Portfolio Assessment of Shahmeer Bhatti
Criterion
1. Identification of a need or
opportunity with a brief analysis
leading to a design
brief
2. Research into the design
brief resulting in a
specification
3. Generation and exploration of
design ideas
4. Development of proposed
solution
5. Planning for production
6. Product realization
7. Testing and evaluation
Comments of Examiner Mark
 Need of the design according to the target user clearly identified
 In depth analysis of design problem. Link with design clearly established. 4 out of 5
 Design brief is clear, showing the constraints very clearly
 Thorough research of design brief with the data collected.
 Specifications of the product are justified through a detailed research analysis. 9 out of 10
 The mood board, product analysis and questionnaire are linked with the client profile
 A wide range of ideas with appropriate solutions. Evaluation of ideas are detailed according to the
desired specifications
17 out of 20
 Comparison of the initials shows the understanding of the technical knowledge.
 Annotations are detailed and good but can be more presentable.
 Development of idea is reasonably good, through the use of wide range of different techniques,
small details are included through sketching which gives a good understanding.
12 out of 15
 Good use of CAD to develop a solution.
 Effective use of modelling to set up an effective planning for production.
 Detailed working designs are present with the detailed dimensions.
9 out of 10
 Step by step whole manufacturing process is displayed using cutting list, time plan and flowchart.
 The product is completed to a very good standard, with the accuracy and most importantly
according to the expected specifications and functions. 27 out of 30
 Step by step photographic record of whole manufacturing process
 Real time testing carried out as the client took the product to the actual locations.
 Evaluation done against all the specifications developed.
9 out of 10
 Identification of strengths and weaknesses of the product leading to clear conclusions with
proposals for future improvement.
Total mark awarded 87 out of 100