You are on page 1of 7

Philosopher Metaphysics Axiology Society and Change

Government
Cosmology Ontology Epistemology Ethics Aesthetics

Buddha The Buddha A Buddha seek a Buddha Buddha The time of Buddhism

of Pali prominent middle way proposes a see historical has not really

Nikayas concern of between the threefold aesthetics Buddha, change over

accepts the Buddha is extremes of understandi as an Buddhism has time. Its main

cosmology to provide dogmatism ng of action: values and both influence focus has

characteristi a solution and mental, experience. governments stayed the

c of his to the skepticism, verbal and When we and been same. The

cultural problem of emphasizing bodily. experience identified by main focus is

context: a suffering. personal the world, governments to maintain

universe When experience, a we as a source of enlightenme

with several asked pragmatic experience their authority nt and to

realms of about his attitude and not only the and reach

existence, teaching, the use of “just-there- legitimacy. Nirvana.

where the critical thinking ness” of Even though

people are Buddha toward all things, but many people

1
reborn and answers types of also the have lost

die again that he knowledge. “what-they- sight of

and again only are-for-us” Buddha’s

(samsara) teaches of them. teaching,

depending suffering Cultures nuns and

on their past and its and monks still

actions cessation. individuals teach his

(karma) until may differ teaching and

they attain as to how still try to

salvation they define enlightenme

(moksa). what is nt in their life

However, especially to reach

the Buddha ethical, Nirvana.

substantially beautiful, or

modifies the true, but

cosmology every

of his time. culture and

every
2
person

apprehends

these

realms of

value in

roughly the

same way.

Plato’s

Plato cosmologica Plato’s Plato’s Plato Developing Plato believes Plato said

l thoughts is philosophy epistemology maintains a Plato’s that conflicting that real

the universe the ideas is a theory of virtue- doctrine of interest of things

is governed are not knowledge. based the different parts (Forms) don’t

by a rational only real Platonic eudemonisti beautiful, of society can change, and

Mind that objects epistemology c concept of Plato points be restricted

orders it as ontological holds that ethics. That out that is a harmonized. change to

much as ly knowledge of is to say, series of The best, the realm of

possible speaking, Platonic ideas happiness beautiful rational and appearances


3
rational but they is innate, so or well- things that righteous, - the physical

principles. are the that learning is being are called political order, world.

These authentical the (eudaimoni not only which he Parmenides

principles ly objects development a) is the beautiful proposes, went farther

govern of of ideas buried highest aim people and leads to still, denying

motions, knowledge deep in the of moral the body harmonious the existence

cosmic and . soul, often thought and are unity of of change

psychologic under the conduct, beautiful. society and altogether.

al, that are midwife-like and virtues Fine are allows each His account

cyclical. The guidance of are the also called parts to is designed

human soul interrogator. requisite works of flourish, but to explain

is rational, skills and art. Plato’s not at the both how

but also in disposition philosophy expense of change in

some sense needed to was posed others. The general is

“fallen”, for it attain it. in a theoretical possible, and

inhabits our completely design and how coming

earthly different practical into

bodies way. His implementatio existence is


4
rather than aesthetics n of such possible.

celestial is the least order, he

realm. “philosophy argues, are

of art”. impossible

Plato’s without virtue.

aesthetic is

mythologic

al ontology

of the

beautiful,

that is the

doctrine of

the being of

the

beautiful,

and not the

philosophy
5
of art.

Plato’s

teaching

the

beautiful is

rendered in

it beyond

the

boundaries

of art,

placed high

above art-in

the sphere

of

existence

beyond the

reach of the

world,
6
barely

discernible

by thought

of man, as

long as he

remains a

sensible

person.
References: Internet encyclopedia of Philosophy, Oxford bibliographies.com, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, Stanford

Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Wikipedia, and Easierwithpractice.com

CREATED BY: DONNA D.DORADO

You might also like