Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Table4.1. continued
Depth(ft) N qu(lb/ft2) γ(lb/ft3)
35-40 13 4073.16 58.02
40-45 16 4468.92 57.44
45-55 17 6272.87 45.55
55-65 33 11754.55 58.65
65-80 29 7948.77 44.34
Where,
γ = density of soil
qu= the unconfined compression strength
N= standard penetration number
dγ = dr = 1 (Ø = 0)
Kp = tan2 (45 + Ø/2)
H 1 c1 + H 2 c 2 +⋯+ H n cn
n
∑ Hi
cavg = i=1
dγ = 1 (for all Ø)
Nη H η B η S η R
N60 = 60 (4.6)
Where,
(N1)60 = CNN60
CN = correction factor
= [1/ (σvo'/Pa)]0.5
N = penetration resistance
ηH = hammer efficiency (%) (0.45 for doughnut hammer)
ηB = correction for borehole diameter
= 0.75 (up to 4 m drill rod)
ηS = sample correction
= 0.8 (with liner: clay)
ηR = correction for rod length
= 1 (65-115 mm diameter)
σvo' = vertical effective stress in KN/m2 or lb/ft2
Pa = 100 KN/m2 or 2000 lb/ft2
By CQHP format, qa from SPT is needed to convert from net to gross pressure
as follows:
Dγ
qa(gross) = qa(net) + SF
(4.7)
4.3 Design of Pile Foundation and Pile Cap for Case (1)
The design of pile, pile cap and settlement of group piles and single piles are
calculated and then other three cases are also calculated. The material properties, f c’ is
3000psi and fy is 40000psi are also used.
L = Le
(Qu )ult = A p c u N c + p ∑ c a ΔL
L=0
Where,
π π
Ap = (Bb )2 = (1 .5 )2 = 1 .76 ft 2
4 4
2
c u( base) = 7948. 77 /2=3947 .385 lb/ft
D f 65
= = 43 .33> 4
Bb 1.5
Df
> 4 , Nc = 9
From Table 3.1, for Bb
The allowable bearing capacity of this pile group can be calculated by the
following two methods.
(a) Block failure of pile group , by using equation ( 2.13 )
(QuG)ult= cuNc( b̄ 2
) + 4 cu( b̄ ) Le
From Table (2.1) Df/B =Df/ ƀ =65/5.5=11.82> 4, Nc =9
From Table (2.2) Bb =1.5ft, Nc =9
Value cu and Le were obtained above,
55
Spirals shall consists of a continuous bar or wire not less than (3/8)’’ diameter
and the clear spacing between turns of the spiral must not exceed 3 in nor be less than
1 in. Therefore, (3/8)”ф spiral steel3” c/c is used throughout the length of pile as
shown in figure4.2.
9#5@ 4"c/c
9#5 longitudinal steel
3/8"pile
18" spiral @3"c/c @ 4" c/c
3" cover
65' 3/8"spiral@3"/3"c/c
3'' cover
18"
Assume d= 21.5 in
LAB = 7 ft x 6.5 ft
= 45.5 ft2
58
A 7′ B
18in-pile
a 4.5′
b
6.5′
Two-way area
c d
(10.75in around
column)
C D
= qu x [(LAB - (Lab)2]
=501.47 kips
Norminal punching shear strength, ΦVc= Φ4 √ fc ' bo d
For X- direction
LAB = 7 ft
59
y = [3.5 – (13/12)-(21.5/12)]=0.625 ft
One way shear, Vu2 = bearing capacity x one way shear area
= qu x LAC x y
= 68.29 kips
7′
A B
x
6.5′
d L
C D
For Y direction
LAC = 6.5 ft
y = [3.25-(13/12)-(21.5/12)]
= 0.375 ft
L = 3.25-(13/12)
= 2.17
One way shear, Vu2 =bearing capacity x one way shear area
= qu x LAB x y
= 16.81 x 7 x 0.375
60
= 44.13kips
7′
A B
L
6.5′
d
y
C D
Mu = ωuL2/2
For X-direction
Assume a=1.02 in
As = Mu / Φfy (d-a/2)
= 5.08 in2
Check
61
= 1.02 in (Satisfactory)
The controlling value of 8.39 in2 is larger than 5.08 in2 calculated for bending.
For Y-direction
Assume a = 0.81 in
As = Mu / Φfy (d-a/2)
= 4.38 in2
Check
= 4.38x40/(0.85 x 3 x7x12)
= 0.81 in (Satisfactory)
= 7.42in2 ≥ 9.03in2
Therefore,
62
The controlling value of 9.03 in2 is larger than the 5.08in2 calculated for
bending.
