Portfolio Assessment of Abdaal Zahid
Criterion
1. Identification of a need or
opportunity with a brief analysis
leading to a design
brief
2. Research into the design
brief resulting in a
specification
3. Generation and exploration of
design ideas
4. Development of proposed
solution
5. Planning for production
6. Product realization
7. Testing and evaluation
Comments of Examiner Mark
 Detailed analysis of problem and need clearly identified.
 Descriptive design brief and reference to the user requirement is detailed.
4 out of 5
 Good use of task analysis to explore different possibilities.
 Specific constraints clearly set up.
 Conclusive information gathered from research.
 The mood board, product analysis and questionnaire are linked with the client profile 8 out of 10
 Detailed specification that is linked well with research.
 A good range of ideas showing different possibilities using good drawing technique.
 Comparative analysis of ideas carried out
17 out of 20
 Use of annotations in developed ideas.
 Objective evaluation of ideas against specifications.
 Good development of proposed solution, with appropriate design modifications and reasoned
decision-making on materials. 10 out of 15
 Clear CAD model made to develop a solution, but not justified with prototype.
 Dimensioned working drawings produced.
 Clear and detailed sequence of manufacturing process proposed, using cutting list, time plan and 9 out of 10
flowchart.
 Completed to a good standard, fulfils the specification developed earlier, and functions well.
27 out of 30
 Detailed Photographic record of whole manufacturing process.
 Objective testing evaluation carried out in the actual environment.
 Product evaluated against specification and by the client. 7 out of 10
 Weaknesses and strengths are identified but the suggestions for the future could be added.
Total mark awarded 82 out of 100