1) Robert Sternberg proposed the triangular theory of love, which separates love into three components - intimacy, passion, and commitment.
2) Intimacy involves emotional closeness, passion involves physical attraction and desire, and commitment is the decision to maintain the relationship long-term.
3) Sternberg identified different types of love based on combinations of the three components, such as romantic love (passion and intimacy), companionate love (intimacy and commitment), and consummate love (all three components).
1) Robert Sternberg proposed the triangular theory of love, which separates love into three components - intimacy, passion, and commitment.
2) Intimacy involves emotional closeness, passion involves physical attraction and desire, and commitment is the decision to maintain the relationship long-term.
3) Sternberg identified different types of love based on combinations of the three components, such as romantic love (passion and intimacy), companionate love (intimacy and commitment), and consummate love (all three components).
1) Robert Sternberg proposed the triangular theory of love, which separates love into three components - intimacy, passion, and commitment.
2) Intimacy involves emotional closeness, passion involves physical attraction and desire, and commitment is the decision to maintain the relationship long-term.
3) Sternberg identified different types of love based on combinations of the three components, such as romantic love (passion and intimacy), companionate love (intimacy and commitment), and consummate love (all three components).
contact with immediate family members, PPT 1: TYPES OF RELATIONSHIPS especially with parents - We experience a large number of - Sibling relationships are often exceptional relationships in our lives for the sheer amount of shared - AFFILIATION: the basic need for the experiences company of others - Grandparents are quite close to their grandchildren because they have little Situational Factors in Affiliation disciplinary responsibility and can simply Fox (1980) enjoy the company of the young - People are particularly keen to be with others under pleasant conditions and Friendship under threatening ones - A voluntary and universal relationship with - We prefer to be alone under unpleasant people whom we like circumstances - There is considerable variation in the Kulik and Mahler (1989) degree of intimacy and stability of - Cancer patients preferred being with friendships people who had successfully recovered - Take different forms and serve different from such an operation purposes at various stages of life Norms and Rules that are important in Motives for Affiliation (Buunk, 1996) Friendship - Argyle and Henderson (1985) ● Social comparison 1. Friends freely help in times of need ○ Formulated by Leon Festinger 2. Friends trust and respect each other and ○ Compare feelings/reactions with share confidences while respecting each those in the same situation other’s privacy ● Anxiety reduction 3. Friends do not criticise each other in ○ Attempt to reduce anxiety public and will not tolerate others being ○ Turning to sympathetic people unpleasant with friends who are not there who might offer emotional to defend themselves support and reassurance ● Information seeking Romantic Relationships ○ People tend to seek reassurance - Earliest stages of a passionate relationship from those who are more involve quite spectacular and specific knowledgeable than themselves physiological, psychological, cognitive, and emotional aspects (Hatfield and Rapson, 1987) - Passionate love is extremely fragile and Personality Factors in Affiliation unenduring, in contrast to other types of - People who are high in need to affiliate love which may last a lifetime (Walster are concerned about establishing and and Walster, 1978) maintaining positive relationships with others and tend to watch people closely PPT 2: Robert Sternberg’s TRIANGLE OF LOVE in social interactions Robert Sternberg Family - American Psychologist - Providing a shared identity and a secure - Triangle of Love, Triarchic Theory of base Intelligence, Three-Process View - Most enduring of all relationships Triangular Theory of Love ● Romantic Love (P + I) - Separates love into three comprehensible ○ Based on both physical and components emotional attraction - Total love one is involved in depends on ○ The lovers feel mutual passion and the strength formed by the entirety of the accompanied by the feeling that three components they can bare their souls to one another COMPONENTS: ● Companionate Love (I +C) ● Intimacy ○ Exists in a long-term committed ○ The emotional component friendship or in marriage in which ○ Involves sharing, mutual physical attraction has waned understanding and emotional ○ Most romantic relationships that support last