REVISED 2020

SECTOR PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (SPCR) FORM

I, ___________ , Head of the ___________ ________, commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the following targets in accordance with the indicated measures for the period _____________________ .

______________________________________________________
Assistant Commissioner
Date:___ ___

Approved by:
______________________________________________________
COA Chairperson
Date:___ ___

PROGRAMS/ OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTED OFFICE / INDIVIDUALS RATING REMARKS
ACTIVITIES (Target + Measured) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET ACCOUNTABLE Quality Quantity Timeliness Average

Total
Average Rating (Total/No. of Outputs)
Average Rating X Weight Allocation
Final Average:
Adjectival Rating:
Assessed by/Rated by/Recommending Approval: Approved by:

______________________________ ______________________________
Chair, Steering Committee COA Chairperson
Date: _______________________ Date: _______________________

Rating
5.0 - Outstanding
4.0 to 4.999 - Very Satisfactory
3.0 to 3.999 - Satisfactory
2.0 to 2.999 - Unsatisfactory
1 of 12
 PROGRAMS/ OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTED OFFICE / INDIVIDUALS RATING REMARKS
ACTIVITIES (Target + Measured) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET ACCOUNTABLE Quality Quantity Timeliness Average
1.0 to 1.999 - Poor

2 of 12
 REVISED 2020
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (OPCR) FORM

We, ___________ and ___________ , Director and Assistant Director, respectively, of the ___________ ________, commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the following targets in accordance with the indicated
measures for the period _____________________ .

______________________________________________________
Director IV
Date:___ ___

______________________________________________________
Director III
Date:___ ___

Approved by:
______________________________________________________
Assistant Commissioner
Date:___ ___

PROGRAMS/ OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTED DIVISION / INDIVIDUALS RATING REMARKS
ACTIVITIES (Target + Measured) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET ACCOUNTABLE Quality Quantity Timeliness Average

Total
Average Rating (Total/No. of Outputs)
Average Rating X Weight Allocation
Final Average:
Adjectival Rating:
Assessed by/Rated by/Recommending Approval: Approved by:

______________________________ ______________________________
Assistant Commissioner Chair, Steering Committee
Date: _______________________ Date: _______________________
Date: _______________________
I certify that I have discussed and understood COA SPMS with the rater. I certify that I have discussed and explained in detail COA SPMS to the ratee.

______________________________ ______________________________
Ratee Rater
Date: _______________________ Date: _______________________
Date: _______________________

Rating
5.0 - Outstanding
4.0 to 4.999 - Very Satisfactory
3.0 to 3.999 - Satisfactory
2.0 to 2.999 - Unsatisfactory
3 of 12
 PROGRAMS/ OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTED DIVISION / INDIVIDUALS RATING REMARKS
ACTIVITIES (Target + Measured) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET ACCOUNTABLE Quality Quantity Timeliness Average
1.0 to 1.999 - Poor

4 of 12
 REVISED 2020
DIVISION PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (DPCR) FORM

I, ___________ , Head of the ___________ _____, commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the following targets in accordance with the indicated measures for the period _________________ .

________________________________________________
Service Chief/Division Chief or Equivalent
Date: _____________
Recommending Approval:

________________________________________________
Assistant Head of Office
Date: _____________
Approved by:

________________________________________________
Head of Office
Date: _____________
SUCCESS INDICATORS RATING (80%) REMARKS
PROGRAMS/ACTIVITIES OUTPUTS ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS ALLOTED INDIVIDUALS
(Target + Measured) BUDGET ACCOUNTABLE Quality Quantity Timeliness Average

Total Average:
Personality:
Leadership:
Final Rating:
Adjectival Rating:
Personality (10%) Leadership (10%)
1. Carriage and Appearance 1.Initiative
2. Self Confidence 2. Interest in Work / Persistent Work Effort
3. Compliance with Existing Rules and Regulations and Adherence to COA Core Values 3. Dependability and Reliability
4. Acceptance of Suggestions and Criticisms 4. Decision Making Capabilities
5. Getting Along Well with Others
Comments and Recommendations for Development Purposes: (based on IDP)

Assessed by/Rated by/Recommending Approval: Approved by:

_______________________________
Assistant Head of Office Head of Office
Date: _________________ Date: _________________
I certify that I have discussed and understood COA SPMS with the rater. I certify that I have discussed and explained in detail COA SPMS to the ratee.
______________________________ ______________________________
Ratee Rater
Date: _______________________ Date: _______________________
Date: _______________________
Rating
5.0 - Outstanding
4.0 to 4.999 - Very Satisfactory
3.0 to 3.999 - Satisfactory
5 of 12
 SUCCESS INDICATORS RATING (80%) REMARKS
PROGRAMS/ACTIVITIES OUTPUTS ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS ALLOTED INDIVIDUALS
(Target + Measured) BUDGET ACCOUNTABLE Quality Quantity Timeliness Average

2.0 to 2.999 - Unsatisfactory

1.0 to 1.999 - Poor

6 of 12
 REVISED 2020
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (IPCR) FORM (for SG 24 and above)

I, ___________________, commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the following targets in accordance with the indicated measures for the period ___________________.

