ASSIGNMENT ON ORGANIZE SYSTEM AND MODELS, MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES AND IMPLEMENTATION

FOR PUBLIC PLANNING

INSTRUCTOR: Dr. Rex Llonora

PCPT EDRESE O. AGUIRRE

PCPT MICHAEL AARON M. ALCANTARA
PCPT MICHAEL JUSTIN T. BALDUGO
PLT CHRISTIAN L. EDQUIBAL
PLT NICOMEDES B. VALDEZ, JR.
PCPT RONAN Y. VILLAGONZALO
PSOBC 2020-03

1. Inter-agency Coordination (government agencies)

Main Problems Problem Analysis Interventions Strategies Used Expected Result
Disaster  Philippines  Coordinati  Community Forging relationships
response with as a on with Oriented with partner
LGU disaster or local Policing agencies shall create
calamity Disaster Sytem a harmonious
prone Risk (COPS) and working conditions
country, Reduction Policing and with the
much is and undertaken community to foster
expected manageme with various better understanding
from the nt Council community of shared
local (DRRMC) sectors responsibility in
governme and PAG- including peacekeeping and
nts which ASA before LGU. disaster mitigation.
are the  Barangay
considered foreseeabl Peacekeepi
to be the e event. ng
core of a  Pre- Operations
communit emotive (BPKO), a
y. actions catch-all
 The LGU with LGUs strategy in
wasn’t such as the
able to alerting maintenanc
assess the residents, e of peace
vulnerabili evacuation and order
ties of the and including
area and security disaster
its plans and manageme
constituen ensuring nt and
t,(2) instill readiness control
basic of programmi
knowledge necessary ng.
of natural equipment  Creation of
disasters s and Barangay
and the supplies. Peacekeepi
 possible ng Action
impacts,(3) Teams
conduct an (BPAT) to
informatio render
n and tailor-made
education services for
campaign endeavors
on disaster on security,
mitigation, conflict
(4) resolution
coordinate and crisis
with manageme
officials in nt including
charge of disaster
planning, mitigation.
constructio
n, health
and
welfare.

2. Inter-agency Cooperation (government and private/community)

PNP Anti-  Different  There must Private Partnership.  Dynamic
cybercrime legal be synergy  PNP’s participation
group (PNP- systems among the utilization of both
ACG) strategic between following of the other public and
thrust on countries; componen sector’s private
cybercrime and variations ts: resources sector
cyber security in national Competen through creates an
cybercrime ce and information appropriate
laws; capability disseminati response in
differences building of on and actual
in the rules the education cybercrime
of organizatio and tapping suppression
evidence n and of and such
and personnel, significant responses
criminal public and private may be
procedure private companies coordinated
by which partnershi like quickly.
law p, Telephone  Forging
enforceme internation companies alliances
nts al (TELCO), with
authorities cooperatio Internet different
can access n, Service foreign law
digital advocacy Providers enforcement
evidence. and public (ISPs), IT and
 Lack of a awareness Schools, ICT international
universally and Companies, organization
implement vendors.
accepted ation of  Tapping of s will enable
and strong financial sharing of
comprehe laws, institutions best
nsive policies to share practices,
taxonomy and expertise evolving
of regulations on system sissies and
cybercrime . manageme initiate
seriously nt, incident reforms for
impedes response an active
internation and security approach
al efforts matters. and further
to development
accurately Public Partnership .
identify,  Strong
report and inter-
monitor agency
cybercrime cooperation
trends. with
National
Bureau of
Investigatio
n (NBI),
Department
of Justice
(DOJ) and
other
similar
government
agencies to
pool
resources.

International
Cooperation
 Partnership
with ally
nations by
signing
multilateral
agreements
concerning
cybercrime
and
security.
 Partnership
with
Internation
al Agencies
(Pacific
Computer
Emergency
response
Team,
Cybercrime
Teachnolog
y
Information
Network
System,
etc.).