Professional Documents
Culture Documents
𝒃𝒄𝟑
𝑰𝑻𝑹 = + 𝒏𝑨𝑺 (𝒅 − 𝒄)𝟐
𝟑
𝑅𝐴 = 33.75𝑘𝑁
The maximum negative moment is at point B.
∑ 𝑀𝐵 = 0
80 12 12
𝑀𝑚𝑎𝑥−𝑛𝑒𝑔 − ( ) − 30 ( ) = 0
3 6 3
𝑀𝑚𝑎𝑥−𝑛𝑒𝑔 = 14.444𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚
the maximum positive moment will occur at the point of zero shear which
is determined below
Solution: ∑ 𝐹𝑉 = 0
First, we determine the reactions. 𝑥 𝑥
𝑅𝐴 − 30 ( ) ( ) = 0
9 2
𝑥 = 4.5𝑚
∑ 𝑀𝐴 = 0
𝑥 𝑥 2𝑥
30 ( ) ( ) ( ) − 𝑀𝑚𝑎𝑥−𝑝𝑜𝑠 = 0
∑ 𝑀𝐴 = 0 9 2 3
9 2
𝑅𝐵 (8) − 30 ( ) ( ) (9) = 0 𝑀𝑚𝑎𝑥−𝑝𝑜𝑠 = 101.25𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚
2 3
𝑅𝐵 = 101.25𝑘𝑁
In determining the stresses at the point of maximum positive moment, the 𝜋
𝐴𝑆 = (162 )(4) = 804.2477𝑚𝑚^2
section properties are first computed. 4
𝐴𝑆 804.2477
200 𝜌𝑛 = 𝑛 = 9( ) = 0.045957
𝑛= = 8.51 𝑠𝑎𝑦 9 𝑏𝑑 250(630)
4.7√𝑓′𝑐
𝜋 𝑐 = [−𝑛𝑝 ± √(𝑛𝑝)2 + 2𝑛𝑝] 𝑑
𝐴𝑆 = (252 )(4) = 1963.495𝑚𝑚^2
4 = [−0.045957 + √(0.045957)2 + 2(0.045957)] (630)
𝐴𝑆 1963.495
𝜌𝑛 = 𝑛 = 9( ) = 0.1122 = 𝟏𝟔𝟒. 𝟐𝟐𝟖𝒎𝒎
𝑏𝑑 250(630)
𝑏𝑐 3
2 250(164.228)3 2
𝑐 = [−𝑛𝑝 ± √(𝑛𝑝)2 + 2𝑛𝑝] 𝑑 = [−0.1122 + √(0.1122)2 + 2(0.1122)] (630) 𝐼𝑇𝑅 = + 𝑛𝐴𝑆 (𝑑 − 𝑐) = + 9(804.2477)(630 − 164.228)
3 3
= 𝟐𝟑𝟔. 𝟎𝟏𝒎𝒎 = 𝟏. 𝟗𝟑𝟗𝟒𝒙𝟏𝟎𝟗 𝒎𝒎𝟒
The concrete and rebar stresses can be determined using the maximum negative
𝑏𝑐 3 250(236.01)3 2 moment
𝐼𝑇𝑅 = + 𝑛𝐴𝑆 (𝑑 − 𝑐)2 = + 9(1963.495)(630 − 236.01)
3 3 𝑀𝑐 14.444(106 )164.228
= 𝟑. 𝟖𝟑𝟗𝒙𝟏𝟎𝟗 𝒎𝒎𝟒 𝑓𝑐 = = = 𝟏. 𝟐𝟐𝟑𝟏𝟓𝑴𝒑𝒂
𝐼𝑇𝑅 1.9394𝑥109
The concrete and rebar stresses can be determined using the maximum positive 𝑀(𝑑 − 𝑐)𝑛 14.444(106 )(630 − 164.228)9
moment 𝑓𝑠 = = = 𝟑𝟏. 𝟐𝟐𝟏𝟎𝟓𝑴𝒑𝒂
𝐼𝑇𝑅 1.9394𝑥109
𝑀𝑐 101.25(106 )236.01 Or
𝑓𝑐 = = = 6.2245𝑀𝑝𝑎
𝐼𝑇𝑅 3.839𝑥109 𝑓𝑠 𝑀(𝑑 − 𝑐) 14.444(106 )(630 − 164.228)
= =
𝑛 𝐼𝑇𝑅 1.9394𝑥109
𝑀(𝑑 − 𝑐)𝑛 101.25(106 )(630 − 236.01)9
𝑓𝑠 = = = 93.52𝑀𝑝𝑎
𝐼𝑇𝑅 3.839𝑥109 𝑓𝑠 = 𝟑𝟏. 𝟐𝟐𝟏𝟎𝟓𝑴𝒑𝒂
Or
𝑓𝑠 𝑀(𝑑 − 𝑐) 101.25(106 )(630 − 236.01) DOUBLY REINFORCED RECTANGULAR BEAMS
= =
𝑛 𝐼𝑇𝑅 3.839𝑥109
Doubly reinforced beams area called as such because aide from tension
𝑓𝑠 = 93.52𝑀𝑝𝑎 reinforcements there are also compression reinforcements as shown where the
section is subjected to positive moment, tension at the bottom and compression
At the point of negative moment, the stresses are determined following the same at the top.
procedure.
