Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DAR ES SALAAM
CLIENT:
NATIONAL HOUSING CORPORATION
P O BOX 2977
DAR ES SALAAM
By:-Gogdfrey Mgaya
1: SITE MAPS AND LOCATIONS
LOCATION
N
- Site Location
: Victoria, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
- Site Area
: 2065.475m2 SITE
-Charicteristics
: The site topography relative flat,
currently not developed. Site
Dar es salaam
1: SITE MAPS AND LOCATIONS
SITE LOCATION
N
2: SITE BOUNDARIES AND REFERENCE POINTS
NEIGBHOURHOOD AND ACCESSIBILITY
-Services
The site is surrounded with services
At all sides; Bagamoyo road, Filling
station and the road to Hubert
Kairuki Hospital, NMB bank. which
means the site well accessible and
close to services.
CLIMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE SITE
t
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
This is the mean mDnrhly relative humidity
Humidity
Jan Feb Ma r Apr May Jun Jul .4ug Sep Cut Nov Etc
Average relative humidity in Dar Es Salaam. Tanzania Copyright 2015 '-•-+. 'other-and<Iimate.com
Precipitation
40 °C
Max tern p
Mintemp
30 °C
% 20 °C
10 °C
0°C
Feb Jun Sip
Average min and max tern peratures in Ear Es Salaam, Tanzania Copyright @ 2015 www.wuther-and-climate
Wind pressure,
pattern and direction
nd on
Sun – path
( east to west)
CLIMATIC ANALYSIS OF
THE SITE
Annually sun-path
Annually sun-path
passes on top of the
site from east to
west
CLIMATIC ANALYSIS OF
THE SITE
Daily sun-path
Confortability
DB 24.4 c
Rh 26.9 %
Ah 5.2 g/kg
WB 13.4 C
SELECTED DESIGN STRATEGIES
Passive solar heating
Thermal mass effects
Dehumification
Natural ventilation
orientation of the building 12.5° from north
DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
Construction materials:
Hints:
Site layout and planning
construction VIVA
TOWER: Dar-
Finishing materials and usage es-salaam
style.
CASE CASE STUDY and prototype design
STUDY
Case 1: GRIESHOFGASSE, by
HELMUT WIMMER
Grieshofgasse, by
Address: Helmut Wimmer
Context: urban
Number of
Storeys: 5-storey
Number of
9
Units:
Case 2:KANCHANJUNGA APARTMENTS
designed by Le Corbusier
A combination of folding
furniture and sliding walls
allows different configurations
for day and night.
Le Corbusier argues that the
purchaser is paying for 46m2
of space but through the
cleverness of the design is
actually getting 71m2 of
effective space.