eventually turn into ○ Creates warmth in a relationship companionate love relationships ● Passion ● Fatuous Love (P + C) ○ The motivational component ○ Commitment made on the basis of ○ Involves physical attraction, sexual passion alone as typified by a desire and the feeling of being ‘in ‘whirlwind romance’ love’ ○ Intimacy has had no time to ● Commitment develop and passion soon fades ○ The cognitive component ● Consummate Love (All three) ○ Involves a short-term decision that ○ A complete love towards which you love someone and a many people strive, especially in longer-term commitment to romantic relationships maintain that love ○ Sought in the relationship with those that mean the most to a MANIFESTATIONS: person ● Liking (Intimacy) ● Nonlove (None) ○ The feeling involved in true and ○ The absence of the three deep friendships components ○ There is closeness and warmth but ○ Refers to casual interaction and no passion and long-term acquaintances commitment ● Infatuation (Passion) ○ Obsession with an idealized partner than a real person, typical of ‘love at first sight’ ○ Involves a high degree of physical and mental arousal and tend to last only if the relationship is not consummated ● Empty Love (Commitment) ○ Typical the kind of love in a long-term stagnant relationship in which people have lost mutual emotional involvement and due to habit, fear of change, or ‘for the sake of the children’ THE ACTION TRIANGLE ○ Based on fun and strategy with no - Most people feel and experience love but commitment and with a belief in unable to express them ‘playing the field’ ○ Usually short-lived and will Ways to put Intimacy eventually end as soon as - Communicating inner feelings boredom sets in - Promoting other’s well-being ● Possessive Love (Mania) - Sharing of each other’s possessions, time ○ An emotionally intense, jealous, and self obsessive love shown by an - Expressing empathy for the other anxious individual who lives in - Providing emotional and material support constant fear of rejection Ways to put Passion ● Pragmatic Love (Pragma) - Gazing ○ A logical love based on selecting a - Hugging partner who satisfies practical - Touching needs and is a match in terms of - Kissing age, religion, background and - Making love personality Ways to put Commitment ● Altruistic Love (Agape) - Pledging ○ An unconditional, caring, giving - Fidelity and forgiving type of love - Engagement ○ No expectation of reciprocity - Marriage ○ Love is self-sacrificing - Keeping the relationship strong despite hardships PPT 4: Gary Chapman’s LOVE LANGUAGES
PPT 3: John Alan Lee’s STYLES OF LOVING Gary Chapman - American pastor and a senior associate John Alan Lee pastor - Canadian writer, academic and political - Known for his concept of Five Love activist and sociologist Languages - Early advocate for LGBT rights in Canada - Academic research into sociological and Love Languages psychological aspects of love and ● Words of Affirmation sexuality ○ Affirmative, active and appreciative verbal communication Styles of Loving ○ Convey encouragement, kindness, ● Romantic Love (Eros) humility and forgiveness ○ An all-consuming emotional ○ Can be expressed through spoken experience, an immediate and written messages powerful physical attraction to ● Physical Touch someone ○ An essential biological need to ● Companionate Love (Storge) communicate emotional intimacy ○ A comfortable intimacy that grows to reduce tension and stress slowly and involves mutual sharing ○ Expression of love that adds and gradual self-disclosure feelings of connectedness and ● Game-Playing Love (Ludus) security ● Acts of Service ○ Doing things that the other person ● Secure Base enjoys ● Separation Distress ○ Require thought, planning, time, effort and energy ○ Actions are used to show and Key Propositions: receive love 1. When children are raised with confidence ● Quality Time that their primary caregiver will be ○ Expressing affection with available to them, they are less likely to undivided, undistracted attention experience fear than those who are raised ○ Personality types, togetherness, without such conviction quality conversation, quality 2. This confidence is forged during a critical activities and learning to talk period of development, during the years ● GIft Giving of infancy, childhood, and adolescence. ○ Physical things that a person can The expectations that are formed tend to give to another remain relatively unchanged for the rest ○ A fundamental expression of love of the person’s life that transcends cultural barriers 3. These expectations that are formed are ○ Thoughts count directly tied with experience. Children develop expectations that their caregivers PPT 5: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth’s will be responsive to their needs because, ATTACHMENT STYLES in their