Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Impact on Soil
2. Impact on Air
3. Impact on Water
6. Traffic Diversion
7. Muck Disposal
The construction activity will generate muck. The muck will be transported up
to nearest proposed option. Muck generated from the project component is
required to be disposed in a planned manner so that it takes a least possible
space and is not hazardous to the environment. Being the good road condition in
Ahmedabad, the dust generation due to transportation of muck will be
insignificant.
8. Health risk at construction site
There have been big improvements over recent years in reducing the number
and rate of injuries to construction workers. Despite this, construction remains a
high-risk industry and accounts for a high percentage of fatal and major injuries.
Health risks include accidents due to improper construction practice and hazard
diseases due to lack of sanitation facilities (i.e., water supply and human waste
disposal).
9. Employment Opportunities
The number of vehicles plying on mixed lane would have been higher “without
BRTS project” scenario than “with BRTS project” scenario. This would have
lead to higher number of road accidents. To support this view, the experience of
the Naroda-Narol stretch is taken into consideration. This particular stretch,
because of the number of accidents it took place, was called “The Killer Road”.
If the statistics sourced from the Ahmedabad Traffic Department by CEPT are
to be believed, at least four people lost their lives in road accidents on the
Narol-Naroda stretch alone every month. It comes down to around 48 accidents
a year in the year 2006. When the BRTS was introduced toward the end of the
year 2010, it was observed that two people died every month on this route due
to road accident (i.e. 24 people died in that year due to road accident). Such
fatal accidents dropped by 50 percent in the year 2011 as only 12 people died
due to road accident on this route. The total number of accidents on this stretch
has come down from 183 in 2006 to 151 in 2010 (when BRTS was launched) to
147 in 2011.
Vehicle emissions namely; CO2, CO, SPM (PM2.5 & PM10), NOx, HC,
and other air toxins are damaging effects on both human health and
ecology. They impose both direct and indirect threat on the well being of
the human being right from reduced visibility to cancers and death in
some cases of acute exposure of pollutants especially carbon monoxide
(CO). These pollutants are believed to directly affect the respiratory and
cardiovascular systems. In particular, high levels of Sulphur dioxide and
Suspended Particulate Matter are associated with increased mortality,
morbidity and impaired pulmonary function.
Hence, there is a dire need to reduce the menace of vehicular air
pollution. Public transport services like BRTS ensure that it takes away a
number of passenger vehicles off the roads. This facilitates reduced
vehicle pollution due to lower number of vehicles.
Local air pollutants, such as carbon monoxide and particulate matter,
pose environmental and public health concerns. By forcing the retirement
of less- efficient, older transport vehicles, BRT systems can have a
positive impact on smog, local pollution, and the health of city residents.
Because local air pollutants primarily impact individual health, this
benefit is treated as a public health impact
Dedicated bus lanes separate BRT buses from mixed traffic, allowing them to
travel more quickly through a city. Pre-paid boarding and level platforms –
reminiscent of a metro station rather than the traditional bus stop - speed up
passenger boarding, while traffic signal management that prioritizes BRT buses
and high-frequency bus service minimizes waiting times.
4. Employment Opportunities
Operation and maintenance of BRT systems can create jobs. This may result in
a net increase in the number of employed people, or merely a shift of workers
from one job or sector to another. In many cases, BRT systems create new jobs
in the formal economy that replace informal jobs from the existing traditional
transport system.
5. Crime Impacts
7. System Sociability
Public transport systems can also provide one of the few places in a city where
all social groups are able to meet and interact. An affordable and high- quality
system can attract customers from low income, middle income and high income
sectors. This role as a common public good can be quite healthy in creating
understanding and easing tensions between social groups. The new system may
also mean that persons who previously had no travel options now can visit the
entire city.
For the purpose of maintenance of depots and the busses, the demand for water
would go up.
10. Benefit to Economy
Along with reducing air pollution, public transportation is also more fuel
efficient per passenger mile, which contributes to an overall decrease in the
amount of energy necessary for transportation. APTA states that public
transportation in the US is responsible for saving 4.2 billion gallons of gasoline
each year.
For those who don't, or can't, drive, public transportation allows them to get to
work, to school, to the grocery store or doctor's office, or just to visit friends,
without having to engage a friend or relative to do the driving.