Doubly reinforced sections are resorted to when large moments have to be 𝑏𝑐 2
+ [(2𝑛 − 1)𝐴𝑆′ + 𝑛𝐴𝑆 )]𝑐 − [(2𝑛 − 1)𝐴𝑆′ 𝑑′ + 𝑛𝐴𝑆 𝑑] = 0
resisted but there are limitations to the beam size. Thus, additional moment 2
capacity is provided by introducing compression bars together with an increase in This will lead to a quadratic equation.
the tension bars. Let A = b/2
B = [(2𝑛 − 1)𝐴𝑆′ + (𝑛𝐴𝑆 )]
C = (2𝑛 − 1)𝐴𝑆′ 𝑑′ + 𝑛𝐴𝑆 𝑑
𝑏𝑐 3
𝐼𝑇𝑅 = + 𝑛𝐴𝑆 (𝑑 − 𝑐)2 + (2𝑛 − 1)(𝐴′𝑆 )(𝑐 − 𝑑′ )2
3
Stresses:
𝑀𝑐
𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒: 𝑓𝑐 =
𝐼𝑇𝑅
Creep flow is the plastic flow of concrete that occurs slowly ove a long period of 𝑀(𝑑 − 𝑐)𝑛
time when the concrete member is under a constant compressive stress. 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑙𝑒 𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑠 𝑓𝑠 =
𝐼𝑇𝑅
Concrete will undergo additional shortening or contraction. 𝑀(𝑐 − 𝑑′)2𝑛
𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑠 𝑓𝑠 ′ =
𝐼𝑇𝑅
𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑝 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 = 2𝑛
Example: determine the maximum concrete and steel stresses for the section
Compression area shown when subjected to a positive moment of 170Kn-m. Use fc’ 0f 30Mpa.
(𝑏𝑐 − 𝐴𝑆′ ) + 2𝑛𝐴𝑆 ′
Solution:
𝒃𝒄 + (𝟐𝒏 − 𝟏)𝑨𝑺 ′ 𝑑 ′ = 70𝑚𝑚
The two terms above can now be considered as two regular polygons. 3
𝑑 = 70 + 307.5 + (50) = 407.5𝑚𝑚
5
The location of the neutral axis is determined by summing of the moments of the 200
𝑛= = 7.77 𝑠𝑎𝑦 8
areas above and equating this to the sum of moments of the area below the 4.7√30
𝜋
neutral axis 𝐴𝑆 = 5 ( ) (25)2 = 2454.369𝑚𝑚2
4
∑ 𝑀𝑁𝐴 = 0 𝜋
𝐴𝑆 ′ = 3 ( ) (20)2 = 942.4778𝑚𝑚2
𝑐 4
𝑏𝑐 ( ) + (2𝑛 − 1)𝐴𝑆′ (𝑐 − 𝑑 ′ ) = 𝑛𝐴𝑆 (𝑑 − 𝑐)
2
−𝐵 ± √𝐵 2 + 4𝐴𝐶 A beam has a simple span length of 8.5m. Find the maximum deflection due to a
𝑐= uniform load of 15kN/m and the beam weight. Use fc’ = 20Mpa and unit weigh of
2𝐴
𝑏 300 concrete = 24Kn/m^3.
𝐴= = = 150𝑚𝑚
2 2
𝐵 = [(2𝑛 − 1)𝐴𝑆′ + (𝑛𝐴𝑆 )] = 15(942.4778) + 8(2454.369) = 33772.121
𝐶 = (2𝑛 − 1)𝐴𝑆′ 𝑑′ + 𝑛𝐴𝑆 𝑑 = 15(942.4778)(70) + 8(2454.369)(407.5)
= 8990845.475
𝐵 + √𝐵 2 + 4𝐴𝐶
𝑐= − = 156.892𝑚𝑚
2𝐴
𝑏𝑐 3
𝐼𝑇𝑅 = + 𝑛𝐴𝑆 (𝑑 − 𝑐)2 + (2𝑛 − 1)(𝐴′𝑆 )(𝑐 − 𝑑 ′ )2
3
(300)(156.892)3
𝐼𝑇𝑅 = + 8(2454.369)(407.5 − 156.892)2 Transform the rebar into equivalent concrete to have a homogeneous section.
