FRIT 7237: Evaluation of Educational Needs and Programs

Article Critique #1
Brittany Alexander

Dr. Hodges
Fall 2020
 Article Critique #1

Grant, M. M., Ross, S. M., Wang, W., & Potter, A. (2005). Computers on wheels: An alternative
to 'each one has one'. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(6), 1017-1034.
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00571.x

Summary

After thoroughly reviewing the article by Grant, Ross, Wang, and Potter, the overall

concept was to focus on the study of decreasing the ratio of computers to students in the

classroom. The schools focused on teachers’ positive technology competence and confidence by

using various studies to incorporate engaging technology within the classroom. The study also

includes the impact of technology integration such as teachers’ pedagogy, teacher technological

knowledge, and supportive community. Overall the article wants to persuade schools to use

COW as an alternative in the classroom so that it can change teacher practice and student

learning and encourage a one to one ratio with technology to students to better enhance their

learning.

Analysis

             According to Grant et al. (2005), “As computer technologies continue to increase

there has been a movement to decrease the computer to student ratio” (p.1). The biggest

challenge to decrease the computer to student ratio will always be due to funding. For example,

“one principal admitted his middle school had invested well over one million in laptop

technology since 2000” (Grant et al.,2005, p.2). Funding plays a major part in decreasing the

computer to student ratio. If supplying every student and teachers with technology, there are

other options in doing so. Such as sharing a laptop cart, purchasing individual laptop carts for

classrooms or grade levels, or BYOT (Bring Your Own Technology). I believe after reading this

article there are pros and cons to having a one to one ratio with technology versus traditional
learning. For the pros, students will be able to focus on having their own laptops in front of them

while completing their assignments. Students are also more engaged with technology. Lastly,

students are less disruptive while being on the device. The cons I believe would be students not

understanding the basics of the technology such as using the keyboard, mouse, being able to

understand the basic terminology when it comes to using the laptop. Students also do not take

care of their device which would cause wear and tear. Lastly, students are forgetful when it is

time to charge their laptop for class. Overall, the article was very informative and relatable

because due to virtual learning my students were having issues with the one to one ratio in our

county, which focus our superintendent to take out a grant to purchase laptops for our 3rd-12th

grade students. Technology is a key component for learning because it helps with engaging our

students, reaching achievement gaps, and assessing their learning. I believe all schools should

have a one to one ratio to better their students.