So, choose 11#8 bars with 8” c/c in pile cap for X-direction, furnish 8.64 in2 and 12#8
bars with 7” c/c in pile cap for Y-direction, furnish 9.43 in2.
All axial forces and bending moment that act at the bottom section of column
must be transferred to the footing at the bearing surface by compression in the
concrete and by reinforcement.
ΦPn = 0.7 x 0.85 x 3000 x26 x 26x √ 7 x 6.5 x 144 / 26 x 26 ≤ 0.7 x 0.85 x 3000 x 2 x 26
x 26
So, Design strength = 2413.32 kips > pile reaction = 764.64 kips (Satisfactory)
At&s =ρbh
For different concrete compressive strength, the required steel are used no.6
bars in column.
= 0.005 x 26 x 26
= 3.38 in2
= 10.95in ≥ 9in
Take =2.17 ft
Number of pile =2
(a) Plan
3"cover
4"pile head
(b) Section
= 181.05 kips
Qp =62.881 kips
Qp(all) =62.881/2.5
= 25.11 kips
Qf = 596.806 kips
Qf(all) = 596.806/2.5
= 238.84 kips
=25.11 + 238.84
= 263.96 kips
Cs = [0.93 + 0.16 √ Df / B ] Cp
= [0.93+0.16√ 65/1.5] 0.03
= 0.059
Substituting above values in the expression for St;
From equation 2.17,
Ss = ((17.22+0.5x163.81)65x12x103)/(1.77x144x3.12x106)) =0.097 in
From equation 2.18,
Sp = (0.03x17.22x144)/(1.5x12x35.73) = 0.116 in
From equation 2.19,
Sps = ((0.059x163.81x144)/(65x12x35.73)) =0.05 in
From equation 2.16,
St =0.097+0.1163+0.05 = 0.263 in
S
G = St √( b̄/ B )
67
=036
√(6.5/ 1.5 )
= 0.75 in
Unit weight of soil is taken from layer 2 of soil report data to calculate the
effective stress of soil. The water table is found below the ground surface at 4ft.
σ'(at length L)
=(53.03x10+71.76x15+49.3x5+51.78x5+58.02x5+57.44x5+45.55x10+
58.65x10+44.34x15)/1000
=4.397 kip/ft2
=2.20 ton/ft2
Moisture content,ω = 22.68%
PL = 24.69%
LL = 43.7%
Liquidity Index = (ω-PL)/(LL-PL)
= (22.68-24.69)/(43.7-24.69)
=-0.11
From figure 2.5, Ṕc = 20 ton/ft2
Over Consolidation Ratio (OCR), = Ṕc/ σ'
=20/2.20
= 9.10 >4
OCR is greater than 4, therefore the clay soil is highly overconsolidation. So,
the consolidation settlement due to loads on pile foundations would not occur. And
then other layers are also overconsolidation.
The calculated settlement of pile group is 0.75 in. This is less than the
allowable settlement of 1 in. Therefore the design pile diameter, length and group
arrangement is acceptable.
Where,
π π
Ap = (Bb )2 = (3 )2 = 7 . 065 ft 2
4 4
Df 65
= = 21. 67> 4
Bb 3
Df
> 4 , Nc = 9
From Table 2.1, for Bb
(a) Plan
(b)Section
Figure4.7. Pile Reinforcement (a) Plan (b) Section
Qp =195.36 kips
Qp(all) =195.36/2.5
= 78.144 kips
Qf = 1193.61 kips
Qf(all) = 1193.61/2.5
= 477.44 kips
=78.144 + 477.44
= 555.59 kips when the actual load on each pile is 345 kips
Cs = [0.93 + 0.16 x √ Df / B ] Cp
= [0.93+0.16√ 65/3] 0.03
= 0.050
The calculated settlement of single pile is 0.4448 in. This is less than the
allowable settlement of 2 in. Therefore, the designed pile diameter and length is
acceptable.
4.4 Design of Pile foundation and Pile Cap for Case (2)
The design of pile, pile cap and settlement of pile group is calculated by the
following;
Where,
π π
Ap = (Bb )2 = (1 .5 )2 = 1 .76 ft 2
4 4
2
c u( base) = 7948. 77 /2=3947 .385 lb/ft
D f 65
= = 43 .33> 4
Bb 1.5
74
Df
> 4 , Nc = 9
From Table 2.1, for Bb
3′
The allowable bearing capacity of this pile group can be calculated by the
following two methods.
(a)Block failure of pile group, by using equation (2.13)
(QuG)ult= cuNc( b̄ 2
) + 4 cu( b̄ ) Le
From Table (2.1) Df/B =Df/ ƀ =65/1.5=43.33> 4,Nc =9
From Table (2.2) Bb = 1.5ft, Nc =9
S=4.5′
S=4.5′
(a)Plan
4.5′
(b)Section A-A
Figuren4.9. Pile Group Arrangement for Pile Group (2)
77
The allowable bearing capacity of pile group can be calculated by the following
two methods.