3
+ (15)(942.4778)(156.892 − 70)2 = 𝟏𝟕𝟐𝟔. 𝟎𝟗𝟎𝟖𝒙𝟏𝟎𝟔 𝒎𝒎𝟒 200
𝑛= = 9.52 𝑠𝑎𝑦 10
Maximum concrete stress 4.7√20
𝜋
𝑛𝐴𝑠 = 10 ( ) (202 )(4) = 12566.3706𝑚𝑚2
4
𝑀𝑐 170(10)6 (156.892) Assume c = 100mm
𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒: 𝑓𝑐 = = = 15.452𝑀𝑝𝑎
𝐼𝑇𝑅 1726.0908𝑥106 350(100)(50) = 1750000(< 𝑜𝑟 > 12566.3706(550 − 100) = 5654867
1750000 < 5654867
Tensile and compressive steel stresses Therefore concrete area is not enough and needs to be increased in order that
the moment of the areas above and below the N.A. will be equal.
𝑀(𝑑 − 𝑐)𝑛 170(10)6 (407.5 − 156.892)(8)
𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑙𝑒 𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑠 𝑓𝑠 = =
𝐼𝑇𝑅 1726.0908𝑥106 𝑐 (𝑐 − 100)2
= 197.46𝑀𝑝𝑎 𝑐(350) ( ) − 200(
2 2
𝑀(𝑐 − 𝑑′ )2𝑛 170(10)6 (156.892 − 70)(16) = 12566.3706(550 − 𝑐)
𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑠 𝑓𝑠′ = ==
𝐼𝑇𝑅 1726.0908𝑥106
= 136.93𝑀𝑝𝑎 𝑐 = 173.561𝑚𝑚
IRREGULAR SECTIONS
350(173.561)3 − 200(173.561 − 100)3
𝐼𝑇𝑅 = + 12566.3706(550 − 173.561)2
3
= 2364.416𝑥106 𝑚𝑚4
The beam weight is determined as follows:
3.12𝑘𝑁
[0.35(0.6) − (0.2)(0.4)](24) =
𝑚
Total load :
3.12𝑘𝑁 15𝑘𝑁 𝟏𝟖. 𝟏𝟐𝒌𝑵
+ =
𝑚 𝑚 𝒎
The value of 𝛽1 has been established by the NSCP as follows:
The maximum deflection at the midspan of the beam:
𝐸𝐶 = 4700√20 = 21019.04𝑀𝑝𝑎
4
𝛽1 𝑖𝑠 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑵𝑺𝑪𝑷 𝑻𝒂𝒃𝒍𝒆 𝟒𝟐𝟐. 𝟐. 𝟐. 𝟒. 𝟑
5𝑤𝐿 5(18.12)(8𝑥1000)4
𝛿= = = 𝟏𝟗. 𝟒𝟒𝟔𝒎𝒎 𝛽1 = 𝟎. 𝟖𝟓 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑓𝑐 ′ ≤ 28𝑀𝑝𝑎
384𝐸𝐼 384(21019.04)(2364.416𝑥106 ) 𝟎. 𝟎𝟓
𝛽1 = 𝟎. 𝟖𝟓 − ( ) (𝒇𝒄′ − 𝟐𝟖)𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑓𝑐 ′ > 28𝑀𝑝𝑎
𝟕
𝛽1 ≥ 𝟎. 𝟔𝟓
∑𝐹 = 0
DESIGN OF BEAM USING ULTIMATE STRENGTH DESIGN (USD)
𝐶𝐶 = 𝑇𝑆
METHOD 𝐴𝑠𝑓𝑦 = 0.85𝑓𝑐′𝑎𝑏
BASED ON THE NSCP2015
∑ 𝑀 = 0 → 𝑀𝑁
𝑎
Singly Reinforced Rectangular Beams 𝑀𝑁 = (𝐶𝐶 𝑜𝑟 𝑇𝑆 )(𝑑 − )
2
According to the NSCP(Table 421.2.2), the usable portion of the nominal moment
capacity is only 90% or a reduction factor = 0.90. This is applicable to tension
controlled classification where the tensile strain of the rebar exceeds 0.005
Also, USD requires that
∅𝑀𝑁 ≥ 𝑀𝑢 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑀𝑢 𝑖𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑚𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡
Flexural members are required to be ductile. These members are designed to 𝐴𝑠𝑓𝑦 = 0.85𝑓𝑐′𝑎𝑏
undergo ductile failure when their ultimate capacities are reached. Ductile failure
is preferred over brittle failure because failure for the former is slow in 𝐴𝑠 0.85𝑓𝑐 ′ 𝑎
= ( )
developing and more than adequate tell-tale manifest before the section 𝑏𝑑 𝑓𝑦 𝑎
collapses. In contrast, brittle failure is sudden with little or no warning leading to Introducing the notation
disastrous consequences. 𝐴𝑠
𝜌=
𝑏𝑑
Maximum stee ratio, max And recognizing that 𝑎 = 𝛽1 𝑐 as per NSCP, the above equation becomes
0.85𝑓𝑐 ′ 𝑐
𝜌 = 𝛽1 ( )
𝑓𝑦 𝑑
𝟎. 𝟖𝟓𝒇𝒄′ 𝟑
𝝆𝒎𝒂𝒙 = 𝜷𝟏 ( )
𝒇𝒚 𝟕
Also, the code has a minimum steel ratio with the same objective of making the
beam section ductile. If the steel reinforcements are too few, then the effect of
the steel reinforcements is no longer felt as if the section is pure concrete only.