experience, their caregivers have been responsive in the past. ATTACHMENT - A special emotional relationship that Mary Ainsworth involves an exchange of comfort, care and - American-Canadian developmental pleasure psychologist - “Lasting psychological connectedness - Strange Situation Assessment between human beings” Strange Situation Assessment John Bowlby 1. Mother, baby and experimenter - British psychologist and psychoanalyst 2. Mother and baby alone - Believed that early childhood attachments 3. A stranger joins the mother and the infant played a critical role in later development 4. Mother leaves baby and stranger alone and mental functioning 5. Mother returns and stranger leaves - Known for his Attachment Theory 6. Mother leaves; infant left completely alone Bowlby’s Attachment Theory 7. Stranger returns - The attachment behavioral system is 8. Mother returns and stranger leaves described as an innate psychobiological system that motivates human beings of all Ainsworth’s Attachment Styles ages to seek proximity to significant 1. Secure Attachment figures in times of need as a means of 2. Insecure-Avoidant Attachment protecting oneself from threats and 3. Insecure-Ambivalent/Resistant alleviating distress Attachment 4. Disorganized (later identified; Main and Characteristics of Attachment Solomon, 1990) ● Proximity Maintenance ● Safe Haven Dimensions of Attachment Styles (Brennan et al., ○ Children often show a mix of 1998) behaviors including avoidance or 1. Attachment-related Anxiety resistance to their caregivers 2. Attachment-related Avoidance ○ As adults, they are afraid of being too close or too distant from Hazan and Shaver (1987, 1990) others; they are overwhelmed by - Argue that the kinds of attachment bonds their reactions and often we form in childhood influence the style experience emotional storms of loving we experience as an adult - Asked adults to select from three descriptions
Attachment Styles ● Secure Attachment ○ Children see their parents as a secure base from which they can venture out and independently explore the world ○ As adults, they tend to have trusting and lasting relationships, high self-esteem, enjoy intimate relationships, seek out social support and share feelings with PPT 6: COMPONENTS OF RELATIONSHIP other people ● Anxious-Preoccupied Attachment SELF-DISCLOSURE ○ When left alone, children - The revealing of private and personal displayed considerable distress information about yourself that you could but do not seem reassured or not, as far as you are concerned, be comforted by the return of the acquired otherwise parent - Gradual and mutual ○ As adults, they are wary of strangers, reluctant to become Social Penetration Theory - Altman and Taylor close to others, worry about their (1973) relationships and feel suspicion or - As relationships grow increasingly more distrust intimate, they penetrate more and more ● Dismissive-Avoidant Attachment deeply into the private, social and mental ○ These children often pull away life of the self from needing anything and - Changes that occur in the type of sometimes they develop into ‘little exchange as a relationship becomes more adults’ who take care of intimate themselves 1. Orientation Stage ○ As adults, their lives are not 2. Exploratory Affective Stage balanced; they are inward and 3. Affective Stage isolated and emotionally removed 4. Stable Exchange Stage from themselves and others ● Fearful-Avoidant Attachment RULES - Behavior that most people think or believe 1. Regulating rules - regulate behavior to should be performed, or should not be minimize potential sources of conflict that performed (Argyle and Henderson, 1985) may disrupt the relationship - Types of Rules 2. Reward rules - provide an exchange of 1. Rewardingness rules rewards that motivate the individual to 2. Intimacy rules stay in the relationship 3. Rules for coordination and avoiding difficulties 4. Rules of behavior with third parties POWER - Can be defined as the ability of a person Rules for friendship to make demands on another and to have - Volunteer help in times of need those demands met - Seek to repay debts, favours and - Based on the control of valuable compliments resources - Show emotional support Rules for a dating relationship Sources of Social Power - French and Raven - Show mutual trust (1959) - Be punctual 1. Coercive Power - Be faithful to one another 2. Reward Power - Touch the other person intentionally 3. Legitimate Power Rules for marriage 4. Referent Power - Create a harmonious home atmosphere 5. Expert Power - Give birthday cards and presents - Inform the partner about one’s personal In an intimate relationship, power depends on schedule several factors including: - Talk to partner about religion and politics ● Psychological Dependency Rules for in-laws ○ Principle