Code - Aster: SSLL14 - Gantry Plan Articulated in Foot

Version
Code_Aster default
Titre : SSLL14 - Portique plan articulé en pied Date : 01/08/2011 Page : 1/22
Responsable : FLÉJOU Jean-Luc Clé : V3.01.014 Révision :
c83921daab33
SSLL14 - Gantry plan articulated in foot
Summary
This test relates to the study of a gantry made up of hurled beams, articulated in foot, in linear static analysis.
The gantry is modelled with linear elements SEG2 and subjected to four loadings (distributed or specific).
Warning : The translation process used on this website is a "Machine Translation". It may be imprecise and inaccurate in whole or in part
and is provided as a convenience.
Copyright 2020 EDF R&D - Licensed under the terms of the GNU FDL (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html)
Version
Code_Aster default
c83921daab33
1 Problem of reference
1.1 Geometry
Geometry of the gantry m :

• l=20
• h=8
• a=4
Quadratic moments of the beams m4  :

−4
• Sections AD , EB : I 1 =5.0 E
−4
• Sections DC , CE : I 1 =2.5 E
The gantry consists of symmetrical beams of sections, so that IY = IZ.

One takes account only of the energy of inflection, because the beams are very slim. This is why the
other characteristics of section of beam do not intervene.
1.2 Material properties

Isotropic linear elastic material: E=2.1 E11 Pa
1.3 Boundary conditions and loadings

Feet of posts A and B articulated.
Loadings
Nodal force in C : F y=– 2000 N = F 1
Nodal force in D : F x =– 10 000 N =F 2
Moment in D : Mx=– 100 000 N.m=M
Force distributed on the section DC : P z=– 3000 N /m
Version
Code_Aster default
c83921daab33
2 Reference solution
2.1 Method of calculating used for the reference solution
The method of calculating and the solution were determined by F. Voldoire (EDF R & D/AMA) and are
exposed in the appendix.
2.2 Results of reference

Horizontal reactions Fx and verticals Fy at the point A .
Bending moment Mz in C .
Displacements horizontal Dx and vertical Dy point C .
2.3 Uncertainty on the solution

Analytical solution.
Version
Code_Aster default
c83921daab33
3 Modeling A
3.1 Characteristics of modeling
• Modeling POU_D_E
• 10 elements section by section, is 40 elements SEG2
• Displacement in the plan: DZ =0 on all the grid
• Feet of posts A and B articulated: DX = DY =0
3.2 Sizes tested and results

3.2.1 Values tested
Loading Node Value tested Reference
Dx m 0.0110476
C Dy m – 0.012422374
p Mz  N.m 18672.994
Fx  N  5175.37
A
Fy  N  24233.24
Dx m 0.00000
C Dy m – 0.01497330
F1 Mz  N.m 41422.161
Fx  N  4881.487
A
Fy  N  10000.00
Dx m – 0.03000956
C Dy m – 0.00299466
F2 Mz  N.m 8284.432
Fx  N  5976.297
A
Fy  N  4000.00
Dx m 0.0273532
C Dy m – 0.001215646
C Mz  N.m 4916.724
Fx  N  4576.394
A
Fy  N  5000.00
Version
Code_Aster default
c83921daab33
4 Summary of the results

Results got with modeling POU_D_E are in very good agreement with the analytical solution and thus
validate the calculation of lattice of beams subjected to efforts specific or distributed.
Version
Code_Aster default
c83921daab33
5 Appendix
5.1 Presentation
One considers the gantry opposite, subjected to various loads.
One considers the gantry opposite,
subjected to various loads.
Hyperstaticity of degree 1.
Hyperstatic unknown factor: X:
moment out of C.
Top-load distributed p on C 1 C .
Two forces F 1 , F 2 and a couple in
C1 .
Hyperstaticity of degree 1.
Hyperstatic unknown factor: X
Loads applied:
• moment in C ,
• top-load distributed p on C 1 C 2 ,
• force F1 , F2 applied in C 1 ,
• couples  applied in C 1
2a
tan = =0.4⇒cos −1=  1.16=1.077033
l
l 1
tan  = =
2 ah 1.2
l a
b= ; sin =
2cos  b
5.2 Isostatic requests under real load distributed p on C 1 C