Concrete being a brittle material, will lead to brittle failure if the amount of
In order to ensure that the flexural member will be ductile, the amount of the
tension reinforcement is negligible. Therefore, there is a need to provide a
tension reinforcement is controlled. The NSCP ensures that the flexural member
minimum amount of steel reinforcements. This is specified in NSCP 409.6.1.2
will be under reinforced by prescribing a minimum strain of 0.004 for the tensile
where
reinforcement (Art. 409.3.3.1). It must be noted that under reinforced beam
sections will have larger strains in the tensile rebars. √𝑓𝑐′
𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝐴𝑠 = 0.25 𝑏 𝑑
𝑓𝑦 𝑤
From the stress strain diagram: The equation above can be rearranged such that
𝑐 0.003 3 𝑨𝒔 √𝒇𝒄′
= = 𝒑𝒎𝒊𝒏 = = 𝟎. 𝟐𝟓
𝑑 0.003 + 0.004 7 𝒃𝒘 𝒅 𝒇𝒚
From equilibrium equation However the NSCP stipulates further that this steel ratio should not be lower than
𝐶𝐶 = 𝑇𝑆 1.4/fy. Hence the minimum steel ratio is
√𝒇𝒄′ 𝟏. 𝟒
𝒑𝒎𝒊𝒏 = 𝟎. 𝟐𝟓 𝒐𝒓 𝒘𝒉𝒊𝒄𝒉𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓 𝒊𝒔 𝒍𝒂𝒓𝒈𝒆𝒓
𝒇𝒚 𝒇𝒚
Example
Analysis of a Singly Reinforced Rectangular Beam A simply supported beam shown is to support a total dead load of 15kN/m.
determine the live load that the beam can resist in accordance with the
The analysis procedure is outlined below requirements of NSCP2015. Use fc’ = 35Mpa and Grade 60. The reinforcements
1. Determine the 𝒑𝒎𝒊𝒏 and 𝝆𝒎𝒂𝒙 shown are 5-16mm bars.
2. Determine the actual steel ratio act
3. Compare the actual steel ratio act with 𝒑𝒎𝒊𝒏 and 𝝆𝒎𝒂𝒙
if act > 𝝆𝒎𝒂𝒙 then use = 𝝆𝒎𝒂𝒙
in this situation the existing reinforcement exceed the NSCP maximum
limit. Thus, only the amount of reinforcements corresponding limit is valid
𝟑
if act < 𝒑𝒎𝒊𝒏 then use = 𝟒 𝒑𝒂𝒄𝒕
in this situation, the existing reinforcement also are below the NSCP
minimum limit. However the NSCP has a provision (Art. 409.6.1.3) that
states that the minimum steel requirement can be waived if an additional Solution:
1/3 of the required reinforcement is provided. Conversely, for an existing 𝟎. 𝟎𝟓
𝛽1 = 𝟎. 𝟖𝟓 − ( ) (𝟑𝟓 − 𝟐𝟖) = 𝟎. 𝟖𝟎
beam section with reinforcements below the NSCP limit, then only the 𝟕
reciprocal 3/4of the actual reinforcements will be counted
𝟎. 𝟖𝟓𝒇𝒄′ 𝟑 0.85(35) 3
