Professional Documents
Culture Documents
edu
Abstract
This tutorial paper illustrates the traditional hand calculation methods of structural analysis to
determine the shear force and bending moment diagrams for statically determinate beams of
differing support conditions and loading.
Case (i) start with a simple beam case to illustrate the general approach:
P=20kN
5m 5m
HA
RA RB
20 x 5 = RB X 10
RB = 10kN
RA = 20 - 10 = 10kN
orcid.org/0000-0002-2072-2209
academia.edu
(Check = RB)
10kN
A
+ B
- -10kN
orcid.org/0000-0002-2072-2209
academia.edu
50kNm
0kNm 0 kNm
A B
Case (ii) introducing further loading types + cantilever, & follow similar approach as above
P=20kN
4m 8m 4m
WUDL = 5kN/m
HA
RA RB
RB x 12 = (20x4) +[(4 x 5)x14] note: moments due to P & WUDL are in same rotational direction
about A
RA = 40-30= 10kN
orcid.org/0000-0002-2072-2209
academia.edu
(Opposing directions)
RA – P = 10 – 25 = -15kN
R A – P + RB =
10 – 25 + 30 = 15kN
orcid.org/0000-0002-2072-2209
academia.edu
-
-15kN -15kN
Discussion: note the triangular shear force diagram shape due to the UDL. Support shear forces =
support reactions.
BM at LHS of B (x0=8.0m)
= (RA x 12)-(25 X 8)
=(10x12)–200 = -80kNm
orcid.org/0000-0002-2072-2209
academia.edu
-40kNm
B 0kNm
0kNm
A
X0= 6.667m
-80kNm
Discussion: The parabolic shape of the BM is due to the UDL on the cantilever span. The shear force
diagram shape equals the gradient of the BM diagram. For point loads, the resultant bending
moments is triangular in shape with a constant gradient on the shapes sides, hence there will a
constant shear force value along that length of the beam. For UDLs, the BM profile is parabolic and
the shape gradient is constantly changing along the length of the span under consideration, giving a
varying shear force value. Refer to the associated shear force diagram for this case. For combined
load types, the associated SFD and BMD shapes can be superimposed.
orcid.org/0000-0002-2072-2209
academia.edu
P1 = 5kN P2 = 10kN
wUDL = 5kN/m
HB
2m 2m 10m 4m
RA RB
RB x 10 + (10x14) + (5x2) = [(5x10)x5] note: moments due to RB, P1 & P2 are in same rotational
direction about A
RB = (250–140-10)/10 = 10kN
RA = 45-10= 35kN
Cantilever end span, shear force will be constant along the free span
length from P1 to A & by inspection zero to LHS of P1 to free tip
orcid.org/0000-0002-2072-2209
academia.edu
= 5 – 10 + 50 = 45kN
= 5 – 10 + 50 – 35 = 10kN
RB = 35kN
10kN 10kN
5kN 5kN
RA=10kN
-5kN
P1 RA RB P2
Discussion: note the parts of the SFD diagram where the shear force value is constant over a length
of the span. By inspection, this will inform the shape of the BMD noting that the gradient of the BMD
equals the shear force. Both end cantilever spans have a constant SF whilst over the length of the
main central span the SF is varying. This informs a straight line BMD profile at the end spans and a
parabolic shape over the central span.
orcid.org/0000-0002-2072-2209
academia.edu
Discussion: the BMD shape over the central span is due to the UDL which will tend towards a
parabolic shape. Therefore, to plot the BMD with some degree of accuracy, the BM at a series of
intermediate cut-lines can be determined. For the purposes of this case example, the BM at 1m
intervals between A & B is calculated, noting that the BM at support (xo=0m) is 10kNm as above:
orcid.org/0000-0002-2072-2209
academia.edu
BM at cut-line:
10kNm
P1 RA RB P2
Discussion: also note that the SFD profile changes direction coincident with changes in the gradient
of the BMD slope. Refer to SFD for this case.
Case (iv) – beam with locked-in moment and varying distributed load
HA
15m 5m
RRAA RRBB
10
orcid.org/0000-0002-2072-2209
academia.edu
Discussion: between A & B, the shear force varies from 100kN to -50kN. The load is a varying
distribution and the shape of the shear force diagram over this portion of the span will be parabolic.
Therefore, the shear force values will be calculated at a series of 1m intervals to obtain the shape.
11
orcid.org/0000-0002-2072-2209
academia.edu
Using these intermediate values of shear force, the SFD can be constructed
96.7kN
RA
X0= 6.06m -53.3kN
-50kN
RB
Discussion: the end moment M = 50kNm, induces a lock-in moment along the end cantilever
MC = 50kNm
12
orcid.org/0000-0002-2072-2209
academia.edu
Discussion: the moment over B due to Mc “locks-in” a twisting acting along the span that is constant
along the end cantilever span to B & tapers to zero at support A in the gradient of M/L along the
main span = (50/15) kNm/m. Therefore, the effect of MC is an adjustment to the moment induced by
the VDL. To obtain the BM profile along the main span due to the VDL, consider cut lines at intervals
of 1m:
X0= 6.06m
BM
(kNm)
RA RB MC
13
orcid.org/0000-0002-2072-2209
academia.edu
B C D
RA
100kN
0
A B C D
10 10 10 10
BM at D = 0 BM at RHS of C = 0
Discussion: by reference to the SFD, the shape of the BMD will be of straight line profile between A &
B. Between B & C the BMD gradient will change with increasing xO to a value of zero at C and
remaining at zero to the end of span at D. The area of each portion of the SFD equals the BMD
value at that point.
14
orcid.org/0000-0002-2072-2209
academia.edu
1050kNm
250kNm
0kNm
A B C D
10 10 10 10
Discussion: note that the area under the SFD = (100x8) + ½(100x5) = 1050kNm. This serves as
a useful cross check between the SFD & BMD. Similarly, the area under the SFD from x0=8m =
½(100x5) = 250kNm.
Concluding Remarks
This tutorial paper is intended to assist engineering students with their understanding of
beam analysis and the development of shear force and bending moment diagrams. A
traditional hand calculation approach that is based upon visualising the beam in discrete
sections and balancing the shears and moments is presented. A range of beam
configurations and loading actions has been considered.
15
orcid.org/0000-0002-2072-2209