of Least Interest (Waller - Don’t engage in sexual activity and Hill, 1951) - Invite each other to family celebrations ○ States that the person who is less - Remember birthdays interested in continuing the - Repay debts, favors or compliments relationship has greater power and Rules for subordinates at work therefore greater influence over - Don’t hesitate to question when orders are what happens unclear ● Personal Resources - Put forward and defend own ideas ○ The greater the resources, the - Be willing and cheerful greater the power - Be willing to take orders ● Social Norms Rules for two people who don’t get on with each ○ It is hardly surprising that most other marriages are not egalitarian and - Should strive to be fair in relations with this is particularly due to one another differences in male and female - Should not invite to dine in family roles in intimate relationships celebrations (Pepalau and Gordon, 1983) - Should not feel free to take up as much of the other’s time as one desires PPT7: DETERMINANTS OF INTERPERSONAL - Should not ignore the other person ATTRACTION
Functions of Rules NATURAL SELECTION - Theorized by evolutionary psychologists about their personal feelings toward this - Women prefer to mate with men who stranger would be good fathers and who would - Law of Attraction: states that there is a stay around to be good providers direct linear relationship between the - Men prefer to mate with women who level of attraction and the proportion of could bear healthy babies and who could similar attitudes feed their children - Most stable marriages are those between couples who are similar (Cattell and PROXIMITY/PROPINQUITY Nesselrode, 1967) - Festinger et al. (1950) observed Exceptions to the Similarity Rule: friendships that formed in a block of - If individuals have low self-esteem, so apartments for married students that they don’t like themselves very much, consisting of 17 separate buildings, each then neither do they like those whom they comprising 10 flats on two floors perceive as being similar to them - Same building, more friendships (Leonard, 1975) - Same floor, more friendships - In situations where there is a great deal of uncertainty and confusion, we may prefer - The functional distance, that is the to seek out people different from likelihood of people coming into contact, ourselves, perhaps in the hope that they is also very influential can provide us with new information and - Several other studies support the offer a different perspective importance of both the physical and - Proximity is more important than similarity. functional distances in friendship Newcomb (1961), in a variation of his formation original study, deliberately pitted similarity against proximity. - Segal (1974) monitored the friendship patterns of police cadets who were PHYSICAL ATTRACTION assigned to their rooms and to seats in - “Blessed are the good-looking for they classrooms according to alphabetical shall have fun” order of their surnames - Importance: 1. Aesthetic pleasure - Importance of Proximity 2. What is Beautiful is Good effect 1. Familiarity and exposure 3. Gaining of considerable prestige 2. Low costs 3. Expectation of continued RECIPROCAL LIKING interaction - The extent to which a person like another 4. Predictability - In general, we like people who like us and 5. Evolutionary sense dislike those who dislike us
SIMILARITY Qualifications and Exceptions to the Reciprocal - Byrne and his colleagues conducted Liking many laboratory in which participants - Male participants who were led to believe were requested to complete a that a group of women liked them only questionnaire concerning their personal reciprocated these feelings when the characteristics women were physically attractive (Sigall - They were then shown the questionnaire and Aronson, 1969) answers of another person and asked - If someone who likes us tells us things about ourselves which do not correspond to our self-concept, we will not return their liking (Berscheid and Walster, 1969)
- Importance: - Being liked bolsters our self-esteem, makes us feel valued and therefore offers positive reinforcement (is rewarding)
COMPLEMENTARITY - Winch (1958) argued to some people are attracted to each other because each complements the needs of the other - There is little evidence that it is actually true, despite its being investigated by many psychologists - The rule of similarity is far more likely to apply
COMPETENCE - On the whole, we prefer people who are socially skilled, intelligent and competent over those who are not - Importance: 1. Halo Effect: our overall impression of a person influences how we feel and think about his or her character 2. Rewarding to be with whatever their particular area of competence
MODULE: DEVELOPMENT AND DETERIORATION OF RELATIONSHIPS