if 𝝆𝒎𝒂𝒙 > 𝒑𝒂𝒄𝒕 > 𝑝𝒎𝒊𝒏 then use = 𝒑𝒂𝒄𝒕 𝝆𝒎𝒂𝒙 = 𝜷𝟏 ( ) = 0.80 ( ) = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟐𝟒𝟔𝟑𝟖
𝒇𝒚 𝟕 414 7
this is the case where the NSCP steel reinforcement limits are complied
with and thus no reduction in the actual reinforcements is made
4. 𝐴𝑠 = 𝑏𝑑 √𝒇𝒄′ 𝟏. 𝟒
𝒑𝒎𝒊𝒏 = 𝟎. 𝟐𝟓 𝒐𝒓 𝒘𝒉𝒊𝒄𝒉𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓 𝒊𝒔 𝒍𝒂𝒓𝒈𝒆𝒓
5. Solve for “a” 𝒇𝒚 𝒇𝒚
6. Determine the moment capacity √35 1.4
𝑝𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 0.25 = 0.0035725 𝑜𝑟 = 0.0033816
𝑎 414 414
∅𝑀𝑁 = ∅𝐴𝑠𝑓𝑦 (𝑑 − ) 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 ∅ = 𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑚𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡
2
= 0.90 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒆 𝒖𝒔𝒆 𝒑𝒎𝒊𝒏 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟑𝟓𝟕𝟐𝟓
𝟑
𝒅 = 𝟑𝟓𝟎 + 𝟖𝟎 ( ) = 𝟑𝟗𝟖𝒎𝒎 ∑ 𝑀𝐴 = 0
𝟓
𝜋 𝑤(𝑥)2
𝐴𝑠 = 5 ( ) (36 ) = 5089.38𝑚𝑚2
2
− 𝑀𝑀𝐴𝑋 = 0
4 2
5089.38 𝑀𝑀𝐴𝑋 = 7.2938𝑤 𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚
𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑡 = = 0.05115
250(398)
𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝜌𝑚𝑎𝑥 < 𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑡 Now, this maximum moment is equated with the ultimate moment capacity of
Use 𝜌 = 𝜌𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 0.024638 the beam
𝐴𝑠 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟐𝟒𝟔𝟑𝟖(𝟐𝟓𝟎)(𝟑𝟗𝟖) = 𝟐𝟒𝟓𝟏. 𝟒𝟒𝟗𝟐𝟕𝟓𝒎𝒎𝟐 301.22𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚 = 7.2938𝑤𝑢
41.298𝑘𝑁
𝐴𝑠𝑓𝑦 𝟐𝟒𝟓𝟏. 𝟒𝟒𝟗𝟐𝟕𝟓(𝟒𝟏𝟒) 𝑤𝑢 = = 1.2𝑤𝐷 + 1.6𝑤𝐿𝐿 = 1.2(15) + 1.6(𝑤𝐿𝐿 )
𝑚
𝑎= = = 136.457𝑚𝑚
0.85𝑓𝑐′𝑏 0.85(35)(250) 𝒘𝑳𝑳 = 𝟏𝟒. 𝟓𝟔𝟏𝒌𝑵/𝒎
∑ 𝑀𝐶 = 0
The NSCP requires that
6.3
8𝑅𝐴 − 𝑤(6.3) ( + 1.7) = 0
2 ∅𝑀𝑁 > 𝑀𝑢
𝑀𝑢
𝑅𝐴 = 3.819375𝑤 𝑘𝑁 𝑀𝑁 =
∅
∑ 𝐹𝑉 = 0 𝑎 𝐴𝑠𝑓𝑦 𝐴𝑠𝑓𝑦
𝑀𝑁 = 𝐴𝑠𝑓𝑦 (𝑑 − ) = 𝐴𝑠𝑓𝑦 (𝑑 − ′
) = 𝐴𝑠𝑓𝑦𝑑(1 − )
2 1.7𝑓𝑐 𝑏 1.7𝑓𝑐 ′ 𝑏𝑑
𝑅𝐴 − 𝑤𝑥 = 0 𝑀𝑢 𝐴𝑠 𝐴𝑠𝑓𝑦
𝑥 = 3.819375𝑚 = 𝑓𝑦 (1 − ) 𝑏𝑑2
∅ 𝑏𝑑 1.7𝑓𝑐 ′ 𝑏𝑑
𝑀𝑢 𝑝𝑓𝑦
= 𝑝𝑓𝑦(1 − )𝑏𝑑 2
∅ 1.7𝑓𝑐 ′
𝑝𝑓𝑦
𝑙𝑒𝑡 𝑅 = 𝑝𝑓𝑦(1 − )
1.7𝑓𝑐 ′
𝑴𝒖
𝒃𝒅𝟐 =
∅𝑹
𝑀𝑢 𝑝𝑓𝑦
= 𝑝𝑓𝑦(1 − ′
)𝑏𝑑 2
∅ 1.7𝑓𝑐
2.3Pu = 289.8kN
𝑀𝑢 𝑝𝑓𝑦 𝑝2 𝑓𝑦
= 𝑝 (1 − ) = (𝑝 − ) wu = 26.8kN/m
∅𝑏𝑑2 𝑓𝑦 1.7𝑓𝑐 ′ 1.7𝑓𝑐 ′ There are 3 critical areas where moments are maximum, namely negative
𝑀𝑢
𝑙𝑒𝑡 𝑋 = moments at A, maximum positive moment within span AB, and negative
∅𝑏𝑑2 𝑓𝑦
cantilever moment at B.
