Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ultimate: Strength
Ultimate: Strength
S2
Long Columns. Long columns are more slender
thus fails nby buckling of the member (bending
deformations increase with secondary moments, S3
P – Δ effect).
L1 L2
ULTIMATE STRENGTH DESIGN : R E I N F O R C E D C O N C R E T E C O L U M N
DESIGN PRINCIPLE
Wu
Girder
Column
ULTIMATE STRENGTH DESIGN : R E I N F O R C E D C O N C R E T E C O L U M N
DESIGN PRINCIPLE
RD
L3
L2
L1
Ground
ULTIMATE STRENGTH DESIGN : R E I N F O R C E D C O N C R E T E C O L U M N
DESIGN PRINCIPLE
RD
L3
L2
L1
Ground
ULTIMATE STRENGTH DESIGN : R E I N F O R C E D C O N C R E T E C O L U M N
DESIGN PRINCIPLE
REINFORCEMENT REQUIREMENTS
LONGITUDINAL BARS– provided to sustain compressive due
to axial load and tensile forces due to bending moments
Smax ≤ 48dties
Min. dimension
Spiral
∅?U = E. VE
cc – compression controlled
tc – tension controlled
ULTIMATE STRENGTH DESIGN : R E I N F O R C E D C O N C R E T E C O L U M N
DESIGN PRINCIPLE
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
W X = E . ^ G _ (U ( a : − a c d ) + = > ? _ g
NSCP PROVISION
ac+ ac-
Plastic
Centroid
Geometric
Centroid
p'
pq'
no no
L
no
As eccentricity increases
• area of concrete decreases (c, Cc and Cs
DECREASE)
PC
• Tensile stress in bars increases (T
INCREASES)
• Pn decreases, Mn increases
At balanced condition, e = eb
• Extreme tension bars yield (fs = fy)
As eccentricity increases
• area of concrete decreases (c, Cc and Cs
DECREASE)
PC
• Tensile stress in bars increases (T
INCREASES)
• Pn decreases, Mn increases
At balanced condition, e = eb
• Extreme tension bars yield (fs = fy)
c
εs
Beyond balanced condition, extreme T force
becomes limited (T = Asfy) (Mn decreases)
0.003
For very large eccentricities, column behaves like
a beam (C = T) (Pn = 0)
ULTIMATE STRENGTH DESIGN : R E I N F O R C E D C O N C R E T E C O L U M N
DESIGN PRINCIPLE
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
no
Capacity of Columns with Eccentricity
As eccentricity increases
• area of concrete decreases (c, Cc and Cs
DECREASE)
PC
• Tensile stress in bars increases (T
INCREASES)
• Pn decreases, Mn increases
At balanced condition, e = eb
• Extreme tension bars yield (fs = fy)
c
εs
Beyond balanced condition, extreme T force
becomes limited (T = Asfy) (Mn decreases)
0.003
For very large eccentricities, column behaves like
a beam (C = T) (Pn = 0)
ULTIMATE STRENGTH DESIGN : R E I N F O R C E D C O N C R E T E C O L U M N
DESIGN PRINCIPLE
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
no
Capacity of Columns with Eccentricity
As eccentricity increases
• area of concrete decreases (c, Cc and Cs
DECREASE)
PC
• Tensile stress in bars increases (T
INCREASES)
• Pn decreases, Mn increases
At balanced condition, e = eb
• Extreme tension bars yield (fs = fy)
c
εs
Beyond balanced condition, extreme T force
becomes limited (T = Asfy) (Mn decreases)
0.003
For very large eccentricities, column behaves like
a beam (C = T) (Pn = 0)
ULTIMATE STRENGTH DESIGN : R E I N F O R C E D C O N C R E T E C O L U M N
DESIGN PRINCIPLE
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
Analysis of Column Strength under Combined Axial and Bending . 4
a
s.
