Describe the data using the measures of central tendency and variation.

DATA 1. Pre-board Scores of the Selected BS Educatio

Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5
45 45 25 70 61
23 23 36 84 82
34 56 78 64 100
56 89 43 81 56
52 32 98 52 95
35 44 21 93 36
42 22 64 14
28 20 92 54
31 94
65
Mean
Median
Mode
Variance
SD
* Answer the following using excel computation
on. ANSWER THE FOLLO
cted BS Education Students (per Section) EXCEL CO
Section 6 Section 7 Section 8 Section 9 Section 10 1) Which section p
45 40 45 30 56 board exam?
65 61 23 32 45
60 32 73 40 50
43 83 75 60 56
Write yo
56 44 40 52 30
40 45 80 42 50
57 66 36 77 56
34 47 100 45 2) Which section is
43 38 90 50 pre-b
45 19

Write yo

using excel computations only

ANSWER THE FOLLOWING AFTER YOU APPLY
EXCEL COMPUTATIONS
1) Which section perfromed well in the pre-
board exam? Explain statistically.

Write your answer here..

2) Which section is the most consistent in the

pre-board? Why?

Write your answer here..

 A principal would like to determine the level of proficiency of the teachers of the s
determining the level of proficiency based from 50 random students with
1 = Beginning 2 = Advanced 3 = Proficient 4 = Highly Proficient 5=D
INDICATORS 5 4 3 2 1
1) Mastery of content knowledge. 20 9 17 3 1
2) Providing safe, secure, fair, and supportive 15 23 10 2 0
learning environment.
3) Establishing learning environment that are 29 8 7 5 1
responsive to learner diversity.
4) Interaction to the local and international 9 18 11 8 4
curriculum requirements.

5) Applying a variety of assessment tools and

strategies in monitoring, evaluating, documenting 38 10 1 1 0
and reporting learners’ needs, progress and
achievement.
6) Establishing school-community partnerships aimed 26 14 7 3 0
at enriching the learning environment.
7) Value personal growth and professional 14 15 12 7 2
development .
GRAND WEIGHTED MEAN

Interpretation:

Write your interpret

the teachers of the school. She used 5-point Likert scale in
ndom students with a verbal interpretation below:
4 = Highly Proficient 5 = Distinguished
Total Score Weighted Mean Verbal Interpretation
50
50

50

50

50

50

50

Write your interpretation here

 First Quarter Exam Scores of Students under Three Sections Problem 1: Can we say that the quarter exam sc
Grade 6 - Santan Grade 6 - Champaka Grade 6 - Sampaguita mean of 34
44 43 39
37 27 17
24 23 32
26 36 46
33 32 47
41 31 21
48 37 42
29 39 49
28 30 33
38 28 18
36 45 30
31 41 31
48 40 38
46 36 26
47 28 34
41 41
20 30
32
31
29

35.45 34.4 33.7647058823529

Problem 1: Can we say that the quarter exam scores of the students of Grade 6 - Santan is higher than population
mean of 34 using 5% level of significance?

Null Hypothesis (Ho): μ ≤ 34

Alternative Hypothesis (Ha): μ > 34

t-Test: One-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances

Grade 6 - Santan
Mean 35.45
Variance 71.52368
Observations 20
Hypothesized Mean Difference 34
df 19
t Stat 0.766758
P(T<=t) one-tail 0.226324
t Critical one-tail 1.729133
P(T<=t) two-tail 0.452648
t Critical two-tail 2.093024 Fail to reject
Reject
-1.73 0 1.73

Variables Mn SD t value t critical Decision

1st Quarter Exam of Grade 6 students 34
1st Quarter Exam of Grade 6 -Santan 35.45 8.46 p/n 0.77 p/n 1.73 Fail to Reject Ho
Based on the table, it can be seen that the mean score of Grade 6 -Santan which is 35.45 with a standard
deviation of 8.46 is better than the mean score of all the other Grade 6 students. On the other hand, the
researcher failed to reject the null hypothesis because the t-value which is p/n 0.77 is less than the t-
critical value of p/n 1.73. Faiure to reject the null hypthesis means that the mean score of Grade 6 students
is lower than 34.
Problem 2: Reject the statement that the quarter exam scores of the students of Grade 6 - Sampaguita is lower than
population mean of 35 using 5% level of significance?

Null Hypothesis (Ho): μ ≥ 35

Alternative Hypothesis (Ha): μ < 35

t-Test: One-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances

Grade 6 - Sampaguita
Mean 33.76
Variance 94.69118
Observations 17
Hypothesized Mean Difference 35
df 16
t Stat -0.523408
P(T<=t) one-tail 0.303932
t Critical one-tail 1.745884
P(T<=t) two-tail 0.607864
t Critical two-tail 2.119905

-1.75 0 1.75

Variables Mn SD t value t critical

1st Quarter Exam of Grade 6 students 35
1st Quarter Exam of Grade 6- Sampaguita 33.76 9.73 p/n 0.52 p/n 1.75
Based on the table, it can be seen that the mean score of Grade 6 -Sampaguita which is 33.76 with a
standard deviation of 9.73 is lower than the mean score of all the other Grade 6 students. On the other hand
the researcher failed to reject the null hypothesis because the t-value which is p/n 0.52 is less than the t-
critical value of p/n 1.75. Faiure to reject the null hypthesis means that the mean score of Grade 6 students i
lower than 35.
de 6 - Sampaguita is lower than Problem 3: Is there a significant difference between thequarter exam scores of the students
Sampaguita employing 5% level of significance?

Null Hypothesis (Ho): μ (Champaka) = μ (Sampag

Alternative Hypothesis (Ha): μ (Champaka) ≠ μ (Sampa

t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances

Grade 6 - Champaka
Mean 34.4
Variance 42.6857143
Observations 15
Hypothesized Mean Difference 0
df 30
t Stat 0.21899165
P(T<=t) one-tail 0.41412252
t Critical one-tail 1.70113093
P(T<=t) two-tail 0.82824504
t Critical two-tail 2.04840714

-2.05

Decision
Fail to Reject Ho
ita which is 33.76 with a
de 6 students. On the other hand,
h is p/n 0.52 is less than the t-
mean score of Grade 6 students is
Variables Mn
1st Quarter Exam of Grade 6 Champaka 34.40
1st Quarter Exam of Grade 6- Sampaguita 33.76
Based on the table, it can be seen that the mean score of Grade 6 -Sampaguita which i
is lower than the mean score of Grade 6 -Champaka with a mean score of 34.40 and w
other hand, the researcher failed to reject the null hypothesis because the t-value wh
value of p/n 2.05. Faiure to reject the null hypthesis means that there is no significant
Exams of Grade 6 Champaka and Grae 6 Sampaguita.
thequarter exam scores of the students of Grade 6 - Champaka and Grade 6 -
employing 5% level of significance?

μ (Champaka) = μ (Sampaguita)
μ (Champaka) ≠ μ (Sampaguita)

Grade 6 - Sampaguita
33.7647058823529
94.6911764705883
17

0 2.05

SD t value t critical Decision

6.53
9.73 p/n 0.22 p/n 2.05 Fail to Reject Ho
an score of Grade 6 -Sampaguita which is 33.76 with a standard deviation of 9.73
mpaka with a mean score of 34.40 and with a standard deviation of 6.53. On the
null hypothesis because the t-value which is p/n 0.22 is less than the t-critical
hesis means that there is no significant difference between the First Quarter
aguita.