𝑓𝑦
𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑚 =
0.85𝑓𝑐′
𝑝𝑓𝑦 0.0050725(414)
𝑅 = 𝑝𝑓𝑦 (1 − ) = 0.0050725(414)(1 − = 2.0135𝑀𝑝𝑎
1.7𝑓𝑐 ′ 1.7(30)
𝑴𝒖 566.98(106 )
𝑟𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝒃𝒅𝟐 = = = 312.87𝑥106
∅𝑹 0.9(2.0135)
𝒅
𝒃𝒖𝒕 =𝟐
𝒃
1/3
312.87𝑥106
𝑟𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝒃 = ( )
22
= 427.66𝑚𝑚, 𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑 − 𝑜𝑓𝑓 𝑡𝑜 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑛𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡 50𝑚𝑚, 𝑐ℎ𝑜𝑜𝑠𝑒 𝑏
= 𝟒𝟓𝟎𝒎𝒎
1/2
312.87𝑥106
𝑟𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝒅 = ( ) = 833.83𝑚𝑚
450
25
Design of Beam Section 𝑟𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝒉 = 833.83𝑚𝑚 + (50 + 12 + )
2
0.05 = 𝟗𝟎𝟖. 𝟑𝟑 𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑 𝑜𝑓𝑓 𝑡𝑜 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑛𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡 ℎ𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑟𝑒𝑑 = 𝟗𝟎𝟎𝒎𝒎
𝛽1 = 0.85 − ( ) (30 − 28) = 0.83571
7 25
𝟎. 𝟖𝟓𝒇𝒄′ 𝟑 0.85(30) 3 𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑑 = 900 − (50 + 12 + ) = 825.5𝑚𝑚
2
𝝆𝒎𝒂𝒙 = 𝜷𝟏 ( ) = 0.83571 ( ) = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟐𝟐𝟎𝟔𝟏
𝒇𝒚 𝟕 414 7
Steel reinforcement
Design of top bars at A:
𝑨𝑺 𝟒𝒑𝒃𝒅 4(0.0041609)(450)(828)
6 𝒏𝒐 𝒐𝒇 𝒃𝒂𝒓𝒔, 𝑵 = = =
𝑀𝑢 566.98(10 ) 𝑨𝒃 𝝅𝒅𝒃 𝟐 𝜋(20)2
𝑋= = = 0.0049622
∅𝑏𝑑2 𝑓𝑦 0.9(450)(825.5)2 (414) = 4.93 𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑠, 𝒔𝒂𝒚 𝟓𝒃𝒂𝒓𝒔
𝑓𝑦 414
𝑚= = = 16.235
0.85𝑓𝑐′ 0.85(30)
𝟏 − √𝟏 − 𝟐𝒎𝑿 𝟏 − √𝟏 − 𝟐(16.235)(0.0049622)
𝒑= = = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟏𝟓𝟏𝟎𝟕 < 𝒑𝒎𝒊𝒏
𝒎 6.235
= 0.0033816 Doubly reinforced Rectangular Beams
Consider a doubly reinforced section under positive moment shown
Therefore the amount of reinforcement shall be increased by an additional 1/3 as
long as the minimum in not exceeded:
𝟒 𝟒
𝒑 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟏𝟓𝟏𝟎𝟕 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟐𝟎𝟏𝟒𝟑 < 0.0033816
𝟑 𝟑
𝑨𝑺 𝟒𝒑𝒃𝒅 4(0.0020143)(450)(825.5)
𝒏𝒐 𝒐𝒇 𝒃𝒂𝒓𝒔, 𝑵 = = =
𝑨𝒃 𝝅𝒅𝒃 𝟐 𝜋(25)2
= 1.52 𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑠, 𝒔𝒂𝒚 𝟐𝒃𝒂𝒓𝒔
𝑐 − 𝑑′ 0.05
𝑓𝑠𝑐 = (600) 𝑎𝑙𝑠𝑜 𝑎 = 𝛽1 𝑐
𝑐 𝛽1 = 0.85 − ( ) (30 − 28) = 0.83571
𝒂 7
∅𝑴𝑵 = 𝟎. 𝟗𝟎 [(𝟎. 𝟖𝟓𝒇𝒄′ 𝒂𝒃) (𝒅 − ) + 𝑨′ 𝒔(𝒇𝒔𝒄 − 𝟎. 𝟖𝟓𝒇𝒄′ )(𝒅 − 𝒅′ )] 𝟎. 𝟖𝟓𝒇𝒄′ 𝟑 0.85(30) 3
𝟐 𝝆𝒎𝒂𝒙 = 𝜷𝟏 ( ) = 0.83571 ( ) ( ) = 0.022061
Example 𝒇𝒚 𝟕 414 7
𝑨𝒔 3078.8
𝝆= = = 0.02046
𝒅𝒃 300(501.6) 64
𝑑 = 600 − 78 − 2 ( ) = 496.4𝑚𝑚
Since 𝝆 < 𝝆𝒎𝒂𝒙 therefore the section will be analyzed as a singly reinforced 5
