Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PROFILE 2 - EXPRESSION
Teacher’s Signature*: Date:
* Please note that there is a choice to either print and then manually sign this form or the next option is
to digitally sign the form when the Teacher’s Signature field is clicked. It should be noted, however, that
once the signature has be digitally created in the field, it cannot be removed and therefore it is strongly
suggested that a blank copy is saved for further use. Also please note, that if you create a digital
signature, it generates a signature file on your PC that can be used to sign other editable PDF forms.
June 2024
ENGLISH LANGUAGE
SCHOOL BASED ASSESMENT (SBA)
THEME:
TOPIC:
NAME:
SUBJECT: ENGLISH A
CENTER NUMBER:100080
CANDIDATE NUMBER:
SCHOOL: MORANT BAY HIGH SCHOOL
TERRITORY: JAMAICA
YEAR OF EXAM: 2024
TEACHER: MISS GORDON
To be submitted in partial fulfilment of the English “A” CXC examination May 2024
2|Page
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
3|Page
Acknowledgement
4|Page
TABLE OF CONTENT
5|Page
Table of Content
Plan of Investigation…………………………………………………………………………...8-9
Piece one – Online Newspaper Article
……………………………………………………………………………………….10-12
Piece two- Journal
……………………………………………………………………………………………….13-15
Piece Three -Poem
………………………………………………………………………………………………. 16-17
Reflection One ……………………………………………………………………………… 18-19
Reflection Two ……………………………………………………………………………...20-21
Reflection three………………………………………………………………………………22-23
Participation Measure………………………………………………………………………24-25
Group Written Report ………………………………………………………………………26- 28
Pieces of Group written Report………………………………………………………………29-37
Oral Presentation Plan……………………………………………………………………….38-39
Reference…………………………………………………………………………………….40-41
Scoring Rubric……………………………………………………………………………….42-43
6|Page
PLAN OF INVESTIGATION
7|Page
Plan of Investigation
8|Page
THE ARTEFACTS
9|Page
PIECE ONE -
10 | P a g e
PIECES TWO –
11 | P a g e
PIECE THREE-
12 | P a g e
REFLECTION ONE (1)
13 | P a g e
Reflection One
14 | P a g e
REFLECTION TWO (2)
15 | P a g e
Reflection Two
16 | P a g e
REFLECTION THREE (3)
17 | P a g e
Reflection three (3)
18 | P a g e
PARTICIPATION
MEASURES
19 | P a g e
PARTICIPATION MEASURE
B. SCORING RUBRIC FOR INDIVIDUAL PARTICIPATION
Name of Student:
Date:
The total mark for Individual Participation will be 5 marks based on the responses
obtained from the sessions conducted by the teacher.
Areas Questions for students Final
Score
1. Do/Did you know what you are/were expected to do to work well in a
team? /1
4. Do/Did you know how to manage how you behave in the group?
/1
5. Do/ Did you manage your tasks on time and thoroughly
/1
Total Marks /5
Total Score
NOTE: This scale should be completed by the teacher in discussion with the student on two
different occasions. After the first assessment, discussion should take place and feedback should
20 | P a g e
be given to the student to allow for improvement. The second assessment should produce the
final mark out of five agreed on by the teacher and student.
21 | P a g e
GROUP WRITTEN REPORT
22 | P a g e
PIECES FOR THE GROUP
WRITTEN REPORT
23 | P a g e
PIECE ONE
24 | P a g e
PIECE TWO (2)
25 | P a g e
PIECE THREE
26 | P a g e
ORAL PLAN
PRESENTATION
27 | P a g e
Oral Presentation Plan
Plan for the Oral Presentation
Title:
Genre Chosen:
Justification of Genre:
Source of Inspiration:
Literary Inspiration:
Language Used:
Summary:
28 | P a g e
REFERENCE
29 | P a g e
References
30 | P a g e
Scoring Rubric
31 | P a g e
A. SCORING RUBRIC FOR PLAN OF INVESTIGATION
Name:
Date:
/10
Total marks for Plan of Investigation = 10 marks
32 | P a g e
Name of Student: Demar Easy
Date:_______________________________
The total mark for Individual Participation will be 5 marks based on the responses obtained from the sessions co
nducted by the teacher.
5. Yes Do/ Did you manage your tasks on time and thoroug
hly /1
/5
Total Score
NOTE: This scale should be completed by the teacher in discussion with the student on two different occasions. Aft
er the first assessment, discussion should take place and feedback should be given to the student to allow for impr
ovement. The second assessment should produce the final mark out of five agreed on by the teacher and student.