(a) Block failure of pile group , by using equation ( 2.13 )
(QuG)ult= cuNc( b̄ 2
) + 4 cu( b̄ ) Le
From Table (2.1) Df/B =Df/ ƀ =65/1.5=43.33> 4, Nc =9
From Table (2.2) Bb = 1.5ft, Nc =6
Value cu and Le were obtained above,
(QuG)ult = 3947.385 x 6 x 5.52 + 4 x 3519.73 x 5.5 x 60
= 5362.49 kips
(QuG)all = (QuG)ult /SF=5362.49/2.5= 2145.0 kips
9#5@ 4"c/c
9#5 longitudinal steel
18"pile
3/8" spiral @3"c/c @ 4" c/c
3" cover
65' 3/8"spiral @ 3"c/c
3'' cover
18"
= 554.3-20.475
= 533.83 kips
Average load factor = factored load/unfactored load
=937/421
=2.23
Pile reaction for strength design, Ru =Re x average load factor
= 533.83 x 2.23
= 1188.13 kips
Ultimate bearing pressure for strength design, qu =Ru/ selected area
= 1188.13/ (7 x 6.5)
= 26.11 ksf
The two-way shear is shown in the lower left quadrant of section. Let us
assume that the necessary depth has been found by trial and error procedure and a
check with effective depth d=22.5in. The circular punching shear section is at a
distance d/2 from column face which is 11.25 in around the column. The first term is
four piles on the outside of punching shear section, with the diameter of pile being
18” and the length of pile that lies outside the critical section being 11.25 in as shown
in figure 4.11.
Assume d= 22.5 in
LAB = 7 ft x 6.5 ft
= 45.5 in2
Lab = 26” +22.5”
= 48.5 in
b0 = 4 (26” +22.5”)
= 194 in
7"
18"-pile A B
a b
d 4.5"
c
Two-way area
(11.25in around
C D
column)
= qu x [(LAB - (Lab)2]
=761.57 kips
Norminal punching shear strength, ΦVul= Φ4 √ fc ' bo d
= (0.85 x 4 x √ 3000x194
81
x22.5)/1000
One –way shear section is in the left area of section as shown in figure 4.12. In
this section, one pile is entirely in the critical section.
For X- direction
LAB = 7 ft
y = [3.5 – (13/12)-(22.5/12)]=0.51467ft
= qu x LAB x y
= 26.11x 7 x 0.5146
= 99.01 kips
26"x26
"
x
6.5′
d
L
C D
For Y direction
LAC = 6.5ft
y = [3.25-(13/12)-(22.5/12)]
= 0.29167ft
L = 3.25-(13/12)
= 2.17ft
7′
A B
L
26"x26"
6.5′
4.5"
d
y
C D
One way shear, Vu2 =bearing capacity x one way shear area
= qu x LAC x y
= 49.51 kips
22.5)/1000
The critical sections for flexure are indicated in the lower right quadrant.
Bending moment at the face of the column,
Mu = ωuL2/2
For X-direction
Assume a=1.53 in
As = Mu / Φfy (d-a/2)
= 7.62 in2
Check
= 1.53 in (Satisfactory)
The controlling value of 8.78 in2 is larger than 7.62 in2 calculated for bending.
For Y-direction
Assume a = 1.22 in
As = Mu / Φfy (d-a/2)
= 6.55 in2
Check
a = Asfy/(0.85 fc’b)
= 6.55x40/(0.85 x 3 x7x12 )
= 1.22in (Satisfactory)
= 7.76in2 ≥ 9.45in2
Therefore,
The controlling value of 9.45 in2 is larger than the 6.55in2 calculated for
bending.
So, choose 12#8 bars with 7” c/c in pile cap for X-direction, furnish 9.43 in 2 and 13#8
bars with 8” c/c in pile cap for Y-direction, furnish 10.218 in2.
All axial forces and bending moment that act at the bottom section of column
must be transferred to the footing at the bearing surface by compression in the
concrete and by reinforcement.
85
ΦPn = 0.7 x 0.85 x 3000 x26 x 26x √ (7 x 6.5 x 144 /26 x 26)≤ 0.7 x 0.85 x
3000 x 2 x 26 x 26
So, Design strength = 2413.32 kips > pile reaction = 1188.13 kips (Satisfactory)
For reinforcing yield strength fy = 40000psi, the temp:& shrinkage ratio, ρ= 0.002
At&s =ρbh
= 0.002 x 12 x 30
= 0.72 in2/ft
For different concrete compressive strength, the required steel is used no.6
bars in column.