5.2.1 Isostatic reactions of supports
pl pl 2
H AH B=0 V AV B = lV B=
2cos  8cos
The part CB is articulated and charged only at its ends
 
H B ∧BC =0 ⇔ H =−V tan  
VB
B B
Version
Code_Aster default
c83921daab33
From where isostatic reactions

pl 3 pl − pl pl
H A= tan   ; V A= ; H B= tan   ; V B=
8cos  8cos  8cos 8cos 
Note:
l tan   bl
=
8 cos  8ah
5.2.2 Requests
Beam AC 1
−3 pl
N iso=
8cos 
pl
V iso = tan 
8cos
− pl
M iso= y.tan 
8cos
Beam C2 B
− pl
N iso=
8cos 
− pl
V iso = tan 
8cos
− pl
M iso= y.tan 
8cos
Beam C1C
px
N iso =−H A cos −V A sin  sin 
cos
=−
pl
8 
tan 3 tan −8 tan 
x
l 
px
V iso = H A sin −V A cos  cos 
cos
=
pl
8 
tan tan −38
2
x
l 
px
M iso =− V A x− H A y
2cos
=
p
cos 2 
−x 2 3 lx ly tan 

8
−
8 
with M iso=0 in C
M iso=
− pl
8ah 
2 s2 
ah
b
−s 2a3hbh with s=
x
cos 
∈[0, b]
Version
Code_Aster default
c83921daab33
Beam CC 2
N iso = H B cos−V B sin
pl
=−  tan tan  
8
V iso = H B sin V B cos
pl
=−  tan tan −1 
8
M iso = H B y−V B l− x 
pl
=−  y.tan−l− x  
8cos 
with M iso=0 in C
5.2.3 Diagrams
 b=
l
2cos  
5.3 Requests under concentrated force F 1 (downwards)

5.3.1 Reactions of support
H AH B=0 ;
V AV B =F 1 ;
   
H A ∧AC =0= H B ∧BC ;
VA VC
From where:
1 1 −1 1
H A= F 1 tan   ; V A= F 1 ; H B = F 1 tan   ; V B= F 1
2 2 2 2
Version
Code_Aster default
c83921daab33
5.3.2 Requests
−1
N iso= F
2 1
1
Beam AC 1 : V iso = F 1 tan 
2
−1
M iso= F y tan 
2 1
−1
N iso= F
2 1
−1
Beam C 2 B : V iso = F tan 
2 1
−1
M iso= F y tan 
2 1
−1
N iso= F tan cos sin 
2 1
1
Beam C 1 C : V iso = F 1 tan sin −cos 
2
−1
M iso= F  y tan − x 
2 1
−1
N iso= F tan cos sin 
2 1
1
Beam CC 2 : V iso = F 1 tan sin −cos 
2
−1
M iso= F  y tan −l − x 
2 1
5.3.3 Diagrams ( F 1 downwards)
Version
Code_Aster default
c83921daab33
5.4 Requests under the concentrated force F 2 (towards the left)

H A H B = F 2 ;
V AV B =0 ;
lV B hF 2=0 ;
 