________________________________________________
Individual Employee
Date: _____________
Recommending Approval:

________________________________________________
Service Chief/Division Chief or Equivalent
Date: _____________
Approved by:

________________________________________________
Assistant Head of Office
Date: _____________
SUCCESS INDICATORS RATING (80%) REMARKS
PROGRAMS/ACTIVITIES OUTPUTS (Target + Measured) ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS Quality Quantity Timeliness Average

Total Average:
Personality:
Leadership:
Final Rating:
Adjectival Rating:
Personality (10%) Leadership (10%)
1. Carriage and Appearance 1.Initiative
2. Self Confidence 2. Interest in Work / Persistent Work Effort
3. Compliance with Existing Rules and Regulations and Adherence to COA Core Values 3. Dependability and Reliability
4. Acceptance of Suggestions and Criticisms 4. Decision Making Capabilities
5. Getting Along Well with Others
Comments and Recommendations for Development Purposes: (based on IDP)

Assessed by/Rated by/Recommending Approval: Approved by:

______________________________________________ _______________________________
Service Chief/Division Chief or Equivalent Assistant Head of Office
Date: _________________ Date: _________________
I certify that I have discussed and understood COA SPMS with the rater. I certify that I have discussed and explained in detail COA SPMS to the ratee.

______________________________ ______________________________
Ratee Rater
Date: _______________________ Date: _______________________
Rating
5.0 - Outstanding
4.0 to 4.999 - Very Satisfactory
3.0 to 3.999 - Satisfactory
7 of 12
 SUCCESS INDICATORS RATING (80%) REMARKS
PROGRAMS/ACTIVITIES OUTPUTS (Target + Measured) ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS Quality Quantity Timeliness Average

2.0 to 2.999 - Unsatisfactory

1.0 to 1.999 - Poor

8 of 12
 REVISED 2020
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (IPCR) FORM (for SG 23 and below)

I, ___________________, commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the following targets in accordance with the indicated measures for the period ___________________.

________________________________________________
Individual Employee
Date: _____________
Recommending Approval:

________________________________________________
Service Chief/Division Chief or Equivalent
Date: _____________
Approved by:

________________________________________________
Assistant Head of Office
Date: _____________
SUCCESS INDICATORS RATING (90%) REMARKS
PROGRAMS/ACTIVITIES OUTPUTS (Target + Measured) ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS Quality Quantity Timeliness Average

Total Average:
Personality:
Leadership:
Final Rating:
Adjectival Rating:
Personality (10%)
1. Carriage and Appearance
2. Self Confidence
3. Compliance with Existing Rules and Regulations and Adherence to COA Core Values
4. Acceptance of Suggestions and Criticisms
5. Getting Along Well with Others
Comments and Recommendations for Development Purposes: (based on IDP)

Assessed by/Rated by/Recommending Approval: Approved by:

_______________________________
Service Chief/Division Chief or Equivalent Assistant Head of Office
Date: _________________ Date: _________________
I certify that I have discussed and understood COA SPMS with the rater. I certify that I have discussed and explained in detail COA SPMS to the ratee.

______________________________ ______________________________
Ratee Rater
Date: _______________________ Date: _______________________
Rating
5.0 - Outstanding
4.0 to 4.999 - Very Satisfactory
3.0 to 3.999 - Satisfactory
9 of 12
 SUCCESS INDICATORS RATING (90%) REMARKS
PROGRAMS/ACTIVITIES OUTPUTS (Target + Measured) ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS Quality Quantity Timeliness Average

2.0 to 2.999 - Unsatisfactory

1.0 to 1.999 - Poor

10 of 12
 REVISED 2017
SUMMARY LIST OF INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE RATINGS

OFFICE Performance Assessment:

Rating
DIVISION A Numerical Adjectival
Rating
Employee 1
Employee 2
Employee 3
Employee 4
No. of Employees
Average Ratings of Staff

Rating
DIVISION B Numerical Adjectival
Rating
Employee 1
Employee 2
Employee 3
Employee 4
No. of Employees
Average Ratings of Staff

Rating
DIVISION C Numerical Adjectival
Rating
Employee 1
Employee 2
Employee 3
Employee 4
No. of Employees
Average Ratings of Staff

Rating
DIVISION D Numerical Adjectival
Rating
Employee 1
Employee 2
Employee 3
Employee 4
No. of Employees
Average Ratings of Staff

Rating
Summary: Numerical Adjectival
DIVISION A
DIVISION B
DIVISION C
DIVISION D
Average