Silanga National High School

TEACHERS' LEARNING OBSERVATION GUIDE (TLOG)

Started: Finished:
Teacher: Date:
Position: Subject & Area:
Topic: Grade & Section:

Instruction: Read the performance indicators below and rate each item as:
5 Outstanding (Skilled in the identified areas)
4 Very Satisfactory (Has almost mastered the Skills)
3 Satisfactory (Average manifestation of Skills)
2 Unsatisfactory (Below average manifestation of Skills)
1 Poor

P US S VS O REMARKS /
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
5 4 3 2 1 AGREEMENTS
I. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT
1. Classroom was structured to ehance learning 5
2. IM's/Board works wereprepared before the class 5
3. Good arrangement of chairs and table 5
4. Students/Teachers were in proper attire 5
5. Maintained cleanliness/orderliness in and out 5
6. General room appearance 5
Average Rating I 30 5.00

II. TEACHING-LEARNING PROCESS

The Teacher:
1. Presented the LP before the discussion 5
2. Checked assignment/homework 5
3. Clearly formulated the objectives 5
4. There was motivation given to arouse the students' interest 5
5. Showed proficiency in the required language of instruction 5
6. Employed varied teaching strategies and techniques throughout the lesson 5
7. Asked the students HOTS questions 5
8. Presented the lesson that captures the interest of the students 5
9. Used real life situations in the lesson 5
10. Provided varied learning activities congruent to the lesson 5
11. Acted as facilitator during the classroom discussion 5
12. Processed the concepts for students' better understanding 5
13. Showed overall mastery of the topic 5
14. Provided harmonious environment inside the classroom 5
15. Utilized technology in delivering the lesson 5
16. Gave assignment/homework as follow-up 5
The Learner:
17. Were actively engaged throughout the lesson 5
18. Asked/Answered questions of HOTS 5
19. Were generally happy in the class 5
20. Were generally motivated to learn more 5
Average Rating II 100 5.00

III. ASSESSMENT OF LEARNERS

1. Learning was evaluated through seat work excercise; paper test;
5
performance test portfolio assessment

2. Learners' other needs were diagnosed after the lesson 5

3. The lesson was assessed to determine if the objectives were attained within
the allotted time 5

4. Class proficency level 5

Average Rating III 20 5.00

IV. CLASSROOM INTERACTION

1. Learner-Teacher Interaction 5
2. Learner-Learner Interaction 5
3. Learner-Materials Interaction 5
Average Rating IV 15 5.00
Evaluation Result:
No. of Passers 12 No. of Passers
CPL = x 100
No. of Students 15 No. of Students
CPL 80.00%

Plus Factor on Holding Power

Today's Attendance 0 Today's Attendance
HP = x 100
Monthly Enrolment 0 Monthly Enrolment
HP #DIV/0!

Rating Scale: Descriptive Rating:

4.76 and above = Outstanding
4.00 to 4.75 = Very Satisfactory (Above Average)
3.00 to 3.99 = Satisfactory/Average
2.00 to 2.99 = Unsatisfactory (Below Average)
1.00 to 1.99 = Poor

SUMMARY OF RATING:
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Weight Ave. Rating Points
I. Classroom Management 20% 5.00 1.00
II. Teaching-Learning Process 50% 5.00 2.50
III. Learner Assessment 20% 5.00 1.00
IV. Classroom Interaction 10% 5.00 0.50
TOTAL 100% TOTAL 5.00

DESCRIPTIVE RATING OUTSTANDING

Observed/Rated by:

RHUM O. BERNATE
Dept. Head/MT-I Principal I

Conforme:

0 Date:
(Signature Over Printed Name)
Teacher Observed/Rated:
 OBSERVATION SHEET

TEACHER: SCHOOL: DISTRICT: STARTED:

GRADE: SUBJECT: DATE: FINISHED:

Attendance
Today Monthly
M M
F F
T 0 T 0

Objective(s):
1
2
3

WHAT WENT WELL/STRENGHT (+) WHAT DID NOT GO WELL/AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT (-)