H B ans BC=0
VB
From where:
h h h h
H A=F 1 1− tan  ; V A= F 2 ; H B=F 1 tan   ; V B =−F2 ;
l l l l
Note:
h h h 2ah
tan = 1− tan =
l 2 ah l 2ah
2 2
tan sin  – cos=
−hl l – 4 a ah
, tan  cos – sin =
2b ah 4b ah
5.4.2 Requests
h
N iso =−F 2
l
h
Beam AC 1 : V iso =F 2 1− tan 
l
h
M iso=−F 2 y 1− tan 
l
h
N iso =F 2
l
h
Beam C 2 B : V iso =F 2 tan  
l
h
M iso=−F 2 y y tan 
l
h h
N iso= F 2 1− tancos  – cos 
l l
h h
Beam C 1 C : V iso =F 2 1 – tan – cos
l l
h h
M iso= F 2  x−1 – tan y
l l
h
N iso= F 2 tan cossin 
l
h
Beam C C 2 : V iso =F 2  tan  sin−cos 
l
h
M iso= F 2  y tan −l − x
l
Version
Code_Aster default
c83921daab33
5.4.3 Diagrams
5.5 Requests under the concentrated couple  (positive)

H A H B =0 ;
V AV B =0 ;
lV B =0 ;
 
H B ∧BC =0 ;
VB
   −
From where: H A=− tan , V A= , H B = tan , V A=
l l l l
Note:
tan  1
=
l 2 ah
Version
Code_Aster default
c83921daab33
5.5.2 Requests
−
N iso =
l
− tan  
Beam AC 1 : V iso =
l
 y tan 
M iso=
l
−
N iso =
l
 tan 
Beam C2 B : V iso =
l
 y tan 
M iso=
l

N iso =  tan   cos – sin 
l
−
Beam C 1C : N iso = tan  sin cos 
l

N iso =  x  y tan  – l 
l

N iso =  tan  cossin 
l

Beam C C2 : N iso =  tan  sin −cos 
l

N iso =  y tan   – l−x 
l
5.5.3 Diagrams (  positive)
Version
Code_Aster default
c83921daab33
5.6 Requests under the moment X hyperstatic

H AH B=0 ;
V AV B =0 ;
lV B=0 ;
H B ah – X =0 ;
−X X
From where reactions: H a = , V A=0 , H B = , V B=0
ah ah
5.6.2 Requests
N X =0
−X
V X=
Beam AC 1 : ah
X
M X= y
ah
N X =0
X
V X=
Beam C 2 B : ah
X
M X= y
ah
X
N X= cos 
ah
X
Beam C 1 C : V X= sin 
ah
X X
M X= y= h x tan
ah ah
X
N X= cos
ah
X
Beam CC 2 : V X= sin 
ah
X
M X= y
ah
Version
Code_Aster default
c83921daab33
5.6.3 Diagrams
5.7 Requests under specific dummy loads in C

In order to calculate displacement in C , using the Principle of Virtual work ( cf. the paragraph [§ 8] ),
it is necessary to establish the diagrams of requests under the action of two “fictitious” forces f and g
applied in C .
H AH B=− f ;
V AV B =−g ;
 
H A ∧AC =0= H B ∧BC
VA VB  
From where:
−1 −1
H A=  f g tan  , V A=  g f cot 
2 2
−1 −1
H B=  f −g tan  , V B=  g− f cot 
2 2
Version
Code_Aster default
c83921daab33
5.7.2 Requests
1
n=  g f cot 
2
−1
Beam AC 1 : v=  f  g tan 
2
1
m=  f g tan 
2
1
n=  g− f cot 
2
−1
Beam C 2 B : v =  f −g tan 
2
−1
m=  f −g tan  y
2
1 1
n=  f  g tan cos   g  f cot sin 
2 2
−1 1
Beam C 1 C : v=  f g tan  sin   g f cot  cos 
2 2
1 1
m=  f  g tan  y−  g  f cot  x
2 2
−1 1
n=  f −g tan   cos   g − f cot   sin
2 2
−1 1
Beam CC 2 : v=  f − g tan sin −  g − f cot cos 
2 2
−1 1
m=  f −g tan  y−  g− f cot l − x 
2 2
5.7.3 Diagrams
Here diagrams of requests under the action of the two “fictitious” forces f and g . One considers here:
f ≥0 , g≥ fcot   .
5.8 Determination of the moment X hyperstatic