33 | P a g e
Name of Group :
Date: _____________________________________________________
Group members Group members eng Group members engag Group members engage
show no evidenc aged in reflection on ed in reflection on work d in reflection on work a
6 e of reflecting on work is at the end of at the end of most of th t the end of all of the a
Reflection* their work some of the activitie e activities or sessions ctivities or sessions /3
s or sessions
There is obvious Members attempt to Members are actively Members respect and
7 misunderstandin resolve issues and pr creating interaction wit appreciate each other; a
Interaction g oblems to ensure a c h nd /3
among member omfortable relations each other and displayi show empathy to all me
s. hip among group me ng mbers
Members feel dis mbers trust and respect
tant
/10
Total Score
Score awarded group = 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑆𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑒=______________* (*Round up to the next nearest whole number)
3
Name of Teacher: ________________________________ Time/Date: __________________________
NOTE TO TEACHER: The mark awarded is a group mark. All students receive the same mark.
34 | P a g e
1 2 3 4
Does not meet the require The required number of s Context in /from which stimuli are Contexts in/ from which
d number of pieces timuli has been selected b chosen are explicitly given. the stimuli are chosen a
1. Content Stimuli chosen are of little r ut some of the issues are There is evidence of the procedures re explicitly given.
elevance or a weak attempt only implied. used in selecting the three stimuli There is clear evidence
is made to force relevance Some tasks are noted but Some of the issues associated with of the procedure used i
Only one or two tasks atte generally there seems to the stimuli are not clearly stated (m n selecting the three sti
mpted be inadequacy, and lack o ore information is needed) muli
f clarity. There is indication of the tasks to b Issues raised( in the sti
The report indicates an u e done but some aspects are left ou muli) are clearly define
nderstanding of tasks but t d and fully explored
execution is insufficient All relevant tasks (proce
sses, procedures) which
should have been/ are t
o be performed by gro
up members and descri
bed in the reporting are
noted and defined.
Weak response to the task Analysis focuses on some Excellent response to the tasks:
s: (focus, summary, analysi of the key issues. (focus, summary, analysis)
s) Good evidence of researc Analysis focuses on the key issu
2. Evidence of Issues not clearly identified h
es.
investigation Inadequate evidence of res Good handling of docume
Findings of discussions and rese
earch ntation with the occasion
al error. arch of the relevance to the sti
mulus material are clearly state
d
All sources of the various stimul
i are acknowledged and docum
ented.
Any comments on the stimuli, a
part from students’ original co
mments, are appropriately ackn
owledged and documented
3. Language u The report: The report: very good con The report:
se and vocabu Good control of basic gram trol of language (gramma Excellent use of Standard English in
lary mar, vocabulary and mecha r and vocabulary) – errors the appropriate tone and register
nics. do not suggest lack of cap The vocabulary shows excellent kn
Competent sentence struct acity owledge of and interaction with th
ure but lacking in maturity e issues and context.
of expression
Name of student: :
Name of assessor: ________________________________
Time/Date of assessment: ___________ /_____________
Time Date
E. SCORING RUBRIC FOR ORAL PRESENTATION
35 | P a g e
Rating Scale
Facets of Tasks 0 1 2 3 4
1. Fluency of jerky, halting choppy awkward but acc Intelligible; clear;
delivery fragmentary eptable smooth;
long pauses intonation; well-paced flow
continuous;
natural
2. Structure, connections with to Connections Limited compreh Coherent; Clear organisation of i
Comprehensibility, pic/issue with topic/iss ension Key issues well de deas;
and development o unclear; ue lacks elaboratio veloped Sustained treatment
f topic incomprehensible; unclear; n; Well expressed in of
key issues not depic Very incohere Slightly incohere many topic/theme/issues;
ted; nt in parts; nt in parts; parts; very effecti Style very effective an
style of presentatio Utterance inc Somewhat limite ve style d
n does orrect d; impactful in communi
not always aid in de cating
picting
the key issues
3. Language use lacks basic words; Ideas limited t Adequate style of Accurate use o
and vocabulary lack specificity; o inadequate presentation f grammar
very many errors in words and jar Basic sentences are Effective use of
words gon used; grammar
and sentences Lacks specifici Control of basic gra and vocabular
ty mmatical y;
Limited range structures; High degree of
of grammar Reliance on practic fluency;
al Rich vocabular
expressions; y
Name of student:
36 | P a g e
1. Theme factors – critical knowledge related to theme, how material shaped thinking.
5 marks /5
37 | P a g e
38 | P a g e