3821ICT – THIRD YEAR PROJECT

PEER EVALUATION – Semester 2

This report is intended to provide your assessors with a confidential indication of how evenly workloads and
contributions are shared among group members. All students are required to complete this review. Your
opinions will remain confidential as far as the teaching staff are concerned; that is, we will not identify any
individual reports in discussions with other students. General discussions of the issues raised may occur.

A. IDENTIFICATION

Student Name: _______Chin Wei Lian__________

Team Number: ______2_____

B. Distribute 19 points to the members of your team (excluding yourself) for each of the following
categories. Total points for each category (ie each horizontal row) should add to 19. Higher points
imply more contribution and lower points imply less contribution.

Sam Josh Kane Blake Liam TOTAL

1. Amount of work contributed 19 19 19 19 19 19
2. Attendance at team meetings 19 19 17 19 17 19
3. Quality of individual meeting 19 19 19 19 19 19
participation
4. Completion of assigned work 19 19 19 19 19 19
within schedule
5. Quality of assigned work 19 19 19 19 17 19

6. Individual's value and overall 19 19 19 19 19 19

contribution to team
TOTAL POINTS 114 114 112 114 110 114

C. Rank the members of your group (excluding yourself) in the categories below. Try not
to place all members in the same category.

1. Best Performer(s): Josh

2. Good Performer(s): Sam, Kane, Blake
3. Average Performer(s): Liam
4. Minimal performer(s)

D. Add any comments you would like to make about any aspects of the team, the course or
the project.

For the team, one of our member Liam still cannot access the course content yet. So he does
not know when is due of every sprint. The course does not provide any feedback that show us
where can we improve from last sprint due. Some documentation template is not very precise
and lack of information. I would like to thank my team members for their concerted efforts to
complete this project.