rectangular beam
𝐴𝑠𝑓𝑦 3078.8(414)
𝑎= = = 166.62𝑚𝑚
0.85𝑓𝑐′𝑏 0.85(30)(300)
𝑎 166.62 0.05
∅𝑀𝑁 = ∅𝐴𝑠𝑓𝑦 (𝑑 − ) = 0.9(3078.8)(414) (501.6 − ) (10)−6 𝛽1 = 0.85 − ( ) (30 − 28) = 0.83571
2 2 7
= 𝟒𝟕𝟗. 𝟖𝟒𝒌𝑵 − 𝒎 𝟎. 𝟖𝟓𝒇𝒄′ 𝟑 0.85(30) 3
𝝆𝒎𝒂𝒙 = 𝜷𝟏 ( ) = 0.83571 ( ) ( ) = 0.022061
𝒇𝒚 𝟕 414 7
The beam shown has a height of 600mm and a width of 300mm. determine the 𝑨𝒔 4021.24
𝝆= = = 0.027003
maximum safe live load that the beam can carry. The dead load is the beam 𝒅𝒃 300(496.4)
weight plus a superimposed load of 15kN/m. The stirrup size is 12mm, the top bars > 𝝆𝒎𝒂𝒙 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒔𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒘𝒊𝒍𝒍 𝒃𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒚𝒛𝒆𝒅 𝒂𝒔 𝑫𝑹𝑩
are 2-20mm and the bottom bars are 5-32mm. the clear distance between layers
of bottom bars is the bar size, 28mm. Use fc’ = 30Mpa, grade 60 reinforcements 𝑨′𝒔 628.32
𝝆′ = = = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟒𝟐𝟏𝟗
and concrete cover of 50mm. 𝒅𝒃 300(496.4)
′
𝟎. 𝟖𝟓𝒇𝒄′ 0.85(30)
𝝆 − 𝝆 (𝟏 − ) = 0.027003 − 0.0004219 (1 − ) = 0.023044
𝒇𝒚 414
> 𝝆𝒎𝒂𝒙 = 0.022061
′
0.85𝑓𝑐 ′
𝐴𝑆 = [𝜌𝑚𝑎𝑥 + 𝜌 (1 − )] 𝑏𝑑
𝑓𝑦
0.85(30)
= [0.022061 + 0.0004219 (1 − )] (300)(496.4)
414
𝜋 = 3874.92𝑚𝑚^2
𝐴𝑆 = 5 ( ) (32)2 = 4021.24𝑚𝑚2
4
𝜋
𝐴′𝑆 = 2 ( ) (20)2 = 628.32𝑚𝑚2 Assuming that the compression bar yields:
4 𝐴𝑆 𝑓𝑦 − 𝐴′𝑆 (𝑓𝑦 − 0.85𝑓 ′ 𝑐) 3874.92(414) − 628.32(414 − 0.85(30))
The effective depth d 𝑎= =
0.85𝑓𝑐 ′ 𝑏 0.85(30)(300)
= 𝟏𝟕𝟕. 𝟕𝟗𝟑𝒎𝒎
Check for fsc using hooke’s law Design of doubly reinforced rectangular beams
20
𝑑′ = 50 + 12 + = 72
2
177.793
𝑐 − 𝑑′ − 72
𝑓𝑠𝑐 = (600) = 0.83571 (600) = 396.94𝑀𝑝𝑎 < 𝑓𝑦 = 414𝑀𝑝𝑎
𝑐 177.793
0.83571
Therefore results indicate that the compression bar do not yield.
Compute c using
𝐴𝑆 𝑓𝑦 = 0.85𝑓𝑐 ′ 𝑎𝑏 + 𝐴′𝑆 (𝑓𝑠𝑐 − 0.85𝑓 ′ 𝑐)
𝑐 − 𝑑′)
𝐴𝑆 𝑓𝑦 = 0.85𝑓𝑐 ′ 𝛽1 𝑐𝑏 + 𝐴′𝑆 ( (600) − 0.85𝑓 ′ 𝑐) 0.85𝑓𝑐 ′ 3
𝑐 𝜌𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝛽1 ( )
𝑓𝑦 7
(0.85𝑓𝑐 ′ 𝛽1 𝑏)𝒄𝟐 − (𝐴𝑆 𝑓𝑦 − 600𝐴′ 𝑠 − 0.85𝑓𝑐′𝐴′ 𝑠)𝒄 − 600𝐴′ 𝑠𝑑′ = 0 𝑝𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝑓𝑦
𝑅𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝑝𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝑓𝑦 (1 − )
1.7𝑓𝑐 ′
0.85(30)(0.83571)(300)𝒄𝟐 𝑀𝑀𝐴𝑋 = 𝑅𝑚𝑎𝑥 ∅𝑏𝑑 2
− [(3874.92)(414) − 600(628.32) − 0.85(30)(628.32)]𝒄
− 𝟔𝟎𝟎(628.32)(72) = 0 This value of Mmax is compared eith the design factored moment Mu. If MMAX is
greater than MU, then the section dimensions b and d are enough to design the
𝒄 = 𝟐𝟏𝟒. 𝟐𝟖𝒎𝒎 beam as singly and the design procedure for singly is followed
Otherwise, when MU>MMAX the beam will have to be designed as doubly.