One places oneself in elasticity; one considers only the energy of inflection, the beams being slim. The
natural state is supposed to be virgin (not prestressings nor of displacement of support).
The complementary potential is then:
 M iso M 1 X 2 M iso M 1 X 2
F∗ X =∫ poteaux ∫charpentes
EI 1 EI 2
Version
Code_Aster default
c83921daab33
It is stationary with balance, from where:
[∫ ]
2 2
M1 M M M M M
.X= ∫charp 1 . X =−∫pot 1 iso −∫charp 1 iso =S
pot EI 1 EI 2 EI 1 Ei 2
The coefficient of flexibility  is the sum of:

2 2
M
∫pot EI 1
1
=
2h h
 
3EI1 ah
M 21 2b h 2 1 a 2 ah
∫charp = [
EI 2 EI 2 ah
 
3 ah

ah2
]
that is to say:
3
2 h b3h 2a 23ah 
E .= 2
[  ]
ah 3I1 3I 2
Digital application:
In the example considered:
l
I 1 =2I 2=5.0 E−4 m4 , h=2a=8 m , l=20 m , b=  1.16
2
2 h2 19b
= h 
From where: E  ah1 
2I
3 2
3
2353.45347 m
One studies one after the other the various loadings to calculate the second members S.
5.8.1 Distributed load p on C 1 C

The second member S had with f is:
M 1 M iso 3h h pblh 2 ph3 bl
−∫pot =   =
EI 1 3EI1 ah 8 ah E ah2 I 1 24
M 1 M iso pb2 hl 1 h a a 2 phb 2l 3ha
−∫CC =   =
EI 2
2 8ah EI 2 2 ah 6 ah E ah2 I 2 48
M M
−∫C C 1 iso =
1 EI 2
1 pl
EI 2 8 ah 2 ∫0
b
2s 2
ah
2
b [
– s 2a3hbh hs ds
a
b ][ ]
1 plb 2 2
=  h 2aha 
E ah I 2 2
48
From where:
S=
2
E ah2 96 I 1

I2[
plb 4h 3 hb3ha b h2 – 2ah−a 2

I2 ]
I 1 =2 I 2 ; h=2a ; p=3000 N.m 1 (downwards)
plbh 2
S=
2
2
E ah I 1 96
13
4h b
2 [ 4
]
43946 021.89 N.m
Version
Code_Aster default
c83921daab33
From where:
• moment in C :
X =18672 994 N.m
• A :
reaction in
pbl
bl X 8− X
H A= p − =
8ah ah ah , H A=5175.37 N
3pb
V A= −0
4 , V A=24 233.24 N
5.8.2 Concentrated loading F 1 in C

The second member is obtained using:
M 1 M iso 2h h F 1 lh 2 F 1 lh 3
−∫ pot =   =
EI 1 3EI1 ah 4ah E ah2 I 1 12
M M 2b F 1 lh 1 h 1 a 2 F 1 blh3ha 
−∫charp 1 iso =     =
EI 2 EI 2 4 ah 2 ah 6 ah E ah2 I 2 24
From where:
S=
2
2
E  ah 24 [
F 1 lh 2h 2 b3ha
I1

I2 ]
I 1 =2 I 2 ; h=2a ; F 1=20 000 N (downwards)
2
2 F 1 lh
S= [ 2h7 b ]
E  ah I 1 
2
24
4
97 485 127.76 N.m
From where:
• moment in C :
X =41 422.161 N.m
• reaction in A :
F 1l
1 l X 4− X
H A= F 1 − =
4 ah ah ah , H A=4881.4866 N
1
V A= F 1 −0
2 , V A=10 000.0 N
5.8.3 Concentrated loading F 2 in C 1