= 0.005 x 26 x 26
= 3.38 in2
= 10.95in ≥ 9in
86
Take =2.17 ft
Number of pile =3
Edge distance = 6 in
(a)Plan
87
3" cover
4" pile head
(b)Section
(1)Semiempirial method
= 147.16 kips
Qp =62.8 kips
Qp(all) =62.8/2.5
= 25.11 kips
Qf = 597.11 kips
88
Qf(all) = 597.11/2.5
= 238.84 kips
=25.11 + 238.84
= 263.96 kips
Cs = [0.93 + 0.16 x √ Df / B ] Cp
= [0.93+0.16√ 65/1.5] 0.03
=0.059
Substituting above values in the expression for St;
From equation 2.17,
Ss = ((14.00+0.5x133.16)65x12x103)/(1.77x144x3.12x106)) =0.079 in
From equation 2.18,
Sp = (0.03x14.00x144)/(1.5x12x35.53) = 0.0946 in
From equation 2.19,
Sps = ((0.059x133.16x144)/(65x12x35.53)) =0.0408 in
From equation 2.16,
St =0.079+0.0946+0.0408 = 0.215 in
(2)Empirical method
By using Equation (2.21)
89
S
G = St √( b̄/ B )
= 0.32√ (5.5/1.5)
= 0.621 in
Unit weight of soil is taken from layer 2 of soil report data to calculate the
effective stress of soil. The water table is found below the ground surface at 4ft.
'(at length L)
σ
=(53.03x10+71.76x15+49.3x5+51.78x5+58.02x5+57.44x5+45.
55x10+58.65x10+44.34x15)/1000
=4.397 kip/ft2
=2.20 ton/ft2
Moisture content, ω = 22.68%
PL = 24.69%
LL = 43.7%
Liquidity Index = (ω-PL)/(LL-PL)
= (22.68-24.69)/(43.7-24.69)
=-0.11
From figure 2.5, Ṕc = 20ton/ft2
Over Consolidation Ratio (OCR), = Ṕc/ σ'
=20/2.20
90
= 9.10 >4
OCR is greater than 4, therefore the clay soil is highly overconsolidation. So,
the consolidation settlement due to loads on pile foundations would not occur. And
then other layers are also overconsolidation.
The calculated settlement of pile group is 0.621 in. This is less than the
allowable settlement of 1 in. Therefore the design pile diameter, length and group
arrangement is acceptable.
Where,
π π
Ap = (Bb )2 = (3 )2 = 7 . 065 ft 2
4 4
Df 65
= = 21. 67> 4
Bb 3
Df
> 4 , Nc = 9
From Table 3.1, for Bb
From Table 3.3, for straight-sided shafts drilled concrete pile installed dry or
by the slurry displacement method, if c u(avg) for silt-clay along pile shaft is
3519.73lb/ft2, then ca/cu(avg) = 0.6.The safety factor 2.5 is used.
ca = 0.6 cu(avg) = 0.6 × 3519.73 = 2111.84 lb/ft2
From Table 2.4,
Le = L – (depth of seasonal variation)
= 65 – 5 = 60 ft
Qp = (7.065x3947.385x7)/1000 =195.36 kips
Qf = (9.42× 2111.84 × 60)/1000= 1193.61 kips
(Qu)ult = Qp+ Qf
= 1388.83 kips
(Qu )ult 1193. 61
= = 555 .53 kips
(Qu) all = FS 2.5
(Qu) all = 555.53kips is greater than 421 kips. Therefore, it is acceptable from a
bearing capacity point of view.
Spirals shall consists of a continuous bar or wire not less than (3/8)’’ diameter
and the clear spacing between turns of the spiral must not exceed 3 in nor be less than
1 in. Therefore, (3/8)”ф spiral steel3” c/c is used throughout the length of pile.