pq'
4′
nM
u
S=
0r
+
J
M'
M′c
ULTIMATE STRENGTH DESIGN : R E I N F O R C E D C O N C R E T E C O L U M N
DESIGN PRINCIPLE
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
Analysis of Column Strength under Combined Axial and Bending
ULTIMATE STRENGTH DESIGN : R E I N F O R C E D C O N C R E T E C O L U M N
DESIGN PRINCIPLE
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
5 LOADING CONDITIONS PURE AXIAL
1. Pure Axial
∅ W j = ∅ k [ E . ^ G _ (U ( a : − a c d ) + = > ? _ g ]
2. Balanced Condition ∅ v j = ∅ Wj ( w x y C = E . \ E z )
“h” is always perpendicular
3. Compression Controlled fPn £ faPo to the axis of bending
f = 0.65
4. Tension Controlled TIED
a = 0.80
5. Pure Bending f = 0.75
SPIRAL
a = 0.85
BALANCED CONDITION
3. Compression Controlled
Tension Controlled
4. Tension Controlled
Assume value for “c” , c ≤ c5 ; c5 = 3d/8
5. Pure Bending Extreme T is beyond yielding (fs = fy) use ϕ = 0.90
Therefore, Pn < Pnb , Mn < Mnb
Pure Bending
d
SECTION PROPERTIES:
d' fc’ = 21 MPa
fy = 275 Mpa
b = 250 mm
b h = 400mm
dties = 10 mm
cc = 40 mm
db = 16 mm
d = 342 mm
h
d’ = 58 mm
ULTIMATE STRENGTH DESIGN : R E I N F O R C E D C O N C R E T E C O L U M N
DESIGN PRINCIPLE
P
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS p ress
io n
Co m
Ax ial
Column Interaction Diagram Pure
Po en ding
imu mB
Min
Interaction diagrams are useful for
re
studying the strengths of columns led Failu
o l
n C ontr = 0.002
with varying proportions of loads sio }y
pres , }t <
ϕ⍺Po Com c > c b
and moments. Any combination of
loading that falls inside the curve is Desoign strength with
satisfactory, whereas any ϕ = 0.65
ed
o n troll .005
ion C }t = 0
Tens c < c b ,
ϕ = 0.90
g
B endin
Pure
M
Min ϕMn
10.6 Design and Analysis of Eccentrically Loaded Columns Using Interactio
ULTIMATE STRENGTH DESIGN : R E I N F O R C E D C O N C R E T E C O L U M N
DESIGN PRINCIPLE 2.0
INTERACTION DIAGRAM L4–60.7 h
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS z = 0.08 fc' = 4 ksi h
1.8 fy = 60 ksi
Column Interaction Diagram 0.07 = 0.7
Kmax
1.6
Interaction diagrams are useful for studying 0.06
Pn
the strengths of columns with varying 0.05 e
1.4
proportions of loads and moments. Any
0.04
combination of loading that falls inside the 1.2 fsfy = 0
0.03 This line of constant
curve is satisfactory, whereas any combination
Kn = Pn fc' Ag
eh = 0.5 was plotted
0.02 by authors for use in
falling outside the curve represents failure. 1.0
0.25 solving Example 10.7.
0.01
0.8
0.50
0.6
0.75
0.4
1.0
t = 0.0035
0.2 t = 0.0050
0.0
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55
Rn = Pnefc' Agh
ULTIMATE STRENGTH DESIGN : R E I N F O R C E D C O N C R E T E C O L U M N
DESIGN PRINCIPLE
Calculate the nominal axial load capacity of the column shown that can be applied at an eccentricity of
200 mm. Use f’c = 21 MPa and fy = 420 MPa.
450 mm 75 mm
4 – 25 mm
4 – 25 mm
400 mm
600 mm
0.0
ULTIMATE STRENGTH DESIGN : R E I N F O R C E D C O N C R E T E C O L U M N
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60
DESIGN PRINCIPLE Rn = Pn e / f / c Ag h
2.4
INTERACTION DIAGRAM L3-60.7 h
g = 0.08 h
f /c = 3 ksi
2.2 fy = 60 ksi
0.07 = 0.7
2.0
Kmax
0.06
1.8 Pn
e
0.05
1.6
0.04
1.4 fs/fy = 0
0.03
Ag
1.2
c
/
Kn = Pn / f
0.02 0.25
1.0
0.01
0.50
0.8
0.6 0.75
0.4
t = 0.0 1.0
t = 0.00035
t = 0.00 4
0.2 5
0.0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
Rn = Pn e / f / c Ag h
ULTIMATE STRENGTH DESIGN : R E I N F O R C E D C O N C R E T E C O L U M N
DESIGN PRINCIPLE 2.4
INTERACTION DIAGRAM L3-60.8 h
g = 0.08
h
f /c = 3 ksi
2.2
fy = 60 ksi
0.07
= 0.8
2.0
0.06 Kmax
1.8 Pn
e
0.05
1.6
0.04
fs/fy = 0
1.4
0.03
Ag
1.2
c
/
0.02 0.25
Kn = Pn / f
1.0
0.01
0.50
0.8
0.6 0.75
0.4
1.0
t = 0.0035
t = 0.004
t = 0.00 5
0.2
0.0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
R =P e/f/ A h
= 0. 04
0.2 005 1.0
2.4
INTERACTION DIAGRAM L3-60.7 h
g = 0.08 h
A rectangular column shown in the interaction 2.2
f /c = 3 ksi
fy = 60 ksi
diagram is acted upon by the following loads: 0.07 = 0.7
2.0
• Axial load due to dead load = 450 kN Kmax
0.06
1.4 fs/fy = 0
The column is to be analyzed and designed using
0.03
Ag
the strength method. Use b = 400 mm, h = 600 1.2
c
/
Kn = Pn / f
0.02 0.25
mm, and • = 0.70.
1.0
0.01
0.50
0.8
a. Determine the eccentricity of the column, in
millimeters, 0.6 0.75
0.0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
Rn = Pn e / f / c Ag h