M 1 M iso h h F 2 h 2ah 2 F 2 h3 2a h
−∫AC =   = 2
1 EI 1 3EI 1 ah 2ah E ah I 1 12
2 3
M 1 M iso h h −F 2 h  2 F 2 h 2ah 
−∫C =   =
2 B EI 1 3EI 1 ah 2 ah E ah2I 1
12
Version
Code_Aster default
c83921daab33
M 1 M iso b F 2 h 2ah 1 h F 2 bh3h 27ah 2a 2 

−∫C C
1EI 2
=
EI 2 2 ah

1 a
 
2 ah 6 ah
 = [ 2
2
E ah I 2 ]
24
2 2
M 1 M iso b −F 2 h 1 h −F 2 bh 3ha 
−∫CC
EI 22
=  [
1 a
 
EI 2 2 ah 2 ah 6 ah
=
2
2
E  ah I 2 24 ]
[
F 2 ha 2h b 3ha 
]
2
2
S= 2

E  ah 12 I1 I2
I 1 =2 I 2 ; h=2a ; F 2=10 000 N (towards the left)
2
2 F2h a
S= [ 2h7 b ]
E  ah I 1 
2
12
4
19 497025.55 N.m
From where:
• moment in C :
X =8 284.4321 N.m
• reaction in A :
h
F 2 a −X
2a h X 2
H A=F 2 − =
2 ah ah ah , H A=5976.297 N
F h
V A= 2
l , V A=4 000.0 N
5.8.4 Specific couple  in C 1

M 1 M iso −2h h h 2 − h3
−∫pot =   =
EI 1 3EI1 ah 2 ah E ah2 I 1 6
b   h2a b 1 h   h2a3ha b
−∫C C = 
EI 2 2 ah EI 2 2 ah 6 ah
1
1 a
  [  =
2
2
E  ah I 2 24 ]
M 1 M iso b − h 1 h
−∫CC
EI 2 2
= 
1 a
 
EI 2 2 ah 2 ah 6 ah [ =
2
2
E  ah I 2
− hb3ha
24 ]
From where:
S=
2
2
E  ah 12 I 1 [
− 2h 3 ab3ha

I2 ]
I 1 =2 I 2 ; h=2a ; =−100 000 N.m (direction hands clock)
2 − 3
S= [ h −ab 3ha ]
E  ah2 I 1 6
4
11 571281.93 N.m
From where:
• moment in C :
X =4 916.7243 N.m
Version
Code_Aster default
c83921daab33
• reaction in A :
−
−X
− X 2
H A= − =
2 ah ah ah , H A=4576.394 N

V A=
l , V A=5 000.0 N
5.8.5 Summary
CA Moment in C Reactions in A N 
 N.m HA VA
p on C 1 C 18672.994 5175.37 24233.240
F 1 in C 41422.161 4881.487 10000.000
F 2 in C 1 8284.432 5976.297 4000.000
 in C 1 4916.724 4576.394 5000.000
TOTAL 73296.311 22033.31 43233.24
Notice
Recall: in the post AC 1 : normal effort = −V A , shearing action = H A .
5.9 Calculation of displacement in C

One considers also only the elastic energy of inflection (slim beams). By applying the Principle of
virtual Work to the structure subjected to the fictitious forces of the paragraph [§ 6] , working in sought
displacements, the numbers are calculated w and d depending linearly on f and g :
m M iso XM 1  m M iso  XM 1
f uc g v c =∫ pot ∫charp =w Xd , ∀  f , g 
EI 1 EI 2
5.9.1 Distributed load p on C 1 C

m M iso 2h ghl − pbhl 2 −gpbh3 l 2
∫pot EI = 3EI 4ah 8 ah = E ah2 I 96
1 1 1
m M iso 2 − plhb 2
∫C C EI = E ah2 I 384  2f ah glh−a 
1
2 2
M iso − pb 2 lh 2  gl−2f ah 
2
2
=
b
2
pbhl fh
− glh
∫CC EI 3EI 8ah 2 4 ah E  ah2 I =
2
2
 192
From where:
w=
2
E ah2 384 I1


