵 3 ,
𝑟 𝑟 2 𝑐
1 1 4𝜋
[𝜕 𝐻 − 𝜕𝑧 𝐻2 ] = − 𝜕𝑡 𝐷1 + 𝑗 1 ,
𝑟 𝜙 3 𝑐 𝑐
1 1 2 4𝜋 2 (43)
[𝜕 𝐻 − 𝜕𝑟 𝐻3 ] = − 𝜕𝑡 𝐷 + 𝑗 ,
𝑟 𝑧 1 𝑐 𝑐
1 1 3 4𝜋 3
[𝜕 𝐻 − 𝜕𝜙 𝐻1 ] = − 𝜕𝑡 𝐷 + 𝑗 ,
𝑟 𝑟 2 𝑐 𝑐
1 1 𝜕𝐷1 𝜕𝐷2 𝜕𝐷3
𝐷 + + + = 4𝜋𝜌,
𝑟 𝜕𝑟 𝜕𝜙 𝜕𝑧
1 1 𝜕𝐵 1 𝜕𝐵 2 𝜕𝐵 3
𝐵 + + + = 0.
𝑟 𝜕𝑟 𝜕𝜙 𝜕𝑧
6. Conclusion
The main results of the article are:
1. It is shown that the usage of tensorial formalism instead of vectorial one for
Maxwell’s equations may simplify mathematical expressions (particularly in non-
Cartesian coordinate systems).
2. The connection between tensorial and vectorial formalisms is shown.
106 Bulletin of PFUR. Series Mathematics. Information Sciences. Physics. No 1, 2012. Pp. 96–106
References
1. Kulyabov D. S., Nemchaninova N. A. Maxwell’s Equations in Curvilinear Coor-
dinates (in russian) // Bulletin of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series
”Mathematics. Information Sciences. Physics”. — 2011. — No 2. — Pp. 172–179.
2. Penrose R., Rindler W. Spinors and Space-Time. Two-Spinor Calculus and Rela-
tivistic Fields. — Camgridge University Press, 1987. — Vol. 1, 472 p.
3. Морс Ф. М., Фешбах Г. Методы теоретической физики. — М.: Издательство
иностранной литературы, 1960. [Mors F. M., Feshbakh G. Metodih teoreticheskoyj
fiziki. — M.: Izdateljstvo inostrannoyj literaturih, 1960. ]
4. Васильев А. Н. Классическая электродинамика. Краткий курс лекций. — С.-П.:
БХВ-Петербург, 2010. [Vasiljev A. N. Klassicheskaya ehlektrodinamika. Kratkiyj
kurs lekciyj. — S.-P.: BKhV-Peterburg, 2010. ]
5. Minkowski H. Die Grundlagen für die electromagnetischen Vorgönge in bewegten
Körpern // Math. Ann. — 1910. — No 68. — Pp. 472–525.
6. Терлецкий Я. П., Рыбаков Ю. П. Электродинамика: Учебное пособие для сту-
дентов физ. спец. университетов. — 2-е, перераб. издание. — М.: Высш. шк.,
1990. — 352 с. [Terleckii Ya. P., Rybakov Yu. P. Ehlektrodinamika: Uchebnoe
posobie dlya studentov fiz. spec. universitetov. — 2-e, pererab. izdanie. — M.:
Vihssh. shk., 1990. — 352 s. ]
7. Stratton J. A. Electromagnetic Theory. — MGH, 1941.
8. Silberstein L. Electromagnetische Grundgleichungen in bivectorieller Behandlung //
Annalen der Physik. — 1907. — Vol. 22. — Pp. 579–586.