(a) Plan
(b)Section
(1)Semiempirial method
Qp =195.36 kips
Qp(all) =195.36/2.5
= 78.144 kips
Qf = 1193.61 kips
Qf(all) = 1193.61/2.5
94
= 477.44 kips
=78.144 + 477.44
= 555.59 kips when the actual load on each pile is 421 kips
Cs = [0.93 + 0.16 x √ Df / B ] Cp
= [0.93+0.16√ 65/3] 0.03
=0.050
Substituting above values in the expression for St;
From equation 2.17,
Ss = ((59.214+0.5x361.786)65x12x103)/(7.07x144x3.12x106)) =0.059in
From equation 2.18,
Sp = (0.03x59.214x144)/(3x12x27.65) = 0.257 in
From equation 2.19,
Sps = ((0.050x361.786x144)/(65x12x27.65)) =0.1207 in
From equation 2.16,
St =0.059+0.257+0.1207 = 0.4367 in
(2)Empirical method
By using Equation (2.21)
St = B/100 + (Qua L) / (Ap Ep)
Ep = Ec = 3.12x106 psi
95
4.5 Design of Pile Foundation and Pile Cap for Case (3)
The design of pile, pile cap and settlement of pile group is calculated by the
following;
Where,
π π
Ap = (Bb )2 = (1 .5 )2 = 1 .76 ft 2
4 4
96
2
c u( base) = 7948. 77 /2=3947 .385 lb/ft
Df 1.5¿
= 65 ¿ = 43.33> 4¿
Bb ¿
Df
> 4 , Nc = 9
From Table2.1, for Bb
S=5.5′
(a)Plan
(b)Section
Figure 4.16.Pile Group Arrangement
The allowable bearing capacity of this pile group can be calculated by the
following two methods.
(a)Block failure of pile group, by using equation (2.13)
(QuG)ult= cuNc( b̄ 2
) + 4 cu( b̄ ) Le
From Table (2.1) Df/B =Df/ ƀ =65/7=9.29> 4, Nc =9
From Table (2.2) Bb = 7ft, Nc =6
= 7073.68 kips
(QuG)all = (QuG)ult /SF=7073.68/2.5= 2829.5kips
3.5′
(QuG)ult= cuNc( b̄ 2
) + 4 cu( b̄ ) Le
From Table (2.1) Df/B =Df/ ƀ =65/7=9.29> 4,Nc =9
From Table (2.2) Bb = 7ft, Nc =6
Value cu and Le were obtained above,
(QuG)ult = 3947.385 x6 x 72 + 4 x 3519.73 x 7 x 60
100
= 7073.68 kips
(QuG)all = (QuG)ult /SF=7073.68/2.5= 2829.5 kips
Spirals shall consists of a continuous bar or wire not less than (3/8)’’ diameter
and the clear spacing between turns of the spiral must not exceed 3 in nor be less than
1 in. Therefore, (3/8)”ф spiral steel3” c/c is used throughout the length of pile as
shown in figure4.18.
9#5@ 4"c/c
9#5 longitudinal steel
18"фpile
3/8"spiral @3"c/c @ 4" c/c
3" cover
65' 3/8"spiral @ 3"c/c
3'' cover
18"
= 4 x 343
=1372.1 kip > 791.9 kips
Structural pile group capacity > allowable bearing capacity of pile
So, Structural pile group capacity is satisfactory.
The two-way shear is shown in the lower left quadrant of section. Let us
assume that the necessary depth has been found by trial and error procedure and a
check with effective depth d=33.5in. The circular punching shear section is at a
distance d/2 from column face which is 16.75 in around the column. The first term is
four piles on the outside of punching shear section, with the diameter of pile being
18” and the length of pile that lies outside the critical section being 16.75 in as shown
in figure 4.19.
Assume d= 33.5 in
LAB = 8 ft x 8 ft
= 64 in2
Lab = 26” +33.5”
= 59.5 in
b0 = 4 (26” +33.5”)
= 238 in
8′
A B
18′′ pile
5.5′
a b
8′
Two-way area c d
(16.75in around
column
C D
= qu x [(LAB - (Lab)2]
=1024.41kips
Nominal punching shear strength, ΦVul= Φ4 √ f c ' bo d
104
One –way shear section is in the left area of section as shown in figure4.20. In
this section, two piles are entirely in the critical section.
For X- direction
LAB = 8 ft
y = [4 – (13/12)-(33.5/12)]=0.125ft
L = 4- (13/12) =2.92 ft
= qu x LAB x y
= 25.99x 8 x 0.125
= 25.99 kips
8′
A B
x d
8′
L
C D
105
For Y direction
LAC = 8 ft
y = [4-(13/12)-(33.5/12)]
= 0.125 ft
L = 4-(13/12)
= 2.92 ft
8′
A B
8′
y
C D
One way shear, Vu2 =bearing capacity x one way shear area
= qu x LAC x y
= 25.99 x 8 x 0.125
= 25.99 kips
The critical sections for flexure are indicated in the lower right quadrant.
Bending moment at the face of the column,
Mu = ωuL2/2
For X-direction
Assume a=1.47 in
As = Mu / Φfy (d-a/2)
= 9.00 in2
Check
= 1.47 in (Satisfactory)
Therefore,
The controlling value of 16.08 in2 is larger than 9.00 in2 calculated for
bending.