− pbhl 4glh 2 glb3ha −efbah2
I2 
I 1 =2I 2 ; h=2a ; p=3000 N.m−1 (downwards)
2 5 9 − pbh 2 l
w=  gl  2h b− fbh
2
E ah I 1 2 2  192
3
−215 406.5922 N.m
Version
Code_Aster default
c83921daab33
5.9.2 Concentrated loading F 1 in C

m M iso 2h ghl −F 1 hl 2 −F 1 gh3 l 2
∫pot EI 1
= =
3EI 1 4 ah 4 ah E ah2 I 1 48
2 2
m M iso 2b ghl −F 1 hl 2 −F 1 gbh l
∫charp EI 2
= = 2
3EI 2 4 ah 4ah E  ah I 2 48
w does not depend on f for this loading):

From where (it is noted that
2 2
w=
2
E ah 2
−F 1 gh l
48
h b

I1 I 2  
I 1 =2I 2 , h=2a ,F 1=20 000 N (downwards)
2 2
2g −F 1 h l
w= 2 
h2b
E ah I 1 48
−3155100365.0 N.m5
5.9.3 Concentrated loading F 2 in C 1

m M iso F2h
∫pot EI 1
=
h
3EI1 2 ah [
−2ah 
fh ghl
2 4ah
h 
− fh
2

ghl
4 ah
 ]
2 −F 2 h3
= agl2f  ah2 
2
E ah I 1 24
m M iso 2 −F 2 bh 2 2
∫charp EI 2
= 2
E  ah I 2 24
 agl2f ah 
From where:
2
2 −F 2 h h b
w= 2
agl2f ah2   
E ah 24 I1 I2
I 1 =2I 2 , h=2a , F 2=10 000 N (towards the left)
2 −F 2 h3  h2b
w=  gl9gh
E ah2 I 1  48
4
−3151003.65 N.m
5.9.4 Specific couple  in C 1

m M iso
∫pot EI 1
=
h h fh
  [
3EI1 2 ah 2 4 ah
glh

− fh
2

glh
4ah
 ]
2  h3 lg
=
E ah2 I 1 24
Version
Code_Aster default
c83921daab33
m M iso
∫charp EI 2
=
b h
3EI 2 2 ah [
−2ah 
fh glh
2 4ah
h 
− fh
2

glh
4 ah
 ]
−2  bh
= 2
agl2f ah2 
E ah I 2 24
I 1 =2I 2 ; h=2a ; =−100 000 N.m
2
2 h
w=  gl h−b−9fhb
2
E ah I 1 24
−3151003.65 N.m4
m⋅M 1
5.9.5 Calculation of d =∫
EI
mM 1 2h glh h 2 glh
3
∫pot = =
EI 1 3EI1 4 ah ah E ah2 I 1 12
mM
2
2b 1 h
∫charp EI 1 = EI 
2 2 ah
[ 1 a
  
glh
=
2
2
6 ah 4ah E ah I 2 ]
glbh 3ha
24
d does not depend on f ):

From where (it is noted that
d=
2
E ah2 24 I 1


glh 2h 2 b 3ha 
I2 
I 1 =2 I 2 , h=2a
2 lh 2
d= g 
2h7b
E ah2 I 1 24 −4874.2564 N.m 4
5.9.6 Summary of displacements u c and v c

I 1 =5.0 E−4 m4
E=210 000 MPA
CA X X d wv
pressure on C 1 C 18672.994 91016960.3 – 184930109.4
F 1 in C 41422.161 201902233.4 – 315100365.0
F 2 in C 1 8284.432 40380445.6 – 63020073.0
 in C 1 4916.724 23965373.4 14775091.25
CA wh u c m v c m
pressure on C 1 C 83519999.94 0.0110476 – 0.012422374
F 1 in C 0.00 0.00 – 0.01497330
F 2 in C 1 – 226872262.8 – 0.03000956 – 0.00299466
 in C 1 206790328.5 0.0273532 – 0.001215646
Version
Code_Aster default
c83921daab33
Note:
2
d= g d , with: d =4 874.2564 m 4
E ah2 I 1
2
w=  g w v  f w h  to see higher
E ah2 I 1
2 2
u c= 2
wH ; v c= w v  X 
d
E ah I 1 E ah 2 I 1
2
2
=1.32275132 E−10 N −1 m−4
E ah I 1
Comparison Aster - analytical reference (R.)