Observed/Rated by:

RHUM O. BERNATE
Dept. Head/MT-I Principal I
Date: ____________________
Conforme:

0
(Signature Over Printed Name)
Teacher Observed/Rated:
Date: ____________________
 Silanga National High School
TEACHERS' LEARNING OBSERVATION GUIDE (TLOG)
Started: Finished:
Teacher: Date:
Position: Subject & Area:
Topic: Grade & Section:

Instruction: Read the performance indicators below and rate each item as:
5 Outstanding (Skilled in the identified areas)
4 Very Satisfactory (Has almost mastered the Skills)
3 Satisfactory (Average manifestation of Skills)
2 Unsatisfactory (Below average manifestation of Skills)
1 Poor

P US S VS O REMARKS /
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
5 4 3 2 1 AGREEMENTS
I. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT
1. Classroom was structured to ehance learning
2. IM's/Board works wereprepared before the class
3. Good arrangement of chairs and table
4. Students/Teachers were in proper attire
5. Maintained cleanliness/orderliness in and out
6. General room appearance
Average Rating I

II. TEACHING-LEARNING PROCESS

The Teacher:
1. Presented the LP before the discussion
2. Checked assignment/homework
3. Clearly formulated the objectives
4. There was motivation given to arouse the students' interest
5. Showed proficiency in the required language of instruction
6. Employed varied teaching strategies and techniques throughout the lesson
7. Asked the students HOTS questions
8. Presented the lesson that captures the interest of the students
9. Used real life situations in the lesson
10. Provided varied learning activities congruent to the lesson
11. Acted as facilitator during the classroom discussion
12. Processed the concepts for students' better understanding
13. Showed overall mastery of the topic
14. Provided harmonious environment inside the classroom
15. Utilized technology in delivering the lesson
16. Gave assignment/homework as follow-up
The Learner:
17. Were actively engaged throughout the lesson
18. Asked/Answered questions of HOTS
19. Were generally happy in the class
20. Were generally motivated to learn more
Average Rating II

III. ASSESSMENT OF LEARNERS

1. Learning was evaluated through seat work excercise; paper test;
performance test portfolio assessment

2. Learners' other needs were diagnosed after the lesson

3. The lesson was assessed to determine if the objectives were attained within
the allotted time

4. Class proficency level

Average Rating III

IV. CLASSROOM INTERACTION

1. Learner-Teacher Interaction
2. Learner-Learner Interaction
3. Learner-Materials Interaction
Average Rating IV
Evaluation Result:
No. of Passers No. of Passers
CPL = x 100
No. of Students No. of Students
CPL

Plus Factor on Holding Power

Today's Attendance Today's Attendance
HP = x 100
Monthly Enrolment Monthly Enrolment
HP

Rating Scale: Descriptive Rating:

4.76 and above = Outstanding
4.00 to 4.75 = Very Satisfactory (Above Average)
3.00 to 3.99 = Satisfactory/Average
2.00 to 2.99 = Unsatisfactory (Below Average)
1.00 to 1.99 = Poor

SUMMARY OF RATING:
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Weight Ave. Rating Points
I. Classroom Management 20%
II. Teaching-Learning Process 50%
III. Learner Assessment 20%
IV. Classroom Interaction 10%
TOTAL 100% TOTAL

DESCRIPTIVE RATING

Observed/Rated by:

RHUM O. BERNATE
Dept. Head/MT-I Principal I

Conforme:

Date:
(Signature Over Printed Name)
Teacher Observed/Rated:
 OBSERVATION SHEET

TEACHER: SCHOOL: DISTRICT: STARTED:

GRADE: SUBJECT: DATE: FINISHED:

Attendance
Today Monthly
M M
F F
T T

Objective(s):
1
2
3

WHAT WENT WELL/STRENGHT (+) WHAT DID NOT GO WELL/AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT (-)

Observed/Rated by:

RHUM O. BERNATE
Principal I
Date: ____________________
Conforme:

(Signature Over Printed Name)

Teacher Observed/Rated:
Date: ____________________