107
For Y-direction
Assume a = 1.47in
As = Mu / Φfy (d-a/2)
= 9.00 in2
Check
= 1.47in (Satisfactory)
= 13.21in2 ≥ 16.08in2
Therefore,
As(min) = 16.08in2
The controlling value of 16.08 in2 is larger than the 9.00in2 calculated for
bending.
So, choose 21#8 bars with 5” c/c in pile cap for X-direction, furnish 16.506in2
and 21#8 bars with 5” c/c in pile cap for Y-direction, furnish 16.506 in2.
All axial forces and bending moment that act at the bottom section of column
must be transferred to the footing at the bearing surface by compression in the
concrete and by reinforcement.
ΦPn = 0.7 x 0.85 x 3000 x26 x 26x √ (8 x 8 x 144 /26 x 26)≤ 0.7 x 0.85
x 3000 x 2 x 26 x 26
So, Design strength = 2413.32 kips > pile reaction = 1663.38 kips (Satisfactory)
For reinforcing yield strength fy= 40000psi, the temp;& shrinkage ratio ρ=0.0002
At&s =ρbh
= 0.002 x 12 x 42
=1.008 in2/ft
For different concrete compressive strength, the required steel is used no.6
bars in column.
= 0.005 x 26 x 26
= 3.38 in2
= 10.95in ≥ 9in
Take =2.17 ft
Number of pile =4
Edge distance = 6 in
110
(a) Plan
(b) Section
Figure 4.22 Pile Cap (3)
settlement occurring gradually as the excess pore pressures generated by loads are
dissipated.
(1)Semiempirial method
= 158.15 kips
Qp =62.78 kips
Qp(all) =62.78/2.5
= 25.11 kips
Qf = 597.11 kips
Qf(all) = 597.11/2.5
= 238.84 kips
=25.11 + 238.84
= 263.96 kips
L = 65 ft
Ap = 1.77 ft2
Ep = 3.12x106 psi for concrete
From Table 2.6,Cp = 0.03 for pile in clay
qp = Qp/Abase = 62.8/ 1.77
= 35.53 kips/ ft2
From Equation 2.20,
Cs = [0.93 + 0.16 x √ Df / B ] Cp
= [0.93+0.16√ 65/1.5] 0.03
= 0.059
Substituting above values in the expression for St;
From equation 2.17
Ss = ((15.05+0.5x143.10)65x12x103)/(1.77x144x3.12x106)) =0.0849 in
S
G = St √( b̄/ B )
= 0.32√ (7/1.5)
= 0.724 in
113
Unit weight of soil is taken from layer 2 of soil report data to calculate the
effective stress of soil. The water table is found below the ground surface at 4ft.
σ'(at length L)
=(53.03x10+71.76x15+49.3x5+51.78x5+58.02x5+57.44x5+45.
55x10+58.65x10+44.34x15)/1000
=4.397 kip/ft2
=2.20 ton/ft2
Moisture content,ω = 22.68%
PL = 24.69%
LL = 43.7%
Liquidity Index = (ω-PL)/(LL-PL)
= (22.68-24.69)/(43.7-24.69)
=-0.11
From figure 2.5, Ṕc = 20Ton/ft2
Over Consolidation Ratio (OCR), = Ṕc/ σ'
=20/2.20
= 9.10 >4
OCR is greater than 4, therefore the clay soil is highly overconsolidation. So,
the consolidation settlement due to loads on pile foundations would not occur. And
then other layers are also overconsolidation.
The calculated settlement of pile group is 0.724 in. This is less than the
allowable settlement of 1 in. Therefore the design pile diameter, length and group
arrangement is acceptable.
Where,
π π
Ap = (Bb )2 = ( 4 )2 = 12. 57 ft 2
4 4
Df 65
= = 13. 45> 4
Bb 4
Df
> 4 , Nc = 9
From Table 3.1, for Bb
4′фpile
19#9longitudinal
19#9@7′′c/c steel@7′′c/c
4′
(a)Plan
(b) Section
Figure 4.23 Pile Reinforcement (a) Plan (b) Section
(1)Semiempirial method
Qp =297.71 kips
Qp(all) =297.71/2.5
= 119.084 kips
Qf = 1592.75 kips
Qf(all) = 1592.75/2.5
= 637.1 kips
=119.084 + 637.1
= 756.184 kips when the actual load on each pile is 599 kips
Cs = [0.93 + 0.16 x √ Df / B ] Cp
= [0.93+0.16√ 65/4 ] 0.03
=0.047
Substituting above values in the expression for St;
From equation 2.17
Ss = ((94.33+0.5x504669)65x12x103) / (12.57x144x3.12x106))
=0.04792in
(2)Empirical method
By using Equation (2.21)
St = B/100 + (Qua L) / (Ap Ep)
Ep = Ec = 3.12x106 psi
St = 48/100 + (599x65x12x103)/ (12.57x144x3.12x106)
= 0.5628 in
The higher of the above two values estimated by the semiempirical and
empirical method is 0.5908 in.