𝑐 − 𝑑′
𝑓𝑠𝑐 = (600) = 398.89𝑀𝑝𝑎
𝑐 𝑨𝑺𝟏 = 𝝆𝒎𝒂𝒙 𝒃𝒅 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑻𝑺𝟏 = 𝑨𝑺𝟏 𝒇𝒚
𝑻𝑺𝟏
𝒂 𝑻𝑺𝟏 = 𝐶𝑐 = 0.85𝑓𝑐 ′ 𝑎𝑏 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑔𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑠 𝑎 =
∅𝑴𝑵 = 𝟎. 𝟗𝟎 [(𝟎. 𝟖𝟓𝒇𝒄′ 𝒂𝒃) (𝒅 − ) + 𝑨′ 𝒔(𝒇𝒔𝒄 − 𝟎. 𝟖𝟓𝒇𝒄′ )(𝒅 − 𝒅′ )] 0.85𝑓𝑐 ′ 𝑏
𝟐 𝒂
𝑴𝑴𝑨𝑿 = 𝑴𝟏 = 𝑻𝑺𝟏 (𝒅 − )
𝟐
214.28𝑥0.83571 𝑴𝑼
∅𝑴𝑵= 0.90 [(0.85(30)(214.28𝑥0.83571)(300) (496.4 − ) 𝑴𝟐 = − 𝑴𝑴𝑨𝑿
2 ∅
+ 628.32(398.89 − 0.85(30))(496.4 − 72)] (10−6 )
𝑴𝟐 𝑻𝑺𝟐
= 𝟓𝟗𝟏. 𝟏𝟐𝒌𝑵 − 𝒎 𝑻𝑺𝟐 = ′
𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑨𝑺𝟐 =
𝒅−𝒅 𝒇𝒚
𝑪𝒔 = 𝑻𝑺𝟐 𝑝𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝑓𝑦 0.028047(276)
𝑅𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝑝𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝑓𝑦 (1 − ′
) = 0.028047(276) (1 − )
1.7𝑓𝑐 1.7(25)
𝑪𝒔 = 𝑨′𝑺 𝒇𝒔𝒄 𝒘𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆 𝒇𝒔𝒄 𝒊𝒔 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒔𝒕𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒔 𝒊𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒃𝒂𝒓 = 6.311𝑀𝑝𝑎
Example
This is now the situation where the compression region is no longer rectangular A simply supported joist shown has a span length of 4.3m. The total dead load
and is now considered as “irregular” carried by the joist is 25kN/m. The material properties are fc’ = 35Mpa and grade
In analyzing irregular beam the nominal moment capacity is divided into two : MF 60 reinforcements made up of 4-20mm diameter bars. Determine the maximum
and MW as shown live load(kN/m) that the joist can carry.
𝐴𝑆𝑊 = 𝐴𝑆 − 𝐴𝑠𝑓 = 1256.6— 1724.6 = 2981.3𝑚𝑚2
𝐴𝑆𝑊 2981.3
𝑝𝑤 = = = 0.017746
𝑏𝑤 𝑑 320(525)
0.05
𝛽1 = 0.85 − ( ) (50 − 28) = 0.80
7
0.8(0.85)(35) 3
𝑝𝑚𝑎𝑥 = ( ) = 0.024638 > 𝑝𝑤
Assume a = 100mm 414 7
𝜋(202 )
𝐴𝑆 = 4 = 1256.6𝑚𝑚2 Since 𝑝𝑤 < 𝑝𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑒.
4
𝑇 = 𝐴𝑆 𝑓𝑦 = 1256.6(414) = 520248𝑁
𝐶 = 0.85𝑓𝑐 ′ 𝑎𝑏𝑒 = 085(35)(100)(80) = 238000𝑁 𝐴𝑆𝑊 𝑓𝑦 2981.3(414)
𝑎= = = 129.65𝑚𝑚
Since C < T therefore a>100mm. The analysis will proceed with the section 0.85𝑓𝑐′𝑏𝑤 0.85(35)320
𝑎 129.65
considered as irregular 𝑀𝑊 = 𝐴𝑆𝑊 𝑓𝑦 (𝑑 − ) = 2981.3(414) (525 − ) (10−6 ) = 567.97𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚
2 2
𝑏𝑤 = 120 + 80 + 120 = 320𝑚𝑚
0.85(35)(100)(80 − 320)
𝐶𝑓 = 0.85𝑓𝑐 ′ 𝑡𝑠 (𝑏𝑒 − 𝑏𝑤 ) = = −714𝑘𝑁 𝑀𝑈 = ∅(𝑀𝑓 + 𝑀𝑊 ) = 0.9(−339.15 + 567.97) = 205.94𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚
1000
The maximum moment of the simply supported beam is
𝑑 = 100 + 425 = 525𝑚𝑚 𝑤𝑢 𝐿2
𝑀𝑈 =
8
100
𝑡𝑠 714 (525 − 2 ) 8(205.94)
𝑀𝑓 = 𝐶𝑓 (𝑑 − ) = − = −339.15𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚 𝑤𝑢 = = 89.103𝑘𝑁/𝑚
2 1000 4.32