Moment in Reaction Reaction Displacement Displacement
CA
C  N.m H A N  V A N  u c m v c m
R: 18672.994 5175.37 24233.24 0.0110476 – 0.012422374
P on C 1 C Aster : 18673.20 5175.36 24233.2 0.0110472 – 0.0124233
R: 41422.161 4881.487 10000.00 0.00000 – 0.01497330
F 1 in C
Aster : 41422.40 4881.47 10000.0 0.0000 – 0.0
R: 8284.432 5976.297 4000.00 – 0.03000956 – 0.00299466
F 2 in C 1
Aster : 8284.34 5976.31 4000.0 – 0.0300098 – 0.00299450
R: 4916.724 4576.394 5000.00 0.0273532 – 0.001215646
 in C 1 Aster : 4916.62 4576.38 5000.0 0.0273536 – 0.00121583
Foot-note:
Calculation Aster was realized by taking very slim elements, so that: Sl 2 ≪ I . Thus, the energy of
inflection is prevalent. Values of calculation Aster are resulting from the CAS-test VPCS called
SSLL14 , with the following data:
I 1 =5.0 E−4 m4 ; I 2=2.5 E−4 m4 ; E=210 000 MPa
l
h=2a=8 m ; l=20 m ; b=  1.16
2
p=3000 N.m (downwards),
F 1=20 000 N (downwards),
F 2=10 000 N (towards the left),
=−100 000 Nm (direction switches of watch).

Code - Aster: SSLL14 - Gantry Plan Articulated in Foot

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Code - Aster: SSLL14 - Gantry Plan Articulated in Foot

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Version

SSLL14 - Gantry plan articulated in foot

Geometry of the gantry m :

Quadratic moments of the beams m4  :

The gantry consists of symmetrical beams of sections, so that IY = IZ.

1.2 Material properties

1.3 Boundary conditions and loadings

2.2 Results of reference

2.3 Uncertainty on the solution

3.2 Sizes tested and results

4 Summary of the results

5.2 Isostatic requests under real load distributed p on C 1 C

The part CB is articulated and charged only at its ends

From where isostatic reactions

5.3 Requests under concentrated force F 1 (downwards)

5.3.3 Diagrams ( F 1 downwards)

5.4 Requests under the concentrated force F 2 (towards the left)

5.5 Requests under the concentrated couple  (positive)

5.5.3 Diagrams (  positive)

5.6 Requests under the moment X hyperstatic

5.7 Requests under specific dummy loads in C

5.7.1 Reactions of support

5.8 Determination of the moment X hyperstatic

It is stationary with balance, from where:

The coefficient of flexibility  is the sum of:

5.8.1 Distributed load p on C 1 C

5.8.2 Concentrated loading F 1 in C

5.8.3 Concentrated loading F 2 in C 1

M 1 M iso b F 2 h 2ah 1 h F 2 bh3h 27ah 2a 2 

5.8.4 Specific couple  in C 1

5.9 Calculation of displacement in C

5.9.1 Distributed load p on C 1 C

5.9.2 Concentrated loading F 1 in C

w does not depend on f for this loading):

5.9.3 Concentrated loading F 2 in C 1

5.9.4 Specific couple  in C 1

d does not depend on f ):

5.9.6 Summary of displacements u c and v c

Comparison Aster - analytical reference (R.)

You might also like