The calculated settlement of single pile is 0.5908 in. This is less than the
allowable settlement of 2 in. Therefore, the designed pile diameter and length is
acceptable.
119
4.6. Design of Pile Foundation and Pile Cap for Case (4)
The design of pile, pile cap and settlement of pile group is calculated by the
following;
Where,
π π
Ap = (Bb )2 = (1 .5 )2 = 1 .76 ft 2
4 4
2
c u( base) = 7948. 77 /2=3947 .385 lb/ft
D f 65
= = 43 .33> 4
Bb 1.5
Df
> 4 , Nc = 9
From Table 3.1, for Bb
(a)Plan
(c) Section
Figure4.24 Pile Group Arrangement (4-piles)
The allowable bearing capacity of this pile group can be calculated by the
following two methods.
(a)Block failure of pile group, by using equation (2.13)
(QuG)ult= cuNc( b̄ 2
) + 4 cu( b̄ ) Le
From Table (2.1) Df/B =Df/ ƀ =65/8=8.1> 4 ,Nc =9
From Table (2.2) Bb = 8ft, Nc =6
Value cu and Le were obtained above,
(QuG)ult = 3947.385 x 6 x 82 + 4 x 3519.73 x 8 x 60
= 8273.68 kips
(QuG)all = (QuG)ult /SF=8273.68/2.5= 3309.5kips
(a)Plan
(b)Section
Figure2.25 Pile Group Arrangement for Pile Group (4)
(QuG)ult= cuNc( b̄ 2
) + 4 cu( b̄ ) Le
From Table (2.1) Df/B =Df/ ƀ =65/1.5=8.1 > 4,Nc =9
From Table (2.2) Bb = 8ft, Nc =6
9#5@ 4"c/c
9#5 longitudinal steel
3/8"pile
18" spiral @3"c/c @ 4" c/c
3" cover
65' 3/8"spiral @ 3"c/c
3'' cover
18"
four piles on the outside of punching shear section, with the diameter of pile being
18” and the length of pile that lies outside the critical section being 19.75in as shown
in figure 4.27.
Assume d= 39.5 in
LAB = 9 ft x 13.4 ft
= 120.6 in2
Lab = 26” +39.5”
= 65.5 in
b0 = 4 (26” +39.5”)
= 262 in
18"pile
Two-way area
(19.75in around
column
= qu x [(LAB - (Lab)2]
=1462.62kips
Norminal punching shear strength, ΦVul= Φ4 √ fc ' bo d
= (0.85 x 4 x √ 3000
x262x39.5)/1000
For X- direction
LAD = 13.4 ft
y = [4.5 – (13/12)-(39.5/12)]=0.125ft
= qu x LAD x y
= 26.98 kips
39.5)/1000
x
L
For Y direction
LAC = 9 ft
y = [6.7-(13/12)-(39.5/12)]
= 2.325 ft
L = 6.7-(13/12)
= 5.62 ft
One way shear, Vu2 =bearing capacity x one way shear area
= qu x LAC x y
= 508.81 kips
x39.5)/1000
The critical sections for flexure are indicated in the lower right quadrant.
Mu = ωuL2/2
For X-direction
Assume a = 2.91in
As = Mu / Φfy (d-a/2)
= 29.83in2
Check
= 2.91in (Satisfactory)
39.5)/40000
= 26.09in2 ≥ 31.76in2
Therefore,
As(min) = 31.76in2
The controlling value of 31.76 in2 is larger than the 29.83in2 calculated for
bending.
For Y-direction
Assume a=1.05 in
As = Mu / Φfy (d-a/2)
= 7.24 in2
Check
= 1.05 in (Satisfactory)
The controlling value of 21.33 in2 is larger than 7.24in2 calculated for bending.
So, choose and 41#8 bars with 3” c/c in pile cap for X-direction, furnish
32.226 in2and 28#8 bars with 6” c/c in pile cap for Y-direction, furnish 22.008in2
All axial forces and bending moment that act the bottom section of column
must be transferred to the bearing surface by compression in the concrete and by
reinforcement.
ΦPn= 0.7 x 0.85 x 3000 x26 x 26x √ (9 x 13.4 x 144 /26 x 26)≤ 0.7 x0.85 x3000x2x 26
x 26
So, Design strength = 2413.32 kips > pile reaction = 1663.38 kips (Satisfactory)
For reinforcing yield strength fy = 40000psi, the temp:& shrinkage ratio, ρ= 0.002
At&s =ρbh
132
= 0.002 x 12 x 48
= 1.152 in2/ft
For different concrete compressive strength, the required steel area are used
no.6 bars in column.
= 0.005 x 26 x 26
= 3.38 in2
= 10.95in ≥ 9in
Take =2.17ft
Number of pile =5
Edge distance = 6 in
(a) Plan
134
(b) Section
Figure4.30.Pile Cap (4) Reinforcement
St = Ss + Sp + Sps
St =(Qpa +αs Qfa) L / (Ap Ep)+ CpQpa / (B qp)+ CsQfa / (Dfqp)
= 181.67 kips
Qp =62.78 kips
Qp(all) =62.78/2.5
= 25.11 kips
Qf = 597.11 kips
Qf(all) = 597.11/2.5
= 238.84 kips
=25.11 + 238.84
Cs = [0.93 + 0.16 x √ Df / B ] Cp
= [0.93+0.16√ 65/1.5] 0.03
= 0.059
Substituting above values in the expression for St;
From equation 2.17
Ss = ((17.28+0.5x164.39)65x12x103)/(1.77x144x3.12x106)) =0.0976 in
From equation 2.18
Sp = (0.03x17.28x144)/(1.5x12x35.53) = 0.1167 in
136
(2)Empirical method
By using Equation (2.21)
St = B/100 + (Qua L) / (Ap Ep)
Ep = Ec = 3.12x106 psi
St = 18/100 + (181.67x65x12x103)/(1.77x144x3.12x106)
= 0.36 in
The higher of the above two methods estimated by the semiempirical and
empirical method is 0.36 in.
Settlement of pile group can be calculated by the equation (2.22)
S
G = St √( b̄/ B )
= 0.36√ (8/1.5)
= 0.828 in
Unit weight of soil is taken from layer 2 of soil report data to calculate the
effective stress of soil. The water table is found below the ground surface at 4ft.
σ'(at length L)
=(53.03x10+71.76x15+49.3x5+51.78x5+58.02x5+57.44x5+45.
55x10+58.65x10+44.34x15)/1000
=4.397 kip/ft2
=2.20 ton/ft2
Moisture content, ω = 22.68%
PL = 24.69%
LL = 43.7%
137
Where,
π π
Ap = (Bb )2 = (5 )2 = 19 .63 ft 2
4 4
D f 65
= = 13> 4
Bb 5
138
Df
> 4 , Nc = 9
From Table 3.1, for Bb
bars)
= 169.56/29
= 5.85 in say 6 in
Use 29 # 9 longitudinal bars with 6” c/c spacing in piles.
Spirals shall consists of a continuous bar or wire not less than (3/8)’’ diameter
and the clear spacing between turns of the spiral must not exceed 3 in nor be less than
1 in. Therefore, (3/8)”ф spiral steel 3” c/c is used throughout the length of pile as
shown in figure 4.31.
(a)Plan
(b)Section
Figure 4.31 Pile Reinforcement (a) Plan (b) Section
140
The allowable stress of steel and concrete is taken as 4% of the yield strength
(a)Semiempirial method
Qp =464.92 kips
Qp(all) =464.92/2.5
= 185.97kips
Qf = 1990.37 kips
Qf(all) = 1990.37/2.5
= 796.148 kips
=185.97 + 796.148
Cs = [0.93 + 0.16 x √ Df / B ] Cp
= [0.93+0.16√ 65/5] 0.03
= 0.045
Substituting above values in the expression for St;
From equation 2.17
Ss = ((158.27+0.5x677.73)65x12x103)/ (19.625x144x3.12x106))
=0.04398in
From equation 2.18
Sp = (0.03x158.27x144)/ (3x12x23.685)
= 0.4811 in
From equation 2.19
Sps = ((0.050x677.73x144)/ (65x12x23.685))
=0.2377 in
From equation 2.16
St =0.04398+0.4811+0.2377
= 0.76283 in
(b)Empirical method
By using Equation (2.21)
St = B/100 + (Qua L) / (Ap Ep)
142
Ep = Ec = 3.12x106 psi
St = 60/100 + (836x65x12x103)/(19.625x144x3.12x106)
= 0.67396 in
The higher of the above two values estimated by the semiempirical and
empirical method is 0.76283 in.
The calculated settlement of single pile is 0.76283 in. This is less than the
allowable settlement of 2 in. Therefore, the designed pile diameter and length is
acceptable.
Table4.7 Comparison the Required Concrete Volume and Steel Reinforcement for
Group Piles and Single Piles
Typ
Group Single
145
e
Concrete(ft3) Steel(lb) Concrete(ft3) Steel(lb)